Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Contamination of White and Brown Rice with Aflatoxin and Evaluation of Strategies for their Decontamination

PPCZ_42_37-43

Contamination of White and Brown Rice with Aflatoxin and Evaluation of Strategies for their Decontamination

Roheela Yasmeen1*, Sadia Amjad1 and Naseem Zahra2

1Lahore Garrison University, Pakistan

2Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

Rice is a primary food crop for over 50% of the world’s population, with approximately 500 million tons of milled rice produced globally each year. Significant food wastage occurs due to poor storage conditions, with an estimated economic loss of US$1.6 million in the rice industry attributed to aflatoxins (AFs), which also pose serious health risks. Various research efforts are underway to improve storage methods and reduce AF contamination. In this study, white and brown rice samples were analyzed for aflatoxin contamination and treated for detoxification. A total of 50 samples, 30 white rice and 20 brown rice were collected from different areas in and around Lahore, Pakistan. Aflatoxins were quantified using Thin Layer Chromatography. Various detoxification methods, including physical, chemical, and natural approaches, were applied to contaminated rice. Contamination was found in 36% of white rice samples, with 23% exceeding European Union permissible limits. In brown rice, 40% of samples were contaminated, with 20% exceeding permissible levels. The highest aflatoxin concentration (16.45 ± 0.06 µg/kg) was found in brown rice. Detoxification results showed a maximum reduction of 40.09% through cooking, 62.31% with 10% citric acid, and 82.24% with 10% clove oil for physical, chemical, and natural methods, respectively. Among these, essential oils proved to be the most effective for detoxification. The study concludes that aflatoxins are a major cause of rice spoilage, and the use of natural storage methods, such as essential oils, offers a promising solution for reducing contamination.


Article Information

The article was presented in 42nd Pakistan Congress of Zoology (International) held on 23-25th April 2024, organized by University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan.

Authors’ Contribution

RY, SA: Investigation. NZ: Supervision.

Key words

Aflatoxins, Thin layer chromatography, Contamination, Detoxification, Essential oils

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/ppcz/42.37.43

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

1013-3461/2024/0037 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2024 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



INTRODUCTION

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a major staple food all over the world (Trucksess et al., 2011; Choi et al., 2015). It is consumed by around 75% of the global population and 60% of South Asians. In grain crops, rice (Oryza sativa Linn.) are second large crop after wheat (Lutfullah and Hussain, 2012). Rice production in Pakistan is approximately 4.9 tons/hectare which makes it world’s 11th biggest producer and it contributes 1.3% in gross domestic production of country (Eslami et al., 2015; Suleman et al., 2018; Arshad et al., 2019; Khan et al., 2019). A lot of food waste occurred due to storage incapability as approximately US$ 1.6 million economical loss is only related to rice industry due to AFs. AFs are a group of nearly 20 structurally similar mycotoxins found in a wide range of foods, such as cereals, spices, nuts, figs, and dried fruit. Though, the highest levels are produced in the food crops that cultivated in the tropical regions around the globe. Because of the worldwide trade of important crops, AFs are at high concern not just for producing countries as well as for consuming ones (Prandini et al., 2009). AFs (AFTs) production is caused by the fungi Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus nomius, Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus pseudotamarii (Hassan et al., 2017; Iqbal et al., 2019; Nazir et al., 2019). Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), Aflatoxin B2 (AFB2), Aflatoxin G1 (AFG1), and Aflatoxin G2 (AFG2) are the four primary naturally occurring AFs labelled depending on their color variations in Ultraviolet (UV) light and their retention factor (Rf) on Thin Layer chromatography (TLC). AFG2 < AFB2 < AFG1 < AFB1 is the sequence of poisonous of above mentioned AFs from acute to chronic (Tahir et al., 2018).

Rice is mostly grown in subtropical climates that are known for being hot and moist. Rice is usually dried after harvesting, however when stored improperly, it can become an ideal substrate for the mould production (Reiter et al., 2010; Lai et al., 2015). Improper storage conditions lead to the fungal development and other harmful substances resulting in the loss of 15% of produced rice each year as per FAO (Dors et al., 2009).

AFs pose a potent threat to human health, either through direct intake of food or through the transmitted AFs and their byproducts in milk and meat (Nordkvist et al., 2009; Reiter et al., 2010; Naseer et al., 2014). AF B1 is the most hazardous of the AFs, having being linked to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) along with growth retardation, immunological alteration, and malnutrition (IARC, 2012). Considering AF toxicity, a lot of states have established AF tolerance levels in foods. The maximal tolerated levels for the AFs in white rice are 4 µg/kg for all AFs (AFG1 + AFG2 + AFB1 + AFB2) and 2 µg/kg for AF B1 and in brown rice these are recorded as 10 µg/kg for all AFs and 5 µg/kg for AF B1 as set by the European Unions (EU, 2010).

For the study of AFs, different techniques such as thin layer chromatography (TLC), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and ELISA can be employed (Matabaro et al., 2017). However, Thin layer chromatography is one of the best technique which has potential to detect levels of toxins and can produce good and reliable results (Namir et al., 2019). AFs have been found in rice and rice products reported from various countries such as Iran (Mazaheri, 2009), Pakistan (Majeed et al., 2013; Iqbal et al., 2014), China (Zhu et al., 2013), and Scotland (Ruadrew et al., 2013). The escalating number of studies on AFs prevalence in foodstuff and feed necessitates the development of detoxification processes that not only lowers the AFs concentration to “secure” levels under established limits but also meet the following criteria: simple to utilize, affordable and free of the risk of producing toxic substances or affecting the nutrient profile of the treated item (Méndez-Albores et al., 2004).

This study was aimed to determine the AF concentration in white and brown rice, to compare the incidence levels in both types of rice and was compared to European Union maximum limits. The study also purposed to see appropriate detoxification methods such as physical, chemical and natural for reduction of AF contamination in white and brown rice.

MATERIALs AND METHODS

Collection of samples

A total of 50 samples of white (30) and brown (20) rice were collected from various shops of five areas in and around Lahore that included Gulberg, Iqbal town, Walton, Shahdara and Kasur during August to October 2020. Ten samples were collected from each area; 6 of white rice and 4 of brown rice. One kg of rice sample was taken from a large sized jute sacks from 2-3 different places of jute bag diagonally. The collected rice samples were then passed through sample divider and obtained 200g of rice from each sample and mixed thoroughly and grinded to fine powder in a grinding mil for experimental analysis (Trucksess, 2005). All the samples were properly labelled as Gulberg (G1-G10), Iqbal town (I1-I10), Walton (W1-W10), Shahdara (S1-S10), and Kasur (K1-K10) and quantified for AFs by TLC.

Extraction of aflatoxin from rice samples

The extraction procedure was performed by taking approximately 50 g of powdered rice samples in a 500 ml conical flask. Then 150 ml chloroform and 25 ml distilled H2O was added the flask. The flasks containing rice samples were put on shaking on wrist-action shaker for 30 mins and samples were filtered in beakers by filter paper. Approximately 50 ml of filtrate was placed on heavy duty hot plate for evaporation. Dilutions for spotting were obtained in micro-liter. 25 µL spot of the sample solution was put on a TLC plate with micro syringe. 5 or 10 µL standard spots of AFs (B1, B2, G1, and G2) were also placed on the same plate as internal standards. Then the TLC plate was subjected to two TLC tanks containing mobile phases. The TLC plate was developed with anhydrous ether in first TLC tank up to the mark. After the plate was completely developed it was taken out from tank and dried. Then plate was redeveloped in the same direction in the second TLC tank with acetone and chloroform concentration of 1:9. TLC plate was then removed and left for drying (Nisa et al., 2016; Summia et al., 2021).

Identification and quantification of AFs in rice samples

For the identification and quantification of AFs in the test solution spots, the plate was scanned using ultraviolet light scanner. Comparison was made between fluorescing concentrations of specimen spots with standard spots of AFs. In case of fluorescing spot of sample lied between two standard spots, the average value of two standard spots was taken into consideration. Another very important step in the AF analysis was the fluorescing sample spots. This was carried out by spraying evenly the TLC plate with aqueous sulphuric acid (50/50 v/v). After the spraying TLC plate was allowed to dry and then viewed under UV light (365 nm).

Decontamination of contaminated samples

Detoxification of AFs were carried out by physical methods using washing and cooking (Hwang and Lee, 2006; Park and Kim, 2006), by chemical using hydrochloric acid (0.3% HCl) and citric acid (10%) (Zahra et al., 2013) and natural methods using essential oils such as 10% clove oil and cinnamon oil (Anzlovar et al., 2017).

RESULTS

In this study, 50 rice samples, including 30 white rice and 20 brown rice samples, were analyzed for aflatoxins (AFs). Among the 30 white rice samples, 11 (36%) were found to be contaminated, with 7 samples (23%) within the permissible range and 4 samples (13%) exceeding the permissible range (Table I).

Of the 20 brown rice samples, 8 (40%) were contaminated, with 4 samples (20%) within the permissible range and 4 samples (20%) exceeding it. A larger proportion of brown rice samples (40%) were found to be contaminated compared to white rice samples (36%) (Table II).

Detoxification of highly contaminated samples was performed using methods such as washing, cooking, acids, and oils. Physical methods were the least effective, reducing AFs by 24.31% to 40.09%. Chemical treatments achieved a reduction of 53.73% to 62.31%. However, the most effective results were observed with natural methods using plant oils, where clove and cinnamon oils reduced AFs by 73.88% to 82.24% (Table II).

DISCUSSION

Rice is a primarily essential food crop in several states. Rice is mainly cultivated in these countries during the rainy season. During this season, sun drying of rice, as is done by majority of the farmers, sometimes may not be enough to keep the moisture level of grains low enough to avoid fungal growth. As a result, rice grains having moisture level greater than the required threshold (>14%) may enter the storage system. Change in color of the grain or hull, quality loss, loss in vitality, and toxin contamination are all detrimental outcomes of such fungal invasion (Reddy et al., 2009).

 

Table I. Aflatoxins contamination of white rice and brown rice samples collected from different sites of Lahore permissible range according to EU (2010) is 4 µg/kg for white rice and 10 µg/kg for brown rice.

S. No.

Sample ID

Mean ± SD

White rice samples

1

Gulberg

G3

1.89 ±0.02

2

Iqbal Town

I4

1.74 ±0.01

3

Walton

W2

2.42 ± 0.03

4

W3

1.85 ± 0.07

5

W5

7.44 ± 0.2

6

Shahdara

S1

8.73 ± 0.02

7

S4

2.41 ± 0.03

8

S6

1.67 ± 0.04

9

Kasur

K3

4.60 ± 0.04

10

K5

1.54 ± 0.03

11

K6

5.45 ±0.1

Brown rice samples

1

Gulberg

G1

13.21 ± 0.03

2

G3

6.83 ± 0.1

3

Walton

W2

4.14 ±0.02

4

W4

3.92 ± 0.05

5

Kasur

K4

1.35 ± 0.02

6

Iqbal Town

I2

16.45 ± 0.06

7

Shahdara

S1

15.72 ± 0.01

S4

11.06 ± 0.04

 

Table II. Detoxification of contaminated white rice samples S1 and brown rice sample I2 by different physical, chemical, and natural methods.

Sample

Initial AF contaminations (µg/kg)

Methods

Type

AF concentration after decontamination process

Reduction in contamination (%)

Shahdara SI (white rice)

8.73 ± 0.02

Physical

Washing with water

6.45 ± 0.03

26.11

Cooking

5.23 ± 0.1

40.09

0.3% HCl

3.97 ± 0.07

54.52

Chemical

10% Citric acid

3.29 ± 0.12

62.31

Natural

10% Clove oil

1.55 ± 0.2

82.24

10% Cinnamon oil

2.28 ± 0.1

73.88

Iqbal Town I2 (Brown Rice)

16.45 ± 0.06

Physical

Washing with water

12.45 ± 0.02

24.31

Cooking

10.03 ± 0.05

39.02

Chemical

0.3% HCl

7.61 ± 0.3

53.73

10% Citric acid

6.58 ± 0.1

60

Natural

10% Clove oil

2.97 ± 0.04

81.94

10% Cinnamon oil

4.84 ± 0.15

70.57

 

38% of all samples were found tainted with further differentiation of 36% from white rice and 40% from the brown rice in the present study. A research study that was carried out in Pakistan revealed the prevalence of higher AFs contamination of 70% in the rice samples and the mean contaminated levels were 4.9 μg/kg that surpassed the secure level established by European Union 4 μg/kg. AF B1, AF B2, AF G1, and AF G2 were present in levels up to 18, 10.4, 8.4, and 12 μg/kg, accordingly (Ali et al., 2011).

Various varieties of rice, comprising parboiled, white, brown, paddy, and broken, were documented to have AFs (Iqbal et al., 2012) and results of white and brown rice samples were comparable to our existing findings. Paddy rice were majorly infected (64%), while brown rice were least effected (33%) followed by white rice (42%). The study also claimed dietary rice as a main source of AFs in human beings. Asghar et al. (2014) documented AFB1 and AFB2 prevalence in 95.4% and 7.6% in Pakistani brown rice, respectively that as very high as compared to our findings for the brown rice that was 40%. Whereas AFG1 and AFG2 were not found in any sample and that was very similar to current study. Overall AFs occurred between 1.07 and 27.27 μg/kg.

Different physical, chemical and biological methods were also adopted to reduce AF levels in rice. Park et al. (2005) concluded that the reduction of AFB1 in rice after washing with water ranged from 20 to 24%, with an average of 22% which support our results.

In different studies conducted in Korea, cooking positively decreased total AFs 34% and 31-36% in originally contaminated refined rice (Park et al., 2005; Park and Kim, 2006). Both the studies were in line with our work. The impact of steaming at 160 °C by ordinary cooker on AF deposits in the cooked rice had been documented previously by others (Park et al., 2005).

Zahra et al. (2013) documented 55% decrease of AFB1 in rice by 0.3% HCl which is in agreement with the results of our experiment. As HCl is a strong acid so its mild concentration is used in experiment because high concentration can change the organoleptic properties of food.

Citric acid (C6 H8 O7) was utilized for the conservation measures. It has particular, distinctive, corrosive and tarty flavors, incorporated into different kinds of beverages and edibles. Lemon juice comprises of 5 % citric acid. Reaction with the diluted citric acid degraded AF B1 in rice. In present study tainted samples were immersed in lemon juice for decontamination. The outcomes of that experiment revealed that citric acid was 63.59% to 90% effectual, against AFB1 in the various types screened (Safara et al., 2010; Karlovsky et al., 2016).

Few essential oils and compounds in plant extracts are taken up as generally recognized as safe (GRAS). Different amounts (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10% (w/v)) of Syzygium aromaticum pure diluted extracts were screened for their potential resistive impact on Aspergillus growth and AF formation in 50 g of rice. The outcomes revealed that Syzygium aromaticum at 10% (w/v) and restricted the Aspergillus growth and also lowered the AF formation rate in rice (Thanaboripat et al., 1997). Reddy et al. (2009) noticed that mold growth and AF development were totally restricted after employing of diluted extracts from clove on healthy kernels of a rice cultivator for five days. Eugenol (C10H12O2) is a phenolic substance obtained chiefly from buds and leaves of Syzygium aromaticum and from Cinnamomum zeylanicum, comprising the most important and active compound of clove oil (85 to 95%) along with methyleugenol and iso-eugenol (Souza et al., 2005). The most effectual compounds of cinnamon essential oil because of their biological activities were suggested to be cinnamaldehyde and eugenol (Siddiqua et al., 2015).

Physical and chemical decontamination strategies may have certain restrictions like loss of minerals, ineffectiveness and variations in the organoleptic properties of food. But, the application of natural methods (plant oils) is a secure way of detoxification of AF contamination in rice samples. This study provided updated knowledge regarding AFs contamination in different areas and results provided a good contribution to food authorities and they can form and imply regulations to control this.

Conclusion

It was concluded that the contamination percentages of aflatoxins (AFs) differed between brown and white rice samples, with higher concentrations detected in brown rice. Rice samples collected from various locations exhibited varying levels of AF contamination, with the highest levels found in samples from Walton and Shahdara, likely due to improper storage conditions. While physical and chemical detoxification methods were moderately effective, natural methods proved more effective for long-term storage. This study provides updated insights into AF contamination across different rice types and regions, contributing valuable information for food authorities regarding the implementation of safety regulations.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors of the present investigations gratefully acknowledge Head of Department, Lahore Garrison University and PCSIR lab staff for their cooperation.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

Ali, J., Hussain, A. and Ullah, S., 2011. Studies on contamination level of aflatoxins in Pakistani rice. J. chem. Soc. Pak., 33: 481.

Anzlovar, S., Likar, M. and Koce, J.D., 2017. Antifungal potential of thyme essential oil as a preservative for storage of wheat seeds. Acta Bot. Croat., 76: 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1515/botcro-2016-0044

Arshad, M., Hussain, T., Chaudhry, N., Sadia, H., Aslam, B., Tahir, U., Abbas, M., Qureshi, N., Nazir, A., Rajoka, M.I. and Iqba, M., 2019. Enhancing profitability of ethanol fermentation through gamma ray mutagenesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiaePol. J. environ. Stud., 28: 35-41. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/78708

Asghar, M.A., Iqbal, J., Ahmed, A. and Khan, M.A., 2014. Occurrence of aflatoxins contamination in brown rice from Pakistan. Iran. J. Publ. Hlth., 43: 291.

Choi, S., Jun, H., Bang, J., Chung, S.H., Kim, Y., Kim, B.S., Beuchat, L.R. and Ryu, J.H., 2015. Behaviour of Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium graminearum on rice as affected by degree of milling, temperature, and relative humidity during storage. Fd. Microbiol., 46: 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.08.019

Dors, G.C., de Almeida Pinto, L.A. and Badiale-Furlong, E., 2009. Migration of mycotoxins into rice starchy endosperm during the parboiling process. LWT Fd. Sci. Technol., 42: 433-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2008.03.012

Eslami, M., Mashak, Z., Heshmati, A., Shokrzadeh, M. and Mozaffari Nejad, A.S., 2015. Determination of aflatoxin B1 levels in Iranian rice by ELISA method. Toxin Rev., 34: 125-128. https://doi.org/10.3109/15569543.2015.1074925

EU, 2010. European Union commission regulation (EU) No. 165/2010 of 26 February 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as regards aflatoxins. Off. J. Eur. Union L., 50: 8–12.

Hassan, S.M., Iqbal, M., Bokhari, T.H., Nisar, N., Tahir, M.A., Abbas, M., Kanwal, Q., Iqbal, D.N. and Nazir, A., 2017. Fungal infestation and aflatoxins synthesis control in stored poultry feed using medicinal plants. Environ. Technol. Innovat., 7: 194-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.03.001

Hwang, J.H. and Lee, K.G., 2006. Reduction of aflatoxin B1 contamination in wheat by various cooking treatments. Fd. Chem., 98: 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.04.038

Iqbal, M., Abbas, M., Adil, M., Nazir, A. and Ahmad, I., 2019. Aflatoxins biosynthesis, toxicity and intervention strategies: A review. Chem. Int., 5: 168-191. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3407341

Iqbal, S.Z., Mustafa, H.G., Asi, M.R. and Jinap, S., 2014. Variation in vitamin E level and aflatoxins contamination in different rice varieties. J. Cer. Sci., 60: 352-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2014.05.012

Iqbal, S.Z., Asi, M.R., Ariño, A., Akram, N. and Zuber, M., 2012. Aflatoxin contamination in different fractions of rice from Pakistan and estimation of dietary intakes. Mycotoxin Res., 28: 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-012-0131-1

IRAC, 2012. Aflatoxins, IRAC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks on humans.

Karlovsky, P., Suman, M., Berthiller, F., De Meester, J., Eisenbrand, G., Perrin, I., Oswald, I.P., Speijers, G., Chiodini, A., Recker, T., T. and Dussort, P., 2016. Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination. Mycotoxin Res., 32: 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-016-0257-7

Khan, A.S., Arif, K., Munir, B., Kiran, S., Jalal, F., Qureshi, N., Hassan, S.M., Soomro, G.A., Nazir, A., Ghaffar, A. and Tahir, M.A., 2019. Estimating total phenolics in Taraxacum officinale (L.) extracts. Pol. J. environ. Stud., 28: 497. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/78435

Lai, X., Zhang, H., Liu, R. and Liu, C., 2015. Potential for aflatoxin B1 and B2 production by Aspergillus flavus strains isolated from rice samples. Saudi J. biol. Sci., 22: 176-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.09.013

Lutfullah, G. and Hussain, A., 2012. Studies on contamination level of aflatoxins in some cereals and beans of Pakistan. Fd. Contr., 23: 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.06.004

Majeed, S., Iqbal, M., Asi, M.R. and Iqbal, S.Z., 2013. Aflatoxins and ochratoxin A contamination in rice, corn and corn products from Punjab, Pakistan. J. Cereal Sci., 58: 446-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2013.09.007

Matabaro, E., Ishimwe, N., Uwimbabazi, E. and Lee, B.H., 2017. Current immunoassay methods for the rapid detection of aflatoxin in milk and dairy products. Comp. Rev. Fd. Sci. Fd. Saf., 16: 808-820. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12287

Mazaheri, M., 2009. Determination of aflatoxins in imported rice to Iran. Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 47: 2064-2066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.05.027

Méndez-Albores, J.A., Villa, G.A., Del Rio-García, J.C. and Martínez, E.M., 2004. Aflatoxin-detoxification achieved with Mexican traditional nixtamalization process (MTNP) is reversible. J. Sci. Fd. Agric., 84: 1611-1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1853

Namir, H., Hadzic, R. and Malesevic, I., 2019. Application of thin layer chromatography for qualitative analysis of gunpowder in purpose of life prediction of ammunition. Int. J. Biosen. Bioelectron., 5: 4-12. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijbsbe.2019.05.00144

Naseer, R., Sultana, B., Khan, M.Z., Naseer, D. and Nigam, P., 2014. Utilization of waste fruit-peels to inhibit aflatoxins synthesis by Aspergillus flavus: A biotreatment of rice for safer storage. Bioresour. Technol., 172: 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.017

Nazir, A., Kalim, I., Sajjad, M., Usman, M. and Iqbal, M., 2019. Prevalence of aflatoxin contamination in pulses and spices in different regions of Punjab. Chem. Int., 5: 274.

Nisa, A., Zahra, N. and Yasha, N.B., 2016. Comparative study of aflatoxins in brown rice samples of local and import quality. Int. Fd. Res. J., 23: 243.

Nordkvist, E., Stepinska, A. and Häggblom, P., 2009. Aflatoxin contamination of consumer milk caused by contaminated rice by-products in compound cattle feed. J. Sci. Fd. Agric., 89: 359-361. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3445

Park, J.W. and Kim, Y.B., 2006. Effect of pressure cooking on aflatoxin B1 in rice. J. Agric. Fd. Chem., 54: 2431-2435. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf053007e

Park, J.W., Lee, C. and Kim, Y.B., 2005. Fate of aflatoxin B1 during the cooking of Korean polished rice. J. Fd. Prot., 68: 1431-1434. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-68.7.1431

Prandini, A., Tansini, G.I.N.O., Sigolo, S., Filippi, L.A.U.R.A., Laporta, M. and Piva, G., 2009. On the occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products. Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 47: 984-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.10.005

Reddy, K.R.N., Reddy, C.S. and Muralidharan, K., 2009. Potential of botanicals and biocontrol agents on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus infecting rice grains. Fd. Cont., 20: 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.03.009

Reddy, K.R.N., Abbas, H.K., Abel, C.A., Shier, W.T., Oliveira, C.A.F. and Ragha-Vender, C.R., 2009. Mycotoxin contamination of commercially important agricultural commodities. Toxin Rev., 28: 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569540903092050

Reiter, E.V., Vouk, F., Böhm, J. and Razzazi-Fazeli, E., 2010. Aflatoxins in rice–a limited survey of products marketed in Austria. Fd. Contr., 21: 988-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.12.014

Ruadrew, S., Craft, J. and Aidoo, K., 2013. Occurrence of toxigenic Aspergillus spp. and aflatoxins in selected food commodities of Asian origin sourced in the West of Scotland. Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 55: 653-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.02.001

Safara, M., Zaini, F., Hashemi, S.J., Mahmoudi, M., Khosravi, A.R. and Shojai-Aliabadi, F., 2010. Aflatoxin detoxification in rice using citric acid. Iran. J. Publ. Hlth., 39: 24.

Siddiqua, S., Anusha, B.A., Ashwini, L.S. and Negi, P.S., 2015. Antibacterial activity of cinnamaldehyde and clove oil: Effect on selected foodborne pathogens in model food systems and watermelon juice. J. Fd. Sci. Technol., 52: 5834-5841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1642-x

Souza, E.L.D., Lima, E.D.O., Freire, K.R.D.L. and Sousa, C.P.D., 2005. Inhibitory action of some essential oils and phytochemicals on the growth of various moulds isolated from foods. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 48: 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132005000200011

Suleman, M., Nouren, S., Hassan, S.M., Faiz, A.H., Sahr, G.A., Soomro, G.A., Tahir, M.A., Iqbal, M. and Nazir, A., 2018. Vitality and implication of natural products from Viburnum grandiflorum: An eco-friendly approach. Pol. J. environ. Stud., 27: 1407. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/76798

Summia, K., Yasmeen, R., Zahra, N., 2021. Detection of aflatoxins B 1 from layer and broiler feed samples collected from different cities of Punjab. Pakistan. J. Anim. Hlth. Prod., 9: 435-442.

Tahir, N.I., Hussain, S., Javed, M., Rehman, H., Shahzady, T.G., Parveen, B. and Ali, K.G., 2018. Nature of aflatoxins: Their extraction, analysis, and control. J. Fd. Saf., 38: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12561

Thanaboripat, D., Nontabenjawan, K., Leesin, K., Teerapiannont, D., Sukcharoen, O. and Ruangrattanamatee, R., 1997. Inhibitory effect of garlic, clove and carrot on growth of Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin production. J. For. Res., 8: 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02864939

Trucksess, M.W., 2005. Natural toxins. In: Official methods of analysis of AOAC international (eds. W. Horwitz and G.W. Latimer). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. pp. 1-85.

Trucksess, M.W., Abbas, H.K., Weaver, C.M. and Shier, W.T., 2011. Distribution of aflatoxins in shelling and milling fractions of naturally contaminated rice. Fd. Addit. Contam. A28: 1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2011.576441

Zahra, N., Hina, S., Hayat, R. and Ejaz, N., 2013. Quantification and detoxification of aflatoxin in food items. Biol. Sci. Pak. J. scient. indust. Res.56: 98-104. https://doi.org/10.52763/PJSIR.BIOL.SCI.56.2.2013.98.104

Zhu, Z., Liu, G., Chen, Y. and Cheng, J., 2013. Assessment of aflatoxins in pigmented rice using a validated immunoaffinity column method with fluorescence HPLC. J. Fd. Comp. Anal., 31: 252-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2013.05.011

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

October

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56, Iss. 5, pp. 2001-2500

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe