Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Developmental and Pluripotent Genes in Rat Adult and Neonatal Kidney

PJZ_55_2_687-693

Developmental and Pluripotent Genes in Rat Adult and Neonatal Kidney

Sumreen Begum, Atta-ur-Rahman and Asmat Salim*

Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

Investigating the role of genes in kidney with respect to their specific mechanism in renal development is imperative to regeneration. The purpose of this study is to analyze systematic identification of genes with respect to nephron lineage and pluripotency during postnatal renal development and at adult stage of rat kidney. In the current study, the mRNA levels of nephron genes were analyzed by reverse transcriptase PCR in neonatal and adult rat kidney tissues. These genes were divided into three categories. Group 1: renal multipotent progenitor genes; Group 2: self-renewal and pluripotency genes; Group 3 pluripotent state regulator genes. In neonates, renal progenitor genes Wt1, Pax2, Cad6, Six2 and HNF1β were significantly expressed with concomitant expression of pluripotency genes. Nanog was highly expressed as compared to Oct4 and Sox2 at neonatal stage. Aicda, Glis1, Tbx3 and Dppa5 revealed higher expression among the regulatory genes in neonates, while Lin28, Klf4 and Stat3 were found with no significant difference as compared to adult stage. The nephron specific and pluripotency genes co-expressed in neonatal kidney and highly influenced by the Aicda, Glis1, Tbx3, and Dppa5. Further, Lin 28, Klf4, and Stat3 are required to maintain their expression states during and after development of rat kidney. Hence, over-expression of these genes may provoke the reprogramming of the adult injured tissue for the mechanism of regeneration.


Article Information

Received 15 July 2021

Revised 03 January 2022

Accepted 26 January 2022

Available online 22 March 2022

(early access)

Published 20 December 2022

Authors’ Contribution

SB conducted experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the first draft. AR and AS conceived the idea. AS finalized the draft in the current form.

Key words

Pluripotent, Gene expression, Renal regeneration, Development, Nephronal

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20210715060758

* Corresponding author: asmat.salim@iccs.edu

0030-9923/2023/0002-687 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2023 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Abbreviations

Pax2, Paired box gene 2; Wt1, Wilm’s tumor suppressor gene1; Six2, Sine oculis homeobox homolog 2; Cad6, Cadherin-6; HNF1β, Hepatic nuclear factor 1 beta; Oct4, Octamer-binding protein 4; Sox2, SRY (Sex determining region Y)-box 2); Nanog, Homeobox transcription factor Nanog; Lin28, Lin-28 homolog A (C. elegans); Klf4, Kruppel-like factor 4 (Gut); Aicda, Activation-induced cytidine deaminase; Dppa5, Developmental pluripotency associated 5; Tbx3, T-Box 3; Glis1, GLIS family zinc finger 1; Stat3, Signal transducer and activator 3.



INTRODUCTION

The current understanding of regeneration and repair mechanism is still lacking including in kidney, which is one of the vital organ of the body. It is evidenced in other species that regeneration process follows orchestration of events of the development. Kidney has been investigated for long to explore the possible mechanisms of repair and development. Kidney develops from intermediate mesoderm (IM) and has three phases of its maturation; which include pronephros, mesonephros and metanephros which constitute initial non-functional part, intermediate form, and complete / mature mammalian adult kidney, respectively (Li and Wingert, 2003). A sequential developmental program initiated from metanephric mesenchyme (MM) and condenses to form progenitor populations of cap or committed mesenchyme (CM) in presence of growth factors around ureteric bud (UB) (Pleniceanu et al., 2010). It leads to mesenchyme to, epithelial transition (MET) with silencing of major transcription factors while acquisition of the epithelial markers. A renal vesicle (RV) was formed subsequently, and each RV develops into one nephron. The first evidence of epithelialization is the expression of adhesive proteins Cadherin 4 and then Cadherin 6 (Hendry et al., 2011; Miller-Hodges and Hohenstein, 2012).

The relationship of cell proliferation and apoptosis is important in normal kidney development. A recent study showed that with the maturation of mouse kidney, cell proliferation activity decreases. ZFX gene is important for regulation of growth, proliferation and differentiation in tissue cells, while the Bcl2 and BAX genes regulate apoptosis. ZFX gene may participate in the developmental process of the kidney through the balance of cell proliferation and apoptosis regulation (Wang et al., 2021).

Precise information regarding the mechanism of differentiation of precursor cells to lineage specific cells is useful in specifying target cells for cellular repair. The precursor cells identified in adult renal papilla, Bowman’s capsule and tubular compartment express Pax2, CD133 and CD24 (Li and Wingert, 2003). These tubular cells can differentiate into renal epithelial-like cells in vitro (Sallustio et al., 2010). It has been demonstrated that precursor population expressing CD133+, CD24+, and CD106- engrafted into tubules. Similar cells can serve as regenerating population in tubules of acute and chronic tubular damage (Angelotti et al., 2012). The data, however, is still conflicting in determining the exact cell source for nephron repair. Multipotent renal progenitor cells (MRPCs) and mouse kidney progenitor cells (MKPCs) express early nephrogenesis genes and are involved in this repair. They rescue renal damage in murine kidneys (Li and Wingert, 2013; Gupta et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2010). Kidney derived cells identified and isolated from transgenic rats, showed expression of Pax2 and Oct4 (Liu et al., 2016).

Wt1, Pax2, Cas6, Six2, and HNF1β are important regulators of normal kidney development (Miller-Hodges and Hohenstein, 2012). Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog are pluripotency genes and autoregulate each other and share a substantial overlap in their downstream target genes (Ng et al., 2008). Glis1, Klf4 belong to the same family. The exact and systematic role of the other pluripotency regulatory genes such as Lin28, AID, Dppa5, Tbx3, and Stat3 is still not fractioned in the rat kidney.

In the present study, we have analyzed the systematic expression pattern of genes that are known to play significant roles in pluripotency, and nephronal lineage development. These genes are important for development of neonatal kidney, renal lineage differentiation, regulation of self-renewal and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells, and for reprogramming from mesenchymal to epithelial transition. Recognition of the expression pattern of these genes during development and at adult stage would be useful in designing novel strategies for improved renal differentiation of mature cells through stem or somatic cells in regeneration for the damaged kidney tissue.

Combination of these genes can be tested for either reprogramming of mature cell types for the generation of more potent induced pluripotent cells or differentiation of stem cells to directed nephronal lineage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

All the animals were used according to the international guidelines for the care and experimental use of laboratory animals with the approval from the local ethical committee. Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (N=4/group) weighing 200-250 gm, and 1 day old pups were used for the isolation of kidneys. The potential quantitative errors in the relative estimates to GAPDH were reduced by repeating the tissue samples.

Sample collection

Adult rat kidneys (ARK) and neonatal rat kidneys (NRK) were isolated from adult rat and one day old rat pups, respectively. Kidneys were cut in small pieces and blood was removed by rinsing with saline. Tissues were quickly transferred to RNA Later solution (Qiagen, Germany), and stored at -20°C until further use.

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA from the sample was isolated using Trizol. Samples were processed in a ratio of 1mL Trizol reagent per ≤ 20 mg tissue. After dissociation, homogenization and sonication, sample mixtures were incubated for 15 min at room temperature (RT). Chloroform (200 µL) was added to the mixture and incubated for 15 min at RT. Samples were phase separated by centrifugation (8000-11000 x g). Aqueous phase was collected for RNA extraction. Ice cold isopropyl alcohol (750 µL) was added and mixture was centrifuged (6000 x g at 4oC; 10 min) to get RNA pellet. The pellet was washed in 1 mL of 75% ethanol and centrifuged (6500 x g at 4oC; 10 min). The pellet was air-dried (~ 30 min) and dissolved in 30-40 µL of nuclease-free water. Total RNA yield and purity (A260 / A280 ratio) was determined by diluting samples (1:200) and measuring absorbance at 260nm in a UV visible spectrophotometer.

Total RNA (1µg) from rat kidney tissues was calculated and used for cDNA synthesis via Revert AidTM First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Fermentas, Life Sciences, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All samples were stored at -80oC or used directly for amplification by PCR.

Kidney developmental genes and core and downstream pluripotency genes were selected for the analysis. Accession numbers of selected genes, primer sequences, product sizes and annealing temperatures are listed in Table I. Online mRNA servers, http://primer3.wi.mit.edu and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast were used for primer designing. The primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT), USA.

cDNA (1µg) was amplified by using GoTaq Flexi DNA polymerase kit (Promega, USA) for gene expression analysis. The protocol was followed according to manufacturer’s instructions. The thermal cycle comprised initial denaturation at 95 oC for 2 min, and 35 cycles each of denaturation at 95 oC for 1 min, annealing at 55-64 oC for 1 min, and extension at 72 oC for 1 min followed by final extension at 72 oC for 10 min.

 

Table I. Genes and their primer sequences, accession numbers, expected product sizes and annealing temperatures.

Genes

Accession # (NCBI)

Primer sequence (5’-3’)

Product size (bp)

Annealing temp (°C)

Group 1: Kidney specific developmental genes

Wt1

NM_031534

F GCCTTCACCTTGCACTTCTC

R GACCGTGCTGTATCCTTGGT

186

58

Pax2

NM_001106361.1

F AGGAGGTGGAGGTTTGCATCTGG

R ACTTCATCAAGCCCAGGGGTCAG

216

64

Cad6

NM_012927

R CCGTGAGGGGTTCTCCGTTGT

F AGTAAGGGGCGTGGCCAACCT

232

64

Six2

NM_053759

F TTGATTCTGGGGTTCTTTGC

R CAAGCCTGGGTGTTTTTGTT

183

58

HNF1β

NM_013103

F GACACTCCTCCCATCCTCAA

R ACATCAACCACCTCCCTCTG

167

58

Group 2: Core pluripotency genes

Oct4

NM_001009178.2

F GAGGGATGTGGTTCGAGTGT

R CCAGAGCAGTGACAGGAACA

248

58

Nanog

NM_001100781

F CCCAAGCTAAAGCTGTCTGG

R ATCTGCTGGAGGCTGAGGTA

167

55

Sox2

NM_001109181.1

F AAGGGTTCTTGCTGGGTTTT

R GCCCTAAACAAGACCACGAA

160

58

Group 3: Pluripotency regulatory genes

Lin28

NM_001109269

F CCCAGTGTCACCCTGTCTTT

R CCTGTAACAGCCACTCAGCA

164

58

Klf4

NM_053713

F CACACTGCCAGGAGAGAGTT

R CAGTCTCAGACCCCATCTGT

164

58

Aicda

NM_001100779.1

F CAAGACCATGGCAAGGAAAT

R TCCCGTGGGTCTTTTAAGTG

189

55

Tbx3

NM_181638.1

F CAGAGCCAACGACATTCTGA

R CCTCATGGACTGCAGAGTGA

205

55

Glis1

XM_003749991.1

F AGACTACAGCGTGTCCAAGG

R ATTCGCATACGTAGCCTGAG

235

58

Dppa5

XM_001059859

F GGATCTCGAATGCCTCACAT

R CAGTTCCAGGGTCTTCATGG

213

58

Stat3

NM_012747

F CAGCCAAACTCCCAGATCAT

R GGCGGACAGAACATAGGTGT

231

57

GAPDH was used as internal standard

F GAAAAGCTGTGGCGTGATGG

R GTAGGCCATGAGGTCCACCA

414

60

 

PCR sample with GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase) expression and reverse transcriptase negative (-RT) sample served as positive and negative controls, respectively.

 

The amplified PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis using 1-2 % agarose gel in 1X TBE buffer (89mM Tris base, 89mM boric acid, 50mM EDTA) using horizontal gel casting unit. PCR products (10µL) were loaded into each well while one well was reserved for loading molecular weight ladder / marker (HyperLadder™ 50 or 100bp).

The DNA bands were visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light in a gel documentation system (Alpha Innotech, Alpha EAse FC imaging system, FluorChemTM, USA) and photographed for semi-quantification. The intensity of bands was quantified using FluorChem TM AlphaEase FC software. The integrated density value (IDV) of each band was calculated, normalized with the corresponding GAPDH band density and relative gene expression was compared with the control groups. The repeating quantitative estimation was carried out for more rigorous estimations.

Statistical analysis

Results were illustrated as means with their standard errors (means ± SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using Shapiro-Wilk (Student’s t test) by Sigma Plot 12. Probability values less than 0.05 (p< 0.05) were considered to be statistically significant for each experimental finding.

RESULTS

Expression of kidney specific developmental genes

Specific kidney developmental genes showed significantly higher mRNA expression levels of Wt1 (*p<0.05), Cad6, Pax2, Six2, and Hnf1β (**p<0.01) in neonatal rat kidney as compared to that in case of adult kidney (Fig. 1). Pax2 expression was not detected in adult kidney tissue.

 

Core pluripotency genes

Core pluripotency genes showed significantly higher mRNA expression levels in case of Oct4, Sox2 (*p<0.05) and Nanog (**p<0.01) in neonatal rat kidney as compared to that in case of adult kidney (Fig. 2). Nanog was highly expressed as compared to Oct4 and Sox2 at neonatal stage. Oct4 expression was not detected in adult kidney tissue.

 

Pluripotency regulatory genes

Pluripotency regulatory genes showed significantly higher mRNA expression levels in case of Aicda (*p<0.05), Glis1, Dppa5 and Tbx3 (**p<0.01) in neonatal rat kidneys as compared to that in case of adult kidney. Difference in the expression levels of Lin28, Klf4 and Stat3 genes was however, not significant (Fig. 3). Glis1 expression was not detected in adult kidney tissue.

DISCUSSION

Expression levels of specific genes play a critical role in the regulatory mechanisms associated with nephrogenesis during kidney development (Hendry et al., 2011). The varying patterns of unique set of genes during developmental and mature stages can provide insight for regeneration mechanisms of injured kidney. With this objective, the present study was designed to determine and compare transcriptional levels of certain genes that maintain rat kidney development at neonatal stage and in adult stage. It can provide novel insights into the gene expression patterns and networks active in immature and fully differentiated cells in rat kidney. Secondary objective of this study was to deduce converging points of the two cellular phenotypes.

Kidney is a very complex organ for tissue engineering as its function is dependent on the correct spatial conformation of many different cell types. During normal development, two cell type i.e. MM ureteric bud (UB) can build the complete structure (Miller-Hodges and Hohenstein, 2012). DNA-binding factors, which are essential for the IM and the renal epithelial lineage, could provide the locus and tissue specificity for histone methylation and chromatin remodeling and thus establish a kidney-specific fate during development (Dressler, 2008).

 

We observed that the group of genes specifically involved in nephrogenesis was up-regulated in neonatal kidney. These results confirm that the continuation of postnatal nephron development is in conjunction with the expression of progenitor genes of nephrons including Wt1, Pax2, and Six2. Wt1 and Pax2 are considered as key cap mesenchyme (CM) genes, which act as transcription factors (TF) in the formation of a pronephric field from animal cap ectoderm (Hendry et al., 2011; Yamamura et al., 2021). Wt1 is a critical regulator of MM that plays a role even before ureteric bud (UB) formation and controls transitions between the mesenchymal and epithelial states of cells in a tissue dependent manner (Miller-Hodges and Hohenstein, 2012). Pax2 is expressed in ureteric bud (UB) and in the induced mesenchyme. The inductive signals from WNT pathway is interpreted by Pax2 which results in aggregation, polarization, and proliferation of epithelial cells (Dressler, 2009). Complete repression or down-regulation of Pax2 has been observed in adult rat kidney as the differentiation of nephron proceeds (Imgrund et al., 1999). Six2 maintains undifferentiated, self-renewing and pluripotent state of nephron’s stem or progenitor cells (Murphy et al., 2012) promoting MM in kidney development (Kobayashi et al., 2008). Cadherin 6 is involved in adhesion activity and maintains orderly structure of cells at developmental stage, involved in tissue integrity and morphogenesis, specifically renal proximal tubular epithelium (Gumbiner, 2005). Down-regulation of these core nephron specific developmental genes was observed in adult rat kidney as compared to that of one day postnatal pups. This demonstrates complete epithelialization for unique functionality of nephron at adult stage, which may not require these genes. HNF1β gene expression at neonatal stage confirms its role in normal proximo-distal segmentation pattern and podocyte formation but not in epithelialization of normal kidney organogenesis (Paces-Fessy et al., 2012). This may be due to increased segmentation process, still going in postnatal stage, which is associated with the function of HNF1β. Malfunctioning, absence or mutation of these genes are involved in kidney diseases which are being utilized for modeling kidney tissues in vitro (Rooney et al., 2021).

Pluripotency and stemness are believed to be associated with high Oct-3/4, Nanog and Sox-2 expression. Pluripotent cells are master cells. They are able to make cells from all three basic layers, so they can potentially produce any cell or tissue of the body that needs to repair itself. They are also able to self-renew, hence they can perpetually create more copies of themselves. Oct4 considered as the master regulator of pluripotency and differentiation (Paces-Fessy et al., 2012) is involved in regeneration by promoting cellular de-differentiation (Skvarca et al., 2019). Its expression influences several genes including Sox2, FGF4, Rex1. Nanog and Sox2 also maintain pluripotent state and Sox2 is also associated with multipotent and unipotent stem cells (Zhao et al., 2012). Similar to embryonic stem cells (ESCs), high Sox2 expression eventually became the measure of pluripotency in any cell. According to Ng et al. (2008), Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog auto-regulate each other. Oct4 may serve as pluripotency determinant in reprogramming. Neonatal rat kidney has shown the presence of possible pluripotent cells, as significant levels of core pluripotency genes including Oct4, Nanog and Sox2 and other maintenance genes Aicda, Esg1/ Dppa5, Glis1 and Tbx3, were detected. These results revealed that pluripotent genes are not repressed in neonatal kidney at this stage; their repression may be a gradual process, which is regulated by the above mentioned maintenance genes. Moreover, perfect interplay of these expression levels is necessary in this stage of kidney development. We observed that the expression levels of Lin28, Klf4, and Stat3 were not increased in adult rat kidney. Stat3 represent higher expression ratio within neonatal and adult kidney groups showing its importance in both states as it is involved in many pathways. However, its expression was not significantly different in neonatal and adult kidney groups. Elevated expression levels of AID/Aicda in neonatal kidney support its essential role as epigenetic modifier of pluripotency network. It regulates transcription of many genes by deaminating methylated cytidine (5-methylcytosine) (Popp et al., 2010; De Carvalho et al., 2010). Tbx3 sustains pluripotency by direct binding and activation of the Oct4 promoter (Han et al., 2010). Glis1 and Esg1 have multiple roles in stage specific differential gene expression in development. Stat3 and Klf4 displayed >50% of gene expression in neonatal kidney. Several cellular functions have been attributed to these genes even at mature cellular stage. Hence, these are the genetic switches, which are needed to maintain pluripotency as well as transformation of pluripotent state into adult states. These molecular switches can help in elucidating the regeneration mechanisms to repair kidney tissues.

The pattern of gene expression analyzed in this study suggested that nephron specific and pluripotency genes co-expressed in neonatal and in adult kidney to some extent. The reprogramming phase from MET is significantly reduced in adult rat kidney with the suppression of pluripotency and renal progenitor or neonatal genes. Over-expression of neonatal genes may provoke the reprogramming of the adult tissue. Understanding gene regulation in the developmental stages can help to develop ways not only to generate early kidney progenitor cells from other cell types for kidney repair but they can be maintained through certain protein expression before being transplanted in vivo to start their differentiation as cellular therapeutic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-expression of pluripotency genes and nephron specific genes are required for complete orchestration of events for the complete development of the rat kidney. During developmental stage, a transition state persists with advanced levels of expression of nephron specific genes, Wt1, Pax2, Cdh6, Six2 and HNF1β. However, pluripotency genes, Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2 also persist suggesting a dual role in self-maintenance and facilitating lineage specificity after induction of renal developmental genes. Regulators of pluripotency genes, Aicda, Glis1, Tbx3 and Dppa5 were expressed in the kidney with concomitant expression of specific kidney developmental genes, showing their unidentified role in nephrons. It can be suggested that renal regeneration potential may be due to the simultaneous expression of pluripotency and developmental genes for nephron lineage by mechanism opposing developmental stage i.e. epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Co-expression of nephron specific and pluripotency genes can initiate the repair and regeneration of the damaged kidney tissue while over-expression of neonatal specific genes may provoke the reprogramming of the adult injured tissue by co-existence of Aicda, Esg1/ Dppa5, Glis1 and Tbx3 gene expression.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

Angelotti, M.L., Ronconi, E., Ballerini, L., Peired, A., Mazzinghi, B., Sagrinati, C., Parente, E., Gacci, M., Carini, M., Rotondi, M., and Fogo, A.B., 2012. Characterization of renal progenitors committed toward tubular lineage and their regenerative potential in renal tubular injury. Stem Cells, 30:1714-1725. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1130

De Carvalho, D.D., You. J.S., and Jones, P.A., 2010. DNA methylation and cellular reprogramming. Trends Cell Biol., 20: 609-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.003

Dressler, G.R., 2008. Epigenetics, development, and the kidney. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 19: 2060-2067. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2008010119

Dressler, G.R., 2009. Advances in early kidney specification, development and patterning. Development, 136: 3863-3874. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.034876

Gumbiner, B.M., 2005. Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 6: 622-634. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1699

Gupta, S., Verfaillie, C., Chmielewski, D., Kren, S., Eidman, K., Connaire, J., Heremans, Y., Lund, T., Blackstad, M., Jiang, Y., and Luttun, A., 2006. Isolation and characterization of kidney-derived stem cells. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 17: 3028-3040. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006030275

Han, J., Yuan., P., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Soh, B.S., Li, P., Lim, S.L., Cao, S., Tay, J., Orlov, Y.L., and Lufkin, T., 2010. Tbx3 improves the germ-line competency of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature, 463: 1096-1100. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08735

Hendry, C., Rumballe B., Moritz K., and Little, M.H., 2011. Defining and redefining the nephron progenitor population. Pediatr. Nephrol., 26: 1395-1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-010-1750-4

Imgrund, M., Gröne, E., Gröne, H.J., Kretzler, M., Holzman, L., Schlöndorff, D., and Rothenpieler, U.W., 1999. Re-expression of the developmental gene Pax-2 during experimental acute tubular necrosis in mice1. Kidney Int., 56: 1423-1431. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00663.x

Kobayashi, A., Valerius, M.T., Mugford, J.W., Carroll, T.J., Self, M., Oliver, G., and McMahon, A.P., 2008. Six2 defines and regulates a multipotent self-renewing nephron progenitor population throughout mammalian kidney development. Cell Stem Cell, 3: 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.020

Lee, P.T., Lin, H.H., Jiang, S.T., Lu, P.J., Chou, K.J., Fang, H.C., Chiou, Y.Y., and Tang, M.J., 2010. Mouse kidney progenitor cells accelerate renal regeneration and prolong survival after ischemic injury. Stem Cells, 28: 573-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.310

Li, Y., and Wingert R.A., 2013. Regenerative medicine for the kidney: Stem cell prospects and challenges. Clin. Transl. Med., 2: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/2001-1326-2-11

Liu, Q.Z., Chen, X.D., Liu, G., and Guan, G.J., 2016. Identification and isolation of kidney-derived stem cells from transgenic rats with diphtheria toxin-induced kidney damage. Exp. Ther. Med., 12: 1651-1656. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3516

Miller-Hodges, E., and Hohenstein, P., 2012. Wt1 in disease: Shifting the epithelial mesenchymal balance. J. Pathol., 226: 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2977

Murphy, A.J, Pierce, J., de Caestecker, C., Taylor, C., Anderson, J.R., Perantoni, A.O., de, Caestecker, M.P., and Lovvorn, III. H.N., 2012. Six2 and CITED1, markers of nephronic progenitor self-renewal, remain active in primitive elements of Wilms’ tumor. J. Pediatr. Surg., 47: 1239-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.034

Ng, J.H., Heng, J.C., Loh, Y.H., and Ng, H.H., 2008. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulations of embryonic stem cells. Mutat. Res., 647: 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.08.009

Paces-Fessy, M., Fabre, M., Lesaulnier, C., and Cereghini, S., 2012. Hnf1b and Pax2 cooperate to control different pathways in kidney and ureter morphogenesis. Hum. mol. Genet., 21: 3143-3155. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/dds141

Pleniceanu, O., Harari-Steinberg, O., and Dekel, B., 2010. Concise review: Kidney stem/progenitor cells: Differentiate, sort out, or reprogram? Stem Cells, 28: 1649-1660. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.486

Popp, C., Dean, W., Feng, S., Cokus, S.J., Andrews, S., Pellegrini, M., Jacobsen, S.E., and Reik, W., 2010. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature, 463: 1101-1105. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08829

Rooney, K.M., Woolf, A.S., and Kimber, S.J., 2021. Towards modelling genetic kidney diseases with human pluripotent stem cells. Nephron, 26: 1-2.

Sallustio, F., De Benedictis, L., Castellano, G., Zaza, G., Loverre, A., Costantino, V., Grandaliano, G., and Schena, F.P., 2010. TLR2 plays a role in the activation of human resident renal stem/progenitor cells. FASEB J., 24: 514-525. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.09-136481

Skvarca, L.B., Han, H.I., Espiritu, E.B., Missinato, M.A., Rochon, E.R., McDaniels, M.D., Bais, A.S., Roman, B.L., Waxman, J.S., Watkins, S.C., and Davidson, A.J., 2019. Enhancing acute kidney injury regeneration by promoting cellular dedifferentiation in zebrafish. Dis. Model. Mech., 5: dmm-037390. https://doi.org/10.1101/434951

Wang, X., Xi, J., Jia, B., Zhang, Y., and Li, C., 2021. Expression of the ZFX gene in mouse kidney during postnatal development. Pakistan J. Zool., 53: 1867-1872. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20161103071158

Yamamura, Y., Furuichi, K., Murakawa, Y., Hirabayashi, S., Yoshihara, M., Sako, K., Kitajima, S., Toyama, T., Iwata, Y., Sakai, N., and Hosomichi, K., 2021. Identification of candidate Pax2-regulated genes implicated in human kidney development. Sci. Rep., 11: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88743-1

Zhao, W., Ji, X., Zhang, F., Li, L., and Ma, L., 2012. Embryonic stem cell markers. Molecules, 17: 6196-236. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17066196

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

February

Vol. 55, Iss. 1, Pages 1-500

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe