Co-circulation of Astrovirus, Rotavirus and Coronavirus in Brazilian Avian Farms
Co-circulation of Astrovirus, Rotavirus and Coronavirus in Brazilian Avian Farms
Carolina Torres Alejo1,2, Laila Andreia Rodrigues Beserra1,2, Paulo Eduardo Brandão1,2, Luis Ramiro Luna Espinoza1,2 and Fabio Gregori1,2*
1Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, CEP 05508 270, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; 2Coronavirus Research Group, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, CEP 05508 270, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Abstract | Several viruses are associated with enteric diseases in avian species, causing decreased growth performance and mortality. In this study, 59 pools of intestinal content of layers, broilers, and breeders were investigated from different Brazilian regions for the presence of rotavirus (RVA, RVD, and RVF), avian coronavirus (ACoV), and avian astrovirus (AAstV), using PCR reactions followed by nucleotide sequencing and analysis. Twenty-nine pools (29/59; 49%) appeared positive for AAstV, 6 pools (6/59; 10%) were positive for RVD, forty-three pools (43/59; 72.8%) were positive for ACoV, and twenty-four pools (24/59; 40.67%) presented concomitant viral infections of two or three investigated agents. The relative high frequency of occurrence of the studied viruses both in single or concomitant infection emphasizes the need for continued monitoring of poultry flocks to better understand its epidemiology and understanding the impact of one virus on the pathobiology of second virus.
Editor | Muhammad Munir, The Pirbright Institute, UK.
Received | May 03, 2016; Accepted | June 23, 2017; Published | October 16, 2017
*Correspondence | Fabio Gregori, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, CEP 05508 270, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Email: [email protected]
DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.hv/2017/4.5.70.77
Citation | Torres, C.A., L.A.R. Beserra, P.E. Brandão, L.R.L. Espinoza and F. Gregori. Co-circulation of astrovirus, rotavirus and coronavirus in Brazilian avian farms. Hosts and Viruses, 4(5): 70-77.
Keywords: Avian, Astrovirus, Rotavirus, Coronavirus, Co-circulation
Introduction
Enteric diseases in avian species, especially in turkeys and poultry, have an important economic impact due to decreased growth performance and mortality (Saif, 2008). Different factors under field conditions such as diversity of etiologic agents, single or concomitant infections, broad range of disease signs, immunological status, and management practices, makes diarrhea prevention a constant challenge (Day and Zsak, 2013). Among viral species associated with the enteric disease syndrome, Avian Astroviruses (AAstV), Rotaviruses (ARV) and Coronaviruses (ACoV) are frequently described worldwide (Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2007; Jindal et al., 2009; Spackman et al., 2010; Moura-Alvarez et al., 2014).
Astroviruses, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus (Matthew et al., 2002) belongs to the Astroviridae family and comprises two genera, Mamastrovirus and Avastrovirus, that infected mammals and avian species, respectively (Bosch et al., 2012). The Avastrovirus genera is further subdivided into three species: Avastrovirus 1, including Turkey Astrovirus type 1 (TAstV-1), Avastrovirus 2, including Avian Nephritis virus (ANV-1 and ANV-2) and Avastrovirus 3, including Turkey Astrovirus type 2 (TAstV-2) and Duck Astrovirus (DAstV) (Bosch et al., 2012).
Rotaviruses, non-enveloped double-stranded RNA (family Reoviridae, subfamily Sedoreovirinae), are classified based on the reactivity or genetic sequencing of the nonstructural protein VP6 into groups A to H (Attoui et al., 2012; Matthijnssens et al., 2012); being groups A (RVA), D (RVD), F (RVF) and G (RVG) detected in avian species (Trojnar et al., 2010; Johne et al., 2011; Ogden et al., 2012; Kindler et al., 2013). Using the metagenomic approach and the VP6-based molecular classification scheme, Mihalov-Kóvacs et al. (2015) found evidence for a novel rotavirus species that they tentatively called Rotavirus I.
Regarding coronaviruses, positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses (order Nidovirales, family Coronaviridae, subfamily Coronavirinae), are classified in four genera, Alphacoronavirus (α-CoV), Betacoronavirus (β-CoV), Gammacoronavirus (γ-CoV) and Deltacoronavirus (δ-CoV) (de Groot et al., 2012; Woo et al., 2012; Fehr and Perlman, 2015). Avian Coronavirus (ACoV), is a γ-CoV that infects domesticated (Infectious Bronchitis Virus in chickens and Turkey Coronavirus) and wild birds and can cause poultry diseases related to respiratory, reproductive and renal systems and enteritis (Cavanagh, 2003; Cavanagh, 2005; Villarreal et al., 2007).
According to some studies, co-circulation of these viruses may cause a negative impact on intestinal absorptive functions (Ismail et al., 2003). Moreover, AAstV could be associated with ARV and ACoV, likely causing runting-stunting syndrome (RSS), mainly, in broilers and PEMS (poult enteritis mortality syndrome) in other species of birds, respectively (Barnes et al., 2000).
In Brazil, single or concomitant detection of these viruses in poultry and turkeys, have been reported by several research groups (Villarreal, et al., 2006a,b; Bunger et al., 2009; Moura-Alvarez, et al., 2013; Nuñez et al., 2013; Mettifogo et al., 2014; Moura-Alvarez, et al., 2014). A rapid, comprehensive and continuous monitoring of these prevalent viruses related to diarrhea is a key to better understanding of viral dynamics and to provide helpful data on critical analysis of preventive measures on farms. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the frequency of occurrence and molecular diversity of AAstV, ARV and ACoV from broilers, layers and broiler breeders from Brazilian poultry farms.
Materials and Methods
Samples
In 2013, a total of 59 flocks from 6 different Brazilian avian production states were evaluated: Rio Grande do Sul (RS); Paraná (PR); São Paulo (SP); Minas Gerais (MG); Mato Grosso do Sul (MS); Pernambuco (PE). Samples were collected as pools of complete intestinal content from five birds (broilers, layers and broiler breeders), aged between 1 to 70 weeks, with or without clinical signs, that included moderate increase or high mortality, drop in performance, lack of uniformity and disorders of respiratory, reproductive and enteric tracts. This study was approved by the Committee on Ethics for Animal Trials of the School of Veterinary Medicine, University of São Paulo, under protocol number 3070/2013.
Reverse Transcription
Samples for all screening PCR’s were prepared as 50% (vol/vol) suspensions in DEPC treated water, clarified at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4ºC, and the supernatant was used for RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol ReagentTM (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) and cDNA was synthesized using 50 ng of random primers and 200 U of SuperScript III Reverse TranscriptaseTM (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) as described by the manufacturer.
Astrovirus Nested-PCR: It was adopted a heminested PCR protocol targeting the RdRp gene amplification of all astroviruses, using primers and thermocycling conditions described by Chu et al. (2008). The expected product size was 422 base pairs (bp).
Rotavirus PCR: The cDNA was subjected to three different PCR’s targeting the NSP5/VP6 gene, with RVA, RVD and RVF primers and thermal cycling conditions (Salem et al., 2010; Bezerra et al., 2012; Beserra et al., 2014) generating a 317 bp, 742 bp and 881 bp gel band, respectively.
Avian Coronavirus Nested-PCR: Each sample was screened for ACoV as described by Cavanagh et al. (2002), targeting the 3’-UTR with amplicons of 179 bp. Positive 3’-UTR samples were then tested by a genotype S-gene targeted multiplex RT-PCR for Massachusetts, D274 and 4/91 genotypes (Cavanagh et al., 1999) and a pan-IBV S1 gene (ACoV) RT-PCR described by Torres et al. (2014) (450 bp amplicon). All amplification steps for screening and genotyping were carried out with GoTaqTM Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions.
Table 1: Frequency of occurrence of single and mixed virus detection from avian fecal material (n=59) according to farming type (Layer n=24; Broiler n=28; Breeder n=7).
Virus(es) | Frequency % (n) | Farming Type Frequency % (n) | ||
Layer | Broiler | Breeder | ||
AstVA |
8.47% (5) | 40% (2) | 60% (3) | - |
RVDB |
0% (0) | - | - | - |
ACoVC |
32.2% (19) | 31.57%(6) | 57,89%(11) | 10,52%(2) |
AstV+ ACoV | 30.51% (18) | 38.9%(7) | 33.3%(6) | 27.8%(5) |
AstV+ ACoV +RVD | 10.17% (6) | - | 100% (6) | - |
Negative for all viruses | 18.64% (11) | 81.9% (9) | 18.1%(2) |
- |
A: Astroviruses; B: Rotavirus D; c: Avian coronavirus
Table 2: Frequency of occurrence of single and mixed virus detection from avian fecal material (n=59) according to farming type and geographical origin (Brazilian States): MS, MG, PR, PE, RS, SP.
Virus(es) | Frequency % (n) | Farming Type (n) | ||
Layer | Broiler | Breeder | ||
AstVA |
8.47% (5) | MS(1) RS(1) | PR(1) RS(2) | - |
RVDB |
0% (0) | - | - | - |
ACoVC |
32.2% (19) | PE(1) RS(5) | PR(3) RS(8) | RS(2) |
AstV+ ACoV | 30.51%(18) | MG(1) MS(1) PE(1) RS(3) PR(1) | PR(3) RS(3) | RS(5) |
AstV+ ACoV +RVD | 10.17% (6) | - | PR(2) SP(4) | - |
Negative for all viruses | 18.64% (11) | MS(2) PE(2) RS(4) SP(1) | PR(1) RS(1) |
- |
A: Astroviruses; B: Rotavirus D; c: Avian coronavirus
RT-PCR controls: The rotavirus strain NCDV (Nebraska calf diarrhea virus), strain AstV Brazil 1 and ACoV Massachusetts strain vaccine (NOBILIS™ IB Ma5; MSD Animal Health, Boxmeer, The Netherlands) were used as positive controls for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). As negative controls, ultrapure water treated with 0.1% DEPC was included.
Nucleotide sequencing and phylogenetic analysis
Nucleotide sequences from AstV, ARV and ACoV were submitted to phylogenetic analysis in order to confirm the virus genera. PCR products were purified with EXOSAP-it (USB®) reagent, submitted to bidirectional DNA sequencing with BigDye 3.1 (Cycle Sequencing Kit, Applied BiosystemsTM, Carlsbad, USA) and resolved in an ABI-3500 Genetic Analyser (Applied BiosystemsTM, Carlsbad, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. The nucleotide sequences of each sample were aligned with homologous representatives from different Astrovirus, Rotavirus or Coronavirus strains retrieved from GenBank, with CLUSTAL/W 2.1 (Larkin et al., 2007) software, and a phylogenetic tree was generated with the neighbor-joining distance method and the maximum composite likelihood substitution model with 1,000 bootstrap replicates using MEGA 6.0 (Tamura et al., 2013) (data not shown).
Results and Discussion
In the present study, 59 pools of complete intestinal content were used; being 81.45% (48/59) positive samples for at least one the screened viruses. The results per single or concomitant detection of virus (es), bird type, and state of origin, are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2.
Astrovirus
Twenty-nine pools (29/59; 49%) were considered positive for astrovirus (Avastrovirus). Regarding type species, ANV was detected in twenty-one (21/29; 72.4%) samples, TAstV-1 in six (6/29; 20.6%) samples and CAstV in two (2/29; 6.89%) samples.
Rotavirus
Out of 59 pools of intestinal contents tested by RT-PCR, 6 showed positive results (6/59; 10%) for RVD, whereas none of the samples were positive for RVA and RVF. The phylogenetic tree of VP6 nucleotide sequences depicted that the six Brazilian rotavirus strains segregated with the typical rotavirus D representatives, while the topology maintained the remaining groups (A, B, C, F, G, H and I) apart from each other and supported by high bootstrap values (>90%) (not shown).
Avian Coronavirus
Viral RNA was detected in forty-three sampled pools (43/59; 72.8%). The multiplex typing PCR revealed that all strains of ACoV detected do not belong to the Massachusetts, D274 and 4/91 genotypes but were classified by the phylogenetic analysis of the pan-IBV S1 gene as Brazilian type (not shown). All sequences were related to GI-11 genotype according to Valastro et al. (2013).
Concomitant viral infections
A total of 24 (24/59; 40.67%) pools presented concomitant viral infections. Of these, 18 (18/24; 75%) presented AstV+ACoV and 6 (6/24; 25%) AstV+RVD+ACoV and the higher frequencies of occurrence were found in layers and broilers (Table 1).
Regarding the AstV+ACoV co-circulation, 83.3% (15/18) were positive for ANV+ACoV, 11.1% (2/18) for TAstV-1+ACoV and 5.55% (1/18) for CAstV+ACoV. Finally, 50% (3/6) of the positive samples for the three screened viruses, showed association between ANV+RVD+ACoV, 33.3% (2/6) with TAstV-1+RVD+ACoV and 16.6% (1/6) with CAstV+ RVD+ACoV.
Recent reports suggest that concomitant enteric viral infections may increase the severity of clinical signs in avian species (Spackman et al., 2010). According to previously reports in Brazilian poultry farms (Mettifogo et al., 2014), ACoV had the highest frequency of occurrence (72%) followed by AAstV (48%) and the association of both (18/24; 75%) was mainly detected in layers (8/18; 44%). Increase mortality and decrease production have been shown in the studied farms in which, co-circulation of these two viruses were observed (Mettifogo et al., 2014).
Some lineages of Avian Coronaviruses can cause, for example, gastrointestinal diseases (TCoV - Turkey coronaviruses) (Ambepitiya, et al., 2015) and other ones, as several serotypes of Infectious Bronchitis Virus (IBV) and IBV-like viruses, showed enterotropism even they primarily infect the respiratory tract (Cavanagh, 2007), having an important economic impact due to production decrease and the possibility of secondary infections (Cavanagh, 2003).
Astroviruses appear to be widely disseminated and endemic in poultry in the world, and concomitant infection of flocks with two or more enteric viruses is common (Baxendale and Mebatsion, 2004; Jindal et al., 2010; Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2006, Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2007; Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2008). So far, there is only one report of CAstV in Brazilian poultry (Mettifogo et al., 2014), being the third most frequent virus detected. AAstV have been also identified in turkeys (Silva et al., 2008; Moura-Alvarez et al., 2013) in Brazil, suggesting a possible relationship between astroviruses and enteric diseases in birds (Nunez et al., 2015).
Moreover, in chickens, AAstV and ARV are associated with RSS causing stunted growth, renal injury and death of young chickens (Imada et al., 1979, Shirai et al., 1991). Results showed herein confirm the circulation of group D (RVD) rotavirus in Brazilian poultry farm, though the frequency of occurrence is still low. RVD was previously detected in Brazil by a specific RT-PCR assay, with occurrence ranging from 53% (16/30 samples) and 35.3% (30/85) to 3.6% (4/111) (Bezerra et al., 2012; Bezerra et al., 2014; Beserra et al., 2015).
In the field, rotaviruses are commonly detected via molecular methods in both turkeys and chickens, often in concomitant infections with other viruses such as astroviruses, reoviruses and coronaviruses; however, the situation is complicated by the fact that rotaviruses (and other co-infecting viruses) are often found in healthy flocks, exhibiting no enteric disease signs (Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2007; Pantin-Jackwood et al., 2008; Jindal et al., 2009; Jindal et al., 2012).
Interestingly, in five broilers farms located in Rio Grande do Sul state, we have detected AAstV (TAstV-1) in single and concomitant infection of AAstV (ANV) and ACoV. These farms were close to two of the biggest Brazilian turkey farms, where Moura et al. (2014) previously reported TAstV-2 and TCoV (besides rotavirus) co-circulation in turkey flocks with severe enteritis and high mortality. One can speculate interspecies transmition between these species but when comparing sequencing data from different viral genome.
Conclusions
Three enteric viruses (AAstV, ACoV and RDV) were found in avian farms (layer, broiler, and breeder) from six Brazilian states. This is the first report of the detection of avian astrovirus and coronavirus in association in breeders from Mato Grosso do Sul state, and coronavirus from intestinal contents in breeders Pernambuco state. The relatively high frequency of occurrence of at least one of the studied viruses denotes the importance to performed a multifactorial diagnosis, as well as the need for continued monitoring of poultry flocks to better understand its epidemiology.
Authors Contribution
Carolina Torres Alejo, Laila Andreia Rodrigues Beserra, Luis Ramiro Luna Espinoza performed the laboratory methodologies and contributed to writing of the manuscript. Paulo Eduardo Brandão provided samples and contributed to writing of the manuscript. Fabio Gregori participated in its design, coordination, and writing of the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript for submission.
References
Ambepitiya, W., de Vries, R.P., Weerts, E.A. W.S., van Beurden, S.J., Peng, W., McBride, R., Ducatez, M., Guy, J., Brown, P., Eterradossi, N., Gröne, A., Paulson, J.C. and Verheijea, M.H. 2015. Novel Receptor Specificity of Avian Gammacoronaviruses that cause enteritis. J. Virol. 89: 8783-8792. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00745-15
Attoui, H., Mertens, P.P.C., Becnel, J., Belaganahalli, S., Bergoin, M., Brussaard, C.P., Chappell, J. D., Ciarlet, M., del Vas, M., Dermody, T.S., Dormitzer, P.R., Duncan, R., Fang, Q., Graham, R., Guglielmi, K.M., Harding, R.M., Hillman, B., Makkay, A., Marzachì, C., Matthijnssens, J., Milne, R.G., Mohd Jaafar, F., Mori, H., Noordeloos, A.A., Omura, T., Patton, J.T., Rao, S., Maan, M., Stoltz, D., Suzuki, N., Upadhyaya, N.M., Wei, C. and Zhou, H. 2012. Family Reoviridae, p.603-613. In Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses (Ninth Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses). A.M. Q. King, Elsevier Academic Press, New York, NY.
Barnes, H.J., Guy, J.S. and Vaillancourt, J.P. 2000. Poult enteritis complex. Rev. Sci. Tech. 19:565-588. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.19.2.1234
Baxendale, W. and Mebatsion, T. 2004. The isolation and characterization of astroviruses from chickens. Avian Pathol. 33:364-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307945042000220426
Beserra, L.A. R. and Gregori, F. 2014. Description of rotavirus F in broilers from Brazilian poultry farms. Avian Dis. 58:458-461. https://doi.org/10.1637/10747-121613-ResNote.1
Beserra, L.A.R., Bernardes, N.T.C.G., Brandão, P.E. and Gregori, F. 2015. Monitoring and molecular characterization of group D rotavirus in Brazilian poultry farms. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 35(6):536-540. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X201500600008
Bezerra, D.A., Silva, R.R., Kaiano, J.H., Silvestre, R.V., Oliveira, D.S., Linhares, A.C., Gabbay, Y. B. and Mascarenhas, J.D. 2012. Detection of avian group D rotavirus using the polymerase chain reaction for the VP6 gene. J. Virol. Methods 185:189-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.07.017
Bezerra, D.A., Silva, R.R., Kaiano, J.H., Oliveira, D.S., Gabbay, Y.B., Linhares, A.C. and Mascarenhas, J.D. 2014. Detection, epidemiology and characterization of VP6 and VP7 genes of group D rotavirus in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 43:238-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2014.913097
Bosch, A., Guix, S., Krishna, N.K., Méndez, E., Monroe, S.S., Pantin-Jackwood, M. and Schultz-Cherry, S. 2012. Family Astroviridae, p.953-959. In Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses (Ninth Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses). A.M. Q. King, Elsevier Academic Press, New York, NY.
Bunger, A.N., Chacón, J.L., Jones, R.C. and Ferreira, J.P. 2009. Detection and molecular characterization of gene 3 and 5 of turkey coronavirus from turkeys with severe enteritis in Brazil. Avian Dis. 53(3):356-362. https://doi.org/10.1637/8507-103108-Reg.1
Cavanagh D., Mawditt K., Britton P. & Naylor C. J. 1999. Longitudinal field studies of infectious bronchitis virus and avian pneumovirus in broilers using type-specific polymerase chain reactions. Avian Pathol. 28:593-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459994399
Cavanagh D., Mawditt K., Welchmand D. B., Britton P. & Gough R. E. 2002. Coronaviruses from pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) are genetically closely related to coronaviruses of domestic fowl (Infectious Bronchitis Virus) and turkeys. Avian Pathol. 31:81-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450120106651
Cavanagh D. & Naqi S. A. 2003. Infectious bronchitis, p.511-526. In Diseases of Poultry. Ed. B. W. Calnek, H. J. Barnes, C. W. Beard, and L. R. McDougald, Iowa: State University Press, Ames, IA.
Cavanagh D. 2005. Corornaviruses in poultry and other birds. Avian Pathol. 34(6):439-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450500367682
Cavanagh D. 2007. Coronavirus avian infectious bronchitis virus. Vet Res. 38:281-297. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2006055
Chu D. K. W., Poon L. L. M., Guan Y. & Peiris J. S. M. 2008. Novel astroviruses in insectivorous bats. J Virol. 82(18):9107-9114. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00857-08
Day M. & Zsak L. 2013. Recent progress in the characterization of avian enteric viruses. Avian Dis. 57(3):573-580. https://doi.org/10.1637/10390-092712-Review.1
de Groot R. J., Baker S. C., Baric R., Enjuanes L., Gorbalenya A. E., Holmes K. V., Perlman S., Poon L., Rottier P. J. M., Talbot P. J., Woo P. C. Y. & Ziebuhr J. 2012. Family Coronaviridae, p 806-828. In Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses (Ninth Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses). A.M. Q. King, Elsevier Academic Press, New York, NY.
Fehr A. R. & Perlman S. 2015. Coronaviruses: An overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol Biol. 1282:1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2438-7_1
Imada T., Yamaguchi S. and Kawamura H. 1979. Pathogenicity for baby chicks of the G-4260 strain of the picornavirus “avian nephritis virus”. Avian Dis. 23:582-588. strain of the picornavirus “avian nephritis virus”. Avian Dis. 23:582-588.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1589733
Ismail M. M., Tang Y. and Saif Y. M. 2003. Pathogenicity of turkey coronavirus in turkeys and chickens. Avian Dis. 47:515-522. https://doi.org/10.1637/5917
Jinda, N., Patnayak D. P., Ziegler A. F., Lago A. and Goyal S. M. 2009. A retrospective study on poult enteritis syndrome in Minnesota. Avian Dis. 53:268-275. https://doi.org/10.1637/8513-110308-Reg.1
Jindal N., Patnayak D. P., Chander Y., Ziegler A. F. and Goyal S. M. 2010. Detection and molecular characterization of enteric viruses from poult enteritis syndrome in turkeys. Poult Sci 89:217-226. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00424
Jindal, N., Chander Y., Patnayak D. P., Mor S. K., Ziegler A. F. and Goyal S. M. 2012. A multiplex RT-PCR for the detection of astrovirus, rotavirus, and reovirus in turkeys. Avian Dis. 56:592-596. https://doi.org/10.1637/9958-100911-ResNote.1
Johne R., Otto P., Roth B., Löhren U., Belnap D., Reetz J. and Trojnar E. 2011. Sequence analysis of the VP6-encoding genome segment of avian group F and G rotaviruses. Virology. 442:384-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2011.01.031
Kindler E., Trojnar E., Heckel G., Otto P. H. and Johne R. 2013. Analysis of rotavirus species diversity and evolution including the newly determined full-length genome sequences of rotavirus F and G. Infec. Genet. Evol. 14:58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2012.11.015
Koci M. D. and Schultz-Cherry S. 2002. Avian astroviruses, Avian Pathol. 31:3213-3227. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450220136521
Larkin M. A., Blackshields G., Brown N. P., Chenna R., McGettiga P. A. N., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I. M., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J. and Higgins D. G. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947-2948. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
Matthijnssens J. Otto P. H., Ciarlet M., Desselberger U., Van Ranst M. and Johne R. 2012. VP6-sequence-based cutoff values as a criterion for rotavirus species demarcation. Arch. Virol. 157(6):1177-1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-012-1273-3
Mettifogo E., Nuñez L. F. N., Chacon J. L., Santander S. H., Astolfi-Ferreira C. S., Jerez J. A., Jones R. C. and Piantino-Ferreira A. J. 2014. Emergence of Enteric Viruses in Production Chickens is a Concern for Avian Health. Sci World J. ID450423. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/450423
Mihalov-Kovács E., Gellért A., Marton S., Farkas S. L., Fehér E. , Oldal M., Jakab F., Martella V. and Bányai K. 2015. Candidate new rotavirus species in sheltered dogs, Hungary. Emerg Infect Dis. 21(4):660-663. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2104.141370
Moura-Alvarez J., Chacón J. L., Scanavini L., Nunez L. F., Astolfi-Ferreira C. S., Jones R. C. and Piantino Ferreira A. J. 2013. Enteric viruses in Brazilian turkey flocks: Single and multiple virus infection frequency according to age and clinical signs of intestinal disease. Poult. Sci. 92:945-955. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02849
Moura-Alvarez J., Nunez L. F., Astolfi-Ferreira C. S., Knobl T., Chacón J. L., Moreno A. M., Jones R. C. and Ferreira A. J. 2014. Detection of enteric pathogens in Turkey flocks affected with severe enteritis in Brazil. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 46(6):1051-1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0612-7
Nunez L. F. N. and Piantino Ferreira A. J. 2013. Viral agents related to enteric disease in commercial chicken flocks, with special reference to Latin America. World Poultry Sci. J. 69:853-864. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000858
Nunez L. F., Parra S. H., Mettifogo E., Catroxo M. H., Astolfi-Ferreira C. S. and Piantino Ferreira A. J. 2015. Isolation of chicken astrovirus from specific pathogen-free chicken embryonated eggs. Poult Sci. 94(5):947-954. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev086
Ogden K. M., Johne R. and Patton J. T. 2012. Rotavirus RNA polymerases resolve into two phylogenetically distinct classes that differ in their mechanism of template recognition. Virology. 431:50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2012.05.011
Pantin-Jackwood M. J., Spackman E. and Woolcock P. R. 2006. Molecular characterization and typing of chicken and turkey astroviruses circulating in the United States: implications for diagnostics. Avian Dis. 50:397-404. https://doi.org/10.1637/7512-020606R.1
Pantin-Jackwood M. J., Spackman E., Day J. M. and Rives D. 2007. Periodic monitoring of commercial turkeys for enteric viruses indicates continuous presence of astrovirus and rotavirus on the farms. Avian Dis. 51:674-680. https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086(2007)51[674:PMOCTF]2.0.CO;2
Pantin-Jackwood M. J., Day J. M., Jackwood M. W. and Spackman E. 2008. Enteric viruses detected by molecular methods in commercial chicken and turkey flocks in the United States between 2005 and 2006. Avian Dis. 52:235-244. https://doi.org/10.1637/8174-111507-Reg.1
Saif Y. M. 2008. Viral Enteric Infections: introduction. 12th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
Salem, A. N. B., Sergei A. C., Olga P. B., Olga G. A., Mahjoub A. and Larissa B. P. 2010. Multiplex nested RT-PCR for the detection of porcine enteric viruses. J. Virol. Methods. 165(2):283-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.02.010
Shirai J., Nakamura K., Shinohara K. and Kawamura H. 1991. Pathogenicity and antigenicity of avian nephritis isolates. Avian Dis. 35:49-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1591294
Silva S. E. L., Bonetti A. M., Petrocelli A. T. M., Ferrari H. F., Luvizotto M. C. R. and Cardoso T. C. 2008. Detection of turkey astrovirus in young poults affected with poult enteritis complex in Brazil. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 70:629-631. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.70.629
Spackman E., Day J. M. and Pantin-Jackwood M. J. 2010. Astrovirus, reovirus, and rotavirus concomitant infection causes decreased weight gain in broad-breasted white poults. Avian Dis. 54:16-21. https://doi.org/10.1637/8986-070909-Reg.1
Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A. and Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:2725-2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
Torres C. A., Tonietti P. O., Hora A. S., Taniwaki S. A., Villarreal L. Y. B. and Brandão P. E. Avian coronavirus in quail: continued surveillance after the introduction of a vaccination program. In: Proc. 8th Sypmosium on Avian Corona- and Pneumoviruses and Complicating Pathogens/2nd Meeting Cost Action FA1207, Rauischholzhausen, Germany, p.77-86. 2014.
Trojnar E., Otto P., Roth., Reetz B. B, J. and Johne E. 2010. The genome segments of a group D rotavirus possess group A-like conserved termini but encode group-specific proteins. J. Virol. 84:10254-10265. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00332-10
Valastro V., Holmes E. C., Britton, P., Fusaro, A., Jackwood, M. W., Cattoli, G., Monne, I. 2016. S1 gene-based phylogeny of infectious bronchitis virus: An attempt to harmonize virus classification. Inf. Genet. Evol. 39:349-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.015
Villarreal L. Y. B., Assayag M. S., Brandão P. E., Chacón J. L. V., Bunger A. N. D., Astolfi-Ferreira C. S., Gomes C. R., Jones R. C. and Ferreira A. J. P. 2006a. Identification of Turkey Astrovirus and Turkey Coronavirus in an Outbreak of Poult Enteritis and Mortality Syndrome. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 8:131-135. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-635x2006000200010
Villarreal L. Y. B., Uliana G., Valenzuela C., Chacón J. L. V., Saidenberg A. B. S., Sanches A. A., Brandão P. E., Jerez J. A. and Ferreira A. J. P. 2006b. Rotavirus Detection and Isolation from Chickens With or Without Symptoms. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 8:187-191. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2006000300009
Villarreal L. Y. B., Brandão, P. E. and Chacón J. L. 2007. Molecular characterizations of infectious bronchitis virus strains isolated from the enteric contents of Brazilian laying hens and broilers. Avian Dis. 51(4):974-978. https://doi.org/10.1637/7983-041307.1
Woo P., Lau C. Y. S. K., Lam C. S., Lau C. C., Tsang A. K., Lau J. H., Bai R., Teng J. L., Tsang C. C., Wang M., Zheng B. J., Chan K. H. & Yuen K. Y. 2012. Discovery of Seven Novel Mammalian and Avian Coronaviruses in the Genus Deltacoronavirus Supports Bat Coronaviruses as the Gene Source of Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus and Avian Coronaviruses as the Gene Source of Gammacoronavirus and Deltacoronavirus. J Virol. 86:3995-4008. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.06540-11
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?