Effect of Meteorological Factors on the Concentration of Allergenic Pollen Grains in the Atmosphere of Capital Territory Islamabad, Pakistan
Research Article
Effect of Meteorological Factors on the Concentration of Allergenic Pollen Grains in the Atmosphere of Capital Territory Islamabad, Pakistan
Farooq Jan1*, Abdur Rauf1, Ikramullah Khan1, Muhammad Yasin2, Muhammad Qayash3, Hazrat Wali1, Muhammad Luqman1, Fayaz Asad4 and Muhammad Khalid5
1Department of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, 23200, Pakistan; 2Gomal Centre of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Gomal University, DI Khan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; 3Department of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan; 4Department of Botany, Bacha Khan University Charsadda, Pakistan; 5School of Agriculture and Biology Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Abstract | The present study is aimed to find meteorological factors affecting pollen concentration in Islamabad. For this purpose, three years data (2009-2011) of pollen concentration and meteorological parameters have been used. Pollen concentration in the atmosphere has been measured using RotoRod sampler. Many plants pollen are allergenic that cause different types of allergenic diseases globally. Pakistan also faces the problem of pollen allergy caused by various plants pollen. Among these allergenic pollen producing plants are Broussonetia papyrifera, Alternanthera pungens, Cannabis sativa, Eucalyptus globulus and Taraxacum officinales pollen grains are dominant. These plants pollen cause different allergies like asthma, rhinitis and hay fever etc. Extremely high pollen concentration in the spring and summer seasons in month of March, April, August and relatively less concentration in winter and autumn season in the month of October, December, January are recorded. These high concentrations are mainly due to Broussonetia papyrifera tree. Meteorological parameters affect pollen concentration in the atmosphere by two ways its production and dispersion. Different meteorological parameters like seasons, mean temperature, rain fall, and wind speed are correlated with total pollen count (TPC) using SPSS 16.0 and MS Excel to draw a relationship between them which are useful for allergy patients. The results showed that mean temperature, wind speed and rainfall are the factors that influence pollen of Broussonetia papyrifera only during the spring seasons and the Dandelion, Cannabis sativa and Eucalyptus globulus pollen grains are influence throughout the year. As a result, the total pollen counts in the atmosphere increased due to Broussonetia papyrifera throughout the year.
Received | March 01, 2023; Accepted | June 06, 2023; Published | June 27, 2023
*Correspondence | Farooq Jan, Department of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, 23200, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Jan, F., A. Rauf, I. Khan, M. Yasin, M. Qayash, H. Wali, M. Luqman, F. Asad and M. Khalid. 2023. Effect of meteorological factors on the concentration of allergenic pollen grains in the atmosphere of capital territory, Islamabad, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 29(2): 122-137.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.PJWSR/2023/29.2.122.137
Keywords | Pollen count, Metrological parameter, Pollen allergy, Statistical tests, Islamabad, Pakistan
Copyright: 2023 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Allergy is abnormal reaction of the body caused by hypersensitivity of the immune system to ordinary harmless substances present in the environment called allergens that frequently causes little or no trouble in most people (McConnell, 2007). For the previous four-decade reports reveal that prevalence of allergenic asthma and other allergic diseases increased greatly. In different western countries the incidence of asthma in children is higher and it is expected that the increase may be due to high pollen grains in these countries (Hertzen et al., 2005). According to the previous study allergy problems are more common in the populated and industrialized cities as compared to less populated and industrialized societies (Braback et al., 2004). An allergy problem increases in those peoples living in cities (Hertzen et al., 2005). The variations and incidence of allergy in different parts of the world suggest that environmental factors play an important role in such disorders (Eder et al., 2006).
Air pollution and climatic change in environment increase allergenic diseases (Beggs et al., 2004). The environmental substances that are linked to allergic diseases are house dust, spores, aeroallergens, pollution and climate (Eder et al., 2006). These allergens may originate from natural environment or from chemically contaminated environment. Plants pollen play important role in prevalence of respiratory allergic diseases among these allergies, seasonal allergic diseases are increase due to change quality, quantity and distribution of pollen allergens and the duration of peak pollen time (Beggs et al., 2004; Zafar et al., 2006). Among these allergens pollen grains of grasses and trees are the important allergens that are responsible for allergic diseases. Pollination processes of trees, weeds and grass species in many regions of the world release allergenic pollen grains, these pollen grains are the most important source of allergy (Anderson and Lidhlom, 2003). The major part of air flora of a region mostly contains pollen grains of wind pollinated plants (Riaz et al., 2021). Wind-pollinated flowering plants are significant in allergic diseases then insect-pollinated flowering plants. Wind-pollinated plants pollen is small, smooth and produced in large quantity (Gu, 1993). The sizes of this inhalant pollen are small and microscopic that can easily entered through lower respiratory tract (Perveen et al., 2015).
The study of airborne pollen grains provides a continuous monitoring of the pollen on the basis of climate change in environment. High concentration of pollen in the atmosphere directly affects the human health (Haroon et al., 2008).
Plants pollen allergy was first described by English physician Charles Harrison Blackly in 1873 in his book experimental researches on causes and nature of catarrhus aestivus. Now this is recognized that pollen contain a number of chemicals such as proteins and glycoprotein’s, which cause allergenic reactions in sensitive peoples resulting in symptoms of atopic diseases. Aerobiological study has recognized that which pollen grains cause hypersensitivity reaction and how total pollen count varies throughout the year (Dopazo et al., 2000). The increase in number of pollen grains concentration in environment can influence the intensity and prevalence of allergic problems in sensitive people (Smart et al., 1979). Some recent studies have found that the increase in airborne pollen may be due to climatic and environmental change especially impact the amount and season of pollen, as well as the distribution of plant and pollen (Oh et al., 2012). Airborne pollen study also provides Information about allergenic pollen and their relation to allergenic problem which are important for pollen sensitive individual (Zeb et al., 2017). Respiratory allergy diseases belong to seasonal pollen allergy (Ribeiro et al., 2009). Airborne pollen concentration in environment play significant role in social issues like pollinosis (Mandal et al., 2008). The pollens of plants species are considered the most efficient inhalants for causing asthma, rhinitis and hay fever (Liu et al., 2010; Bousquet et al., 2008). The prevalence rate 7.3% of allergenic rhinitis and asthma and these problems were mainly caused by pollen grains, spores and dust allergens in the air (Al-Hammadi et al., 2010). The allergic patient have irregular episode of asthma attacks, breathlessness, chest pain and wheezing (Pokharel et al., 2007). The recent aerobiological studies established huge awareness among the peoples due to their application in allergology (Sahney et al., 2008). Local vegetation of region can be represented by pollen grains present in the air mixture (Chaturvedi and Datta, 1995).
In desert and semi-desert areas of the world such as united states of America, Europe, Africa, Iran, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia Amaranthaceae family pollen grains has been documented as a allergenic pollen that cause severe allergic problem (Tehrani et al., 2010). In America about 35 million peoples are suffering from the upper respiratory tract infection that show allergenic symptom to aeroallergens. Most of the pollen allergy commonly known as hay fever is most common in United States. Aeroallergens also cause allergenic asthma and about 11 million in America are affecting from this allergy (U.S. Department, 2003).
Pollen allergy have significant effect all over Europe, evidence show that prevalence of respiratory allergic diseases like asthma, rhino conjunctivitis and eczema are induced by pollen (Asher et al., 2006). In UK Children asthmatic symptoms are maximum and twice in European average. Allergic rhinitis symptoms in UK children are more during pollen peak time (Walker et al., 2007). Study of allergenic pollen in UAE exposed that 7.3% of asthma and allergic rhinitis are mainly caused by pollen (Al-Hammadi et al., 2010). Pollen allergy has significant effect on Iran. Pollen is the most common allergen sensitization in Iran and estimated about (47.0%) of all allergen (Moghtaderi et al., 2017). In China airborne pollen produce different health problem like allergic diseases such as asthma, rhinitis, and hay fever. Study shows that there are about 10000000 patients with pollinosis in China (Liu et al., 2010).
Different techniques are used to solve the problem allergy such as skin prick test and blood test. Skin testing can confirm many common types of allergies. In some cases, skin prick tests can be the most accurate and least expensive way to confirm allergens. For skin prick testing, involves the places a drop of mixture of 25 pollen antigens under the fore arm using sterile needle. They will then lightly prick or scratch on skin. If patient are sensitive to pollen antigens, they will develop redness, swelling and itching at the test site within 15 minutes (Qazilbash et al., 1997). The prevalence respiratory allergic diseases and airborne pollen are greatly affected from climatic changes.
Climatic factors such as rainfall, humidity, temperature and wind affect concentration of pollen grains in the air. Between the temperature and pollen concentration has positive correlation and negative correlation of pollen was present with humidity and rainfall (Alwadie, 2008). The influence of temperature on airborne pollen on woody species has been widely studied, that temperature effect pollen especially in flowering tree during spring seasons (Menzel et al., 2006). During rainy season observed minor pollen grains concentration because rain water sweeps typically airborne pollen from air (Hong et al., 1986). Climatic factors also affect pollen grains dispersal mechanism (Burge, 2002; Jato et al., 2002). Pollen dispersal also depend on chemical properties such as (available water content, type of carbohydrate and proteins in pollen) and physical properties such as (pollen morphology, pollination time, its size and weight) during pollen release (Pacini et al., 2004). In hot, dry and windy days high pollen grains was seen in the air. Trees pollen usually dominates in spring season and an herbaceous plant pollen is dominates in autumn (Chaturvedi and Datta, 1995). The pollen shows positive correlation with average temperature (Alwadie, 2008).
Islamabad is the capital of Pakistan in which pollen allergy is one of the most emerging health problems. Plants species such as Broussonetia papyrifera, Alternanthera pungens, Cannabis sativa, Eucalyptus globulus, Grasses and Pinus species of the area producing pollen that responsible for pollen allergy (Ozturk et al., 2013). In Pakistan particularly in two cities Rawalpindi and Islamabad in last few years face a problem of respiratory allergic diseases like asthma due to allergens in atmosphere that initiate allergic responses in susceptible individuals. Pollens, fungal spores, castor bean, house dust mite are the aeroallergens they produce allergic response in the body. About 90% of childhood and 17-80% of adult asthmatics are allergic to aeroallergens (Hussain et al., 2013). The most common aeroallergens symptom reported by medical sources is asthma, watery red and itchy eyes, running, itchy or blocked nose, sneezing, itchy ears, as well as, itching of the skin on any area of the body leading to redness. According to Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) 360 persons suffering from allergy symptoms (Bano et al., 1996). The invasive plant species produce new health problems like respiratory diseases such as asthma and rhinitis in development countries like Pakistan (Hussain et al., 2013).
Preliminary study of atmospheric pollen in Islamabad has been carried out by Haroon et al. (2008), similarly Ghufran et al. (2013) conducted studied on airborne pollen grains of paper mulberry under changing climatic condition in Islamabad in relation to allergy. No data was available on airborne pollen grains in Islamabad for the period of December 2008 to October 2011 in relation to environmental conditions. The present study from (2009-2011) exposed the relationship between the daily pollen count of seven different species with different meteorological perimeters such as (average temperature, rain, wind speed etc.) and its distribution in the air mixture during the study period and reviewing the status of pollen grains caused allergies in Pakistan.
Table 1: Different plants species pollen count of 2009 and average climatic conditions (average temperature, wind speed and rain fall).
Date/month |
Paper mulberry |
Can-nabis |
Dandelion |
Alter-nanthera |
Eucalyptus |
Total pollen count (TPC) |
Averge temp (°C) |
Wind speed meter per second (m/s) |
Rain fall in millimeters (mm) |
13-17 Dec 08 |
6 |
10 |
5 |
6 |
173 |
205 |
13.0 |
2 |
0.6 |
18-22 Dec 08 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
95 |
118 |
13.5 |
3.2 |
16 |
23-27 Dec 08 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1 |
93 |
115 |
13.0 |
0 |
0 |
28-31 Dec 08 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
87 |
110 |
12.0 |
2 |
0 |
01-05 Jun 09 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
97 |
112 |
10.8 |
4.8 |
3.4 |
06-10 Jun 09 |
5 |
11 |
7 |
0 |
73 |
98 |
10.7 |
2 |
0 |
11-15 Jun 09 |
5 |
30 |
7 |
2 |
83 |
128 |
11.8 |
2.4 |
0 |
16-20 Jun 09 |
4 |
28 |
4 |
2 |
74 |
113 |
12.7 |
8.2 |
7.7 |
21-25 Jun 09 |
6 |
92 |
9 |
2 |
65 |
174 |
13.9 |
3.2 |
0.5 |
26-31 Jun 09 |
7 |
175 |
14 |
0 |
110 |
310 |
12.7 |
1.8 |
3.2 |
6-10 Mar 09 |
16596 |
176 |
79 |
1 |
50 |
16904 |
17.6 |
9.4 |
0 |
11-15 Mar 09 |
93187 |
102 |
53 |
10 |
38 |
93395 |
18.6 |
5.4 |
0 |
16-20 Mar 09 |
162230 |
31 |
37 |
6 |
34 |
162344 |
19.6 |
5 |
0 |
21-25 Mar 09 |
65432 |
33 |
54 |
4 |
55 |
65583 |
16.7 |
8.8 |
9.8 |
26-31 Mar 09 |
43103 |
29 |
103 |
11 |
105 |
43368 |
16.9 |
4 |
4.1 |
1-5 April 09 |
10948 |
40 |
58 |
2 |
155 |
11213 |
20.4 |
12 |
3.7 |
6-10 April 09 |
2059 |
16 |
30 |
2 |
189 |
2311 |
17.7 |
15.2 |
17.1 |
11-15 April 09 |
6270 |
27 |
38 |
9 |
336 |
6692 |
22.2 |
11.4 |
0 |
16-20 April 09 |
15291 |
25 |
44 |
13 |
361 |
15753 |
22.5 |
8.8 |
2.52 |
21-23 April 09 |
5703 |
20 |
29 |
2 |
96 |
5857 |
21.7 |
12.2 |
2.4 |
13-17 Jul 09 |
26 |
16 |
209 |
6 |
173 |
432 |
32.1 |
8 |
0 |
18-22 Jul 09 |
10 |
6 |
69 |
7 |
220 |
313 |
31.8 |
16.8 |
2.95 |
23-27 Jul 09 |
78 |
14 |
300 |
8 |
225 |
658 |
30.5 |
11.2 |
3.4 |
28-31 Jul 09 |
76 |
11 |
208 |
8 |
204 |
498 |
29.3 |
13.8 |
1.4 |
01-05 Aug 09 |
1466 |
32 |
289 |
9 |
213 |
2009 |
31.5 |
5.6 |
3.55 |
06-10 Aug 09 |
4632 |
132 |
193 |
16 |
157 |
5131 |
30.5 |
16.8 |
13.8 |
11-15 Aug 09 |
14553 |
19 |
520 |
7 |
186 |
15285 |
31.6 |
5.6 |
1.12 |
16-20 Aug 09 |
1204 |
18 |
648 |
9 |
156 |
2036 |
27.0 |
15.6 |
9.5 |
21-25 Aug 09 |
1678 |
24 |
1191 |
24 |
368 |
3285 |
28.1 |
4.4 |
0.05 |
26-31 Aug 09 |
436 |
27 |
1495 |
42 |
297 |
2297 |
28.3 |
10 |
0.95 |
01-05 Sep 09 |
139 |
26 |
831 |
19 |
187 |
1202 |
26.0 |
4.4 |
7.3 |
06-10 Sep 09 |
79 |
21 |
922 |
16 |
206 |
1245 |
26.8 |
4 |
1.2 |
11-15 Sep 09 |
64 |
16 |
741 |
6 |
190 |
1017 |
28.4 |
5.2 |
0 |
16-20 Sep09 |
49 |
76 |
629 |
19 |
216 |
989 |
26.4 |
11.4 |
3.96 |
21-25 Sep 09 |
32 |
50 |
599 |
17 |
226 |
924 |
28.5 |
3.2 |
0.2 |
26-30 Sep 09 |
41 |
35 |
471 |
13 |
191 |
751 |
28.6 |
5.2 |
0 |
01-05 Oct 09 |
49 |
19 |
281 |
10 |
139 |
498 |
26.9 |
6.4 |
1.8 |
06-10 Oct 09 |
69 |
19 |
199 |
6 |
159 |
452 |
24.6 |
4.8 |
0 |
11-15 Oct 09 |
53 |
12 |
162 |
6 |
120 |
353 |
23.3 |
3.6 |
0 |
16-20 Oct 09 |
38 |
13 |
92 |
5 |
77 |
225 |
21.5 |
6.8 |
0 |
The pollen taxa recovered from rotorode sampler placed on metrology deportment Islamabad.
Table 2: Pollen count of different plant species 2010 and average climatic conditions (average temperature, wind speed and rain fall).
Date/month |
Paper mulberruy |
Can-nabi |
Dande-lion |
Alter-nanthera |
Eucalyptus |
Total pollen count (TPC) |
Total pollen count (TPC) |
Averge temp (°C) |
Avg Rain fall in millimeters (mm) |
13-17 Dec 09 |
8 |
0 |
12 |
6 |
69 |
95 |
12.5 |
0.8 |
0 |
18-22 Dec 09 |
6 |
4 |
18 |
2 |
43 |
73 |
11.4 |
3.2 |
0 |
23-27 Dec 09 |
8 |
2 |
20 |
6 |
30 |
66 |
10.9 |
3.2 |
0 |
28-31 Dec 09 |
6 |
1 |
16 |
7 |
26 |
56 |
9.7 |
2.4 |
0 |
01-05 Jun 10 |
6 |
0 |
12 |
6 |
46 |
70 |
10.7 |
4 |
0 |
06-10 Jun 10 |
6 |
1 |
11 |
4 |
44 |
67 |
11.6 |
4.6 |
0 |
11-15 Jun 10 |
7 |
1 |
14 |
5 |
55 |
82 |
10.5 |
2.8 |
0 |
16-20 Jun 10 |
7 |
1 |
13 |
5 |
42 |
68 |
12.3 |
0.8 |
0 |
21-25 Jun 10 |
7 |
5 |
14 |
6 |
52 |
84 |
13.6 |
3.2 |
0 |
26-31 Jun 10 |
9 |
21 |
30 |
1 |
68 |
129 |
14.1 |
11.4 |
4.3 |
6-10 Mar 10 |
9406 |
101 |
105 |
2 |
77 |
9696 |
17.2 |
8 |
0.7 |
11-15 Mar 10 |
115316 |
28 |
67 |
3 |
63 |
115486 |
19.4 |
5 |
0 |
16-20 Mar 10 |
172243 |
44 |
70 |
1 |
84 |
172452 |
22.8 |
4 |
0 |
21-25 Mar 10 |
98375 |
24 |
48 |
0 |
74 |
98530 |
24.9 |
3 |
0 |
26-31 Mar 10 |
12238 |
149 |
106 |
0 |
104 |
12603 |
23.2 |
10 |
4 |
1-5 April 10 |
4368 |
35 |
27 |
0 |
84 |
5419 |
22.1 |
20.0 |
0.3 |
6-10 April 10 |
4454 |
28 |
37 |
0 |
73 |
4595 |
24.4 |
5.6 |
0 |
11-15 April 10 |
2646 |
43 |
27 |
0 |
68 |
2788 |
26.0 |
6.4 |
0 |
16-20 April 10 |
1109 |
27 |
37 |
0 |
63 |
1237 |
29.1 |
10.4 |
1.0 |
21-23 April 10 |
185 |
7 |
14 |
0 |
206 |
418 |
22.5 |
8.4 |
1.3 |
13-17 Jul 2010 |
114 |
12 |
163 |
5 |
157 |
451 |
31.5 |
4 |
0 |
18-22 Jul 2010 |
67 |
10 |
92 |
12 |
162 |
343 |
29.6 |
6.2 |
20.6 |
23-27 Jul 2010 |
816 |
11 |
107 |
6 |
201 |
1141 |
29.7 |
4 |
1.2 |
28-31 Jul 2010 |
1640 |
6 |
59 |
4 |
83 |
1792 |
25.8 |
6 |
68.66 |
01-05 Aug 10 |
10772 |
30 |
94 |
5 |
194 |
11096 |
30.0 |
2 |
2.9 |
06-10 Aug 10 |
836 |
31 |
100 |
4 |
134 |
1105 |
27.7 |
2 |
8.9 |
11-15 Aug 10 |
362 |
18 |
273 |
5 |
172 |
830 |
29.5 |
5.2 |
3.25 |
16-20 Aug 10 |
213 |
13 |
198 |
11 |
161 |
596 |
29.4 |
4.4 |
15.24 |
21-25 Aug 10 |
62 |
12 |
152 |
5 |
125 |
356 |
28.1 |
6.8 |
14.78 |
26-31 Aug 10 |
246 |
19 |
312 |
7 |
123 |
707 |
12.3 |
2.4 |
0.2 |
01-05 Sep 10 |
113 |
13 |
217 |
4 |
158 |
505 |
29.5 |
12.2 |
14.7 |
06-10 Sep 10 |
59 |
53 |
206 |
10 |
192 |
520 |
28.5 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
11-15 Sep 10 |
77 |
44 |
259 |
10 |
156 |
546 |
26.6 |
4.4 |
5.6 |
16-20 Sep 10 |
89 |
42 |
214 |
14 |
146 |
505 |
24.84 |
7.4 |
4.9 |
21-25 Sep 10 |
65 |
47 |
191 |
5 |
147 |
455 |
26.1 |
3.6 |
4.9 |
26-30 Sep 10 |
74 |
22 |
143 |
4 |
140 |
383 |
24.87 |
2.4 |
0 |
01-05 Oct 10 |
49 |
47 |
218 |
14 |
94 |
422 |
24.8 |
1.6 |
0 |
06-10 Oct 10 |
54 |
34 |
249 |
0 |
108 |
445 |
25.5 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
11-15 Oct 10 |
38 |
18 |
151 |
2 |
113 |
323 |
24.4 |
9.2 |
1.4 |
16-20 Oct 10 |
27 |
11 |
91 |
0 |
117 |
248 |
24.8 |
1.3 |
0 |
Materials and Methods
Study area
Islamabad is the capital of Pakistan. Its location on the world map at 33° 42’ N and 73º 10’ E. The temperature of Islamabad varies from an average daily low of 2 °C in January to an average daily high of 40 °C in June. Half of the annual rainfall occurs in July and August, averaging about 255 mm in each of these two months. The remainder of the year has significantly less rain, amounting to about 50 mm per month. Hailstorms are common in the spring.
Table 3: Pollen count of different plant species 2011 and average climatic conditions (average temperature, wind speed and rain fall).
Date/month |
Paper mulberruy |
Can-nabis |
Dande-lion |
Alternan-thera |
Eucalyptus |
Total pollen count (TPC) |
Averge temp (°C) |
Wind speed (m/s) |
Avg. rain fall (mm) |
13-17 Dec 09 |
8 |
0 |
12 |
6 |
69 |
95 |
12.5 |
0.8 |
0 |
18-22 Dec 09 |
6 |
4 |
18 |
2 |
43 |
73 |
11.4 |
3.2 |
0 |
23-27 Dec 09 |
8 |
2 |
20 |
6 |
30 |
66 |
10.9 |
3.2 |
0 |
28-31 Dec 09 |
6 |
1 |
16 |
7 |
26 |
56 |
9.7 |
2.4 |
0 |
01-05 Jun 10 |
6 |
0 |
12 |
6 |
46 |
70 |
10.7 |
4 |
0 |
06-10 Jun 10 |
6 |
1 |
11 |
4 |
44 |
67 |
11.6 |
4.6 |
0 |
11-15 Jun 10 |
7 |
1 |
14 |
5 |
55 |
82 |
10.5 |
2.8 |
0 |
16-20 Jun 10 |
7 |
1 |
13 |
5 |
42 |
68 |
12.3 |
0.8 |
0 |
21-25 Jun 10 |
7 |
5 |
14 |
6 |
52 |
84 |
13.6 |
3.2 |
0 |
26-31 Jun 10 |
9 |
21 |
30 |
1 |
68 |
129 |
14.1 |
11.4 |
4.3 |
6-10 Mar 10 |
9406 |
101 |
105 |
2 |
77 |
9696 |
17.2 |
8 |
0.7 |
11-15 Mar 10 |
115316 |
28 |
67 |
3 |
63 |
115486 |
19.4 |
5 |
0 |
16-20 Mar 10 |
172243 |
44 |
70 |
1 |
84 |
172452 |
22.8 |
4 |
0 |
21-25 Mar 10 |
98375 |
24 |
48 |
0 |
74 |
98530 |
24.9 |
3 |
0 |
26-31 Mar 10 |
12238 |
149 |
106 |
0 |
104 |
12603 |
23.2 |
10 |
4 |
1-5 April 10 |
4368 |
35 |
27 |
0 |
84 |
5419 |
22.1 |
20.0 |
0.3 |
6-10 April 10 |
4454 |
28 |
37 |
0 |
73 |
4595 |
24.4 |
5.6 |
0 |
11-15 April 10 |
2646 |
43 |
27 |
0 |
68 |
2788 |
26.0 |
6.4 |
0 |
16-20 April 10 |
1109 |
27 |
37 |
0 |
63 |
1237 |
29.1 |
10.4 |
1.0 |
21-23 April 10 |
185 |
7 |
14 |
0 |
206 |
418 |
22.5 |
8.4 |
1.3 |
13-17 Jul 2010 |
114 |
12 |
163 |
5 |
157 |
451 |
31.5 |
4 |
0 |
18-22 Jul 2010 |
67 |
10 |
92 |
12 |
162 |
343 |
29.6 |
6.2 |
20.6 |
23-27 Jul 2010 |
816 |
11 |
107 |
6 |
201 |
1141 |
29.7 |
4 |
1.2 |
28-31 Jul 2010 |
1640 |
6 |
59 |
4 |
83 |
1792 |
25.8 |
6 |
68.66 |
01-05 Aug 10 |
10772 |
30 |
94 |
5 |
194 |
11096 |
30.0 |
2 |
2.9 |
06-10 Aug 10 |
836 |
31 |
100 |
4 |
134 |
1105 |
27.7 |
2 |
8.9 |
11-15 Aug 10 |
362 |
18 |
273 |
5 |
172 |
830 |
29.5 |
5.2 |
3.25 |
16-20 Aug 10 |
213 |
13 |
198 |
11 |
161 |
596 |
29.4 |
4.4 |
15.24 |
21-25 Aug 10 |
62 |
12 |
152 |
5 |
125 |
356 |
28.1 |
6.8 |
14.78 |
26-31 Aug 10 |
246 |
19 |
312 |
7 |
123 |
707 |
12.3 |
2.4 |
0.2 |
01-05 Sep 10 |
113 |
13 |
217 |
4 |
158 |
505 |
29.5 |
12.2 |
14.7 |
06-10 Sep 10 |
59 |
53 |
206 |
10 |
192 |
520 |
28.5 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
11-15 Sep 10 |
77 |
44 |
259 |
10 |
156 |
546 |
26.6 |
4.4 |
5.6 |
16-20 Sep 10 |
89 |
42 |
214 |
14 |
146 |
505 |
24.84 |
7.4 |
4.9 |
21-25 Sep 10 |
65 |
47 |
191 |
5 |
147 |
455 |
26.1 |
3.6 |
4.9 |
26-30 Sep 10 |
74 |
22 |
143 |
4 |
140 |
383 |
24.87 |
2.4 |
0 |
01-05 Oct 10 |
49 |
47 |
218 |
14 |
94 |
422 |
24.8 |
1.6 |
0 |
06-10 Oct 10 |
54 |
34 |
249 |
0 |
108 |
445 |
25.5 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
11-15 Oct 10 |
38 |
18 |
151 |
2 |
113 |
323 |
24.4 |
9.2 |
1.4 |
16-20 Oct 10 |
27 |
11 |
91 |
0 |
117 |
248 |
24.8 |
1.3 |
0 |
Flora of Islamabad
In Islamabad wild plants and vegetation produce pollen in huge quantity in different time of the year, among them trees produce pollen in spring and grasses produce autumn. The dominant plant species includes Pinus roxburghii, Acacia modesta, Acacia arabica, Olea ferrugenia, Dodonaea viscosa, Justicia adhatoda, Carisa opaca (garanda), Woodfordia fruticosa, Morus alba, Ficus carica, while Broussonetiapa pyrifera Islamabad (GOP, 1998).
Table 4: Summarized results of the statistical analysis pollen data in relation to the meteorological parameters for the investigated period (2009–20011).
Pair of variables |
Pearson correlation R |
p-level |
2009 |
||
Average Temp. & Total Pollen count |
-0.096 |
0.177 |
Average Temp. & Paper mulberry Pollen |
0.411** |
0.000 |
Average Temp. & Cannabis Pollen |
0.163* |
0.021 |
Average Temp. & Dandelion Pollen |
-0.297** |
0.000 |
Average Temp. & Alternanthera Pollen |
-0.111 |
0.116 |
Average Temp. & Euclyptus Pollen |
0.509** |
0.000 |
Wind speed. & Total pollen count |
-0.016 |
0.824 |
Rain fall. & total pollen count |
-0.060 |
0.420 |
2010 |
||
Average Temp. & Total Pollen count |
0.242** |
0.001 |
Average Temp. & Paper mulberry Pollen |
-0.112 |
0.115 |
Average Temp. & Cannabis Pollen |
-0.055 |
0.439 |
Average Temp. & Dandelion Pollen |
0.558** |
0.000 |
Average Temp. & Alternanthera Pollen |
0.435** |
0.000 |
Average Temp. & Euclyptus Pollen |
0.509** |
0.000 |
Wind speed. & Total pollen count |
-0.016 |
0.824 |
Rain fall. & total pollen count |
0.112 |
0.126 |
2011 |
||
Average Temp. & Total Pollen count |
0.262** |
0.000 |
Average Temp. & Paper mulberry Pollen |
0.0134 |
0.921 |
Average Temp. & Cannabis Pollen |
0.058 |
0.420 |
Average Temp. & Dandelion Pollen |
0.718** |
0.000 |
Average Temp. & Alternanthera Pollen |
0.332** |
0.000 |
Average Temp. & Eucalyptus Pollen |
0.691** |
0.000 |
Wind speed. & Total pollen count |
0.052 |
0.464 |
Rain fall. & total pollen count |
-0.078 |
0.294 |
Meteorological data
This project was carried out in collaboration with Federal Metrology department Islamabad. Pollen monitoring was carried out in the years 2009–2011. The rotorod sampler was used for pollen counting. Daily pollen concentration data and meteorological parameters were used in this study. The rod is coated with silicon grease to trap the pollen grains. The pollen grains was analyzed and counted under a microscope. Meteorological data obtained from Pakistan Meteorological Department. The following daily meteorological data were used for the analysis: Average temperature, relative air humidity, rainfall and wind speed.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 16.0 version to find out correlation between the seasons and meteorological parameters such as (average temperature, rain fall, wind speed) and average pollen count of different species. The meteorological data was calculated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, multiple regression analysis and related statistical tests were applied on the data to answer our research questions. The relationship between the pollen season and meteorological conditions in different periods was analyzed.
Results and Discussion
In 2009 the mean pollen count shows week negative correlation with average temperature, wind speed. The two variable (mean pollen count and average temp) correlations coefficient is (-096) and the p-value (0.177) (Table 7). The correlation coefficient value of wind speed and mean pollen count is (-.016) and p-value (0.824). The correlation is not significant between the variables. The airborne pollen shows negative correlation with mean total rain fall in each year. The paper mulberry means pollen count show a medium positive correlation with average temperature. The values of correlation coefficients are (0.411**) and the p-value is (.000) that are less than (0.05).
Table 5: Total pollen count of 2009 and average temperature correlation.
Correlations |
|||
Total pollen count |
Average temp |
||
Total pollen count |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
-.096 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.177 |
||
N |
200 |
200 |
|
Average temp |
Pearson correlation |
-.096 |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.177 |
||
N |
200 |
200 |
Table 6: Total pollen count of 2009 and wind speed correlation.
Correlations |
|||
Total pollen count |
Wind speed |
||
total pollen count |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
-.016 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.824 |
||
N |
200 |
200 |
|
wind speed |
Pearson correlation |
-.016 |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.824 |
||
N |
200 |
200 |
Table 7: Total pollen count of 2010 and average temperature correlation.
Correlations |
|||
Total pollen count |
Average temp |
||
Total pollen count |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
.242** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.001 |
||
N |
200 |
200 |
|
Average temp |
Pearson correlation |
.242** |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.001 |
||
N |
200 |
200 |
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
Tables 8 and 9 in 2010 the mean pollen count shows a positive correlation with average temperature and shows negative correlation with wind speed and rain fall. The value of correlation coefficient of total pollen count and average temperature is (0.242**) and p-value (0.001) that are less than (0.05) thus the correlation is significant between the variables.
Table 8: Total pollen count 2010 and wind speed correlation.
Correlations |
|||
Wind speed |
Total pollen count |
||
Total pollen count |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
-.016 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.824 |
||
N |
200 |
200 |
|
Wind speed |
Pearson correlation |
-.016 |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.824 |
||
N |
200 |
200 |
Table 9: Correlation between total pollen count of 2011 and average temperature.
Correlations |
|||
Total pollen count |
Average temp |
||
Total pollen count |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
.262** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
||
N |
199 |
199 |
|
Average temp |
Pearson correlation |
.262** |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
||
N |
199 |
199 |
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
Table 10: Total pollen count of 2011 and wind speed correlation.
Correlations |
|||
Total pollen count |
Wind speed |
||
Total pollen count |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
.052 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.464 |
||
N |
199 |
199 |
|
Wind speed |
Pearson correlation |
.052 |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.464 |
||
N |
199 |
199 |
Table 10 the paper mulberry and cannabis shows negative correlation and the dandelion, Eucalyptus and Alternanthera pollen shows a positive correlation with average temperature.
The correlation coefficient value of dandelion, Eucalyptus and Alternanthera is (0.558**), (0.509**), (0.435**) and its p-values (0.000), (0.000), (0.000) respectively. And this pollen shows negative correlation with wind speed. The correlation coefficient value of total pollen count and wind speed are (-0.016) and p-value (0.824) which are greater than (0.05) so the correlation is not significant between the variable.
Table 11: Correlation between total pollen count and total rain fall.
Correlations |
|||
Total pollen |
Total rain |
||
total pollen |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
-.772 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.438 |
||
N |
3 |
3 |
|
total rain |
Pearson correlation |
-.772 |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.438 |
||
N |
3 |
3 |
Table 13: Comparing three years peak spring data of pollen grains from (2009 to 2011) with average temperature.
Correlations |
|||
Pollen |
Temp |
||
pollen |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
.032 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.696 |
||
N |
147 |
147 |
|
temp |
Pearson correlation |
.032 |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.696 |
||
N |
147 |
147 |
Table 14: Comparing three years peak summer data of pollen grains from (2009 to 2011) with average temperature.
Correlations |
|||
Pollen |
Temp |
||
Pollen |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
.213** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.009 |
||
N |
150 |
150 |
|
Temp |
Pearson correlation |
.213** |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.009 |
||
N |
150 |
150 |
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
Tables 1, 10, 11 in 2011 the total pollen count shows medium positive correlation with average temperature and negative with wind speed and rain fall. The value of correlation coefficient between the total pollen count and average temperature is (0.262**) and p-value (0.000). The value is significantly correlated. Paper mulberry and Cannabis pollen shows no correlation with average temperature but Dandelion, Alternanthera and Eucalyptus pollen shows positive correlation with average temperature. The values of correlation coefficient between these pollen and average temperature are (0.718**), (0.332**), (0.691**) respectively and P- values is (0.000). These values show significantly positive correlation between the variables. The total pollen count increases up to optimum range (15-26 oC) of temperature, as the average temperature increases from January to August and again decrease as the average temperature decreases from September to December.
Table 15: Comparing three years peak autumn data of pollen grains from (2009 to 2011) with average temperature.
Correlations |
|||
Pollen |
Temp |
||
Pollen |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
.581** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
||
N |
150 |
150 |
|
Temp |
Pearson correlation |
.581** |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
||
N |
150 |
150 |
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
Table 16: Comparing three years peak winter data of pollen grains from (2008 to 2011) with average temperature.
Correlations |
|||
Pollen |
Temp |
||
Pollen |
Pearson correlation |
1 |
.440** |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
||
N |
150 |
150 |
|
Temp |
Pearson correlation |
.440** |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
||
N |
150 |
150 |
|
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
In 2010 maximum spring pollen record in 16-March with average temperature 21.8oC and minimum spring pollen record in 6-Mar 2010 with average temperature 17.5oC and in 2011 maximum pollen record in 24-March with average temperature 25oC and minimum pollen in 6-Mar 2011 with average temperature 13.5oC, respectively. Result also indicates that temperature increase each year. The most dominant pollen grains during this three years spring date are paper mulberry and second most prominent are Cannabis, Eucalyptus and Dandelion, respectively.
Figure 11 three summer season’s data of daily pollen count compare with daily average temperature, pollen grains show positive correlation with temperature. Maximum pollen in 2009 observes in 11-Aug with average temperature 31.2oC and minimum pollen in 20-Jul with average temperature 32.6oC, in 2010 maximum pollen record in 2-Aug with average temperature 29.7oC and minimum pollen in 23-Jul 52.5oC and in 2011 maximum summer pollen record in 13-July with average temperature 32.0oC and minimum pollen in 16-Jul with average temperature 26.8oC, respectively. The most dominant pollen during this three years summer date are paper mulberry and Dandelion, Eucalyptus and Cannabis, respectively.
Figure 12 three autumn seasons data of daily pollen count compare with daily average temperature pollen grains show positive correlation with temperature, as decrease occur in average temperature pollen concentration also decreased. Highest pollen observes in 5-Sep-2009 with average temperature 25.4 oC and minimum pollen recorded in 18-Oct-2009 with average temperature 22.5 oC, maximum pollen in 14-Sep 2010 with average temperature 26.75 oCand minimum pollen record in 18-Oct 2010 with average temperature 25.0 oC and 2011 maximum and minimum record in 6-Sep 2011 with average temperature 29.5oC and on 19-Oct 2011 with average temperature 21.3oC, respectively. The most dominant pollen grains during this three-year autumn date are Dandelion than paper mulberry, Eucalyptus and cannabis, respectively.
Figure 13 three winter seasons data of daily pollen count compare with daily average temperature pollen grains show positive correlation with temperature as daily temperature decreased air born pollen concentration also decreased. Highest pollen observes in 29-Jun-2009 with average temperature 13, 3 oC and minimum pollen recorded in 5-Jun-2009 with average temperature 6.2 oC, in 2010 maximum pollen 29-Jun 2010 with average temperature 15.2 oC and minimum pollen record in 8-Jun 2010 with average temperature 9.9 oC and 2011 maximum and minimum record in 31-Jun 2011 with average temperature 11.5 oC and on 8-Jun 2011 with average temperature 8.5 oC, respectively. The most dominant pollen grains during this three years winter date are Eucalyptus and Cannabis.
In the present study Paper mulberry, Cannabis, Alternanthera, Dandelion and Eucalyptus are the abundant pollen type, and representive vegetation of capital territory Islamabad. The meteorological parameters analyzed did not show significant variations in pollen trends. We analyzed the influence of several meteorological parameters.
According to the present daily total pollen concentration data was correlated to the daily meteorological data throughout the study period. Temperature is one of the main factors affecting the start of flowering in tree species that bloom at the beginning of spring season. For the development of every pollen there must be a particular temperature, if this particular temperature is not available pollen growth will be suffer thus affect life cycle of a plant. The same result obtained by (Sicard et al., 2012) that the mean temperature in February plays an important role in determining reproductive growth and anthesis. The mean pollen count shows positive correlation with average temperature and negative correlation with wind speed and rain fall.
In the present study throughout the year average temperature did not affect the daily mean pollen counts but only affect the flowering seasons in some plants as the temperature rises from optimum level pollen concentration also decrease. But according to (Ghufran et al., 2013) meteorological factors such as average temperature affect the concentration of daily pollen count shows positive significant correlation and negative correlation with humidity, rain fall and wind speed.
According to the present study maximum pollen count observed in the spring season (March and April) and second highest pollen count in the summer during (July and August) and lowest in the winter season in (December and January). The same result obtained by (Ghufran et al., 2013) high concentration of observed in the month of April, March and second highest peak value of pollen count was observed in the month of August, October. The lowest concentrations of pollen grains were found in January.
According to the present result of the study area the climatic factor affects the flowering season and daily pollen counts concentration for example as the temperature increases gradually in the spring that result in an increase in the pollen concentration. In the spring high concentration of pollen are due to paper mulberry. The production and dispersion of pollen depend upon the season of year. But the pollen shows no significant correlation with average temperature throughout the year. Same result observed by (Rodríguez-Rajo et al., 2004) that the variation in temperature is one of the main climatic factors that affecting the flowering season of plants in the beginning of spring and (Haroon et al., 2008) Concentration of airborne pollen is extremely high due to paper mulberry tree in the month of March. Meteorological factors such as (relative humidity, max temperature, min temperature and precipitation) affect pollen concentration its production and dispersion. These factors affect the production of paper mulberry tree pollens in March-April. According to (Weryszko et al., 2006) climatic factors such as temperature and relative humidity are the most the most important factors for the concentration of pollen in the air.
According to the present result the analysis of the relationships between the season parameters shows that the highest correlation was present between the season start date and peak date. The seasonal peak occurred earlier when the season started earlier. The seasons show significant correlation with the mean pollen count. In spring seasons, the mean pollen count is higher due to flowering period than summer, the summer mean pollen count is higher than autumn and in autumn higher from winter seasons respectively. The same result was observed by (Weryszko et al., 2006) the relationships between the season parameters shows strong correlation between the seasons start date and peak date (a positive correlation). The seasonal peak occurred earlier when the season started earlier. A high positive correlation was also found between the peak value and SPI (seasonal pollen index) as well as between the peak date and the season end date. Season that started later had shorter duration and that the peak value and SPI (Seasonal Pollen Index) were higher in a shorter season.
According to the present study the annual rain fall shows negative correlation with mean pollen count in each year. The increasing of annual rain fall result in decreases of mean pollen counts. Same result was observed by (Sicard et al., 2012) the environmental factor such as rainfall shows great influence in determining the arrival and final date of pollination. The accumulated rainfall amount during the pollination period has a negative effect on the pollen index. This may be interpreted as the wash out of airborne pollen by raindrops.
Relations between daily pollen concentrations and weather conditions such as temperature, humidity, precipitation and wind have been reported by many workers i.e., (Moseholm et al., 1987; Agashe et al., 1989) but most studies have been of single regions or under similar types of climates. However, relationships found in one area cannot always be applied to a different area because meteorological parameters are interred correlated and are dependent on a particular site (Moseholm et al., 1987).
So from the above discussion it is clear that climatic factors positively affect the daily air born pollen concentration in the atmosphere of the studied area.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The present studied sets out to explain the correlation of airborne pollen with the climatic factors and seasons to draw up guidelines for pollen occurrence from data collected over a period of three years. This study clarified that daily pollen count throughout the year depending on climatic factors. In the spring seasons the daily pollen count shows strong positive correlation with average temperature and negative correlation with rainfall as the occurrence of rain result of disappearing of pollen from atmosphere but in summer seasons the daily pollen concentration did not shows positive correlation excepting some herbaceous plants pollen. We also conclude that optimum wind speed in the atmosphere is responsible for the production and dispersion of airborne pollen. In the present study flowering seasons of plant influence the daily pollen concentration as the specific flowering seasons goes away as a result decrease occur in daily pollen concentration.
The present research covers the allergenic pollen bearing species of capital city Islamabad and it will help in controlling the pollen allergy and will help in improving the health condition of the inhabitants of the area. Future research area of pollen study should be expanded in Pakistan in order to improve health conditions in the context of allergy problems. For this research proposals should be submitted to Federal government, provincial government and HEC to provide funding for relevant lab tools, so as to control allergy problem in Pakistan.
Novelty Statement
This work is novel as it is related to the effects of allergies causing pollen grains in the atmosphere of the capital of Pakistan.
Author’s Contribution
Farooq Jan: Conducted the study
Abdu Rauf: Experimental design
Ikramullah Khan: Field supervision
Muhammad Yasin: Data analysis
Muhammad Qayash: Software applications
Hazrat Wali: Fieldwork data collection
Muhammad Luqman: Fieldwork data collection
Fayaz Asad: Hypothesis testing statistics
Muhammad Khalid: Proof reading corrections
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Alwadie, H.M., 2008. Pollen concentration in the atmosphere of Abha city, Saudi Arabia and its relationship with meteorological parameters. J. Appl. Sci., 8(5): 842-847. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.842.847
Agashe, S.N. and Alfadil, A.G., 1989. Atmospheric biopollutant monitoring in relation to meteorological parameters. Grana, 28(2), pp.97-104.
Al-Hammadi, S., Al-Maskari. F. and Bernsen. R., 2010. Prevalence of food allergy among children in Al-Ain City, United Arab Emirates. Int. Arch. Alle. Immunol., 151: 336-342.
Andersson, K. and J. Lidholm. 2003. Characteristics and immunobiology of grass pollen allergens. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 130: 87-107. https://doi.org/10.1159/000069013
Asher, M.I., Montefort, S., Bjorksten, B., Lai, C.K.W., Strachan, D.P., Weiland, S.K., 2006. Worldwide time trends in theprevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczemain childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multi country cross-sectionalsurveys. Lancet, 368.733–743.
Bano, M., 1996. Pollen allergy: Chest specialist recommneds use of air-filters. The Daily News Mar 18:3(col 1).
Beggs, P.J., 2004. Impacts of climate change on aeroallergens: past and future. Clin. Exp. Allerg., 34(10): 1507-1513.
Bousquet, J., N. Khaltaev, A.A. Cruz and J. Denburg. 2008. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on asthma (ARIA) update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA (2) LEN and AllerGen). Allergy, 63: 8-160.
Bråbäck, L., Hjern, A. and Rasmussen, F., 2004. Trends in asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema among Swedish conscripts from farming and non-farming environments. A nationwide study over three decades. Clin. Exp. Allerg., 34(1): 38-43.
Burge, H.A., 2002.An update on pollen and fungal spore aerobiology. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 110(4): 544-552. https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2002.128674
Chaturvedi, M. and K. Datta. 1995. Tree pollen in Indian environment. J. Palynol., 31: 221-228.
Dopazo, A., V. Jato and M.J. Aira. 2000. Allergenic pollen types in the atmosphere of Santiago de Compostela (NW Spain): A pollen calendar for the last six years. Bot. Helv., 110: 5160.
Eder, W., M.J. Ege and E.V. Mutius. 2006. The Asthma epidemic. N. Engl. J. Med., 355: 2226–2235. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054308
Gu, R.J., 1993. Allergic disease in clinic. Tianjin Science and technology press, Tianjin (in Chinese).
Ghufran, M.A., Hamid, N.A.I., Ali, A. and Ali, S.M., 2013. Prevalence of Allergenic pollen grains in the city of Islamabad, Pakistan and its impact on human health. Pak. J. Bot., 45: 1387-1390.
Haroon, M.A. and Rasul, G., 2008. Effect of meteorological parameters on pollen concentration in the atmosphere of Islamabad. Pakistan J. Meteorol., 4(8).
Hertzen, L. and Morais-Almeida, M., 2005. Signs of reversing trends in prevalence of asthma. 60(3): 283-92. https://doi.org10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00769.x
Hong, C.S., Hwang, Y., Oh, S.H., Kim,H.J., Huh, K.B. and Lee, S.Y., 1986. Survey of the airborne pollen in Seoul Korea. Yonsei Med. J., 27(2): 114-120.
Hussain, M., S.K. Ali, M.S. Ali, I. Ahmed, N. Jamil and M.A. Hussain. 2013. Effects of pollen Allergy on Pulmonary Function Tests, Department of Environmental Sciences, International Islamic University. J. Rawalpindi Med. Coll., 17(1): 18-21.
Jato, V., J.J. M´endez, Rodr´ıguez-Rajo and C. Seijo. 2002. The relationship between the Flowering phenophase and airborne pollen of Betula in Galicia (N.W. spain). Aerobiologia, 18: 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014987325946
Liu, Z.G., Song, J.J. and Kong, X.L. 2010. A study on pollen allergens in China. Biomed Environ. Sci., 23(4): 319-322.
Mandal, J., Chakraborty, P., Roy, I., Chatterjee, S. and Gupta-Bhattacharya, S., 2008. Prevalence of allergenic pollen grains in the aerosol of the city of Calcutta, India: A two year study. Aerobiologia, 24(3):151-164.
McConnell, T.H., 2007. The nature of disease: Pathology for the health professions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. pp. 159.
Menzel, A., Sparks, T.H., Estrella, N., Koch, E., Aasa, A., Ahas, R., Alm-Kübler, K., Bissolli, P., Braslavská, O.G., Briede, A. and Chmielewski, F.M., 2006. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biol., 12(10): 1969-1976.
Moghtaderi, M., Teshnizi, S.H. and Farjadian, S., 2017. Sensitization to common allergens among patients with allergies in major Iranian cities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol. Hlth., 39: e2017007.
Moseholm, L., Weeke, E.R. and Petersen, B.N., 1987. Forecast of pollen concentrations of Poaceae (Grasses) in the air by time series analysis. Pollen et spores. Environm. Sci., ID: 88860146.
Oh, J.W., Lee, H.B., Kang, I.J., Kim, S.W., Park, K.S., Kook, M.H., Kim, B.S., Baek, H.S., Kim, J.H., Kim, J.K. and Lee, D.J., 2012. The revised edition of Korean calendar for allergenic pollens. Allergy, Asthma Immunol. Res., 4(1): 5-11.
Ozturk, A.B., Celebioglu, E., Karakaya, G., Kalyoncu, A.F., 2013. Protective efficacy of sunglasses on the conjunctival symptoms of seasonal rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol., 3(12):1001-6.
Pacini, E. and Michael, H., 2004. Cytophysiology of pollen presentation and dispersal, Flora - Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Pl., 199(4): 273-285, https://doi.org/10.1078/0367-2530-00156.
Pokharel, P.K., Pokharel, P., Bhatta, N.K., Pandey, R.M. and Erkki, K., 2007. Asthma symptomatics school children of Sonapur. Kathmandu Univ. Med. J., 5(4): 484-487.
Qazilbash, M., Bennett, J. and Ali, A., 1997. A survey of pollen allergies in six villages of Islamabad, A publication of the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI). WP-025-002-060-1997-020.
Riaz, G., Z. Khan, M.U.F. Awan, A.A. Sardar, M. Tayyab, S.M. Malik and S. Muhammad. 2021. Multivariate analysis of weeds of chickpea, mustard and wheat crop fields of tehsil Isakhel, District Mianwali (Punjab), Pakistan. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 27(2): 153-162. https://doi.org/10.28941/pjwsr.v27i2.924
Ribeiro, H., Oliveira, M. and Abreu, I., 2008. Intradiurnal variation of allergenic pollen in the city of Porto (Portugal). Aerobiologia, 24: 173-177.
Rodriguez-Rajo, F.J., Jato, V., Dacosta, N., Aira, M.J., 2004. Heat and chill requirements of Fraxinus flowering in Galicia (NW Spain). Grana, 43: 217-223.
Sahney, M. andChaurasia, S., 2008. Seasonal variations of airborne pollen in Allahabad, India. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med., 15: 287-293.
Sicard, P., Thibaudon, M., Besancenot, J.P. and Mangin, A., 2012. Forecast models and trends for the main characteristics of the Olea pollen season in Nice (south-eastern France) over the 1990–2009 period. Grana, 51(1): 52-62.
Smart, I.J., Tuddenham, W.G. and Knox, R.B., 1979. Aerobiology of grass pollen in the city of Melbourne: Effects of weather parameters and pollen sources. Aust. J. Bot., 27: 333-342.
Tehrani, M., Sankian, M., Assarehzadegan, M.A., Falak, R., Jabbari, F. and Varasteh, A., 2010. Immunochemical characterization of Amaranthus retroflexus pollen extract: extensive cross-reactive allergenic components among the four species of Amaranthaceae/Chenopodiaceae. Iran. J. Allerg. Asthma Immunol., 9(2): 87-95.
U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research 2003. Climate Change Science Program Weather and climate extremes in a changing climate. Regions of focus: North America, Hawaii, Caribbean, and U.S. Pacific Islands. A report by the Karl TR, Meehl GA, Miller CD, Hassol SJ, Waple AM, Murray WL (editors), Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center. pp.164.
Walker, S., Khan-Wasti, S., Fletcher, M., Cullinan, P., Harris, J. and Sheikh, A. 2007. Seasonal allergic rhinitis is associated with a detrimental effect on examination performance in United Kingdom teenagers: Case-control study. J. Allerg. Clin. Immunol., 120(2): 381-387.
Weryszko-Chmielewska, E., Puc, M. and Piotrowska, K., 2006. Effect of meteorological factors on Betula, Fraxinus and Quercus pollen concentrations in the atmosphere of Lublin and Szczecin, Poland. Annals Agric. Environ.Med., 13(2): 243.
Zafar, M., M.A. Khan, M. Ahmad and S. Sultana. 2006. Palynological and Taxonomic studies of some weeds from flora from Rawalpindi. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 21(4): 99-109.
Zeb, S., Perveen, A. and Khan, M., 2017. Analysis of protein profile and pollen morphology of Guaiacum officinale Linn. Pak. J. Bot., 49(4): 1497-1500
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?