Research Article

The Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on Alleviating Stress Response and Production Impairment Induced by Escherichia coli Lipopolysaccharide in Laying Hens

Abdulaziz A. Alaqil*

Department of Animal and Fish Production, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 420, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.

Received | April 28, 2023; Accepted | May 18, 2023; Published | June 05, 2023

*Correspondence | Abdulaziz A. Alaqil, Department of Animal and Fish Production, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 420, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia; Email: aalaqil@kfu.edu.sa

Citation | Alaqil AA (2023). The effect of lactobacillus acidophilus on alleviating stress response and production impairment induced by escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide in laying hens. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 11(7): 1183-1192.

DOI https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2023/11.7.1183.1192

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316

 

 

Copyright: 2023 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

INTRODUCTION

Numerous factors can cause stress in the contemporary poultry industry (Abo-Al-Ela et al., 2021). Stress is defined as any factors that endanger the physiological homeostasis of animals or birds and lead to various biological responses by body tissues and cells (Lu et al., 2021). The release of the stress hormone corticosterone (CORT) is one of the first documented responses to stress in birds, which involves in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis stimulation (Blas, 2015). Several criteria are also determined as indicators of stress in poultry such as the differential and total counts of leucocytes and determination of heterophil to lymphocyte cell ratio (Alabi et al., 2014). Stress biomarkers known as heat shock proteins (HSPs) can regulate cellular homeostasis and protein recovery and are additionally produced in excess by stressed cells (Alagar Boopathy et al., 2022). It was also reported that the function of some antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase, were inhibited by exposure of birds to severe stress (Habashy et al., 2019; Muchacka et al., 2018).

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a glycolipid component existed in surface of gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli (Bos et al., 2007). LPS is known as endotoxin which can stimulate the immune system of other organisms and can mimic some aspects of tissue injury caused by bacterial infection (Bertani and Ruiz, 2018). There is an evidence that birds and mammals respond similarly to LPS administration (French et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2023). LPS administration to chickens either directly or indirectly activates the HPA axis (Gehad et al., 2002) and induces fever (De Boever et al., 2008). It was reported that broilers’ intestinal redox status and antioxidant defense system were compromised by the exposure to LPS (Zhang et al., 2021). Furthermore, it was found that oral administration of LPS tablets to broiler chickens drastically affected gut health and induced over-expression of HSP genes (Reisinger et al., 2020). 

The Lactobacillus species, including L. bulgaricus, L. plantarum, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, and L. acidophilus, are the most often utilized probiotic bacteria for avoiding enteropathogenic diseases (Candela et al., 2008). Lactobacilli are categorized within the Gram+ bacteria and normally colonize in the epithelium cells of the digestive system. There, they generate lactic acid and serve as effective probiotics (Bernardeau et al., 2008). L. acidophilus (LA) is one such beneficial probiotic that is often employed to enhance poultry production (Balevi et al., 2001; De Cesare et al., 2017; Gallazzi et al., 2008; Kurtoglu et al., 2004; Salarmoini and Fooladi, 2011). It was demonstrated that LA probiotic supplementation to laying hens’ diets can improve their productive performance, egg yolk cholesterol, and immune response (Alaqil et al., 2020). LA has been shown to be able to boost immune system defenses and stop the activity of various entero-toxigenic and entero-invasive bacteria (Moura et al., 2001). LA has been characterized by the high competition for adherence sites in the intestines against enteropathogenic bacteria (Oelschlaeger, 2010). Additionally, it has been demonstrated that probiotic bacteria, such as LA, interact with the epithelial cells and specifically regulate the synthesis of inflammatory mediators (Nissen et al., 2009).

Even though probiotic bacteria have been found in numerous trials to reduce intestinal inflammation, there are no research examining the effectiveness of probiotics in reducing the challenge effects of LPS’s ability to generate inflammation in poultry. Therefore, we investigated how probiotic LA counteracting the LPS challenge in laying hens and explored the underlying mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical statement

The care, handling, and treatments of the chickens were applied considering the protocols recommended by the research ethical commission of King Faisal University in Saudi Arabia.

Lactobacillus Culture Preparation

The lyophilized LA culture was purchased from a private enterprise in Germany (Wisby Gmbh Co. & Kg, Niebüll). The bacteria were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After cold centrifuging at 2,000 × g for 10 min, the pellets were collected then lyophilized and kept at –20 °C. Cornstarch and skim milk powder were combined with the bacteria to adjust the concentration to 1×109 cells per gram (colony forming unit, CFU). To make sure that the viable bacterial cells maintained at the same concentration (1×109 CFU/g) throughout the experiment, the bacteria culture was introduced to the diet and the vitality of the bacterial cells was evaluated every two weeks.

Experimental Design

In the current study, one hundred twenty, 40-wk-old, laying hens (Hy-line) were individually housed in battery cages in an open structure provided with 16L/8D hours daily. Similar environmental and hygienic conditions were provided to all birds throughout the experimental period. Feed and water were introduced ad libitum to the layers. Based on the dietary recommendations for the commercial Hy-line layers, a basal diet was created and utilized as a control diet (Table 1). The hens were allocated into four groups of 30 birds at random. For eight consecutive weeks (40–48 weeks of age), two groups of the layers were given a control diet, while the remaining two groups were given a control diet enriched with 2 g/kg LA bacteria. At 47 wk of age, layers in one of the control or LA groups were intravenously injected for 7 consecutive days with 0.5 ml of sterile saline contained LPS extracted from Escherichia coli O55:B5 breed (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a concentration of 8 mg/kg of layer body weight, whereas the layers in the other ones of the control or LA groups received an intravenous injection with 0.5 ml saline only. The Doses of LA and LPS injection were chosen based on previous works of Alaqil et al. (2020) and Geng et al. (2018), respectively. The productive performance was noted throughout the entire experimental time (40-48 wk) for the four treatment groups (control, LPS, LPS+LA, and LA groups, respectively). On the last day of the trial (48 wk of age), 10 layers in each treatment group were assigned to measure the rectal temperature. In addition, 10 blood samples were gathered from the layers to determine the heterophil to lymphocyte cell (H/L) ratio, and the plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) and corticosterone (CORT) concentrations. Moreover, the spleens and duodenums were also taken out of ten layers per treatment group to measure the splenic heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) expression and the duodenal glutathione peroxidase (GHS-px) enzyme activity.

 

Table 1: Ingredients and nutrient composition (%) of the basal diet.

Ingredient	%
Yellow corn	56.55
Soybean meal (44%)	27.60
Wheat bran	1.00
soybean oil	3.00
Bone meal	3.00
Limestone	8.00
Salt (NaCl)	0.40
Vit. & min. mixture *	0.30
DL-Methionine	0.15
Total	100
Nutrient composition	Calculated per kg dry matter( DM)
Metabolizable energy	2800 Kcal
Crude protein	174.7 g
Calcium	40.2 g
None-phytate phosphorus (NPP)	5.2 g
Lysine	9.5 g
Methionine	4.2 g
Linoleic acid	28.8 g

* Vitamin and mineral mixture at 0.3% of the diet supplies the following per Kg of the diet: vitamin A, 8,000 IU/kg; vitamin D, 1,500 IU/kg; riboflavin, 4 mg/kg; cobalamin, 10 μg/kg; vitamin E, 15 mg/kg; vitamin K, 2 mg/kg; choline, 500 mg/kg; niacin, 25 mg/kg; manganese, 60 mg/kg; zinc, 50 mg/kg.

Productive Performance

Throughout the trial period (40-48 weeks), egg counts and weights were recorded daily per hen. The average egg weight, egg mass (egg number × egg weight), and daily feed intake as well as egg production rate (egg number %) per hen were determined for all the treatment groups. Then, using the total mass of eggs produced over the whole trial time divided by the total amount of feed consumed, the feed conversion ratio was calculated.

Body Temperature

A thermocouple rectal thermometer (Physitemp Instruments Inc., Clifton, NJ) with a 3-cm entry tip was used to measure the body temperatures of the chickens. The temperature was recorded when the measurement remained steady for 15 seconds.

Blood Samples And Measurements

Approximately 3 mL of blood were drawn from the chickens’ brachial veins and put right away into heparinized tubes. Two drops of the blood sample were expelled separately on a clean slide to make a thin smear. The dried smears were fixed and stained with a HEMA-3 solution (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA, USA). A total of 100 leukocyte cells in each slide were differentiated under light microscope using oil immersion at 1000× magnification. The average counts of the 2 slides were pointed out and the H/L ratio was then detected (Mehaisen et al., 2017). The remaining blood samples underwent a centrifugation of 5,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4 °C. The plasma samples were separated and kept at −20 °C to further determine the MDA and CORT concentrations.

Plasma Malondialdehyde

Chicken-specific ELISA kits (MBS260816, MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to detect the plasma MDA levels. In brief, 100 µL of plasma were combined with 300 µL of thiobarbituric acid (T.B.A.) solution and incubated for 30 minutes at 95 °C, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mixture was centrifuged at 10000 x g for 10 minutes at 25 °C after chilling in an ice bath for 10 minutes. The absorbance was measured at 532 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., USA) after aliquots of 200 µL of the supernatants were transferred to a 96-well microplate. The detection range for the analysis was 1.56-100 mol/mL, and the intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variations (CVs) were less than 8% and 12%, respectively, according to the manufacturer.

Plasma Corticosterone

ELISA kits specialized for chicken CORT (MBS701668; MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA) were utilized and the manufacturer protocol was employed in this analysis. Briefly, 50 µL of the standard or the sample were mixed with 50 μL of the antibody in pre-coated-antigen microplate wells. Following a 30-minute incubation period at 25°C, the wells were aspirated and washed three times with 250 µL of washing buffer, with the residues removed by flipping the plate and blotting it on clean paper towels. Each well received 100 μL of horseradish peroxidase (H.R.P.) conjugated reagent, which was heated around 25°C for 30 min. 100 μL of T.M.B. ELISA-substrate was added to each well in the dark and incubated for another 15 minutes. Subsequently, 50 μL of the stop-reaction solution was added to each well and gently mixed, and the optical density was measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., USA) at 450 nm. The intra- and inter-assay CVs were respectively 8% and 10%. The assay’s sensitivity was <0.0625 ng/mL with a dynamic range of 0.5-20 ng/mL.

Hsp70 Expression Analysis

The entire spleen was obtained, stored in liquid nitrogen, and kept at −20°C until HSP70 density analysis. Three milliliters of cooled Tris-buffer mixed with 10 μl/ml of protease inhibitor cocktail were used to homogenize 0.5 g of spleen samples in a Potter-Elvehjem tissue grinder from Sigma-Aldrich. The samples were centrifuged at 23,000 × g for 45 min at 4°C. Protein contents in the supernatant were assessed using bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit, BCA-1 (B9643, Sigma-Aldrich). A mini-gel device (Cleaver Scientific Ltd., Warwickshire, UK) was used to separate 25 g of total protein on Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate–polyacrylamide gels 10% (0.75×70×80 mm). Gels were subjected to 120 V electrophoresis until the tracking dye accumulated at the gel’s base. Protein fractions were transferred on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (MSI, Westborough, MA, USA) using Coomassie Blue staining or a Trans-Blot semidry electrophoretic transfer cell (Cleaver Scientific Ltd.). After rinsing the membranes with distilled water, 10 mL of a cold-blocking buffer (Kirkegaard and Perry Labs Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA) was added for 60 minutes to block nonspecific binding sites. The membranes were treated for 1 h in 5 mL of blocking buffer with 1:20,000 HSP70 antiserum (monoclonal mouse antibody; ab6535, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). The blots were cleaned with 10 mL of chilled Tris-buffered saline Tween 20 three times for five minutes each. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody (cat. no. ab6728, Abcam) was then used to treat the blots for 30 min. The blots were subjected to an extended chemiluminescent reagent (ChemiGlow, Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, USA) after three 5-minute rinses with cold Tris-buffered saline Tween 20. Chemiluminescent imaging (FluorChem 5500, Alpha Innotech) and Image-Pro Plus image processing and analysis software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA) were used to visualize and quantify the band summation density. Immunodetected protein sizes were verified by molecular weight markers (Precision Plus Protein, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). All solutions were made with Milli-Q water (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).

Glutathione Peroxidase (Gsh-Px) Activity

The digestive tract was immediately removed after decapitation, and the duodenum was separated and refrigerated to zero °C in 0.85% NaCl solution. From the center of the duodenum, a piece of about 10 cm in length was removed, sliced, and thoroughly cleaned in 0.85% NaCl solution. The mucosa was gently disposed of the luminal face and placed inside 2.5 mL aseptic tubes and then stored at −20 °C. The scraped mucosa was weighed, homogenized in nine lots of ice-cold 0.85% NaCl solution in a cold homogenizer, then centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and then the supernatant was collected for further detection (Wu et al., 2013). The total protein was first determined in the supernatant using the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976). Ten μL of the sample was mixed well with a reaction mixture contained 1 mL of assay buffer (phosphate buffer and Triton X-100, pH 7.0), 100 μL of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) reagent (glutathione, glutathione reductase and NADPH), and 100 μL of H2O2 (previously diluted 100 times). Finally, the GSH-Px activity was detected using an automated analyzer at 550 nm following the biochemical methods indicated in the corresponding reagent kit (Cat. No.: A005, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute of China, Nanjing, China).

Statistical Analysis

The general linear model (GLM) procedure with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of SAS/STAT® 9.3 software (Copyright 2011, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to analyze the main effects of the treatment groups (Control, LPS, LPS+LA, and LA) on the studied parameters in the current study. Data were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The variances in the data were homogeneous, as indicated by results with use of the Levene’s test. For each successfully completed test, the experimental unit was the number of observations per treatment group (n=30 for the productive performance traits, and n=10 for the remaining parameters). Significant treatment effects were detected by Duncan’s multiple range test at a P-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

Productive Performance

Table 2 illustrates the impact of dietary LA inclusion on the productive performance of laying hens challenged with LPS. Compared to the control group, the challenge with LPS significantly (P < 0.05) impaired the layers’ productive performance parameters. In contrast, LA supplementation

 

Table 2: Effect of dietary Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA) supplementation and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) challenge on the productive performance of laying hens 1.

Traits	Control	LPS	LPS+LA	LA
Egg production (%)	92.2 ± 0.55 b	70.4 ± 0.46 d	78.9 ± 0.62 c	95.3 ± 0.72 a
Egg weight (g)	61.8 ± 0.32 a	57.1 ± 0.33 b	58.8 ± 0.35 b	62.0 ± 0.37 a
Feed intake (g/d/hen)	137.3 ± 2.34 a	104.8 ± 2.45 b	111.2 ± 2.35 b	135.5 ± 2.38 a
Feed/egg ratio	2.41 ± 0.037 b	2.62 ± 0.036 a	2.46 ± 0.030 b	2.30 ± 0.038 c

1All data are presented as means ± SE of 30 hens per treatment group. Means within a row with no common superscripts (a, b, c, d) significantly differ at P < 0.05. Treatment groups: control, layers were fed on a basal diet and injected with 0.5 mL saline; LPS, layers were fed on a basal diet and injected with 0.5 mL LPS at 8 mg/kg body weight; LPS+LA, layers were fed on a basal diet containing 2×109 CFU/kg LA and injected with 0.5 mL LPS at 8 mg/kg body weight; LA, layers were fed on a basal diet containing 2×109 CFU/kg LA and injected with 0.5 mL saline.

 

Table 3: Effect of dietary Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA) supplementation and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) challenge on stress parameter indicators 1.

Trait	Control	LPS	LPS + LA	LA
Body temperature (˚C)	41.8 ± 0.21 c	43.5 ± 0.30 a	42.4 ± 0.17 b	41.5 ± 0.23 c
H/L ratio	0.57 ± 0.08 c	0.71 ± 0.07 a	0.61 ± 0.05 b	0.49 ± 0.06 c
Plasma malondialdehyde (µmol/mL)	1.57 ± 0.14 c	5.11 ± 0.19 a	3.19 ± 0.18 b	1.23 ± 0.11 c
Plasma corticosterone (ng/mL)	2.16 ± 0.54 c	7.75 ± 0.60 a	4.24 ± 0.52 b	2.88 ± 0.66 c

1All data are presented as means ± SE of 10 samples per treatment group. Means within a row with no common superscripts (a, b, c) significantly differ at P < 0.05. Treatment groups: control, layers were fed on a basal diet and injected with 0.5 mL saline; LPS, layers were fed on a basal diet and injected with 0.5 mL LPS at 8 mg/kg body weight; LPS+LA, layers were fed on a basal diet containing 2×109 CFU/kg LA and injected with 0.5 mL LPS at 8 mg/kg body weight; LA, layers were fed on a basal diet containing 2×109 CFU/kg LA and injected with 0.5 mL saline.

significantly (P < 0.05) improved the egg production rate by 3.1 p.p. and feed conversion ratio by 4.56% in comparison with the control. Moreover, the supplementation of LA to LPS-challenged layers markedly (P < 0.05) alleviated the decrease in feed efficiency and egg production, while it normalized the egg weight and feed intake to similar levels as that in the control group.

Stress Indicators

Table 3 displays the impact of dietary LA inclusion on the stress indicator parameters of laying hens challenged with LPS. Data showed that LA did not affect the stress indicator parameters compared to the control. In contrast, a significant (P< 0.05) increase in the body temperature by 1.7 °C, H/L ratio by 24.6%, plasma MDA concentration by 3.3-fold, and plasma CORT concentration by 3.6-fold, in comparison to the control. Moreover, LA inclusion significantly (P< 0.05) ameliorated the elevation of stress indicators in the LPS-challenged layers by approximately 1.3 °C in the body temperature, 14.1% in the H/L ratio, 37.6% in the MDA, and 45.3% in the CORT, respectively.

Hsp70 Expression

Results showed that dietary LA inclusion and LPS challenge had clear impacts on HSP70 expression in the layer spleen (Figure 1). It was found that LPS induced an over-expression of HSP70 in the challenged layers when

 

compared with the control layers. However, dietary LA inclusion ameliorated the over-expression of HSP70 in the LPS+LA group compared to the LPS-challenged group.

Gsh-Px Activity

Figure 2 illustrates the effects of dietary LA inclusion and LPS injection on the stimulation of intestinal GSH-px activity. Intestinal GSH-px activity did not significantly differ between the control and LPS treatment groups. When compared to the control group, the layers fed on LA showed a substantial (P< 0.05) increase in GSH-px activity by 26.5% and 20.2% in the LPS+LA and LA groups, respectively. Additionally, the GSH-px activity in the LPS+LA group was 13.7% higher (P< 0.05) than that in the LPS treatment group.

 

DISCUSSION

LPS challenge in the present study adversely affected the layer performance traits (Table 2). Similarly, it has been demonstrated that LPS injection reduced the performance of laying hens (Geng et al., 2018; Nie et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2023) and broilers (Csernus et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2008). It was pointed out that feed intake and nutrient’s absorption became very low due to the immunological stress induced by LPS exposure (Han et al., 2016). However, we found that including LA into layer diets enhanced the productive performance and alleviated the deterioration effects when the layers were challenged with LPS injection. Previous research examining the advantages of dietary LA supplementation to laying hens also came to similar conclusions (Alaqil et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2017). The beneficial effects of LA may be linked to lactobacilli’s capacity to sustain gut microbial balance, produce active metabolites, attach to the intestinal mucosa, and antagonize pathogenic bacteria in chickens (Boostani et al., 2013; Trela et al., 2020). It was suggested that LA secrets some active enzymes which improve nutrient absorption and digestion (Jin et al., 2000). Furthermore, LA attenuated the LPS-induced intestinal inflammation through the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) pathway and cytokine/chemokine gene production (Borthakur et al., 2013).

Intravenous injection of E. coli. LPS induced a significant rise in stress indicator parameters (Table 3). Earlier, it was found similar results upon the injection of LPS from Salmonella typhimurium to broiler chickens (Xie et al., 2000). It was reported that the production of endogenous pyrogens and some cytokines from different immune cells causes fever signs after LPS exposure (Nadukkandy et al., 2022). Such pro-inflammatory cytokines were over-produced in the gut, liver, and brain tissues of mice exposed to LPS-induced oxidative stress (Liu et al., 2013). These pro-inflammatory cytokines could explain the increased plasma levels of CORT since they activate the HPA axis which in turn increase the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and CORT concentrations (Silverman et al., 2005). Elevated CORT could be associated with the elevated H/L ratio in the LPS-challenged birds since CORT can directly alter the distribution of leukocyte constituents in the circulation in the way of reproducing essential cells for the nonspecific immune response, such as heterophils (Mehaisen et al., 2017). In line with earlier research (Gou et al., 2015), MDA concentration was increased with LPS injection. Plasma MDA is a major oxidative stress indicator in animal and birds (Pham-Huy et al., 2008). LPS injection caused over expression of HSP70 (Figure 1). It was reported that LPS injection causes plasma, liver, and heart damage through oxidative stress (Lin et al., 2006), and reduces protein functionality (Wang et al., 2009). Exposure of cells to endotoxic stress plays a key factor in inhibiting global protein synthesis and stimulates heat shock protein synthesis (Sukarieh et al., 2009). Therefore, HSP70 is expressed upon exposure to LPS stress to prevent injury, promote recovery, and support resistance to further stresses (Dokladny et al., 2010).

On the other hand, we found that LA significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the stress parameters indicators and alleviated the HSP70 expression in the LPS+LA group compared to the LPS group. Other studies agree with our results and report that probiotics like LA can reduce the HSP70 expression, MDA levels and other stress indicators in chickens (Cengiz et al., 2015; Sohail et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2020). Our results also displayed a significant stimulation in the intestinal GSH-px activity due to LA supplementation in both the LA and LPS+LA groups compared to the control and LPS groups, respectively (Figure 2). These results agree with a previous study (Sun et al., 2020) which concluded that lactobacilli species supplementation to the diets of piglets had the capability to substantially enhance antioxidant enzymes, including GSH-px, activity. GSH-px, one of the cell’s powerful antioxidant enzymes, catalyzes the transformation of superoxide ions into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide. Therefore, it is considered as a biomarker for the oxidative stress (Arthur, 2000). It was explained that probiotic bacilli can enhance the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and GSH-px, which show antimicrobial effect and strong ability to detoxify toxins produced from pathogenic bacteria, and therefore, can recover liver protein synthesis and ameliorate the liver and kidney tissue damage (Gao et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2012). It was found that GSH-px activity was dramatically decreased by oxidative factors in mice, yet both modest and high doses of lactobacillus reversed such effect (Chen et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2021). Moreover, it was manifested that bacilli endospores are lysed during their transit through the gastrointestinal tract and release their intracellular antioxidative constituents, which in turn absorbed from the small intestine and flow to the circulation to extend the potential antioxidant effects (Torres-Maravilla et al., 2022).

In conclusion, our results showed that Hy-line laying hens expressed several stress indicators, such as CORT, MDA, H/L ratio and body temperature elevation, in response to intravenous injection of Escherichia coli LPS. In addition, an increase in HSP70 expression was recorded in the LPS-challenged chickens. These consequences negatively affected the productive performance of the laying hens. The study showed that probiotic LA supplementation into layer diets can stimulate the intestinal GSH-PX activity, alleviate the stress, and neutralize the productive performance of laying hens, especially those challenged with LPS.

acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research and Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia for the financial support provided to conduct and publish the discussed research.

conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

NOVELTY STATEMENT

Chicken eggs have been a considerable component for every-day human food. However, LPS endotoxin stress persuaded by the avian pathogenic Escherichia coli threatens egg production and costs the poultry business significantly in lost revenue. The current study explores the beneficial impacts of dietary enrichment with LA probiotic on alleviating the negative stress indicators induced by LPS challenge in addition to the positive effects on the productive performance of laying hens.

authors contribution

Abdulaziz A. Alaqil contributed to the conceptualization, investigation, data collection, analysis, writing-original draft, reviewing, and approving the current version of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

Abo-Al-Ela H.G., El-Kassas S., El-Naggar K., Abdo S.E., Jahejo A.R., Al Wakeel R.A. (2021). Stress and immunity in poultry: light management and nanotechnology as effective immune enhancers to fight stress. Cell Stress Chaperones. 26: 457. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12192-021-01204-6

Alabi O., Aderemi F., Afolabi D., Alabi B. (2014). Changes in Stress Indicators of Egg-Type Chickens in Response to Different Intensive Housing Systems in Humid Tropics. J. Agricult. Sci. 6: p151. https://doi.org/10.5539/JAS.V6N4P151

Alagar Boopathy L.R., Jacob-Tomas S., Alecki C., Vera M. (2022). Mechanisms tailoring the expression of heat shock proteins to proteostasis challenges. J. Biolog. Chem. 298: 101796. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBC.2022.101796

Alaqil A.A., Abbas A.O., El-Beltagi H.S., Abd El-Atty H.K., Mehaisen G.M.K., Moustafa E.S. (2020). Dietary supplementation of probiotic lactobacillus acidophilus modulates cholesterol levels, immune response, and productive performance of laying hens. Animals. 10: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091588

Arthur J.R. (2000). The glutathione peroxidases. Cellul. Molecul. Life Sci. 57: 1825–1835. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000664/METRICS

Balevi T., An U.S.U., Coskun B., Kurtoglu V., Etingül I.S. (2001). Effect of dietary probiotic on performance and humoral immune response. Br Poult. Sci. 42: 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120073133

Bernardeau M., Vernoux J.P., Henri-Dubernet S., Guéguen M. (2008). Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: the Lactobacillus genus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 126: 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFOODMICRO.2007.08.015

Bertani B., Ruiz N. (2018). Function and Biogenesis of Lipopolysaccharides. EcoSal Plus. 8. https://doi.org/10.1128/ECOSALPLUS.ESP-0001-2018/ASSET/A8443875-5D1F-483A-9B6C-7E045102612E/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ESP-0001-2018_FIG_008.JPG

Blas J. (2015). Stress in Birds, in: Scanes, C.G. (Ed.), Sturkie’s Avian Physiology: Academic Press, New York, pp. 769–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407160-5.00033-6

Boostani A., Mahmoodian Fard H.R., Ashayerizadeh A., Aminafshar M. (2013). Growth performance, carcass yield and intestinal microflora populations of broilers fed diets containing thepax and yogurt. Rev. Bras Cienc. Avic. 15: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2013000100001

Borthakur A., Bhattacharyya S., Kumar A., Anbazhagan A.N., Tobacman J.K., Dudeja P.K. (2013). Lactobacillus acidophilus Alleviates Platelet-Activating Factor-Induced Inflammatory Responses in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. PLoS One. 8: 75664. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0075664

Bos M.P., Robert V., Tommassen J. (2007). Biogenesis of the gram-negative bacterial outer membrane. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61: 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.MICRO.61.080706.093245

Bradford M.M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72; 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

Candela M., Perna F., Carnevali P., Vitali B., Ciati R., Gionchetti P., Rizzello F., Campieri M., Brigidi P. (2008). Interaction of probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains with human intestinal epithelial cells: Adhesion properties, competition against enteropathogens and modulation of IL-8 production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 125: 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFOODMICRO.2008.04.012

Cengiz Ö., Köksal B.H., Tatll O., Sevim Ö., Ahsan U., Üner A.G., Ulutaş P.A., Beyaz D., Büyükyörük S., Yakan A., Önol A.G. (2015). Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers. Poult. Sci. 94: 2395–2403. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS/PEV194

Chen L., Pan D.D., Zhou J., Jiang Y.Z. (2005). Protective effect of selenium-enriched Lactobacillus on CCl4-induced liver injury in mice and its possible mechanisms. World J. Gastroenterol. 11: 5795–5800. https://doi.org/10.3748/WJG.V11.I37.5795

Csernus B., Biró S., Babinszky L., Komlósi I., Jávor A., Stündl L., Remenyik J., Bai P., Oláh J., Pesti-Asbóth G., Czeglédi, L. (2020). Effect of carotenoids, oligosaccharides and anthocyanins on growth performance, immunological parameters and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Animals. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020347

De Boever S., Beyaert R., Vandemaele F., Baert K., Duchateau L., Goddeeris B., De Backer P., Croubels S. (2008). The influence of age and repeated lipopolysaccharide administration on body temperature and the concentration of interleukin-6 and IgM antibodies against lipopolysaccharide in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 37: 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450701784875

De Cesare A., Sirri F., Manfreda G., Moniaci P., Giardini A., Zampiga M., Meluzzi A. (2017). Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens. PLoS One. 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176309

Dokladny K., Lobb R., Wharton W., Ma T.Y., Moseley P.L. (2010). LPS-induced cytokine levels are repressed by elevated expression of HSP70 in rats: possible role of NF-kappaB. Cell Stress Chaperones. 15: 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12192-009-0129-6

French C.E., Sales M.A., Rochell S.J., Rodriguez A., Erf G.F. (2020). Local and systemic inflammatory responses to lipopolysaccharide in broilers: new insights using a two-window approach. Poult. Sci. 99: 6593–6605. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSJ.2020.09.078

Gallazzi D., Giardini A., Mangiagalli G.M., Marelli S., Ferrazzi V., Orsi C., Cavalchini G.L. (2008). Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL on laying hen performance. Ital J. Anim. Sci. 7: 27–37. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2008.27

Gao X., Ma Q., Zhao L., Lei Y., Shan Y., Ji C. (2011). Isolation of Bacillus subtilis: Screening for aflatoxins B1, M1, and G1 detoxification. Euro. Food Res. Technol. 232: 957–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00217-011-1463-3/TABLES/4

Gehad A.E., Lillehoj H.S., Hendricks G.L., Mashaly M.M. (2002). Initiation of humoral immunity. I. The role of cytokines and hormones in the initiation of humoral immunity using T-independent and T-dependent antigens. Dev Comp. Immunol. 26: 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-305X(02)00020-4

Geng Y., Ma Q., Wang Z., Guo Y. (2018). Dietary vitamin D3 supplementation protects laying hens against lipopolysaccharide-induced immunological stress. Nutr. Metab. (Lond). 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-018-0293-8

Gou Z., Jiang S., Zheng C., Tian Z., Lin X (2015). Equol Inhibits LPS-Induced Oxidative Stress and Enhances the Immune Response in Chicken HD11 Macrophages. Cellul. Physiol. Biochem. 36: 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1159/000430124

Habashy W.S., Milfort M.C., Rekaya R., Aggrey S.E. (2019). Cellular antioxidant enzyme activity and biomarkers for oxidative stress are affected by heat stress. Int. J. Biometeorol. 63: 1569–1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01769-z

Han F., Lu Z., Liu Y., Xia X., Zhang H., Wang X., Wang Y. (2016). Cathelicidin-BF ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal epithelial barrier disruption in rat. Life Sci. 152: 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LFS.2016.03.041

Jin L.Z., Ho Y.W., Abdullah N., Jalaludin S. (2000). Digestive and bacterial enzyme activities in broilers fed diets supplemented with Lactobacillus cultures. Poult. Sci. 79: 886–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.6.886

Kurtoglu V., Kurtoglu F., Seker E., Coskun B., Balevi T., Polat E.S. (2004). Effect of probiotic supplementation on laying hen diets on yield performance and serum and egg yolk cholesterol. Food Addit Contam 21, 817–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030310001639530

Lin H., Decuypere E., Buyse J. (2006). Acute heat stress induces oxidative stress in broiler chickens. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 144: 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CBPA.2006.01.032

Liu F., Gao Y., Jiao J., Zhang Y., Li J., Ding L., Zhang L., Chen Z., Song X., Yang G., Yu J., Wu J. (2023). Upregulation of TLR4-Dependent ATP Production Is Critical for Glaesserella parasuis LPS-Mediated Inflammation. Cells 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/CELLS12050751

Liu X. qiu Hu, X. jian, Xu H.X., Zeng X.Y. (2013). Xiaochaihu Decoction attenuates the vicious circle between the oxidative stress and the ALP inactivation through LPS-catecholamines interactions in gut, liver and brain during CCI4+ethanol-induced mouse HCC. BMC. Complement. Altern. Med. 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-375

Lu S., Wei F., Li G. (2021). The evolution of the concept of stress and the framework of the stress system. Cell Stress 5, 76. https://doi.org/10.15698/CST2021.06.250

Ma Q.G., Gao X., Zhou T., Zhao L.H., Fan Y., Li X.Y., Lei Y.P., Ji C., Zhang J.Y. (2012). Protective effect of Bacillus subtilis ANSB060 on egg quality, biochemical and histopathological changes in layers exposed to aflatoxin B1. Poult. Sci. 91: 2852–2857. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS.2012-02474

Mehaisen G.M.K.K., Eshak M.G., Elkaiaty A.M., Atta A.-R.R.M.M.A.-R.M.M., Mashaly M.M., Abass A.O. (2017). Comprehensive growth performance, immune function, plasma biochemistry, gene expressions and cell death morphology responses to a daily corticosterone injection course in broiler chickens. PLoS One. 12: 172684. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172684

Moura L.N., Neumann E., Vieira L.Q., Nicoli J.R. (2001). Protection by Lactobacillus acidophilus UFV-H2B20 against experimental oral infection with Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Ser. Typhimurium in gnotobiotic and conventional mice. Brazilian J. Microbiol. 32: 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822001000100015

Muchacka R., Sosnówka-Czajka E., Skomorucha I., Kapusta E., Greń A. (2018). The activity of antioxidant enzymes in blood plasma and eggs of laying hens kept in various rearing systems during the summer heat period. Euro. Poult. Sci. 82: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2018.240

Nadukkandy P., Balachandran M.K., Valappil M.P. (20220. Assessment of inflammatory response on pyrogenic induction by in vitro and in vivo methods. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 12: 7668–7684. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC126.76687684

Nie W., Wang B., Gao J., Guo Y., Wang Z. (2018). Effects of dietary phosphorous supplementation on laying performance, egg quality, bone health and immune responses of laying hens challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0271-z

Nissen L., Chingwaru W., Sgorbati B., Biavati B., Cencic A. (2009). Gut health promoting activity of new putative probiotic/protective Lactobacillus spp. strains: a functional study in the small intestinal cell model. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 135: 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJFOODMICRO.2009.08.027

Oelschlaeger T.A. (2010). Mechanisms of probiotic actions - A review. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300: 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMM.2009.08.005

Pham-Huy L.A., He H., Pham-Huy C. (2008). Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int. J. Biomed. Sci.

Reisinger N., Emsenhuber C., Doupovec B., Mayer E., Schatzmayr G., Nagl V., Grenier B. (2020). Endotoxin Translocation and Gut Inflammation Are Increased in Broiler Chickens Receiving an Oral Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Bolus during Heat Stress. Toxins. 12, Page 622 12: 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/TOXINS12100622

Salarmoini M., Fooladi M.H. (2011). Efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus as Probiotic to Improve Broiler Chicks Performance. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 13: 165–172.

Silverman M.N., Pearce B.D., Biron C.A., Miller A.H. (2005). Immune Modulation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis during Viral Infection. Viral Immunol. 18: 41. https://doi.org/10.1089/VIM.2005.18.41

Sohail M.U., Ijaz A., Yousaf M.S., Ashraf K., Zaneb H., Aleem M., Rehman H. (2010). Alleviation of cyclic heat stress in broilers by dietary supplementation of mannan-oligosaccharide and Lactobacillus-based probiotic: Dynamics of cortisol, thyroid hormones, cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and humoral immunity. Poult. Sci. 89: 1934–1938. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS.2010-00751

Sukarieh R., Sonenberg N., Pelletier J. (2009). The eIF4E-binding proteins are modifiers of cytoplasmic eIF4E relocalization during the heat shock response. Am J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 296. https://doi.org/10.1152/AJPCELL.00511.2008

Sun Z., Li H., Li Y., Qiao J. (2020). Lactobacillus salivarius, a Potential Probiotic to Improve the Health of LPS-Challenged Piglet Intestine by Alleviating Inflammation as Well as Oxidative Stress in a Dose-Dependent Manner During Weaning Transition. Front Vet. Sci. 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/FVETS.2020.547425

Tang S.G.H., Sieo C.C., Ramasamy K., Saad W.Z., Wong H.K., Ho Y.W. (2017). Performance, biochemical and haematological responses, and relative organ weights of laying hens fed diets supplemented with prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic. BMC Vet. Res. 13: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12917-017-1160-Y/TABLES/5

Torres-Maravilla E., Reyes-Pavón D., Benítez-Cabello A., González-Vázquez R., Ramírez-Chamorro L.M., Langella P., Bermúdez-Humarán L.G. (2022). Strategies for the Identification and Assessment of Bacterial Strains with Specific Probiotic Traits. Microorganisms. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS10071389

Trela J., Kierończyk B., Hautekiet V., Józefiak D. (2020). Combination of bacillus licheniformis and salinomycin: Effect on the growth performance and git microbial populations of broiler chickens. Animals. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050889

Wang J., Ding X., Zeng Q., Bai S., Zhang K., Mao X., Xu S., Zhuo Y., Xuan Y., Peng H., Liu J., Yin H. (2023). Dietary 25-hydroxyvitamin D improves productive performance and intestinal health of laying hens under Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide challenge. Poult. Sci. 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102371

Wang J., Ishfaq M., Guo Y., Chen C., Li J. (2020). Assessment of Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus salivarius Isolated From Chickens as Feed Additives. Front Vet. Sci. 7: 415. https://doi.org/10.3389/FVETS.2020.00415/BIBTEX

Wang R.R., Pan X.J., Peng Z.Q. (2009). Effects of heat exposure on muscle oxidation and protein functionalities of pectoralis majors in broilers. Poult. Sci. 88: 1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.3382/PS.2008-00094

Wu B., Cui H., Peng X., Fang J., Zuo Z., Deng J., Huang J. (2013). Dietary nickel chloride induces oxidative intestinal damage in broilers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health. 10: 2109–2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10062109

Wu Z., Pan D., Jiang M., Sang L., Chang B. (2021). Selenium-Enriched Lactobacillus acidophilus Ameliorates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Chronic Colitis in Mice by Regulating Inflammatory Cytokines and Intestinal Microbiota. Front Med (Lausanne) 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMED.2021.716816

Xie H., Rath N.C., Huff G.R., Huff W.E., Balog J.M. (2000). Effects of Salmonella typhimurium lipopolysaccharide on broiler chickens. Poult Sci 79, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/PS/79.1.33

Yang X., Guo Y., He X., Yuan J., Yang Y., Wang Z. (2008). Growth performance and immune responses in chickens after challenge with lipopolysaccharide and modulation by dietary different oils. Animal 2, 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107001188

Zhang J., Han H., Zhang L., Wang T. (2021). Dietary bisdemethoxycurcumin supplementation attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced damages on intestinal redox potential and redox status of broilers. Poult. Sci. 100: 101061. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSJ.2021.101061