Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Multi-Locus Genetic Analysis in Silver Carp Populations of Indus River as Influenced by Restocking Programs

PJZ_56_5_2431-2439

Multi-Locus Genetic Analysis in Silver Carp Populations of Indus River as Influenced by Restocking Programs

Taqwa Safdar, Khalid Abbas*, Muhammad Sarfraz Ahmed, Hina Amjad, Sumra Naz and Jamal Kazam

Aquaculture Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad-38040, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

The genetic integrity of fish populations has been continuously threatened due to various anthropogenic actions, particularly restocking programs. These losses in genetic diversity present erosion of global biodiversity. The genetic status of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix in the Indus River was assessed by using microsatellite markers. For the purpose, samples were collected from five selective Indus River sites, and DNA extraction was done by proteinase-K and standard phenol/chloroform DNA isolation method. Genomic DNA was PCR amplified by Labeo rohita cross-species amplification of H. molitrix. The results showed a low-to-moderate level of genetic diversity. The number of alleles on each locus ranging from 2.0 to 6.0, with an average of 3.48 was observed at various loci. The average observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.664 to 0.76 and 0.631 to 0.664, respectively. For all tested loci, population combinations showed significant deviation (p<0.05) from HWE. The AMOVA indicated that most of the variation lied within individuals in populations of H. molitrix. Based on Nei’s genetic distance, UPGMA dendrogram was constructed that resulted in two clusters: one cluster consisted of JB and CB while other consisted of GG, GB and TB. The findings of this research will be useful for restoring, conservation and monitoring the natural aquatic fish species in Pakistan.


Article Information

Received 09 August 2021

Revised 22 May 2023

Accepted 03 June 2023

Available online 30 August 2023

(early access)

Published 14 August 2024

Authors’ Contribution

TS conducted the experiment and wrote manuscript. KA planned the research layout and finalized the manuscript. MSA and JK helped in collecting the fish individuals. SN and HA assisteed in results interpretation. All authors have read and approved the manuscript in its final form.

Key words

Restocking programs, Genetic diversity, Microsatellite markers, Natural aquatic species

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20210819150858

* Corresponding author: dr.abbas@uaf.edu.pk

0030-9923/2024/0005-2431 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2024 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

In a constantly changing environment, genetic diversity ensures the fitness of species by providing them the ability to face the natural selection pressure and ecological problems efficiently. Any species’ biological diversity depends upon its phenotypic plasticity as well as the ability of its populations to adopt the natural environment and human disruptions. During last few decades, the sustainability of fish species has affected severely due to various environmental hazards mainly floods, habitat loss, eutrophication and human interruptions such as dam construction, overfishing, pollution and introduction of new species (Vandewoestijne et al., 2008). Introduced fish species has played a considerable part in decrease and loss of native fish populations. As a consequence of these introductions in populations, diseases are spread that are extremely detrimental to the health of indigenous fish species. Local fish populations are also reduced due to inter-breeding and displacements after introducing non-native fish species (Qadeer, 2017).

A species native to China, silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) is now commonly cultured in Asia, contributing 22% (> 3 MMT) of global carp aquaculture production (FAO, 2005). Belonging to family Cyprinidae, silver carp is among the most valuable aquaculture fish species and is filter-feeding in nature (Fu and He, 2012). It is one of most intensively cultured species in China as well as worldwide. It has excellent values not only for food fish but also for biological control of cyanobacterial bloom formation in rivers, streams, reservoirs and ponds (Ke et al., 2009). Due to the rapid growth rate, easier cultivation, high feed efficiency ratio and high nutritional value, its commercial production has increased dramatically in the past few years. Annual worldwide silver carp production was 4.0 MMT (FAO, 2010), but according to recent statistics, it has gone beyond 10.0 MMT and is the second major aquaculture species produced across the world (FAO, 2018).

However, over-fishing and habitat fragmentation have significantly reduced the natural populations of silver carp in Asian countries. Due to long term propagation and improper broodstock management, production traits are also reduced (Shi et al., 2009). The disappearance of egg-laying and fry nursing grounds is also caused by rapid industrialization and corresponding aquatic pollution. Furthermore, the improper raising of fry has severely minimized the genomic heterozygosity of farmed silver carp, causing a decline and reduction in its growth performance. Besides this, the introgressive hybridization has become a usual problem between silver carp and its closely-associated bighead carp. Therefore, the genetic status of silver carp must be conserved and examined (Lamer et al., 2010).

Besides the ability to determine the relatedness among and within species, good natural populations need an observable ecology with environmental aspects likely to influence the individuals fitness. Estimation of species genetic variations is necessary for many reasons as it guarantees the fitness and development of a population in a constantly fluctuating environment. Therefore, the information is essential to circumvent the environmental damage and to make effective management for exploited populations (Ullah et al., 2015).

Molecular markers occur naturally; they are inherited inevitably, furnish a foundation for statistical data analysis and thus, they are preferably suitable for estimation of genetic status and variability in feral populations. Molecular markers are utilized to find out morphologically mysterious species, evaluate populations in regions of population socialization (Hauser et al., 2006), describe population boundaries and roots of juveniles in their lifetime migrations (Bowen et al., 2006). A promising benefit of molecular data is to assess population parameters, e.g. size of population (Turner et al., 2002), or to restructure demographic records of population development or bottlenecks in population size. Knowledge of responses of historic environmental or climatic disruptions can provide clues to how populations encounter with upcoming challenges. Data achieved by molecular markers are especially useful for assessment of kinship among individuals in fish populations (Banks et al., 2003), for determination of reproductive success and forensic identification (Birstein et al., 2000).

Among the molecular markers, microsatellite DNA markers have already been proved to be robust tools for population genetic analysis due to high abundance, even distribution throughout the genome, high polymorphism and amenability to PCR. The purpose of the study was to estimate the magnitude of genetic diversity in populations of H. molitrix in Indus River as well as to assess the current population status in H. molitrix stocks in Indus River.

Materials and Methods

Sampling and DNA isolation

Sampling of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (silver carp) was done from five particular sites of River Indus viz. Chashma Barrage (CB), Taunsa Barrage (TB), Guddu Barrage (GB), Ghazi Ghat (GG) as well as Jinnah Barrage (JB). Total 125 individuals were collected; 25 from each sampling site. The collected individuals were kept in ice and transported immediately to the laboratory where they were stored at -20°C. DNA extraction from dorsal muscle tissues was done by proteinase-K and standard phenol/chloroform DNA isolation methods of Sambrook and Russell (2001), with slight modifications.

The quality of extracted DNA was appraised through 0.8% AGE incorporated in TAE buffer with bromophenol blue loading dye. 1µL DNA sample was used for checking the concentration of isolated DNA by nanodrop. Concentration was adjusted at 50ng/µL for PCR by mixing the stock solution of DNA with nuclease-free water.

Amplification of targeted loci

Genomic DNA was PCR amplified by Labeo rohita cross-species amplification of H. molitrix. Five primers viz. Lr22, Lr40, Lr21, Lr38 and Lr12 were used taken from gene link (Singh et al., 2008). The microsatellite primers characteristics are given in Table I. PCR reaction was conducted in 25µL reaction mixture that contained the following ingredients: 2µl of each primer set, 12µl of PCR master mix 2X (Thermo Scientific, USA), 3µl of 50ng template DNA and 6µl nuclease-free water. The PCR cycles were as follows: Three min initial denaturation at 94°C followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 30 sec at a primer-specific annealing temperature for 1 min at 72°C, and final elongation for 4 min at 72°C.

Following the PCR amplification, the amplicons were confirmed for the amplification through 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR products were isolated on a 5% non-denaturing PAGE containing 19:1 acrylamide: bis-acrylamide and then visualized by silver staining method of Sanguinetti et al. (1994). Electrophoresis was carried out using a SequiGen sequencing gel electrophoresis method. For the visualization of DNA bands, silver-staining methods were used. After gel imaging in the gel documentation system (UVCI, Major Science, USA), the allelic bands were scored manually and compared with the mixed range DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific, USA) to determine the size of allelic bands.

 

Table I. SSR markers of H. molitrix with details.

S.

No

No. of locus

Repeat

sequence

Gene bank

accession No.

Sequence of primer (5`-3`)

Ta (°C)

No. of alleles

1

Lr12

(CA)13

AJ507524

F: CACCGCTGCTGTCCATCA

R: AGGTCGGCCAGATACACG

58

4

2

Lr21

(CA)11

AJ831436

F:GATCAGAGGGTCAATGTGG

R: CAGCAGAGTACTATGGAAGA

58

6

3

Lr22

(TG)19

AM285342

F: GATCTGTGTGTGTGTGTGC

R: GGTGGCGACACAACAAATG

58

4

4

Lr38

(GT)12

AM269528

F: ATAGCATCACCATCTGTTGGTG

R: TCTGCTTCAGTCACTCAGCAC

59

2

5

Lr40

(GT)15

AM269530

F: GATCAATCTTACAGTAATCTTG

R: AGACGGAGATATGATGAACTG

54

2

 

Genotypic data analyses

The microsatellite data set was analyzed for detecting probable genotyping errors (i.e. null-alleles, large allele dropout and stuttering bands) with the software Micro-Checker 2.2.1 (Oosterhout et al., 2004). To describe the genetic characteristics of a population, allele frequencies, number of alleles (Na), effective number of alleles (Nae), allelic richness (Ar), observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity, as well as inbreeding coefficient (FIS) were estimated with FSTAT Version 2.9.3.2 (Goudet, 2002).

Genetic divergence among populations was assessed with FST (Weir and Cockerham, 1984). By AMOVA, the hierarchical partition of genetic diversity was assessed using ARLEQUIN (Excoffier et al., 2005). Using software TFPGA Version 1.3 (Miller, 1997), UPGMA dendrogram based on Nei’s (1972) unbiased distance was assessed. Population structuring was also assessed with the software Structure 2.3.2 (Falush et al., 2003), using a burn-in length of 50,000 and 100,000 MCMC (Monte-Carlo Markov Chain) iterations. Five independent runs were conducted for each k-value and the number of genetic clusters was determined according to Evanno et al. (2005) with Structure Harvester (Earl and Vonholdt, 2012).

Results and Discussion

In the current study, the “Micro-Checker” software was applied to the genotypic data obtained for Hypophthalmichthys molitrix populations that showed no scoring errors related to large allele, stuttering bands and presence of null alleles at all the loci employed for genotyping. All H. molitrix populations had screened microsatellite loci that were found to be polymorphic. The patterns of genetic variability varied depending on the screened microsatellite loci and examined fish population.

Genetic diversity

Microsatellite diversity indices for each population have been outlined in Table II. The average allele frequency and allele size ranging from 0.004 to 0.552 and 140 to 174bp, respectively were observed at various screened loci in H. molitrix populations. All the loci were found to be polymorphic. The number of alleles (Na) and allelic richness (Ar) per locus ranging from 2.00 to 7.00, with an average of 3.2 to 3.4 and 3.2 to 3.4, respectively, were observed. Regarding the number of alleles and allelic richness, the largest average value was calculated in the population of GB as well as TB and minimum in the population of GG. The average values of effective number of alleles (Nae) were observed ranging from 2.404 to 3.02 in various studied H. molitrix populations.

Heterozygosity (H) level was observed moderate in all examined H. molitrix populations. The average observed heterozygosity (HO) were measured ranging from 0.56 to 0.816. The fish population JB revealed the lowest value of HO and GB population showed the highest value as compared to others. Average values of expected heterozygosity (He) were measured, ranging from 0.58 to 0.649. The largest He value was observed for TB population whereas the lowest for JB population.

The values of 1-Ho/He were found positive mostly at all the screened SSR loci with exception at some loci where negative values were also observed. On the average base, populations showed positive average values for 1-Ho/He except one population, i.e. CB.

On average, the inbreeding coefficient (FIS) values were found to be positive, except one population CB that showed negative mean value. FIS values ranging from -0.149 to 0.088 were recorded at various screened SSR loci. Highest average FIS value was measured for TB (0.088) while the lowest for CB (-0.149) population of H. molitrix. The mean values of FIS in GG, JB and GB were observed as 0.013, 0.016 and 0.036, respectively.

 

Table II. Genetic diversity at different SSR loci in H. molitrix populations collected from riverine sites.

Population

Parameters

Loci

Average

Lr-12

Lr-21

Lr-22

Lr-38

Lr-40

JB

Na

3.000

7.000

3.000

2.000

2.000

3.4

Ar

3.000

6.880

3.000

2.000

2.000

3.376

Nae

2.723

2.777

2.777

1.854

1.891

2.404

Ho

0.720

0.440

0.560

0.560

0.520

0.56

He

0.645

0.653

0.653

0.470

0.480

0.58

1-Ho/He

-0.116

0.326

0.142

-0.191

-0.083

0.016

FIS

-0.118

0.331

0.145

-0.196

-0.083

0.016

PHWE

0.434NS

0.421NS

0.421NS

0.409NS

1.000NS

TB

Na

4

5

4

2

2

3.4

Ar

4

4.999

4

2

2

3.4

Nae

3.644

3.655

3.834

1.996

1.971

3.02

Ho

0.64

0.6

0.64

0.72

0.72

0.72

He

0.74

0.741

0.754

0.509

0.502

0.649

1-Ho/He

0.135

0.19

0.151

0.414

-0.434

0.091

FIS

0.106

0.194

0.122

-0.426

0.445

0.088

PHWE

1.000NS

0.421NS

0.150NS

0.410NS

0.043*

--

GG

Na

3

5

4

2

2

3.2

Ar

3

4.999

4

2

2

3.2

Nae

2.302

3.709

3.041

1.996

2

2.61

Ho

0.52

0.72

0.68

0.56

0.6

0.616

He

0.577

0.745

0.684

0.509

0.51

0.605

1-Ho/He

0.098

0.033

0.005

0.1

-0.176

0.012

FIS

0.101

0.035

0.007

0.102

-0.18

0.013

PHWE

1.000NS

0.082NS

0.010*

0.699NS

0.440NS

--

CB

Na

3

6

4

2

2

3.4

Ar

3

5.96

4

2

2

3.392

Nae

2.51

4.058

3.698

1.891

1.923

2.816

Ho

0.52

0.76

0.72

0.6

0.8

0.68

He

0.613

0.769

0.744

0.48

0.489

0.619

1-Ho/He

0.151

0.011

0.032

-0.25

-0.635

-0.138

FIS

0.156

0.012

-0.002

-0.254

-0.655

-0.149

PHWE

1.000NS

0.190NS

0.675NS

0.392NS

0.002**

--------

GB

Na

4

5

4

2

2

3.4

Ar

4

5

4

2

2

3.4

Nae

3.731

4.18

2.997

1.987

1.95

2.969

Ho

0.84

0.92

0.88

0.92

0.52

0.816

He

0.746

0.776

0.68

0.506

0.497

0.641

1-Ho/He

-0.126

-0.185

-0.294

0.818

-0.046

0.033

FIS

-0.128

-0.19

-0.302

0.846

-0.047

0.036

PHWE

1.000NS

0.183NS

0.115NS

0.001*

1.000NS

--

 

Na, number of alleles; Ar, allelic richness; Nae, effective number of alleles; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; Fis, inbreeding cofficient values; CB, Chasma Barrage; TB, Taunsa Barrage; GB, Guddu Barrage; GG, Ghazi Ghat, JB, Jinnah Barrage.

 

Out of 25 tests, a total of 4 tests were found to deviate from HWE significantly after applying multiple test correction. At various screened loci, the pairwise p-value was found significant at p < 0.05.

Population genetic structure

Using windows-based program FSTAT, the pair-wise population differentiation (FST) across all the screened microsatellite loci among various H. molitrix populations was analyzed and found to be significant (P<0.05) statistically between most of the population pairs. The significant findings regarding population genetic differentiation for most of the stocks revealed genetically non-homogenous groups. The pair-wise estimates of FST indicated a moderate level of population genetic differentiation among the studied H. molitrix populations. Highest level of differentiation was found 0.0724 in GG-GB, while the lowest 0.0084 between the populations of CB and JB.

Using the windows-based software TFPGA, the genetic distance (GD) was calculated based on the allele frequency data by considering all the examined populations. Among pairs of populations, the unbiased genetic distance indicated considerable variation (P<0.05) in magnitude. The highest value of genetic distance was examined 0.1226 in JB-GB while, the minimum 0.0115 between the TB-GB, as shown in Table III.

 

Table III. Nei’s unbiased genetic distance (below diagonal) and pairwise population differentiation (FST) (above diagonal) between populations of H. molitrix.

Populations

GG

CB

JB

TB

GB

GG

--

0.0396*

0.0432*

0.0196*

0.0724

CB

0.0210

--

0.0084**

0.0179*

0.0116*

JB

0.0678

0.0280

--

0.0143*

0.0122*

TB

0.0115

0.0287

0.0640

--

0.0287*

GB

0.0143

0.0440

0.1226

0.0154

--

 

*Significant at P<0.05. For abbreviations see Table II.

 

Table IV. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) table for H. molitrix populations.

SOV

df

MSS

Variance

% Variation

Between populations

4

8.502

0.1388

6.7839

Between individuals

within populations

120

1.559

0.3481

17.0112

Within individuals

125

2.256

2.2560

76.205

 

The AMOVA indicated low variation percentage (17.0112%) between individuals within populations and revealed that most of the variation (76.205%) lied within the individuals. The AMOVA further specified that 6.7839% variation was contributed due to the variation between populations in this study (Table IV).

Across all the screened microsatellite loci, the gene flow (Nm) rate in various examined populations of H. molitrix was measured by using the windows-based program. The largest value of Nm was observed 13.2605 at locus Lr-38 while the lowest value of Nm was noted 4.1487 at locus Lr-22. Overall SSR loci, the average value of Nm was observed 8.0037 (Table V).

 

Table V. Gene flow (Nm) at different SSR loci in H. molitrix populations.

Locus

Sample size

Nm

Lr-12

250

8.1440

Lr-21

250

5.6312

Lr-22

250

4.1487

Lr-38

250

13.2605

Lr-40

250

8.8343

Mean

250

8.0037

 

 

Genetic relatedness was further investigated by constructing UPGMA dendrogram (Fig. 1). Two major clusters or clades A and B were observed which predict that the populations in both clusters had shown a close relationship. Cluster A further divided into cluster A1 and A2. The riverine population of H. molitrix CB was present in cluster A1 while, the population of JB in the cluster A2. Cluster B was divided further into B1 and B2. B1 was further clustered in two groups containing TB and GG whereas B2 consisted of GB.

For the populations of H. molitrix, microsatellite data analyses by the Structure grouping algorithm method proposed the occurrence of two discrete genetic clusters. For each K value, constant results were obtained across the 6 autonomous runs. Structure Harvester admixture model inferences showed highest estimated log-likelihood mean value and delta-k value for K= 2 in this study (Fig. 2).

 

Discussion

The assessment of genetic diversity in aquaculture or wild fish stocks is essential for effective management, interpretation and conservation of fish stocks (Hallerman, 2003). Genetic diversity enables the ecological adaptations to ensure the chances of survival of a single species or a population and is thought to be vital for the survival of a species. Due to direct and indirect anthropogenic activities, biodiversity has been subjected to restrictions. Reducing the sites of natural populations may have resulted in reduced evolutionary options in the face of environmental modifications owing to the loss of genetic diversity (Artoni et al., 2009). Most of the fish used for human consumption come from wild sources such as rivers and major lentic water bodies (Saini et al., 2008; Agostinho et al., 2008); therefore, natural stocks are at risk. The commercial fishing in natural stocks has caused genetic depletion that is peculiar to fisheries management and the line of the genetic resources of natural fish populations has now become a major issue in fisheries management (Yilmaz and Okumuu, 2002).

The current study was designed to underpin the genetic diversity of H. molitrix in Indus River by using molecular markers. The protocols followed were fairly efficient for the genomic DNA isolation from muscle tissues, its analysis and successive PCR-based genotyping of the fish individuals at target loci. SSR markers have proven to be very robust for determining genetic status of H. molitrix in sampled populations. With countless applications in population genetics, conservation biology, and evolutionary biology, microsatellites are the most common and diverse genetic markers (Muneer, 2014). Liu and Cordes (2004) emphasized the significance of molecular markers in aquaculture genetics as they make genetic variability observable throughout the genome.

In the current study, allelic diversity level was observed low-to-moderate in H. molitrix, ranging from 2.0 to 7.0. When compared to our study, Liao et al. (2007) revealed number of alleles varying from 4 up to a maximum of 15 in H. molitrix by using the same markers. The obvious basis for reduced allelic diversity in H. molitrix population is the invasiveness as the species is not native to Pakistan and has recently been introduced in the country. The genetic status of the silver carp populations was also assessed by Ji et al. (2009) by using SSR markers and they reported that conventional breeding approaches in hatcheries has resulted in allelic loss primarily owing to low effective population size.

The average value of effective number of alleles in the H. molitrix populations, ranging from 2.40 to 3.02, was examined. In the fish population sampled from TB, the highest value of Nae was noted while the lowest in the JB population. Compared with the observed number of alleles, less Nae was noted indicating loss of alleles in different populations examined. When the actual number of alleles is greater in value relative to the effective number of alleles, which shows that all allele frequencies are not equivalent. Using microsatellite markers, limited effective number of alleles was reported in C. catla by Hansen et al. (2006).

In this study, the average values of observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.56 up to a maximum of 0.816. The fish population taken from JB showed the least Ho whereas GB population showed the maximum value as compared to others. The decreased levels of Ho in the riverine populations might correspond to the restocking programs (Zhou et al., 2011).

The FIS values were found positive on the average in all the populations, except for the population CB which exhibited negative mean values. In this study, the highest average FIS value was noted in population TB while the lowest in CB population. Negative mean FIS value in CB population indicated the excessive heterozygosity and revealed that this population does not lose heterozygosity and the individuals in this population could be termed as outbred. Positive FIS values verify the excessive homozygosity and significant deviation in a population from the HWE (Zhang et al., 2015).

After applying multiple test correction, a total of 4 tests out of 25 were examined to deviate significantly from HWE. The deviation from HWE could primarily be attributed to heterozygote deficiencies, inbreeding and the existence of null alleles (Adams et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2013). Any deviation from HWE may show stratification of the population, genotyping issues as well as inbreeding. Li et al. (2010) and Keller et al. (2013) reported the similar results for an extensive range of 126 freshwater fish species.

In current study, pair-wise estimates of FST showed moderate population genetic differentiation among the H. molitrix populations studied. Maximum level of differentiation was found to be 0.0724 in the population GG-GB while, the minimum 0.0084 between the CB and JB. Dissimilar genetic origin was indicated by the highest level of genetic differentiation, while the lowest suggested similar genetic origin of these populations. Limited dispersal potential between freshwater fish exists due to anthropogenic activities, which becomes the reason for prominent genetic differentiation levels. Different evolutionary forces including individual migration, random genetic drift, mutual interactions or DNA mutation also affect the patterns of genetic distribution and genetic structure among populations. Ou et al. (2009) reported the low-to-moderate level of genetic differentiation in natural stocks of Ctenopharyngodon idella. Similar results were given by Zhu et al. (2015) in H. nobilis and Zhang et al. (2007) in C. idella.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) is an appropriate standard for evaluating the population genetic structure and determining genetic similarity and differentiation between populations (Excoffier, 2001). The AMOVA suggested that the majority of variations exist within individuals in riverine populations of H. molitrix. Chaturvedi et al. (2011) and Gopalakrishnan et al. (2009) detected similar patterns of genetic structuring in other freshwater fish species in aquatic systems of the region.

On the basis of Nei’s unbiased genetic distance in the H. molitrix populations, the UPGMA dendrogram was constructed to investigate the genetic relationship in them. Partially following their geographic distribution, the dendrogram grouped the populations into two utmost groups showing their genetic relatedness. Despite greater geographic distance, populations in the same cluster with restricted genetic distance show the broodstock management patterns of the fisheries department in the province. This is due to the paucity of a genetic management plan in Pakistan for fish genetic resources (Haque and Hoq, 2016).

Conclusion

To minimize the genetic effects, it is just necessary to enhance the genetic management related to aquatic species by examining the genetic integrity. Meanwhile, many H. molitrix alleles are at risk of extinction. For the conservation of natural sources and preventing the alleles from damaging, we just need to strengthen the monitoring and conservation of riverine resources; this can make the H. molitrix populations much stronger and overfishing must be prohibited in natural water system. The findings of this research will be useful for restoring, conservation and monitoring the natural aquatic fish species in Pakistan. To preserve the genetic integrity of H. molitrix, there is a dire need to develop a great genetic management policy.

AcknowledgementS

The authors are grateful to Dr. Tanveer Ahmed for his valuable guidance and contributions during the manuscript preparation.

Funding

The current study was partially supported by the project NRPU# 20-2074/R&D/11, funded by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.

IRB approval

IRB was obtained from Institutional Biosafety and Bioethic Committee (IBC), Department of Zoology,Wildlife & Fisheries. UAF, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.

Ethics statement

This work was carried out by following all the guidelines of National Biosafety 2005, Punjab Biosafety Rules 2014 and Punjab Animal Health Act 2019.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Adams, B.M., Bertrand, K.N., Brown, M.L. and Auger, D., 2011. Genetic structure of Grass Carp populations in the Missouri and Mississippi River Basins, USA. Prairie Nat., 43: 84-91.

Agostinho, A.A., Pelicice, F.M. and Gomes, L.C., 2008. Dams and the fish fauna of the Neotropical region: Impacts and management related to diversity and fisheries. Braz. J. Biol., 68: 1119-1132. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842008000500019

Artoni, R.F., Vicari, M.R., Almeida, M.C., Moreira-Filho, O. and Bertollo, L.A.C., 2009. Karyotype diversity and fish conservation of southern field from South Brazil. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 19: 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-009-9109-2

Banks, M.A., Eichert, W. and Olsen, J.B., 2003. Which genetic loci have greater population assignment power. Bioinformatics, 19: 1436-1438. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg172

Birstein, V.J., Doukakis, P. and DeSalle, R., 2000. Polyphyly of mtDNA lineages in the Russian sturgeon, Acipenser gueldenstaedtii forensic and evolutionary implications. Conserv. Genet., 1: 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010141906100

Bowen, B.W., Grant, W.S., Hillis, Z.S., Shaver, D.J., Bjorndal, K.A., Bolten, A.B. and Bass, A.L., 2006. Mixed-stock analysis reveals the migrations of juvenile hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) in the Caribbean Sea. Mol. Ecol., 16: 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03096.x

Chaturvedi, A., Mohindra, V., Singh, R.K., Lal, K.K., Punia, P., Bhaskar, R., Mandal, A., Narain, L. and Lakra, W.S., 2011. Population genetic structure and phylogeography of cyprinid fish, Labeo dero (Hamilton, 1822) inferred from allozyme and microsatellite DNA marker analysis. Mol. Biol. Rep., 38: 3513-3529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-010-0462-y

Earl, D.A. and Vonholdt, B.M., 2012. Structure harvester: A website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour., 4: 359-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. and Goudet, J., 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol., 14: 2611-2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x

Excoffier, L., 2001. Analysis of population subdivision. Volume I: Handbook of statistical genetics: 1st edn. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

Excoffier, L., Laval, G. and Schneider, S., 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinf., 1: 47-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/117693430500100003

Falush, D., Stephens, M. and Pritchard, J.K., 2003. Inference of population structure: Extensions to linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics, 164: 1567-1587. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/164.4.1567

FAO, 2005. Fishstat plus, version 2.30. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

FAO, 2010. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

FAO, 2018. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Fu, B. and He, S., 2012. Transcriptome analysis of Silver Carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) by paired-end RNA sequencing. DNA Res., 19: 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsr046

Gopalakrishnan, A., Musammilu, K.K., Basheer, V.S., John, L., Padmakumar, K.G., Lal, K.K., Mohindra, V., Punia, P., Dinesh, K., Manjebrayakath, H., Ponniah, A.G. and Lakra, W.S., 2009. Low genetic differentiation in the populations of the Malabar Carp Labeo dussumieri as revealed by allozymes, microsatellites and RAPD. Asian Fish. Sci., 22: 359-391. https://doi.org/10.33997/j.afs.2009.22.2.001

Goudat, J., 2002. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices, Version 2.9.3.2. Institute of Ecology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

Guo, W., Yu, X. and Tong, J., 2013. Development of 134 novel polynucleotide-repeat microsatellite markers in silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Conserv. Genet. Resour., 5: 525-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-012-9843-y

Hallerman, E.M., 2003. Population genetics: Principles and applications for fisheries scientists: 1st edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.

Hansen, M.M., Simonsen, V., Mensberg, K.L.D., Sarder, M.R.I. and Alam, M.S., 2006. Loss of genetic variation in hatchery reared Indian major Carp, Catla catla. J. Fish Biol., 69: 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01285.x

Haque, N. and Hoq, T., 2016. Deterioration of genetic diversity: Concern in hatchery populations of Catla (Catla catla, Hamilton 1822: Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae) of Sylhet district in Bangladesh. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. appl. Sci., 5: 171-181. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.512.019

Hauser, L., Seamons, R., Dauer, M., Naish, K.A. and Quinn, T.P., 2006. An empirical verification of population assignment methods by marking and parentage data: Hatchery and wild steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Forks Creek, Washington, United States of America. Mol. Ecol., 153: 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03017.x

Ji, C.H., Gu, J.J., Mao, R.X., Zhu, X.P. and Sun, X.W., 2009. Analysis of genetic diversity among wild silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) populations in the Yangtze, Heilongjiang and Pearl Rivers using microsatellite markers. J. Fish. China, 3: 364-371.

Ke, Z.X., Xie, P. and Guo, L.G., 2009. Impacts of two bio-manipulation fishes stocked in a large pen on the plankton abundance and water quality during a period of phytoplankton seasonal succession. Ecol. Eng., 35: 1610-1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.01.006

Keller, I., Wagner, C.E., Greuter, L., Mwaiko, S., Selz, O.M., Sivasundar, A., Wittwer, S. and Seehausen, O., 2013. Population genomic signatures of divergent adaptation, gene flow and hybrid speciation in the rapid radiation of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes. Mol. Ecol., 22: 2848-2863. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12083

Lamer, J.T., Dolan, C.R., Petersen, J.L., Chick, J.H. and Epifanio, J.M., 2010. Introgressive hybridization between bighead carp and silver carp in the mississippi and Illinois rivers. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag., 30: 1452-1461. https://doi.org/10.1577/M10-053.1

Li, S.F., Yang, Q.L., Xu, J.W., Wang, C.H., Chen, Q., Chapman, D.C. and Lu, G., 2010. Genetic diversity and variation of mitochondrial DNA in native and introduced bighead carp. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 139: 937-946. https://doi.org/10.1577/T09-158.1

Liao, M., Zhang, L., Yang, G., Zhu, M., Wang, D., Wei, Q., Zou, G. and Chen, D., 2007. Development of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) genetic maps using microsatellite and AFLP markers and a pseudo-testcross strategy. Anim. Genet., 38: 364-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01617.x

Liu, Z.J. and Cordes, J.F., 2004. DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquaculture, 238: 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.05.027

Miller, M.P., 1997. Tools for population genetic analyses (TFPGA) V l.3: A windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular genetic data. Northern Arizona, University, Flagstaff.

Muneer, A.P.M., 2014. Application of microsatellite markers in conservation genetics and fisheries management: Recent advances in population structure analysis and conservation strategies. Genet. Res. Int., 2: 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/691759

Nei, M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat., 106: 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1086/282771

Oosterhout, C.V., Hutchinson, W.F., Wills, D.P.M. and Shipley, P., 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 4: 535-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x

Ou, L., Ying-Ying, Z., Na, G., Cui-Yun, L., Xiao-Wen, S., 2009. Effects of sample size and loci number on genetic diversity in wild population of grass carp revealed by SSR. Zool. Res., 30: 121-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1141.2009.02121

Qadeer, I., 2017. Microsatellite markers based genetic structure of Rohu (Labeo rohita) in selected riverine populations of Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. J. agric. Sci., 54: 865-872. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/17.5736

Saini, A., Dua, A. and Mohindra, V., 2008. Comparative morphometrics of two populations of giant river catfish (Mystus seenghala) from the Indus river system. Integr. Zool., 3: 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2008.00099.x

Sambrook, J. and Russell, D.W., 2001. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual: 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, USA.

Sanguinetti, C.J., Neto, E.D. and Simpson, A.J.G., 1994. Rapid silver staining and recovery of PCR products separated in polyacrylamide gels. Biotechniques, 17: 915-919.

Shi, W.G., Zhang, M.Y., Liu, K., Xu, D.P. and Duan, J.R., 2009. Stress of hydraulic engineering on fisheries in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River and compensation. J. Lake Sci., 21: 10-20. https://doi.org/10.18307/2009.0102

Singh, R.K., Lal, K.K., Mohindra, V., Punia, P. and Lakra, W.S., 2008. Cross-species amplification of microsatellite loci in the cyprinid fish, Labeo calbasu (Hamilton, 1822). Acta Zool. Sin, 54: 937-940.

Turner, T.F., Wares, J.P. and Gold, J.R., 2002. Genetic effective size is three orders of magnitude smaller than adult census size in abundant, estuarine-dependent marine fish (Sciaenops ocellatus). Genetics, 162: 1329-1339. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/162.3.1329

Ullah, A., Basak, A., Islam, M.N. and Alam, M.S., 2015. Population genetic characterization and family reconstruction in brood bank collections of the Indian major carp, Labeo rohita (Cyprinidae: Cypriniformes). Springer Plus, 4: 774-782. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1571-9

Vandewoestijne, S., Schtickzelle, N. and Baguette, M., 2008. Positive correlation between genetic diversity and fitness in a large, well-connected metapopulation. BMC Biol., 6: 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-6-46

Weir, B.S. and Cockerham, C.C., 1984. Estimating F statistics for analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38: 1358-1370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x

Yilmaz, C. and Okumuu, O., 2002. Characterization of genetic variance within and among five populations of Sperata seenghala (Skyes, 1839) revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Turk. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 2: 145-155.

Zhang, M., Nie, J., Shen, Y., Xu, X., Dang, Y., Wang, R. and Li, J., 2015. Isolation and characterization of 25 novel EST-SNP markers in Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Conserv. Genet. Res., 7: 819-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-015-0491-x

Zhang, Z.W., Han, Y.P., Zhong, X.M., Zhang, Z.Y., Cao, Z.M. and We, D.D., 2007. Genetic structure analyses of grass carp populations between wild and cultured ones. J. Fish. China, 14: 720-725.

Zhou, G., Zhao, X., Bi, Y. and Hu Z., 2011. Effects of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) on spring phytoplankton community structure of three Gorges reservoir (China): Results from an enclosure experiment. J. Limnol., 70: 26-32. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2011.26

Zhu, C., Tong, J., Yu, X. and Guo, W., 2015. Comparative mapping for Bighead Carp (Aristichthys nobilis) against model and non-model fishes provides insights into the genomic evolution of cyprinids. Mol. Genet. Genom., 290: 1313-1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-015-0992-z

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

August

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56, Iss. 4, pp. 1501-2000

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe