Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Characterization of Bacterial Microbiota in the Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) of Buffaloes Using PCR-Based Analysis

Characterization of Bacterial Microbiota in the Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) of Buffaloes Using PCR-Based Analysis

Phoebe Lyndia Tolentino Llantada1,2*, Midori Umekawa2, Shuichi Karita2

1Philippine Carabao Center National Headquarters and Genepool, Philippines; 2Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, 1577 Kurimamachiya-cho, Tsu city, Mie 514-8507, Japan.

 
*Correspondence | Phoebe Lyndia Tolentino Llantada, Philippine Carabao Center National Headquarters and Genepool, Philippines; Email: llantadaphoebe@gmail.com

Figure 1:

Major types of buffalo in the Philippines (A) swamp buffalo or the Philippine native carabao and (B) riverine buffalo or the dairy type.

Figure 2:

Sampling locations along gastrointestinal tract of a dairy buffalo: A: Rumen, B: Reticulum, C: Omasum, D: Abomasum, E: Duodenum, F: Jejunum, G: Ileum, H: Cecum, I: Colon and J: Rectum.

Figure 3:

PCR-DGGE profiles of the gastrointestinal bacterial community of Buffalo 1 (A) and Buffalo 2 (B); marked with numbers are the selected bands for DNA sequence analysis. RF: Rumen fluid samples; RD: Rumen digesta samples; RT: Rumen Tissue samples; RE: Reticulum digesta samples; RET: Reticulum tissue samples; OM: Omasum samples; AB: Abomasum samples; DU: Duodenum samples; JE: Jejunum samples; IL: Ileum samples; CE: Cecum samples; CO: Colon samples and REC: Rectum samples.

Figure 4:

Distribution of 16S rRNA sequences from the GIT of riverine buffalo (Buffalo 1); Percentage of identified and uncultured bacteria (A); Percentage of the total relative abundances of phyla; Percentage of relative abundances of class (C) and relative abundances in phyla at the different locations in the GIT (D).

Figure 5:

Distribution of 16S rRNA sequences from the GIT of riverine buffalo (Buffalo 2); Percentage of identified and uncultured bacteria (A); Percentage of the total relative abundances of phyla; Percentage of relative abundances of class (C) and relative abundances in phyla at the different locations in the GIT (D).

Figure 6:
Species richness index (R) of the GIT sites from the two buffalo, R= s, where s is the number of bands in each sample.
Table 7:

Detection of fibrolytic and non-fibrolytic bacteria in the different gut sections of dairy buffaloes using species specific primer sets.

, Highly detected; , Slightly detected; X, Not detected.
Table 4:

Species specific primer set for the detection of fibrolytic and nonfibrolytic bacteria.

Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences

May

Vol. 12, Iss. 5, pp. 802-993

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe