Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN
Latest Blogs: https://researcherslinks.com/en/kahoot-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/blooket-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/comcast-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/gimkit-login/

Beer Waste as a Feed Additive: Impacts on the Health and Performance of Sheep

JAHP_12_4_528-534

Research Article

Beer Waste as a Feed Additive: Impacts on the Health and Performance of Sheep

Efi Rokana1*, Zein Ahmad Baihaqi1,2, Khoirul Wafa1, Kalvin Putra Wahyudatama1, Ferdian Ginanjar1, Rini Mastuti3, Amiril Mukmin1, Miarsono Sigit4

1Program of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Islam Kadiri, Jl. Sersan Suharmaji 38 Kediri, 64128, Indonesia; 2Research Center for Animal Husbandry, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jl. Raya Jakarta, Bogor Cibinong, 16915, Indonesia; 3Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Samudra, Jl. Prof. Dr. Syarief Thayeb, Meurandeh, Aceh, 24416, Indonesia; 4Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University, Jl. Dukuh Kupang 54, Dukuh Pakis, Surabaya, 60225, Indonesia.

Abstract | There is a growing trend in identifying alternative feed ingredients to address the issue of high production costs in sheep fattening systems. This research aims to determine the effect of utilizing beer waste on the performance and health of sheep. The study involved 24 female thin-tailed sheep, each approximately 7 months old. They were divided into four groups: a control group and three groups that received beer waste at 5%, 10%, and 15% of their ration. Feed consumption was measured by calculating the difference between the amount of feed given and the remaining feed. Initial body weight measurements were taken weekly before morning feeding. Blood samples were drawn from the jugular vein and analyzed for hematology and serum chemistry in a laboratory. The results did not show significant differences in productivity parameters (feed consumption, average daily gain, feed conversion, and income over feed cost) between control and beer waste fed groups. Health parameters, including hematology (hemoglobin, erythrocytes, leukocytes) and blood chemical parameters (total protein, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine), remained within normal ranges in all beer waste fed groups. The study concludes that incorporating beer waste into sheep rations provides the benefits of low cost and high protein content, with no detrimental effects on the health or performance of the sheep.

 

Keywords | Beer waste, Feed additive, Health, Performance, Sheep


Received | April 26, 2024; Accepted | August 30, 2024; Published | October 01, 2024

*Correspondence | Efi Rokana, Program of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Islam Kadiri, Jl. Sersan Suharmaji 38 Kediri, 64128, Indonesia; Email: efi@uniska-kediri.ac.id

Citation | Rokana E, Baihaqi ZA, Wafa K, Wahyudatama KP, Ginanjar F, Mastuti R, Mukmin A, Sigit M (2024). Beer waste as a feed additive: Impacts on the health and performance of sheep. J. Anim. Health Prod. 12(4): 528-534.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2024/12.4.528.534

ISSN (Online) | 2308-2801

 

BY%20CC.png 

Copyright: 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



INTRODUCTION

The local sheep fattening production system is facing extremely high production costs, particularly concerning feed requirements. There is an urgent need for research into the utilization of beer dregs as an alternative and sustainable source of animal feed (Aragão et al., 2023). Beer dregs, a by-product of the beer brewing industry, offer a potential solution for reducing production costs associated with animal feed in livestock feedlots (Mussatto, 2014). The abundant protein content of beer dregs, available at an affordable price, presents an attractive alternative that holds promise for enhancing the economic sustainability of the livestock sector (Wen et al., 2019).

Utilizing beer dregs as animal feed extends beyond experimental endeavors to become a strategic initiative aimed at reducing production costs. According to Wang et al. (2021), by transforming waste into a valuable source of nutrition, the primary objective is to establish a business model characterized by enhanced efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and environmental friendliness. Mission to reduce animal feed production costs can involve utilizing agro-industrial waste. However, in recent years, this waste has been studied for its positive effects on animal health, methane reduction, and protein protection, as demonstrated by Baihaqi et al. (2020a, b, c, 2022, 2023)and Lisnanti et al. (2023). Stahn et al. (2023) and Ran et al. (2021) indicated that the beer dregs can use in animal feed but the scientific research is crucial. Questions regarding the impact of beer dregs supplementation on growth, nutritional balance, and overall animal health necessitate thorough investigation to substantiate such assertions.

The substantial protein content inherent in beer dregs provides a robust foundation for considering its integration as a protein source in animal diets (Tongtong et al., 2022). By harnessing this overlooked resource, a significant contribution is anticipated towards alleviating the persistent challenge of high feed costs within the livestock industry (Naik et al., 2023). This study aims to investigate the effects of beer waste in sheep diets on production and health. The research not only promises new insights into the potential of beer dregs as animal feed but also seeks to establish a solid scientific framework by confirming the impact of beer dregs on livestock productivity and health, with the goal of optimizing livestock production amidst an evolving landscape of economic challenges.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study period and location

The present study was conducted from August 2023 to December 2023, at the Kalvin Farm, Nganjuk sheep farm in East Java. Nutrient analysis was carried out at the animal feed laboratory at Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, while hematological and blood chemistry analyses were performed at Brawijaya University, Malang.

Experimental design

During the livestock preparation phase, the sheep were grouped according to body weight, underwent health checks, and received vitamin supplementation. Prior to the experimental work, a four-week adaptation period was observed, with feed provided twice daily. The study utilized 24 female thin-tailed sheep, approximately 7 months old, which were randomly assigned to four treatment groups based on their body weight. Beer dregs were incorporated into the basal feed at varying proportions for each treatment. The treatment groups were; P0: ration + 0% beer waste, P1: ration + 5% beer waste, P2: ration + 10% beer waste, P3: ration + 15% beer waste. The chemical analysis of ration used in the study are presented in Table 1.

 

Table 1: The results of proximate analysis of rations offered to various groups of sheep.

Ration/Group

DM

(%)

CP

(%)

Ash

(%)

CF

(%)

Price (IDR)

P0 88.92 14.92 2.48 17.39 2,800
P1 86.87 15.41 2.54 17.41 2,500
P2 84.36 15.25 2.71 19.68 2,400
P3 81.95 15.33 2.33 20.42 2,200

Note: Proximate analysis were done at Universitas Brawijaya; DM: Dry Matter, OM: Organic Matter, CF: Crude Fiber.

Research materials, including beer dregs and other feed ingredients, were sourced from Sadewa Animal Feed Ltd. in Tulungagung. The basal ration included copra, palm oil meal, corn gluten feed, white pollard, cassava cobs, soybean hulls, and corn slammer. The treatment of animals according to the research design lasted up to 8 weeks. Observations of feed consumption, digestibility, average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion, and income over feed cost (IOFC) were recorded based on the methodology of Suwignyo et al. (2017). Fecal collection, which occurred over seven days before the study completion, involved weighing, drying, and subsequent analysis for dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein. Hematological and blood chemistry analyses were conducted following the methodology of Baihaqi et al. (2020a).

Statistical analysis

The collected data were analyzed using ANOVA. The least significant difference (LSD) test was applied if significant differences (P < 0.05) or highly significant differences (P < 0.01) were detected.

RESULT AND DISCUSSIONS

The effect of adding beer waste on sheep productivity parameters

The observations on productivity parameters, including feed consumption, ADG, feed conversion, and IOFC, are presented in Table 2.

Based on the data in Table 2, all treatment groups showed non-significant differences (P > 0.05) in the feed consumption parameters. The average feed consumption in this study ranged from 711 to 789 g/head/day, average daily gain ranged from 45.28 to 55.00 g/head/day, average feed conversion ranged from 14.33 to 16.96 g/head/day, and the average Income Over Feed Cost (IOFC) ranged from Rp 47,215 to Rp 75,337 per head.

In this study, beer dregs were used as a feed substitute due to their high protein content and relatively low cost. However, this material has the drawback of low Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN), which may potentially impact livestock

 

Table 2: The effect of inclusion of beer waste in the sheep ration on productivity parameters.

Treatment

Feed consumption (g/head/day)

ADG (g/head/day)

Feed conversion (g/head/day)

IOFC (IDR)

P0 711.79±238.01 45.28±12.33 16.62±6.06 47.215±77.788
P1 751.67±194.34 45.82±8.21 17.27±6.53 47.891±39.304
P2 784.50±202.96 48.90±12.28 16.96±6.56 55.827±43.331
P3 789.50±204.43 55.00±5.56 14.33±3.33 75.337±25.535

Note: The treatments did not show statistically significant differences (P>0.05) in feed consumption, ADG (average daily gain), and IOFC (income over feed cost) of various groups.

productivity parameters. The non-significant impact is attributed to the fact that feed conversion value is highly dependent on dry matter consumption and the daily weight gain of the livestock (Kenny et al., 2018). Factors influencing feed consumption include the specific livestock, the type of feed provided, and environmental conditions. Feed conversion rate depends on the quality of the feed; better digestibility leads to better feed conversion (Oonincx et al., 2015). This is related to the difference between the income from the sale of average daily gain (ADG) production and feed costs. The use of beer dregs in the ration can enhance ADG production while potentially reducing feed costs, as the treatment feed is cheaper, thus improving Income Over Feed Cost (IOFC). IOFC is calculated by subtracting the cost of feed from the value of weight gain during the study. Factors influencing IOFC calculations include the increase in weight gain during fattening, feed consumption, cost per kilogram of feed, and the weight of the livestock. Good growth does not guarantee maximum profit, but optimal growth coupled with efficient feed conversion and minimal feed costs ensures the highest economic returns (Mariyono et al., 2022).

Hematology parameters

Blood hematology is crucial in determining the health status of livestock. The influence of feeding beer dregs can be observed in Table 3. The results showed that the average hemoglobin level in this study ranged from 10.88 to 12.53 g/dL, the average erythrocyte count ranged from 10.60 to 12.00 × 106/mm³, and the average leukocyte count ranged from 5.62 to 6.74 × 103/mm³. The hematological levels of the sheep are within the normal range.

The hematological values in this research are within the normal range, indicating the safe use of beer waste as feed for maintaining health. Soeharsono et al. (2010) stated that the normal hemoglobin range in sheep is between 11 and 13 g/dL. Hemoglobin levels are influenced by the interaction between treatment (dietary energy and protein balance) and the timing of administration (Lee and Beauchemin, 2014). The results of this study show higher hemoglobin levels compared to Rahayu et al. (2017), which reported ranges of 7.60 to 10.02 g/dL for Garut sheep fed waste feed. This difference may be due to the lower protein content in their diet (approximately 13.63-14.00%) compared to the 15% protein in the diet used in this study, as well as likely differences in iron (Fe) content in the feed. Hemoglobin levels can be influenced by adequate nutrition, especially protein in the diet and its digestibility (Schalm et al., 1986).

 

Table 3: Blood profile of sheep fed beer waste as a substitute in the ration.

Treatment

Hemoglobin

(g/dl)

Erythrocytes (106/mm3 )

Leukocytes

(103/mm3 )

P0 11.47±1.43 11.04±1.08 5.64±1.29
P1 12.53±2.35 11.84±2.09 6.74±0.63
P2 12.22±0.76 12.00±0.65 5.64±0.95
P3 10.88±1.82 10.60±1.42 5.62±1.18

Note: The treatments did not show statistically significant differences (P>0.05) in hemoglobin, erythrocytes, and leukocyte levels of various groups.

The highest average hemoglobin level was observed in sheep from the P1 treatment at 12.53 g/dL, a difference of 1.65 g/dL compared to sheep in the P3 treatment. This suggests differences in the physiological capacity of the animals for the formation and circulation of hemoglobin in erythrocytes throughout the body. The increase in hemoglobin levels is still within normal limits, indicating that the provided feed does not disturb the circulatory system. Hemoglobin levels are influenced not only by sufficient nutrition, particularly protein as a component of hemoglobin, but also by age, gender, and activity (Mushawwir et al., 2017). According to McDowell (1972), animals in tropical regions often experience a decrease in hemoglobin levels, possibly due to mineral deficiencies, heat stress, and the presence of parasites (Baihaqi et al., 2019).

The results showed that the average hemoglobin level in this study ranged from 10.88 to 12.53 g/dL, the average erythrocyte count ranged from 10.60 to 12.00 × 106/mm³, and the average leukocyte count ranged from 5.62 to 6.74 × 103/mm³. These hematological levels are within the normal range for sheep. The normal hematological values observed in this study indicate the safe use of beer waste as a feed ingredient for maintaining health. According to Soeharsono et al. (2010), the normal hemoglobin range in sheep is between 11 and 13 g/dL. Hemoglobin levels can be influenced by the interaction between dietary energy and protein balance, as well as the timing of administration (Lee and Beauchemin, 2014). This study’s hemoglobin levels were higher compared to those reported by Rahayu et al. (2017), which ranged from 7.60 to 10.02 g/dL for Garut sheep fed waste feed. This discrepancy may be due to the lower protein content (approximately 13.63-14.00%) in their diet compared to the 15% protein used in this study, as well as potential differences in iron (Fe) content in the feed. Hemoglobin levels can be affected by adequate nutrition, particularly protein, and its digestibility (Schalm et al., 1986).

The highest average hemoglobin level, observed in sheep from the P1 treatment at 12.53 g/dL, was 1.65 g/dL higher than that in sheep from the P3 treatment. This suggests differences in the physiological capacity of the animals to form and circulate hemoglobin in erythrocytes. Despite the increase, hemoglobin levels remained within normal limits, indicating that the provided feed did not disrupt the circulatory system. Hemoglobin levels are influenced by sufficient nutrition, particularly protein, as well as by age, gender, and activity (Mushawwir et al., 2017). McDowell (1972) noted that animals in tropical regions often experience decreased hemoglobin levels, possibly due to mineral deficiencies, heat stress, and parasitic infections (Baihaqi et al., 2019).

Blood chemistry parameters

One potential feed ingredient for sheep is beer dregs, which offer beneficial nutrients, especially in terms of protein content. Although beer dregs contain some anti-nutritional substances, such as alcohol, the amounts are very low. Typically, the alcohol content is so minimal that it does not produce any alcoholic effects on animals when used as a feed ingredient. Utilizing by-products from the food industry and thinking creatively are effective strategies for reducing pollution from industrial activities (Soceanu et al., 2024). The effects of feeding beer dregs on the blood chemistry parameters of sheep are detailed in Table 4. The data revealed that the average total protein level in this study ranged from 6.92 to 7.23 g/dL, the average blood urea nitrogen ranged from 19.28 to 20.65 mg/dL, and the average creatinine ranged from 0.77 to 0.92 mg/dL. All these blood chemical levels were within the normal range for sheep.

According to Cynthia and Scott (2005), normal total protein levels in sheep are between 5.90 and 7.80 g/dL. In this study, the highest average total protein level was found in sheep from treatment P1 was 7.23 g/dL, which was 0.31 g/dL higher than in sheep from treatment P0. This increase is still within normal limits, suggesting that the provided feed does not negatively affect the circulatory system or overall health. Factors such as age, breed, environmental conditions, and general health can influence total protein levels (Naseri et al., 2016).

The blood urea nitrogen levels observed in this study are also within the normal range, as defined by Wahjuni and Bijanti (2006), which is 6 to 27 mg/dL. This indicates that the inclusion of beer dregs in the diet at various levels does not significantly alter blood urea nitrogen levels. The use of beer dregs in this study is deemed safe, with no adverse effects observed. Elevated blood urea nitrogen levels can be linked to kidney issues like nephritis, leptospirosis, kidney damage, or kidney failure. In chronic kidney disease (CKD), elevated blood urea nitrogen can reflect the buildup of nitrogenous toxins, potentially contributing to anemia (Christopher, 2008). Increased BUN levels can also result from conditions unrelated to the kidneys, such as heart disorders, shock, urinary stones, prostate enlargement, tumors, and congenital abnormalities.

A normal creatinine level indicates that the sheep is healthy and that there are no infections in the organs, including the kidneys. This means that adding beer dregs to the diet at different levels does not significantly affect creatinine levels (Galen et al., 2022). This result is consistent with the study by Agwa et al. (2023), which found that including canola seed meal as a protein source did not significantly alter creatinine levels in female sheep.

The highest average creatinine level was 0.92 mg/dL in sheep from treatment P2, which is 0.15 mg/dL higher than in sheep from treatment P1. This increase is still within normal limits, indicating that the feed does not negatively impact the sheep’s health. According to Kaneko et al. (2008), normal serum creatinine levels for sheep are up to 1.9 mg/dL, so the levels observed in this study are within the expected range. The variations in creatinine levels are not significant.

 

Table 4: Blood chemical profile of sheep fed with beer waste as a substitution in feed.

Variables

Unit

P0

P1

P2

P3

Total protein (g/dL)

6.92+0.82

7.23+1.01

7.17+0.66

7.15+0.80

Blood Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL)

20.65+6.22

19.45+3.46

19.28+2.40

20.32+5.36

Creatinine (mg/dL)

0.83+0.10

0.77+0.08

0.92+0.15

0.78+0.27

Note: The treatments did not show statistically significant differences (P>0.05) in total protein, blood urea nitrogen and creatinine level of sheep of various groups.

Creatinine levels are typically lower than blood urea nitrogen levels because creatinine is more easily excreted. Creatinine is produced from creatine, a compound made by the liver, and then released into the bloodstream. It moves to the muscles, where it is converted into creatine phosphate and eventually metabolized into creatinine (Gounden et al., 2024; Hosten, 1990). Since creatinine levels are closely related to muscle mass, higher muscle mass usually results in higher creatinine levels. This makes creatinine a useful indicator for assessing weight gain in livestock, as muscle mass and body weight are linked to urinary creatinine excretion (Narayan and Appleton, 1980).

Conclusions and Recommendations

The results of the current study showed that feeding up to 15% beer waste does not cause any health disturbances in sheep. Therefore, beer waste, as a high-protein and low-cost feed ingredient, may be used as an alternative feed for animals.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by the Program Kerjasama Penelitian UNISKA–BRIN Tahun 2023, with grant number 010/040.1.6/HK.01.03/VIII/2023.

Novelty Statement

This study explores the use of beer waste as an alternative feed ingredient for sheep, addressing high production costs. It demonstrates that incorporating beer waste up to 15% in rations does not negatively impact the performance or health of thin-tailed sheep, providing a cost-effective, sustainable feeding option with high protein content.

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION

ER, NS, MDF, SRB, FS, RM, ZAB, AM and MS: Designed the study, collected samples and performed examinations. All authors have drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical approval

The study received ethical clearance from the Animal Care and Use Committee at Universitas Brawijaya with the reference number: 207-KEP-UB-2023

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

Adam M, Lubis TM, Abdyad B, Asmilia N, Muttaqien, Fakhrurrazi (2015). Number of rythrocytes and hematocrit values of Acehnese and Balinese cows in leumbah Seulawah District, Aceh Besar Regency. J. Vet. Med., 9(2): 115-118. https://doi.org/10.21157/j.med.vet..v9i2.3810

Adnan A, Iskandar F, Mudawaroch RE (2019). Deferences of leukosit goat etawa (Pe) farming of the heart given padi fermentation with different levels. Surya Agritama, Volume 8, Number 1.

Agwa HMM, Saleh HM, Ayyat MS, Abdel-Rahman GA. (2023). Effect of replacing cottonseed meal with canola meal on growth performance, blood metabolites, thyroid function, and ruminal parameters of growing lambs. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 55: 122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03528-0

Aragão AP, Brust LAC, Galvão A, Caldas SA, Nogueira VA, Santos BBN, França TN, Peixoto PV (2023). ‘Beer yeast’ (liquid brewery waste) for sheep and pig feeding: Epidemiological and clinical aspects of the poisoning, safety margin and prevention. Pesquisa Vet. Brasil., 43: e07112.

Baihaqi ZA, Sofyan A, Suwignyo B, Angeles AA, Widiyono I, Nurcahyo W, Ibrahim A, Putri EM, Wulandari (2024). In vivo study: The effects of Carica pubescens seed extract on the anthelmintic activity, feed digestibility, performance, and clinical parameters of thin-tailed sheep. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 1341: 012119. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1341/1/012119

Baihaqi ZA, Widiyono I, Angeles AA, Suwignyo B, Nurcahyo W (2023). Anthelmintic activity of Carica pubescens aqueous seed extract and its effects on rumen fermentation and methane reduction in Indonesian thin-tailed sheep: An in vitro study. Vet. World, 16(7): 1421-1428. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.1421-1428

Baihaqi ZA, Widiyono I, Nurcahyo W (2019). Prevalence of gastrointestinal worms in Wonosobo and thin tailed sheep on the slop of mount sumbing, Central Java, Indonesia. Vet. World, 12(11): 1866-1871. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1866-1871

Baihaqi ZA, Widiyono I, Nurcahyo W (2020a). Prevalence naturally infected GI parasites and complete blood count condition on Wonosobo sheep at Wonosobo District, Central Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 21(7): 3057-3061. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210724

Baihaqi ZA, Widiyono I, Nurcahyo W (2020b). Potential of Carica pubescens fruit peel as an alternative method to control Haemonchus contortus in small ruminant. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. J., 32(7).

Baihaqi ZA, Widiyono I, Nurcahyo W (2020c). In vitro anthelmintic activity of aqueous and ethanolextract of Paraserianthes falcataria bark waste against Haemonchus contortus obtained from a local slaughter house in Indonesia. Vet. World, 13(8): 1549-1554. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.1549-1554

Baihaqi ZA, Widiyono I, Suwignyo B, Angeles AA (2022). Alternative strategies of plant metabolite secondary Tannin for methane emission reduction on ruminant livestock: A reviews of the last 5 years literature. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 10(3): 599-606. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2022/10.3.599.606

Christopher MM (2008). Erythrocyte survival: Uremia and anemia in chronic kidney disease. J. Vet. Med., 63(1). Corpus ID: 29386357.

Cynthia MK, Scott L (2005). The merck veterinary manual. 9th ed. New Jersey (US): Kahn CM Merck and Co Inc.

Galen GV, Olsen E, Siwinska N (2022). Biomarkers of kidney disease in horses: A review of the current literature. Animals, 12(19): 2678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192678

Gounden V, Bhatt H, Jialal I (2024). Renal function tests. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507821/.

Hosten AO (1990). BUN and Creatinine. In: (eds. H.K. Walker, W.D. Hall, J.W. Hurst). Clinical methods: The history, physical, and laboratory examinations. 3rd edition. Boston: Butterworths; Chapter 193. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK305/.

Kamil KA, Latipudin D, Hernaman I, Dhalika T, Rahmat D, Indriani NP, Rochana A (2020). Effects of protein and energy balance in ration on physiological and hematological status of Garut sheep. J. Biol. Sci., 20: 7–12. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2020.7.12

Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML (2008). Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. 6th ed. Academic, San Diego. pp. 916.

Kenny DA, Fitzsimons C, Waters SM, McGee M (2018). Invited review: Improving feed efficiency of beef cattle the current state of the art and future challenges. Animal, 12: 1815-1826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000976

Lee C, Beauchemin KA (2014). A review of feeding supplementary nitrate to ruminant animals: Nitrate toxicity, methane emissions, and production performance. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 94: 557-570. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas-2014-069

Lisnanti EF, Lokapirnasari WP, Hestianah EP, Al-Arif MA, Baihaqi ZA (2023). The effectiveness of giving marsh fleabane (Pluchea indica L.) water extract on broiler hematology and blood glucose. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 11(8): 1348-1356. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2023/11.8.1348.1356

Lokapirnasari WP, Al-Arif MA, Hidayatik N, Safiranisa A, Arumdani DF, Zahirah AI, Yulianto AB, Lamid M, Marbun TD, Lisnanti EF, Baihaqi ZA, Khairullah AR, Kurniawan SC, Pelawi EBS, Hasib A (2024). Effect of probiotics and acidifiers on feed intake, egg mass, production performance, and egg yolk chemical composition in late-laying quails. Vet. World, 17(2): 462–469. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2024.462-469

Mariyono Y, Anggraeny N, Antari R, Krishna NH, Sukmasari PK, Putri AS (2022). Feed intake and feed conversion ratio of ongole crossbred cattle fattened at different ages and feed in 3rd International Conference on Advance and Scientific Innovation ICASI Life Sciences Chapter, KnE Life Sciences, pp. 348–358.

Mcdowell RE (1972). Improvement of livestock production in warm climates. Improving Livest Production Warm Climate.

Mushawwir A, Tanuwiria UH, Kamil KA, Adriani L, Wiradimadja R (2017). Effects of volatile oil of garlic on feed utilization, blood biochemistry and performance of heat-stressed Japanese quail. Asian J. Poult. Sci., 11: 83-89. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2017.83.89

Mussatto SI (2014). Brewer’s spent grain: A valuable feedstock for industrial applications. J. Sci. Food Agric., 94(7): 1264-1275. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6486

Naik B, Kumar V, Rizwanuddin S, Chauhan C, Gupta AK, Rustagi S, Kumar V, Gupta S (2023). Agro-industrial waste: A cost-effective and eco-friendly substrate to produce amylase. Food Prod. Process. Nutr., 5(30). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-023-00143-2

Narayan S, Appleton HD (1980). Creatinin: A review. Clin. Chem., 26(8): 1119-1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/26.8.1119

Naseri MS, Mohebbi MF, Syarifi K (2016). Hematological and biochemical reference intervals for Iranian fat-tailed sheep. Vet. Clin. Pathol., 45(2): 247-253.

Oonincx DG, Van Broekhoven S, Van Huis A, Van Loon JJ (2015). Feed conversion, survival and development, and composition of four insect species on diets composed of food by-products. PLoS One, 10(12): e0144601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144601

Prasetyo EN, Rokana E, Baihaqi ZA, Samudi S (2024). Anthelmintic effects of Podang mango (Mangifera indica) fruit peel waste extract through in vivo application on Indonesian Etawa goat production and health. Vet. World, 17(6): 1291-1298. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2024.1291-1298

Prayudi SKA, Effendi MH, Lukiswanto BS, Az Zah-Ra RL, Benjamin MI, Kurniawan SC, Khairullah AR, Silaen OSM, Lisnanti EF, Baihaqi ZA, Widodo A, Riwu KHPJ (2023). Detection of genes on Escherichia coli producing extended spectrum β-lactamase Isolated from the small intestine of ducks in traditional markets Surabaya City, Indonesia. J. Adv. Vet. Res., 13(8): 1600-1608.

Rahayu S, Yamin M, Sumantri C, Astuti DA (2017). Blood haematological profile and metabolite status of garut lamb fed diets mung bean sprout waste in the morning or evening. J. Vet., 18: 234-241. https://doi.org/10.19087/jveteriner.2017.18.1.38

Ran T, Jin L, Abeynayake R, Saleem AM, Zhang X, Niu D, Chen L, Yang W (2021). Effects of brewers’ spent grain protein hydrolysates on gas production, ruminal fermentation characteristics, microbial protein synthesis and microbial community in an artificial rumen fed a high grain diet. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00531-5

Rokana E, Fatimah IR, Dianingtyas BD, Hasanah N, Wulandari, Baihaqi ZA (2024). Impact of various fiber sources in ration formulas on feedlot performance of sheep in Indonesia. J. Anim. Health Prod., 12(3): 325-330. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2024/12.3.325.330

Sakti AA, Baihaqi ZA, Suwignyo B, Sofyan A, Herdian H, Kustantinah (2024). Anthelmintic activity of red macroalgae Acrocystis sp. and Acanthophora sp. etanolic extract against Haemonchus contortus in sheep in vitro. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 1360: 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1360/1/012004

Schalm CM, Jain NC, Carrol EJ (1986). Veterinary hematology. 4th Ed. ML scott and associatation, ithaca, New York.

Scott AS, Elizabeth F (2009). Body structure and function. Eleventh Edition. United States of America: Delmar.

Soceanu A, Dobrinas S, Popescu V, Buzatu A, Sirbu A (2024). Sustainable strategies for the recovery and valorization of brewery by-products. A multidisciplinary approach. Sustainability, 16: 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010220

Soeharsono L, Hernawan E, Adriani L, Kamil KA (2010). Animal physiology: Basic phenomena, functions and interactions of organs in animals. Widya Padjadjaran, Bandung.

Stahn T, Storandt R, Grebenteuch S, Rohn S, May D, Dolsdorf C, Pleissner D (2023). Utilization of brewer’s spent grains and agricultural residues in pig feed formation. Sustainability, 15(18): 13774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813774

Suwignyo B, Baihaqi ZA, Utomo R, Sarmin, Widiyono I (2017). Effects of different feed restrictions on Kacang goats. Pak. J. Nutr., 16: 236-241. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.236.241

Tongtong D, Jian W, Dong D, Xuejing Y, Cheng Z, Yushan J, Tao S (2022). Effects of brewers’ spent grains on fermentation quality, chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of mixed silage prepared with corn stalk, dried apple pomace and sweet potato vine. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 21(1): 198-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2021.2022994

Wahjuni RS, Bijanti R (2006). Test of the side effects of complete feed formula on liver and kidney function of Holstein Friesian cattle calves. J. Vet. Med., 22(3): 174–178.

Wang Y, Yuan Z, Tang Y (2021). Enhancing food security and environmental sustainability: A critical review of food loss and waste management. Resour. Environ. Sustain., 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100023

Wen C, Zhang J, Duan Y, Zhang H, Ma H (2019). A mini-review on brewer’s spent grain protein: Isolation, physicochemical properties, application of protein, and functional properties of hydrolysates. J. Food Sci., 84(12): 3330-3340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14906

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

October

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56, Iss. 5, pp. 2001-2500

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe