Parasitic Prevalence in Wild and Captive Birds Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Punjab, Pakistan
Parasitic Prevalence in Wild and Captive Birds Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Punjab, Pakistan
Abdul Majeed Saim1, Arshad Javid1, Misbah Sarwar2,
Muhammad Hafeez-ur-Rehman3 and Ali Hussain4*
1Department of Wildlife and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Outfall Road, Lahore, Pakistan
2Department of Wildlife and Forestry, Government of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
3Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Outfall Road, Lahore, Pakistan
4Institute of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Quaid-i-Azam Campus, Lahore, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
Haemosporidians are intracellular avian parasites and have serious impact on captive and wild birds worldwide. These avian parasites cause serious infections which ultimately cause decline in population of both wild and captive birds even can cause their extinction. Environmental changes especially variation in temperature and altitudinal gradient have great impact on distribution of ectoparasites and endoparasites in both captive and wild birds worldwide. These parasites affect bird population badly and cause massive mortality in captive birds. In the current study, conducted from April 2021 to December 2021, we investigated prevalence of seventeen endoparasites and ectoparasites, in eight captive and wild birds along altitudinal gradient. We collected ectoparasites externally using forceps and endoparasites by blood samples of total 960 sampled birds and examined them under microscope. Total 136 birds found having 37.8% parasitic prevalence. Raillietina echinobothrida, a Cestode parasite, showed maximum 78% prevalence recorded in Turkeys sampled from Khanewal (73%) situated at 128m from sea level, 68% at 39⁰C in July 2021. Histomonas meleagridis, a protozoan parasite, showed minimum 8% in wild pigeon sampled from Rawalpindi situated at 508m above sea level, 6% at 20⁰C in December 2021. Results concluded that raise in temperature also increases the parasitic prevalence but it is decreased with the increase in elevation above sea level. It was concluded that three Haemoparasite species, six nematodes species, one cestode species, three protozoan species and two trematodes species of parasites were observed and identified from fecal and blood samples.
Article Information
Received 13 February 2023
Revised 28 April 2023
Accepted 22 May 2023
Available online 01 September 2023
(early access)
Published 15 January 2025
Authors’ Contribution
AMS methodology. AJ supervision, data analysis. MS supervision, resources. MH supervision. AH supervision, critical review of manuscript.
Key words
Raillietina echinobothrida, Ectoparasites, Endoparasites, Coproparasitological examination, Prevalence
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20230213060247
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
0030-9923/2025/0001-0351 $ 9.00/00
Copyright 2025 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
A large number of bird species, numbering over 10,000, migrate between different countries and continents (Barrowclough et al., 2016; Benskin et al., 2009). Wild birds are known to be a significant source of various diseases which can be transmitted to both humans and animals, including parasitic, mycotic, viral, fungal, and bacterial diseases (Mihaela and Marina, 2014). These diseases are also spread to aquatic environments (Zhao et al., 2017; Hird et al., 2015) and can lead to multiple abnormalities in infected humans, or cause the infected to become carriers (Lagerstrom and Hadly, 2021). Wild birds transmit these diseases to animals and humans beyond local outbreaks (Rahman et al., 2020). Pakistan has great variety of avian species and is blessed with more than 650 bird species, found in three zone from zoogeographical point of view such as Ethiopian, Oriental and Palearctic. Such distribution makes Pakistani avian unique (Chagas et al., 2017). Birds have worldwide distribution and they are considered to be 150 million years old vertebrates. Their diversity reveals ecological and morphological relationships and have maximum density of population in the Neotropics (Jenkins et al., 2013).
Raise in global temperature also increases geographical distribution of parasitic prevalence along altitude and latitude (Yousafzai et al., 2021). This increase in parasitic prevalence also increases infectious diseases which ultimately cause threatened species and extinction of species (Faraj and Al-Amery, 2020). Variation in temperature and rainfall affect parasitic prevalence and distribution worldwide (Zamora-Vilchis et al., 2012).
Coproparasitological surveys helped in analysis of parasitic prevalence of exotic and indigenous birds and animals until 1970s (Bunbury et al., 2008; Patra et al., 2021). Today, this types of study is common worldwide due to increase in diversity of birds and their vast geographical distribution. These birds carry variety of parasites and are a great threat for health of other animals and humans with which they interact (Dashe and Berhanu, 2020). Parasitic infections which have great significance in avian diseases, can affect health of wild birds even they can cause death of their host birds (Reed et al., 2003). In addition, endoparasites greatly affect birds health and cause serious infections especially in developing countries. Even these parasites can cause decline or extinction of their host population (Thompson, 2013). Therefore, parasitic infections are considered one of the major factors which cause a considerable loss to wildlife worldwide (Meister et al., 2023).
Wild and captive birds are usually infected by wide variety of parasites such as nematodes, cestodes, protozoans, trematodes and acanthocephalans. Such birds affect health of animals and humans when they interact with them (Otegbade and Morenikeji, 2014; Girisgin et al., 2017; Hasan et al., 2018). Moreover, captive birds such as cage birds are always under high risk of intestinal parasitic infections especially protozoan and nematodes infections which are more common. Parasitic prevalence in captive birds is directly proportional to sanitary conditions of cages of these birds and affect high density populations easily (Hasan et al., 2018). Consistence exposure of parasites cause serious issues such stress, prolonged confined housing, illness, injuries and adaptations to infected environment. Concentration of parasite eggs depends upon sanitary conditions and housing environment. Birds can take get exposure to these parasite eggs through contaminated water, food, litter and insects with which they interact (Niranjan et al., 2020). Commercial farmers consider captive facilities much better because higher density of birds increases transmission of parasitic prevalence in birds (Krystianiak et al., 2007).
Parasitic infections caused by major parasites infect both wild and captive birds and cause significant impact on bird physiology and metabolism (Niranjan et al., 2020). Parasitic infections of intestines in captive and wild birds caused by helminths and protozoans have significant health concern worldwide (Adhikari et al., 2022; Yousafzai et al., 2021). Haemosporida are major blood parasites that are transmitted through vectors and affect their hosts seriously (Kleinschmidt et al., 2022). Raillietina echinobothrida is of the most significant pathogenic tapeworms worldwide and important member of the class Cestoda that causes nodular tapeworm disease in a variety of birds (Al-Marsomy and Al-Hamadaani, 2016) and causes distinct intestinal nodules in their hosts (Kumar et al., 2019). Ascaridia species are the most common nematode parasites of birds. They include Ascaridia galli and Ascaridia columbae (Abdel Rahman et al., 2019). A. galli is a pathogenic roundworm of Nematoda phylum (Tarbiat, 2018) and is another common parasite of birds that causes a common worldwide disease, Ascaridiasis (Faraj and Al-Amery, 2020) in important bird species such as pigeons, turkey, duck, goose, and guinea fowl which is characterized by reduction in growth rate and egg production in birds ultimately causes major economic losses for poultry farmers (Al-Quraishi et al., 2020). A. galli is highly prevalent nematode that is common health problem (Yousaf et al., 2019). Ascaridia infection causes reduction in body and health condition, increase in feed conversion ratio, and depression of immune system leading to increase concurrent diseases in host bird species (Wongrak et al., 2014).
Parasites cause different diseases in both wild and captive birds such as flu, malaria and ornithosis. Examples of ectoparasites of birds are mites, flies and ticks while endoparasites are protozoans, nematodes, cestodes, acanthocephalans and trematodes (Yadav et al., 2021). Parasitic prevalence in birds depends upon different factors such as bird species, sex, age and ecological conditions (Valkiunas et al., 2005). Even there is significant difference in prevalence of blood parasites of closely related bird species. Juvenile birds are under greater risk of parasitic prevalence in comparison with adult birds. These blood parasities have affected reproductive rates, plumage, survival, coloration and community structure of their hosts (Fokidis et al., 2008). Prevalence, geographic distribution and host range expansion of pathogenic infections under the influence of varying landscapes and changing climate, are being studied for disease ecology (Parratt et al., 2016; Stephens et al., 2016). Yet impact of these pathogens on humans and other animals is not fully controlled (Stephens et al., 2016).
Prevalence of parasites affects conservation and health of captive and wildlife bird species while captive birds are at the risk of parasites attack more than wild birds (Ombugadu et al., 2018). Therefore, prevalence and identification of parasites both in wild and captive birds is very important to understand diagnosis, transmission, epizootiology, control and their pathogenicity. Parasitic prevalence is associated with subclinical infections which cause pathogenicity due to stress conditions. Regular examination of parasitic infections after appearance of specific symptoms are very important to control pathogenic prevalence (Papini et al., 2012). Birds kept in captivity are more susceptible to parasitic attack which affects their reproduction, growth and survival. This can lead towards extinction of bird species and can be obstacle in their conservation especially for those, at risk of being endangered (Adhikari et al., 2022; Mirza and Wasiq, 2007). Similarly, prevalence of blood parasites varies even among closely related bird species. Higher level of prevalence is documented in juvenile birds than adults. Community structure of their hosts, coloration, plumage, reproductive rates and survival of birds are all affected by blood parasites (Fokidis et al., 2008).
Vector borne haemosporidians causes infections in birds, reptiles, amphibians and mammals of the whole world, such as Plasmodium, transmitted by mosquitoes, spread malaria in birds. Similarly, Ceratopogonidae (midges) transmit haemoproteus and Simuliidae (black flies) cause transmission of leucocytozoon (Valkiunas et al., 2005). Such parasites, haemosporidian, affect health status and fitness of wide variety of bird species worldwide and cause massive mortality in their targeted bird species (Palinauskas et al., 2008; Dimitrov et al., 2015). Even some blood ectoparasites, such as Plasmodium, can cause extinction of native bird population at large scale (Atkinson and LaPointe, 2009) and other infectious effects such as less immunity and reduced reproductive ability (LaPointe et al., 2012; Asghar et al., 2015).
The aim of this study was to record parasitic prevalence of seventeen ectoparasites and endoparasites (blood parasites) in selected eight captive and wild avian species with respect to variation in temperature and elevation levels sampled from eight districts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site and sampling
Total 480 captive birds such as peafowls (Pavo cristatus), ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus), turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo), pigeons (Columba livia domestica), and wild birds such as sparrows (Passer domesticus), crows (Corvus splendens), mynas (Acridotheres tristis) and wild pigeons (Columba livia) were collected from district Bahawalpur, Khanewal, Okara, Kasur, Lahore, Sargodha, Chakwal and Rawalpindi.
Ectoparasitic collection
One hundred and twenty mature birds (male and female) of each species i.e. captive bird species viz. P. cristatus, P. colchicus, M. gallopavo and C. livia domestica and wild birds i.e. P. domesticus, C. splendens, A. tristis and C. livia, were visually inspected and their whole body were fully examined. The parasites were collected using forceps and observed under stereo microscope and identified (Fokidis et al., 2008).
Fecal matter sampling
Fresh fecal droppings of selected experimental birds were collected and brought to the Department of Wildlife and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Lahore (31.044398, 73.874542) for corpological examination.
Ectoparasitic analysis
The samples were examined by direct fecal smear method, simple floatation and sedimentation techniques to detect parasitic oocytes and/or eggs. Later on, quantitative fecal sample examination, in term of oocytes per gram of feces were conducted using MacMaster’s egg counting technique. The oocytes were repeatedly examined for micrometery (Soulsby, 2005). The species identification was based on morphology of oocysts and eggs (Noor et al., 2021).
Blood sampling and endoparasite analysis
Blood samples were collected from 480 captive birds
and 480 wild birds, 120 samples of each bird species and 120 from each selected districts viz., Bahawalpur, Khanewal, Okara, Kasur, Lahore, Sargodha, Chakwal and Rawalpindi from April 2021 to December 2021. We captured birds using mist nets and cleaned the area, inserted the insulin needle into the brachial vein to take 50–100μl of whole blood into the syringe. Transferred the blood to an anticoagulant-treated vial (EDTA tube), labelled it with the bird’s identification number, and released the bird after it has fully recovered. These blood samples were immediately preserved into Queens’s buffer. These preserved blood samples were brought to laboratory of the Department of Wildlife and Ecology and viewed under microscope (Das et al., 2020).
Microscopic examination
Two blood smears of each host were prepared and fixed with methanol. Staining was performed using Giemsa and targeted parasites were screened. All smears were examined using stereo microscope at high magnification (x1000) (Valkiunas, 2004).
Parasitic prevalence
Prevalence of ectoparasites and endoparasites was checked with respect to bird species, temperature, sampling site and along altitude.
Data analysis
Data regarding parasites was collected in spreadsheets (Excel 2010; Microsoft, Washington) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA and chi-squared test of independence using SPSS version 21.0 software (IBM, USA).
RESULTS
Total 480 captive and 480 wild birds were screened, Helminth species of parasites observed were nematodes species such as Syngamus trachea, Allodopa suctoria, C. anatis, Heterakis gallinarum, Capillaria annulata and Ascaridia galli; trematodes species such as Prosthogonimus ovatus and Prosthogonimus macrorchis; cestode species Raillietina echinobothrida and protozoan parasitic species Giardia lamblia, Eimeria maxima and Histomonas meleagridis. Collected 120 fecal and 120 blood samples of peafowls, ring-necked pheasants, turkeys, captive pigeons, sparrows, crows, mynas and wild pigeons were subjected to analyze prevalence of endoparasites as results compared in Table I.
Table I. Fecal parasites of different captive and wild bird species, their life cycle, morphological characters, sampling organ/tissue, clinical diagnosis and control measure.
Parasites |
Life cycle |
Morphological characters |
Sampling organ/ tissue |
Clinical diagnosis |
Control measures |
Trematodes |
|||||
Prosthogonimus ovatus |
Indirect |
Length 8-9mm; egg size 22-24 µm |
Rectum and cloaca |
Lay soft shelled eggs, milky discharge from cloaca |
Control of secondary host |
Prosthogonimus macrorchis |
Indirect |
Length 7-9 mm; egg size 20µm |
Intestine |
Thriftiness, abdominal disorder and retarded growth |
Keep away from moisture area and ensure sanitary practices |
Protozoa |
|||||
Giardia lamblia |
Direct |
Length 11-14μm; width 7-10μm in width. Cyst is dormant. Two forms Trophozoite is active form and |
Intestinal tract |
Weight loss, Diarrhoea is foul smelling, scratching and preening |
Use cleaned drinking bottle. Use boiled and cooled water. |
Eimeria maxima |
Direct |
Three developmental Stages; schizonts, gamonts and oocysts. |
Small intestine |
Bloody diarrhoea, Cause catarrhalic or haemorrhagic enteritis |
Continuous medication is given through food and water. Sulfonamides is most common. |
Histomonas meleagridis |
Direct |
Two forms: A tissue-dwelling amoebic form and a caecal lumen |
Liver and Caeca |
Penetration from blood to liver causes serious infection |
Dimetridazole is recommended to treat histomonosis. |
Cestode |
|||||
Raillietina echinobothrida |
Indirect |
Length 10-25cm; Egg size 74-93µm |
Small intestine |
Abdominal disorder and retarded growth |
Control intermediate host |
Nematodes |
|||||
Capillaria annulata |
Direct/ indirect |
Male 15-25mm; Female 37-80mm; eggs -30×70µm |
Esophagus and crop mucosa |
Infect in lining between crop and esophagus |
Strict hygiene of drinker and feeder; restrict their habitat of humid ares |
Ascaridia galli |
Indirect |
Male 15-25mm; Female 37-80mm; eggs -30×70µm |
Small intestine |
Wings detachment, loss appetite, pale wattles and combs, enteritis and unthriftiness |
Anthelmintics are used, avoid to moisture content and Pasteur rotation |
Syngamus trachea |
Direct/indirect |
Female (5-20mm) are large in size than male (2-6mm); red coloured medium sized worms |
Trachea and lungs |
Respiratory disorders like sneezing and coughing, mucus block trachea causing severe mortality |
Make ensure dried bird’s bed and change it regularly |
Capillaria anatis |
Direct/indirect |
Males are 15 to 25 mm, females are 37 to 80 mm,and eggs are ~30x70 micrometer |
Cecum |
Diarrhoea |
Anthelmintics are used |
Table II. Blood parasites, their life cycle, morphological features, isolation organ/tissue, clinical diagnosis and control measures.
Parasite |
Life cycle |
Isolation cell/s |
Morphological features |
Clinical diagnosis |
Control measures |
Leucocytozoon simond |
Indirect |
Erythrocyte and leucocyte |
Oval, mature gametocyte 14-22 µm. Gametocyte is elongated when found in leukocytes and round when found in erythrocytes. |
The animals are anorectic, listless, anaemic and ave a labored breathing. CNS symptoms. |
Medication is used in combination form pyrimethamine (1ppm) and sulfadimethoxine (10ppm) in the feed treatment mostly is not effective. |
Plasmodium juxtanucleare |
Indirect |
Erythrocyte |
Round oval or irregular in shape mature gametocyte is 15.5µm |
Weight loss which causes death |
Treatment is difficult in birds because duration of disease is 2 to 3 days. |
Aegyptinella pullorum |
Indirect |
Erythrocyte |
Small 5-10µm, round to oval bodies. |
Diarrhea, ruffled feather birds may become anorectic and droopy |
Biosecurity measures should be taken to reduce the introduction |
Table III. Ectoparasites, their prediction sites, morphology, life cycle and clinical diagnosis.
Parasite |
Life cycle |
Isolation site |
Morphological features |
Clinical diagnosis |
Control measures |
Dermanyssus gallinae |
Direct |
Skin |
The color of adult female mites is grey to deep red and size is 1 mm in length. |
Anaemia, Reduction in egg production and itching effect may change bird behaviour. |
Cracks and crevices should be filled in house should be clean and spray should be used. |
Args persicus |
Direct |
Skin |
Soft bodied tick. The size of female is 10 x 6 mm |
Anaemia, weight loss, paralysis and depression. |
Houses should be cleaned, walls, ceilings and cracks should be sprayed with carbaryl. |
Table IV. Parasitic prevalence (%) with respect to temperature of each month.
Parasite |
April (26°C) |
May (28°C) |
June (31°C) |
July (39°C) |
August (37.7°C) |
September (29°C) |
October (27°C) |
November (25°C) |
December (20°C) |
Prosthogonimus macrorchis |
29 |
41 |
45 |
51 |
49 |
43 |
34 |
23 |
15 |
Prosthogonimus ovatus |
18 |
23 |
28 |
34 |
31 |
25 |
20 |
15 |
9 |
Giardia lamblia |
23 |
33 |
36 |
55 |
51 |
34 |
27 |
20 |
13 |
Eimeria maxima |
17 |
25 |
27 |
43 |
38 |
26 |
19 |
13 |
8 |
Histomonas meleagridis |
13 |
17 |
20 |
36 |
26 |
18 |
13 |
11 |
6 |
Raillietina echinobothrida |
43 |
52 |
60 |
68 |
65 |
56 |
47 |
36 |
20 |
Capillaria annulata |
31 |
40 |
47 |
57 |
54 |
44 |
34 |
27 |
17 |
Ascaridia galli |
37 |
48 |
57 |
66 |
62 |
52 |
43 |
29 |
18 |
Syngamus trachea |
34 |
43 |
48 |
56 |
51 |
46 |
38 |
30 |
16 |
Capillaria anatis |
30 |
41 |
49 |
52 |
45 |
44 |
35 |
25 |
14 |
Allodapa suctoria |
27 |
37 |
43 |
50 |
48 |
40 |
31 |
22 |
12 |
Heterakis gallinarum |
18 |
23 |
28 |
36 |
31 |
26 |
21 |
14 |
10 |
Dermanyssus gallinae |
24 |
31 |
38 |
45 |
43 |
33 |
27 |
18 |
12 |
Args persicus |
21 |
32 |
38 |
42 |
40 |
36 |
25 |
17 |
10 |
Aegyptinella pullorum |
19 |
30 |
37 |
48 |
42 |
34 |
23 |
13 |
9 |
Leucocytozoon simondi |
17 |
27 |
33 |
41 |
36 |
30 |
20 |
12 |
8 |
Plasmodium juxtanucleare |
28 |
33 |
38 |
49 |
46 |
36 |
29 |
22 |
11 |
Total 136 (37.8%) birds were found positive with presence of one or more parasites. Statistical analysis showed positive relationship between parasitic prevalence and temperature. Maximum parasitic prevalence was recorded in months of dry season. Total 17 endoparasite species (3 species from blood samples and 14 from fecal samples), were observed. Two ectoparasitic species such as Args persicus (fowl ticks) and Dermanyssus gallinae (mite), were inspected with 44% and 43% prevalence, respectively. Results recorded variation in parasitic prevalence of ectoparasites and endoparasites. Turkeys showed maximum prevalence of Raillietina echinobothrida (78%) followed by captive pigeons (72%), sparrows (66%), ring-necked pheasants (55%), peafowls 53%), mynas, crows (48%), and minimum prevalence was recorded in wild pigeon (H. meleagridis, 8%). Results of prevalence of ectoparasites and endoparasites are depicted in Tables IV-VI.
Parasites grow maximum at high temperature, that is the reason maximum prevalence was recorded at 39 oC in July 2021 in R. echinobothrida (68%) followed by A. galli (66%), C. annulata (57%) and Syngamus trachea (56%). Similarly, minimum parasitic prevalence was recorded at low temperature, 20 °C in December 2021 in Histomonas meleagridis (6%) followed by Eimeria maxima (8%), Leucocytozoon simondi (8%), Prosthogonimus ovatus (9%) and Aegyptinella pullorum (9%). Increase in elevation level causes decrease in parasitic prevalence that is why captive and wild birds distributed in lowland areas, had more parasitic prevalence in comparison of birds found in upland areas. Maximum prevalence was recorded at the lowest elevation range, 128m in captive and wild birds sampled from Khanewal which was 73% in Raillietina echinobothrida, 66% at 180m in Okara, 58% at 181m (Bahawalpur), 52% at 190m (Sargodha), 46% at 206m (Kasur), 38% at 217m (Lahore), 29% (A. galli) at 498m (Chakwal) and minimum prevalence was recorded at the highest range, 508m in birds sampled from Rawalpindi which was recorded as 8% (Histomonas meleagridis). Parasitic prevalence with respect to variation in temperature and elevation level is shown in Tables V and VI, respectively.
Results of parasitic prevalence of three blood parasites showed 44% prevalence of Leucocytozoon simond, 49% of Aegyptinella pullorum and 47% that of Plasmodium juxtanucleare in turkeys. Parasitic prevalence of six fecal parasites of nematodes was recorded as 51% (Allodapa suctoria), 36% (Heterakis gallinarum), 69% (Ascaridia galli), 59% (Capillaria annulata), 53% (Capillaria anatis) and 55% (Syngamus trachea). Similarly, parasitic prevalence of two fecal parasites of trematodes, was recorded as 58% (Prosthogonimus macrorchis) and 36% (Prosthogonimus ovatus). 78% prevalence was recorded for cestode species Raillietina echinobothrida. Corpological analysis of three protozoan species showed prevalence as 43% Eimeria maxima, 53% Giardia lamblia and 28% Histomonas meleagridis in Turkeys (Figs. I-III). Parasitic prevalence of two ectoparasites was recorded as 43% for Dermanyssus gallinae and 44% Args persicus as depicted in Table VI.
Table V. Parasitic prevalence (%) with respect to elevation of each district.
Parasite |
Khanewal (128m) |
Okara (180m) |
Bahawalpur (181m) |
Sargodha (190m) |
Kasur (206m) |
Lahore (217m) |
Chakwal (498m) |
Rawalpindi (508m) |
Prosthogonimus macrorchis |
61 |
55 |
44 |
38 |
27 |
20 |
15 |
11 |
Prosthogonimus ovatus |
38 |
34 |
28 |
22 |
20 |
18 |
13 |
9 |
Giardia lamblia |
48 |
45 |
42 |
35 |
28 |
24 |
19 |
14 |
Eimeria maxima |
44 |
40 |
31 |
28 |
22 |
18 |
14 |
10 |
Histomonas meleagridis |
41 |
37 |
29 |
25 |
23 |
18 |
16 |
8 |
Raillietina echinobothrida |
73 |
66 |
58 |
52 |
46 |
38 |
28 |
17 |
Capillaria annulata |
58 |
55 |
48 |
39 |
33 |
27 |
23 |
19 |
Ascaridia galli |
70 |
63 |
54 |
50 |
43 |
38 |
29 |
22 |
Syngamus trachea |
61 |
57 |
45 |
40 |
36 |
30 |
26 |
18 |
Capillaria anatis |
63 |
53 |
49 |
43 |
34 |
31 |
25 |
21 |
Allodapa suctoria |
56 |
51 |
48 |
42 |
37 |
28 |
21 |
18 |
Heterakis gallinarum |
44 |
38 |
32 |
28 |
25 |
19 |
18 |
15 |
Dermanyssus gallinae |
49 |
45 |
36 |
33 |
31 |
25 |
22 |
17 |
Args persicus |
47 |
43 |
38 |
33 |
28 |
22 |
18 |
14 |
Aegyptinella pullorum |
51 |
48 |
43 |
34 |
29 |
23 |
20 |
16 |
Leucocytozoon simondi |
54 |
52 |
47 |
38 |
31 |
20 |
17 |
11 |
Plasmodium juxtanucleare |
48 |
45 |
42 |
37 |
29 |
23 |
18 |
13 |
Table VI. Parasitic prevalence (%) with respect to each bird.
Parasite |
Turkey |
Captive pigeon |
Sparrow |
Ring-necked pheasant |
Peafowl |
Myna |
Crow |
Wild pigeon |
Prosthogonimus macrorchis |
58 |
53 |
48 |
45 |
43 |
40 |
32 |
27 |
Prosthogonimus ovatus |
36 |
33 |
31 |
28 |
25 |
23 |
20 |
18 |
Giardia lamblia |
53 |
45 |
39 |
37 |
35 |
33 |
30 |
26 |
Eimeria maxima |
43 |
37 |
31 |
28 |
22 |
19 |
18 |
15 |
Histomonas meleagridis |
28 |
26 |
21 |
18 |
16 |
13 |
11 |
8 |
Raillietina echinobothrida |
78 |
72 |
66 |
55 |
53 |
48 |
45 |
41 |
Capillaria annulata |
59 |
51 |
45 |
40 |
36 |
33 |
30 |
26 |
Ascaridia galli |
69 |
63 |
55 |
51 |
48 |
43 |
36 |
27 |
Syngamus trachea |
55 |
52 |
49 |
47 |
45 |
43 |
37 |
33 |
Capillaria anatis |
53 |
49 |
45 |
43 |
40 |
37 |
35 |
32 |
Allodapa suctoria |
51 |
47 |
45 |
43 |
38 |
33 |
28 |
26 |
Heterakis gallinarum |
36 |
35 |
33 |
32 |
28 |
26 |
22 |
18 |
Dermanyssus gallinae |
43 |
40 |
37 |
35 |
32 |
28 |
26 |
25 |
Args persicus |
44 |
39 |
38 |
34 |
32 |
31 |
30 |
28 |
Aegyptinella pullorum |
49 |
40 |
38 |
38 |
28 |
25 |
24 |
19 |
Leucocytozoon simond |
44 |
43 |
42 |
41 |
34 |
23 |
18 |
13 |
Plasmodium juxtanucleare |
47 |
40 |
38 |
36 |
35 |
33 |
29 |
27 |
DISCUSSION
Parasites greatly affect behavior and ecological interactions of birds (Abdu et al., 2022). Avian parasitic species cause decline in bird population and mass mortality in captive birds (Coker et al., 2017). This study indicates that out of 17 isolated parasites, Raillietina echinobothrida showed maximum prevalence (78%) in Turkeys sampled from Khanewal (128m) in the month of July at 39°C and minimum prevalence was showed by Histomonas meleagridis (8%) in wild pigeon sampled from Rawalpindi (508m) in the month of December at 20°C. Parasitic prevalence of R. echinobothrida was higher than recorded previously by (Noor et al., 2021) which was 72%. We recorded overall parasitic prevalence as 37.8% which was also higher than recorded in a previous study by (Zamora-Vilchis et al., 2012) who recorded 32.3%.
Avian parasites have widespread distribution and affected a wide variety of avian families ranging from acute to severe infections resulting fatal diseases in some cases (Meister et al., 2023). In current study, results showed strong association between temperature and parasitic prevalence in selected captive and wild birds. We found high prevalence in captive and wild birds distributed in lowland climatic zones (0-200m) especially in Khanewal (128m) where maximum prevalence, 73%, was recorded in Raillietina echinobothrida while we recorded low parasitic prevalence in wild and captive birds sampled from upland zones (200-600m) especially in Rawalpindi (508m) where maximum prevalence, 22%, was recorded in A. galli. This difference in high parasitic prevalence in lowland zones and upload zones was due to high temperature in lowland zone and low temperature in upland zones as temperature decreases with the increase in elevation. There is no any study performed to check impact of variation in temperature on parasitic prevalence, so we performed unique study in this context (Webb and Tracey, 1981; Yousafzai et al., 2021; Kleinschmidt et al., 2022). Parasitic prevalence are well documented on the basis of temporal and spatial dissimilarities. Intermediate hosts have different parasitic prevalence. There is a wide variety and vast geographic distribution of helminth species in Asia (Niranjan et al., 2020).
In current study, nine helminth species of parasites were observed. Eight of these nine, were nematodes species such as S. trachea, A. suctoria, C. anatis, H. gallinarum, C. annulata and A. galli while two trematodes species such as P. ovatus and one cestode species R. echinobothrida. Three parasites such as A. galli, C. annulata and H. gallinarum, are considered as major parasites in poultry industry which spread infectious diseases such as ascariodiosis and cestodiosis (Wongrak et al., 2014). Almost hundred helminth species are known so far isolated from captive and wild bird species. These parasitic species affect birds’ growth and egg laying badly. Nematodes parasitic species usually cause severe infections of gastrointestinal tract of birds (Al-Quraishi et al. 2020). Hasan et al. (2018) also isolated A. galli from turkeys and recorded its prevalence as 12.5% which was very low as compared to prevalence recorded in our study as 69%. They recorded 25% occurrence of E. maxima in turkeys while we recorded as 43% in our study. Ferrell et al. (2009) recorded A. galli (16%), E. tenella (18%) and E. acervulina (12%) in game birds such as turkey. Fecchio et al. (2017) reported 43% prevalence of A. galli and 12% of Eimeria spp. in love birds. However, Borecka et al. (2013) recorded A. galli (34%) and Eimeria spp. (23%) in Poland from game birds. Dubiec and Cichon (2001) found A. galli (42%) and H. gallinae (13%) in Saudi Arabia from love birds.
Parsani et al. (2001) recorded A. galli (28%), Eimeria spp. (17%), and H. gallinarum (63%) from captive birds in Gujrat, India. Dashe and Berhanu (2020) also detected 100% Eimeria spp. in December and 66.7% in April, 50% Ascaridia spp. in December and 33.3% in April. In another study by Van Hemert et al. (2019), they recorded prevalence of Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium as 53.8% and 9.7% respectively while we recorded 44% and 47% prevalence of Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium, respectively. According to current and previous studies, parasitic prevalence is distributed in wide variety of captive and wild bird species worldwide. But variation in their prevalence is due to their different climatic conditions, geographical distribution, sex, age, seasons, method of study, treatment and sample size (Kumar et al., 2019).
R. echinobothrida is one of the most significant helminth parasites that has worldwide prevalence (Li et al., 2009). Current study recorded maximum prevalence of R. echinobothrida in turkeys (78%) and captive pigeons (72%) sampled from Khanewal (128m) at 39 oC in July. R. echinobothrida was observed as a rounded headed, more than 25 cm long white color, wide and short neck that has 1-25 cm length (Mu et al., 2009). Dakhil and Al-Musaedi (2022) recorded 73.3% prevalence of R. echinobothrida in wild pigeons which was 1% higher than our recorded prevalence which may be due to different environmental conditions such as variation in temperature. Jasim et al. (2019) recorded 30.43% prevalence of R. echinobothrida in wild pigeon which was significantly lower than our recorded results.
In the current study, we recorded 69% and 63% prevalence of A. galli in infected turkeys and pigeons, respectively. While in a previous study, parasitological examination revealed 50% and 40% A. galli prevalence in infected and healthy turkeys, respectively. The morphological characterization revealed A. galli as semitransparent and yellowish white that was 0.062 mm long and 0.045 mm wide while A. galli egg was oval in shape (Tables II and III) (Mervat et al., 2020). Hamzah et al. (2020) recorded 12.5% gastrointestinal ascariasis caused by Ascaridia in healthy domestic pigeons. Abdel Rahman et al. (2019) reported 25% prevalence of A. galli in pigeons in Egypt. Yousaf et al. (2019) recorded 28.64% prevalence of A. galli which was very low in comparison with our findings. Salem et al. (2022) also recorded 63.1% prevalence of Ascaridia in pigeon comparatively lower than our recorded values. Faraj and Al-Amery (2020) have recorded very low prevalence 15.62% caused by Ascaridia in pigeons.
In the current study we recorded a significant infection rate caused by Capillaria nematode species which was 59% prevalence of C. annulata and 53% of C. anatis in turkeys while 51% and 49% in pigeons, respectively. In previous studies, Malik et al. (2020) recorded 73.3% prevalence of Capillaria in infected pigeons in Narowal (Punjab).
Conclusion
Current study identified three species of Haemoparasite, six nematodes, one cestode, three protozoan and two trematodes in fecal and blood samples of Columba livia domestica, Passer domesticus, Phasianus colchicus, Pavo cristatus, Acridotheres tristis and Corvus splendens. Proper medication, vaccination and sanitation of bird’s enclosures are recommended to avoid parasitic infection. Parasites have a significant impact on the health and immunity of both captive and wild birds. Bird’s sex, age, treatment, and season affect parasitic prevalence.
Funding
No funding was received for this research work.
IRB approval
The research work was approved by Departmental Board of Studies of Department of Wildlife and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ethical statement
The research work was approved by ethical committee of University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Statement of conflict of interest
All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. This work is neither published elsewhere nor under consideration for publication. All the authors approved its submission to this journal.
REFERENCES
Abdel Rahman, M.M.I.A., Tolba, H.M.N. and Abdel-Ghany, H.M., 2019. Ultrastructure, morphological differentiation and pathological changes of Ascaridia species in pigeons. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 7: 66-72. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2019/7.2.66.72
Abdu, S., Chimento, M., Alarcon-Nieto, G., Zuniga, D., Aplin, L.M., Farine, D.R. and Brandl, H.B., 2022. The performance of field sampling for parasite detection in a wild passerine. Ecol. Evol., 12: p.e9242. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9242
Adhikari, R.B., Ale, P.B., Dhakal, M.A. and Ghimire, T.R., 2022. Prevalence and diversity of intestinal parasites in household and temple pigeons (Columba livia) in central Nepal. Vet. Med. Sci., 8: 1528-1538. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.792
Al-Marsomy, W.A. and Al-Hamadaani, H.S., 2016. Association of cestoda Raillietina echinobothrida in rock pigeon Columba livia from Baghdad city of Iraq. Baghdad Sci. J., 13: 0463. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2016.13.3.0463
Al-Quraishi, M.A., Al-Musawi, H.S. and Al-Haboobi, Z.A.M., 2020. Pathological study of Ascaridia galli in poultry. Eur. Asian J. BioSci., 14: 3327-3329.
Asghar, M., Hasselquist, D., Hansson, B., Zehtindjiev, P., Westerdahl, H. and Bensch, S., 2015. Hidden costs of infection: Chronic malaria accelerates telomere degradation and senescence in wild birds. Science, 347: 436-438. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261121
Atkinson, C.T. and LaPointe, D.A., 2009. Introduced avian diseases, climate change, and the future of Hawaiian honeycreepers. J. Avian Med. Surg., 23: 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1647/2008-059.1
Barrowclough, G.F., Cracraft, J., Klicka, J. and Zink, R.M., 2016. How many kinds of birds are there and why does it matter? PLoS One, 11: p.e0166307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166307
Benskin, C.M.H., Wilson, K., Jones, K. and Hartley, I.R., 2009. Bacterial pathogens in wild birds: A review of the frequency and effects of infection. Biol. Rev., 84: 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00076.x
Borecka, J., Gawor, F. and Zieba, A., 2013. Survey of intestinal helminths in wild bird from the Tatra National Park, Southern Poland. Wild Anim. Parasitol., 59: 169-172.
Bunbury, N., Jones, C.G., Greenwood, A.G. and Bell, D.J., 2008. Epidemiology and conservation implications of Trichomonas gallinae infection in the endangered Mauritian pink pigeon. Biol. Conserv., 141: 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.008
Chagas, C.R.F., Valkiunas, G., de Oliveira Guimaraes, L., Monteiro, E.F., Guida, F.J.V., Simoes, R.F., Rodrigues, P.T., de Albuquerque Luna, E.J. and Kirchgatter, K., 2017. Diversity and distribution of avian malaria and related haemosporidian parasites in captive birds from a Brazilian megalopolis. Malaria J., 16: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1729-8
Coker, S.M., Hernandez, S.M., Kistler, W.M., Curry, S.E., Welch, C.N., Barron, H.W., Harsch, S., Murray, M.H. and Yabsley, M.J., 2017. Diversity and prevalence of hemoparasites of wading birds in southern Florida, USA. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasit. Wildl., 6: 220-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2017.08.003
Dakhil, H.G. and Al-Musaedi, A.I., 2022. Raillietina spp. infection birds in Missan/southern of Iraq. World Bull. Publ. Hlth., 9: 20-23.
Das, G., Klauser, S., Stehr, M., Tuchscherer, A. and Metges, C.C., 2020. Accuracy and precision of McMaster and mini-FLOTAC egg counting techniques using egg-spiked faeces of chickens and two different flotation fluids. Vet. Parasitol., 283: 109158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109158
Dashe, D. and Berhanu, A., 2020. Study on gastrointestinal parasitism of wild animals in captivity at the zoological garden of Haramaya University, Ethiopia. Open J. Vet. Med., 10: 173-184. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2020.109015
Dimitrov, D., Palinauskas, V., Iezhova, T.A., Bernotienė, R., Ilgunas, M., Bukauskaitė, D., Zehtindjiev, P., Ilieva, M., Shapoval, A.P., Bolshakov, C.V. and Markovets, M.Y., 2015. Plasmodium spp.: An experimental study on vertebrate host susceptibility to avian malaria. Exp. Parasitol., 148: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2014.11.005
Dubiec, A. and Cichon, M., 2001. Seasonal decline in health status of pet birds nestlings. Can. J. Zool., 79: 1829-1833. https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-151
Faraj, A.A. and Al-Amery, A.M., 2020. Microscopic and molecular diagnosis of Ascaridia spp. in domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in Baghdad city, Iraq. Iraqi J. agric. Sci., 51: 1220-1225. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v51i4.1101
Fecchio, R., Pinheiro, G., Felix, I.P., Faria, J.B., Pinho, G.A., Lacorte, E.M., Braga, I.P., Farias, A., Aleixo, V.V., Tkach, M.D., Collins, J.A. and Bell, J.D., 2017. Weckstein host community similarity and geography shape the diversity and distribution of intestinal parasites in Amazonian birds. Ecography, 17: 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03058
Ferrell, S.T., Pope, K.A. and Gardiner, C., 2009. Proventricular nematodiasis in game birds. J. Zool. Wildl. Med., 3: 543-550. https://doi.org/10.1638/2008-0208.1
Fokidis, H.B., Greiner, E.C. and Deviche, P., 2008. Interspecific variation in avian blood parasites and haematology associated with urbanization in a desert habitat. J. Avian Biol., 39: 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2008.04248.x
Girisgin, A.O., Birlik, S., Senlik, B. and Yildirimhan, H.S., 2017. Intestinal helminthes of the white strok (Ciconia ciconia Linnaeus 1758) from an inter-route site in Turkey. Acta Vet. Hung., 65: 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1556/004.2017.022
Hamzah, D.J., Al Kardhi, I.A., Al Saegh, H.A.H., Muhammed, A.H. and Ali, F.A.L., 2020. Molecular identification of Ascaridia columbae in the local healthy pigeon (Columba livia domestica, Gmelin, 1780) in Karbala province. Ind. J. Forensic Med. Toxicol., 14: 1008-1012.
Hasan, T., Mazumder, S., Hossan, M.M., Hossain, M.S., Begum, N. and Paul, P., 2018. Prevalence of parasitic infections of game birds in Dhaka city corporation, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Vet. Med., 16: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjvm.v16i1.37366
Hird, S.M., Sanchez, C., Carstens, B.C. and Brumfield, R.T., 2015. Comparative gut microbiota of 59 Neotropical bird species. Front. Microbiol., pp. 1403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01403
Jasim, H.J., Abdulzahra, I.A., Faraj, K.B. and Abed, S.M., 2019. Histopathological and molecular study of Raillietina echinobothrida of domestic and wild pigeons in Al-Muthanna Province. Ind. J. Publ. Hlth. Res. Dev., 10: 451-456. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.01044.1
Jenkins, C.N., Pimm, S.L. and Joppa, L.N., 2013. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302251110
Kleinschmidt, B., Dorsch, M., Heinanen, S., Morkunas, J., Schumm, Y.R., Zydelis, R. and Quillfeldt, P., 2022. Prevalence of haemosporidian parasites in an Arctic breeding seabird species, the red-throated diver (Gavia stellata). Microorganisms, 10: 2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112147
Krystianiak, S., Kontecka, H., Nowaczewski, A. and Rosinski, A., 2007. Laying characteristics of one and two-year old pheasants Phasianus colchicus L. Folia Biol., 55: 1-2. https://doi.org/10.3409/173491607780006362
Kumar, P., Vohra, S. and Singh, S., 2019. Raillietina echinobothrida infection in black crows (Corvus splendens) at Hisar (Haryana). Pharm. Innovat., 8: 657-659.
Lagerstrom, K.M. and Hadly, E.A., 2021. The under-investigated wild side of Escherichia coli: genetic diversity, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance in wild animals. Proc. R. Soc. B, 288: 20210399. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0399
LaPointe, D.A., Atkinson, C.T., Samuel, M.D., 2012. Ecology and conservation biology of avian malaria. Annls N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1249: 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06431.x
Li, M., Hai-yun L. and Bao-zuo Y., 2009. Comparative study on morphology and development of two species of Raillietina from chicken. Chin. J. Parasitol. Dis., 27: 232-236.
Malik, S., Baber, M.E., Ahmad, A., Abbas, H., Zahoor, S., Rizwan, H.M., Asif, A. and Nazir, N., 2020. Prevalence of Capillaria nematodes of pigeons (Columba livia domestica) in district Narowal, Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. J. Sci., 72: 25.
Meister, S.L., Wyss, F., Wenker, C., Hoby, S. and Basso, W.U., 2023. Avian haemosporidian parasites in captive and free-ranging, wild birds from zoological institutions in Switzerland: Molecular characterization and clinical importance. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl., 20: 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.12.005
Mervat, A.A., Samy S.M., Sanaa, M.S., Heba, A.M.E., Hend, M.M., 2020. An investigation of gastrointestinal tract parasites in some turkey farms with treatment trials. Egypt. Vet. Med. Soc. Parasitol. J., 16: 63-79. https://doi.org/10.21608/evmspj.2020.112693
Mihaela, N. and Marina, S., 2014. Wild birds as potential vectors for pathogen dissemination on migration routes in the Danube Delta Wetlands. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. appl. Sci., 3: 890-897.
Mirza, Z.B. and Wasiq, H., 2007. A field guide to birds of Pakistan. Published by WWF-Pakistan, Bookland Lahore. pp. 366.
Mu, L., Li H.Y. and Yan, B.Z., 2009. Comparative study on morphology and development of two species of Raillietina from chicken. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi. Chin. J. Parasitol. Parasitic Dis, 27: 232-236.
Niranjan, A.S., Singh, V.S., Vatsya, S., Singh, J.L. and Singh, R.K., 2020. Coprological survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in captive wildlife of Kanpur Zoological Park, India. J. Ent. Zool. Stud., 8: 589-596.
Noor, R., Javid, A., Hussain, A., Bukhari, S.M., Hussain, I., Suleman, S., Malik, S., Amin, F., Azam, S.M., Alia, K., Mustafa, G., Hussain, M., Ahmad, A. and Ali, W., 2021. Prevalence of parasites in selected captive bird species. Braz. J. Biol., 84: e254251. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.254251
Ombugadu, A., Echor, B., Jibril, A., Angbalaga, G., Lapang, M. and Micah, E., 2018. Impact of parasites in captive birds: A review. Curr. Res. Environ. Biodivers, 4: 1-2.
Otegbade, A. and Morenikeji, O., 2014. Gastrointestinal parasites of birds in zoological gardens in South-West Nigeria. Trop. Biomed., 31: 54-62.
Palinauskas, V., Valkiunas, G., Bolshakov, C.V. and Bensch, S., 2008. Plasmodium relictum (lineage P-SGS1): Effects on experimentally infected passerine birds. Exp. Parasitol., 120: 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2008.09.001
Papini, R., Girivetto, M., Marangi, M., Mancianti, F. and Giangaspero, A., 2012. Endoparasite infections in pet and zoo birds in Italy. Sci. World J., https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/253127
Parratt, S.R., Numminen, E. and Laine, A.L. 2016. Infectious disease dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Annls Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 47: 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032321
Parsani, H.R., Momin, R.R. and Bhuva, C.N., 2001. Parasitic infections among captive birds at Sakkarbagh zoo, Junagadh, Gujarat. Zoos Print J., 16: 462-464. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.16.4.462-4
Patra, G., Efimova, M.A., Sahara, A., Al-Abodi, H., Borthakur, S., Ghosh, S., Polley, S. and Debbarma, A., 2021. Prevalence of endoparasitic fauna of various species of birds in North-Eastern region of India. Biol. Rhythm. Res., 52: 882-894. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1608725
Rahman, M.T., Sobur, M.A., Islam, M.S., Ievy, S., Hossain, M.J., El-Zowalaty, M.E., Rahman, A.T. and Ashour, H.M., 2020. Zoonotic diseases: Etiology, impact, and control. Microorganisms, 8: 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091405
Reed, K.D., Meece, J.K., Henkel, J.S. and Shukla, S.K., 2003. Birds, migration and emerging Zoonoses: West Nile virus, Lyme disease, influenza A and enteropathogens. Clin. Med. Res., 1: 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.1.1.5
Salem, H.M., Khattab, M.S., Yehia, N., Abd El-Hack, M.E., El-Saadony, M.T., Alhimaidi, A.R., Swelum, A.A. and Attia, M.M., 2022. Morphological and molecular characterization of Ascaridia columbae in the domestic pigeon (Columba livia domestica) and the assessment of its immunological responses. Poult. Sci., 101: 101596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101596
Soulsby, E.J.L., 2005. Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals. Bailliere Tindal, ISBN 9780-8121-07807 (7th ed), London, UK. pp. 763-778.
Stephens, P.R., Altizer, S., Smith, K.F., Alonso Aguirre, A., Brown, J.H., Budischak, S.A. and Poulin, R., 2016. The macroecology of infectious diseases: A new perspective on global-scale drivers of pathogen distributions and impacts. Ecol. Lett., 19: 1159-1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12644
Tarbiat, B., 2018. Ascaridia galli in laying hens: Adaptation of a targeted treatment strategy with attention to anthelmintic resistance. Doctoral thesis, Swedish Universiy of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
Thompson, R.C.A., 2013. Parasite zoonoses and wildlife: One health, spillover and human activity. Int. J. Parasitol., 43: 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007
Valkiunas G., 2004. Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203643792
Valkiunas, G., Sehgal, R.N.M., Iezhova, T.A. and Smith, T.B., 2005. Further observations on the blood parasites of birds in Uganda. J. Wildl. Dis., 41: 580-587. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-41.3.580
Van Hemert, C., Meixell, B.W., Smith, M.M. and Handel, C.M., 2019. Prevalence and diversity of avian blood parasites in a resident northern passerine. Parasit. Vector, 12: 292. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3545-1
Webb, L.J. and Tracey, J.G., 1981. Australian rainforests: Patterns and change. In: Ecological biogeography in Australia (ed. A. Keast), Junk Publishers. The Hague, pp. 605-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8629-9_22
Wongrak, K., Daş, G., Moors, E., Sohnrey, B. and Gauly, M., 2014. Establishment of gastro-intestinal helminth infections in free-range chickens: A longitudinal on farm study. Berl. Munch Tierarztl. Wochenschr., 127: 305-13.
Yadav, S.K., Sarkar, S., Sarkar, S. and Siddiki, A.Z., 2021. Prevalence of endoparasites and ectoparasites of captive peafowl farm. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 9: 442-445. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.3.442.445
Yousaf, A., Tabasam, M.S., Memon, A., Rajput, N., Shahnawaz, R., Rajpar, S., Jamil, T. and Mushtaq, M., 2019. Prevalence of Ascaridia galli in different broiler poultry farms of Potohar region of Rawalpindi-Pakistan. J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res., 8: 71-73.
Yousafzai, G.J., Rafiq, N., Kamal, M., Khan, W., Yasmeen, G., Masood, Z., Usman, T., Ghani, N., Mohsin, M. and Hassan, H.U., 2021. Occurrence of cestodes and comparative efficacy of Typha angustata and sulphadimidine against cestodes in Columba livia domestica (Domestic Pigeon). Saudi J. biol. Sci., 28: pp.5925-5930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.058
Zamora-Vilchis, I., Williams, S.E. and Johnson, C.N., 2012. Environmental temperature affects prevalence of blood parasites of birds on an elevation gradient: Implications for disease in a warming climate. PLoS One, 7: e39208. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039208
Zhao, G., Zhou, L., Dong, Y., Cheng, Y. and Song, Y., 2017. The gut microbiome of hooded cranes (Grus monacha) wintering at Shengjin Lake, China. Microbiology Open, 6: e00447. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.447
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?