Research Article

Managing the Growth and Flower Production of Zinnia (Zinnia elegans) through Benzyle Amino Purine (BAP) Application and Pinching

Sajid Ali1, Abdul Basit1,3*, Abdul Mateen Khattak1, Syed Tanveer Shah1, Izhar Ullah2, Noor Alam Khan3, Imran Ahmad1, Kamran Rauf1, Salman Khan1, Irfan Ullah1 and Intizar Ahmad1

1Department of Horticulture, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; 2Department of Horticulture, Ondokuz Mayis University, 55200, Samsun-Turkey; 3Directorate of Floriculture, National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Received | June 26, 2019; Accepted | December 14, 2020; Published | February 08, 2021

*Correspondence | Abdul Basit, Department of Horticulture, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Citation | Ali, S., A. Basit, A.M. Khattak, S.T. Shah, I. Ullah, N.A. Khan, I. Ahmad, K. Rauf, S. Khan, I. Ullah and I. Ahmad. 2021. Managing the growth and flower production of zinnia (Zinnia elegans) through Benzyle Amino Purine (BAP) application and pinching. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 34(1): 29-40.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2021/34.1.29.40

Keywords | Pinching, Apical dominance, BAP, Adaptability, Antagonistic effect

Introduction

Zinnia (Zinnia elegans) belongs to family Asteraceae is originated from Mexico. The leaves are opposite and stalk less. The flowers may have a single row of petals or attain the shape of a dome with purple, lilac and red color. The plants are mostly raised from seeds. Zinnia is used as a cut flower, bedding or pot plant. The reasons of its commercial importance are long shelf life, vast marketing as a cut flower and availability in various shapes and colors (Dole, 1999). Zinnia can withstand arid and hot climatic conditions thus making it appropriate for growing in all conditions with the exception of poorly aerated soils, which may cause root diseases (Reilly, 1978). Zinnia can also be grown as an intercrop in most of the vegetables for the control of nematodes (Yassin and Ismail, 1994). Zinnia is native flower of America which was originated from Central America and Mexico. In Pakistan, zinnia is a flower of summer season, which produce flowering during May-October. Continous flowering with a good quality is depending upon sowing of seeds on time, development and growth of plants, and the flowering behavior of different cultivars (Javid et al., 2005).

Growth inhibitor have great effect in the development and physiology of plants. They almost stunted the stem and also affect the reproductive habit of plants. Stunting growth chemicals depends on method use for treatment of plants may be (foliar application or soil application). It also depends on the type of species and cultivar (Pobudkiewicz, 2008). It enhances branching in floricultural crops in broad. Although having great impact on plants branching at the time of the application. Efficient response of BAP has a short-term response and has no harmful effects in the plant. Therefore, multiple applications of BAP have positive effect on crops. Through coverage of BAP is required so it is well translocated in the plant (Latimer, 1991). Cytokinins applied exogenously have the same effect as pinching in plants. Most of the studies showed auxins and cytokinins might control the apical dominance antagonistically. Effective use of growth regulators of plants is a way to control height of plant (Krug, 2004). BAP belongs to group of cytokinin and is an aromatic compound that stimulates plants to produce lateral branching providing a bushy appearance to the plant. Due to its antagonistic effect to auxin BAP counter the epical dominance while reducing height of plant (Pobudkiewicz, 2008). Applying BAP directly may cause stimulation of growth and cell division in dormant buds while improving the bushiness of plant (Taiz and Zeiger, 2010). Cytokinins like BAP are capable of enhancing branching with the exception of any disadvantages, predominantly stunted growth (Carpenter and Rodriguez, 1971).

Auxins perform a significant role in epical dominance induction by inhibiting lateral bud growth. In auxiliary buds, auxins levels primarily increase later when plant pinching is done and then becomes stable (Gocel et al., 1991). Fresh weight of the buds increases even though auxins alone cannot control auxiliary bud improvement. Furthermore, due to pinching the cytokinins content also improve (Mader et al., 2003a). During pinching, the apical buds are detached from the plants, while the auxiliary buds are left only to support and improve branching laterally. The apical portions of seedlings are removed in order to support lateral branching and keeping them small and rigid (Bashir and Bantel, 1994). Indirect inhibition of axillary bud growth is indirectly enhanced by a relation in between auxin concentration in epical buds and the epical dominance. After pinching, auxins and cytokinins concentrations in axillary buds increase (Gocal et al., 1991). Pinching of terminal buds (containing hormones) allow lateral buds to develop and grow like compact flourishing plants with a better flowering yield (Mader et al., 2003b). Keeping in view the importance of BAP application and pinching at different leaf stage the present research work was designed to check their effect on the growth and quality flower production.

 

Materials and Methods

Experimental site and design

The present research study was conducted at Ornamental Nursery, Department of Horticulture, The University of Agriculture Peshawar Pakistan. The research site is located at 340m altitude above the sea level with a latitude of 34.01o N and longitude of 71.52o E which is considered as a subtropical region on the basis of its climate. Peshawar is well known by both its prolonged hot summers (max temp 45-47oC) and severe cool winters with a fall in temperature up to 4oC. Both the summer and winter are extreme. March is counted for highest rainfall of approximately 78mm while the lowest rainfall occurs during the month of June (8mm) with an approximate location of 1600km from north of Indian Ocean (Ahmad et al., 2019; Basit et al., 2019; Sajid et al., 2020).

Randomized complete block design with three replications and factor factorial arrangement was used in the experiment. Treatments combination consisted factor A (B0= control, B1= 25 mgl-1, B2= 50 mgl-1, B3=75 mgl-1, B4=100 mgl-1) and factor B (P0 = No pinching (control), P1= 2 leaf stage, P2= 4 leaf stage, P3= 6 leaf stage.

Experimental procedure

Zinnia seeds of a local cultivar were sown in module trays in the Ornamental Nursery under semi shade lath house. Sprinkler irrigation was done on daily basis to get better germination and healthy seedlings. The seedlings developed were transplanted after 17 days and all the basic cultural practices i.e. weeding and irrigation were carried out on regular basis. A total of 10 plants were kept in each treatment. The data collection was started from first day as flowering initiated. Normally cultural practices i.e. fertilizer application, irrigation, weeding and hoeing were done on regular basis.

Parameters studied

Data regarding all parameters were taken and their averages were calculated. The attributes studied included plant height that was measured from the base of plant soil up to plant tip through a measuring tape. Diameter (mm) of stem was calculated at the base or plant while using Vernier caliper as reported by (Basit et al., 2019b; Kamkari et al., 2016). Number of branches were counted at flowering stage and the number of leaves were taken as well. Days to flowering were taken by counting the total days from the day of transplantation to initiation of first flower. Number of flowers were counted and their diameter (cm) were taken with the help of Vernier caliper at both opposite sides of the flowers. Flowers’ persistency were taken on the base of initial flower opening up to their senescence. Flowers’ fresh weight was taken through a digital weight balance (Model AY220, Shimadzu, Japan) (Basit et al., 2020). Whereas, dry weight of flowers was determined initially by drying the flowers at 40oC for 24 hrs with circulated air until a constant weight was achieved.

Statistical analysis

Data for different attributes were analyzed by using a statistical package, Statistix 8.1, Inc, Tallahassee FL, USA) as suggested by Basit et al. (2018). Further, mean values were subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) suitable for Randomized Complete Block Design (Gilani et al., 2018) and assessed through least significant difference (LSD) test (Jan et al., 2009).

 

Results and Discussion

Plant height (cm)

Data analysis of showed that maximum plant height (54.3) was attained by plants in control treatment (un-pinched) that was statistically similar to the height of zinnia plants pinched at 2 leaf stage (48.0 cm) (Table 1). Plants that were pinched at 6 leaf stage, attained the lowest (36.3 cm) height (Figure 1A). Regarding BAP application, zinnia plants showed a decrease in plant height when sprayed with BAP in increasing order. Zinnia plants reached to maximum height (49.6 cm) when they were left untreated (control). Statistically similar heights i.e. 48.0, 45.4 and 44.4 cm were also observed when the plants were treated with BAP at the rates of 25, 50 and 75 mg L-1 respectively. The lowest plant height (40.8 cm) was recorded in plants that were sprayed with 100 mg L-1 BAP (Figure 1B).

 

 

In plants, the apical bud produces auxins that are responsible for apical dominance. Removal of apical buds also stimulates cytokinins to trigger the lateral buds to start growth and ultimately it suppresses apical dominance that control plant height (Sunitha et al., 2007). Pathania et al. (2000) reported reduction in plant height with pinching in carnation plants. Munir and Naz (2006) also reported maximum plant height in snapdragon plants that were left un-pinched as compared with the plants that were pinched. BAP reduces plant height due to its control of auxins action of apical growth. The current findings are supported by Nermeen and Amira (2011), who observed minimum plant height with the application of BAP on plants. Carey et al. (2008) also concluded that BAP enhance the quality of Salvia nemorosa by stunting the plant height resulting in more compact plants.

Stem thickness (mm)

Table 1 indicated that stem thickness of zinnia plants increased with the progression in pinching stage. The plants pinched at 6 leaf stage attained maximum (7.7 mm) stem thickness. Zinnia plants pinched at 4 and 2 leaf stage produced stem thickness of 7.4 and 7.2 mm respectively. However, the lowest (7.0 mm) stem thickness was recorded in plants which were not pinched (Figure 2a). In case of BAP foliar application, stem thickness increased with the increase in BAP concentration as well. The thickest stems (7.8 mm) were observed when BAP was sprayed on the plants at the rate of 100 mg L-1, closely followed by the plants that received 75 and 50 mg L-1 BAP application attaining stem thickness of 7.6 and 7.4 mm respectively. Minimum stem thickness (6.8 mm) was recorded in control treatment (no BAP), but it was statistically at par with 7.0 mm thickness of the stem obtained, when 25 mg L-1 BAP were sprayed to the plants (Figure 2b).

 

 

Increase in thickness of stem due to pinching may be with the reason of cell division and enlargement, and lateral growth improvement in plant (Yadav et al., 2004). Contrarily, Whipker et al. (2000) suggested a 13.2% reduction in canopy diameter with pinching of plants. Agboola et al. (2004) and Fadimue et al. (2012) reported that plant hormone application increased stem diameter of Spondias mombin significantly. The current research is also in line with the results of Sardoei et al. (2014), who concluded that foliar application of BAP increase in stem diameter of Schefflera arboricola.

Number of branches plant-1

Number of branches plant-1 were improved significantly by both pinching stages and BAP concentrations (Table 1). The plants produced more number of branches as pinching was delayed up to 6 leaf stage. Maximum branches plant-1 (6.5) were produced by the plants pinched at 6 leaf stage, followed by the plants pinched at 4 and 2 leaf stages producing 5.4 and 5.0 branches respectively. However, minimum branches plant-1 (3.6) were produced by unpinched plants (Figure 2a). In case of BAP application, branches in plants increased with increase in BAP concentration. Maximum branches (6.0 plant-1) were produced by the plants that were sprayed with BAP at the rate of 100 mg L-1, closely followed by 75 and 50 mg L-1 BAP concentrations that produced 5.7 and 5.3 branches plant-1 respectively. Minimum branches plant-1 (4.0) were recorded in plants left untreated. However, it was also at par with 25 mg L-1 BAP application that resulted in 4.7 branches (Figure 2b).

Terminal buds producing natural auxin were removed which enhanced number of branches plant-1 in chrysanthemum flower. With removing the terminal buds reduces auxins concentration that hampers upward plant growth and the lateral buds starts to sprout as a result number of branches increases (Habiba et al., 2012). Eraki (1994) also found increased branches plant-1with foliar application of BAP on Hibiscus. Abd El-Aziz (2007) also reported that BAP showed positive effect on number of branches of croton plants. The effect of BAP could be attributed to its role in stimulating vascular strand development and xylem differentiation. It also increases water and nutrient uptake that increases plant biomass. This increment in branches is attributed to negative impact of BAP on apical dominance (Saadawy and Abdel-Moniem, 2015). The number of branches increase in petunia was observed by the foliar application of BAP (Carey et al., 2008).

 

Table 1: Means Square value of growth and quality production of zinnia plant as affected by pinching stages and BAP concentrations.

 

Number of leaves plant-1

Increased stage of pinching caused an increase in leaves number plant-1 (Table 1). Pinching of epical buds at the stage of 6 leaves produced more leaves (84.8) while the plants pinched at 4 and 2 leaf stages produced average of 77.2 and 70.9 leaves per plant respectively. Whereas, controlled (un-pinched) plants produced less number of leaves (53.3) plant-1 (Figure 3a). Higher concentration of BAP application caused production of more number of leaves in zinnia plants (Figure 2b). Number of leaves plant-1 in zinnia were maximum (86.4) in plants sprayed with 100 mg L-1 BAP closely followed by the plants treated with 75 and 50 mg L-1 BAP which produced 80.0 and 72.1 leaves in each treatment respectively. In case of controlled (un-treated) plants produced less number of leaves (54.8) plant-1.

Habiba et al. (2012) observed more leaves plant-1 after pinching Chrysanthemum indicum. Naresh and Singh (2012) reported that plants (African marigold) that were pinched produced maximum leaves plant-1. The current results are also in line with those of Sehrawat et al. (2003), who reported that pinching increased the number of leaves in several ornamental plants. Ona et al. (2015) also noticed more leaves plant-1 in pinched plants of snowball chrysanthemum. Saadawy and Abdel-Moniem (2015) observed more leaves plant-1in Euphorbia milii after foliar application of BAP at 100 mg L-1. The current findings similar to those reported Mutunga (1998), who reported that Matricaria chamomilla applied with high concentration of BAP had higher number of leaves plant-1 as compared to control. Findings of our current study are in line with the findings of Eid and Leila (2006) who studied highest number of leaves in cotton plants treated with BAP foliar application.

Days to flowering

Table 1 indicated that Zinnia flowering significantly delayed with progression in pinching stage. The un-pinched (control) plants produced the earliest flowers (in 30.3 days). This was closely followed by the plants pinched at 2 leaf stage taking 37.9 days to flowering. Pinching the plants at 4 leaf stage resulted in 42.0 days to flowering, while maximum days to flowering (48.3) were taken by plants pinched at 6 leaf stage (Figure 3a). Regarding BAP application, flowering delayed with the increase in BAP concentration as well. Minimum days (34.8) to flowering were taken by plants in control treatment. However, it was also at par with the plants that received 25 and 50 mg L-1 BAP application which took 38.4 and 39.4 days to flowering respectively. Maximum days (43.6) to flowering were found in plants sprayed with 100 mg L-1 BAP but the effect was similar to 75 mg L-1 BAP dose, which took 42.0 days to flowering (Figure 3b). The interactive effect of pinching and BAP regarding days o flowering was found non-significant.

Pinching in plants delays the flowering process, as the pinched plants produced flowers later than the control plants. This delay seems to push the plant back into juvenile stage. Plants pinched later will flower later and vice versa. Delay in flowering process of the plant is due to the vegetative growth initiation of auxiliary buds being the apical meristems removed. Findings of our study are in similarity to those of Wainwright and Irwin (1987) reported in winter (Coronette scarlet and yellow) and summer (Chime white) of snapdragon flowers. Another possible reason for late flowering in pinched plants could be signal transduction from leaves to apical meristems which have genes to change the meristems from vegetative to reproductive stage (Munir, 2003). Different plant growth regulators including BAP enhance vegetative growth (Keever and Morrison, 2003). Application of BAP at higher concentration was observed with excessive vegetative growth in young trees, i.e. Sophora (Carswell et al., 1996), roses (Chu and Lai, 1997) and poplar tree (Cline and Dong, 2002). Matsumoto (2006) recorded that foliar application of BAP from 25 to 50 mM enhanced vegetative shoots in Miltoniopsis orchids and delayed flowering. Richards and Wilkinson (1984) recorded that BAP at lower concentration was effective for early flowering as compared to higher concentration ranging from 10-150 mg l-1 in Boronia heterophylla. Foley and Keever (1991) reported that benzyladenine at 200 mg/l delayed flowering in Dianthus caryophyllus.

 

 

Number of flowers plant­-1

It is obvious from Table 1 that the number of flowers plant-1 significantly increased as the pinching was delayed up to 6 leaf stage. Maximum flowers plant-1 (12.2) were observed when zinnia plants were pinched at 6th leaf stage. The plants produced 11.5 and 11.1 flowers plant-1 when pinched at 4 and 2 leaf stages, respectively. Minimum flowers plant-1 (9.7) were recorded in plants of control treatment (Figure 4a). Regarding BAP application, increase in zinnia flowers plant-1 was observed with the increase in concentration of BAP. Maximum flowers plant-1 (12.0) were obtained at 100 mg L-1 BAP dose, which was closely followed by 75 mg L-1 and 50 mg L-1 BAP doses that produced 11.7 and 11.2 flowers plant-1 respectively. Minimum flowers plant-1 (10.1) were recorded in control treatment, which was at par with those sprayed with 25 mg L-1 BAP concentration producing 10.6 flowers plant-1 (Figure 4b).

 

 

Number of flowers is directly related to number of lateral branches. Pinching suppresses apical dominance and ultimately enhances number of lateral shoots that consequently increases the number of flowers (Ahmad et al., 2007). Cytokinins can affect number of flowers depending upon the concentration used (Pobudkiewicz, 2008). Hopkins and Huner (2009), reported that cytokinins are the derivatives of nitrogen based adenine that are noted for stimulating cell division in tissue culture. BAP is one of the aromatic cytokinins that stimulate cell division in lateral buds, which encourage flower buds to sprout. The current results are supported by the findings of Dalal et al. (2006), who reported that carnation plants pinched twice gave more flowers plant-1 as compared to un-pinched. Abd El-Aal and Mohamed (2017), reported that Geranium plants when treated with paclobutrazol gave maximum number of flower as compared to untreated. Foliar application of BAP significantly increase number of flowers in every cluster of Jatropha curcas as compared to control (Bang and Xu, 2011).

Flower diameter (cm)

Zinnia flower diameter significantly decreased with the increase in pinching stages (Table 1). The un-pinched plants produced the flowers with maximum (3.3 cm) diameter. This was closely followed by the zinnia plants pinched at 2 and 4 leaf stage having diameter of 3.0 and 2.7 cm respectively, while minimum flower diameter (1.8 cm) was recorded in plants pinched at 6 leaf stage (Figure 4a). The highest flower diameter in zinnia (3.5 cm) was observed in plants that were not sprayed with BAP (control), and it was closely followed by diameter of 3.0 cm in zinnia flower treated with 25 mg L-1 BAP. The flower diameter in plants sprayed with100 mg L-1 BAP was the lowest (2.0 cm), which was statistically similar with the flower diameter of plants treated with 75 mg L-1 and 50 mg L-1 (2.7 cm, 2.4 cm flower diameter respectively (Figure 4b).

Sharaf-Eldien et al. (2017) found a decrease in flower diameter of Zinnia elegans after pinching. The present study is in line with the findings of Srivastava et al. (2002), who noticed smaller flowers in marigold plants that were left un-pinched and smaller size flowers were also recorded in plants pinched at 20 days after transplanting of carnation (Dalal et al., 2006). In case of BAP, the current results are in contrast with the findings of Nishijima et al. (2006) who investigated that diameter of Petunia flowers were enhanced after the application of cytokinins. While, the results are in line with the findings of Saadawy and Abdel-Moniem (2015), who reported that BAP applied at high concentrations resulted in small flowers of Euphorbia milii. Pobudkiewicz (2005) also observed a decrease in flower size with BAP application on carnation ‘Snowmass’. Wu and Chang (2011) further investigated smaller flowers of Phalaenopsis orchid after the application of higher concentrations of BAP, which may be due to nutrient competition for subsequent flower development after improving the flower number.

Flower persistency (days)

Ant Table 1 shows a significant effect with the treatment of pinching stages and BAP concentration for flower persistency. Flowers persisted for maximum days (11.8) on the plants pinched at 6 leaf stage, closely followed by the plants pinched at 4 leaf stage with a flower persistence of 10.7 days. The flower persistence was minimum (9.3 days) in un-pinched plants, which was also at par with the plants pinched at 2 leaf stage having a flower persistency of 10.1 days (Figure 4a). The highest persistency of flowers (11.9 days) was recorded in plants treated with 100 mg L-1 BAP, which was statistically similar with the persistency recorded in plants treated with 75 and 50 mg L-1 BAP (11.4 and 10.6 days, respectively). The persistency of flowers in control plants was the lowest (8.6 days) and it was closely followed by the plants treated with 25 mg L-1 BAP (9.9 days) (Figure 4b).

The current findings show that flower persistency enhanced as the plants were pinched at maximum leaf stage (6 leaf stage). These findings are in line with the results of Singh et al. (1980), who found increase in the persistency of flowers with pinching and reported that pinching helped to improve the luster and keeping quality of flowers. Cytokinins are considered to decrease sensitivity of flowers to ethylene, which ultimately increases the longevity of individual flower on the plant. Chang et al. (2003) reported that when pollinated flowers of petunia were treated with cytokinins. They were more persistent because of slow senescence process Gulzar et al. (2005) also reported that cytokinins increase flower persistency in daylilies. The current findings are also in line with the results of Wu and Chang (2011), who observed that increase in concentration of BAP as foliar application increased flower persistency in Phalaenopsis.

Flower fresh weight (g)

The fresh weight of the zinnia flowers reduced with the progression in pinching stage (Table 1). The plants which were left un-pinched produced the highest fresh flower weight (6.6 g). This was closely followed by the plants pinched at 2 leaf stage and 4 leaf stage resulted in 6.2 and 5.9 g fresh weight respectively. While lowest fresh weight (5.1 g) of zinnia flowers was observed in the plants pinched at 6 leaf stage (Figure 5a). Concerning BAP application, flower fresh weight was reduced with the increase in BAP concentration as well. Maximum fresh flower weight (6.7 g) was recorded for plants grown in control treatment. However, it was also statistically similar with the plants that received 25 mg L-1 BAP application, which resulted in 6.2 g of fresh flower weight. Plants treated with BAP at the rate of 50 and 75 mg L-1 behaved alike and produced the flowers with fresh weights of 5.9 and 5.6 g respectively. Whereas, the lowest flower fresh weight (5.2 g) of zinnia flower was recorded in plants that were treated with 100 mg L-1 BAP dose (Figure 5b).

 

 

The current results are in line with Dorajeerao and Mokashi (2012), who worked on pinching in chrysanthemum and observed that pinching enhanced number of flowers plant-1, but reduced flower fresh weight and size. The present findings are also in line with the results of Nazir and Amin (1990), who worked on carnation pinching. In case of BAP, the results reveal that fresh weight of flowers decreased with the application of BAP and was found the lowest at the highest level of BAP. The present findings are also in line with the results of Gibson and Whiper (2003) and Hojjati et al. (2009), who observed that application of BAP to plant, decreased its growth. They observed more branches plant-1 having more flowers of smaller sizes and lesser fresh weights.

Flower dry weight (g)

Table 1 shows a significant effect of flower dry weight with the application of pinching stages and BAP concentration. The dry weight of zinnia flowers declined with severity in pinching. The control treatment resulted in maximum dry weight (2.6 g) of zinnia flower. Plants pinched at 2 and 4 leaf stages behaved alike and producing 2.2 and 2.0 g flower dry weight respectively (Figure 5a). The flower dry weight was mini mum at 6 leaf stage having weight of 1.2 g. Regarding BAP application, maximum flower dry weight (2.5 g) was obtained in un-pinched zinnia plants, closely followed by 25 mg L-1 BAP application with 2.3 g flower dry weight. BAP sprayed at 50 and 75 mg L-1 concentrations produced flowers with 2.1 and 1.9 g dry weight respectively. The application of BAP at 100 mg L-1 concentration resulted in minimum (1.3 g) flower dry weight (Figure 5b).

Pinching increases the number of flowers plant-1 but reduces flower size and hence its dry weight. The dry weight of the flowers decreased with pinching stages and was the lowest at 6 leaf stage of pinching. The present finding is in accordance with Naresh and Singh (2012), who worked on pinching in African marigold and found a decrease in dry weight of flowers with pinching. The current results are in line with those of Bhatti and Chikara (1987), who found minimum dry weight of flowers in pinched plants as compared to un-pinched. In case of BAP, dry weight of flowers decreased with the application of BAP. The present findings are in accordance with the results of Gibson and Whiper (2003) and Hojjati et al. (2009), who observed that application of BAP decreased plant growth. They found more branches plant-1 with more but smaller flowers with lower dry weights.

 

Conclusions and Recommendations

Zinnia pinched at 6 leaf stage performed better in term of reducing plant height and increasing number of branches and flowers. Foliar spray of BAP at 100 mg L-1 resulted in reduction in plant height compared to control and enhanced lateral branching and flower yield. Pinching zinnia at 6 leaf stage is recommended to control plant height and increase flower production. A foliar dose of 100 mg L-1 BAP should be applied to reduce plant height and enhance flower production in zinnia.

 

Novelty Statement

The comparative effect of both BAP and pinching was evaluated for quality flower production and growth of zinnia flower in the agro-climatic zone of Peshawar. Pinched flowers of zinnia at six (6) leaves stage with the application of BAP (@100mg.L-1) recorded an abrupt change in the height of plants and flowers production.

 

Author’s Contribution

S. Ali and A.M. Khattak: Conceived and designed the study.

S. Ali and A. Basit: Performed the experiment.

A. Basit, S.T. Shah and I. Ullah: Analyzed the data.

I. Ahmad, N.A. Khan, K. Rauf, S. Khan, I. Ullah and I. Ahmad: Contributed the chemical/ materials/analysis tools.

A. Basit: Wrote and reviewed the paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

 

References

Abd El-Aal, M.M.M. and Y.F.Y. Mohamed. 2017. Effect of Pinching and Paclobutrazol on Growth, Flowering, Anatomy and Chemical Compositions of Potted Geranium (Pelargonium zonal L.) Plant. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 17(6): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2017/34527

Abd El-Aziz, N.G., 2007. Stimulatory effect of NPK fertilizer and benzyladenine on growth and chemical constituents of Codiaeum variegatum L. Plant. Ameri-Eura J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 2(6): 711-719.

Agboola, D.A., W.F. Idowu and M. Kadiri. 2004. Seed germination and seedling growth of Ti/hon/a diversfolia (Heml) A. Gray, the Mexican sunflower. Int. J. Tropic. Environ., 25(4): 62-72.

Ahmad, I., K. Ziaf, M. Qasim and M. Tariq. 2007. Comparative evaluation of different pinching approaches on vegetative and reproductive growth of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus). Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 44(4): 563-570.

Ahmad, M., M.R. Khattak, S.A. Jadoon, A. Rab, A. Basit, I. Ullah, M.A. Khalid, I. Ullah and M. Shair. 2019. Influence of zinc sulphate on flowering and seed production of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): A medicinal flowering plant. Int. J. Biosci., 14:464-476.

Alam, M., K. Hayat, I. Ullah, M. Sajid, M. Ahmad, A. Basit, I. Ahmad, A. Muhammad, S. Akbar and Z. Hussain. 2020. Improving okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) growth and yield by mitigating drought through exogenous application of salicylic acid. Fres. Environ. Bull., 29: 529–535.

Bang, Z.P. and Z.F. Xu. 2011. Benzyladenine treatment significantly increases the seed yield of the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas. J. Plant Growth Regul., 30: 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-010-9179-3

Bashir, E. and R. Bantel. 1994. Horticulture. Printed book. Edited by Bashir and Bantel. pp. 333-549.

Basit, A., Hassnain, M. Alam, I. Ullah, S.T. Shah, S.A. Zuhair and I. Ullah. 2020. Quality indices of tomato plant as affected by water stress conditions and chitosan application. Pure Appl. Biol., 9(2): 1364–1375. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2020.90143

Basit, A., I. Ullah, S.T. Shah, I. Ullah, N. Alam and S.A.Q. Gilani. 2019b. Effect of Media Amendments on Invivo Root and Shoot Organogenesis of Stevia (Stevia Rebaudiana). Int. J. Biosci., 14(4): 55-63. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/14.4.55-63

Basit, A., K. Shah, M.U. Rahman, L. Xing, X. Zuo, M. Han, N. Alam, F. Khan, I. Ahmed and M.A. Khalid. 2018. Salicylic acid an emerging growth and flower inducing hormone in marigold (Tagetes sp. L.). Pure Appl. Biol., (PAB). 7(4): 1301-1308. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2018.700151

Basit, A., S. Khan, Sulaiman, S. Shah and A.A. Shah. 2019a. Morphological features of various selected tree species on the greater university campus Peshawar, Pakistan. Int. J. Bot. Stud., 4: 92–97. http://www.botanyjournals.com/archives/2019/vol4/issue5/4-5-48

Bhatti, R.S. and S.D. Chitakra. 1987. Effect of pinching and planting distance on the growth and yield of marigold (Tagetes erecta). Res. Dev. Rep., 4(2): 159-164.

Carey, D.J., B.E. Whipker, I. McCall, and W. Buhler. 2008. Benzyladenine Affects Growth of Petunia. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of science. pp. 131-135.

Carpenter, W.J. and R.C. Rodriguez. 1971. The effect of plant growth regulating chemicals on rose shoot development from basal and axillary buds. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 96: 389-391.

Carswell, F.E., J.S. Day, K.S. Gould and P.E. Jameson. 1996. Cytokinins and the regulation of plant form in three species of Sophora. New Zealand J. Bot., 34(1): 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1996.10412699

Chang, H.C., M.L. Jones, G.M. Banowetz, and D.G. Clark. 2003. Overproduction of cytokinins in petunia flowers transformed with PSAG12-IPT delays corolla senescence and decreases sensitivity to ethylene. Plant Physiol., 132: 2174-2183. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.023945

Chu, C.Y. and C.C. Lai. 1997. The effect of node position, benzyladenine and gibberellic acid on the development of lateral shoot on single-node cutting. J. Agric. For. Taichung, 46(1): 19-29.

Cline, M.G. and K. Dong. 2002. A preliminary investigation of the role of auxin and cytokinin in sylleptic branching of three hybrid poplar clones exhibiting contrasting degrees of sylleptic branching. Ann. Bot., 90: 417-421. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf195

Dalal, S.R., D.R. Nandre, S.G. Bharad, S. Utgikar and R.D. Shinde. 2006. Effect of pinching on carnation cv. Yellow Solar under polyhouse condition. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2(2): 356-357.

Dole, H.C., 1999. Zinnias: Colorful, Butterfly-approved. Butterfly gardeners Quarterly. BGQ. 30931, seattle, WA. 98103.

Dorajeerao, A.V.D. and A.N. Mokashi. 2012. Growth analysis as influenced by pinching time in garland chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum coronarium L.). Glob. J. Biol. Sci. Biotechnol., 1: 242-247.

Eid, R.A. and B.H. Abou-Leila. 2006. Response of croton plants to gibberellic acid, benzyl adenine and ascorbic acid application. World J. Agric. Sci., 2: 174-179.

Eraki, M.A., 1994. The effect of gibberellic application and chelated iron nutrition on the growth and flowering of Queen Elizabeth rose plants. First Conf. Ornamental Hortic., 2: 436-444.

Fadimu, O.Y., A.A. Ajiboye, D.A. Agboola, M. Kadiri and M.O. Adedire. 2012. Effect of some combination of phytohormones on some growth parameters and vitamin C, carbohydrate, protein and chlorophyll contents of spondias Mombin (Linn) seedlings. Ife J. Sci., 14(2): 397-403.

Foley, J.T. and G.J. Keever. 1991. Growth regulators and pruning alter growth and axillary shoot development of Dianthus. J. Environ. Hort., 9(4): 191-195. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-9.4.191

Gibson, J.L. and B.E. Whipker. 2003. Efficacy of plant growth regulators on growth on vigorous Osteospermum cultivars. Hortic. Tech., 13: 132-135. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.13.1.0132

Gilani, S.A.Q., K. Shah, I. Ahmed, A. Basit, M. Sajid, A.S. Bano, G. Ara and U. Shahid. 2018. Influence of indole butyric acid (IBA) concentrations on air layerage in guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Sufeda. Pure Appl. Biol., 8(1): 355-362. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2018.700194

Gocal, F.W.G., P.R. Pharis, C.E. Yeung and D. Pearce. 1991. Changes after decapitation in concentrations of indole 3 acetic acid and abscisic acid in the larger axillary bud of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Tender Green. Plant Physiol., 95: 344-350. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.95.2.344

Gulzar, S., I. Tahir, I. Amin, S. Farogg, and S.M. Sultan. 2005. Effect of cytokinins on flowers of day lily (Hemerocallis fulva) cv and there senescence and longevity. Royal Crown sprayed with cycloheximide. Acta Hortic. 669: 395-403. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.669.52

Habiba, S.U., M.S. Islam and A.J. Uddin. 2012. Influence of terminal bud pinching on growth and yield of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum indicum L.) J. Bangladesh Acad. Sci., 36(2): 251-255. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v36i2.12971

Hojjati, M., N. Etemadi and B. Baninasab. 2009. Effect of paclobutrazol and cycocel on vegetative growth and flowering of zinnia (Zinnia elegans).

Hopkins, W.G. and N.P.A. Huner. 2009. Introduction to Plant Physiology, 4th ed. John Wiley Sons. 68(76): 330-331.

Jan, M.T., P. Shah, P.A. Hollington, M.J. Khan and Q. Shohail. 2009. Agriculture research: Design and analysis. 1st Ed. Dept. Agron., Univ. Agric., Peshawar, Pakistan.

Javid, Q.A., N.A. Abbasi, I.A. Hafiz and A.L. Mughal. 2005. Performance of Zinnia (Zinnia elegans) “Dahlia Flowered” Crimson Shade by application of NPK Fertilizer. Int. J. Agric. Bio., 3: 474-476.

Kamkari, B., A. Asgharzadeh and M. Azimzadeh. 2016. Effects of salt stress and salicylic acid on vegetative and reproductive traits of pot marigold. IIOAB J., 7: 34-41.

Keever, G.J. and T.A. Morrison. 2003. Multiple benzyladenine applications increase shoot formation in nandina. J. Environ. Hortic., 21(3): 144-147. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-21.3.144

Krug, B.A., 2004. The chemical growth regulation of bulb crops using flurprimidol as foliar sprays, substrate drenches and pre-plant bulb soaks. MSc. thesis, North Caroline State Univ, Raleigh, USA.

Latimer, J., 1991. Growth stunter affect landscape performance of zinnia, impatiens and marigold. Hortic. Sci., 26: 557-560. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.26.5.557

Mader, J.C., G.N. Colin and R.J. Neil Emery. 2003a. Transport and metabolism of xylem cytokinins during lateral bud release in decapitated chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seedlings. Physiol. Plant., 117: 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.1170115.x

Mader, J.C., R.J.N. Emery and C.G.N. Turnbull. 2003b. Spatial and temporal changes in multiple hormone groups during lateral bud release shortly following apex decapitation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seedlings. Physiol. Plant., 119: 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00179.x

Matsumoto, T.K., 2006. Gibberellic acid and Benzyladenine and gibberellic acid enhance vegetative growth and early flowering of Miltoniopsis orchid hybrids. Hortic. Sci., 41(1): 131-135. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.1.131

Munir, M., 2003. A study on the effects of environmental factors affecting the phases of flower development in Antirrhinum majus L. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Horticulture and Landscape, School of Plant Sciences, The University of Reading, UK.

Munir, M. and F. Naz. 2006. Growth and flowering response of snapdragon after release apical dominance. J. App. Hortic. 8: 25-28. https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2006.v08i01.06

Mutunga, C.M.M., 1998. MS thesis. Effect of benzyladenine, gibberellic acid, and ethephon on growth and flower yield of chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) Plants. Department of crop science. College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences. University of Nairobi.

Naresh and Singh. 2012. Effect of pinching and growth retardants on flowering and yield of Afirican marigold (Tagetes erecta) var. Pusa Narangi Gainda. Int. J. Hortic. 2(1): 1-5.

Nazir, M. and N.U. Amin. 1990. Cut flowers production: The complete guide. NWFP Agric. Univ. Press production, 1991, pp. 1-37.

Nermeen, S.T.A. and S.S. Amira. 2011. Response of snapdragon plants to pinching and growth retardants treatments. Am. Eurasian J. Sustain. Agric., 5(2): 150-157.

Nishijima, T., M. Hideari, K. Sasaki and T. Okazawa. 2006. Effect of cytokinin on petunia (Petunia hybrida Vilm.) Cultivar and anatomical analysis of corolla enlargement. Sci. Hortic., 111: 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.08.007

Ona, A.F., T. Taufique, M.Z. Roni, K. Jui and A.F.M.J. Uddin. 2015. Effect of pinching on growth and production of Snowball Chrysanthemum. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. Res., 3: 174-78.

Pathania, N.S., O.P. Sehgal and Y.C. Gupta. 2000. Pinching for flower regulation in Sim Carnation. J. Orna. Hortic. 3: 114-117.

Pobudkiewicz, A., 2005. The influence of benzyladenine on tillering of pot carnation. Zeszyty Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 509: 209-214.

Pobudkiewicz, A., 2008. The influence of growth retardants and cytokinins on flowering of ornamental plants. Acta Agrobot., 61(1): 137-141. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2008.018

Reilly, A., 1978. Parks success with seeds. Park seed Co. Inc. Green Wood, south Caroline. pp. 269-271.

Richards, D. and R.I. Wilkinson. 1984. Effect of manual pinching on potting-on and cytokinins on branching and flowers of Camellia Rhododendron. Sci. J. Hortic., 23(1): 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(84)90047-5

Saadawy, F. and A.M. Abdel-Moniem. 2015. Effect of some factors on growth and development of euphorbia milii var. longifolia. Middle East J., 4(4): 613-628.

Sajid, M., A. Basit, Z. Ullah, S.T. Shah, I. Ullah, H.I. Mohamed and I. Ullah. 2020. Chitosan-based foliar application regulate the production and biochemical aspect of peach (Prunus persica L.) cv. Early Grand. Bull. Nat. Res. Centre. 44: 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00405-w

Sardoei, A.S., A. Roein, F. Shahadadi, T. Sadeghi and T.S. Mokhtari. 2014. Effect of endogenus gibberellic acid and benzyladenine on stem elongation and leaf in Schefflera arboricola L. plants. Int. J. Plant Anim. Environ. Sci., 4(3): 431-437. www.ijpaes.com

Sehrawat, S.K., D.S. Dahiya, S. Singh and G.S. Rana. 2003. Effect of nitrogen and pinching on the growth, flowering, and yield of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. African Giant Double Orange. Haryana J. Hortic. Sci., 32(1-2): 59-61.

Sharaf-Eldien, M.N., S.Z. El-Bably and M.R. Magouz. 2017. Effect paclobutrazol and pinching on vegetative growth, flowering and chemical composition of zinnia elegans, Jacq. J. Pl. Prod. Mansoura Univ. 8(5): 587-592. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2017.40474

Singh, Jaswinder and J.S. Arora. 1980. Effect of spacing and pinching on growth and flower production of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) c.v African giant double orange Proc. Nat. Sem. Prod. Tech. Comm. Flower crops, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University. Coimbatore. 85-89.

Srivastava, S.K., H.K. Singh, and A.K. Srivastava. 2002. Effect of spacing and pinching on growth and flowering of ‘Pusa Narangi Gainda’ marigold (Tagetes erecta). Indian J. Agriic. Sci., 72(10): 611-615.

Sunitha, H.M., H. Ravi, B.S. Vyakaranahal and H.B. Bablad. 2007. Effect of pinching and growth regulators on plant growth, flowering and seed yield in African marigold (Tagetes Erecta L.). 10(2): 91-95.

Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 2010. Plant physiology. Sinauer Assoc. Inc. 5th edition. 505.

Wainwright, H. and H.L. Irwin. 1987. The effects of paclobutrazol and pinching on Antirrhinum flowering pot plants. J. Hort. Sci., 62: 401-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1987.11515798

Whipker, B.E., I. McCall and J.L. Gibson. 2000. Bonzi has advantages over Sumagic as a growth regulator for ornamental pepper. North Carolina State Univ. Floriculture Res. Rep. 146:1-4.

Wu, P.H. and D.C.N. Chang. 2011. Cytokinin treatment and flower quality in Phalaenopsis orchids: Comparing N-6-benzyladenine, kinetin and 2 isopentenyl adenine. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11(7): 1592-1596. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2472

Yadav, R.S., C.T. Hash, F.R. Bidinger, K.M. Devos and C.J. Howarth. 2004. Genomic regions associated with grain yield and aspects of post flowering drought tolerance in pearl millet across environments and tester background. Euphytica, 136: 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000032711.34599.3a

Yassin, M. and A.E. Ismail. 1994. Effect of zinnia elegans as a mix-crop along with tomato against meloidogyne incognita and rotylenchulus reniformis. Anzeiger fur schadings kunde pflanzen schutzum welte schutz. 96(2): 221-225.