Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Study on Prevalence of Gastro Intestinal Helminths of Large and Small Ruminants in District Haripur

SJA_39_3_625-631

Research Article

Study on Prevalence of Gastro Intestinal Helminths of Large and Small Ruminants in District Haripur

Ishtiaq Ahmed1*, Hamid Ullah2, Zubair Ali2, Muhammad Sohail2, Yasir Amin2 and Afrasyab1

1Veterinary Research and Disease Investigation Laboratory Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan; 2Veterinary Research and Disease Investigation Centre Abbottabad, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.

Abstract | A wide variety of gastro-intestinal (GI) helminthes have been associated with morbidity and mortality in large and small ruminants. Substantial parasitic load in these animals is characterized by symptoms like diarrhea, poor weight gain, rough body coat, gastro intestinal disturbance like lack of appetite, reduced milk production, alopecia and bottle jaw. The study on prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths parasite of large and small ruminants was conducted in and around district Haripur. Faecal samples (n=633) were randomly collected and were examined for the presence of helminths parasites, in which 463 (73.0%) were found positive for the eggs of different GIT helminths. Seven species of parasites including: Eimeria Spp, Ascaris spp., Strongyloid spp., Fasciola spp. Trichuris spp. Monezia spp. and Schistoma bovis. as well as mixed species were identified as per their intensity. It was noted that prevalence was highest in goat (80%) followed by buffalo (74%), cattle (71.27%) and sheep (68.08%). The Eimeria spp. was highest (35.27%) followed Buffallo (28.35%) and trichuris spp. 16.41%. Similarly, Ascaris spp. was higher in buffallo (56.71%) followed by cattle (12.1%). Eimeria spp. was highest in Goats (26.41%) followed by sheep (18.75%). The ascaris spp. was higher in goats (13.2 %) followed by sheep (5%), While, Fasciola spp. was higher (15.60%) in sheep than goats (4.70%). Therefore, it is recommended that proper managemental practices, strategic anthelmintic protocols as per regular faecal examination and awareness of farmers regarding husbandry practices may be implemented in the study area to boost the economy of the farmers.


Received | June 13, 2022; Accepted | June 14, 2023; Published | August 03, 2023

*Correspondence | Ishtiaq Ahmed, Veterinary Research and Disease Investigation Laboratory Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan; Email: ishtiaq1079@gmail.com

Citation | Ahmed, I., H. Ullah, Z. Ali, M. Sohail, Y. Amin and Afrasyab. 2023. Study on prevalence of gastro intestinal helminths of large and small ruminants in District Haripur. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 39(3): 625-631.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2023/39.3.625.631

Keywords | Gastrointestinal Parasites, Buffalo, Cattle, Sheep and goats, Prevalence, Haripur

Copyright: 2023 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

Livestock plays a fundamental role in the improvement of social and economic status of the poor rural folks in Pakistan. In Pakistan, livestock farming is mainly categorized in the following categories that is, very small scale to at domestic level to medium and large commercial farms. These all have different managemental practices and production levels. From the last hundred years, livestock has proved itself, the best source of providing quality protein through milk and meat and thus it is a potential source of food security and generation of income. The byproducts of animals in the form of hides, bones and dung are also indirectly a source in uplifting the economy through their related industries and improving crop production in agricultural practices, respectively. According to economic survey of Pakistan for year 2021, a total contribution of agricultural sector was 60.1 % in GDP while 11.8 % from livestock sector has been reported.

The population of cattle and Buffaloes was estimated at 51.5 and 42.4 million heads, respectively. Both of these are major milk producing species of domestic ruminants, producing about 61,720 million tons of milk (Memon et al., 2021).

There is very poor awareness of the livestock farmers located in rural areas about regular deworming practices of their domesticated animals. Subsequently other managemental practices like poor housing, energy, protein as well as mineral deficient nutrition, contaminated and soiled water are mainly affecting health of these animals. There is heavy infestation of both endo and ectoparasitism found in these animals (Dagnachew et al., 2011). These different types of parasites cause morbidity and mortality, reduced milk and meat production (Dagnachew et al., 2011; Di-Cerbo et al., 2010). Parasitic infestation exerts negative impact on the health status, meat and milk production, increased treatment and production cost, hence, badly affected economic status of livestock farming (Fazlullah, 2016).

Helminths and protozoal species are mainly responsible for endoparasitism in small and large domestic ruminants (Asif et al., 2008). Eimeria spp. is a protozoa belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa, family Eimeriidae that parasitize poultry, equines and ruminants, it causes ovine and bovine coccidiosis as well (Asif et al., 2008). Helminthes are parasites that cause parasitic gastroenteritis in sheep and cattles. The most significant genera of the order strongylida of nematodes is found particularly in tropical zones of the globe (Dagnachew et al., 2011). Trichuris sp., Bunostomum sp. and Cooperia sp. of nematodes have also been reported in cattle (Khan et al., 2013). Fasciola hepatica is a trematode parasite affecting sheep, goat and cattle. This parasite needs an intermediate host for transmission to its final host.

About 80% of young cattles have been reported by various researchers to be affected by nematode infestation (Asif et al., 2008). The incidence of endoparasitism in cattle population reported from various countries of the globe viz; Taiwan 7.9% (Fazlullah, 2016), Columbia 50.5% (Galan, 2005), Pakistan 89.74% (Hassan et al., 2011), Sri Lanka 11.56% (Gadahi et al., 2009), and Ghana 95.5% (Gupta et al., 2006). Similar findings for buffaloes and cattle population of India has been reported by various researchers (Jones and Raymond, 2001). Haripur is a vast district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province located at Hazara division with versatile livestock population. No research investigations for endoparasitism in large and small ruminants have been carried out so far. Keeping in view the above facts, current study was carried out for determination of various species of endoparasites affecting small and large ruminant population of District Haripur.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The present research investigation was performed at district Haripur that lies in Hazara division of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province and its geographical coordinates are 33°5850North, 72°561 East. In Haripur, summer season is long, sweltering, muggy, wet and clear while, the winters are cold and short with mild cloudy. Over the course of the year, the temperature typically varies from 40°F to 100°F and is rarely below 35°F or above 107°F (www.weatherspark.com).

 

Collection and examination of fecal samples

In district Haripur, 18 different dairy farms were selected. Approximately 5-10 grams fresh fecal samples were collected randomly from the 35 percent animal population present in these farms using previously labeled polyethylene bags. Total collected samples were (n=633). Samples were refrigerated and processed at Veterinary Research and Disease Investigation Laboratory Haripur. Qualitative testing of the samples was performed by general microscopic examination using different parasitological techniques.

The qualitative examination of faecal sample was done by direct microscopy using sedimentation and flotation techniques. Identification of the endoparasites was done by examination of the morphological characters of eggs and oocysts under two different magnifications of 10x and 40x.

Results and Discussion

The present research investigation was done to understand the prevalence of different species of helminths in large and small ruminants of district Haripur, Khyber PakhtunKhwa province of Pakistan. Feacal samples were randomly collected and processed in parasitology section, Veterinary Research Disease Investigation Laboratory Haripur.

Overall prevalence

A total 463 out of 633 feacal samples were found positive for different species of animals hence, overall was noted as 73 percent (Table 1).

 

Table 1: The overall prevalence for large and small ruminants.

No. of animals

Positive

Negative

Percentage

633

463

170

73.14%

 

Table 2: The specie wise prevalence of endoparasitic infestation.

Specie

Total samples

+ive samples

-ive samples

Overall prevalence (%)

Cattle

362

258

104

71.27

Buffalo

91

67

24

74.00

Goat

133

106

27

80.00

Sheep

47

32

15

68.08

Total

633

463

170

73.14

 

The infestation of endoparasites in different species of small and large ruminants was observed in current study and presented in Table 2. It was observed that prevalence was highest in goat (80%) followed by buffalo (74%), cattle (71.27%) and sheep (68.08%).

The detail of various species of endoparasites was observed in large and small ruminants reared in district Haripur are presented in Table 3. It was noted that Eimeria spp. was found 35.27%, 28.35%, Strongyle spp. 2.71%, 10.30 %, Ascarious spp. 12.10%, 56.71%, Fasciola spp., 5.30%, 8.90%, Trichuris spp., 3.87 %, 16.41% Monezia spp. 3.80%, 1.50% Schistoma bovis 8.91%, 2.98% while mixed species was noted as 13.00% and 19.00 % in cattle and buffalo respectively. The Eimeria spp. was highest (35.27%) followed Buffallo (28.35%) and trichuris spp. 16.41%. Similarly, Ascaris spp. was higher in buffallo (56.71%) followed by cattle (12.1%).

In small ruminants, Eimeria spp. 26.41%, 18.75%, Strongyle spp. 10.40%, 9.40%, Ascarious spp. 13.20%, 5.00%, Fasciola spp., 4.70%, 15.60%, Trichuris spp.,5.66%, 9.37%, Monezia spp. 7.50%, 12.50%, Schistoma bovis 1.00%, 6.25%, respectively for goat and sheep. It was noted that Eimeria spp. was highest in Goats (26.41%) followed by sheep (18.75%). The ascaris spp. was also higher in goats (13.2 %) followed by sheep (5%), While, Fasciola spp. was found higher (15.60%) in sheep than goats (4.70%). Mixed infestation in sheep was higher (8.10%) followed by goat (5.60%).

The prevalence of endoparasites with respect to age in large ruminants is elaborated in Table 4. It was noticed that the prevalence was higher in cattle above 3 year of age (83.00%) followed by 1-3 years (77.70%) and lowest in animals below 1 year of age (54.00%). Likewise, the prevalence in buffalo was higher above 3 years of age (86.00%), followed by age group 1-3 years (80.00%) and was lowest below 1 year of age (61.29%).

 

Table 3: Prevalence of various species of parasites in large and small ruminants.

Specie of animal

Prevalence (%)

Eimeria spp.

Strongyle spp.

Asc spp.

Fasciola spp.

Trichuris spp.

Monezia spp.

Schistoma bovis

Mixed

Cattle

35.27

2.71

12.10

5.30

3.87

3.80

8.91

13.00

Buffalo

28.35

10.30

56.71

8.90

16.41

1.50

2.98

19.00

Goat

26.41

10.40

13.20

4.70

5.66

7.50

1.00

5.60

Sheep

18.75

9.30

5.00

15.60

9.37

12.50

6.25

8.10

 

Table 4: Effect of age on prevalence of parasitism in large ruminants.

Specie

Age groups

Total samples

+ive samples (No’s)

Prevalence (%)

Cattle

<1yr

125

68

54.00

1-3yr

130

101

77.70

>3yr

107

89

83.00

Buffalo

<1yr

31

19

61.29

1-3yr

30

24

80.00

>3yr

30

24

86.00

 

Table 5: Effect of age on prevalence of parasitism in small ruminants.

Specie

Age Groups

Total samples

+ive samples (No’s)

Prevalence (%)

Goat

< 6 months

30

19

63.33

6 months -2 years

40

32

80.00

>2 years

63

55

87.30

Sheep

< 6 months

15

8

53.33

6 months- 2 years

10

8

80.00

>2 years

22

16

73.00

 

The prevalence of endoparasites in small ruminants (goat and sheep) is described in the Table 5. It was observed that the endoparasites infestation was higher in older goats above 2 years of age (87.30%) followed by intermediate age group viz; 6 months to 2 years of age (80.00%) and lowest in younger animals below 6 months of age (63.33%). While, the infestation of endoparasites was higher in sheep of intermediate age group (80.00%) followed by adult age group more than 2 years (73.00%) and lowest in lambs with age below 6 months (53.33%).

This research was conducted to study the presence of helminthic parasites in the animal population in district Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. These helminthic parasites are excessively present in the gastrointestinal region of animals and infection was almost 73% in small and large ruminants. High infestation of the endoparasites may be triggered by many contributory managemental factors like, rearing practices, feeding, watering resources, housing, general health care including deworming etc. The farmers of the study area are mainly dependent upon the natural grazing of their animals and common water pond for rain water reserve. There is no supplementation of any concentrate to animal feedings. As the animals grown up, there is high demand of energy and protein for the vital body processes and survival. However, lean animals have to search more for grazing. The grazing is more intensive, putting animals under more stress of feeding. Soil and water contamination by the animal feces supports the entry and proliferation of the endoparasites makes the animal to be victim. There is less awareness about regular deworming practices of their livestock. The above factors have been reflected by many other researchers like (Khan et al., 2021; Rafi et al., 2021). Poor housing, overcrowding and drainage from the animal barns make the situation worse. Feeding management and watering under this condition is also very problematic and contaminations of the feed with the ova of the parasites make the entry of the parasite into animal digestive system.

Similarly, the climatic conditions are more favorable for the development of endoparasites. Since the climatic conditions of the District Haripur remains warm starting from summer to November. The warm and humid conditions favor the survival of the endoparasitism. Their ova or eggs of the parasites remain viable in the soil and adhered with the grasses present on the grazing area, hence they are ingested by the livestock during grazing. In Haripur, the summers are long, sweltering, muggy, wet, and clear and the winters are short, cold, and partly cloudy. Over the course of the year, the temperature typically varies from 40°F to 100°F and is rarely below 35°F or above 107°F (www.weatherspark.com).

Gahahi et al. (2009), reported 63.50% of parasitic infestation in small and large ruminants from Islamabad Pakistan which is comparative to the present study viz; 73.14%. Similarly, Aliyu et al. (2020) reported the 82.2% of prevalence in ruminants which is supportive to the current study. The subsequent results of (Asif et al., 2008) also reported that in the Rawalpindi region, this number is reported to be almost 63.70%. The difference in these findings varies region vise depending on the farm management, the climatic situation of a particular area, and the geographical location of a particular region.

Several helminthic parasites are reported in these regions; mostly present species are Eimeria spp., Ascaris, Strongyloid, Fasciola spp., Trichuris spp., Monezia spp., and Schistosoma bovis, the bloodsucker parasite. The higher prevalence of these parasites is due to feeding styles like feeding on upper bushes to grazing on grasses, along with the use of these bushes, herbs, shrubs, and trees for specific mechanized crop production schemes by rain fed mechanism. So, increasing prevalence of ova and larvae in the pasture was also confirmed as researched by (Rahman and Ali, 2001).

The effect of age has significant effect on prevalence of endoparasites in small and large ruminants. In current study, the prevalence in cattle and buffalo observed in three age groups viz; <1yr, 1-3yr and >3yr. It was noticed that the prevalence was higher in cattle above 3 year of age (83.00%) followed by 1-3 years (77.70%) and lowest in animals below 1 year of age (54.00%). Likewise, the prevalence in buffalo was higher above 3 years of age (86.00%), followed by age group 1-3 years (80.00%) and was lowest below 1 year of age (61.29%). Khan et al. (2017) reported that the occurrence of endoparasites is higher in adult animals when compared to young animal which is supportive to the findings of current study. It was observed that the endoparasites infestation was higher in older goats above 2 years of age (87.30%) followed by intermediate age group viz; 6 months to 2 years of age (80.00%) and lowest in younger animals below 6 months of age (63.33%). While, the infestation of endoparasites was higher in sheep of intermediate age group (80.00%) followed by adult age group more than 2 years (73.00%) and lowest in lambs with age below 6 months (53.33%). Bikila et al. (2013) and Raza et al. (2014) reported the prevalence of endoparasites in goat and sheep and the results of their studies are in line with the current study. Similarly, Aliyu et. al. (2020) and Singh et al. (2017), reported that the prevalence of endoparasites was higher in more than 6 months age groups which support results of the current study. Moreover, (Urquhart et al., 1996; Sohail et al., 2017) also recorded infection prevalence worldwide. All of these studies are in line with the results of present study however, little difference may exist which might be due to the geographical and environmental differences of every region.

There are no best treatment practices to treat such parasitic infestation in this region. Mostly farmers are illiterate and quake practice exists at its peak. Although extension staff is responsible for the treatment of such animals. However, support of the diagnostic laboratories is not properly availed and only symptomatic treatment is given. Similarly, repetition of single antiparasitic drug that might be non- specific for the parasite affecting the animal and improper dosage for long time is creating the drug resistance issues in this region.

Conclusions and Recommendations

In current study it was concluded that occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites was higher in Goats followed by buffalo and cattle. Moreover, it was also observed that the animals above 6 months of age were more prone to be affected by endoparasites than younger animals.

It is recommended that proper managemental practices, strategic anthelmintic protocols as per regular faecal examination and training of farmers regarding husbandry practices should be implemented in the study area to boost the economy of the farmers.

Acknowledgement

Authors are grateful to both research organizations involved and livestock farmers of district Haripur.

Novelty Statement

It is first study in the area reflecting helminths infestation in three domesticated ruminant species i.e. bovine, ovine and caprine. It is sensitization for farmer’s community and a guideline for future investigations for parasitic control measures for these farmers.

Author’s Contribution

Ishtiaq Ahmed: Principal investigator who conducted the whole study.

Hamid Ullah: Project incharge.

Zubair Ali: Sample collection.

Muhammad Sohail: Sample analysis.

Yasir Amin: Provision of laboratory staff for general lab work.

Afrasyab: Data entry.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Abbas, M., L. Kumar, Saif-ul-Rehman, Mathan and A. Yousaf. 2021. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in buffalo and cow calves in rural areas of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res., 40(2): MS.ID.006437. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2021.40.006437

Aliyu, A.A., F.O. Ewah, J.I. Maikenti, S.O. Ayuba, O.P. Aimankhu, H.O. Ahmed, A. Haruna and A.M. Idris. 2020. Helminth parasites of goats and sheep at slaughter house in Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Fudma J. Sci., 4(2). https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2020-0402-154

Asif, M., S. Azeem, S. Asif and S. Nazir. 2008. Prevalence of Gastro intestinal Parasites of Sheep and Goats in and around Rawalpindi and Islamabad. Pak. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 1: 14-17.

Bikila, E., Y. Amede, W. Tigre, T. Feyera, B.D. Jimma and B.D. Jimma. 2013. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites of small ruminants in Gechi District, Southwest Ethiopia. Adv. Biol. Res., 7(5): 169-174.

Dagnachew, S., A. Amamute and W. Temesgen. 2011. Epidemiology of gastro intestinal helminthiasis of small ruminants in selected sites of North Gondarzone, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop. Vet. J., 15: 57-68. https://doi.org/10.4314/evj.v15i2.67694

Di-Cerbo, A.R., M.T. Manfredi, S. Zanzani and K. Stradiotto. 2010. Gastrointestinal infection in goat farm in Lombardy (Northern Italy): Analysis on community and spatial distribution of parasites. Small. Rumin. Res., 88: 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.12.017

Singh, E., P. Kaur, L.D. Singla and M.S. Bal. 2017. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasitism in small ruminants in western zone of Punjab, India. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.61-66

Fazlullah, 2016. Study on prevalence and control practices of gastro intestinal helminths of small ruminants in District Tharparkar. Thesis submitted to Dept. of vet. Parasitology, Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture Tandojam. pp. 1-79.

Gadahi, J.A., M.J. Arshed, Q. Ali, S.B. Javaid and S.I. Shah. 2009. Prevalence of gastro intestinal parasites of sheep and goat in and around Rawalpindi and Islamabad. Vet. World, 2: 51-53.

Galan, S., 2005. Biodiversity in goats. Small Rumin. Res., 60: 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.021

Gupta, G.C., B.P. Joshi and P. Rai. 2006. Some aspects of biochemical studies in calf
diseases ascaridiasis and scour. Indian. Vet. J., 53: 436–441.

Hassan. M.M., M.A. Hoque, M.A. Islam. S.A. Khan, K. Roy and Q. Banu. 2011. A prevalence of parasites in black Bengal goats in Chittagong, Bangladesh. Int. J. Livest. Prod., 2: 40–44.

Jones and Raymond. 2001. Sheep parasites and diseases. http://www.kt.iger.bbsrc.ac.uk/FACT%20 accessed on 25-03-2013.

Kashyap, Z., R.S. Sisodia and P.C. Shukla. 1997. Incidence of gastrointestinal parasites in cattle and buffaloes in Malwa region of Madhya Pradesh. Haryana Vet., 36: 34–36.

Khan, M.I., S.S.A. Shah, H. Khan, M. Irshad and A. Ullah. 2017. Determination of parasitic load in government cattle breeding and dairy farm, Charsadda, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 5(4): 174-178.

Khan, T., N. Nasreen, A.F. Shater, W. Khan, A. Khan, M. Kamal, R. Vinueza, R. Leon, A.R. Alhimaidi and O.A. Al-Jabr. 2021. Risk factor analysis for the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites found in large ruminants in Lower Dir Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 28(12): 7022-7026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.078

Khan, J.M., A. Hussain, A. Bukhsh and M. Shumaila. 2013. Identification of Ostertagia in goat with persistent diarrhea. Res. J. Vet. Pract., 1: 16–17.

Memon, N.A., 2021. Poultry country’s second-largest industry. Exclusive on Poultry.

Raza, M.A., Younas, M. and Schlecht, E., 2014. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths in pastoral sheep and goat flocks in the Cholistan desert of Pakistan. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 24(1): 127-134.

Rafi, U., R. Yasmeen, A.W. Qureshi, R. Bukhari and S.S. Bukhari. 2021. Prevalence of parasitic species in ruminants found in the vicinity of Lahore, Pakistan. Sci. Inquiry Rev., 5(4): Available from: https://doi.org/10.32350/sir.54.04

Rehman, N.U. and A. Ali. 2001. Month wise prevalence of gastro-intestinal trematodes, cestodes and nematodes infecting Damani sheep and goats in district D.I Khan. Pak. Vet. J., 21(2): 111-113.

Sohail, M., M. Nauman-ul-Islam, S.S.A. Shah, I.A. Shah, A. Raziq and M. Ilyas. 2017. Incidence of gastrointestinal parasites in Beetal goats at District Peshawar, Pakistan. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 5(5): 205-207.

Urquhart, G.M., J. Armour, J.L. Duncan, A.M. Dunn and F.W. Jennings. 1996. The laboratory diagnosis of parasitism. Vet. Parasitol., 2: 4–11.

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Sarhad Journal of Agriculture

March

Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, Vol.40, Iss. 1, Pages 01-262

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe