Enhancing of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch, 1794) Fry Nursery Rearing Through Biofloc Technology (BFT): A Sustainable Approach for Bangladesh’s Aquaculture Sector
Enhancing of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch, 1794) Fry Nursery Rearing Through Biofloc Technology (BFT): A Sustainable Approach for Bangladesh’s Aquaculture Sector
Shaila Akter1, MD Zobayer Rahman2*, Farzana Islam1, Zamal Hussan1, Rasel Mia3, Kazi Rabeya Akther1, Nirmal Chandra Roy1
1Department of Fish Biology and Genetics, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.
2Department of Fish Health Management, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.
3Department of Aquatic Resource Management, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.
Abstract | Biofloc has recently gained popularity due to its profitable components, mostly focused on developing microorganisms that swiftly convert floc chemicals into feed for H. fossilis. The investigation focused on the nursery rearing of H. fossilis fry in non-biofloc (T1) and biofloc (T2, T3 and T4) reared systems for 60 days to examine growth without exchanging water. At the same time, water quality metrics were carefully monitored and maintained. The stocking density in all tanks was 800 fry of H. fossilis initial weight of (0.51±0.02 g)/1000 liters of water in an outdoor fish hatchery. During the trial, additional commercial floating powdered feed was administered. Finally, species obtained an average weight of 2.82±0.14 g, a final length of 9.0±0.40 cm, a mean final weight gain of 2.82±0.14 g, and a relative growth rate of 589.67±55.70%, lower FCR of 0.78±0.03 value with maximum growth. These changes took place during the T2 trial, keeping the feed ratio at 75% feed and 25% floc. The survival rate, on the other hand, remained constant throughout all treatments. Only two parameters (specific growth rate and protein efficiency ratio) were discovered to have maximum output within the control. Throughout the trial, several water parameters were discovered to be optimal in each tank. During the experiment, BFT kept in T2 (75% feed + 25% floc) trail optimized the most desirable traits of growth for H. fossilis fish fry.
Novelty Statement | This study introduces a novel approach for nursery rearing of H. fossilis fry in outdoor hatcheries, showing that a 75% feed and 25% floc mixture (T2) significantly enhances growth metrics-such as weight gain, length, and feed conversion ratio-without water exchange. The findings demonstrate BFT’s potential to improve feed efficiency, maintain water quality, and sustain high survival rates, offering a resource-efficient strategy to advance sustainable aquaculture practices.
Article History
Received: November 14, 2022
Revised: October 28, 2024
Accepted: November 06, 2024
Published: December 03, 2024
Authors’ Contributions
SA, FA, ZH: Investigation, methodology. SA, MZR, RM: Data curation. SA, MZR: Writing-original draft preparation. RM, MZR: Formal analysis. RM: Methodology. KRA, NCR: Supervision, fund management. NCR: Conceptualization, project administration, validation, review.
Keywords
Heteropneustes fossilis, Water quality, Biofloc Technology (BFT), Growth parameters, Nursery, Bangladesh
Copyright 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Corresponding Author: MD Zobayer Rahman
To cite this article: Akter, S., Rahman, M.D.Z., Islam, F., Hussan, Z., Mia, R., Akther, K.R. and Roy, N.C., 2024. Enhancing of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch, 1794) fry nursery rearing through biofloc technology (BFT): A sustainable approach for Bangladesh’s aquaculture sector. Punjab Univ. J. Zool., 39(2): 231-238. https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pujz/2024/39.2.231.238
Introduction
Aquaculture sector is a global option to battle hunger, alleviate poverty, and strengthen countries economic situations (FAO, 2023; Hambrey, 2017). With the world’s population expected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050, it is critical to continue aquaculture methods (El-Sayed, 2021). Aquaculture, which currently employs 12% of the global population, is critical in meeting food demands (DoF, 2019). However, with shrinking landmass and waterbodies, extensive aquaculture operations are required to increase economically valuable species (Mugwanya et al., 2021). Bangladesh, which is rated third in the world for fish production, has a favorable aquaculture terrain with plentiful water bodies, rivers, and diversified fisheries biodiversity (FAO, 2022). Small fish, also known as Small Indigenous Species (SIS), are popular in Asian countries due to its great taste, high protein content, and omega fatty acids, which contribute to better health (Puvaneswari et al., 2009). Biofloc Technology (BFT) develops as an economically viable and environmentally sustainable alternative to fulfill rising food demand (Naylor et al., 2000; Avnimelech and Kochba, 2009). BFT entails feeding aquatic organisms in a restricted environment, increasing nutrient recycling, and minimizing water exchange, hence promoting the growth of beneficial heterotrophic bacteria (Azim and Little, 2008; Avnimelech, 2007). This method, known for its high potential output and environmentally favorable structure, has been utilized for a variety of valuable species, including Tilapia, shrimp, and sturgeon (Serfling, 2006; Avnimelech, 2007; Taw, 2010). Heteropneustes fossilis, a rare Small Indigenous Species, is threatened by exploitation and environmental changes (Monir and Rahman, 2015; IUCN Bangladesh, 2000). This species has a high commercial value due to its air-breathing organ and nutrient-rich makeup. Recognizing the relevance of the critical larval rearing period in lowering production costs, boosting disease resistance, and improving fish survival quality, this study focuses on the H. Fossilis fry in a brief period of time. The use of BFT in nursery setups, which has been demonstrated to aid in the rapid development of shrimp species, is being studied to determine its impact on growth. The purpose of this project is to increase fish output in Bangladesh with BFT, which is in line with sustainable development goals. Despite the economic importance of H. fossilis fry, no previous research has explored the potential growth and stocking densities in Bangladesh using BFT. This study aims to fill that void by investigating the usage of BFT in H. fossilis. The impacts of H. fossilis nursery conditions on water quality markers are being investigated. The results are likely to aid Producers of H. fossilis fry are keen in promoting sustainable aquaculture practices in Bangladesh using BFT.
Materials and Methods
Experimental design
The entire experiment (four treatments with three replications) was given twelve concrete cells (5x4x3) ft3 that were placed outside at the micro hatchery of the Department of Fish Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Fisheries, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet. The experiment lasted 60 days (August to October, 2021). Each tank was cleaned, dried, and replenished with 1000 liters of clean water to a depth of 0.5 meters prior to the investigation. A comprehensive power supply was used to provide the perfect oxygenation system. To aerate the water, two massive air compressors were used.
Floc preparation
The floc was made with Everfresh-Pro Biofloc Exclusive (Blue Weight Biotech LLP, India), which contained 15 billion CFU/g of (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus pumilis). An FCO (Fermented Carbon Organic) unit was established in a 200L plastic drum containing 10L water, 100g salt, 40g probiotics, and 400g molasses to induce floc production. After adding manufactured probiotics (Aqua Life-S and Everfresh-Pro Biofloc Exclusive), the floc appeared after 3-7 days. An Imhoff cone was used to determine floc density. Heterotrophic bacteria also absorb additional nutrients, which helps to improve the aquatic environment by lowering nitrogen levels and breaking down biological waste.
Experimental fish and diet supply
The experimental fish, H. fossilis fry, was cultivated for 60 days. 10,000 fries were taken from the renowned private fish hatchery of Sreemangal, Moulavibazar district and carried to the fish hatchery in an oxygenated plastic tank for 3 days of acclimation. Fish were fed 10% body weight commercial floating powder feed (crude protein 40%) twice a day (Table 1). The volume of feeding also depends on the feeding response; for example, feeding was halted when fish showed no reaction to feed. Unused feed was collected with a collecting net. Throughout the experiment, there was no water exchange. The control and BFT treatments were prepared (Table 2). The amount of molasses added each day is calculated in accordance to the study of Avnimelech (2011).
S. No. |
Proximate composition |
Percentage (%) |
1 |
Crude protein |
40.0 |
2 |
Lipid |
5.0 |
3 |
Carbohydrates |
38.0 |
4 |
Ash |
5.0 |
5 |
Vitamin-Mineral premix |
2.0 |
6 |
Moisture |
10.0 |
Table 2: Setting up the experiment.
Group |
Treatment |
Replication |
Feeding |
Stocking density/tank |
Control |
Control group (T1) |
3 |
100% feeding rate |
800 |
BFT |
(T2) BFT 75% |
3 |
800 |
|
(T3) BFT 50% |
3 |
BFT + 50% feeding rate |
800 |
|
(T4) BFT 25% |
3 |
BFT + 25% feeding rate |
800 |
Table 3: Growth parameters calculated using the following formulas.
Parameters |
Calculation |
Weight Gain (gm) |
Final Weight (gm) – Initial Weight (gm) |
Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) |
Total Feed Given (gm)/ Weight Gain (gm) |
Specific Growth Rate (SGR) (% per day) |
[{ln (Final Weight) – ln (Initial Weight) /days} × 100] |
Relative Growth Rate (RGR) (%) |
{(Final Weight – Initial Weight)/ Initial Weight} × 100 |
Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) |
Wet Weight Gain (gm)/ Protein Consumed (gm) |
Survival Rate (%) |
(Final Number of Fish)/ (Initial Number of Fish) × 100 |
Table 4: Water quality parameters (Mean ± SE) during the experimental period (60 days).
Parameters |
T1 (Control) |
T2 (BFT 75%) |
T3 (BFT 50%) |
T4 (BFT 25%) |
Temperature (oC) |
27.96±0.10 |
27.92±0.09 |
27.93±0.09 |
27.95±0.09 |
pH |
7.34±0.03b |
7.21±0.02a |
7.22±0.03a |
7.22±0.02a |
TDS (ppm) |
68.82±0.70a |
162.15±8.27b |
161.93±8.17b |
160.92±8.08b |
DO (ppm) |
6.23±0.06b |
5.44±0.10a |
5.31±0.10a |
5.39±0.09a |
NH3 (ppm) |
0.026±0.003 |
0.025±0.003 |
0.030±0.003 |
0.026±0.003 |
Salinity (ppt) |
0.00±.000a |
0.23±0.02b |
0.23±0.02b |
0.24±0.02b |
TAN |
1.36±0.14 |
1.52±0.16 |
1.72±0.15 |
1.53±0.14 |
Floc volume (ppm) |
0.00±0.00 |
10.57±0.46 |
12.25±0.57 |
15.79±0.80 |
Superscripts in an individual row indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05.
Water quality monitoring
Throughout the trial, water quality data were recorded on a regular basis before feed supply, between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. According to the American Public Health Association (APHA, 2012), the YSI multimeter water quality parameter was employed.
Growth performances parameters
Fish were collected for sampling of various growth indicators, which was followed by (Sarker et al., 2016). By the end of the experiment, the total number of fish and all growth parameters had been counted and calculated to determine the growth parameters.
Statistical analysis
All experimental data were analyzed using the Microsoft Excel Analysis tools, IBM SPSS, and the Linear regression approach, and the coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated to figure out how well the regression model suited the observed data.
Results and Discussion
Water quality
All the water quality parameters were recorded within a favorable range in both the control and treatment trials (Table 4).
The temperature across all treatments, including the control, remained consistent, ranging from 27.92 °C to 27.96 °C. The pH was slightly lower in BFT treatments (T2-T4) than the control, ranging between 7.21 and 7.34. TDS was significantly higher in BFT treatments (160.92-162.15 ppm) compared to the control (68.82 ppm). DO was highest in the control (6.23 ppm) and lowest in T3 (5.31 ppm). Ammonia levels were low across treatments (0.025-0.030 ppm), and salinity was near zero, with minimal differences. TAN was lowest in the control (1.36 ppm) and slightly higher in T3 (1.72 ppm). Floc volume was zero in the control and highest in T4 (15.79 ppm).
The BFT treatments had considerably higher TDS values than the control, reflecting the increased biofloc material in the water. Dissolved oxygen was higher in control, with the BFT treatments exhibiting reduced levels, possibly due to increased organic activity in the biofloc systems. The control had no floc volume, while the BFT treatments showed a clear increase in floc volume, with T4 having the highest volume. The control had lower TAN, while the BFT treatments had higher values, indicating that biofloc impacts the nitrogen levels in the water.
Finally, it can be state that, temperatures were consistent across all treatments, showing no effect from biofloc system. Ammonia (NH3) levels remained steady, and salinity showed minimal variation among the BFT treatments.
Growth parameters
Biofloc had an impact on the growth of the nursery culture of the stinging catfish (Table 5). The final length was recorded highest in T2 (BFT 75%) at 9.35±0.40 cm and lowest growth was observed in T4 (BFT 25%) at 9.03±0. 46cm during the experiment (Figure 1A). The protein efficiency ratio was highest 2.98±0.12 in control T1 and the lowest efficiency rate in T2 was 2.05±0.17 (Figure 1B). The relative growth rate was higher in T2 (BFT 75%) 589.67±55.70 than all treatment trials (Figure 1C). The specific growth rate was observed higher in T1 (control) and lower in T4 (Figure 1D). The mean final weight gain was highest in T2 (BFT 75%) 2.82±0.14g and lowest in T4 (BFT 25%) 2.32±0.06g (Figure 1F). Prior to the experimental fish had the same size in the initial period but after 35 days of the research, the average weight was highest in T2 (BFT 75%) 3.25±0.15g and lowest in T4 (BFT 75%) (2.32±0.12g) (Figure 1F-G). The best feed conversion ratio (FCR) with the lowest value (0.78±0.03) was found in T2 (Figure 1H).
The second-degree polynomial regression (Cohen, 1988) line shows the quadratic expression of the curve. To know the relation of the growth factor of biofloc with the regression line. Biofloc and growth factor had interlinkage which express through three varieties of second-degree polynomial regression including strong relation (0.8-0.9), moderate relation (0.5-0.6) and no relation (<0.5).
In this experiment, second-degree polynomial regression analysis had a strong positive relationship with between the specific growth rate, R2 = 0.9084 (Figure 2C); and feed conversion ratio, R2 = 0.9055 (Figure 2B). On the other hand, moderate relation was noticed amongrelative growth rate, R2 = 0.6399 (Figure 2E); protein efficiency ratio, R2 = 0.5143 (Figure 2D). Also, no relation was noticed at weight gain, R2 = 0.6657 (Figure 2A). The regression analysis demonstrated that the growth and survival of stinging catfish were influenced by biofloc treatment.
Biofloc technology (BFT) is a good optional operating system for modern aquafarming because it has reduced the amount of cost for supplementary feed, earlier it was assumed that 60% of the cost was needed to cover up the aquaculture production (Zimmermann et al., 2023; Lim et al., 2003). To keep the biofloc in a safe and good condition water quality maintenance is very crucial. All water
Table 5: Growth parameters of stinging catfish (H. fossilis) at fry stage under different treatments of biofloc technology after 60 days culture period.
Parameters |
T1(Control) |
T2(BFT 75%) |
T3(BFT 50%) |
T4(BFT 25%) |
Initial weight (g) |
0.51±0.02 |
0.52±0.03 |
0.51±0.03 |
0.53±0.03 |
Final weight (g) |
3.11±0.10ab |
3.34±0.13ab |
2.91±0.07a |
2.85±0.06a |
Weight gain (g) |
2.60±0.11ab |
2.82±0.14b |
2.39±0.08a |
2.32±0.06a |
SGR (%) |
2.00±0.12 |
1.98±0.17 |
1.98±0.16 |
1.93±0.19 |
RGR (%) |
528.96±37.04 |
589.67±55.70 |
490.33±40.96 |
472.31±41.81 |
PER (%) |
2.98 |
2.05 |
2.77 |
2.87 |
FCR |
1.05±0.05 |
0.78±0.03 |
0.81±0.04 |
0.85±0.04 |
Survival rate (%) |
87.0 |
89.0 |
91.0 |
86.0 |
Superscripts in an individual row indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05.
quality parameters like Dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, salinity, TDS, TAN, ammonia etc were found in the optimum range throughout the culture operation (Table 3) which agreed with the research of Boyd (1979). The temperature level monitored by (Keer et al., 2018) is similar to our research. The level of pH fluctuated during the period of nursing. Azim and Little (2008) observed the level of pH of O. niloticus which is very much suitable with our findings. Dissolved oxygen is a major parameter needed to be maintained for better growth of fish. Also, this DO observe in BFT for better survival for fish (Khanjani et al., 2024; Rahman, 2005; Mcgrawet al., 2001). Ammonia level is extremely maintained in our experiment because this ammonia residue is a very toxic compound which creates great havoc for fish, this ammonia and TAN components optimum level maintenance followed by the study of (Khanjani et al., 2024; Samocha et al., 2004). Ammonia concentration converted in the heterotrophic bacterial community in the indoor raceway system during the GIFT tilapia rearing (Felix et al., 2015). In commercial species cultures like marine shrimp, the water quality is also maintained in a tolerable range (Lara et al., 2017). The water temperature and DO of the hatchery were in an optimum condition of our experiment, relating to this pH sometimes got fluctuated with the water because of the related factor with photosynthesis (Ebeling et al., 2006). Continuous mixing of water and to avoid biofloc deposition enough air supply is necessary, excess feed and waste products increase the ammonia concentration (Chen et al., 2023; Hargreaves, 2013). Ammonia and other TAN compounds in the experiment were found higher in different treatments compared to the control and this scenario match the findings of (Luo et al., 2020; Ekasari, 2009).
Growth parameters of H. fossils are found best in BFT T2 (75% feed + 25% floc) with the best output of FCR, as we know the very little amount of FCR value give the best output in the feed utilization. FCR count with the output of fish production got a brilliant observation with the report of (Xu and Pan, 2012). BFT technology is an additional supplement which develops the growth of desired fish (Wasielesky et al., 2006). Also, lowering the FCR value for biofloc systems leads to a positive rate of production (Zablon et al., 2022; Das and Ray, 1989). BFT is a very profitable culture system in which useful bacteria convert ammonia to a non-toxic material (e.g. nitrate) that promotes phytoplankton growth. Some growth parameters of GIFT tilapia under the AFM culture system were found to increase with the usage of floc (Long et al., 2015). In our experiment, weight gain was observed higher in BFT T2 (75% feed + 25% floc), a similar observation made by (Gall and Bakar, 1999). Weight gain, FCR, and SGR were good in biofloc with red light treatment (Volpato et al., 2013). The common carp exhibits enhanced growth rates and gastrointestinal enzymatic action when bioflocs are included with the meal at BFT 75% (Najdegerami et al. 2016). In lowest stocking density rather than the higher stocking density had higher productivity and higher growth performance stated by (Malik et al., 2014). Yun et al. (2016) conducted that growth and productivity were higher in integrated biofloc culture systems. The result of the research showed the highest SGR value in the trial of T1 (control) and lower in T4, but on the other hand, (Oh et al., 2007) observed a different scenario compared with our studies, it could be because of the size of fishes or maybe the stocking densities. In biofloc tank addition of carbohydrates improved the growth and survivability but there was no significant difference in SGR, FCR so they thought that carbohydrates enriched the food acceptance by the fish (Avnimelech, 2007; Emerenciano et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2012). Several positive effects of BFT on various growth parameters were observed previously in a lot of experimental fishes like O. mossambicus (Avnimelech, 2007), M. rosenbergii (Asaduzzaman et al., 2008), L. vannamei (Burford et al., 2004) and C. auratus (Wang et al., 2015). During the experiment, the survival rate (%) (Figure 1E) was found similar to the analysis done by (Najdegerami et al., 2016). During the experiment zero water exchange was maintained according to the protocol followed by numerous researchers which has been reported in previous studies (Crab et al., 2009; Long et al., 2015). Additionally, BFT enhances biodiversity, resilience, and the establishment of elevated cultivation facilities without a water outflow during the whole farming season. More studies should be done to determine the best technique to control the BFT in aquaculture systems (Viau et al., 2013).
Xu and Pan (2012) demonstrated that shrimp reared in biofloc systems had better FCR compared to those in non-biofloc environments. Ekasari and Maryam (2012) found that Oreochromis sp. cultured in biofloc systems had lower mortality due to disease compared to those in conventional systems. A study by (Avnimelech and Kochba, 2009) showed that the additional nutrition provided by biofloc resulted in better growth rates of tilapia when compared to traditional aquaculture systems without biofloc. Crab et al. (2009) reported that biofloc technology effectively removed ammonia and nitrite from aquaculture water, resulting in significantly better survival rates of tilapia species.
This experiment suggests that the H. fossilis fry rearing in a nursery condition through biofloc technology could be possible and it could lead to a good quality of fish seed for the production system.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based to the findings, BFT T2 (75% feed + 25% floc) supplementation improved the growth and survival rate of H. fossilis fry reared in the biofloc culture method. BFT increased the specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, and survival rate. This BFT method has the potential to promote sustainable aquaculture by improving water quality, reducing feed requirements, and increasing productivity to increase profit in shing aquaculture via a better fry supply for future production.
Declarations
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Education’s National Science and Technology (NST) fellowship program. The author also expresses heartfelt gratitude to the Sylhet Agricultural University Research System (SAURES) and BANBEIS (Bangladesh Bureau of Educational Information and Statistics), Ministry of Education, Bangladesh, for financial supporting of this research.
Funding
Grants for Advanced Research in Education (GARE), BANBEIS, Ministry of Education (MoE), Bangladesh (PCN LS2019996).
IRB approval
This research was approved, monitored and evaluated by Sylhet Agricultural University Research System (SAURES).
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
APHA, 2012. American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington DC.
Asaduzzaman, M., Wahab, M.A., Verdegem, M.C.J., Huque, S., Salam, M.A. and Azim, M.E., 2008. C/N ratio control and substrate addition for periphyton development jointly enhance freshwater prawn Macrobrachiumrosenbergii production in ponds. Aquaculture, 280: 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.04.019
Avnimelech, Y., 2007. Feeding with microbial flocs by tilapia in minimal discharge bio-flocs technology ponds. Aquaculture, 264: 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.11.025
Avnimelech, Y., 2011. Tilapia production using Bio Floc Technology (BFT).
Avnimelech, Y. and Kochba, M., 2009. Evaluation of nitrogen uptake and excretion by tilapia in bio floc tanks, using 15N tracing. Aquaculture, 287: 163-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.10.009
Azim, M.E. and Little, D.C., 2008. The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: water quality, biofloccomposition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 283: 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.036
Boyd, C.E., 1979. Water quality in warm water fish ponds. Craftmaster Auburn, Alabama, USA, Printers Inc.
Burford, M.A., Sellars, M.J., Arnold, S.J., Keys, S.J., Crocos, P.J. and Preston, N.P., 2004. Contribution of the natural biota associated with substrates to the nutritional requirements of the post-larval shrimp, Penaeus esculentus (Haswell), inhigh-density rearing systems. Aquacult. Res., 35: 508-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2004.01052.x
Chen, S., Sun, X., Tian, X., Jiang, W., Dong, X. and Li, L., 2023. Influence of ammonia nitrogen management strategies on microbial communities in biofloc-based aquaculture systems. Sci. Total Environ., 903: 166159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166159
Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Publ., Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Crab, R., Kochva, M., Verstraete, W. and Avnimelech, Y., 2009. Bio-flocs technology application in over-wintering of tilapia. Aquacult. Eng., 40: 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2008.12.004
Das, I. and Ray, A.K., 1989. Growth performance of Indian major carps Labeo rohita (Ham.) on duckweed incorporated pelleted feed: A preliminary study. J. Inland Fish. Soc. India, 21: 1-6. https://eurekamag.com/research/007/386/007386425.php
DoF, 2019. Yearbook of Fisheries Statistics of Bangladesh, 2018-19. Fisheries Resources Survey System (FRSS), Department of Fisheries, Bangladesh: Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, 2019. Volume 36: 135p.
Ebeling, J.M., Timmons, M.B. and Bisogni, J.J., 2006. Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal of ammonia–nitrogen in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 257: 346-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.019
Ekasari, J., 2009. Bioflocs technology: Theory and application in intensive aquaculture system. J. Akuakult. Indonesia, 8: 117-126. https://doi.org/10.19027/jai.8.117-126
Ekasari, J. and Maryam, S., 2012. Evaluation of biofloc technology application on water quality and production performance of red tilapia Oreochromis sp. cultured at different stocking densities. Hayati J. Biosci., 19: 73-80. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.19.2.73
El-Sayed, A.F.M., 2021. Use of biofloc technology in shrimp aquaculture: A comprehensive review, with emphasis on the last decade. Rev. Aquacult., 13: 676-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12494
Emerenciano, M., Cuzon, G., Goguenheim, J., Gaxiola, G. and Aquacop., 2012. Floccontribution on spawning performance of blue shrimp Litopenaeusstylirostris. Aquacult. Res., 44: 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03012.x
FAO, 2022. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022 Sustainability in Action, FAO, Rome.
FAO, 2023. The state of food and agriculture 2023 – Revealing the true cost of food to transform agrifood systems. Rome.
Felix, S., Antony, C. and Rajaram, R., 2015. Studies on nursery rearing of genetically improved farmed tilapia (gift) in bio-secured raceway systems in India. 한국수산과학회양식분과학술대회, pp. 134-134. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE06398940
Gall, G.A. and Bakar, Y., 1999. Stocking density and tank size in the design of breed improvement programs for body size of tilapia. Aquaculture, 173: 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00487-6
Gao, L., Shan, H.W., Zhang, T.W., Bao, W.Y. and Ma, S., 2012. Effects of carbohydrate addition on Litopenaeusvannamei intensive culture in a zero-water exchange system. Aquaculture, 342: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.02.022
Hambrey, J., 2017. The 2030 agenda and the sustainable development goals: The challenge for aquaculture development and management. FAO Fish. Aquacult. Circ., (C1141. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20183138721
Hargreaves, J.A., 2013. Biofloc production systems for aquaculture. Stoneville, MS. South. Region. Aquacult. Center, 4503: 1-11
IUCN, Bangladesh, 2000. Red book of threatened fish of Bangladesh. World Conserv. Union Appen., 1: 61.
Keer, N.R., Datta, M.K., Patel, A.B., Priyanka, R., Rathor, M.K. and Das, S., 2018. Effect of stocking density on growth and survival of Cirrhinusreba (Hamilton, 1822) during spawn to fry nursing (outdoor). J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 6: 640-643. https://www.entomoljournal.com/archives/2018/vol6issue1/PartI/5-6-431-180.pdf
Khanjani, M.H., Mohammadi, A. and Emerenciano, M.G.C., 2024. Water quality in biofloc technology (BFT): an applied review for an evolving aquaculture. Aquacult. Int., 32: 9321–9374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-024-01618-w
Lara, G., Krummenauer, D., Abreu, P.C., Poersch, L.H. and Wasielesky, W., 2017. The use of different aerators on Litopenaeus vannamei biofloc culture system: Effects on water quality, shrimp growth and biofloc composition. Aquacult. Int., 25: 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0019-8
Lim, L.C., Dhert, P. and Sorgeloos, P., 2003. Recent developments in the application of live feeds in the freshwater ornamental fish culture. Aquaculture, 227: 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00512-X
Long, L., Yang, J., Li, Y., Guan, C. and Wu, F., 2015. Effect of biofloc technology on growth, digestive enzyme activity, hematology, and immune response of genetically improved farmed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 448: 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.05.017
Luo, G., Xu, J. and Meng, H., 2020. Nitrate accumulation in biofloc aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 520: 734675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734675
Malik, D., Singh, S., Thakur, J., Singh, R.K., Kaur, A. and Nijhawan, S., 2014. Heavy metal pollution of the Yamuna River: An introspection. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 3: 856-863. https://www.ijcmas.com/vol-3-10/Darshan%20Malik,%20et%20al.pdf
McGraw, W., Teichert-Coddington, D.R., Rouse, D.B. and Boyd, C.E., 2001. Higher minimum dissolved oxygen concentrations increase penaeid shrimp yields in earthen ponds. Aquaculture, 199: 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00530-0
Monir, M.S. and Rahman, S., 2015. Effect of stocking density on growth, survival and production of shing (Heteropneustesfossilis) fingerlings under nursery ponds in Northern region of Bangladesh. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud., 2: 81-86.
Mugwanya, M., Dawood, M.A., Kimera, F. and Sewilam, H., 2021. Biofloc systems for sustainable production of economically important aquatic species: A review. Sustainability, 13: 7255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137255.
Najdegerami, E.H., Bakhshi, F. and Lakani, F.B., 2016. Effects of biofloc on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities and liver histology of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) fingerlings in zero-water exchange system. Fish Physiol. Biochem., 42: 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-015-0151-9
Naylor, R.L., Goldburg, R.J., Primavera, J.H., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M., Clay, J. and Troell, M., 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature, 405: 1017-1024. https://doi.org/10.1038/35016500
Oh, S.Y., Noh, C.H. and Cho, S.H., 2007. Effect of restricted feeding regimes on compensatory growth and body composition of red sea bream, Pagrus major. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 38: 443-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2007.00116.x
Puvaneswari, S., Marimuthu, K., Karuppasamy, R. and Haniffa, M.A. 2009. Early embryonic and larval development of Indian catfish, Heteropneustesfossilis. Eurasian J. Biosci., 3: 84-96. https://doi.org/10.5053/ejobios.2009.3.0.12
Rahman, A.K.A., 2005. Freshwater fishes of Bangladesh, 2nd ed. Zoological Society of Bangladesh, Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, pp. 394.
Samocha, T.M., Lawrence, A.L., Collins, C.A., Castille, F.L., Bray, W.A., Davies, C.J. and Wood, G.F., 2004. Production of the pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in high-density greenhouse-enclosed raceways using low salinity groundwater. J. appl. Aquacult., 15: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1300/J028v15n03_01
Sarker, P.K., Kapuscinski, A.R., Lanois, A.J., Livesey, E.D., Bernhard, K.P. and Coley, M.L., 2016. Towards sustainable aquafeeds: Complete substitution of fish oil with marine microalga Schizochytrium sp. improves growth and fatty acid deposition in juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). PLoS One, 11: e0156684. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156684
Serfling, S.A., 2006. Microbial flocs: Natural treatment method supports freshwater, marine species in recirculating systems. Glob. Aquacult. Advoc., 9: 34-36.
Taw, N., 2010. Biofloc technology expanding at white shrimp farms. Global aquaculture advocate.
Viau, V.E., de Souza, D.M., Rodríguez, E.M., Wasielesky Jr, W., Abreu, P.C. and Ballester, E.L., 2013. Biofilm feeding by post larvae of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeusbrasiliensis (Decapoda, Penaidae. Aquacult. Res., 44: 783-794. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03087.x
Volpato, G.L., Bovi, T.S., Freitas, R.H., Silva, D.F., Delicio, H.C., Giaquinto, P.C. and Barreto, R.E., 2013. Red light stimulates feeding motivation in fish but does not Improve growth. PLoS One, 8: e59134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059134
Wang, G., Yu, E., Xie, J., Yu, D., Li, Z., Luo, W. and Zheng, Z., 2015. Effect of C/N ratio on water quality in zero-water exchange tanks and the biofloc supplementation in feed on the growth performance of crucian carp, Carassius auratus. Aquaculture, 443: 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.03.015
Wasielesky Jr, W., Atwood, H., Stokes, A. and Browdy, C.L., 2006. Effect of natural production in a zero-exchange suspended microbial floc based super-intensive culture system for white shrimp Litopenaeusvannamei. Aquaculture, 258: 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.04.030
Xu, W.J. and Pan, L.Q., 2012. Effects of bioflocs on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and body composition of juvenile Litopenaeusvannamei in zero-water exchange tanks manipulating C/N ratio in feed. Aquaculture, 356: 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.05.022
Yun, H., Shahkar, E., Katya, K., Jang, I.K., Kim, S.K. and Bai, S.C., 2016. Effects of bioflocson dietary protein requirement in juvenile whiteleg shrimp, Litopenaeusvannamei. Aquacult. Res., 47: 3203-3214. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12772
Zablon, W.O., Ogello, E.O., Getabu, A. and Omondi, R., 2022. Biofloc system improves protein utilization efficiency and growth performance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus fry: Experimental evidence. Aquacult. Fish Fish., 2: 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.32
Zimmermann, S., Kiessling, A. and Zhang, J., 2023. The future of intensive tilapia production and the circular bioeconomy without effluents: Biofloc technology, recirculation aquaculture systems, bio-RAS, partitioned aquaculture systems and integrated multitrophic aquaculture. Rev. Aquacult., 15: 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12744
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?