Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Parasitic Prevalence in Wild and Captive Birds Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Punjab, Pakistan

PJZ_57_1_351-363

Parasitic Prevalence in Wild and Captive Birds Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Punjab, Pakistan

Abdul Majeed Saim1, Arshad Javid1, Misbah Sarwar­2,

Muhammad Hafeez-ur-Rehman3 and Ali Hussain4*

1Department of Wildlife and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Outfall Road, Lahore, Pakistan

2Department of Wildlife and Forestry, Government of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

3Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Outfall Road, Lahore, Pakistan

4Institute of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Quaid-i-Azam Campus, Lahore, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

Haemosporidians are intracellular avian parasites and have serious impact on captive and wild birds worldwide. These avian parasites cause serious infections which ultimately cause decline in population of both wild and captive birds even can cause their extinction. Environmental changes especially variation in temperature and altitudinal gradient have great impact on distribution of ectoparasites and endoparasites in both captive and wild birds worldwide. These parasites affect bird population badly and cause massive mortality in captive birds. In the current study, conducted from April 2021 to December 2021, we investigated prevalence of seventeen endoparasites and ectoparasites, in eight captive and wild birds along altitudinal gradient. We collected ectoparasites externally using forceps and endoparasites by blood samples of total 960 sampled birds and examined them under microscope. Total 136 birds found having 37.8% parasitic prevalence. Raillietina echinobothrida, a Cestode parasite, showed maximum 78% prevalence recorded in Turkeys sampled from Khanewal (73%) situated at 128m from sea level, 68% at 39C in July 2021. Histomonas meleagridis, a protozoan parasite, showed minimum 8% in wild pigeon sampled from Rawalpindi situated at 508m above sea level, 6% at 20C in December 2021. Results concluded that raise in temperature also increases the parasitic prevalence but it is decreased with the increase in elevation above sea level. It was concluded that three Haemoparasite species, six nematodes species, one cestode species, three protozoan species and two trematodes species of parasites were observed and identified from fecal and blood samples.


Article Information

Received 13 February 2023

Revised 28 April 2023

Accepted 22 May 2023

Available online 01 September 2023

(early access)

Published 15 January 2025

Authors’ Contribution

AMS methodology. AJ supervision, data analysis. MS supervision, resources. MH supervision. AH supervision, critical review of manuscript.

Key words

Raillietina echinobothrida, Ectoparasites, Endoparasites, Coproparasitological examination, Prevalence

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20230213060247

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

0030-9923/2025/0001-0351 $ 9.00/00

Copyright 2025 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



INTRODUCTION

A large number of bird species, numbering over 10,000, migrate between different countries and continents (Barrowclough et al., 2016; Benskin et al., 2009). Wild birds are known to be a significant source of various diseases which can be transmitted to both humans and animals, including parasitic, mycotic, viral, fungal, and bacterial diseases (Mihaela and Marina, 2014). These diseases are also spread to aquatic environments (Zhao et al., 2017; Hird et al., 2015) and can lead to multiple abnormalities in infected humans, or cause the infected to become carriers (Lagerstrom and Hadly, 2021). Wild birds transmit these diseases to animals and humans beyond local outbreaks (Rahman et al., 2020). Pakistan has great variety of avian species and is blessed with more than 650 bird species, found in three zone from zoogeographical point of view such as Ethiopian, Oriental and Palearctic. Such distribution makes Pakistani avian unique (Chagas et al., 2017). Birds have worldwide distribution and they are considered to be 150 million years old vertebrates. Their diversity reveals ecological and morphological relationships and have maximum density of population in the Neotropics (Jenkins et al., 2013).

Raise in global temperature also increases geographical distribution of parasitic prevalence along altitude and latitude (Yousafzai et al., 2021). This increase in parasitic prevalence also increases infectious diseases which ultimately cause threatened species and extinction of species (Faraj and Al-Amery, 2020). Variation in temperature and rainfall affect parasitic prevalence and distribution worldwide (Zamora-Vilchis et al., 2012).

Coproparasitological surveys helped in analysis of parasitic prevalence of exotic and indigenous birds and animals until 1970s (Bunbury et al., 2008; Patra et al., 2021). Today, this types of study is common worldwide due to increase in diversity of birds and their vast geographical distribution. These birds carry variety of parasites and are a great threat for health of other animals and humans with which they interact (Dashe and Berhanu, 2020). Parasitic infections which have great significance in avian diseases, can affect health of wild birds even they can cause death of their host birds (Reed et al., 2003). In addition, endoparasites greatly affect birds health and cause serious infections especially in developing countries. Even these parasites can cause decline or extinction of their host population (Thompson, 2013). Therefore, parasitic infections are considered one of the major factors which cause a considerable loss to wildlife worldwide (Meister et al., 2023).

Wild and captive birds are usually infected by wide variety of parasites such as nematodes, cestodes, protozoans, trematodes and acanthocephalans. Such birds affect health of animals and humans when they interact with them (Otegbade and Morenikeji, 2014; Girisgin et al., 2017; Hasan et al., 2018). Moreover, captive birds such as cage birds are always under high risk of intestinal parasitic infections especially protozoan and nematodes infections which are more common. Parasitic prevalence in captive birds is directly proportional to sanitary conditions of cages of these birds and affect high density populations easily (Hasan et al., 2018). Consistence exposure of parasites cause serious issues such stress, prolonged confined housing, illness, injuries and adaptations to infected environment. Concentration of parasite eggs depends upon sanitary conditions and housing environment. Birds can take get exposure to these parasite eggs through contaminated water, food, litter and insects with which they interact (Niranjan et al., 2020). Commercial farmers consider captive facilities much better because higher density of birds increases transmission of parasitic prevalence in birds (Krystianiak et al., 2007).

Parasitic infections caused by major parasites infect both wild and captive birds and cause significant impact on bird physiology and metabolism (Niranjan et al., 2020). Parasitic infections of intestines in captive and wild birds caused by helminths and protozoans have significant health concern worldwide (Adhikari et al., 2022; Yousafzai et al., 2021). Haemosporida are major blood parasites that are transmitted through vectors and affect their hosts seriously (Kleinschmidt et al., 2022). Raillietina echinobothrida is of the most significant pathogenic tapeworms worldwide and important member of the class Cestoda that causes nodular tapeworm disease in a variety of birds (Al-Marsomy and Al-Hamadaani, 2016) and causes distinct intestinal nodules in their hosts (Kumar et al., 2019). Ascaridia species are the most common nematode parasites of birds. They include Ascaridia galli and Ascaridia columbae (Abdel Rahman et al., 2019). A. galli is a pathogenic roundworm of Nematoda phylum (Tarbiat, 2018) and is another common parasite of birds that causes a common worldwide disease, Ascaridiasis (Faraj and Al-Amery, 2020) in important bird species such as pigeons, turkey, duck, goose, and guinea fowl which is characterized by reduction in growth rate and egg production in birds ultimately causes major economic losses for poultry farmers (Al-Quraishi et al., 2020). A. galli is highly prevalent nematode that is common health problem (Yousaf et al., 2019). Ascaridia infection causes reduction in body and health condition, increase in feed conversion ratio, and depression of immune system leading to increase concurrent diseases in host bird species (Wongrak et al., 2014).

Parasites cause different diseases in both wild and captive birds such as flu, malaria and ornithosis. Examples of ectoparasites of birds are mites, flies and ticks while endoparasites are protozoans, nematodes, cestodes, acanthocephalans and trematodes (Yadav et al., 2021). Parasitic prevalence in birds depends upon different factors such as bird species, sex, age and ecological conditions (Valkiunas et al., 2005). Even there is significant difference in prevalence of blood parasites of closely related bird species. Juvenile birds are under greater risk of parasitic prevalence in comparison with adult birds. These blood parasities have affected reproductive rates, plumage, survival, coloration and community structure of their hosts (Fokidis et al., 2008). Prevalence, geographic distribution and host range expansion of pathogenic infections under the influence of varying landscapes and changing climate, are being studied for disease ecology (Parratt et al., 2016; Stephens et al., 2016). Yet impact of these pathogens on humans and other animals is not fully controlled (Stephens et al., 2016).

Prevalence of parasites affects conservation and health of captive and wildlife bird species while captive birds are at the risk of parasites attack more than wild birds (Ombugadu et al., 2018). Therefore, prevalence and identification of parasites both in wild and captive birds is very important to understand diagnosis, transmission, epizootiology, control and their pathogenicity. Parasitic prevalence is associated with subclinical infections which cause pathogenicity due to stress conditions. Regular examination of parasitic infections after appearance of specific symptoms are very important to control pathogenic prevalence (Papini et al., 2012). Birds kept in captivity are more susceptible to parasitic attack which affects their reproduction, growth and survival. This can lead towards extinction of bird species and can be obstacle in their conservation especially for those, at risk of being endangered (Adhikari et al., 2022; Mirza and Wasiq, 2007). Similarly, prevalence of blood parasites varies even among closely related bird species. Higher level of prevalence is documented in juvenile birds than adults. Community structure of their hosts, coloration, plumage, reproductive rates and survival of birds are all affected by blood parasites (Fokidis et al., 2008).

Vector borne haemosporidians causes infections in birds, reptiles, amphibians and mammals of the whole world, such as Plasmodium, transmitted by mosquitoes, spread malaria in birds. Similarly, Ceratopogonidae (midges) transmit haemoproteus and Simuliidae (black flies) cause transmission of leucocytozoon (Valkiunas et al., 2005). Such parasites, haemosporidian, affect health status and fitness of wide variety of bird species worldwide and cause massive mortality in their targeted bird species (Palinauskas et al., 2008; Dimitrov et al., 2015). Even some blood ectoparasites, such as Plasmodium, can cause extinction of native bird population at large scale (Atkinson and LaPointe, 2009) and other infectious effects such as less immunity and reduced reproductive ability (LaPointe et al., 2012; Asghar et al., 2015).

The aim of this study was to record parasitic prevalence of seventeen ectoparasites and endoparasites (blood parasites) in selected eight captive and wild avian species with respect to variation in temperature and elevation levels sampled from eight districts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study site and sampling

Total 480 captive birds such as peafowls (Pavo cristatus), ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus), turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo), pigeons (Columba livia domestica), and wild birds such as sparrows (Passer domesticus), crows (Corvus splendens), mynas (Acridotheres tristis) and wild pigeons (Columba livia) were collected from district Bahawalpur, Khanewal, Okara, Kasur, Lahore, Sargodha, Chakwal and Rawalpindi.

Ectoparasitic collection

One hundred and twenty mature birds (male and female) of each species i.e. captive bird species viz. P. cristatus, P. colchicus, M. gallopavo and C. livia domestica and wild birds i.e. P. domesticus, C. splendens, A. tristis and C. livia, were visually inspected and their whole body were fully examined. The parasites were collected using forceps and observed under stereo microscope and identified (Fokidis et al., 2008).

Fecal matter sampling

Fresh fecal droppings of selected experimental birds were collected and brought to the Department of Wildlife and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Lahore (31.044398, 73.874542) for corpological examination.

Ectoparasitic analysis

The samples were examined by direct fecal smear method, simple floatation and sedimentation techniques to detect parasitic oocytes and/or eggs. Later on, quantitative fecal sample examination, in term of oocytes per gram of feces were conducted using MacMaster’s egg counting technique. The oocytes were repeatedly examined for micrometery (Soulsby, 2005). The species identification was based on morphology of oocysts and eggs (Noor et al., 2021).

Blood sampling and endoparasite analysis

Blood samples were collected from 480 captive birds

and 480 wild birds, 120 samples of each bird species and 120 from each selected districts viz., Bahawalpur, Khanewal, Okara, Kasur, Lahore, Sargodha, Chakwal and Rawalpindi from April 2021 to December 2021. We captured birds using mist nets and cleaned the area, inserted the insulin needle into the brachial vein to take 50–100μl of whole blood into the syringe. Transferred the blood to an anticoagulant-treated vial (EDTA tube), labelled it with the bird’s identification number, and released the bird after it has fully recovered. These blood samples were immediately preserved into Queens’s buffer. These preserved blood samples were brought to laboratory of the Department of Wildlife and Ecology and viewed under microscope (Das et al., 2020).

Microscopic examination

Two blood smears of each host were prepared and fixed with methanol. Staining was performed using Giemsa and targeted parasites were screened. All smears were examined using stereo microscope at high magnification (x1000) (Valkiunas, 2004).

Parasitic prevalence

Prevalence of ectoparasites and endoparasites was checked with respect to bird species, temperature, sampling site and along altitude.

Data analysis

Data regarding parasites was collected in spreadsheets (Excel 2010; Microsoft, Washington) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA and chi-squared test of independence using SPSS version 21.0 software (IBM, USA).

RESULTS

Total 480 captive and 480 wild birds were screened, Helminth species of parasites observed were nematodes species such as Syngamus trachea, Allodopa suctoria, C. anatis, Heterakis gallinarum, Capillaria annulata and Ascaridia galli; trematodes species such as Prosthogonimus ovatus and Prosthogonimus macrorchis; cestode species Raillietina echinobothrida and protozoan parasitic species Giardia lamblia, Eimeria maxima and Histomonas meleagridis. Collected 120 fecal and 120 blood samples of peafowls, ring-necked pheasants, turkeys, captive pigeons, sparrows, crows, mynas and wild pigeons were subjected to analyze prevalence of endoparasites as results compared in Table I.

 

Table I. Fecal parasites of different captive and wild bird species, their life cycle, morphological characters, sampling organ/tissue, clinical diagnosis and control measure.

Parasites

Life cycle

Morphological

characters

Sampling organ/ tissue

Clinical diagnosis

Control measures

Trematodes

Prosthogonimus

ovatus

Indirect

Length 8-9mm; egg size 22-24 µm

Rectum and cloaca

Lay soft shelled eggs, milky discharge from cloaca

Control of secondary host

Prosthogonimus

macrorchis

Indirect

Length 7-9 mm; egg size 20µm

Intestine

Thriftiness, abdominal disorder and retarded growth

Keep away from moisture area and ensure sanitary practices

Protozoa

Giardia lamblia

Direct

Length 11-14μm; width 7-10μm in width. Cyst is dormant. Two forms Trophozoite is active form and

Intestinal tract

Weight loss, Diarrhoea is foul smelling, scratching and preening

Use cleaned drinking bottle. Use boiled and cooled water.

Eimeria maxima

Direct

Three developmental Stages; schizonts, gamonts and oocysts.

Small intestine

Bloody diarrhoea, Cause catarrhalic or haemorrhagic enteritis

Continuous medication is given through food and water. Sulfonamides is most common.

Histomonas

meleagridis

Direct

Two forms: A tissue-dwelling amoebic form and a caecal lumen

Liver and Caeca

Penetration from blood to liver causes serious infection

Dimetridazole is recommended to treat histomonosis.

Cestode

Raillietina echinobothrida

Indirect

Length 10-25cm; Egg size 74-93µm

Small intestine

Abdominal disorder and retarded growth

Control intermediate host

Nematodes

Capillaria annulata

Direct/ indirect

Male 15-25mm; Female 37-80mm; eggs -30×70µm

Esophagus and crop mucosa

Infect in lining between crop and esophagus

Strict hygiene of drinker and feeder; restrict their habitat of humid ares

Ascaridia galli

Indirect

Male 15-25mm; Female 37-80mm; eggs -30×70µm

Small intestine

Wings detachment, loss appetite, pale wattles and combs, enteritis and unthriftiness

Anthelmintics are used, avoid to moisture content and Pasteur rotation

Syngamus trachea

Direct/indirect

Female (5-20mm) are large in size than male (2-6mm); red coloured medium sized worms

Trachea and lungs

Respiratory disorders like sneezing and coughing, mucus block trachea causing severe mortality

Make ensure dried bird’s bed and change it regularly

Capillaria anatis

Direct/indirect

Males are 15 to 25 mm, females are 37 to 80 mm,and eggs are ~30x70 micrometer

Cecum

Diarrhoea

Anthelmintics are used

 

Table II. Blood parasites, their life cycle, morphological features, isolation organ/tissue, clinical diagnosis and control measures.

Parasite

Life cycle

Isolation cell/s

Morphological features

Clinical diagnosis

Control measures

Leucocytozoon

simond

Indirect

Erythrocyte and leucocyte

Oval, mature gametocyte 14-22 µm. Gametocyte is elongated when found in leukocytes and round when found in erythrocytes.

The animals are anorectic, listless, anaemic and ave a labored breathing. CNS symptoms.

Medication is used in combination form pyrimethamine (1ppm) and sulfadimethoxine (10ppm) in the feed treatment mostly is not effective.

Plasmodium

juxtanucleare

Indirect

Erythrocyte

Round oval or irregular in shape mature gametocyte is 15.5µm

Weight loss which causes death

Treatment is difficult in birds because duration of disease is 2 to 3 days.

Aegyptinella

pullorum

Indirect

Erythrocyte

Small 5-10µm, round to oval bodies.

Diarrhea, ruffled feather birds may become anorectic and droopy

Biosecurity measures should be taken to reduce the introduction

Table III. Ectoparasites, their prediction sites, morphology, life cycle and clinical diagnosis.

Parasite

Life cycle

Isolation site

Morphological features

Clinical diagnosis

Control measures

Dermanyssus

gallinae

Direct

Skin

The color of adult female mites is grey to deep red and size is 1 mm in length.

Anaemia, Reduction in egg production and itching effect may change bird behaviour.

Cracks and crevices should be filled in house should be clean and spray should be used.

Args persicus

Direct

Skin

Soft bodied tick. The size of female is 10 x 6 mm

Anaemia, weight loss, paralysis and depression.

Houses should be cleaned, walls, ceilings and cracks should be sprayed with carbaryl.

 

 

Table IV. Parasitic prevalence (%) with respect to temperature of each month.

Parasite

April

(26°C)

May

(28°C)

June

(31°C)

July

(39°C)

August

(37.7°C)

September

(29°C)

October

(27°C)

November

(25°C)

December

(20°C)

Prosthogonimus macrorchis

29

41

45

51

49

43

34

23

15

Prosthogonimus ovatus

18

23

28

34

31

25

20

15

9

Giardia lamblia

23

33

36

55

51

34

27

20

13

Eimeria maxima

17

25

27

43

38

26

19

13

8

Histomonas meleagridis

13

17

20

36

26

18

13

11

6

Raillietina echinobothrida

43

52

60

68

65

56

47

36

20

Capillaria annulata

31

40

47

57

54

44

34

27

17

Ascaridia galli

37

48

57

66

62

52

43

29

18

Syngamus trachea

34

43

48

56

51

46

38

30

16

Capillaria anatis

30

41

49

52

45

44

35

25

14

Allodapa suctoria

27

37

43

50

48

40

31

22

12

Heterakis gallinarum

18

23

28

36

31

26

21

14

10

Dermanyssus gallinae

24

31

38

45

43

33

27

18

12

Args persicus

21

32

38

42

40

36

25

17

10

Aegyptinella pullorum

19

30

37

48

42

34

23

13

9

Leucocytozoon simondi

17

27

33

41

36

30

20

12

8

Plasmodium juxtanucleare

28

33

38

49

46

36

29

22

11

 

Total 136 (37.8%) birds were found positive with presence of one or more parasites. Statistical analysis showed positive relationship between parasitic prevalence and temperature. Maximum parasitic prevalence was recorded in months of dry season. Total 17 endoparasite species (3 species from blood samples and 14 from fecal samples), were observed. Two ectoparasitic species such as Args persicus (fowl ticks) and Dermanyssus gallinae (mite), were inspected with 44% and 43% prevalence, respectively. Results recorded variation in parasitic prevalence of ectoparasites and endoparasites. Turkeys showed maximum prevalence of Raillietina echinobothrida (78%) followed by captive pigeons (72%), sparrows (66%), ring-necked pheasants (55%), peafowls 53%), mynas, crows (48%), and minimum prevalence was recorded in wild pigeon (H. meleagridis, 8%). Results of prevalence of ectoparasites and endoparasites are depicted in Tables IV-VI.

Parasites grow maximum at high temperature, that is the reason maximum prevalence was recorded at 39 oC in July 2021 in R. echinobothrida (68%) followed by A. galli (66%), C. annulata (57%) and Syngamus trachea (56%). Similarly, minimum parasitic prevalence was recorded at low temperature, 20 °C in December 2021 in Histomonas meleagridis (6%) followed by Eimeria maxima (8%), Leucocytozoon simondi (8%), Prosthogonimus ovatus (9%) and Aegyptinella pullorum (9%). Increase in elevation level causes decrease in parasitic prevalence that is why captive and wild birds distributed in lowland areas, had more parasitic prevalence in comparison of birds found in upland areas. Maximum prevalence was recorded at the lowest elevation range, 128m in captive and wild birds sampled from Khanewal which was 73% in Raillietina echinobothrida, 66% at 180m in Okara, 58% at 181m (Bahawalpur), 52% at 190m (Sargodha), 46% at 206m (Kasur), 38% at 217m (Lahore), 29% (A. galli) at 498m (Chakwal) and minimum prevalence was recorded at the highest range, 508m in birds sampled from Rawalpindi which was recorded as 8% (Histomonas meleagridis). Parasitic prevalence with respect to variation in temperature and elevation level is shown in Tables V and VI, respectively.

Results of parasitic prevalence of three blood parasites showed 44% prevalence of Leucocytozoon simond, 49% of Aegyptinella pullorum and 47% that of Plasmodium juxtanucleare in turkeys. Parasitic prevalence of six fecal parasites of nematodes was recorded as 51% (Allodapa suctoria), 36% (Heterakis gallinarum), 69% (Ascaridia galli), 59% (Capillaria annulata), 53% (Capillaria anatis) and 55% (Syngamus trachea). Similarly, parasitic prevalence of two fecal parasites of trematodes, was recorded as 58% (Prosthogonimus macrorchis) and 36% (Prosthogonimus ovatus). 78% prevalence was recorded for cestode species Raillietina echinobothrida. Corpological analysis of three protozoan species showed prevalence as 43% Eimeria maxima, 53% Giardia lamblia and 28% Histomonas meleagridis in Turkeys (Figs. I-III). Parasitic prevalence of two ectoparasites was recorded as 43% for Dermanyssus gallinae and 44% Args persicus as depicted in Table VI.

 

Table V. Parasitic prevalence (%) with respect to elevation of each district.

Parasite

Khanewal

(128m)

Okara

(180m)

Bahawalpur

(181m)

Sargodha

(190m)

Kasur

(206m)

Lahore

(217m)

Chakwal

(498m)

Rawalpindi

(508m)

Prosthogonimus macrorchis

61

55

44

38

27

20

15

11

Prosthogonimus ovatus

38

34

28

22

20

18

13

9

Giardia lamblia

48

45

42

35

28

24

19

14

Eimeria maxima

44

40

31

28

22

18

14

10

Histomonas meleagridis

41

37

29

25

23

18

16

8

Raillietina echinobothrida

73

66

58

52

46

38

28

17

Capillaria annulata

58

55

48

39

33

27

23

19

Ascaridia galli

70

63

54

50

43

38

29

22

Syngamus trachea

61

57

45

40

36

30

26

18

Capillaria anatis

63

53

49

43

34

31

25

21

Allodapa suctoria

56

51

48

42

37

28

21

18

Heterakis gallinarum

44

38

32

28

25

19

18

15

Dermanyssus gallinae

49

45

36

33

31

25

22

17

Args persicus

47

43

38

33

28

22

18

14

Aegyptinella pullorum

51

48

43

34

29

23

20

16

Leucocytozoon simondi

54

52

47

38

31

20

17

11

Plasmodium juxtanucleare

48

45

42

37

29

23

18

13

 

Table VI. Parasitic prevalence (%) with respect to each bird.

Parasite

Turkey

Captive pigeon

Sparrow

Ring-necked pheasant

Peafowl

Myna

Crow

Wild pigeon

Prosthogonimus macrorchis

58

53

48

45

43

40

32

27

Prosthogonimus ovatus

36

33

31

28

25

23

20

18

Giardia lamblia

53

45

39

37

35

33

30

26

Eimeria maxima

43

37

31

28

22

19

18

15

Histomonas meleagridis

28

26

21

18

16

13

11

8

Raillietina echinobothrida

78

72

66

55

53

48

45

41

Capillaria annulata

59

51

45

40

36

33

30

26

Ascaridia galli

69

63

55

51

48

43

36

27

Syngamus trachea

55

52

49

47

45

43

37

33

Capillaria anatis

53

49

45

43

40

37

35

32

Allodapa suctoria

51

47

45

43

38

33

28

26

Heterakis gallinarum

36

35

33

32

28

26

22

18

Dermanyssus gallinae

43

40

37

35

32

28

26

25

Args persicus

44

39

38

34

32

31

30

28

Aegyptinella pullorum

49

40

38

38

28

25

24

19

Leucocytozoon simond

44

43

42

41

34

23

18

13

Plasmodium juxtanucleare

47

40

38

36

35

33

29

27

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

Parasites greatly affect behavior and ecological interactions of birds (Abdu et al., 2022). Avian parasitic species cause decline in bird population and mass mortality in captive birds (Coker et al., 2017). This study indicates that out of 17 isolated parasites, Raillietina echinobothrida showed maximum prevalence (78%) in Turkeys sampled from Khanewal (128m) in the month of July at 39°C and minimum prevalence was showed by Histomonas meleagridis (8%) in wild pigeon sampled from Rawalpindi (508m) in the month of December at 20°C. Parasitic prevalence of R. echinobothrida was higher than recorded previously by (Noor et al., 2021) which was 72%. We recorded overall parasitic prevalence as 37.8% which was also higher than recorded in a previous study by (Zamora-Vilchis et al., 2012) who recorded 32.3%.

Avian parasites have widespread distribution and affected a wide variety of avian families ranging from acute to severe infections resulting fatal diseases in some cases (Meister et al., 2023). In current study, results showed strong association between temperature and parasitic prevalence in selected captive and wild birds. We found high prevalence in captive and wild birds distributed in lowland climatic zones (0-200m) especially in Khanewal (128m) where maximum prevalence, 73%, was recorded in Raillietina echinobothrida while we recorded low parasitic prevalence in wild and captive birds sampled from upland zones (200-600m) especially in Rawalpindi (508m) where maximum prevalence, 22%, was recorded in A. galli. This difference in high parasitic prevalence in lowland zones and upload zones was due to high temperature in lowland zone and low temperature in upland zones as temperature decreases with the increase in elevation. There is no any study performed to check impact of variation in temperature on parasitic prevalence, so we performed unique study in this context (Webb and Tracey, 1981; Yousafzai et al., 2021; Kleinschmidt et al., 2022). Parasitic prevalence are well documented on the basis of temporal and spatial dissimilarities. Intermediate hosts have different parasitic prevalence. There is a wide variety and vast geographic distribution of helminth species in Asia (Niranjan et al., 2020).

In current study, nine helminth species of parasites were observed. Eight of these nine, were nematodes species such as S. trachea, A. suctoria, C. anatis, H. gallinarum, C. annulata and A. galli while two trematodes species such as P. ovatus and one cestode species R. echinobothrida. Three parasites such as A. galli, C. annulata and H. gallinarum, are considered as major parasites in poultry industry which spread infectious diseases such as ascariodiosis and cestodiosis (Wongrak et al., 2014). Almost hundred helminth species are known so far isolated from captive and wild bird species. These parasitic species affect birds’ growth and egg laying badly. Nematodes parasitic species usually cause severe infections of gastrointestinal tract of birds (Al-Quraishi et al. 2020). Hasan et al. (2018) also isolated A. galli from turkeys and recorded its prevalence as 12.5% which was very low as compared to prevalence recorded in our study as 69%. They recorded 25% occurrence of E. maxima in turkeys while we recorded as 43% in our study. Ferrell et al. (2009) recorded A. galli (16%), E. tenella (18%) and E. acervulina (12%) in game birds such as turkey. Fecchio et al. (2017) reported 43% prevalence of A. galli and 12% of Eimeria spp. in love birds. However, Borecka et al. (2013) recorded A. galli (34%) and Eimeria spp. (23%) in Poland from game birds. Dubiec and Cichon (2001) found A. galli (42%) and H. gallinae (13%) in Saudi Arabia from love birds.

Parsani et al. (2001) recorded A. galli (28%), Eimeria spp. (17%), and H. gallinarum (63%) from captive birds in Gujrat, India. Dashe and Berhanu (2020) also detected 100% Eimeria spp. in December and 66.7% in April, 50% Ascaridia spp. in December and 33.3% in April. In another study by Van Hemert et al. (2019), they recorded prevalence of Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium as 53.8% and 9.7% respectively while we recorded 44% and 47% prevalence of Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium, respectively. According to current and previous studies, parasitic prevalence is distributed in wide variety of captive and wild bird species worldwide. But variation in their prevalence is due to their different climatic conditions, geographical distribution, sex, age, seasons, method of study, treatment and sample size (Kumar et al., 2019).

R. echinobothrida is one of the most significant helminth parasites that has worldwide prevalence (Li et al., 2009). Current study recorded maximum prevalence of R. echinobothrida in turkeys (78%) and captive pigeons (72%) sampled from Khanewal (128m) at 39 oC in July. R. echinobothrida was observed as a rounded headed, more than 25 cm long white color, wide and short neck that has 1-25 cm length (Mu et al., 2009). Dakhil and Al-Musaedi (2022) recorded 73.3% prevalence of R. echinobothrida in wild pigeons which was 1% higher than our recorded prevalence which may be due to different environmental conditions such as variation in temperature. Jasim et al. (2019) recorded 30.43% prevalence of R. echinobothrida in wild pigeon which was significantly lower than our recorded results.

In the current study, we recorded 69% and 63% prevalence of A. galli in infected turkeys and pigeons, respectively. While in a previous study, parasitological examination revealed 50% and 40% A. galli prevalence in infected and healthy turkeys, respectively. The morphological characterization revealed A. galli as semitransparent and yellowish white that was 0.062 mm long and 0.045 mm wide while A. galli egg was oval in shape (Tables II and III) (Mervat et al., 2020). Hamzah et al. (2020) recorded 12.5% gastrointestinal ascariasis caused by Ascaridia in healthy domestic pigeons. Abdel Rahman et al. (2019) reported 25% prevalence of A. galli in pigeons in Egypt. Yousaf et al. (2019) recorded 28.64% prevalence of A. galli which was very low in comparison with our findings. Salem et al. (2022) also recorded 63.1% prevalence of Ascaridia in pigeon comparatively lower than our recorded values. Faraj and Al-Amery (2020) have recorded very low prevalence 15.62% caused by Ascaridia in pigeons.

In the current study we recorded a significant infection rate caused by Capillaria nematode species which was 59% prevalence of C. annulata and 53% of C. anatis in turkeys while 51% and 49% in pigeons, respectively. In previous studies, Malik et al. (2020) recorded 73.3% prevalence of Capillaria in infected pigeons in Narowal (Punjab).

Conclusion

Current study identified three species of Haemoparasite, six nematodes, one cestode, three protozoan and two trematodes in fecal and blood samples of Columba livia domestica, Passer domesticus, Phasianus colchicus, Pavo cristatus, Acridotheres tristis and Corvus splendens. Proper medication, vaccination and sanitation of bird’s enclosures are recommended to avoid parasitic infection. Parasites have a significant impact on the health and immunity of both captive and wild birds. Bird’s sex, age, treatment, and season affect parasitic prevalence.

Funding

No funding was received for this research work.

IRB approval

The research work was approved by Departmental Board of Studies of Department of Wildlife and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Ethical statement

The research work was approved by ethical committee of University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Statement of conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. This work is neither published elsewhere nor under consideration for publication. All the authors approved its submission to this journal.

REFERENCES

Abdel Rahman, M.M.I.A., Tolba, H.M.N. and Abdel-Ghany, H.M., 2019. Ultrastructure, morphological differentiation and pathological changes of Ascaridia species in pigeons. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 7: 66-72. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2019/7.2.66.72

Abdu, S., Chimento, M., Alarcon-Nieto, G., Zuniga, D., Aplin, L.M., Farine, D.R. and Brandl, H.B., 2022. The performance of field sampling for parasite detection in a wild passerine. Ecol. Evol., 12: p.e9242. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9242

Adhikari, R.B., Ale, P.B., Dhakal, M.A. and Ghimire, T.R., 2022. Prevalence and diversity of intestinal parasites in household and temple pigeons (Columba livia) in central Nepal. Vet. Med. Sci., 8: 1528-1538. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.792

Al-Marsomy, W.A. and Al-Hamadaani, H.S., 2016. Association of cestoda Raillietina echinobothrida in rock pigeon Columba livia from Baghdad city of Iraq. Baghdad Sci. J., 13: 0463. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2016.13.3.0463

Al-Quraishi, M.A., Al-Musawi, H.S. and Al-Haboobi, Z.A.M., 2020. Pathological study of Ascaridia galli in poultry. Eur. Asian J. BioSci., 14: 3327-3329.

Asghar, M., Hasselquist, D., Hansson, B., Zehtindjiev, P., Westerdahl, H. and Bensch, S., 2015. Hidden costs of infection: Chronic malaria accelerates telomere degradation and senescence in wild birds. Science, 347: 436-438. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261121

Atkinson, C.T. and LaPointe, D.A., 2009. Introduced avian diseases, climate change, and the future of Hawaiian honeycreepers. J. Avian Med. Surg., 23: 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1647/2008-059.1

Barrowclough, G.F., Cracraft, J., Klicka, J. and Zink, R.M., 2016. How many kinds of birds are there and why does it matter? PLoS One, 11: p.e0166307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166307

Benskin, C.M.H., Wilson, K., Jones, K. and Hartley, I.R., 2009. Bacterial pathogens in wild birds: A review of the frequency and effects of infection. Biol. Rev., 84: 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00076.x

Borecka, J., Gawor, F. and Zieba, A., 2013. Survey of intestinal helminths in wild bird from the Tatra National Park, Southern Poland. Wild Anim. Parasitol., 59: 169-172.

Bunbury, N., Jones, C.G., Greenwood, A.G. and Bell, D.J., 2008. Epidemiology and conservation implications of Trichomonas gallinae infection in the endangered Mauritian pink pigeon. Biol. Conserv., 141: 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.008

Chagas, C.R.F., Valkiunas, G., de Oliveira Guimaraes, L., Monteiro, E.F., Guida, F.J.V., Simoes, R.F., Rodrigues, P.T., de Albuquerque Luna, E.J. and Kirchgatter, K., 2017. Diversity and distribution of avian malaria and related haemosporidian parasites in captive birds from a Brazilian megalopolis. Malaria J., 16: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1729-8

Coker, S.M., Hernandez, S.M., Kistler, W.M., Curry, S.E., Welch, C.N., Barron, H.W., Harsch, S., Murray, M.H. and Yabsley, M.J., 2017. Diversity and prevalence of hemoparasites of wading birds in southern Florida, USA. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasit. Wildl., 6: 220-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2017.08.003

Dakhil, H.G. and Al-Musaedi, A.I., 2022. Raillietina spp. infection birds in Missan/southern of Iraq. World Bull. Publ. Hlth., 9: 20-23.

Das, G., Klauser, S., Stehr, M., Tuchscherer, A. and Metges, C.C., 2020. Accuracy and precision of McMaster and mini-FLOTAC egg counting techniques using egg-spiked faeces of chickens and two different flotation fluids. Vet. Parasitol., 283: 109158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109158

Dashe, D. and Berhanu, A., 2020. Study on gastrointestinal parasitism of wild animals in captivity at the zoological garden of Haramaya University, Ethiopia. Open J. Vet. Med., 10: 173-184. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2020.109015

Dimitrov, D., Palinauskas, V., Iezhova, T.A., Bernotienė, R., Ilgunas, M., Bukauskaitė, D., Zehtindjiev, P., Ilieva, M., Shapoval, A.P., Bolshakov, C.V. and Markovets, M.Y., 2015. Plasmodium spp.: An experimental study on vertebrate host susceptibility to avian malaria. Exp. Parasitol., 148: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2014.11.005

Dubiec, A. and Cichon, M., 2001. Seasonal decline in health status of pet birds nestlings. Can. J. Zool., 79: 1829-1833. https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-151

Faraj, A.A. and Al-Amery, A.M., 2020. Microscopic and molecular diagnosis of Ascaridia spp. in domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in Baghdad city, Iraq. Iraqi J. agric. Sci., 51: 1220-1225. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v51i4.1101

Fecchio, R., Pinheiro, G., Felix, I.P., Faria, J.B., Pinho, G.A., Lacorte, E.M., Braga, I.P., Farias, A., Aleixo, V.V., Tkach, M.D., Collins, J.A. and Bell, J.D., 2017. Weckstein host community similarity and geography shape the diversity and distribution of intestinal parasites in Amazonian birds. Ecography, 17: 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03058

Ferrell, S.T., Pope, K.A. and Gardiner, C., 2009. Proventricular nematodiasis in game birds. J. Zool. Wildl. Med., 3: 543-550. https://doi.org/10.1638/2008-0208.1

Fokidis, H.B., Greiner, E.C. and Deviche, P., 2008. Interspecific variation in avian blood parasites and haematology associated with urbanization in a desert habitat. J. Avian Biol., 39: 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2008.04248.x

Girisgin, A.O., Birlik, S., Senlik, B. and Yildirimhan, H.S., 2017. Intestinal helminthes of the white strok (Ciconia ciconia Linnaeus 1758) from an inter-route site in Turkey. Acta Vet. Hung., 65: 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1556/004.2017.022

Hamzah, D.J., Al Kardhi, I.A., Al Saegh, H.A.H., Muhammed, A.H. and Ali, F.A.L., 2020. Molecular identification of Ascaridia columbae in the local healthy pigeon (Columba livia domestica, Gmelin, 1780) in Karbala province. Ind. J. Forensic Med. Toxicol., 14: 1008-1012.

Hasan, T., Mazumder, S., Hossan, M.M., Hossain, M.S., Begum, N. and Paul, P., 2018. Prevalence of parasitic infections of game birds in Dhaka city corporation, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Vet. Med., 16: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjvm.v16i1.37366

Hird, S.M., Sanchez, C., Carstens, B.C. and Brumfield, R.T., 2015. Comparative gut microbiota of 59 Neotropical bird species. Front. Microbiol., pp. 1403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01403

Jasim, H.J., Abdulzahra, I.A., Faraj, K.B. and Abed, S.M., 2019. Histopathological and molecular study of Raillietina echinobothrida of domestic and wild pigeons in Al-Muthanna Province. Ind. J. Publ. Hlth. Res. Dev., 10: 451-456. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.01044.1

Jenkins, C.N., Pimm, S.L. and Joppa, L.N., 2013. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302251110

Kleinschmidt, B., Dorsch, M., Heinanen, S., Morkunas, J., Schumm, Y.R., Zydelis, R. and Quillfeldt, P., 2022. Prevalence of haemosporidian parasites in an Arctic breeding seabird species, the red-throated diver (Gavia stellata). Microorganisms, 10: 2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112147

Krystianiak, S., Kontecka, H., Nowaczewski, A. and Rosinski, A., 2007. Laying characteristics of one and two-year old pheasants Phasianus colchicus L. Folia Biol., 55: 1-2. https://doi.org/10.3409/173491607780006362

Kumar, P., Vohra, S. and Singh, S., 2019. Raillietina echinobothrida infection in black crows (Corvus splendens) at Hisar (Haryana). Pharm. Innovat., 8: 657-659.

Lagerstrom, K.M. and Hadly, E.A., 2021. The under-investigated wild side of Escherichia coli: genetic diversity, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance in wild animals. Proc. R. Soc. B, 288: 20210399. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0399

LaPointe, D.A., Atkinson, C.T., Samuel, M.D., 2012. Ecology and conservation biology of avian malaria. Annls N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1249: 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06431.x

Li, M., Hai-yun L. and Bao-zuo Y., 2009. Comparative study on morphology and development of two species of Raillietina from chicken. Chin. J. Parasitol. Dis., 27: 232-236.

Malik, S., Baber, M.E., Ahmad, A., Abbas, H., Zahoor, S., Rizwan, H.M., Asif, A. and Nazir, N., 2020. Prevalence of Capillaria nematodes of pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in district Narowal, Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. J. Sci., 72: 25.

Meister, S.L., Wyss, F., Wenker, C., Hoby, S. and Basso, W.U., 2023. Avian haemosporidian parasites in captive and free-ranging, wild birds from zoological institutions in Switzerland: Molecular characterization and clinical importance. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl., 20: 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.12.005

Mervat, A.A., Samy S.M., Sanaa, M.S., Heba, A.M.E., Hend, M.M., 2020. An investigation of gastrointestinal tract parasites in some turkey farms with treatment trials. Egypt. Vet. Med. Soc. Parasitol. J., 16: 63-79. https://doi.org/10.21608/evmspj.2020.112693

Mihaela, N. and Marina, S., 2014. Wild birds as potential vectors for pathogen dissemination on migration routes in the Danube Delta Wetlands. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. appl. Sci., 3: 890-897.

Mirza, Z.B. and Wasiq, H., 2007. A field guide to birds of Pakistan. Published by WWF-Pakistan, Bookland Lahore. pp. 366.

Mu, L., Li H.Y. and Yan, B.Z., 2009. Comparative study on morphology and development of two species of Raillietina from chicken. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi. Chin. J. Parasitol. Parasitic Dis, 27: 232-236.

Niranjan, A.S., Singh, V.S., Vatsya, S., Singh, J.L. and Singh, R.K., 2020. Coprological survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in captive wildlife of Kanpur Zoological Park, India. J. Ent. Zool. Stud., 8: 589-596.

Noor, R., Javid, A., Hussain, A., Bukhari, S.M., Hussain, I., Suleman, S., Malik, S., Amin, F., Azam, S.M., Alia, K., Mustafa, G., Hussain, M., Ahmad, A. and Ali, W., 2021. Prevalence of parasites in selected captive bird species. Braz. J. Biol., 84: e254251. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.254251

Ombugadu, A., Echor, B., Jibril, A., Angbalaga, G., Lapang, M. and Micah, E., 2018. Impact of parasites in captive birds: A review. Curr. Res. Environ. Biodivers, 4: 1-2.

Otegbade, A. and Morenikeji, O., 2014. Gastrointestinal parasites of birds in zoological gardens in South-West Nigeria. Trop. Biomed., 31: 54-62.

Palinauskas, V., Valkiunas, G., Bolshakov, C.V. and Bensch, S., 2008. Plasmodium relictum (lineage P-SGS1): Effects on experimentally infected passerine birds. Exp. Parasitol., 120: 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2008.09.001

Papini, R., Girivetto, M., Marangi, M., Mancianti, F. and Giangaspero, A., 2012. Endoparasite infections in pet and zoo birds in Italy. Sci. World J., https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/253127

Parratt, S.R., Numminen, E. and Laine, A.L. 2016. Infectious disease dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Annls Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 47: 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032321

Parsani, H.R., Momin, R.R. and Bhuva, C.N., 2001. Parasitic infections among captive birds at Sakkarbagh zoo, Junagadh, Gujarat. Zoos Print J., 16: 462-464. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.16.4.462-4

Patra, G., Efimova, M.A., Sahara, A., Al-Abodi, H., Borthakur, S., Ghosh, S., Polley, S. and Debbarma, A., 2021. Prevalence of endoparasitic fauna of various species of birds in North-Eastern region of India. Biol. Rhythm. Res., 52: 882-894. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1608725

Rahman, M.T., Sobur, M.A., Islam, M.S., Ievy, S., Hossain, M.J., El-Zowalaty, M.E., Rahman, A.T. and Ashour, H.M., 2020. Zoonotic diseases: Etiology, impact, and control. Microorganisms, 8: 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091405

Reed, K.D., Meece, J.K., Henkel, J.S. and Shukla, S.K., 2003. Birds, migration and emerging Zoonoses: West Nile virus, Lyme disease, influenza A and enteropathogens. Clin. Med. Res., 1: 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.1.1.5

Salem, H.M., Khattab, M.S., Yehia, N., Abd El-Hack, M.E., El-Saadony, M.T., Alhimaidi, A.R., Swelum, A.A. and Attia, M.M., 2022. Morphological and molecular characterization of Ascaridia columbae in the domestic pigeon (Columba livia domestica) and the assessment of its immunological responses. Poult. Sci., 101: 101596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101596

Soulsby, E.J.L., 2005. Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals. Bailliere Tindal, ISBN 9780-8121-07807 (7th ed), London, UK. pp. 763-778.

Stephens, P.R., Altizer, S., Smith, K.F., Alonso Aguirre, A., Brown, J.H., Budischak, S.A. and Poulin, R., 2016. The macroecology of infectious diseases: A new perspective on global-scale drivers of pathogen distributions and impacts. Ecol. Lett., 19: 1159-1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12644

Tarbiat, B., 2018. Ascaridia galli in laying hens: Adaptation of a targeted treatment strategy with attention to anthelmintic resistance. Doctoral thesis, Swedish Universiy of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

Thompson, R.C.A., 2013. Parasite zoonoses and wildlife: One health, spillover and human activity. Int. J. Parasitol., 43: 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007

Valkiunas G., 2004. Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203643792

Valkiunas, G., Sehgal, R.N.M., Iezhova, T.A. and Smith, T.B., 2005. Further observations on the blood parasites of birds in Uganda. J. Wildl. Dis., 41: 580-587. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-41.3.580

Van Hemert, C., Meixell, B.W., Smith, M.M. and Handel, C.M., 2019. Prevalence and diversity of avian blood parasites in a resident northern passerine. Parasit. Vector, 12: 292. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3545-1

Webb, L.J. and Tracey, J.G., 1981. Australian rainforests: Patterns and change. In: Ecological biogeography in Australia (ed. A. Keast), Junk Publishers. The Hague, pp. 605-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8629-9_22

Wongrak, K., Daş, G., Moors, E., Sohnrey, B. and Gauly, M., 2014. Establishment of gastro-intestinal helminth infections in free-range chickens: A longitudinal on farm study. Berl. Munch Tierarztl. Wochenschr., 127: 305-13.

Yadav, S.K., Sarkar, S., Sarkar, S. and Siddiki, A.Z., 2021. Prevalence of endoparasites and ectoparasites of captive peafowl farm. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 9: 442-445. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.3.442.445

Yousaf, A., Tabasam, M.S., Memon, A., Rajput, N., Shahnawaz, R., Rajpar, S., Jamil, T. and Mushtaq, M., 2019. Prevalence of Ascaridia galli in different broiler poultry farms of Potohar region of Rawalpindi-Pakistan. J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res., 8: 71-73.

Yousafzai, G.J., Rafiq, N., Kamal, M., Khan, W., Yasmeen, G., Masood, Z., Usman, T., Ghani, N., Mohsin, M. and Hassan, H.U., 2021. Occurrence of cestodes and comparative efficacy of Typha angustata and sulphadimidine against cestodes in Columba livia domestica (Domestic Pigeon). Saudi J. biol. Sci., 28: pp.5925-5930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.058

Zamora-Vilchis, I., Williams, S.E. and Johnson, C.N., 2012. Environmental temperature affects prevalence of blood parasites of birds on an elevation gradient: Implications for disease in a warming climate. PLoS One, 7: e39208. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039208

Zhao, G., Zhou, L., Dong, Y., Cheng, Y. and Song, Y., 2017. The gut microbiome of hooded cranes (Grus monacha) wintering at Shengjin Lake, China. Microbiology Open, 6: e00447. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.447

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

December

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56, Iss. 6, pp. 2501-3000

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe