Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Neuroprotective Effects of Melatonin Against Neurotoxicity Induced by Intrahippocampal Injection of Aluminum in Male Wistar Rats: Possible Involvement of Oxidative Stress Pathway

Neuroprotective Effects of Melatonin Against Neurotoxicity Induced by Intrahippocampal Injection of Aluminum in Male Wistar Rats: Possible Involvement of Oxidative Stress Pathway

Oussama Zghari*, Mouloud Lamtai, Sofia Azirar, Mohamed Yassine El-Brouzi, Hajar Benmhammed, Aboubaker El-Hessni, Ali Ouichou, Abdelhalem Mesfioui

Laboratory of Biology and Health, Neurosciences, Neuroimmunology and Behaviour Unit, Faculty of Science, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco. 

 
*Correspondence | Oussama Zghari, Laboratory of Biology and Health, Neurosciences, Neuroimmunology and Behaviour Unit, Faculty of Science, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco; Email: zghari.oussama.91@gmail.com, oussama.zghari@uit.ac.ma

Figure 1:

Experimental design of all methodological steps of the study. (A) Sample description of experimental groups and exposure to NaCl (0.9%) or AlCl3; (B) after the intrahippocampal injection, rats were submitted to the behavioral tests assessment through Open Field test (OFT), Elevated Plus Maze (EPM), Forced Swimming Test (FST), Y-maze and Morris Water Maze (MWM) test; (C) The animals were euthanized and the hippocampus was taken; (D) Thereafter, oxidative stress markers (lipid peroxidation (LPO), nitric oxide (NO) levels, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities) and (E) histology of CA3 area of the hippocampus were evaluated.

Figure 2:

Effect of treatment with Aluminum (2 mg/kg), melatonin (4 mg/kg), and their combination on immobility time (TIM) expressed in seconds in forced swimming test in male Wistar rats. Results are represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. control group; and #p < 0.05 vs. Al-treated group.

Figure 3:

Effects of Al (2 mg/kg) and melatonin (4 mg/kg) on percentage of alternation measured in Y-maze test in male Wistar rats. Results are represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. control group; and #p < 0.05 vs. Al-treated group.

Figure 4:

Effects of Al (2 mg/kg) and melatonin (4 mg/kg) on memory performance measured in MWM test in male Wistar rats. (A) Latency to reach the hidden platform on each of the 4 days of learning phase. (B) Percentage of time spent in the correct quadrant. Results are represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. control group; and #p < 0.05 vs. Al-treated group.

Figure 5:

Effect of Al (2 mg/kg), MEL (4 mg/kg) and Al+MEL on the number of neurons in 0.18 mm2 area of CA3 region of hippocampus in male rats. Results are represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. control group; and #p < 0.05 vs. Al-treated group.

Figure 6:

Light micrographs of hippocampus with cresyl violet staining in the control (A), MEL (B), Al (C) and Al+MEL (D) groups in CA3 cell layer of hippocampus in male rats. Bar represents 100μm.

Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences

May

Vol. 12, Iss. 5, pp. 802-993

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe