Antibiotic Resistance and Adhesive Antigen of Escherichia coli Isolated from Pigs in Farm and Slaughterhouse in Hau Giang Province, Vietnam
Special Issue:
Emerging and Re-Emerging Animal Health Challenges in Low and Middle-Income Countries
Antibiotic Resistance and Adhesive Antigen of Escherichia coli Isolated from Pigs in Farm and Slaughterhouse in Hau Giang Province, Vietnam
Nguyen Khanh Thuan1*, Bui Thi Le Minh1, Ngo Van Thong1,2, Nguyen Ho Thanh Tuyen1, Nguyen Lam Truong1, Pham Minh Thien1
1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture, Can Tho University, 3/2 Street, Xuan Khanh Ward, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City 90000, Vietnam; 2Faculty of Agriculture and Rural Development, Kien Giang University, Chau Thanh District, Kien Giang Province 91000, Vietnam
Abstract | A total of 42 Escherichia coli (E. coli)-suspected fecal samples were collected from high density swine farms and slaughterhouse to ascertain positivity, examine antimicrobial susceptibility, prevalence of antibiotic-resistance genes, and adhesive antigens. The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility test using the disc diffusion method indicated that those E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces were significantly resistant to ampicillin (61.30%, 81.81%), followed by streptomycin (54.84%, 63.64%). However, those E. coli strains were still sensitive to some of the antibiotics, especially ofloxacin (100%). A total of 71.43% of E. coli strains depicted resistance against multiple antibiotics, and the resistant pattern of ampicillin and streptomycin was the most predominant. Detection and confirmation by PCR assay revealed that blaampC antibiotic-resistance gene was the most abundant resistant marker in the analyzed E. coli strains with 83.87% and 81.81% detection rate in the farm and slaughterhouse, respectively. However, mcr-1 gene was not detected in E. coli strains in the slaughterhouse. A total of 54.76% of E. coli strains isolated from fecal samples in the farm and the slaughterhouse harbored multiple antibiotic-resistance genes. Adhesive-antigen genes of E. coli strains were detected by PCR, and only F18 (23.81%) and F41 (21.43%) genes were found in those evaluated strains. These results indicated that E. coli strains isolated from fecal samples of pigs in the small-scale farm and slaughterhouse harbored diverse antibiotic-resistance and adhesive-antigen genes, causing threats to animal and human health.
Keywords | Adhesive antigen, Antibiotic resistance, E. coli, Pigs, Slaughterhouse, Small-scale farm
Received | August 13, 2024; Accepted | October 11, 2024; Published | October 21, 2024
*Correspondence | Nguyen Khanh Thuan, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture, Can Tho University, 3/2 Street, Xuan Khanh Ward, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City 90000, Vietnam; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Thuan NK, Minh BTL, Thong NV, Tuyen NHT, Truong NL, Thien PM (2024). Antibiotic resistance and adhesive antigen of Escherichia coli isolated from pigs in farm and slaughterhouse in Hau Giang Province, Vietnam. J. Anim. Health Prod.12(s1): 15-22.
DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2024/12.s1.15.22
ISSN (Online) | 2308-2801
Copyright: 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
Escherichia coli (E. coli) is one of the severe foodborne pathogens that cause diseases in animals and humans (Smith and Fratamico, 2018; Lateif et al., 2024). It can survive in the intestines of animals and can transmit to other animals and humans via direct or indirect contact with their feces (Ercumen et al., 2017). In the Mekong Delta Vietnam, especially in Hau Giang province, there is a high density of swine farming (Thanh Duong and Can, 2005). However, it is primarily small-scale farms with unguaranteed hygiene. Therefore, it possesses an infectious risk of E. coli transmission on farms and humans (Ferens and Hovde, 2011; Abdalla et al., 2022; Utama et al., 2023). Moreover, unsanitary slaughtering processes at slaughterhouses have been identified as the source of bacterial contamination that causes food poisoning for consumers, especially E. coli. Research in the UK has confirmed that slaughtering is essential in determining the quality of meat and the product before processing or distributing it to sales units and consumers (Wei, 2013).
On the other hand, pathogenic E. coli strains are likely to possess one or more types of adhesion antigens. Adhesion antigens are essential factors of E. coli strains that cause gastrointestinal diseases. Based on the adhesion factors on the bacterial surface, such as F4, F5, F6, F17, F18, and F41, E. coli can attach and infect the host’s small intestine to elicit diseases (Pabón-Rodríguez et al., 2023). When examining pigs with post-weaning diarrhea in Europe, Luppi et al. (2016) reported that the prevalence of fimbriae among E. coli isolates was F4 (45.1 %), F18 (33.9 %), F5 (0.6 %), F6 (0.6 %), F41 (0.3 %). E. coli strains carrying genes encoding these adhesion factors can be transmitted and cause human disease through contaminated food sources (Frömmel et al., 2013). In addition, antibiotic-resistant E. coli strains in farms and slaughterhouses are also a matter of concern. According to research on antibiotic resistance of Enterobacteriaceae in wastewater at livestock and poultry slaughterhouses in Germany, the rate of multidrug-resistant E. coli accounted for 57.00% in pig slaughterhouses (Homeier-Bachmann et al., 2021). The study by Santos et al. (2022) at a pig slaughterhouse in Brazil also showed that isolated E. coli strains were resistant to 12 out of 13 tested antibiotics, including ampicillin and chloramphenicol (95.20%), amoxicillin (85.80%), streptomycin and tetracycline (80.95%). Drug-resistant E. coli in slaughterhouses will become a source of drug resistance, spreading to the environment and consumers along the meat distribution chain, causing a significant impact on the treatment of veterinary and human diseases (Wolny-Koładka and Lenart-Boron, 2016). Additionally, Ketkhao et al. (2021) have found that E. coli isolated from pig feces samples from piglets, fattening pigs, and finishing pigs in Thailand had the highest resistance rate to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (53.90%) and colistin (48.50%). The study also showed high resistance rates to colistin in two intensive pig farms supplemented with colistin in feed at 84.60% and 58.10%, respectively. Therefore, the prevalence of E. coli strains harbors adhesive antigens, and antibiotic-resistance ability is required to prevent disease outbreaks in pigs and humans.
Therefore, this study aims to determine the prevalence of adhesive antigens and antibiotic resistance genes in those E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces in the representative small-scale farm and slaughterhouse in Hau Giang province of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. It provides epidemiological information on controlling and preventing diseases caused by E. coli in pigs and humans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The E. coli strains used in this study
This study used 42 E. coli strains isolated from healthy pigs’ feces, including three small-scale farms (n=31) and a slaughterhouse (n=11) in Hau Giang province of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, in December 2023. The farms and a slaughterhouse were in Long My town of Hau Giang province, where the finishing pigs from those farms and others were slaughtered at the examined slaughterhouse. Those samples were collected from different pigs simultaneously in the farms and the slaughterhouse.
Those E. coli strains were isolated from healthy pigs’ feces and identified by biochemical tests following the guidelines of Barrow and Feltham (2003). These strains were kept at -80 oC in the Veterinary Food Hygiene Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture, Can Tho University, Vietnam.
The antimicrobial susceptibility of E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces
Forty-two E. coli strains were examined for the antimicrobial susceptibility of seven antibiotics using the Kirby-Bauer diffusion method (Bauer et al., 1966) and compared to CLSI Standards (2022). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 served as the quality control. Those strains which showed intermediate susceptibility were classified as susceptible strains.
This study used antibiotic discs, including ampicillin (Am, 10 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (Ac, 20/10 μg), colistin (Co, 10 μg), streptomycin (Sm, 10 μg), tetracycline (Te, 30 µg), ofloxacin (Of, 5 µg), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Bt, 1.25/23.75 μg) supplied by Nam Khoa Biotek Ltd. (Vietnam). Those antibiotics were selected depending on the current use of antibiotics in those farms and previous reports in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.
Prevalence of antibiotic-resistance genes in E. coli isolated from pigs’ feces
Forty-two E. coli strains were examined for antimicrobial susceptibility and used to detect antibiotic-resistance gene prevalence. The DNA of those E. coli strains was extracted using the heat-shock method (Ahmed and Dablool, 2017) and stored at -20oC for use in this experiment.
The PCR reaction used Mastermix 2X (Bioline, Canada) in a total of 25 µL: Mastermix 2X (12.5 µl), forward primer (0.5 µl), reverse primer (0.5 µL), distilled water (9.5 µL), and DNA template (2.0 µL).
The antibiotic-resistance genes were detected due to the antibiotic classes used in the antimicrobial susceptibility test, including β-lactam (blaampC), tetracycline (tetA), aminoglycoside (aadA1), polymyxin (mcr-1), sulfonamide (sulII), and quinolone (qnrA). The primer sequences and PCR conditions were conducted following the guidelines for blaampC (Caroff et al., 1999), tetA (Randall et al., 2004), aadA1 (Randall et al., 2004), mcr-1 (Wu et al., 2021), sulII (Saenz et al., 2010), and qnrA (Cattoir and Nordmann, 2009). In this study, the negative control was distilled water, while the positive controls were E. coli strains, which harbored these genes, isolated from domestic animals previously in the Mekong Delta.
Prevalence of adhesive antigens in E. coli isolated from pigs’ feces
Forty-two E. coli strains were continuously examined to detect five genes encoding for adhesive antigens, including F4, F5, F6, F18, and F41. The PCR assays were conducted following similar steps to detect antibiotic-resistance genes. The primer sequences and PCR conditions were performed following the guidelines for F4, F6, and F18 (Boerlin et al., 2005), F5 (Ojeniyi et al., 1994), and F41 (Franck et al., 1998). In this study, the negative control was distilled water, while the positive controls were E. coli strains, which harbored these genes, isolated from pigs previously in the Mekong Delta.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was used to clarify the difference in the rate of antibiotic resistance of E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces and antibiotic resistance and adhesive antigens among those strains. The Chi-square method was used at the significance rate of 95% in the Minitab 17.0 software.
RESULTS and Discussion
The antimicrobial susceptibility results of E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces indicated that those E. coli strains were mainly resistant to ampicillin and streptomycin at 66.67% and 57.14%, respectively (Table 1). Those E. coli strains in the farms were resistant to ampicillin and streptomycin at 61.30% and 54.84%, while the E. coli strains in the slaughterhouse were resistant to these antibiotics at 81.81% and 63.64%.
There was no significant difference in the rate of antibiotic resistance of those E. coli strains between the farms and the slaughterhouse (P>0.05); however, the rate of E. coli resistance to colistin in the slaughterhouse was higher than that in the farms (P<0.05). No E. coli strains showed resistance to ofloxacin in this study.
A total of 71.43% of E. coli strains showed multiple resistance to two to six examined antibiotics. Among resistance patterns, the Am+Sm (ampicillin + streptomycin) pattern was the most popular in E. coli strains isolated from farms and a slaughterhouse, at 29.03% and 18.18%, respectively (Table 2, Figure 1).
Table 1: The antibiotic resistance of E. coli isolated from pigs’ feces on the farms and the slaughterhouse
Antibiotics |
Small-scale farms (n=31) |
Slaughterhouse (n=11) |
Total (n=42) |
|||
No. of strains |
Percentage (%) |
No. of strains |
Percentage (%) |
No. of strains |
Percentage (%) |
|
Ampicillin | 19 | 61.30 | 9 | 81.81 | 28 | 66.67 |
Amoxicillin/Clav. acid | 6 | 19.35 | 4 | 36.36 | 10 | 23.81 |
Streptomycin | 17 | 54.84 | 7 | 63.64 | 24 | 57.14 |
Tetracycline | 7 | 22.58 | 3 | 27.27 | 10 | 23.81 |
Colistin | 5 | 16.13 | 5 | 45.45 | 10 | 23.81 |
Ofloxacin | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
Bactrim | 8 | 25.80 | 5 | 45.45 | 13 | 30.95 |
No: number; clav. Acid: clavulanic acid; Bactrim: sulfamethoxazole/ trimethoprim
Table 2: Multiple antibiotic-resistant patterns of E. coli isolated from pigs’ feces.
No. of resistant antibiotics |
Patterns |
No. of strains |
Percentage |
Small-scale farm (n=31) |
|||
2 | Am+Sm | 9 | 29.03 |
Am+Ac | 2 | 6.45 | |
Sm+Bt | 2 | 6.45 | |
3 | Am+Te+Sm | 3 | 9.67 |
Ac+Sm+Co | 3 | 9.67 | |
4 | Am+Ac+Sm+Bt | 2 | 6.45 |
Subtotal | 21 | 67.74 | |
Slaughterhouse (n=11) | |||
2 | Am+Sm | 2 | 18.18 |
Am+Co+Te | 1 | 9.09 | |
3 | Am+Sm+Ac | 1 | 9.09 |
Am+Bt+Co | 1 | 9.09 | |
4 | Am+Sm+Te+Ac | 1 | 9.09 |
Am+Co+Sm+Ac | 1 | 9.09 | |
5 | Am+Co+Sm+Te+Ac | 1 | 9.09 |
6 | Am+Bt+Co+Sm+Te+Ac | 1 | 9.09 |
Subtotal | 9 | 81.81 | |
Total | 30 | 71.43 |
No: number; ampicillin (Am), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (Ac), colistin (Co), streptomycin (Sm), tetracycline (Te), ofloxacin (Of), trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (Bt)
The PCR results revealed that E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces on farms and in a slaughterhouse could harbor most of the examined antibiotic-resistance genes. Among genes, blaampC was the most frequently detected in E. coli strains on farms and a slaughterhouse at 83.87% and 81.81%, followed by tetA at 80.65% and 45.45%, respectively. However, gene mcr-1 was not detected in E. coli strains in the slaughterhouse (Table 3, Figure 2). In this study, most antibiotic-resistance genes (tetA, aadA1, mcr-1, sulII) were found in E. coli strains isolated from the farms higher than that in the slaughterhouse (P<0.05), except blaampC and qnrA (P>0.05).
Table 3: The prevalence of antibiotic-resistance genes Cdetected in E. coli isolated from pigs’ feces.
Genes |
Small-scale farms (n=31) |
Slaughterhouse (n=11) |
Total (n=42) |
|||
No. of positive strains |
Percentage (%) |
No. of positive strains |
Percentage (%) |
No. of positive strains |
Percentage (%) |
|
blaampC | 26 | 83.87 | 9 | 81.81 | 35 | 83.33 |
aadA1 | 17 | 54.84 | 2 | 18.18 | 19 | 45.24 |
tetA | 25 | 80.65 | 5 | 45.45 | 30 | 71.43 |
mcr-1 | 5 | 16.13 | 0 | 0.00 | 5 | 11.90 |
qnrA | 5 | 16.13 | 1 | 9.09 | 6 | 14.29 |
sulII | 18 | 58.06 | 2 | 18.18 | 20 | 47.62 |
No: number.
Table 4: Patterns of multiple antibiotic-resistance genes in E. coli isolated from pigs’ feces.
No. of antibiotic resistance genes |
Pattern |
No. of strains |
Percentage |
Small-scale farm (n=31) |
|||
2 | blaampC+tetA | 4 | 12.09 |
blaampC+aadA1 | 1 | 3.23 | |
blaampC+sulII | 1 | 3.23 | |
tetA+sulII + qnrA | 2 | 6.45 | |
3 | blaampC+aadA1+tetA | 1 | 3.23 |
blaampC+tetA+sulII | 1 | 3.23 | |
blaampC+aadA1+sulII | 1 | 3.23 | |
tetA+aadA1+sulII | 2 | 6.45 | |
4 | blaampC+tetA+aadA1+sulII | 1 | 3.23 |
blaampC+tetA+mcr-1+sulII | 2 | 6.45 | |
5 | blaampC+tetA+aadA1+mcr-1+sulII + qnrA | 1 | 3.23 |
Subtotal | 17 | 54.84 | |
Slaughterhouse (n=11) | |||
2 | blaampC + tetA | 1 | 9.09 |
blaampC + aadA1 | 1 | 9.09 | |
blaampC + sulII | 1 | 9.09 | |
tetA+sulII + qnrA | 1 | 9.09 | |
3 | blaampC+tetA+aadA1 | 1 | 9.09 |
blaampC+tetA+sulII | 1 | 9.09 | |
Subtotal | 6 | 54.55 | |
Total | 23 | 54.76 |
No: number
54.76% of E. coli strains could harbor multiple antibiotic-resistance genes from two to five genes with diverse gene patterns, and blaampC was present in most of the patterns. One E. coli strain was isolated from pigs’ feces in the farms harboring 5/6 examined genes (Table 4).
Among the adhesive antigens examined, F18 and F41 were found in those E. coli strains at 23.81% and 21.43%, respectively. The adhesive antigens of F4, F5, and F6 were not detected in those E. coli strains. F41 (29.03%) was found frequently in E. coli strains on farms, followed by F18 (3.23%). F18 (81.82%) was only found in isolated E. coli strains in the slaughterhouse (Table 5).
Table 5: Prevalence of adhesive-antigen genes in E. coli isolated from pigs’ feces.
Adhesive antigens |
Small-scale farm (n=31) |
Slaughterhouse (n=11) |
Total (n=42) |
|||||
No. of positive strains |
Percentage |
No. of positive strains |
Percentage |
No. of positive strains |
Percentage |
|||
F4 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||
F5 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||
F6 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||
F18 | 1 | 3.23 | 9 | 81.82 | 10 | 23.81 | ||
F41 | 9 | 29.03 | 0 | 0.00 | 9 | 21.43 |
No: number.
Escherichia coli is one of the severe pathogens causing diseases in animals and humans. Antibiotics, used to treat or prevent diseases, intend to increase antibiotic resistance in bacteria, including E. coli (MacGowan and Macnaughton, 2017). In this study, although those E. coli strains were still susceptible to most examined antibiotics, those strains exhibited high rates of resistance to ampicillin and streptomycin. These antibiotics have been frequently used to treat pigs’ diseases on the farms for a long time in our survey. This might be a reason for the formation of the resistance of E. coli to these antibiotics. Strom et al. (2017) noted that multidrug resistance in E. coli strains isolated from pigs was more common on medium-sized farms than on small-sized farms. In addition, E. coli can be resistant to multiple antibiotics, mainly due to the overuse of antibiotics in animal husbandry. Fairbrother and Nadeau (2006) stated that the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains is a problem caused by many factors, possibly due to the inappropriate use of antibiotics in treatment or as supplements in animal feed. Research by Liu et al. (2022) demonstrated that the antibiotic resistance of pig-derived E. coli was varied and multi-drug resistant, with the highest resistance to six antibiotics being 26.35%. The isolated strains were resistant to tetracyclines, penicillin, and chloramphenicol, which were commonly used for disease prevention in pig farms, and less resistant to quinolones and aminoglycosides, which are not used in pig farms in Bejing, China.
On the other hand, the high resistance of E. coli strains to antibiotics in the slaughterhouse could be due to several reasons. The unhygienic slaughter environment could be a source of storing and spreading resistant E. coli strains from pigs’ feces and digestive tract substances or be contaminated by pigs imported from different sources. Wang et al. (2021) indicated that the hygiene of slaughterhouses was an essential issue causing E. coli contamination in the pig slaughtering process in China. In Hau Giang province, the examined slaughterhouse was a medium-sized semi-industrial type, and most of the process steps were done by humans. Thus, E. coli contamination from pigs’ feces could occur during slaughtering. The reports of E. coli isolated from pig slaughterhouses were resistant to many antibiotics, such as 100.00% to streptomycin in Indonesia (Sudarwanto et al., 2017) or oxytetracycline (64.00%), followed by streptomycin, sulphonamide, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, ceftiofur, amoxicillin clavulanic acid, aztreonam, and nitrofurantoin in the United Kingdom (Yang et al., 2020).
This study also showed that E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces in Hau Giang province showed multidrug resistance. This phenomenon could be due to the use of antibiotics on farms or contamination from the diverse origin of pigs’ feces in the slaughterhouse. In this study, those E. coli strains frequently resisted ampicillin and streptomycin. This could be proof of the resistance of E. coli strains linked to the long-term use of those antibiotics for domestic animals in the examined region. There is a direct relationship between antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use (Varga et al., 2009). In China, the reports of antibiotic-resistance E. coli showed that 80.67% of E. coli strains isolated from the pig slaughterhouses were multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains multidrug resistance (Fang et al., 2018), and 91% of isolates resistant to crucial drugs, including colistin, carbapenems, and tigecycline in pig farms (Peng et al., 2022). In Thailand, the antibiograms of amoxicillin-trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, amoxicillin-doxycillin-trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, amoxicillin-gentamycin-trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole, and amoxicillin-doxycillin-gentamycin-trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole were found frequently in multidrug-resistance E. coli isolated in pig farms (Mitchaothai and Srikijkasemwat, 2021).
The present study showed that E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces could harbor diverse antibiotic-resistance genes. Compared to the antimicrobial susceptibility test results, the prevalence of examined antibiotic-resistance genes was consistent. Gene blaampC and aadA1 encoding for resistance of β-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics, respectively, were highly detected in those E. coli strains in this study. Moreover, those E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces on the farms and the slaughterhouse also harbored multiple antibiotic-resistance genes; gene blaampC was found in most of the patterns. The patterns’ results also reflected the consistency of the antimicrobial susceptibility test and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistance genes in case of resistance to ampicillin with streptomycin popularly. It indicated that these genes were related to the antimicrobial susceptibility of E. coli strains to ampicillin and streptomycin. Conversely, although tetracycline and bactrim had low resistance in the antimicrobial susceptibility test, genes tetA and sulII were detected to be relatively high in those E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces on the farms and the slaughterhouse in Hau Giang province. It revealed that other factors could also affect the antibiotic-resistance expression of E. coli strains. Several antibiotic-resistant genes are considered silent resistance genes, which are not expressed frequently or at low levels, even when exposed to antibiotics (Stasiak et al., 2021). Poirel et al. (2018) have found that the number of antibiotic resistance genes is increasing due to the horizontal and vertical transfer of antibiotic resistance genes among Enterobacteria, in which E. coli takes a role as a donor and recipient of antibiotic resistance genes; thus, it can acquire antibiotic resistance genes from other bacteria but can also transfer its antibiotic resistance genes to other bacteria. According to Mazurek et al. (2018), a study on the complexity of antibiotic resistance of E. coli in the city of Zielona Góra, Poland, also showed that E. coli isolated from pig feces had the presence of tetA (54.00%) and sulII (45.00%). In pig farms in Brazil, most E. coli strains are resistant to antimicrobials and carry genes of resistance to quinolones, fluoroquinolones, and ESBLs, and because of that, these findings are essential for public health (Brisola et al., 2019). In Thailand, multidrug-resistant (MDR) E. coli was found in a high proportion of fecal samples isolated from diarrheic piglets from pig farms in Thailand, and several isolates harbored colistin-resistance genes mcr-1 and mcr-3. Moreover, it provides informative scientific evidence regarding bacterial antibiotic resistance in pig farms and raises public health awareness regarding transmitting antibiotic-resistance genes from animals to humans (Nguyet et al., 2022). Thus, the management of using antibiotics on farms is essential to prevent the presence and spreading of antibiotic-resistant E. coli strains in the husbandry environment and slaughterhouses.
In this study, E. coli strains were isolated from healthy pigs; thus, the prevalence of adhesive antigens required to penetrate and cause diseases was low. However, the presence of F18 and F41 in E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces on the farms was more frequent than in the slaughterhouse. Those E. coli strains could be infected among pigs on farms, while those E. coli strains in the slaughterhouse could be contaminated from the slaughtering process. Although that, the prevalence of F18 and F4 indicated that pathogenic E. coli strains have survived in pigs on the farms and the slaughterhouse. If those pathogenic E. coli strains were transmitted to pigs on the farms or contaminated on porks to consumers, they could cause severe diseases. Dubreuil et al. (2016) indicated that the presence of adhesive antigens, including F4, F5, F6, F18, and F41, could increase the severity of diseases in animals. The F18 Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) could severely impact piglets’ growth performance, intestinal function, and immune responses (Becker et al., 2020), while E. coli F41 strains were mainly found in human gastroenteritis cases in Qatar (Peters et al., 2019). Therefore, the prevalence of pathogenic E. coli on farms and slaughterhouses is requested to prevent diseases in animals and humans.
CONCLUSIONS and Recommendations
The E. coli strains isolated from pigs’ feces on the farms and the slaughterhouse in Hau Giang province, Vietnam, showed a relatively high rate of antibiotic resistance, especially resistance to β-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics used frequently in swine production there. Moreover, those E. coli strains also harbored many antibiotic-resistance genes with several patterns and pathogenic adhesive antigens. It indicated a potential risk for causing diseases in pigs and humans and difficulty in the treatments. Further research should be conducted to clarify the overview of antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity of E. coli isolated from pigs on farms and slaughterhouses; then, a comprehensive approach can be applied to protect animals’ and humans’ health in this region.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Department of Veterinary, Animal Husbandry, and Fishery in Hau Giang province, Can Tho University, and Kien Giang University, Vietnam, for cooperating to conduct this study.
Novelty Statement
Escherichia coli is one of the most pathogenic bacteria that causes diseases and failure treatments in animals and humans, especially antibiotic-resistant strains. Moreover, E. coli can be transmitted via food products like pork or indirect or direct contact with pigs’ feces. The unhygienic conditions of farms and slaughterhouses are potentially causing infection between animals and humans. Research on antibiotic resistance and adhesive genes in E. coli isolated from pigs in farms and slaughterhouses is essential to evaluate the risk and protect animal and human health, particularly foodborne diseases.
AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION
Nguyen Khanh Thuan, Bui Thi Le Minh, and Ngo Van Thong conceptualized, designed, and supervised the research. Nguyen Khanh Thuan critically reviewed the study. Nguyen Ho Thanh Tuyen, Nguyen Lam Truong, and Pham Minh Thien collected samples and processed the data. Nguyen Khanh Thuan, Bui Thi Le Minh, and Ngo Van Thong analyzed and interpreted the data generated. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Abdalla SE, Abia AL, Amoako DG, Perrett K, Bester LA, Essack SY (2022). Food animals as reservoirs and potential sources of multidrug-resistant diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes: Focus on intensive pig farming in South Africa. Onderstepoort. J. Vet. Res., 89(1): 1963. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v89i1.1963
Ahmed OB, Dablool AS (2017). Quality improvement of the DNA extracted by boiling method in gram negative bacteria. Int. J. Bioass., 6(4): 5347-5349. https://doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2017.04.004
Barrow GI, Feltham RKA (2003). Cowan and Steel’s manual for identification of medical bacteria, 3rd (ed). Cambridge Press.
Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 45(4): 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493
Becker SL, Li Q, Burrough ER, Kenne D, Sahin O, Gould SA, Patience JF (2020). Effects of an F18 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli challenge on growth performance, immunological status, and gastrointestinal structure of weaned pigs and the potential protective effect of direct-fed microbial blends. J. Anim. Sci., 98(5): skaa113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa113
Boerlin P, Travis R, Gyles CI, Reid-Smith R, Lim NJH, Nicholson V, McEwen SA, Friendship R, Archambault M (2005). Antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes of Escherichia coli isolates from swine in Ontario. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71: 6753-6761. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.6753-6761.2005
Brisola MC, Crecencio RB, Bitner DS, Frigo A, Rampazzo L, Stefani LM, Faria GA (2019). Escherichia coli is used as a biomarker of antimicrobial resistance in pig farms in Southern Brazil. Sci. Total Environ., 647: 362-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.438
Caroff N, Espaze E, Berard I, Richet H, Reynaud A (1999). Mutations in the ampC promoter of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to oxyiminocephalosporins without extended spectrum β-lactamase production. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 173(2): 459-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13539.x
Cattoir V, Nordmann P (2009). Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in gram-negative bacterial species: An update. Curr. Med. Chem., 16(8): 1028-1046. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986709787581879
CLSI (2022). Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 32nd edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, Pennsylvania.
Dubreuil JD, Isaacson RE, Schifferli DM (2016). Animal enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. EcoSal Plus, 7(1): 10-1128. https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0006-2016
Ercumen A, Pickering AJ, Kwong LH, Arnold BF, Parvez SM, Alam M, Sen D, Islam S, Kullmann C, Chase C, Ahmed R (2017). Animal feces contribute to domestic fecal contamination: evidence from E. coli measured in water, hands, food, flies, and soil in Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Technol., 51(15): 8725-8734. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01710
Fairbrother JM, Nadeau E (2006). Escherichia coli: On-farm contamination of animals. Rev. Sci. Tech., 25(2): 555-569. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.25.2.1682
Fang J, Shen Y, Qu D, Han J (2018). Antimicrobial resistance profiles and characteristics of integrons in Escherichia coli strains isolated from a large-scale centralized swine slaughterhouse and its downstream markets in Zhejiang, China. Food Contr., 95: 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.08.003
Ferens WA, Hovde CJ (2011). Escherichia coli O157: H7: Animal reservoir and sources of human infection. Foodborne Pathog. Dis., 8(4): 465-487. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0673
Franck SM, Bosworth BT, Moon HW (1998). Multi-plex PCR for enterotoxigenic, attaching and effacing, and shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains from calves. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36: 1795-1797. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.36.6.1795-1797.1998
Frömmel U, Lehmann W, Rödiger S, Böhm A, Nitschke J, Weinreich J, Groß J, Roggenbuck D, Zinke O, Ansorge H, Vogel S, Klemm P, Wex T, Schröder C, Wieler LH, Schierack P (2013). Adhesion of human and animal Escherichia coli strains in association with their virulence-associated genes and phylogenetic origins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 79(19): 5814-5829. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01384-13
Homeier-Bachmann T, Heiden SE, Lübcke PK, Bachmann L, Bohnert JA, Zimmermann D, Schaufler K (2021). Antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in wastewater of abattoirs. Antibiotics, 10(5): 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050568
Ketkhao P, Thongratsakul S, Poolperm P, Poolkhet C, Amavisit P (2021). Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Escherichia coli from swine farms using different antimicrobials and management systems. Vet. World, 14(3): 689-695. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.689-695
Lateif BM, Ahmed JA, Najem HA (2024). Genotypic characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from infected chicken in Basrah, Iraq. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 14(1): 29-39. https://doi.org/10.51227/ojafr.2024.4
Liu X, Liu Q, Cheng Y, Liu R, Zhao R, Wang J, Wang Y, Yang S, Chen A (2022). Effect of bacterial resistance of Escherichia coli from swine in large-scale pig farms in Beijing. Front. Microbiol., 13: 820833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.820833
Luppi A, Gibellini M, Gin T, Vangroenweghe F, Vandenbroucke V, Bauerfeind R, Bonilauri P, Labarque G, Hidalgo Á (2016). Prevalence of virulence factors in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from pigs with post-weaning diarrhoea in Europe. Porc. Health Manage., 2: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0039-9
MacGowan A, Macnaughton E (2017). Antibiotic resistance. Medicine, 45(10): 622-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2017.07.006
Mazurek J, Bok E, Baldy-Chudzik K (2018). Complexity of antibiotic resistance in commensal Escherichia coli derived from pigs from an intensive-production farm. Microbes Environ., 33(3): 242-248. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME17041
Mitchaothai J, Srikijkasemwat K (2021). Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from different pig production systems. Anim. Biosci., 35(1): 138-146. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0232
Nguyet LT, Keeratikunakorn K, Kaeoket K, Ngamwongsatit N (2022). Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from diarrheic piglets from pig farms in Thailand that harbor colistin-resistant mcr genes. Sci. Rep., 12(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13192-3
Ojeniyi B, Ahrens P, Meyling A (1994). Detection of fimbrial and toxin genes in Escherichia coli and their prevalence in piglets with diarrhoea. The application of colony hybridization assay, polymerase chain reaction and phenotypic assays. J. Vet. Med., 41(1-10): 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.1994.tb00205.x
Pabón-Rodríguez OV, López-López K, Casas-Bedoya GA, Mogollón-Galvis JD, Serna-Cock L (2023). Adhesion factors and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli strains associated with colibacillosis in piglets in Colombia. Vet. World, 16(6): 1231-1237. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.1231-1237
Peng Z, Hu Z, Li Z, Zhang X, Jia C, Li T, Dai M, Tan C, Xu Z, Wu B, Chen H, Wang X (2022). Antimicrobial resistance and population genomics of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in pig farms in mainland China. Nat. Commun., 13(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28750-6
Peters K, Valenzuela N, Morales-Gomez A, Doiphode S, Ibrahim EE, Sharma M, Sultan A, Mohammed HO (2019). Risk of bacterial food-borne pathogen infection among gastroenteritis cases in Qatar. J. Food Hyg. Saf., 5(2): 79-89. https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh.v5i2.3946
Poirel L, Madec JY, Lupo A, Schink AK, Kieffer N, Nordmann P, Schwarz S (2018). Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Spectr., 6: 14. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0026-2017
Randall LP, Cooles SW, Osborn MK, Piddock LJV, Woodward MJ (2004). Antibiotic resistance genes, integrons and multiple antibiotic resistance in thirty-fire serotypes of Salmonella enterica isolated from humans and animals in the UK. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 2: 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh070
Sáenz Y, Vinué L, Ruiz E, Somalo S, Martínez S, Rojo-Bezares B, Zarazaga M, Torres C (2010). Class 1 integrons lacking qacEΔ1 and sul1 genes in Escherichia coli isolates of food, animal and human origins. Vet. Microbiol., 144(3-4): 493-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.01.026
Santos RLD, Davanzo EFA, Palma JM, Castro VHDL, Costa HMBD, Dallago BSL, Perecmanis S, Santana AP (2022). Molecular characterization and biofilm-formation analysis of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and Escherichia coli isolated from Brazilian swine slaughterhouses. PLoS One, 17(9): e0274636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274636
Smith JL, Fratamico PM (2018). Emerging and re-emerging foodborne pathogens. Foodborne Pathog. Dis., 15(12): 737-757. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2018.2493
Stasiak M, Mackiw E, Kowalska J, Kucharek K, Postupolski J (2021). Silent genes: Antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic production. Pol. J. Microbiol., 70(4): 421-429. https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2021-040
Ström G, Halje M, Karlsson D, Jiwakanon J, Pringle M, Fernström LL, Magnusson U (2017). Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Contr., 17(6): 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9
Sudarwanto MB, Lukman DW, Purnawarman T, Latif H, Pisestyani H, Sukmawinata E (2017). Multidrug resistance extended spectrum β-lactamase and AmpC producing Escherichia coli isolated from the environment of Bogor Slaughterhouse, Indonesia. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 7(8): 708–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2017.07.012
Thanh Duong L, Can ND (2005). Current status of integrated crop-animal systems (ICAS) in Vietnam: a case study in the Mekong Delta. In: Sombilla MA, Hardy B (eds). Integrated crop-animal systems in Southeast Asia: Current status and prospects. Los Baños (Philippines), International Rice Research Institute. IRRI Limited Proceedings, (11): 46-62. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=24a7b341494be92a53633e13213e965c9440ad63#page=50
Utama CS, Sulistiyanto B, Marifah B, Cahya RI (2023). The organoleptic, chemical and microbiological quality of maggotâ s frass as alternative poultry feed ingredients. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 13(5): 340-347. https://doi.org/10.51227/ojafr.2023.49
Varga C, Rajić A, McFall ME, Reid-Smith RJ, Deckert AE, Checkley SL, McEwen SA (2009). Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms. Prev. Vet. Med., 88(3): 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002
Wang L, Liu N, Gao Y, Liu J, Huang X, Zhang Q, Li Y, Zhao J, Wang J, Zhao G (2021). Surveillance and reduction control of Escherichia coli and diarrheagenic E. coli during the pig slaughtering process in China. Front. Vet. Sci., 8: 735076. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.735076
Wei SH (2013). Escherichia coli contamination of pork carcasses in UK slaughterhouses. PhD thesis. University of Nottingham, The United Kingdom.
Wolny-Koładka K, Lenart-Boroń A (2016). Phenotypic and molecular assessment of drug resistance profile and genetic diversity of waterborne Escherichia coli. Water Air Soil Pollut., 227: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2833-z
Wu C, Cheng F, Chen L, Hung Y, Wang L, Hung H (2021). Risk factors and prevalence of mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli in fecal carriages among community children in Southern Taiwan. Front. Microbiol., 12: 748525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.748525
Yang H, Wei S, Hobman JL, Dodd CE (2020). Antibiotic and metal resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from pig slaughterhouses in the United Kingdom. Antibiotics, 9(11): 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110746
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?