Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN
Latest Blogs: https://researcherslinks.com/en/kahoot-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/blooket-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/comcast-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/gimkit-login/

Comparative Effect of Different Types of Water used in Immersing Beef on Reducing their Bacterial Contamination

Comparative Effect of Different Types of Water used in Immersing Beef on Reducing their Bacterial Contamination

M.J.Al-Saadi*, Dahfir A. Alobaidi, Jassim E.Q.Al-Musawi 

Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

*Correspondence | M.J. Al-Saadi, Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Iraq; Email: majid.j@covm.uobaghdad.edu.iq
 

Figure 1

Rates of total aerobic bacteria present in beef samples after 3 minutes of exposure to different types of washing water. G1: without wash, G2: tap water, G3: distilled water, G4: magnetized water, G5: ozone water.  

Figure 2

Rates of total aerobic bacteria present in beef samples after 6 minutes of exposure to different types of washing water. G1: without wash, G2: tap water, G3: distilled water, G4: magnetized water, G5: ozone water. 

Figure 3

Bacterial counting following soaking of meat with different types of washing water for 3 minutes. A: without soaking, B: soaking in tap water, C: soaking in distilled water, D: soaking in magnetic water, E: soaking in ozonized water.  

Figure 4

Bacterial counting following soaking of meat with different types of washing water for 3 minutes. A: without soaking, B: soaking in tap water, C: soaking in distilled water, D: soaking in magnetic water, E: soaking in ozonized water.  

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

October

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56, Iss. 5, pp. 2001-2500

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe