Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Wastewater Irrigation Possess a Risk on Food Chain, Health, and its Treatment with Constructed Wetlands

JIS_7_2_258-266

Review Article

Wastewater Irrigation Possess a Risk on Food Chain, Health, and its Treatment with Constructed Wetlands

Hasnain Raza1*, Maryam Maqsood2, Muhammad Muzamil Nazir1, Iqra Tariq1, Kaynat Ahmed1, Qurat-ul-Ain1, Ali Raza2, Huda Bilal3, Muhammad Bilal Shoukat1, Attiq ur Rehman1, Awais Rasheed1 and Muhammad Zeshan Gulzar1

1Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan; 2Department of Food Science and Technology, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan; 3Institute of Plant Protection, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.

Abstract | Currently, wastewater irrigation is increasing to combat the depletion of freshwater resources and the water stress caused by climate change. In many countries, wastewater irrigation has been highlighted as a serious environmental concern due to heavy metal buildup in soils and food crops, as well as potential health hazards to humans from ingesting these foods. Human health hazards are becoming more crucial as wastewater irrigation increases because exposure to a variety of toxins must be evaluated against the advantages to food security and livelihoods. By irrigating treated wastewater, the danger of human exposure to heavy metal contamination can be considerably minimized. Innovative solutions to this universal problem are being provided through eco-technologies, such as constructed wetlands (CWs). CWs are among the most widely used natural water management options. CWs can be used for phytoremediation, which acts as a natural sink for toxins. The present paper aims to provide a brief discussion on wastewater health risks, CWs, and its phytoremediation attributes as a plant-based cleanup solution for wastewater remediation.


Received | August 03, 2021; Accepted | September 22, 2021; Published | November 08, 2021

*Correspondence | Hasnain Raza, Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan; Email: Hasnainraza662@gmail.com

Citation | Raza, H., M. Maqsood, M.M. Nazir, I. Tariq, K. Ahmed, Q-u. Ain, A. Raza, H. Bilal, M.B. Shoukat, A. Rehman, A. Rasheed and M.Z. Gulzar. 2021. Wastewater irrigation possess a risk on food chain, health, and its treatment with constructed wetlands. Journal of Innovative Sciences, 7(2): 258-266.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jis/2021/7.2.258.266

Keywords | Wastewater irrigation, Food chain, Health, Constructed wetlands, Phytoremediation



1. Introduction

In 2050, the global population is predicted to reach 9.5 billion people, requiring an additional 60% increase in food production (Mbow et al., 2019). Freshwater scarcity is a global issue, with 60% of the world’s population expected to face a shortage by 2025 (Alexandratos and Bruinsma, 2012). Between 2006 and 2017, Pakistan’s per capita water availability decreased from 1100 to 908 m3 (Imran et al., 2018). To meet the demands, agriculture must cut off its share of freshwater usage and search for alternative supplies, due to the growing imbalance between supply and demand, as well as the expected effects of climate change. Agricultural use of water and wastewater is currently the highest in the world, accounting for over 70% of total water usage (Winpenny et al., 2010).

Wastewater reuse is becoming more popular as a way to fulfill the growing demand for water. This resource, in general, comprises significant concentrations of both helpful nutrients and hazardous contaminants, which present both prospects and challenges for agriculture (Alghobar and Suresha, 2017). As a result, irrigation with municipal or industrial wastewater for a long time may result in a heavy metal deposition in soils and plants (Singh et al., 2010). Since heavy metals are non-biodegradable and have a lengthy biological half-life, they can accumulate in body parts, their contamination in soils and crops has been considered a serious environmental hazard (Khan et al., 2010; Muhammad et al., 2011).

The removal of pollutants from wastewater is extremely important to minimize the threat to public health and the environment. The wastewater is treated through various conventional and non-conventional methods including reverse osmosis (Al-Alawy and Salih, 2017), chemical precipitation (Huang et al., 2017), adsorption, and solvent extraction (Burakov et al., 2018), are some of the conventional and non-conventional technologies used to treat wastewater. However, for the removal of unwanted toxic materials, most of these approaches are very expensive, inefficient, time-consuming, and need a large capital investment (Bolisetty et al., 2019). An environment-friendly and cost-effective indigenous wastewater treatment system is urgently needed to treat wastewater contaminated with heavy metals and pollutants (Ashraf et al., 2018). For wastewater treatment in developing countries like Pakistan, constructed wetlands (CWs) are an environmentally friendly, energy-efficient, and low-cost option.

1.1 Wastewater irrigation a global health challenge

Wastewater irrigation of food crops is a common practice in urban, suburban, and rural areas around the world, and it has gained popularity in recent years in water-scarce areas (Hajjami et al., 2013). Its continued usage on agricultural fields has the potential to contaminate and compromise the safety of the food crops produced (Hu et al., 2013), it poses a significant risk to humans through feeding on contaminated food crops. The generation of worldwide wastewater is projected to be 1500 billion m3 per year (Kachenko and Singh, 2006). Wastewater is used to irrigate approximately 20 million hectares of land in 50 countries (Abaidoo et al., 2010).

Pakistan generates 6.414 billion m3 of wastewater annually, receiving 4.953 billion m3 from municipal and 0.395 billion m3 from industry (Yamin et al., 2015). In agriculture, 0.876 billion m3 of wastewater from the total wastewater produced is being used for crop production (Murtaza et al., 2010), by irrigating about 32500 ha of land. Almost one-tenth of the crops in the world is irrigated with untreated wastewater (Qadir et al., 2007). Untreated wastewater contains a wide variety of pollutants from agricultural, municipal, and industrial sources. Farmers, their families, people living near wastewater irrigation, and consumers of wastewater-irrigated crops are all at risk from excreta-related infections, skin irritants, and hazardous compounds originating from these sources (Qadir et al., 2007). Heavy metal exposure from contaminated foods or inhalation of irrigated soil or occupational ingestion has been related to a wide range of chronic health problems, including cadmium, arsenic, lead, and mercury poisoning.

 

Table 1: Effects of heavy metals on humans.

Heavy metals

Toxic form

Effects on Humans

References

Cr

Cr+6

Cancer of respiratory tract, nose ulcers, and multi-organ toxicity

(Medda and Mondal, 2017)

Hg

Methylmercury (Me Hg)

Neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, Gastrointestinal and carcinogenesis

(Azevedo et al., 2018); (Gardner et al., 2010)

Cd

Cd+2

Renal dysfunction, risk of lung cancer, bone demineralization and impair lung function

(Loi et al., 2018)

Pb

Pb+2

Damage to the reproductive system, affect CNS and PNS and kidney failure

(Zhou et al., 2018)

As

As+3

Portal fibrosis, neurologic, cardiovascular, developmental anomalies, carcinoma, and hematologic disorders

(Signes-Pastor et al., 2019); (Abbas et al., 2018)

Ni

Ni salts and dust

Diarrhea, lungs and nasal cancer, vomiting, and dermatitis

(Ahmad and Ashraf, 2012)

Zn

Zn+2

Cytotoxicity, Hematological change, Detrimental effect on neuronal development, immunity, and growth

(Maurya et al., 2019); (Plum et al., 2010)

Cu

Cu salts and fumes

Kidneys and liver damage, hypotension, gastrointestinal discomfort, hematemesis, and melena

(Sheldon and Menzies, 2005)

 

Food contamination with heavy metals is a major contributing channel to human exposure (more than 90%), surpassing other paths such as dermal contact and inhalation (Loutfy et al., 2006). Heavy metals have a negative impact on human and animal populations even at low concentrations (Uzu et al., 2011a, b) by causing nervous, cardiovascular, mental impairment, kidney and bone diseases (Yargholi et al., 2008). Acute and chronic exposure can result in dermal, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, hematological, neurological, hepatic, developmental, immunological, reproductive, genotoxic, carcinogenic, and mutagenic effects e.g., liver cancer (Lin et al., 2013). The detail about effects of heavy metals on human are given in (Table 1).

1.2 Impact of heavy metals in soils

Due to the tremendous expansion of the industry sector, more effluents are being released into the environment, contaminating soil and water, and accumulating in living organisms. Heavy metals can’t be degraded into less harmful forms, they have long-term environmental impacts when they are discharged haphazardly into the soil and rivers (Dixit et al., 2015). Heavy metal pollution of soil is a worldwide issue that affects human health and agricultural production (Liu et al., 2018). Heavy metals are found in agricultural soils due to natural and anthropogenic sources (Rahimi et al., 2017; Ratul et al., 2018).

Agricultural soil becomes contaminated when wastewater is used to irrigate it (Hajjami et al., 2013). Long-term wastewater application causes a heavy metal build-up in soil and crops, which affects crop toxicity, soil functioning, food chain contamination, and vegetable nutritional quality (Chen et al., 2010; Singh et al., 2010). Heavy metals bio accumulate into vegetables, crops, and humans as a result of continual ingestion.

1.3 Toxicity of heavy metals and their bioaccumulation through food chain contamination

Anthropogenic activities, such as industrial processes, release Heavy metals into the environment, resulting in the accumulation of heavy metals toxicity in living organisms (Koivula et al., 2011). Agrochemicals, industrialization, and fossil fuel burning discharge a variety of heavy metals, which are the primary source for pollution such as mercury (Hg), arsenic (As), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr) and cadmium (Cd) into water channels and soils (Kumar et al., 2019a; b). Bioaccumulation occurs when Heavy metals are ingested by plants and subsequently biomagnified when top consumers consume them (Pollard et al., 2014). Once heavy metals enters the food chain, they can’t be removed easily from the top of the chain, and they’re spread out across the entire food web.

There are several hyper-accumulated plants that are used as food by humans and animals alike. As heavy metals have a potential to persist in the environment, produce a variety of negative impacts because plants carry them from the soil to humans. The extent of contamination in crops is determined by the effectiveness of the soil-to-plant transfer. Possibly harmful health effects could result from the consumption of contaminated crops containing heavy metals (Clemens and Ma, 2016). Vegetables are an essential part of the human diet because they contain essential nutrients and minerals (Nankishore, 2014). Unfortunately, plants can absorb and store heavy metals in both edible and inedible parts of their bodies, exceeding the permissible limits (Tasrina et al., 2015). In the last few years, high quantities of heavy metals have been detected in vegetables (leaves, roots, and fruits) (Wai et al., 2017) in detailed (Table 2). During the transition from one sector of the food chain to the next, several heavy metals have the potential to accumulate in the tissues of top consumers (liver, feathers, muscles, kidneys, and other organs).

1.4 Constructed wetlands an efficient option for wastewater treatment

Constructed wetlands (CWs) are an efficient wastewater treatment systems that use physical, chemical, and biological processes which are similar to those found in natural treatment wetlands (Uysal, 2013). CWs have been used to reduce pollution in the environment by eliminating various contaminants from wastewater, including heavy metals, organic compounds, nutrients, suspended solids, and pathogens (Gikas and Tchobanoglous, 2009). Over the last 50 years, the use of CWs is a common wastewater treatment technique in many countries.

Furthermore, it is a viable alternative treatment technology to traditional wastewater treatment methods due to their high pollution removal efficiency, low energy requirements, ease of operation and maintenance, high water recycling rate, and potential for providing significant natural habitat for flora and

 

Table 2: Heavy metals bioaccumulation in different vegetable organs.

Vegetables

Plant organ Analyzed

Heavy metals

Concentration (mg/kg)

Reference

Coriandrum sativum,

Lepidium sativum, Spinacia olarecea

Leaves

Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As,

Pb, Cd, and Cr

Co– 0.005-0.21

Ni – 0.04-0.81

Cu – 0.59-2.23

Zn – 1.7 - 6.7

As–0.018-0.126

Pb – 0.2-4.7

Cr – 0.1-1.87

Cd – 0.02-0.52

(Souri et al., 2018)

Solanum Lycopersicum,

Brassica oleracea, Capsicum annuum

Edible parts

Pb and Cd

Pb – BDL-0.05,

Cd – 0.01-0.07

(Ametepey et al., 2018)

Anolis lividus, Basella alba, Trichosanthes cucumerina, Cucurbita moschata, Spinacia oleracea

Edible parts

Ni, Cu, Cd, Pb, Cr,

and Zn

Zn - 19.762

Pb - 3.699

Cu - 9.373

Ni - 2.92

Cd - 0.168

Cr - 1.127

(Ratul et al., 2018)

Solanum melongena

Edible parts

Cd, Ni, and Pb

Cd – 0.07-11.14

Ni – 0.01-4.82

Pb – 0.88-42.7

(Youssef and Abd El-Gawad, 2018)

Cucumis melo,

Solanum melongena,

Pinacia oleracea

Edible parts

Mn, Cd, Cr, Ni, Cu, Fe, and Zn

Cr – 2.7-3.7

Mn – 18.7-137

Cu – 22.2-65

Cd – 0.05-0.39

Ni – 1.8-5.05

Zn – 19.5-41

Fe – 129-968

(Latif et al., 2018)

Cucurbita maxima,

Solanum lycopersicum

Fruits

Pb, Zn, Cu, and Cd

Cu – 0.38-7.7

Zn – 1.1-128.5

Pb –up to 14.2

Cd – up to 2.2

(Zafarzadeh et al., 2018)

Lactuca sativa

Leaves, Roots, and Shoots

Cu

Cu – 0.5-2.3

(Shiyab, 2018)

Lycopersicon esculentum,

Abelmoschus esculentus

Fruits

Pb, Cd, Ni, and Zn

Cd – 0.01-0.05

Pb – 0.53-1.39

Zn – 0.02-0.09

Ni – 0.31-0.86

(Ali et al., 2017)

 

fauna (Kadlec and Wallace, 2008). Different aquatic floating plants play an important role in the detoxification process in CW by absorbing pollutants directly into their tissues. To remove toxins from wastewater, these plants use physicochemical and biological methods (DalCorso et al., 2019), which help in the remediation process (Khan and Faisal, 2018).

The main functions of plants in constructed wetlands are, provision of physical effect through its roots which helps some physical treatment in a wetland such as filtering effect, velocity reduction, promotion of sedimentation, decreased resuspension, prevention of medium clogging, improved hydraulic conductivity (Uysal, 2013), plants roots are used as a base for microorganisms, under this function plants provide a surface for microbial attachment and release of gas and exudates, also plant roots release oxygen that increased aerobic degradation and supports precipitation of heavy metals (Shelef et al., 2013). Metal uptake is done through phytoremediation processes, (in detailed Table 3) also plants increase evapotranspiration that accelerates water loss in the wetland (Dalcorso et al., 2019). Plants provide microclimatic conditions such as light attenuation that reduces algal growth, insulation from frost in the winter, insulation from radiation in the spring, reduced wind velocity as well as stabilization of the sediment surface (Chao et al., 2014). The major aquatic plants that are used for the treatment of wastewater in constructed wetlands are Pistia stratiotes (water cabbage), Typha latifolia (cattail), Pistia stratiotes (Water lettuce), Lemna gibba (duckweed), common reed (Phragrmites), Eichhornia crassipes (Water hyacinth), Centella Asiatica (Pennywort) and Alternanthera philoxeroides (Alligator weed) (Wang et al., 2015).

 

Table 3: Potential of constructed wetlands by using plants for the removal of heavy metals.

Type of constructed wetlands

Plants species

Contaminants treated

Reference

Floating treatment wetlands

Typha domingensis

Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd

(Bauer et al., 2021)

Constructed wetlands microcosms

Typha latifolia

Fe, Cu

(Meitei and Prasad, 2021)

Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands

Hydrilla verticillata, Water hyacinth, T. latifolia and Echornia crassipes

Cu, Pb, Cd, and Cr

(Wang et al., 2021)

Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands

Phragmites australis

Pb, As, and Fe

(Lizama-Allende et al., 2021)

Natural Wetlands

P. australis

Cr, Fe, Zn, and Pb

(Attili, 2020)

Free water surface constructed wetlands

L. paucicostads

V, Cd, Pb, and Cr

(Ekperusi et al., 2019)

Natural wetlands

S. polyrhiza, Echornia crassipes and Pistia stratiotes

Cu, Fe, Zn, Cd, Cr, and N

(Rai, 2019)

Constructed wetlands microcosms

Alocasia puber

Zn, Cd, Cu, Cr, and Ni

(Thani et al., 2019)

Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands

Aster amellus, Tagetes patula, Gaillardia grandiflora and Portulaca grandiflora

Mn, Cu, and Fe

(Chandanshive et al., 2018)

Horizontal constructed wetlands

P. australis Cav. Trin. ex Steud, Canna indica L. T. latifolia L., and Hydrocotyle umbellata L. 

Pb, Cu, Mg, Co, Zn, and Cd

(Ali et al., 2018)

Vertical surface flow constructed wetlands

T. latifolia, Cyperus alternifolius, and Cynodon dactylon

Cr, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, and Fe

(Mustapha et al., 2018)

Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands

P. australis

Cd, Pb, and Cr

(Šíma et al., 2017)

Free water surface constructed wetlands

T. latifolia, P. australis

Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn

(Gill et al., 2017)

Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands, vertical flow constructed wetlands

P. australis, T. latifolia

Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cr

(Papaevangelou et al., 2017)

Free water surface constructed wetlands

Azolla pinnata

Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Pb

(Akinbile et al., 2016)

Horizontal flow constructed wetlands

V. zizanioides

Ni, Cr, Pb, and Zn

(Bakhshoodeh et al., 2016)

Vertical flow constructed wetlands

Erianthus arundinaceus, Typha angustifolia and P. australis.

Cu, Zn, Mn, Ni, Fe, and Cd

(Arivoli et al., 2015)

Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands

T. latifolia, P. australis

Cr, Cd, Pb, Hg, and As

(He et al., 2015)

Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands

T. latifolia, P. australis

Cu, Zn, and Pb

(Kumari and Tripathi, 2015)

Vertical flow constructed wetlands

V. zizanioides

Mg, Ni, and Zn

(Mudhiriza et al., 2015)

Horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands

T. latifolia, P. australis

Cu, Cr, Zn, Pb, and As

(Rai et al., 2015)

Vegetative submerged bed constructed wetlands

Phragmites karka and Veteveria nigritana

Fe, Pb, Mn, Zn, Cr, and Mg

(Badejo et al., 2015)

 

Conclusions and Recommendations

Water resources are under threat because of the growing population. Wastewater treatment is one of many countries’ major concerns, as rising levels of unwanted or unknown pollutants are extremely hazardous to human health and the environment. We looked at the environmental and public health concerns related to the use of untreated wastewater in agriculture in this paper. There is a significant correlation between wastewater irrigation and concentrations of heavy metals and their existence (retention) in soil and accumulation in the crops, vegetables, and plants. Therefore, wastewater irrigation poses a health risk by contaminating the food chain through the consumption of contaminated crops and vegetables. We have focused on the current state of affairs concerning wastewater treatment with the constructed wetland with phytoremediation. Constructed wetland is an efficient, reliable, and active biogeochemical method for the removal of pollutants from wastewater. Several processes such as sedimentation volatilization, microbial activity, adsorption, filtration, and phytoaccumulation are used in CW to remove contaminants. In CW different aquatic floating plants plays a vital role in the enhancement of decontamination process by directly accumulating pollutants in their tissues. These plants utilize some physiochemical and biological processes to remove contaminants from wastewater, which help in remediation process.

Novelty Statement

Wastewater reuse is becoming more popular as a way to fulfill the growing demand of water for irrigation purpose. We have focused on the current state of affairs concerning wastewater treatment with the constructed wetland with phytoremediation. Constructed wetland is an efficient, reliable, and active biogeochemical method for the removal of pollutants from wastewater.

Author’s Contribution

Hasnain Raza, Muhammad Muzamil Nazir, Muhammad Bilal Shoukat, and Attiq ur Rehman planed the work and gather the information related to the constructed wetland, and Iqra Tariq, Kaynat Ahmed, Qurat-ul-Ain, Awais Rasheed, and Muhammad Zeshan Gulzar wrote the portion of the water scarcity of the manuscript Maryam Maqsood and Ali Raza has done the portion of Food chain and health. Huda Bilal reviewed this article and gave fruitful suggestions and format the manuscript according to the journal.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Abaidoo, R.C., Keraita, B., Drechsel, P., Dissanayake, P. and Maxwell, A.S., 2010. Soil and crop contamination through wastewater irrigation and options for risk reduction in developing countries. Soil biology and agriculture in the tropics. Springer, pp. 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05076-3_13

Al-Alawy, A.F. and Salih, M.H., 2017. Comparative study between nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for the removal of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater. Journal of Engineering, 23(4): 1–21.

Alexandratos, N. and Bruinsma, J., 2012. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision.

Alghobar, M.A. and Suresha, S., 2017. Evaluation of metal accumulation in soil and tomatoes irrigated with sewage water from Mysore city, Karnataka, India. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 16(1): 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2015.02.002

Ashraf, S., Afzal, M., Naveed, M., Shahid, M. and Ahmad, Z., 2018. Endophytic bacteria enhance remediation of tannery effluent in constructed wetlands vegetated with Leptochloa fusca. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 20(2):121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1337072

Bolisetty, S., Peydayesh, M. and Mezzenga, R., 2019. Sustainable technologies for water purification from heavy metals: Review and analysis. Chemical Society Reviews, 48: https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00493E

Burakov, A.E., Galunin, E.V., Burakova, I.V., Kucherova, A.E., Agarwal, S., Tkachev, A.G. and Gupta, V.K., 2018. Adsorption of heavy metals on conventional and nanostructured materials for wastewater treatment purposes: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 148: 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.034

Chao, W., Zheng, S., Wang, P. and Jin, Q., 2014. Effects of vegetations on the removal of contaminants in aquatic environments: A review. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 26(4): 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(14)60057-3

Chen, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Y., Yang, X., Qiao, J., Tian, Q. and Zhang, Q., 2010. Health risks of heavy metals in sewage‐irrigated soils and edible seeds in Langfang of Hebei province, China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90(2): 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3817

Clemens, S. and Ma, J.F., 2016. Toxic heavy metal and metalloid accumulation in crop plants and foods. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 67: 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112301

DalCorso, G., Fasani, E., Manara, A., Visioli, G. and Furini, A., 2019. Heavy metal pollutions: State of the art and innovation in phytoremediation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(14): 3412. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143412

Dixit, R., Malaviya, D., Pandiyan, K., Singh, U.B., Sahu, A., Shukla, R., Singh, B.P., Rai, J.P., Sharma, P.K. and Lade, H., 2015. Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: An overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability, 7(2): 2189–2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7022189

Gikas, P. and Tchobanoglous, G., 2009. The role of satellite and decentralized strategies in water resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1): 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.016

Hajjami, K., Ennaji, M.M., Fouad, S., Oubrim, N. and Cohen, N., 2013. Wastewater reuse for irrigation in Morocco: Helminth eggs contamination’s level of irrigated crops and sanitary risk (a case study of Settat and Soualem regions). J. Bacteriol. Parasitol., 4(1): 1–5.

Hu, J., Wu, F., Wu, S., Cao, Z., Lin, X. and Wong, M.H., 2013. Bioaccessibility, dietary exposure and human risk assessment of heavy metals from market vegetables in Hong Kong revealed with an in vitro gastrointestinal model. Chemosphere, 91(4): 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.066

Huang, H., Liu, J., Zhang, P., Zhang, D. and Gao, F., 2017. Investigation on the simultaneous removal of fluoride, ammonia nitrogen and phosphate from semiconductor wastewater using chemical precipitation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 307: 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.134

Imran, S., Bukhari, L.N. and Ashraf, M., 2018. Spatial and temporal trends in river water quality of Pakistan (Sutlej and Ravi) 2018. Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources, pp. 201845.

Kachenko, A.G. and Singh, B., 2006. Heavy metals contamination in vegetables grown in urban and metal smelter contaminated sites in Australia. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 169(1): 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-2027-1

Kadlec, R.H. and Wallace, S., 2008. Treatment wetlands. CRC press.

Khan, H.N. and Faisal, M., 2018. Phytoremediation of industrial wastewater by hydrophytes. Phytoremediation. Springer, pp. 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99651-6_8

Khan, S., Rehman, S., Khan, A.Z., Khan, M.A. and Shah, M.T., 2010. Soil and vegetables enrichment with heavy metals from geological sources in Gilgit, northern Pakistan. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 73(7):1820–1827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.08.016

Koivula, M.J., Kanerva, M., Salminen, J.-P., Nikinmaa, M. and Eeva, T., 2011. Metal pollution indirectly increases oxidative stress in great tit (Parus major) nestlings. Environmental Research, 111(3): 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.005

Kumar, A., Chaturvedi, A.K., Yadav, K., Arunkumar, K.P., Malyan, S.K., Raja, P., Kumar, R., Khan, S.A., Yadav, K.K. and Rana, K.L., 2019a. Fungal phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated resources: Current scenario and future prospects. Recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi. Springer, pp. 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25506-0_18

Kumar, V., Thakur, R.K. and Kumar, P., 2019b. Assessment of heavy metals uptake by cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) grown in integrated industrial effluent irrigated soils: A prediction modeling study. Scientia Horticulturae, 257: 108682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108682

Lin, H.J., Sung, T.I., Chen, C.Y. and Guo, H.R., 2013. Arsenic levels in drinking water and mortality of liver cancer in Taiwan. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 262: 1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.12.049

Liu, L., Li, W., Song, W., and Guo, M., 2018. Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Science of the Total Environment, 633: 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.161

Loutfy, N., Fuerhacker, M., Tundo, P., Raccanelli, S., El Dien, A.G. and Ahmed, M.T., 2006. Dietary intake of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs, due to the consumption of dairy products, fish/seafood and meat from Ismailia city, Egypt. Science of the Total Environment, 370(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.05.012

Mbow, C., Rosenzweig, C., Barioni, L.G., Benton, T.G., Herrero, M., Krishnapillai, M. and Waha, K., 2019. Chapter 5: Food security. IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Land, online at https://www. ipcc. ch/site/assets/uploads.

Muhammad, S., Shah, M.T. and Khan, S., 2011. Health risk assessment of heavy metals and their source apportionment in drinking water of Kohistan region, northern Pakistan. Microchemical Journal, 98(2): 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2011.03.003

Murtaza, G., Ghafoor, A., Qadir, M., Owens, G., Aziz, M.A. and Zia, M.H., 2010. Disposal and use of sewage on agricultural lands in Pakistan: A review. Pedosphere, 20(1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60279-4

Nankishore, A., 2014. Heavy metal levels in leafy vegetables from selected markets in Guyana. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 10(3): 651–663.

Pollard, A.J., Reeves, R.D. and Baker, A.J.M., 2014. Facultative hyperaccumulation of heavy metals and metalloids. Plant Science, 217: 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.11.011

Qadir, M., Sharma, B.R., Bruggeman, A., Choukr-Allah, R. and Karajeh, F., 2007. Non-conventional water resources and opportunities for water augmentation to achieve food security in water scarce countries. Agricultural Water Management, 87(1): 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.03.018

Rahimi, G., Kolahchi, Z. and Charkhabi, A., 2017. Uptake and translocation of some heavy metals by rice crop (Oryza sativa) in paddy soils. Agriculture/Pol’nohospodárstvo, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/agri-2017-0016

Ratul, A.K., Hassan, M., Uddin, M.K., Sultana, M.S., Akbor, M.A. and Ahsan, M.A., 2018. Potential health risk of heavy metals accumulation in vegetables irrigated with polluted river water. International Food Research Journal, 25(1).

Shelef, O., Gross, A. and Rachmilevitch, S., 2013. Role of plants in a constructed wetland: current and new perspectives. Water, 5(2): 405–419. https://doi.org/10.3390/w5020405

Singh, A., Sharma, R., Agrawal, M. and Marshall, F., 2010. Health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary intake of foodstuffs from the wastewater irrigated site of a dry tropical area of India. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48: 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.041

Tasrina, R.C., Rowshon, A., Mustafizur, A.M.R., Rafiqul, I. and Ali, M.P., 2015. Heavy metals contamination in vegetables and its growing soil. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2(142): 2.

Uysal, Y., 2013. Removal of chromium ions from wastewater by duckweed, Lemna minor L. by using a pilot system with continuous flow. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 263: 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.006

Uzu, Gaëlle, Sauvain, J.-J., Baeza-Squiban, A., Riediker, M., Sánchez Sandoval Hohl, M., Val, S., Tack, K., Denys, S., Pradère, P. and Dumat, C., 2011a. In vitro assessment of the pulmonary toxicity and gastric availability of lead-rich particles from a lead recycling plant. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(18): 7888–7895. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200374c

Uzu, Gaelle, Sobanska, S., Sarret, G., Sauvain, J.-J., Pradere, P. and Dumat, C., 2011b. Characterization of lead-recycling facility emissions at various workplaces: Major insights for sanitary risks assessment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186(2–3): 1018–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.086

Wai, K.-M., Dai, J., Peter, K.N., Zhou, X. and Wong, C.M.S., 2017. Public health risk of mercury in China through consumption of vegetables, a modelling study. Environmental Research, 159: 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.010

Wang, C.-Y., Sample, D.J., Day, S.D. and Grizzard, T.J., 2015. Floating treatment wetland nutrient removal through vegetation harvest and observations from a field study. Ecological Engineering, 78: 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.05.018

Winpenny, J., Heinz, I., Koo-Oshima, S., Salgot, M., Collado, J., Hernandez, F. and Torricelli, R., 2010. The wealth of waste: The economics of wastewater use in agriculture. Water Reports, (35):

Yamin, M., Nasir, A., Sultan, M., Ismail, W.I.W., Shamshiri, R. and Akbar, F.N., 2015. Impact of sewage and industrial effluents on water quality in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Advances in Environmental Biology, 9(18): 53–59.

Yargholi, B., Azimi, A.A., Baghvand, A., Liaghat, A.M. and Fardi, G.A., 2008. Investigation of cadmium absorption and accumulation in different parts of some vegetables. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 3(3): 357–364.

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Journal of Innovative Sciences

December

Vol.9, Iss.2, Pages 192-241

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe