Morphological and Molecular Studies Nematode of the Species Parascaris equorum (Ascaridida)
Research Article
Morphological and Molecular Studies Nematode of the Species Parascaris equorum (Ascaridida)
Sardorbek N. Turgunov, Oybek O. Amirov*, Erkinjon B. Shakarboev, Abdurakhim E. Kuchboev
Institute of Zoology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 232b Bagishamol street, Tashkent, 100053, Uzbekistan.
Abstract | This article presents the results of research on the morphometric and molecular characteristics of the nematode Parascaris equorum collected from horses of the Fergana Valley, Uzbekistan. The total length of the male Parascaris equorum nematode was 175.5±3.86 mm, and that of the female was 293.7±4.83 mm. For molecular genetic studies from the collected samples, genomic DNA was extracted using the head of male of P. equorum species. QIAamp DNA Mini Kit reagents (QIAGEN, Germany) were used for genomic DNA isolation. According to the results of molecular genetic study, the nucleotide sequence belonging to the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of the ribosomal DNA of P. equorum species was analyzed, and it was found that 100% nucleotide similarity with P. equorum species (MH030605) and 95.85% similarity with the species P. univalens (MK209648) in the GenBank database (NCBI).
Keywords | Nematode, Horse, Helminth, Ribosomal DNA, ITS2, Parascaris equorum
Received | March 29, 2024; Accepted | May 02, 2024; Published | June 24, 2024
*Correspondence | Oybek O. Amirov, Institute of Zoology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 232b Bagishamol street, Tashkent, 100053, Uzbekistan; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Turgunov SN, Amirov OO, Shakarboev EB, Kuchboev AE (2024). Morphological and Molecular Studies Nematode of the Species Parascaris equorum (Ascaridida). Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 12(8):1450-1455.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.8.1450.1455
ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316
Copyright: 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Horses are susceptible to various diseases, and many invasive diseases are recorded in them. Helminths are parasites in various organs and tissues, causing serious damage to animal health. It also causes rapid fatigue, reduced work efficiency and endurance, and reduced growth (Kanijazov and Shakarboev, 2023), and development of young animals (Arkhipov et al., 2017; Skrjabin and Petrov, 1964).
Parascaris equorum is a nematode of the Parascaris (Yorke and Maplestone, 1926) genus that infects horses and has been found in Sudan, Egypt, Iran, Great Britain, Australia, China and other countries (Beasley et al., 2015; Chang et al., 2015; Easton et al., 2016; Ismail et al., 2016; Morsy et al., 2016; Tavassoli et al., 2016). Severely infected horses, especially foals, with P. equorum nematode cause enormous economic losses to livestock farms (Khasanova, 2013). Generally, parascariasis is caused by the nematode P. equorum, but Parascaris univalens has been reported as the dominant species affecting horses in the United States, Switzerland, and Sweden (Jabbar et al., 2014; Martin et al., 2018). Ingestion of infective eggs in the environment is the major route of transmission (Boyle and Houston, 2006).
Moreover, this species is one of the rare nematodes which induce absolute acquired immunity (Craig et al., 2007) and is a common and ubiquitous parasite that persists for many years in stables and on pasture in spite of good hygiene and anthelmintic control programs. These worms cause various degrees of damage, and they decrease the performance, production, and productivity in the animals mainly in the reduction of body weight or failure to gain weight or even increase the mortality in acute case (Boyle and Houston, 2006).
Parascaris equorum species is widespread in horses of the Ferghana Valley and was detected in 22 of 83 fully helminthologically examined horses. The intensity of invasion was 26.5%.
These identified species P. equorum and P. univalens are morphologically identical, and these species can be identified by molecular genetic analysis (Nielsen et al., 2014; Goday and Pimpinille, 1986). Morphological and molecular genetic analysis of P. equorum and P. univalens species in some literatures revealed that they belong to the same species (Gao et al., 2018).
Currently, molecular taxonomy methods are used to identify nematode species. By analyzing the nucleotides of the ITS region of the ribosomal DNA of nematodes, it is determined that the species are independent species (Ibrokhimov et al., 2023; Ikromov et al., 2023; Kuchboev et al., 2020; Dallas et al., 2000; Zarlenga et al., 1998).
The aim of this research work is the morphometric and molecular genetic analysis of the nematode Parascaris equorum, belonging to the genus Parascaris parasites of horses of the Fergana Valley of Uzbekistan.
Materials and Methods
Collection of genetic material
In order to carry out the research work, the nematode species P. equorum belonging to the genus Parascaris was collected from 22 horses from the regions of the Fergana Valley of the Republic of Uzbekistan (Figure 1).
Complete and incomplete helminthological dissection method of Skrjabin (1928) was used for collecting helminthological samples. From 2 to 52 samples were collected from the small intestines of horses. Before dissecting a dead horse, its body is examined, then the skin is removed and the subcutaneous tissues are examined, the abdomen and chest are opened in turn, and each organ is placed in separate containers (buckets). Small and large intestines are placed in some containers and water is poured. Then the intestines are thoroughly washed and the dung inside is put into a bowl.
The works of Ivashkin and Dvoinos (1984) were used for the morphological identification of the collected helminthological samples. Helminthology, comparative morphology, morphometry research methods (Demidov, 1987; Ivashkin et al., 1971) and Biostat 2007 programs were used during the work. NSZ-405 (HDCE-X5N) microscope was used for species identification.
Molecular genetic method
For molecular genetic studies from the collected samples, genomic DNA was extracted using the head of male of P. equorum species. QIAamp DNA Mini Kit reagents (QIAGEN, Germany) were used for genomic DNA isolation.
Primers that read nucleotides belonging to the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of ribosomal DNA, which are widely used in the molecular genetic identification of nematodes, were used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Subbotin et al., 2001). In the PCR, 16,1 μl of water, 2 μl of 10x PCR buffer, 0,4 μl of dNTP, 2 μl of each primer (TW81 (5′-GTTTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGC-3′) and reverse primer AB28 (5′-ATATGCTTAAGTTCAGCGGGT-3′), 0.4 μl of Taq polymerase were added to make a total mixture of 20 μl. PCR was performed in the following steps; at 98 ºC for 30 s, 40 cycles of 98 ºC for 10 s, 55 ºC for 30 s and 72 ºC for 30 s were followed by a final incubation at 72 ºC for 10 min (Kuchboev et Krücken, 2022).
The presence of DNA in PCR products was determined by electrophoresis on a 1,0 % agarose gel with a voltage of 100 V. DNA amplification and DNA extraction from the gel were performed using a reagent kit manufactured by Silex M (Moscow, Russia) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
DNA sequencing was performed using the ABI PRISM® BigDye™ Terminator v. 3.1 reagent kit, and reaction products were sequenced at GATC Biotech AG.
For the phylogenetic analysis of the species P. equorum and P. univalens belonging to the genus Parascaris, which are the object of research, in the course of our scientific research, the sample collected from the Fergana Valley region and the ITS gene sequence of 36 species belonging to this genus in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, GenBank) were used. The resulting sequences were compared using the T-Coffee multiple sequence alignment tools software tool (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/source.html). The data obtained as a result of the comparison were edited using the Geneious Prime 2024.0.3 (free version) program, and based on them, a maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was built using the IQ-TREE -1.6.12 program (Trifinopoulos et al., 2016). The phylogenetic tree was visualized using iTOL web software (https://itol.embl.de/login.cgi) (Letunic and Bork 2021). The species Ascaris suum (MH030604) was taken as an outgroup (Table 1).
Table 1: Species of the genus Parascaris from the Genbank database.
S. No. |
Nematode species |
ITS |
Country |
1. |
Parascaris equorum |
PP373800 |
Uzbekistan |
2. |
Parascaris equorum |
MH030605 |
USA |
3. |
Parascaris equorum |
JN617987 |
China |
4. |
Parascaris equorum |
OM876362 |
China |
5. |
Parascaris equorum |
OM876361 |
China |
6. |
Parascaris equorum |
OM876360 |
China |
7. |
Parascaris equorum |
MT579850 |
China |
8. |
Parascaris equorum |
MK209647 |
China |
9. |
Parascaris equorum |
MK209646 |
China |
10. |
Parascaris equorum |
MG882035 |
China |
11. |
Parascaris equorum |
MG882021 |
China |
12. |
Parascaris equorum |
MG882015 |
China |
13. |
Parascaris equorum |
MG882023 |
China |
14. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577207 |
Germany |
15. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577206 |
Germany |
16. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577195 |
Germany |
17. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577205 |
Germany |
18. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577204 |
Germany |
19. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577202 |
Germany |
20. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577186 |
Germany |
21. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577185 |
Germany |
22. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577190 |
Germany |
23. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577188 |
Germany |
24. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577199 |
Germany |
25. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577200 |
Germany |
26. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577198 |
Germany |
27. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577201 |
Germany |
28. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577192 |
Germany |
29. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577187 |
Germany |
30. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577196 |
Germany |
31. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577193 |
Germany |
32. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577191 |
Germany |
33. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577194 |
Germany |
34. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577197 |
Germany |
35. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577184 |
Germany |
36. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577189 |
Germany |
37. |
Parascaris univalens |
MZ577203 |
Germany |
Results and Discussion
Morphological and morphometric analysis
The total body length of Parascaris equorum for male nematodes is 152-197 (average 175.5±3.86) mm and the width of the body is 4.7-5.2 (average 4.93±0.045) mm. Spicules are uniform, 2.2-2.5 (average 2.4±0.035) mm long. The stoma is surrounded by three large lips, divided into one dorsal and two lateroventral lips. There is a difference in the structure of the lips of male and female nematodes, and the lips of females are larger.
The length of females was 274-320 (average 293.7±4.83) mm and width 7.6-8 (average 7.85±0.038) mm. The vulva is located in the second quarter of the body, 65-70 (average 67.3±0.44) mm from the tip of the head. Egg length 0.08-0.099 (average 0.089±0.002) mm, width 0.075-0.089 (average 0.079±0.001) mm (Table 2, Figure 2).
These morphometric data are close to the research conducted by Morsy et al. (2016), in which the length of male P. equorum nematode is 12-15 (average 14±2) cm, and the length of females is 13-18 (average 16±2) cm. However, the morphometric differences in the obtained results can be explained by the dependence of the nematodes on the ecological habitat of the host.
In order to identify these species at the species level, it is important to study the nucleotides of the ITS region of their ribosomal DNA.
Table 2: Morphometric dimensions of the nematode species Parascaris equorum, (mm), n=10.
Signs |
Lim |
(M±m) |
Male nematodes |
||
Body length |
152-197 |
175.5±3.86 |
Maximum body width |
4.7-5.2 |
4.93±0.045 |
Length from tip of tail to cloaca |
1.2-1.7 |
1.41±0.054 |
Esophagus length |
7.7-8.3 |
7.96±0.078 |
Esophagus width |
1.1-1.3 |
1.22±0.022 |
Spicule length |
2.2-2.5 |
2.4±0.035 |
Female nematodes |
||
Body length |
274-320 |
293.7±4.83 |
Maximum body width |
7, 6-8 |
7.85±0.038 |
The distance of the vulva from the tip of the head |
65-70 |
67.3±0.44 |
Esophagus length |
9.6-10.8 |
10.15±0.099 |
Esophagus width |
1.6-1.9 |
1.71±0.024 |
Egg length |
0.08-0.099 |
0.089±0.002 |
Egg width |
0.075-0.089 |
0.079±0.001 |
Molecular-genetic identification
According to the results of the conducted molecular genetic research, the nucleotide sequence of 770 pairs of bases belonging to the ITS region of the rDNA of the P. equorum species belonging to the genus Parascaris was extracted and compared with the nucleotide sequence of the P. equorum (MH030605) and P. univalens (MK209648) species of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) (Figure 3).
No differences were noted between the nucleotides of the P. equorum species and the P. equorum species (MH030605) in the GenBank database NCBI.
P. equorum species were compared with the nucleotides of P. univalens (MK209648) in the GenBank database. There are 32 nucleotide differences between the nucleotides of these P. equorum and P. univalens (MK209648) species, including the exchange of G-guanine in the P. equorum species and T-thymine in the P. univalens species in the 1, 2, 305 and 539 nucleotides, C-cytosine in the P. equorum species and T-thymine in the P. univalens species in the 3 nucleotide, G-guanine in the P. equorum species and C-cytosine in the P. univalens species in the 13 nucleotide, C-cytosine in the P. equorum species and A-adenine in the P. univalens species in the 25, 474 and 506 nucleotides, A-adenine in the P. equorum species and G-guanine in the P. univalens species in the 26, 208, 291, 507, 545, 679 and 719 nucleotides, G-guanine in the P. equorum species and A-adenine in the P. univalens species in the 40, 193, 247, 540, 603, 613, 643 and 661 nucleotides, T-thymine in the P. equorum species and S-cytosine in the P. univalens species in the 114, 323 and 583 nucleotides, A-adenine in the P. equorum species and T-thymine in the P. univalens species in the 179, 549 and 555 nucleotides, A-adenine in the P. equorum species and C-cytosine in the P. univalens species in the 640 nucleotide, T-thymine in the P. equorum species and A-adenine in the P. univalens species in the 648 nucleotide.
Importantly, all the Parascaris species clustered based on the concatenated amino acid sequences of 12 protein-coding genes. Interestingly, P. univalens (Switzerland and USA isolates) and P. equorum (Japan and China isolates) were not classified into the same branches. A similar result was reported previously for A. suum China isolate and A. suum USA isolate (Liu et al., 2012). The clustering of the four Parascaris species in a clade with high statistical support in the present study indicates that P. equorum and P. univalens are very closely related and may even be the same species.
Phylogenetic tree
A phylogenetic family tree was constructed based on the molecular-genetic analysis of the P. equorum species belonging to the Parascaris genus and the nucleotides belonging to the rDNA ITS region of the species obtained from the genebank database of this genus (Figure 4).
According to the family tree constructed on the basis of nucleotide sequences belonging to the ITS region, the species P. equorum and P. univalens belonging to the genus Parascaris are united into 2 separate monophyletic groups.
In the first group, the P.equorum species formed 75-100% bootstrap loading compared to the main joint, and formed 2 small groups within it. The genetic distance between representatives of the species is in the range of 0.000-0.004.
In the second group, the samples of P. univalens species also formed 2 subgroups, and these subgroups created a bootstrap loading of 75%. The genetic distance between representatives of the species is in the range of 0.000-0.008.
The nucleotide sequence obtained as a result of molecular genetic studies of Parascaris equorum was deposited in the GenBank database (NCBI) and the accession number (PP373800) was obtained.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Male and female individuals of the nematode P. equorum were studied morphometrically, and based on the obtained results, the nucleotide sequence of the rDNA ITS region of this species was analyzed, and nucleotides were compared with the species of P. univalens (MK209648) in the NCBI database. The difference between total nucleotides was found to be 4.15%. In this study, it was found that the Parascaris equorum species belonging to the Parascaris genus is distributed in the Fergana Valley.
Acknowledgements
The work was carried out within the framework of the program “Molecular identification of hoofed animals and their parasitic nematodes” implemented by the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Novelty Statement
Morphological and molecular genetic identification of Parascaris equorum nematode was carried out for the first time in Uzbekistan. It was found that the structure of the lips of female nematodes differs dramatically in size from that of males. According to the results of the molecular genetic research, the nucleotide sequence of 770 base pairs belonging to the ITS region of the rDNA of Parascaris equorum species was extracted and placed in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and received the accession number (PP373800).
Author’s Contribution
Materials were collected, morphologically studied and statistically analyzed by TS. Molecular analysis was done by OA and AK. The analysis of the collected materials and the preparation of the manuscript of the article were carried out by ES. The authors read and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Arkhipov IA, Limova YV, Sadov KM, Korogodina EV, Khalikov SS (2017). Anthelmintic effectiveness of new dosage forms of phenasal based on supramolecular, nanosized Drug Delivery System for anoplocephalidosis of horses. Russ. J. Parasitol., 2: 188-191.
Beasley A, Coleman G, Kotze AC (2015). Suspected ivermectin resistance in a south-east Queensland Parascaris equorum population. Austral. Vet. J., 93: 305–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12352
Boyle AG, Houston R (2006). Parasitic pneumonitis and treatment in horses. Clin. Tech. Equine Pract., 5: 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ctep.2006.03.018
Chang QC, Gao JF, Sheng ZF, Lou Y, Zeng X, Wang ChR (2015). Sequence variability in three mitochondrial genes among four roundworm species from wild animals in China. Mitochondrial DNA, 26: 75–78. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2013.823171
Craig TM, Diamond PL, Ferwerda NS, Thompson JA (2007). Evidence of ivermectin resistance by Parascaris equorum on a Texas horse farm. J. Equine Vet. Sci., 27(2): 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2006.12.002
Dallas JF, Irvine RJ, Halvorsen O (2000). DNA evidence that Ostertagia gruhneri and Ostertagia arctica (Nematoda: Ostertagiinae) in reindeer from Norway and Svalbard are conspecific. Int. J. Parasitol., 30(5): 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00028-X
Demidov NV (1987). Animal helminthiases: Handbook. M.: Agropromizdat, pp. 1-335.
Easton S, Pinchbeck GL, Tzelos T, Bartley DJ, Hotchkiss E, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB (2016). Investigating interactions between UK horse owners and prescribers of anthelmintics. Prevent. Vet. Med., 135: 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.10.017
Gao JF, Zhang XX, Wang XX, Li Q, Li Y, Xu WW, Gao Y, Wang CR (2018). According to mitochondrial DNA evidence, Parascaris equorum and Parascaris univalens may represent the same species. J. Helminthol., pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X18000330
Goday C, Pimpinelli S (1986). Cytological analysis of chromosomes in the two species Parascaris univalens and P. equorum. Chromosoma, 94: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293524
Hugot JP, Baujard P, Morand S (2001). Biodiversity in helminths and nematodes as a field of study: An overview. Nematology, 3: 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854101750413270
Ibrokhimov A, Kuchboev A, Amirov O, Kahorov B, Ayubov M (2023). Identification of nematodes of the genus Teladorsagia parasites of ruminants with the help of species-specific markers based on ITS2 rDNA. E3S Web Conf., 421: 4-14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342104014
Ikromov EE, Kuchboev AE, Ikromov EF, Sümer N, Yildirimhan HS, Amirov OO, Zhumabekova B (2023). Morphological and molecular characteristics of the species Cosmocerca commutata and C. ornata (Nematoda: Cosmocercidae) in Uzbekistan. Biodiversitas, 24(8): 4609-4616. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240843
Ismail AA, Ahmed NK, Bashar AE, Seri HI, El-Tigani A, El-Tigani-Asil, Abakar AD (2016). A survey of seasonal gastrointestinal parasitic infections in donkeys from a semiarid sub-Saharan region, Sudan. J Pathog., (1-2): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4602751
Ivashkin VM, Kontrimavichus VN, Nazarova NS (1971). Methods for collecting and studying helminths of terrestrial mammals. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 1-124.
Ivashkin VM, Dvoinos GM (1984). Determinant of helminths of horses. Kiev, Naukova. Dumka, pp. 1-163.
Jabbar A, Littlewood DTJ, Mohandas N, Briscoe AG, Foster PG, Muller F, Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Jex AR, Gasser RB (2014). The mitochondrial genome of Parascaris univalens-implications for a forgotten parasite. Parasit. Vectors, 7(1): 428. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-428
Kaniyazov AJ, Shakarboev EB (2023). Helminths of horses in Karakalpakstan: seasonal, spatial and age dynamics. Acta Biologica Sibirica. –Altay, 9: 539-548. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8317592
Khasanova RI (2013). Distribution of parascaridosis in horses under different storage technologies in the Eastern Caucasus. Russ. J. Parasitol., 4: 59-61.
Kuchboev A, Sobirova K, Karimova R, Amirov O, Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Krucken J (2020). Molecular analysis of polymorphic species of the genus Marshallagia (Nematoda: Ostertagiinae). Parasit. Vectors, 13(1): 411. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04265-1
Kuchboev AE, Krücken J (2022). Prevalence, infection intensity and molecular diagnosis of mixed infections with Metastrongylus spp. (Metastrongylidae) in wild boars in Uzbekistan. Pathogens, 11(11): 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111316
Letunic I, Bork P (2021). Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucl. Acids Res., 49(1): 293-296. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab301
Lichtenfels JR, Hoberg EP, Zarlenga DS (1997). Systematics of gastrointestinal nematodes of domestic ruminants: Advances between 1992 and 1995 and proposals for future research. Vet. Parasitol., 72: 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00099-X
Limova YV, Sadov KM, Korogodina EV, Arkhipov IA, Khalikov SS (2017). Anthelmintic effectiveness of new dosage forms of phenasal based on supramolecular, nanosized drug delivery system for anoplocephalidosis of horses. Russ. J. Parasitol., 2(40): 188-191.
Liu GH, Wu ChY, Song HQ, Wei ShJ, Xu MJ, Lin RQ, Zhao GH, Huang SY, Zhu XQ (2012). Comparative analyses of the complete mitochondrial genomes of Ascaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum from humans and pigs. Gene, 492: 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2011.10.043
Martin F, Hoglund J, Bergstrom TF, Lindsjö OK, Tydén E (2018). Resistance to pyrantel embonate and efficacy of fenbendazole in Parascaris univalens on Swedish stud farms. Vet. Parasitol., 264: 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.11.003
Morsy K, Bashtar AR, Quraishy S, Adel S (2016). Description of two equine nematodes, Parascaris equorum Goeze 1782 and Habronema microstoma Schneider 1866 from the domestic horse Equus ferus caballus (Family: Equidae) in Egypt. Parasitol. Res., 115: 4299–4306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5212-1
Nielsen MK, Wang J, Davis R, Bellaw JL. Lyons ET, Lear TL, Goday C (2014). Parascaris univalens, a victim of large-scale misidentification? Parasitol. Res., 113: 4485-4490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4135-y
Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD (2007). Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs and Goats. 10th Edition, Elsevier Saunders, London, pp. 1-2065.
Skrjabin KI (1928). Methods of complete helminthological dissection of vertebrates, including humans. 1st Moscow State University, Leningrad, pp. 1–45.
Skrjabin KI, Petrov AM (1964). Fundamentals of veterinary helminthology. Moscow: Kolos, pp. 1-528.
Subbotin SA, Vierstraete A, De Ley P, Rowe J, Waeyenberge L, Moens M, Vanfleteren JR (2001). Phylogenetic relationships within the cyst-forming nematodes (Nematoda, Heteroderidae) based on analysis of sequences from the ITS regions of ribosomal DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 21: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.0998
Tavassoli M, Yamchi JA, Hajipour N (2016). A survey on the prevalence of strongyles species in working donkeys in North-West of Iran. J. Parasit. Dis., 40: 1210–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-015-0651-7
Trifinopoulos J, , , 2016) W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucl. Acids Res., 44(1): 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256
Zarlenga DS, Hoberg EP, Stringfelow F, Lichtenfels JR (1998). Comparison of two polymorphic species of Ostertagia and philogenetic relationships within the Ostertagiinae (Nematoda:Trichostrongyloidea) inferred from ribosomal DNA repeat and mitochondrial DNA sequences. J. Parasitol., 84(4): 806–812. https://doi.org/10.2307/3284592
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?