Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Evaluation of Bacterial Contamination From Raw and Cooked Fish, Mutton and Beef Sold by Local Vendors in Hyderabad, Pakistan

Evaluation of Bacterial Contamination From Raw and Cooked Fish, Mutton and Beef Sold by Local Vendors in Hyderabad, Pakistan

Sadaf Ansari1, Shahid Hussain Abro1, Abdul Jabbar Tanweer2, Abdullah Sethar3, Ghulam Abbas4, Sabahat Ansari1, Asghar Ali Kamboh1* 

1Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan; 2Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan; 3Livestock and Fisheries Department, Government of Sindh, Hyderabad, Pakistan; 4Riphah College of Veterinary Sciences, Riphah International University, Lahore Pakistan.

*Correspondence | Asghar Ali Kamboh, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan; Email: drasgharkamboh@yahoo.com 

ABSTRACT

Foodborne pathogens are spreading to humans through contamination of raw and cooked meat because of its inappropriate processing, handling and cooking. Therefore this research was performed for the evaluation of bacterial contamination from raw and cooked fish, mutton and beef sold by retailors in district Hyderabad. During present study, 150 total meat samples, 100 from raw meat (beef=40, mutton=40, fish=20) and 50 from cooked meat (beef=20, mutton=20, fish=10) were randomly collected from district Hyderabad and cultured on different media for isolation of bacterial species. The isolated species were identified by different biochemical tests. The results showed that the contamination of bacterial organisms in both raw and cooked meat was highest in beef followed by mutton and fish respectively (p < 0.05). In raw meat, bacterial species recorded were Escherichia coli (45%, 30% and 25%), Salmonella enteritidis (20%, 17.5% and 15%), Staphylococcus aureus (30%, 25% and 25%), Bacillus cereus (12.5%, 10% and 10%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (15%, 10% and 0%) and Shigella dysenteriae (10%, 12.5% and 5%) in beef, mutton and fish respectively. While from cooked beef, mutton and fish the prevalence of E. coli (25%, 25% and 20%), S. aureus (15%, 15% and 10%), S. enteritidis and B. cereus (10%, 10% and 10%) were observed. The highest (p < 0.05) bacterial load (g­¹) was detected in raw (1.76×106) and cooked (6.1×104) beef than raw (1.55×106) and cooked (4.5×104) mutton respectively, while raw (1.25×106) and cooked (2.9×104) fish exhibited the least (p < 0.05) bacterial load than other raw and cooked meat (beef and mutton) respectively. Data regarding antimicrobial susceptibility exhibited that among eight antibiotics E. coli, S. enteritidis, S. aureus and B. cereus were observed sensitive to gentamycin, norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin. K. pneumoniae showed sensitivity against gentamycin, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, tetracycline and streptomycin; whereas S. dysenteriae was observed sensitive to gentamycin, norfloxacin, tetracycline and ampicillin. In conclusion, raw beef samples were found more contaminated than raw fish and mutton while cooked fish samples were observed less contaminated than cooked beef and mutton. Furthermore, all bacterial isolates (except K. pneumoniae) were found multidrug resistant.

Keywords | Microbial load, Raw fish, Cooked meat, Beef, Foodborne pathogens 

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Journal of Animal Health and Production

October

Vol. 11, Iss. 3, Pages 234-329

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe