Research Article

Effects of Supplementing Fresh Garlic on Growth and Meat Production of Minhdu Chicken

Nguyen Thi Ngoc Trang1, Nguyen Thi Thu Hong2,3*

1Faculty of Natural Resources - Environment, Kien Giang University, Vietnam; 2An Giang University, An Giang, Vietnam; 3Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Received | July 25, 2024; Accepted | August 29, 2024; Published | October 05, 2024

*Correspondence | Nguyen Thi Thu Hong, An Giang University, An Giang, Vietnam; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Trang NTN, Hong NTT (2024). Effects of supplementing fresh garlic on growth and meat production of minhdu chicken. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 12(11): 2234-2238.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.11.2234.2238

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331

Copyright: 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

INTRODUCTION

Minh Du chicken (Gallus gallus L.; Lawal and Hanotte, 2021) production is developing in Viet Nam, giving high economic efficiency for producers. Minh Du chicken is a new coloured broiler strain of the native Mia chicken breed. Adding growth stimulants and antibiotics to chicken diets is known to negatively impacts on consumers’ health. Using probiotics, prebiotics, enzymes as supplements in chicken diet is suggested to increase development rate, diet conversion effectiveness as well the improvement of meat quality (Mund et al., 2017; Sapsuha et al., 2021; Rahman et al., 2022).

Herbal supplements, including garlic, present a potentially sustainable solution, offering locally available, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly alternatives that pose no risk to human health. Garlic (Allium sativum L.) contains bioactive compounds such as allicin, alliin, ajoene, vinyldithiins, and flavonoids, which have well-documented antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and immune-boosting properties (Demir et al., 2005; Amagase, 2006). While garlic supplementation has been studied in commercial broiler breeds, there is a lack of research specifically targeting its effects on the growth performance and meat quality of Minh Du chickens.

This study providing insights the impact of fresh garlic supplementation on growth capacity and meat production in Minh Du broilers, contribute to more sustainable environment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Location and Time

The experiment was conducted from February to April 2022, on an experimental farm of An Giang University in Long Xuyen city, An Giang province (Vietnam).

Experimental Design and Feeds and Feeding

A total of 120 Minh Du chickens at 28 days old with similar initial body weights were randomly divided into five treatments with three replicates, with 10 chicks for each unit (5 male and 5 female bird). Chickens received basal diets without (GARL0, Control) or with the addition of 1% (GARL1), 2% (GARL2), and 3% (GARL3) of fresh garlic (calculate in fresh) in the ration throughout the experimental period (start experiment chicken age: 28 days old; end experiment chicken age: 98 days old). Water and feed were offered ad libitum according to the chickens’ need. They have been vaccinated against contagious diseases.

 

Table 1: Chemical compositions of basal diet (% DM).

Item	%/DM
DM	90.7
Crude protein	19.7
OM	94.6
EE	5.1
CF	5.0

 

Fresh garlic was purchased once from a local market and stored in a dry environment. The ingredients were washed, peeled and cut into 1 mm thick slices. They were then ground into powder and fed to chickens. Fresh garlic were prepared and used daily. The chemical composition of the concentrate (commercial) used in the experiment is shown in Table 1. The nutritional composition of the basic diet is designed to meet the nutritional requirements of chickens at each growth stage (McDonald et al., 2011).

Experimental bird were confined in pens with 2.0 m2/10 bird and floor barn, which were surrounded by iron net and its floor was overlaid with 20 cm of rice husk (Figure 1). This rice husk layer is enriched in bacteria to treat chicken manure.

 

Measurements Taken

The initial body weight (BW) of the bird at 28 days old, as well as the ending body weight at 98 days old, was recorded to calculate average daily gain (ADG). The average daily feed intake (ADFI) was determined on a fresh basis as the difference between the quantity of feed offered and the leftovers. The feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as the ratio of the ADFI to the ADG. The viability thoroughly of the chickens was also monitored.

Carcass values: 2 birds (1 male and 1 female) per each experimental unit were slaughtered for the evaluation of carcass traits. The pH of breast muscles was measured by digital pH meter (Hanna HI 2550-02) 45 min after slaughter for pH0 and 24 h after slaughter for pH24 (Sopian et al., 2020). The left part of each breast muscle sample was trimmed to a dimension of 2.0 x 1.0 x 0.5 cm. Each piece was weighed (weight before storage = W1) and put into a sealed plastic bag, with drip loss stored at a chilled temperature (4o C) for 24 h. The sample was then removed from the sealed plastic bag, blotted, and weighed (W2 is the weight after storage). Drip loss was calculated as a percentage of weight loss ((W1- W2))/ W1) x 100 (Sopian et al., 2020). To determine cooking loss, breast muscle sample was measured after being heated in a water bath at 80o C for 10 min. After cooking, the sample was cooled to room temperature and weighed (W3 is the weight after cooking). Cooking loss was calculated as a percentage of weight loss ((W1- W3))/ W1) x 100 (Sopian et al., 2020). The samples of breast meat were analyzed by AOAC (2005) methods for: dry matter (DM) by drying at 1050C for 24h; organic matter (OM) by ashing at 5500C for 4h; and crude protein (CP) by Kjeldahl technique.

 

Table 2: Growth performance of Minhdu chickens as affected by levels of dietary fresh garlic supplementation.

Parameter	GARL0	GARL1	GARL2	GARL3	SEM	P
Initial body weight (kg)	0.51	0.51	0.51	0.49	0.001	0.477
Final body weight (kg)	1.92c	1.95bc	2.00b	2.07a	0.01	0.001
ADG (g/bird/day)	20.19b	20.48b	21.29b	22.52a	0.25	0.003
ADFI (g/bird/day)	66.95	65.95	66.00	65.57	0,77	0.641
FCR (kg feed/kg gain)	3.32a	3.22a	3.10ab	2.91b	0.05	0.002

 

ADG: Average daily gain; ADFI: Average daily feed intake. Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).

 

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed with a the General Linear Model option in the Minitab Reference Manual Release 16 (Minitab, 2010) was used and subjected to an analysis of variance (ANOVA).

The correlation between pH values, drip loss, cooking loss and chemicals of breast meat of Minhdu chicken has been checked with a Spearman correlation plot in the corrplot package (Taiyun and Simko, 2021) in R software environment, version 4.3.1 (R Core Team, 2023).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Growth Performance

The results presented in Table 2 demonstrate the significant impact of fresh garlic supplementation on the growth performance of Minhdu chickens. Chickens fed diets supplemented with fresh garlic exhibited greater body weight and weight gain compared to those on the control diet. Notably, chickens receiving a 3% dietary inclusion of fresh garlic achieved the highest body weight and weight gain, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The final body weights at 98 days of age for the GARL0, GARL1, GARL2, and GARL3 groups were 1.92, 1.95, 2.00, and 2.07 kg/bird, respectively (P<0.05). Average daily gain (ADG) followed a similar pattern, with the GARL3 group recording the highest ADG (22.52 g/bird/day), followed by GARL2, GARL1, and GARL0 (P<0.05). These findings align with the study by Jamel et al. (2013), which reported that garlic stimulates the intestinal cells of chickens, aiding in the regulation of endogenous digestive enzyme secretion and fostering a balanced intestinal ecosystem that promotes growth. Interestingly, feed intake did not significantly differ among the groups (P>0.05), suggesting that the improved growth performance observed in the GARL3 group is directly attributable to the garlic supplementation rather than increased feed consumption.

Although feed intake remained consistent across treatment groups, ranging from 65.57 to 66.95 g/bird/day (P>0.05), the feed conversion ratio (FCR) showed significant improvements with garlic supplementation. The FCR values for the GARL0, GARL1, GARL2, and GARL3 groups were 3.32, 3.22, 3.10, and 2.91, respectively (P<0.05).

These findings are consistent with previous studies that reported improvements in ADG and FCR in chickens supplemented with garlic (Oleforuh-Okoleh et al., 2014; Nguyen, 2020; Brzosska et al., 2015; Fadlalla et al., 2010; Abdullah et al., 2010). Similar results were also observed by Bui et al. (2015), who found no significant differences in FCR when chickens were supplemented with garlic at levels of 1%, 2%, and 3%. The enhanced weight gain and metabolic efficiency observed in garlic-supplemented treatments underscore garlic’s potential as a natural growth promoter that can effectively replace traditional veterinary drugs, including antibiotics, vitamins, and digestive enzymes, in poultry production (Tollba et al., 2003).

Herbal supplements, including garlic, are known for their multifunctional roles in animal nutrition. As Steiner (2010) notes, herbs can promote growth, enhance productivity, act as antioxidants to mitigate stress, and support immune function by inhibiting pathogenic microorganisms. Additionally, most herbs used in animal feed stimulate the olfactory and taste senses, boosting appetite and food intake. This stimulation, coupled with increased endogenous enzyme secretion, improves digestion and nutrient absorption, leading to better feed conversion efficiency and faster, healthier growth (Valenzuela-Grijalva et al., 2017; Krauze, 2021).

Carcasses Traits

The effects of fresh garlic supplementation on carcass characteristics are detailed in Table 3. The analysis revealed no significant differences in the ratios of carcass, thigh, breast, and abdominal fat among the treatment groups (P>0.05).

Similarly, there were no significant variations in the chemical composition of the meat across the groups (P>0.05) (Table 4). These findings are in agreement with those of Kim et al. (2008), who reported no significant differences in dry matter and ash content in chicken meat samples supplemented with garlic (P>0.05). In this study, meat quality parameters were not influenced by the experimental diets.

Correlation analysis indicated no significant relationship between garlic supplementation and the OM/DM parameter. However, a slight positive correlation was observed with pH0, drip loss, and dry matter, while a slight negative correlation was found with pH24, cooking loss, CP/DM, and EE/DM. Additionally, pH24 showed a positive correlation with both cooking loss percentage and OM/DM, while no correlation was observed between pH24 and dry matter or CP/DM (Figure 2).

 

Table 3: Effects of levels of dietary fresh garlic supplementation on carcass yield (g) and carcass percentage (%) Minhdu chicken.

Parameter	GARL0	GARL1	GARL2	GARL3	SEM	P
Live weight	1,900	1,967	2,017	2,083	0.03	0.014
Carcass, g	1,217c	1,283bc	1.342ab	1,408a	0.02	0.006
Thigh meat, g	317.0b	360.7ab	329.3a	364.7a	9.18	0.015
Breast meat, g	264.7c	280.3bc	301.3ab	327.3a	7.90	0.003
Abdominal fat, g	26.2	22.17	15.50	25.33	4.89	0.449
Relative to live weight, %
Carcass	63.76	65.09	66.33	67.37	1.01	0.165
Thigh meat	26.16	27.98	24.66	26.19	0.83	0.140
Breast meat	21.74	21.99	22.48	23.26	0.74	0.523
Abdominal fat	2.09	1.82	1.20	1.92	0.38	0.433

 

Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).

 

Table 4: Effects of levels of dietary fresh garlic supplementation on pH value, drip loss, cooking loss and chemical of breast meat Minhdu chicken.

Parameter	GARL0	GARL1	GARL2	GARL3	SEM	P
pH0	6,33	6,38	6,30	6,56	0,08	0,171
pH24	5,92	5,93	5,86	5,83	0,08	0,753
Drip loss, %	2,75	2,78	2,88	2,80	0,77	0,671
Cooking loss, %	17,85	17,05	16,98	17,78	0,78	0,785
DM, %	30.10	29.53	29.89	30.55	0.41	0.422
%/DM
OM	93.74	94.61	92.91	94.17	0.52	0.220
CP	88.34	90.38	86.39	89.49	1.16	0.190
EE	6.16	6.62	6.63	5.45	0.52	0.400

 

These results are consistent with those of Nguyen and Nguyen (2020), who found no significant differences in carcass yield, thigh meat, breast meat, or abdominal fat between garlic-supplemented and control groups. Furthermore, factors such as breed, garlic source, harvest time, and climate may influence the nutritional effectiveness of garlic in poultry feed (Safa et al., 2012). Drip loss and cooking loss were also unaffected by the level of fresh garlic supplementation, aligning with previous studies on various chicken breeds, which reported similar values for these parameters (Mehaffey et al., 2006; Jaturasitha et al., 2008; Tran et al., 2020). Overall, garlic supplementation did not significantly alter the meat quality, particularly in terms of dry matter and ash content (P>0.05) (Kim et al., 2008).

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In conclusion, a dietary addition of fresh garlic up to 3.0% has a beneficial effect on growth performance of Minh Du chickens affecting the average daily gain and the feed conversion ratio. This same supplementation in the diet led to a significant increase in the weight of breast and thigh of carcass in Minh Du chicken.

 

Further Research Directions

Environmental sustainability assessment of garlic supplementation in Minh Du chicken feed through of chicken waste

Evaluate the effectiveness of alternative herbal supplements compared to garlic for improving growth performance and feed conversion in Minh Du chickens.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to the An Giang University for the possibility to execute the field and laboratory experiments.

NOVELTY STATEMENT

At 3% fresh garlic is best for Minh Du chicken.

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS

Trang Nguyen Thi Ngoc: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing- Original draft.

Hong Nguyen Thi Thu: Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing.

All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

We certify that there is no conflict of interest

REFERENCES

Abdullah AY, Mahmoud KZ, Nusairat BM, Qudsieh RI (2010). Small intestinal histology, production parameters, and meat quality as influenced by dietary supplementation of garlic (Allium sativum) in broiler chicks. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 9: 414-419. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2010.e80

Amagase H (2006). Clarifying the real bioactive constituents of garlic. J. Nutr., 136: 716S-725S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.3.716S

AOAC (2005). Official methods of analysis of AOAC international-18th edition. Horwitz, W. (Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington DC, USA.

Birhanu MY, Geremew K, Esatu W, Worku S, Getachew F, Nguyen VD, Ngo TKC, Unger F, Dessie T (2021). Poultry production, marketing and consumption in Vietnam: A review of literature. ILRI Research Report 80. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.

Brzosska F, Śliwiński B, Michalik-Rutkowska O, Śliwa J (2015). The effect of garlic (Allium sativum L.) on growth performance, mortality rate, meat and blood parameters in broilers, Ann. Ani. Sci., 15(4): 961-75. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2015-0052

Bui TLM, Vo ND, Ho TBT (2015). Survey on the antibacterial effect of garlic (Allium sativum L.) on Escherichia coli and the influence of garlic on chicken growth, 40: -6.

Demir E, Kiline K, Yildirim Y (2005). Use of antibiotic growth promoter and two herbal natural feed additives with and without exogenous enzymes in wheat base broiler diets. S. Afr. Anim. Sci., 35: 61-72

Fadlalla IMT, Mohammed BH, Bakhiet AO (2010). Effect of Feeding Garlic on the Performance and Immunity of Broilers. Asian J. Poult. Sci., 4: 182-189. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2010.182.189

Jamel M, Saeid Arkan B, Mohamed Maad A AL-Baddy (2013). Effect of adding Garlic Powder (Allium sativum) and Black Seed (Nigella sativa) in Feed on Broiler Growth Performance and Intestinal Wall Structure. J. Nat. Sci. Res., http://www.iiste.org. 2224-3186 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0921

Jaturasitha S, Kayan A, Wicke M (2008). Carcass and meat characteristics of male chickens between Thai indigenous compared with improved layer breeds and their crossbred. Arch. Tierz., 51 (3): 283-294. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-51-283-2008

Kim YJ, Jin SK, Yang HS (2008). Effect of dietary garlic bulb and husk on the physicochemical properties of chicken meat. Poult. Sci., 88: 398-405. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00179

Krauze M (2021). Phytobiotics, a natural growth promoter for poultry. In: Feed Additives in Animal Nutrition. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99030

Lawal RA, Hanotte O (2021). Domestic chicken diversity: Origin, distribution, and adaptation. Anim. Genet., 52(4): 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.13091

McDonald, P., Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J.F.D., Morgan, C.A., Sinclair, L.A., Wikinson, R.G. (2011). Animal nutrition - 7th edition. Trans-Atlantic Publications, Incorporated.

Mehaffey JM, Pradhan SP, Meullenet JF, Emmert JL, McKee SR, Owens CM (2006). Meat Quality Evaluation of Minimally Aged Broiler Breast Fillets from Five Commercial Genetic Strains. Poult. Sci. 85: 902-908. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.5.902

Minitab (2010).  Minitab Reference Manual, Release 16.1 for Windows. Minitab Inc., USA.

Mund MD, Khan UH, Tahir U, Mustafa BE, Fayyaz A (2017). Antimicrobial drug residues in poultry products and implications on public health: A review. Int. J. Food Prop., 20: 1433-1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2016.1212874

Nguyen TT (2020). Effect of powder or extract juice garlic on growth performance of growing Noi chickens. J. Anim. Husbandry Sci. Tech., 261: 28-33

Nguyen TMN, Nguyen VV (2020). Influence of supplementing garlic (Allium Sativum) on growth performance of Noi chicken from 4 to 13 week-age. J. Anim. Sci. technol.,112: 35-43

Oleforuh-Okoleh VU, Chukwu GC, Adeolu AI (2014). Effect of ground ginger and garlic on the growth performance, carcass quality and economics of production of broiler chickens, G.J.B.B., 3(3): 225-29.

R Core Team (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Rahman MRT, Fliss I, Biron E (2022). Insights in the development and uses of alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry and swine production. Antibiotics, 11: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060766

Safa MA. Tazi E, Zolikha MA, Mohamed KA, Mukhtar AM (2012). Response of Broiler Chicks to Diets Supplemented with Garlic Essential Oil as Natural Growth Promoter. Int. J. Sci. Res., ISSN: 2319-7064.

Sapsuha Y, Suprijatna E, Kismiati S, Sugiharto S, (2021). Combination of probiotic and phythobiotic as an alternative for antibiotic growth promoter for broilers chickens-a review. Livestock Res. Rural Dev., 33(4): from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd33/4/3349yus_ar.html.

Sopian Y, Wattanachant C, Wattanasit S (2020). Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality of Betong Chicken Fed with Diets Supplemented with Crude Glycerin. J. Poult. Sci., 57(4): 291-296. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0190071

Steiner T (2010). Phytogenics in animal nutrition natural concepts to optimize gut health and performance. United Kingdom: Nottingham University Press. https://doi.org/10.7313/UPO9781904761747

Taiyun W, Simko V (2021). R package ‘corrplot’:  Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.92). Available from https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot 

Tollba AHH, Hassan MSH (2003). Using some natural additive to improve physiological and productive performance of broiler chicks under high temperature conditions. Black cumin (Nigella sativa) or garlic (Allium sativum). Poult. Sci., 23: 327-340.

Tran DH, Pham TQ, Nguyen VL, Nguyen TKL (2020). Effects of Lactozym supplementation on growth perfomance, productivity and quality of meat in chickens, J. Anim. Sci. Technol.,110: 41-54.

Valenzuela-Grijalva NV, Pinelli-Saavedra A, Muhlia-Almazan A, Domínguez-Díaz D, González-Ríos H (2017). Dietary inclusion effects of phytochemicals as growth promoters in animal production. J. Anim. Sci. Technol., 59: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-017-0133-9