Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Soluble Expression of IFNα2-Tα1 Fusion Protein in Escherichia coli by N-terminal SUMO Fusion and its Anti-Proliferative Activity

PJZ_50_4_1413-1419

 

 

Soluble Expression of IFNα2-Tα1 Fusion Protein in Escherichia coli by N-terminal SUMO Fusion and its Anti-Proliferative Activity

Muhammad Shahbaz Aslam1, Iram Gull1, Zaigham Abbas2,* and Muhammad Amin Athar1

1Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore

2Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of the Punjab, Lahore

ABSTRACT

Interferon alpha 2 (IFNα-2) is a type of cytokine with both antiviral and anticancer activities. Binding of IFNα-2 to its receptor on cell surface leads to activation of interferon stimulated genes which mediate its anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic properties. Similarly, Thymosin alpha 1 (Tα-1) helps to fight against different infections such as cancer and hepatitis with its immune modulating properties as well as through its direct action on target cells. The recombinant expression of some proteins in E. coli produces inclusion bodies which are misfolded proteins. The objective of this study was soluble expression of IFNα2-Tα1 fusion protein in E. coli using pET-SUMO vector and determination of its biological activity. SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 was successfully expressed in soluble form with IPTG induction to final concentration 0.5 mM at 37oC for 4 h and purified using affinity chromatography. SUMO tag was removed from SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 by SUMO protease and recombinant IFNα2-Tα1 was collected in flow through by affinity chromatography. The MW (~23 kDa) of IFNα2-Tα1 was determined by 12 % SDS-PAGE and its integrity was confirmed by Immuno blot analysis using anti-interferon α-2 and anti-thymosin α-1 antibodies. Purified IFNα2-Tα1 demonstrated anti-proliferation activity as assessed by MTT assay. This study also showed that N-terminal fusion of SUMO with IFNα2-Tα1 is effective for its soluble expression and to make its purification process more convenient.


Article Information

Received 22 November 2017

Revised 02 February 2018

Accepted 10 February 2018

Available online 19 June 2018

Authors’ Contribution

MSA and IG performed the experiments. ZA did statitical analysis and prepared the manuscript. MAA designed the experiments and supervised the research.

Key words

Soluble expression, SUMO fusion, Immobilized metal affinity chromatography, MTT assay, IPTG.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2018.50.4.1413.1419

* Corresponding author: zaigham.mmg@gmail.com

0030-9923/2018/0004-1413 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2018 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Introduction

 

The production of recombinant biopharmaceuticals is a major concern of biotechnology industry for the treatment of different diseases. Cytokines are used to inhibit tumor growth and elimination of HBV infection through immune activation or by inducing different signaling pathways (Yuchen and Ulrike, 2017). Interferon alpha (IFNα) is a widely used cytokine for treatment of hepatitis and cancer. IFNα-2 is a form of IFNα which is approved by FDA for treatment of different types of cancers either alone or in combination with other therapeutic drugs (Ningrum, 2014). It is being used for hepatitis treatment in combination with ribavirin, lamivudine or adevofir and also used for treatment of cancer in combination with cytarabinvinblastine, 5-fluorouracil, tamoxifen, or interleukin-2 for treatment of cancer (Wang et al., 2002; Leader et al., 2008). IFNα-2 shows anti-proliferative activity by directly inhibiting the cancerous cells growth by apoptosis, cell cycle inhibition or differentiation. It also acts indirectly by activating immune cells such as natural killer cells and induction of other cytokines for inhibition of cancer growth (Sarkar et al., 2003).

Tα1 is small peptide of 28 amino acids which stimulate immune response and causes differentiation of T cells (Rustgi, 2005). Tα1 enhance response of immune system cells such as natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, differentiation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, dendritic cells maturation through toll like receptors activation, stimulation of Th1 type immune response and anti-tumor cytotoxic T cells (Xiaoning et al., 2015). It is either used alone or in combination for therapy of various disorders and it is found very effective in reducing the tumor growth (Qin et al., 2009). The use of Tα1 in combination with IFNα or interleukin 2 give elevated biological effect by restoring cytotoxic action in conditions where immune response is suppressed by tumors or anti-cancer drugs and also demonstrate tumor regression in different in different types of mice models (Garaci et al., 2012).

Cloning and expression of therapeutically important proteins is preferred in E. coli due to its simple genetics and rapid growth rate. The expression of heterologous recombinant proteins in the form of inclusion bodies require several steps to get soluble active protein before purification (Wang et al., 2006; Mohammed et al., 2012). Multiple approaches have been used for soluble expression of eukaryokic proteins in E. coli (Cabrita et al., 2006; Burgess-Brown et al., 2008; Gustafsson et al., 2004; Rabhi-Essafi et al., 2007). Production of target protein as a fusion protein increases the efficiency of its soluble expression in E. coli. glutathione S transferase (Rabhi-Essafi et al., 2007), Nus A (De Marco et al., 2004), Maltose binding protein (Kapust and Waugh, 1999) and small ubiquitin like modifying protein (SUMO) (Butt et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2013) are widely used fusion tags for soluble expression and simplify purification process of target proteins (Zhu et al., 2013). SUMO shields the target protein by using its chaperoning properties and enhance its solubility (Satakarni and Curtis, 2011).

In this study, IFNα2-Tα1 was expressed in soluble and biologically active form in E. coli by using pET-SUMO vector. The IFNα2-Tα1 fusion gene was expressed with N-terminal SUMO fusion under T7 promoter of pET-SUMO vector, purified by immobilized metal ion chromatography and its anti-proliferation activity was determined by MTT assay in comparison with commercial IFNα2b.

 

Materials and Methods

Construction of pETSUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 recombinant vector

IFNα2-Tα1 gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction with forward primer (IT-SUMO-F) (5’- TGTGATCTGCCTCAAACC-3’) and reverse primer (IT-SUMO-R) (5’-T TAGTTCTCGGCCTCCTAC-3’) in a reaction mixture with pTZ-IFNα2-Tα1 vector (constructed in previous study) as template, dNTPs (2.5 mM), MgCl2 (2 mM), 1X PCR buffer (1 X) and Taq polymerase (5 units). The temperature profile was set as initial denaturation (1X) at 94°C for 5 min followed to 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 seconds, annealing at 52°C for 45 seconds and extension at 72°C for 1 min and final extension (1X) at 72°C for 20 min. Amplicon (IFNα2-Tα1 gene) was analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and gel purified with geneJET gel extraction kit (Thermo Scientific). IFNα2-Tα1 gene was directly inserted in to pET SUMO vector (Invitrogen) following the instructions of the manufacturer (Champion™ pET SUMO Protein Expression System, Invitrogen) using T4 DNA ligase.

Expression analysis

Recombinant pET SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 vector was transformed in to competent cells of E. coli BL21 (DE3) and expressed under T7 promoter of pET SUMO expression vector (Invitrogen). 10 ml LB medium (1 % tryptone, 1 % yeast extract, 0.5 % NaCl, pH 7.2) containing kanamycin (40 µg/ml) was inoculated with a colony of recombinant clones and incubated at 37°C, 180 rpm until OD 0.7 at 600 nm is reached. Culture with OD600 0.7 was cetrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C and pellet was resuspended in 5 ml fresh LB medium containing kanamycin (40 µg/ml). After that, 50 ml terrific broth (TB) medium supplemented with glucose (1%), kanamycin (40 µg/ml) was inoculated with 2 ml of above culture and incubated at 37oC, 180 rpm until OD 0.5 at 600 nm is reached. Un-induced sample (5 ml) was collected to use as control for expression analysis and pelleted at 8000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The remaining culture was induced with IPTG to 0.5 mM and placed in incubator for 4 h at 37°C, 180 rpm. Induced cell culture was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C and both pellet and supernatant were stored at -20°C for analysis.

Bacterial cell lysis and SDS-PAGE analysis

The expression of recombinant IFNα2-Tα1 induced by IPTG was checked on 12% SDS-PAGE in both soluble and insoluble cytoplasmic fractions. Induced and un-induced cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl pH 6.1, 5 mM EDTA, 1mM PMSF, 0.5% Triton X-100) and lyzed by sonication on ice for 30 min with intervals of 30 seconds. The cell extract were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C and supernatants were collected (soluble fraction) in a tube. Cell pellets (insoluble fraction) were resuspended in lysis buffer and 12% SDS-PAGE (Laemmli, 1970) was used to check presence of target protein both soluble and insoluble fractions. The protein concentration was estimated using a Bradford assay (Bradford, 1976).

Purification and SUMO protease cleavage

The column was packed with Ni2+ sepharose resin and washed with wash buffer (10 column volume). After equilibration of column with 10 column volume of equilibration buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM imidazole, 150 mM NaCl), soluble cytoplasmic fraction containing SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 with His6 tag at its N terminal end was filtered through 0.22 µm syringe filter and loaded on to column. The column was washed with 10 column volume of binding buffer to wash unbound proteins and bound SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 was eluted with 3 column volume of elution buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole). Fractions were collected, dialyzed with 1X PBS and analyzed by absorbance at 280 nm. Presence of SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 was further analysed by 12% SDS-PAGE (Laemmli, 1970). Purified SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 was concentrated by freeze dryer and concentration was adjusted to 1 mg/ml. The SUMO protease digestion reaction was prepared in 1X SUMO protease buffer with SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 (0.2 mg/ml) and SUMO protease (20 Units). Digestion reaction was incubated at room temperature for 5 h and analyzed by 12 % SDS-PAGE gel. Digestion reaction was dialyzed with 1X PBS and IFNα2-Tα1 was purified by Ni-sepharose column. IFNα2-Tα1 was collected in flow through and concentrated by freeze dryer. Purified IFNα2-Tα1 was analyzed by 12 % SDS-PAGE and total protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay (Bradford, 1976).

Immuno blot analysis

Purified IFNα2-Tα1 was resolved on 12 % SDS PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane with transblot semi-dry apparatus (Biorad) at 18 volts for 2 h using buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl buffer pH 8.3, 192 mM glycine, 20 % (v/v) methanol, 0.1 % SDS). Non-specific sites on membrane were blocked by incubating membrane in 5 % (w/v) skimmed milk in 1X TBS-T buffer (920 mM Tris pH 7.6, 13 mM NaCl, 0.1 % (v/v) Tween 20) for 1 h at 4oC. The membrane was divided into two parts and one part of membrane was incubated with mouse anti-interferon α-2 antibody (1:3000 dilutions) and other part was incubated with mouse anti-thymosin α-1 antibody separately for 1 h at room temperature. Each blot was washed for three times with 1X TBS-T buffer (10 min/wash) and membranes were incubated in goat anti-mouse IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugated (1:5000 dilution in 1X TBS-T) at room temperature for 2 h. After washing, the color reaction was developed by incubating the blots in BCIP/NBT substrate solution in carbonate buffer (pH 9.8). The reaction was stopped by washing membranes in water and strips were air dried and analysed.

MTT assay

Anti-proliferative activity of IFNα2-Tα1 using its different concentrations was compared with commercial IFN-α2b using MTT assay on HepG2 cell line. Briefly, MTT stock solution (5 mg/ml) was prepared and filtered by 0.22 µm syringe filter. The HepG2 cells were seeded in triplicate at 10,000/cm2 density in a 48-well cell culture plates, respectively for sample and reference protein. Culture medium was replaced with different concentrations (1-10 ng) of both proteins in fresh culture medium after 24 h of seeding. After 24 h of proteins treatment, 10 µl MTT stock solutions was added to each well of 48-well plate and the cells were incubated at 37oC for 4 h in 5% CO2. After 4 h, the medium was removed and cells were washed with 1X PBS buffer. MTT solubilizing agent (200 µl/well) was added to the cells and plates were incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Purple color at varying intensity was observed as MTT crystals solubilized. The contents (150 µl/well) were transferred to 96-well micro titer plate and absorbance was taken at 560 nm. The graph was plotted for percentage cytotoxicity against each concentration of both proteins.

 

 

Results

Construction of pETSUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 vector and its expression analysis

IFNα2-Tα1gene was (Fig. 1A) cloned in to pET SUMO expression vector Invitrogen). The pET SUMO expression vector uses SUMO to increase soluble expression of native protein and also simplify its purification process. IFNα2-Tα1gene was cloned in pET SUMO expression vector under T7 promoter with N-terminal SUMO fusion partner and His6 tag for affinity purification. E. coli cells were transformed with recombinant pET SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 vector and colony PCR was used to screen recombinant transformed clones (Fig. 1B). Expression of the SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 was optimized with respect to IPTG concentration, induction time and temperature. 12 % SDS–PAGE analysis showed successful expression of SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 in soluble fraction after induction with 0.5 mM IPTG for 4 h at 37°C (Fig. 1C). Band of ~ 38 kDa was observed on gel following staining with coomassie brilliant blue. It was also observed that ~ 80 % of SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 was expressed in soluble form (Fig. 1C, lane 4) and ~ 20 % fusion protein was observed in insoluble pellet (Fig. 1C, lane 3).

Purification and immuno blot analysis

SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 fusion protein with N-terminal His6 tag was purified by affinity chromatography on Ni+-sepharose column. SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 was eluted from column and analyzed by 12 % SDS-PAGE which appeared with molecular weight of ~38 kDa (Fig. 2A). Purified SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 was subjected to cleavage reaction by SUMO protease for removal of SUMO tag and analyzed by 12 % SDS-PAGE. The presence of two bands of IFNα2-Tα1 and SUMO on 12 % SDS-PAGE gel confirmed the successful cleavage of SUMO tag (Fig. 2B). IFNα2-Tα1 was purified from cleavage reaction by Ni+ sepharose column and IFNα2-Tα1 was collected in the flow through. After removal of SUMO tag, purified IFNα2-Tα1 was resolved by 12 % SDS-PAGE which showed single band of ~23 kDa (Fig. 2C). The identity of purified IFNα2-Tα1 was confirmed by immuno blotting using mouse anti-interferon α-2 and mouse anti-thymosin α-1 antibodies respectively as shown in Figure 2D and E.

IFNα2-Tα1 fusion protein demonstrates anti-proliferative activity

Anti-proliferative activity of recombinant IFNα2-Tα1 was evaluated using MTT colorimetric assay on HepG2 cell line in comparison with commercial IFN-α2b. Recombinant IFNα2-Tα1 and commercial IFN-α2b showed a significant anti-proliferative activity after 24 h of treatment on HepG2 cells. Interestingly, IFNα2-Tα1 showed more anti tumor cell proliferation as compared to commercial IFN-α2b. The viability of HepG2 cells decreased up to 65 % at 10 ng/ml concentration of IFNα2-Tα1as compared to 52 % decrease with commercial IFN-α2b at same concentration (Fig. 3).

 

 

Discussion

 

E. coli provides less expensive and simple approach for expression of hetrologous recombinant proteins (Studier, 2005). However, majority of cytokines express in the form of incorrectly refolded aggregates called inclusion bodies in E. coli (Rosano and Ceccarelli, 2014). Therefore, it is a need to establish approaches for soluble expression of cytokines in E. coli expression system (Mohammed et al., 2012; Baneyx, 1999). The use of highly soluble partner in fusion with target protein is an effective strategy for soluble expression of protein of interest (Jana and Deb, 2005). In this study, we described a strategy to express IFNα2-Tα1 fusion protein in soluble and biologically active form in E. coli expression system using pET SUMO vector (invitrogen). The fusion of SUMO with target protein facilitates folding of target protein through its chaperon-like effect (Malakhov et al., 2004; Butt et al., 2005) and also helps it to fold in correct conformations for soluble expression (Kong and Guo, 2011).

IFNs have wide range of therapeutic applications including proliferative disorders (Wang et al., 2002). Recombinant human IFN-a2b is widely used in monotherapy or in combined therapy with other drugs, such as cytarabin, vinblastine, 5-fluorouracil, tamoxifen, or interleukin-2 on cancer treatment, and combined with the nucleoside analogs lamivudine, adevofir, entecavir, telbivudine, or ribavirin for treatment of different diseases (Ningrum, 2014; Foster, 2010; Lin and Young, 2014; Wang et al., 2002). Tα1 is a polypeptide of 28 amino acids which modulate immune response and decreases tumor cell growth (Jian-Hua et al., 2012; Belinda et al., 2016). Tα1 had been expressed in fusion with proteins like thymopentin (Juan et al., 2008) and human serum albumin (Jian-Hua et al., 2010). The anti-proliferative activity of Tα1 had been observed in lung adenocarcinoma and HepG2 hepatoma cells of humans (Qin et al., 2009). Our study showed that fusion of Tα1 with IFNα2 is more effective in inhibiting proliferation of tumor cells. Although we need more in vivo trials to accurately explain the mechanism of action of IFNα2-Tα1 fusion protein.

Briefly, we cloned IFNα2-Tα1 gene in pET SUMO expression vector (Invitrogen) downstream of SUMO gene by following instructions given in manual (Champion™ pET SUMO Protein Expression System, Invitrogen) with His6-tag at N-terminal end of SUMO tag for purification by immobilized metal ions chromatography. Recombinant pET SUMO- IFNα2-Tα1was transformed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and induced with IPTG to final concentration 0.5 mM in TBG medium. 12 % SDS–PAGE analysis confirmed that about 80% SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 is expressed in soluble form in soluble cytoplasmic fraction soluble with molecular weight ~38 kDa (Fig. 1C). Similarly in other studies, SUMO is fused with Fibroblast growth factor 21 (Huiyan et al., 2014), bovine ß-lactoglobulin (Ponniah et al., 2010), interferon consensus (IFN-con) (Karolina et al., 2014), APRIL (Jie et al., 2014) for their soluble expression in E.coli. SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 fusion protein was purified from soluble cell fraction by Ni+ affinity chromatography and subjected to cleavage reaction by SUMO protease for removal of SUMO. The ability of SUMO protease to cleave partner proteins with high reliability and efficiency prove SUMO fusion system the best choice for soluble expression of target proteins (Malakhov et al., 2004). Electrophoretic analysis of purified SUMO-IFNα2-Tα1 (Fig. 2A) and cleavage reaction confirmed successful purification and cleavage of SUMO tag (Fig. 2B). After removal of SUMO tag, the IFNα2-Tα1 was analyzed on 12 % SDS-PAGE and showed single band of ~23 kDa (Fig. 2C). The identity of purified IFNα2-Tα1 was confirmed by immuno blot analysis with mouse anti-interferon α-2 and mouse anti-thymosin α-1 antibodies respectively (Fig. 2D, E). Anti-proliferative activity of IFNα2-Tα1 demonstrated that it is more active than single commercial IFN-α2b in inhibiting tumor cell proliferation. The viability of HepG2 cells decreased up to 65 % at 10 ng/ml concentration of IFNα2-Tα1as compared to 52 % decrease with commercial IFN-α2b (Fig. 3).

 

Conclusion

 

It is concluded that fusion of SUMO at N-terminal end of IFNα2-Tα1 is effective for its soluble expression to make purification process simple. This is a first report on soluble expression of IFNα2-Tα1 in E. coli by using pET SUMO expression vector showing anti-cancer activity.

 

Statement of conflict of interest

Authors have declared no conflict of interest.

 

References

 

Baneyx, F., 1999. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 10: 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(99)00003-8

Belinda, S.P., Jai, R. and Paul, J.H., 2016. Antitumour actions of interferons: Implications for cancer therapy. Nature Rev., 16: 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.14

Burgess-Brown, N.A., Sharma, S., Sobott, F., Loenarz, C., Oppermann, U. and Gileadi, O., 2008. Codon optimization can improve expression of human genes in Escherichia coli: A multi-gene study. Protein Expres. Purif., 59: 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2008.01.008

Butt, T.R., Edavettal, S.C., Hall, J.P. and Mattern, M.R., 2005. SUMO fusion technology for difficult-to-express proteins. Protein Expres. Purif., 43: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2005.03.016

Bradford, M.M., 1976. Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 72: 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

Cabrita, L.D., Dai, W. and Bottomley S.P., 2006. A family of E. coli expression vectors for laboratory scale and high throughput soluble protein production. BMC Biotechnology, 6: 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-6-12

De Marco, V., Stier, G., Blandin, S. and de Marco, A., 2004. The solubility and stability of recombinant proteins are increased by their fusion to NusA, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 322: 766-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.07.189

Foster, G.R., 2010. Pegylated interferons for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: Pharmacological and clinical differences between peginterferon-alpha-2a and peginterferon-alpha-2b. Drugs, 70: 147-165. https://doi.org/10.2165/11531990-000000000-00000

Garaci, E., Pica, F., Serafino, A., Balestrieri, E., Matteucci, C., Moroni, G., Sorrentino, R., Zonfrillo, M., Pierimarchi, P. and Sinibaldi-Vallebona, P., 2012. Thymosin alpha1 and cancer: action on immune effector and tumor target cells. Annls. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1269: 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06697.x

Gustafsson, C., Govindarajan, S. and Minshull, J., 2004. Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends Biotechnol., 22: 346-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.006

Huiyan, W., Yechen, X., Lianjun, F., Hongxin, Z., Yaofang, Z., Xiaoshan, W., Yuxia, Q., Yadong, H., Hongchang, G. and Xiaokun, L., 2010. High-level expression and purification of soluble recombinant FGF21 protein by SUMO fusion in Escherichia coli. BMC Biotechnology, 10: 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-10-14

Jana, S. and Deb, J.K., 2005. Strategies for efficient production of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 67: 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1814-0

Jian-Hua, C., Xin-Guo, Z., Yu-tao, J., Lu-Ying, Y., Li, T., Yi-Wei, Y., Dai-Shuang, C., Jing, C. and Min, W., 2010. Bioactivity and pharmacokinetics of two human serum albumin–thymosin α1-fusion proteins, rHSA-Tα1 and rHSA-L-Tα1, expressed in recombinant Pichia pastoris. Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 59: 1335-1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-010-0862-9

Juan, L., Yanna, C., Xinke, Z., Lei, Z., Zhen, H., Pingli, L., Yuliang, X., Qian, Z. and Fengshan W., 2013. The in vivo immunomodulatory and synergistic anti-tumor activity of thymosin α1–thymopentin fusion peptide and its binding to TLR2. Cancer Lett., 337: 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2013.05.006

Jie, Z., Lei, M. and Zhang S.Q., 2014. Expression and purification of soluble human APRIL in Escherichia coli using ELP-SUMO tag. Protein Expres. Purif., 95: 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2013.12.013

Kapust, R.B. and Waugh, D.S., 1999. Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein is uncommonly effective at promoting the solubility of polypeptides to which it is fused. Protein Sci., 8: 1668-1674. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.8.8.1668

Karolina, P., Rita, T., Ji-won, C., Steve, B. and Emmanuelle, L., 2014. Expression of soluble and active interferon consensus in SUMO fusion expression system in E. coli. Protein Expres. Purif., 99: 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2014.03.009

Kong, B. and Guo, G.L., 2011. Enhanced in vitro refolding of fibroblast growth factor 15 with the assistance of SUMO fusion partner. PLoS One, 6: 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020307

Laemmli, U.K., 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227: 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0

Leader, B., Baca, Q.J. and Golan, D.E., 2008. Protein therapeutics: A summary and pharmacological classification. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 7: 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2399

Lin, F.C. and Young, H.A., 2014. Interferons: Success in anti-viral immunotherapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev., 25: 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.07.015

Malakhov, M.P., Mattern, M.R., Malakhova, O.A., Drinker, M., Weeks, S.D. and Butt T.R., 2004. SUMO fusions and SUMO-specific protease for efficient expression and purification of proteins. J. Struct. Funct. Genom., 5: 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSFG.0000029237.70316.52

Mohammed, Y., El-Baky, N.A. and Redwan, E.M., 2012. Expression, purification, and characterization of recombinant human consensus interferon-alpha in Escherichia coli under kP (L) promoter. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol., 42: 426-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2011.637600

Ningrum, R.A., 2014. Human Interferon Alpha-2b: A therapeutic protein for cancer treatment. Scientifica, 2014: Article ID 970315. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/970315

Ponniah, K., Loo, T.S., Edwards, P.J., Pascal, S.M., Jameson, G.B. and Norris G.E., 2010. The production of soluble and correctly folded recombinant bovine ß-lactoglobulin variants A and B in Escherichia coli for NMR studies. Protein Expres. Purif., 70: 283-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2009.12.006

Qin, Y., Chen, F.D., Zhou, L., Gong, X.G., Han Q.F., 2009. Proliferative and anti-proliferative effects of thymosin alpha 1 on cells are associated with manipulation of cellular ROS levels. Chem. Biol. Interact., 180: 383-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2009.05.006

Rabhi-Essafi, I., Sadok, A., Khalaf, N. and Fathallah, D.M., 2007. A strategy for high-level expression of soluble and functional human interferon alpha as a GST-fusion protein in E. coli. Protein Eng. Des. Sel., 20: 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzm012

Rosano, G.L. and Ceccarelli, E.A., 2014. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: Advances and challenges. Front Microbiol., 5: 172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172

Rustgi, V.K., 2005. Thymalfasin for the treatment of chronic hepatisis C infection. Expert. Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther., 3: 885-892. https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.3.6.885

Sarkar, M.C., Lindner, D.J., Liu, Y.F., Williams, B.R., Sen, G.C., Silverman, R.H. and Borden E.C., 2003. Apoptosis and interferons: role of interferon-stimulated genes as mediators of apoptosis. Apoptosis, 8: 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023668705040

Satakarni, M. and Curtis, R., 2011. Production of recombinant peptides as fusions with SUMO. Protein Expres. Purif., 78: 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2011.04.015

Studier, F.W., 2005. Protein production by auto-induction in high-density shaking cultures. Protein Expres. Purif., 41: 207-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016

Wang, F., Liu, Y., Li, J. and Su, G.Z., 2006. On-column refolding of consensus interferon at high concentration with guanidine-hydrochloride and polyethylene glycol gradients. J. Chromatogr. A., 1115: 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.02.075

Wang, Y.S., Youngster, S., Grace, M., Bausch, J., Bordens, R. and Wyss, D.F., 2002. Structural and biological characterization of pegylated recombinant interferon alpha-2b and its therapeutic implications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 54: 547-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00027-3

Xiaoning, W., Jidong, J. and Hong, Y., 2015. Thymosin alpha-1 treatment in chronic hepatitis B. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., 15: 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2015.1007948

Yuchen, X. and Ulrike, P., 2017. Control of hepatitis B Virus by Cytokines. Viruses, 9: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9010018

Zhu, F., Wang, Q., Pu, H., Gu, S., Luo, L. and Yin, Z., 2013. Optimization of soluble human interferon-c production in Escherichia coli using SUMO fusion partner. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 29: 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1185-0

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

August

Vol. 50, Iss. 4, Pages 1199-1600

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe