Population Survey of Natural Enemies of Bactrocera Flies from Mango and Guava Septic Fruits of Sindh Region
Research Article
Population Survey of Natural Enemies of Bactrocera Flies from Mango and Guava Septic Fruits of Sindh Region
Zain-ul-Aabdin Abro1*, Naheed Baloch1, Raza Muhammad Memon2, Niaz Hussain Khuhro2 and Waseem Akbar Qazi2
1Department of Zoology University of Sindh Jamshoro, Pakistan; 2Nuclear Institute of Agriculture (NIA) Tando Jam, Pakistan.
Abstract | Bactrocera flies are noxious pests of fruits mainly infecting guava and mango in Sindh. Bactrocera zonata and Bactrocera dorsalis are the deleterious pests of several plant species. Trybliographa daci (Weld.) and Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) are natural enemies of fruit flies widely used as bio-agents in biological control programs against Bactrocera species. In current investigations we inspected the infected guava and mango fruits from lower (Hyderabad) and upper (Larkana) Sindh regions for population surveillance of parasitoids during 2019. The results shown (P<0.05) maximum number of Trybliographa daci were (55.60±4.52, 46.40±5.47) obtained from guava infested fruits of both regions. Moreover, Maximum number of Bactrocera zonata were emerged from infected guava (381.00±10.85, 259.40±16.95) collected from lower and upper regions of Sindh. The current studies recognised that larval cum pupal parasitoid Trybliographa daci could be effective in controlling population of Bactrocera spp. in orchard agro-ecosystem of Sindh region.
Received | April 20, 2022; Accepted | August 10, 2022; Published | October 15, 2022
*Correspondence | Zain-ul-Aabdin Abro, Department of Zoology University of Sindh Jamshoro, Pakistan; Email: zainabro128@gmail.com
Citation | Abro, Z.A., N. Baloch, R.M. Memon, N.H. Khuhro and W.A. Qazi. 2022. Population survey of natural enemies of Bactrocera flies from mango and guava septic fruits of Sindh region. Journal of Innovative Sciences, 8(2): 155-159.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jis/2022.8.2.155.159
Keywords | Bactrocera flies, Natural enemies, Infected fruits, Agro-ecosystem, Sindh region
Copyright: 2022 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1. Introduction
Fruit flies of genus Bactrocera are unquestionably the most notorious pests of fruits and vegetables all over Asia and World. Bactrocera species are known as constant destructive pests of various fruit verities (Wang, 1996). The peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) and oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) are polyphagous pests and predominantly infesting peach, guava and mango (CABI/EPPO, 2001). Both Bactrocera species are major pests in India and Pakistan (Qureshi et al., 1996). According to available literature B. zonata is more significant pest species in Pakistan compared to B. dorsalis (Siddiqui et al., 2003; Sarwar et al., 2014; Abro et al., 2020). Fruit flies inflict 210 million US dollars and an estimated 190 million Euro damages of fruits in a year (USDA, 2016). Pakistan exported mango to 52 countries and second country in exporting mangoes worldwide. The guava of Pakistan is also famous for their particular taste and aroma (SU Magazine, 2018). Bio-control technology is an eco-friendly pest control technique to manage insect pests by using natural enemies (Cancino et al., 2008). Several species of fruit fly parasitoids such as egg parasitoids, larval/pre-pupal parasitoids, pupal parasitoids have been extensively used against fruit fly species as bio-agents (Segura et al., 2006). Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) and Trybliographa daci (Weld.) along with other species of parasitoids of dipteran flies successively mass reared and released in Argentina for suppression of Bactrocera species in various orchards (Senasa-Procem, 2000).The rearing of these parasitoids on Bactrocera spp. had been effectively implemented for execution of area-wide management strategy to control Bactrocera flies in expansion of national fruit fly control programme (Guillen and Sanchez, 2007).
The mass rearing of fruit flies along with rearing of their parasitoids especially Trybliographa daci and D. longicaudata is an ongoing process at Fruit Flies and their parasitoids laboratories, Plant Protection Division, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture (NIA), Tando Jam, Sindh. Our main focus of this study was to evaluate the population of natural enemies parasitizing Bactrocera flies in Sindh region in order to check their prevalence and persistence along with sustenance in various orchard agro-ecosystems as bio-control components.
2. Materials and Methods
The infested fruits from guava and mango orchards of Lower (Hyderabad) and Upper (Larkana) regions of Sindh Province were collected for population status of Bactrocera flies parasitoids.
The infected guava and mango were collected during 2019 and brought to Fruit Flies and their parasitoid laboratory, under controlled conditions at 28±2 ºC and relative humidity 60±2 %. NIA, Tando Jam.
The infected fruits were put on cleaned saw dust (pupation substrate) in plastic trays sheltered with fine wire mesh to avoid infestation of other organisms. The observations were made on number of adult fruit flies emerged from unparasitized pupae and number of larval cum pupal parasitoids emerged from parasitized larvae.
The emerged Bactrocera flies were transferred in steel framed cages (80 ×72 × 80 cm) and parasitoids were placed in separate cages (45 × 40 × 40 cm) provided with artificial diet.
2.1 Ingredients of artificial diets
Sugar: Casein Protein: Water at 1:2:4 ratio (For adult fruit flies)
Casein protein: Yeast extract: Sugar at 2:1:2 ratio. (For adult fruit flies)
Water soaked cotton in Petri dishes (For adult fruit flies)
Honey + Water soaked cotton in Petri dishes (For Parasitoids).
2.2 Statistical analysis
Statistix® Version 8.1, Analytical Software, Inc., and Tallahassee, FL, USA was used for statistical analyses.
Two-ways ANOVA for different parameters were performed followed by Fisher’s (LSD) Test to check the significance.
3. Results and Discussion
The surveillance results for prevalence and abundance of natural enemies of Bactrocera species has shown (P<0.05) higher number of pre-pupal parasitoid Trybliographa daci (55.60±4.52,46.40±5.47) were observed in infected guava collected from lower (Hyderabad) followed by upper (Larkana) regions of Sindh Province. Similarly, significantly (P<0.05) maximum number of B. zonata (381.00±10.85, 259.40±16.95) were obtained from infected guava collection of (Hyderabad) followed by upper (Larkana) regions. Whereas, minimum number of (30.80±3.38, 18.20±1.07) Diachasmimorpha longicaudata were recorded from septic mangoes of both regions. Likewise, reduced number of (198.80±8.10, 166.60±14.75) B. dorsalis was also observed from infested mangoes collected during field visits from both regions Table 1.
Overall maximum infestation of Bactrocera zonata found in guava fruits of both regions. However, higher abundance of larval/pupal parasitoid Trybliographa daci were emerged from infested guava of upper and lower region of Sindh (Figure 1 and 2).
The fruit flies and their parasitoids emergence varied significantly from infested guava of Larkana and Hyderabad (F= 105; DF = 3, 16, 19; P= 0.0000), (F= 571; DF= 3, 16, 19; P = 0.0000) while from infested Mango of Larkana (F= 102; DF= 3, 16, 19; P= 0.0000) and Hyderabad (F= 125; DF= 3, 16, 19; P= 0.0000) slight variance were observed in emergence of insects according to statistical values given above.
Table 1: Number (Mean±SE) of Bactrocera species and their bio-control agents recorded from infected guava and mango fruits of lower and upper regions of Sindh.
Location and fruit |
Fruit fly species |
Parasitoid species |
|||
B. zonata |
B. dorsalis |
T. daci |
D. longicaudata |
||
Hyderabad |
Guava |
381.00±10.85 a |
300.60±8.38 b |
55.60±4.52 c |
35.80±1.71 c |
Mango |
291.60±20.56 a |
198.80±8.10 b |
43.00±2.81 c |
30.80±3.38 c |
|
Larkana |
Guava |
259.40±16.95 a |
179.00±12.20 b |
46.40±5.47 c |
25.40±1.94 c |
Mango |
230.00±14.14 a |
166.60±14.75 b |
31.40±1.78 c |
18.20±1.07 c |
Values with the same letters are not significantly different according to Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at (P < 0.05).
Several surveys on population abundance of fruit flies have been done so far but no noticeable work on population monitoring of its parasitoids has been reported from Sindh. However, our results are in lined with that by (Abro et al., 2019) who conducted surveillance studies for fruit flies parasitoids from said region. Yet other authors (Wong et al., 1987, 1991) observed maximum parasitization of Diachasmimorpha tryoni along with maximum infestation of B. dorsalis and C. capitata from Kula Maui area of Hawaii. Furthermore, (Sivinski et al., 1996) suppressed Anastrepha suspensa population by augmentative releases of Diachasmimorpha longicaudata in contradiction we have found T. daci more effective in suppressing population of Bactrocera species. Our results are in agreement with those by (Vargas et al., 2002) who conducted surveys on comparative demography of six parasitoids species. The maximum infestation of B. zonata were recorded in guava, likewise (Abro et al., 2021) also investigated more population of B. zonata in guava orchards of Sindh.
We suggested the application of bio-control in orchards to eradicate fruit flies population. Similarly, it has been advocated Baeza et al. (2002) and Hendrichs et al. (2009) as the use of natural enemies for improving trade and safety. Still more investigations on survey of bio-control agents to assess their prevalence and perseverance in agro-ecological conditions of Sindh are the need of time for bio-control base IPM.
Conclusion and Recommendation
The pre-pupal parasitoid Trybliographa daci were discovered as dexterous bio-control agent in agro-ecological conditions of Sindh.
Guava were observed as most preferred host by Bactrocera zonata and Bactrocera dorsalis as compared to mango in Sindh region.
Surveillance studies for the assessment Fruit fly parasitoids from infested fruits should be extended to develop parasitoids culture in the laboratory for biological control in the sustainable pest management.
Novelty Statement
The purpose of this survey was to document availability of biological control agents from different climatic conditions of Sindh. However, no prominent work on prevalence of Diachasmimorpha longicaudata and Trybliographa daci has been done or published so far from the region.
Author’s Contribution
Zain-ul-Aabdin Abro: Performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the article.
Naheed Baloch: Supervised the study.
Raza Muhammad Memon: Conceived the study.
Niaz Hussain Khuhro: Designed the experiment.
Waseem Akbar Qazi: Helped in data collection.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Abro, Z.A., Baloch, N., Memon, R.M., and Khuhro, N.H., 2021. Population fluctuations of Bactrocera zonata and Bactrocera dorsalis in guava orchard agro-ecosystem in Sindh Region. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 53(5): 1969-1972. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20191012081034
Abro, Z.A., Baloch, N., Memon, R.M., Khuhro, N.H., and Soomro, Q.A., 2019. Surveillance and Documentation of fruit flies parasitoids from infested fruits collected from district Larkana and Hyderabad. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: B. Life and Environmental Sciences, 56(2): 43–46.
Abro, Z.A., Baloch, N., Memon, R.M., Khuhro, N.H., and Soomro, Q.A., 2020. Population variations of fruit flies, Bactrocera spp. in mango orchards of Hyderabad and Larkana, Sindh. Journal of Pure and Applied Biology, 9(1): 949-955. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2020.90099
Baeza-Larios, G., Sivinski, J., Holler, T., and Aluja, M., 2002. The Effects of Chilling on the Fecundity and Life Span of Mass-Reared Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology, 12: 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150120124469
CABI/EPPO. 2001. Bactrocera zonata. Distribution Maps of Pests no. 125 (2nd revision). CAB International, Wallingford (GB).
Cancino, J., Ruiz, L., Sivinski, J., Galvez, F., and Aluja, M., 2008. Rearing of five hymenopterous larval-prepupal (braconidae, figitidae) and three pupal (diapriidae, chalcidoidea, eurytomidae) native parasitoids of the genus Anastrepha (Diptera:Tephritidae) on Irradiated A. ludens Larvae and Pupae. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 18: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150802377423
Guillen, D., and Sanchez, R., 2007. Expansion of the National fruit fly control programme in Argentina in area-wide control of insect pests from research to field implementation, (eds. M.J.B. Vreysen, A.S. Robinson and J. Hendrichs). The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 653-660. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6059-5_60
Hendrichs, J., Bloem, K., Hoch, G., Carpenter, J.E., Greany, P., and Robinson, A.S., 2009. Improving the cost-effectiveness, trade and safety of biological control for agricultural insect pests using nuclear techniques. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 19(1): 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150902985620
Personal Communication with Scientists and Farmers of both Zones, 2018. Published in SU Magazine, 26: 12.
Qureshi, Z., Hussain, T., Carey, J.R., and Dowell, R.V., 1993. Effects of temperature on development of Bactrocera zonata. Pan-Pacific Entomologist., 69: 71–76.
Sarwar, M., Hamed, M., Yousaf, M., and Hussain, M., 2014. Surveillance on population dynamics and fruits infestation of Tephritid fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in mango (Mangifera indica L.) Orchards of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Intl. J. Sci. Res. Environ. Sci., 2: 113-119. https://doi.org/10.12983/ijsres-2014-p0113-0119
Segura, D.F., Vera, M.T., Cagnotti, C., Vaccaro, N., De Coll, O., Ovruski, S.M., and Cladera, J.L. 2006. Relative abundance of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in diverse host species and localities of Argentina. Annals of Entomological Society of America, 99: 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2006)099[0070:RAOCCA]2.0.CO;2
Senasa-Procem. 2000. Situacion actual del programa nacional de moscas de los frutos (PROCEM) en argentina in abstracts II taller internacional de moscas de los frutos, buenos aires, Argentina, pp. ii.
Siddiqui, Q., Ahmad, N., Rashdi, S.M.M.S., and Niazi, S., 2003. Effect of time of the day and trap height on the catches of peach/guava fruit flies, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) through male annihilation technique. Asian J. Plant Sci., 2: 228-232. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2003.228.232
Sivinski, J.M., Calkins, C.O., Baranowski, R., Harris, D., Brambila, J., Diaz, J., Burns, R.E., Holler, T., and Dodson, G., 1996. Suppression of a Caribbean fruit fly (Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) Diptera: Tephritidae) population through augmented releases of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biological Control. 6: 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1996.0022
USDA Report. 2016. A review of recorded host plants of oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Version 2.1. A product of the USDA Compendium of Fruit Fly Host Information (CoFFHI). A Farm Bill Project.
Vargas, R.I., Ramadan, M., Hussain, T., Mochizuki, N., Bautista, R.C., and Stark, J.D., 2002. Comparative demography of six fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biological Control, 25: 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00046-4
Wang, X.J., 1996. The fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of the East Asian region. Acta Zool. Sin., 21: 52.
Wong, T.T.Y., and Ramadan, M.M., 1987. Parasitization of the Mediterranean and oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the Kula area of Maui, Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology, 80: 77-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/80.1.77
Wong, T.T.Y., Ramadan, M.M., McInnis, D.O., Mochizuki, N., Nishimoto, J.A., and Herr, J.C., 1991. Augmentative releases of Diachasmimorpha tryoni (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to suppress a Mediterranean fruit fly population in Kula Maui, Hawaii. Biological Control, 1: 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/1049-9644(91)90094-G
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?