Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN
Latest Blogs: https://researcherslinks.com/en/kahoot-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/blooket-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/comcast-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/gimkit-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/deltamath/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/wgu-student-portal/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/ncedcloud/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/rsm-student-portal/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/streameast/

Effects of Energy Feed Combinations and Non-Protein Nitrogen on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility and Nitrogen Retention of Saanen Crossbred Goats

Effects of Energy Feed Combinations and Non-Protein Nitrogen on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility and Nitrogen Retention of Saanen Crossbred Goats

Nguyen Thi Hanh Chi1,2, Ho Xuan Nghiep1,2, Tran Trung Tuan1,2, Nguyen Binh Truong1,2*

1An Giang University, An Giang, Vietnam. No 18, Ung Van Khiem Street, Dong Xuyen ward, Long Xuyen city, An Giang province, Vietnam; 2Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

 
*Correspondence | Nguyen Binh Truong, An Giang University, An Giang, Vietnam. No 18, Ung Van Khiem Street, Dong Xuyen ward, Long Xuyen city, An Giang province; Email: nbtruong@agu.edu.vn

ABSTRACT

The study aimed to determine the effects of feed supplement combinations with or without urea on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and nitrogen retention of goats. The study was conducted in the experimental farm of An Giang University, which is part of Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, from February to May 2024. Four male Saanen crossbred goats aged five months (15.4±3.32 kg) were studied using a Latin Square design (4 × 4) over 21 days/periods. The four treatments were maise and cassava chips (Ma.C); broken rice and cassava chips (BrR.C); cassava chips, and urea (Ma.C.U); broken rice, cassava chips, and urea (BrR.C.U). The basal diet was premix, tofu waste, Operculina turpethum vines, and ad libitum fresh elephant grass. The dry matter consumption per body weight showed a tendency towards a decrease in Ma.C.U (3.11%) and Ma.C treatments (3.11%) than in BrR.C.U (3.31%) and BrR.C (3.25%) treatments. Crude protein digestibility (%) of BrR.C.U was similar to Ma.C.U (P>0.05), but it was higher than (P<0.05) BrR.C and Ma.C (78.0, 78.7, 67.4 and 68.2, respectively). Across treatments, nitrogen retention (g/animal/day) differed (P<0.05). Treatments were 4.18, 7.12, 5.08, and 7.50 g for Ma.C, Ma.C.U, BrR.C, and BrR.C.U. Therefore, the energy feed combination without urea or urea that feed intake, nutrient value and nitrogen retention well from high to low were BrR.C.U, Ma.C.U, BrR.C and Ma.C treatments.
 
Keywords | Soluble carbohydrates, Combinations, Energy feed, Non-protein nitrogen, Small ruminant, Goat

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

October

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56, Iss. 5, pp. 2001-2500

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe