Mass Rearing of Spodoptera litura using a Semi-Synthetic Diet Based on Wheat Germ and Tomato Paste
Mass Rearing of Spodoptera litura using a Semi-Synthetic Diet Based on Wheat Germ and Tomato Paste
Sumaria Maqsood1*, Muhammad Ali 2, Amna Shoaib3, Shahbaz Ahmad2 and Noor-ul-Ain2
1Department of Environmental Sciences, Kohsar University, Muree, Pakistan
2Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
3Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
ABSTRACT
Spodoptera litura (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is the threatening pests of many plants including tomatoes. In vitro, mass-rearing of S. litura is essential to attain a large number of insects with good quality for bio-ecological studies and biological control programs. In the current study, a modified diet was formulated and assessed against two diets used for mass rearing of S. litura, and tomato fruits were taken as a natural diet. Results revealed that development attributes based on mass rearing of S. litura on the modified diet (wheat germ + tomato paste) significantly reduced the larval and pupal developmental duration by 30%, while, considerably enhancing eclosion rate, pupation survival rate, and the number of eggs by 20-30% along with the 40-50% reduction in the pupal and larvae mortality rate as compared to the tomato paste diet and chickpea diet. The rearing expenses for 200 larvae on the modified diet (674/Rs) were 2.5 folds less than the expenses for rearing the same number of larvae on chickpea based diet (1749/Rs.) and almost equal to the tomato paste-based diet (669/Rs.). Therefore, a modified diet based on wheat germ and tomato paste is suitable for mass rearing of S. litura for six generations for laboratory and field experimentation.
Article Information
Received 11 August 2022
Revised 25 September 2022
Accepted 14 October 2022
Available online 09 November 2022
(early access)
Published 19 December 2022
Authors’ Contribution
SM planned experiments and supervised research. MA supervised research. AS analyzed data statistically and wrote the manuscript. SA edited manuscript. NA performed experiments.
Key words
Spodoptera litura, tomato, synthetic diet
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20220118030158
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
0030-9923/2023/0002-601 $ 9.00/0
Copyright 2023 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
Fall armyworm also known as the common cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Hübner), is a highly mobile, polyphagous, sporadic, and destructive Lepidopterans pest of around 389 plant species worldwide such as cotton, rice, corn, soybean, groundnut, vegetables, etc. (Khan et al., 2020). Larvae are primarily leaf feeders and can cause complete defoliation (Yinghua et al., 2017), and may cause loss to the crops (Dhir et al., 1992). In the last few years, it has become an emerging pest of cotton and vegetable crops in Pakistan (Naeem-Ullah et al., 2019). S. litera has been categorized as one of the major pests of Solanaceae members including potato and tomato (Bano and Muqarab, 2017; Ahmed et al., 2021). Various synthetic insecticides are employed to curb this dangerous pest in Pakistan, however, insect resistance to insecticides is a major concern in crop productivity and is likely to increase with climate change (Bano and Muqarab, 2017).
However, the study of management techniques in the laboratory required mass rearing of healthy insects in substantial numbers (Sørensen et al., 2012; Nair et al., 2019). The species and quality of the diet are considered the most important factors affecting the fecundity and mass rearing of the insects (Di et al., 2021). Different diets consisting of proteins, lipids, phosphorus, and mineral have been used for the development of Lepidoptera species including S. litura (Wakil et al., 2011; Campos et al., 2017; Silva et al., 2019). An increasing number of studies are using the artificial diet consisting of canned tomato paste, wheat germ, chickpea powder, soybean, and maize seed along with an artificially prepared vitamin mixture for rearing insects (Wu and Gong, 1997; Wakil et al., 2011; Campos et al., 2017). Gupta et al. (2005) result indicated that a new modified diet (wheat germ, bean flour, chickpea flour, and vitamins) successfully sustained the growth and development for more than ten generations of S. litura, however, some of the ingredients like chickpea flour and vitamins mixture are considered as economic for mass rearing purposes. In another study, a modified diet containing chickpea, red kidney bean flour, and tomato paste has been found nutritive and suitable for rearing Helicoverpa armigera for five generations, while, the study also recommended further improving the recipe of the artificial diets as a larva required longer time to attain the physiological state for molting (Wakil et al., 2011). Others have documented, that low-protein diets containing white bean, wheat germ, and soy bean as ideal for higher reproductive rate, weight, pupation rate, and percentage of adult emergence in H. armigera (Truzi et al., 2019). Likewise, Di et al. (2021) reported shorter developmental times and significantly higher fecundity in S. litura reared on the artificial diet based on beans, wheat germ, and vitamins. They also emphasized that an artificial diet may not be ideal for mating signals in S. litura. So far, longer development times and lower fecundity along with loss of vigor, fitness, and reproductive potential have also been reported due to the rearing of important insects on an artificial diet (Coudron et al., 2002). Still, there is a need to formulate an effective, user-friendly artificial diet using naturally available ingredients for the healthier rearing of lepidopterous insects (Nair et al., 2019; Di et al., 2021).
Therefore, in the present investigation, a modified diet was prepared by changing a few ingredients in the recommended diet described previously (Ahmad et al., 2003; Wu and Gong, 1997; Wakil et al., 2011) to develop an economically feasible, simple and nutritious diet for healthier mass rearing of S. litura.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collection of S. litura
The field population of S. litura was collected from leaves and infested fruits of tomatoes from the main tomato farming areas of the province of Punjab, Pakistan. Neonates were reared separately on a chickpea diet, tomato paste diet, and a modified diet. Chickpea diet (Ahmad et al., 2003) and tomato paste diet (Wu and Gong, 1997; Wakil et al., 2011) were prepared as per published recipes, while the third diet (modified diet) was different in some of the basic ingredients described in tomato paste diet as modified diet contained wheat germ instead of chickpea powder and half amount of tomato paste (Table I).
Rearing procedure
Larvae were reared in 32 wells tray (51 cm long × 26 cm wide × 4 cm high), loaded with 1 mL of each diet separately. The tray was tightly covered with fine muslin cloth kept at 70 ± 5% relative humidity, 25 ± 2°C temperature synchronized with a photoperiod of 14 (L):10 (D) hours. Freshly hatched larvae were shifted on diet from tissue paper strips by using a camel hair brush to avoid abrasive damage. Larvae were brushed gently on a larval diet from tissue paper strips with a camel hair brush to avoid any problems due to fecal matter. Larvae were frequently supervised during the rearing process to avoid the incidence of any disease. After one week, freshly emerged larvae were transferred to individual vials. Pupae appeared after the accomplishment of larval time and were sexed for identification of male or female moths, weighed, and kept individually in plastic vials until adult emergence. The sex of the moth was easily identified by the color of the forewings.
Table I. Ingredients and quantity of different meridic diets used for rearing of Spodoptera litura.
Ingredients |
Chickpea diet |
Tomato paste diet |
Modified diet |
Agar |
13 g |
13 g |
14.5 g |
Chickpea powder |
230 g |
115 g |
0.0 g |
Wheat germ |
0.0 g |
0.0 g |
125 g |
Tomato paste |
0.0 g |
115 g |
60 g |
Ascorbic acid |
3.5 mL |
3.5 mL |
3.5 mL |
Sorbic acid |
1.2 mL |
1.2 mL |
1.2 mL |
Yeast |
37 g |
37 g |
47 g |
Methyl-4 hydroxybenzoate |
2.5 g |
2.5 g |
2.5 g |
Vitamin mixture |
8.0 g |
0.0 g |
0.0 g |
Distilled water |
1000 mL |
11000 mL |
1000 mL |
Linoleic acid |
0.0 mL |
0.0 mL |
1.5 mL |
Streptomycin |
1.2 g |
1.2 g |
0.0 g |
Corn oil |
9.5 mL |
0.0 mL |
0.0 mL |
Sunflower oil |
0.0 mL |
9.5 mL |
0.0 mL |
Emerged moths (25 male and 25 female) were placed in a transparent oviposition plastic jar covered with abrasive as nappy liner assisted for egg-laying. A 10% sugar solution placed on a cotton pad was provided as food. Hatching occurred in 1 to 2 weeks after oviposition and eggs that remained unhatched after 5 days were discarded. A brown ring is developed in fertile eggs on the second day and the whole egg turns black on the third day. Eggs were stored at 15 °C for 7-8 days. Next generation was bred through freshly emerged neonates. There were 5 replications of each treatment with 50 neonates per replication.
Table II. Growth and developmental parameters (Mean± SE) of multiple generations of Spodoptera litura reared on various diets.
Parameters |
Diet |
Generations |
|||||
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
||
Larval duration (days) |
Natural diet |
18.39±0.21a |
17.73±0.27a |
16.89±0.26a |
16.56±0.26a |
16.33±0.26a |
17.56±0.26a |
Tomato diet |
16.50±0.09b |
15.77±0.09b |
15.00±0.04b |
14.65±0.04b |
14.62±0.04b |
15.85±0.04b |
|
Chickpea diet |
14.80±0.17c |
14.12±0.17c |
13.75±0.28c |
13.46±0.24c |
13.19±0.28c |
14.42±0.28c |
|
Modified diet |
12.98±0.09d |
12.58±0.12d |
11.94±0.10d |
11.61±0.10d |
11.38±0.10d |
12.61±0.10d |
|
df |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
F |
215.1 |
168.0 |
110.6 |
119.76 |
105.56 |
106.01 |
|
Pupal duration (days) |
Natural diet |
14.83±0.25a |
14.57±0.41a |
14.51±0.38a |
14.18±0.38a |
13.95±0.38a |
15.39±0.38a |
Tomato diet |
13.65±0.14b |
12.94±0.12b |
12.43±0.17b |
12.10±0.17b |
11.88±0.17b |
13.29±0.17b |
|
Chickpea diet |
11.60±0.28c |
10.91±0.28c |
10.32±0.23c |
9.98±0.23c |
9.72±0.23c |
11.17±0.23c |
|
Modified diet |
10.74±0.26c |
10.22±0.17c |
9.65±0.39c |
9.31±0.39c |
9.08±0.39c |
10.51±0.39c |
|
df |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
F |
58.5 |
52.5 |
50.8 |
50.6 |
50.4 |
50.8 |
|
Adult duration (days) |
Natural diet |
13.75±0.23a |
13.20±0.13a |
12.97±0.23a |
12.72±0.23a |
12.42±0.23a |
13.93±0.23a |
Tomato diet |
12.30±0.03b |
11.86±0.03b |
10.93±0.29b |
10.70±0.29b |
10.38±0.29b |
11.92±0.29b |
|
Chickpea diet |
9.88±0.13c |
9.31±0.02c |
8.93±0.15c |
8.72±0.15c |
8.39±0.15c |
9.93±0.15c |
|
Modified diet |
8.92±0.14d |
8.30±0.02d |
7.93±0.03d |
7.71±0.03d |
7.39±0.03d |
8.93±0.03d |
|
df |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
F |
211.5 |
103 |
120.5 |
121.5 |
121 |
121.2 |
|
Pupal weight (g) |
Natural diet |
257±1.87c |
249±5.34c |
243±1.87c |
240±1.87c |
236±1.85c |
242±1.88c |
Tomato diet |
265±4.56c |
261±3.21bc |
259±4.27bc |
257±1.42b |
252±1.27bc |
259±0.67b |
|
Chickpea diet |
280±2.79b |
268±5.87b |
263±1.77b |
260±0.68b |
257±1.77b |
262±1.77b |
|
Modified diet |
321±2.51a |
315±1.47a |
312±7.06a |
309±2.03a |
305±7.06a |
311±1.70a |
|
df |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
F |
84.5 |
45.5 |
46.5 |
34.8 |
61.1 |
35.5 |
|
Number of eggs |
Natural diet |
186±3.38c |
181±2.06d |
179±3.10c |
175±3.12c |
172±3.11c |
178±3.10c |
Tomato diet |
204±6.32bc |
197±2.81c |
193±5.99bc |
189±5.97bc |
185±5.99bc |
192±5.99bc |
|
Chickpea diet |
214±8.40ab |
207±2.26b |
203±5.77ab |
199±5.75ab |
196±5.78ab |
203±5.77ab |
|
Modified diet |
235±2.85a |
225±1.22a |
222±1.49a |
218±1.48a |
214±1.49a |
221±1.49a |
|
df |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
F |
12.0 |
75.0 |
16 |
16.5 |
17.0 |
17.8 |
Mean followed by same letters are not significantly different at P>0.05
For all treatments, larval duration (days after hatching), pupal period (days between larva and adult stages), adult duration (days), pupal weight (mg), egg production (number), eclosion (% egg hatching), larval mortality (%), pupal mortality (%) and total population (%) were counted up to 6 generations.
Statistical analysis
After one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the data regarding different investigated attributes like larval duration, pupal period, adult duration, pupal weight, egg production, eclosion, larval mortality, pupal mortality and total population were analyzed through Statistics 8.1 for significance (P < 0.05) using the LSD test. The data compared were within generations of similar treatments.
RESULTS
The consequence of a modified diet (D3) on growth and development for the mass rearing of S. litura was compared with the chickpea diet (D1), tomato paste diet (D2), and a natural diet (control: D0) for up to six generations (Table II). Results revealed that development duration in larvae and pupae was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) less in D3 as compared to the other D0, D1, and D2. Pupation consisted of 15-16 days in D0, 12-13 days with the D3, followed by 10-11 days with the D2, and 9-10 days with a D3. The adult period (7-9 days) also decreased significantly (P ≤ 0.05) in D3 in F1 to F6 generation, as compared to D0 (12-14 days) and D2 and D3 (10-12 days). Overall, in all six generations, D3 significantly (P ≤ 0.05) improved the growth and development period of S. litura followed by D2 and D1.
The pupal weight was also significantly (P ≤ 0.05) different amongst different diets in six generations. Larvae fed on D3 had significantly highest pupal weight (300-320 g) up to six generations as compared to D0 (242-257 g), D1 (262-280 g), and D2 (252-259 g). Diet nature significantly (P ≤ 0.05) altered egg production as the highest numbers of eggs (218-234) in F1 till F6 were recorded in D3 when compared with 200-214 eggs in D2 and D1, while 172-186 eggs in T0 (Table II).
A significantly (P ≤ 0.05) greater eclosion rate (>90%) was noticed in insects fed on a D3 as compared to 70-80%, 80-85%, and 80-90% in D0, D1, and D2, respectively (Fig. 1). By the 3rd and 4th generations pupal and larval mortality rates were not significantly different between diets. However, statistically (P ≤ 0.05) less mortality rate (larval and pupal) was recorded in insects fed on D3 at the 5th and 6th generations, as compared to D0, D1, and D2 (Figs. 2 and 3). Likewise, % pupation was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) greater (87-94%) in D3 as compared to Do (63-75%) and the remaining two diets (70-85%) (Fig. 4).
DISCUSSION
This research work was conducted to assess the effect of a new diet on the larval duration (days), pupal period (days), adult duration (days), pupal weight (mg), egg production (number), eclosion (% egg hatching), larval mortality (%), pupal mortality (%) and total population (%) of S. litura for consecutive six generations to check its suitability for insect mass rearing (Nair et al., 2019). The modified diet (D3) differed from the published diets in eliminating the use of ingredients such as chickpea powder and vitamin mixture. Instead, wheat germ and linoleic acid were added in addition to tomato paste, ascorbic acid, sorbic acid, yeast, and methyl-4 hydroxybenzoate. The results depicted that larvae reared on a modified diet had higher growth and egg production along with a shorter developmental period up to six generations than on a natural diet, tomato paste, and chickpea diet. Wheat germ is lighter in carbs, high in carbohydrates, and has more thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, pantothenic acid, and vitamin B6 than the chickpea diet. Moreover, wheat germ is similar to chickpeas for protein. It seems that a D3 may be the most suitable for growth and biomass development in S. litura due to the presence of a balanced amount of prerequisite food ingredients as compared to D1 or D2 (Di et al., 2021). Over and above, D3 also promoted pupation, pupal weight, egg production, and eclosion rate, as compared to the D0, D1, or D2 diet probably due to the consequences of the nutritional quality of diet, which may alter the duration of larval phases during development of larvae (Pinto et al., 2019). The highest average pupation (F1 to F6 = 92%) obtained through a modified diet (D3) was comparable to the previous study of Wakil et al. (2011), who obtained 95% of pupation of H. armigera reared on a chickpea modified diet. The results were also comparable with 79% pupation of H. armigera obtained by rearing on the tapaioca-based diet (granular tapioca, chickpea powder, ascorbic acid, sorbic acid, yeast, methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate, vitamin mixture, and formaldehyde).
Table III. Economic analysis of cost on each diet used for rearing of S. litura.
Diet ingredients |
Cost of ingredients (Rs.) |
Chickpea diet (Rs.) |
Tomato paste diet (Rs.) |
Modified diet (Rs.) |
Agar |
11000/kg |
143 |
143 |
160 |
Chickpea powder |
80/kg |
18.40 |
9.20 |
0.00 |
Wheat germ |
100/kg |
0.00 |
0.00 |
12.50 |
Tomato paste |
100/kg |
0.00 |
11.50 |
6.00 |
Ascorbic acid |
5500/kg |
19.25 |
19.25 |
19.25 |
Sorbic acid |
3500/kg |
4.20 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
Yeast |
9400/kg |
348 |
348 |
442 |
Methyl-4 hydroxybenzoate |
9600/kg |
24.00 |
24.00 |
24.00 |
Vitamin mixture |
3000/25ml |
960.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Linoleic acid |
500/kg |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.75 |
Streptomycin |
5000/25g |
230 |
230 |
0.00 |
Corn oil |
150/kg |
1.43 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Sunflower oil |
150/kg |
0.00 |
1.43 |
0.00 |
Total price per kg of diet |
- |
Rs.1749 |
Rs. 791 |
Rs. 668 |
Economic analysis indicated (Pakistani Rs.) that about 200/kg larvae can be reared successfully in D3 (Rs. 668), which was three times less than the chickpea diet, while Rs.100 less than the tomato paste diet (Table III). The estimated total cost for the production of one pupa was Rs. 3.34 in D3, Rs. 3.95, in D2, and Rs. 58.74 in D1, respectively. The increased cost of rearing using a chickpea diet was due to the addition of some of the expensive ingredients like vitamin mixture and streptomycin, which are not needed in the new diet. Tomato paste contains frequent amounts of vitamins, which can serve their part in the vigorous growth of larvae. The new diet exhibited significant prospective to be used as an adequate and nutrient-rich diet for the rearing of numerous other economically important lepidopterous insects in the laboratory. Further perfections for the formulation are feasible, and this would likely augment the cost-effective use of the diet for mass rearing of S. litura.
CONCLUSION
The modified diet with few modifications yielded a greater pupation rate, pupal weight, egg production, and eclosion rate, as compared to the natural diet, chickpea diet, and tomato paste diet. The modified diet also reduced the duration for larval, pupal and, adult, along with a low rate of larval and pupal mortality. Therefore, it was concluded new modified diet mediated with fewer and cheap ingredients (wheat germ along with tomato paste) is a simple diet that can be successfully used for mass rearing of S. litura.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Statement of conflicts of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Ahmad, M., Arif, M.I. and Ahmad, Z., 2003. Susceptibility of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to new chemistries in Pakistan. Crop Prot., 22: 539-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00219-3
Ahmad, M.S., Afzal, M., Ouedraogo, S.N. and Majeed, M.Z., 2021. Differential feeding preference and performance of leafworm Spodoptera litura Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on some cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Sarhad J. Agric., 37: 791-796. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2021/37.3.791.796
Bano, A. and Muqarab, R.J.P.B., 2017. Plant defence induced by PGPR against Spodoptera litura in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Pl. Biol., 19: 406-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12535
Campos, L.S., Coelho, A. and Parra, J.R., 2017. Artificial diet for laboratory rearing of Condylorrhiza vestigialis (Guenée, 1854) (Lep.: Crambidae). Annls Acad. Bras. Cienc., 89: 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160135
Coudron, T.A., Wittmeyer, J.E. and Kim, Y., 2002. Life history and cost analysis for continuous rearing of Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on a zoophytophagous artificial diet. J. econ. Ent., 95: 1159-1168. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.6.1159
Dhir, B.C., Mohapatra, H.K. and Senapati, B., 1992. Assessment of crop loss in groundnut due to tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (F.). Ind. J. Pl. Prot., 20: 215-217.
Di, X.Y., Yan, B., Wu, C.X., Yu, X.F., Liu, J.F. and Yang, M.F., 2021. Does larval rearing diet lead to premating isolation in Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)? Insects, 12: 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12030203
Gupta, G.P., Rani, S., Birah, A. and Raghuraman, M., 2005. Improved artificial diet for mass rearing of the tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci., 25: 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1079/IJT200551
Hou, M.C. and Sheng, X., 1999. Fecundity and longevity of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Effects of multiple matings. J. econ. Ent., 65: 569-573. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/92.3.569
Khan, H.A., Ali, N., Farooq, M.U., Gill, N.A., Ahmad, T. and Khalique, U., 2020. First authentic report of fall armyworm presence in Faisalabad Pakistan. J. Ent. Zool. Stud., 8: 1512-1514.
Naeem-Ullah, U., Ansari, A.M., Iqbal, N. and Saeed, S., 2019. First authentic report of Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) an alien invasive species from Pakistan. Appl. Sci. Bus. Econ., 6: 1-3.
Nair, R.V., Kulye, M.S. and Kamath, S.P., 2019. A single semi-synthetic diet with improved antimicrobial activity for mass rearing of lepidopteran insect pests of cotton and maize. Ent. Exp. appl., 167: 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12779
Pinto, J.R.L., Torres, A.F., Truzi, C.C., Vieira, N.F., Vacari, A.M. and De Bortoli, S.A., 2019. Artificial corn-based diet for rearing Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Insect Sci., 19: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iez052
Silva, A., Baronio, A., Galzer, E.C.W., Garcia, M.S. and Botton, M., 2019. Development and reproduction of Spodoptera eridania on natural hosts and artificial diet. Braz. J. Biol., 79: 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.177219
Sørensen, J.G., Addison, M.F. and Terblanche, J.S., 2012. Mass-rearing of insects for pest management: Challenges, synergies and advances from evolutionary physiology. Crop Prot., 38: 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.03.023
Truzi, C.C., Holzhausen, H.G., Álvaro, J.C., De Laurentis, V.L., Vieira, N.F., Vacari, A.M. and De Bortoli, S.A., 2019. Food consumption utilization, and life history parameters of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) reared on diets of varying protein level. J. Insect Sci., 19: 12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey138
Wakil, W., Ghazanfar, M.U., Sahi, S.T., Kwon, Y.J. and Qayyum, M.A., 2011. Effect of modified meridic diet on the development and growth of tomato fruit worm Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ent. Res., 1: 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5967.2011.00323.x
Wu, K. and Gong, P., 1997. A new and practical artificial diet for the cotton bollworm. Ent. Sin., 4: 277-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.1997.tb00101.x
Yinghua, S., Yan, D., Jin, C., Jiaxi, W. and Jianwu, W., 2017. Responses of the cutworm Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to two Bt corn hybrids expressing Cry1Ab. Sci. Rep., 7: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41577
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?