Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Impact of Propolis Nanoemulsion on Listeria monocytogenes Contaminating Chilled Stored Breaded Chicken Panne

Impact of Propolis Nanoemulsion on Listeria monocytogenes Contaminating Chilled Stored Breaded Chicken Panne

Aalaa S. Saad1*, Taghreed H. A. Ali2, Nayerah Alatfeehy3, Dalia Elmasry4 

1Biotechnology Department, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt; 2Reference Lab for Examination of Food of Animal Origin, Food Hygiene Department, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt; 3Department of Bacteriology, Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production (RLQP), Animal Research Institute (AHRI), Agriculture Research Center (ARC); 4Nanomaterials research and Synthesis unit, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

*Correspondence | Aalaa S. Saad, Biotechnology Department, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt; Email: [email protected]  

Figure 1

(a) The droplet size was determined to be 19.78 nm by the use of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). )b): Cell viability % of 30% PNs effect on Vero cells. (C): FTIR of 30% propolis nanoparticles. 

Figure 2
L. monocytogenes viable count (log CFU/g) of breaded chicken panni treated with PE and PNs and the control (untreated) at chilling preservation. Values are expressed as the mean ±SD. There are significant differences between points that have different letters on the same day of preservation. 
Figure 3

(A). Relative hlyA gene expression of L. monocytogenes in breaded chicken panni treated with PE and PNs groups and control group at chilling preservation. Values are expressed as the mean ±SD. There are significant differences between points that have different letters on the same day of preservation. (B). Relative iap gene expression of L. monocytogenes in breaded chicken panni treated with PE and PNs groups and control group at chilling preservation. Values are expressed as the mean ±SD. There are significant differences between points that have different letters on the same day of preservation. 

Figure 4

The average score of taste, color, flavor, and overall acceptability of breaded chicken panni treated with PE and PNs groups and control group at chilling preservation. Values are expressed as the mean ±SD. 

Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences

November

Vol. 12, Iss. 11, pp. 2062-2300

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe