Effects of Storage Time on the Chemical and Microbiological Quality of Pasteurized Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) Juice with Enzyme Extraction and Clarification
Effects of Storage Time on the Chemical and Microbiological Quality of Pasteurized Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) Juice with Enzyme Extraction and Clarification
Abdussalam Muhyideen Zainab Funmilayo and Lee-Hoon Ho*
Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, School of Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 22200 Besut Campus, Malaysia.
Abstract | Unprocessed beetroot juice has a short shelf life. Pasteurization had been one of the common techniques practised in beverage industry for prolonging shelf life of juice. This research was conducted to determine effect of storage time on the biochemical and microbiological quality of enzymatically pasteurized beetroot juice. A 3:1 ratio was used to blend the beetroot pulp with distilled water. After that, pectinase was added at a concentration of 1.5 U/mL for 4hrs and 40°C, and then clarified with pectinase and cellulase and their combination, at concentration of 1.0 U/ mL for 50°C and 15 min. After that, the mixtures were all kept at 90°C for five minutes in order to pasteurize the juice. Beetroot juice without treatment: fresh juice and juice with enzyme extraction but not pasteurised nor clarified served as control 1 and control 2, respectively. The juices were evaluated for pH, total titratable acidity, total soluble solids, vitamin C content, and microbial load at six-day intervals for 30 days. The pH and vitamin C content of the beetroot juices significantly (p <0.05) decreased during storage. However, there was no significant influence on the total soluble solids over storage time. The total titratable acidity of the juices showed significantly (p <0.05) increase over the storage time. The untreated beetroot juice showed be consumed in less than 6 days, while 24 days’ storage for pasteurised enzyme-clarified beetroot juice is safe for human consumption. This research had contributed to the beverage industry in show-casing the shelf life of beetroot juice pasteurized and clarified with enzymes as well as the untreated beetroot juices.
Received | February 22, 2024; Accepted | September 06, 2024; Published | October 09, 2024
*Correspondence | Lee-Hoon Ho, Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, School of Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 22200 Besut Campus, Malaysia; Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Citation | Funmilayo, A.M.Z. and L-H. Ho. 2024. Effects of storage time on the chemical and microbiological quality of pasteurized beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) juice with enzyme extraction and clarification. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 40(Special issue 1): 69-80.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2024/40/s1.69.80
Keywords | Pasteurised beetroot juice, Enzyme, Extraction, Clarification, Biochemical characteristics, Microbiology quality
Copyright: 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Beetroot (Beta vulgaris) is also referred to as the table beet, garden beet, dinner beet, or golden beet. In Malaysia, it is locally known as “bit.”. Beetroot is included in the subfamily “Betoideae” of the family “amaranthaceae” (including the chenopodiaceae) (Kadereit et al., 2006; Romeiras et al., 2016). According to a report by Industry ARC (2018), the global market for fruit and vegetable juices is projected to reach around US$ 57 billion by 2025, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 5.93% over the forecast period. This significant growing in the beverages industry is attributed to rising consumer demand driven by health and convenience considerations (Abid et al., 2013). However, due to their water activity and high moisture content, fresh vegetables and fruit juices are subdued to rapid enzymatic and microbial spoilage during storage (Sharma et al., 2014) thereby causing rejection of the juice by consumers and financial losses for the producers. Fresh beetroot can be transformed into juice with the aid of enzymes through thermal processing in order to preserve their quality (Zainab and Ho, 2021).
Among the cause of the vegetable juice contaminant with potentially harmful microorganisms is being due to consistent application of natural fertilizers in ecological agriculture (Libudzisz et al., 2008). Moreover, depending on the environmental conditions, pathogenic bacteria survive in soil over a long duration (Justyna and Monika, 2018). Bacteria and molds may spoil beetroot juice either by direct action of microbes or indirectly by the uptake of metabolites as off-flavors and toxins (Beartriz de cassia et al., 2014). Low acid vegetables are usually resistant to the growth of some harmful microbes such as Listeria monocytogens, Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella species, Escherichia coli 0157:H7 or Staphylococcus aureus (Sokolowska et al., 2011; Torres-vitela et al., 2013; Aneja et al., 2014). These leads to the lowering of vegetable juices pH by some manufacturers by using ascorbic acid for safety and extension of the fresh juice shelf life. Despite these efforts, coliforms and Listeria species are the most frequently found pathogens in unpasteurized fresh beetroot (Buck et al., 2003; Sokolowska et al., 2011). Some of these microbes may remain in juice even after extensive procedures (Beartriz de cassia et al., 2014). Generally, spoilage is usually exhibited as an off- odour or flavor of a chemical or medicinal nature due to the formation of guaiacol and halo phenols (Yamazaki et al., 1996; Chang and Kang, 2004; Chen et al., 2006) leading to rejections by consumers (Zierler et al., 2004).
Therefore, various physical treatments such as conventional pasteurization, microwave heating, Ohmic heating, pulsed electric fields (PEF), thermos sonication, hydrostatic pressure (HHP), light treatment, and super critical carbondioxide (Leneveu-jenvrin et al., 2020b) have been in existence to inactivate both microbes and enzymes in order to extend the shelf-life of the product (Noci et al., 2008; Leneveu-Jenvrin et al., 2019) and preserve the freshness of beetroot juice. However, the aforementioned processing technologies requires high cost that might not be affordable for small and medium enterprises (Fryer and Versteeg, 2008; Madrid-Guijarro et al., 2009). Nowadays, thermal pasteurization had been affordable to use for small scale processing units. However, the potential of this technique to produce quality juice is needed to be greatly investigated. Ubeira-Iglesias et al. (2019) investigated the microbiological, nutritional, and sensory aspects of beetroot juice processed under high hydrostatic pressure. It was discovered that the beetroot juice had a microbiological shelf life of 21 days (Ubeira-Iglesias et al., 2019). Czyzowska et al. (2020) investigated the microbial quality of stored fermented beetroot juice, the results indicated that lactic acid bacteria were predominant among the bacteria microbiota tested. However, there is no research yet on the storage studies on microbiological quality of enzyme extracted and clarified beetroot juice via pasteurization process. Therefore, this research has described the effect of storage time on biochemical and microbiological quality of unpasteurized and pasteurized enzyme extracted and clarified beetroot juices.
Materials and Methods
Sample preparation
Fresh and ripe beetroot (Beta vulgaris L) was acquired in Terengganu, Malaysia’s Besut District’s local wet market. Prior to procurement, the beetroot’s physical quality was evaluated. The two commercial enzymes (pectinase (DIS-1030) and cellulase (DIS-1017) were purchased from Creative Enzymes (New York, USA).
Fruit juice preparation
After washing with water, the purchased beetroot was peeled and sliced into small pieces. A homogenous slurry was then achieved by blending it with distilled water in a 1:3 ratio. Following a 4 hours incubation period at 40°C in a water bath, the pulp was treated with pectinase at a concentration of 1.5 units per milliliter (U/mL). In order to clarify the extracted juice, each 50 mL of the juice was treated with 1 U/mL of pectinase, cellulase, or a combination of pectinase and cellulase. The juice was incubated for 15 minutes at 50 °C in a water bath. After that, each mixture was held at 90 °C for five minutes in order to pasteurize the juice (Padma et al., 2017). The control 1 indicates fresh juice; control 2 shows pectinase extracted juice but not undergone pasteurisation nor clarification; PPTJ was the pasteurised juice clarified with pectinase; PCTJ indicates pasteurised juice clarified with cellulase; PPCTJ was the pasteurised juice clarified with an enzyme combination (pectinase + cellulase). Both the treated and untreated juices were stored at 4 oC for 30 days. Thereafter, all the stored juices were evaluated for biochemical properties and microbiological quality at six-day intervals of storage time.
Determination of pH value
Prior to the analysis, pH 4 and pH 5 buffer solutions were used to calibrate the pH meter. A pH meter was then used to ascertain the beetroot juice samples’ pH value.
Total soluble solid content
A hand-held refractometer with a 0–20 ºBrix scale was used to measure the total soluble solids content. Degrees Brix (°Bx) were used to express the value (Ho et al., 2020).
Total titratable acidity
The beetroot juice samples’ total titratable acidity was calculated using the methods outlined by Antony and Chandra (1997). A five millilitres sample of beetroot juice was titrated against sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at a concentration of 0.05 M. To ascertain the titration’s end point, phenolphthalein indicator solution (~2-3 drops) were added to the mixture prior to titration. Oxalic acid (%) was used to express the total titratable acidity.
Analysis of vitamin C content
The AOAC Standard Method (2005) was used to determine the vitamin C content of the beetroot samples. A titration against a 0.1 M iodine solution was performed after beetroot juice sample (10 mL) was combined with distilled water (10 mL) . 0.5 mL of starch indicator was added to the mixture prior to titration. The titration ended at the first trace of a dark blue-black colour that was still visible. The amount of vitamin C was given in mg/ 100 mL of juice.
Microbial analyses
According to standard AACC method, method 42-50 and 42-11, respectively of mould and yeast counts (MYC) and aerobic plate counts (APC) were carried out using the aerobic spread plate count method. A 1 to 1 × 10-4 sample dilution was made. To obtain homogenized sampling, each dilution was shaken. After that, 1 mL of each sample dilution was pipetted onto the appropriate petri dish for MYC and APC analyses, which contained potato dextrose agar and plate count agar (PCA Oxoid, England), respectively. By carefully rotating the plates, all of the diluted samples were distributed across the agar’s surface. For the APC and MYC plates, the inoculated plates were incubated at 37 oC for 24 hours and at 25 oC for five days, respectively (AACC, 2000).
Statistical analysis
Experimental data were processed using IBM SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp, Armonk, N.Y., USA), version 25.0. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by a Tukey test, to analyze the significant differences between the sample means at a significance level of p <0.05.
Results and Discussion
pH, total titratable acidity, and total soluble solids of beetroot juices during 30 days of storage at 4 oC
The results of the pH, total soluble solids (°Bx), and total titratable acidity (%), of beetroot juice after storage at 4°C for 30 days are tabulated in Table 1. Considering the pH value for each sample during 30 days of storage, the pH for all the samples (i.e., control 1, control 2, pasteurised pectinase treated juice (PPTJ), pasteurised cellulase treated juice (PCTJ), pasteurised pectinase + cellulase treated juice (PPCTJ)) were significantly (p <0.05) different among the days of storage within the same sample. This may be due to spoilage of the juice from days to days by microorganisms (Cortes et al., 2008). Shamsudin et al. (2020), reported similar result where they had noticed a decrease in pH value of an untreated pineapple + mango juice blend through 25 days’ storage in a refrigerator at 4±2 °C at 5 days’ interval. Begum et al. (2018) experienced a decline in pH value of mango + pineapple + orange juice blend pasteurized for 5 min at 80 °C and then stored at -20 °C during 30 days of storage and recorded that the juice might be affected by microbial activities due to the carbohydrate degradation available in the juice blend. The rise in population/colony of microorganisms has cause more acid release due to fermentation, then cause pH to value drop. According to the authors, the juice might be affected by microbial activities as a result of the carbohydrate degradation available in the juice blend (Begum et al., 2018). Nidhi et al. (2007) also reported a decline in pH value during storage of untreated mango + papaya + pineapple juice and bael + guava juice.
Table 1: pH, total titratable acidity, and total soluble solids of beetroot juices during 30 days of storage at 4 oC1.
Samples2 |
Days of storage |
pH |
Total titratable acidity (% of oxalic acid) |
Total soluble solids (°Bx) |
Control 1 |
0 6 12 18 24 30 |
6.32±0.01f C 5.07±0.03 c B 5.15±0.02 d B 4.97±0.03 b B 5.28±0.01 e B 4.84±0.05 a B |
0.15±0.01 b A 0.19±0.02 d A 0.19±0.01 d A 0.20±0.01 d A 0.16±0.01 c A 0.07±0.01 a A |
4.83±0.06 b A 4.97±0.06 b A 4.97±0.06 b A 5.00±0.00 b A 5.00±0.00 b A 4.17±0.29 a A |
Control 2 |
0 6 12 18 24 30 |
6.14±0.01 e B 4.87±0.02 d A 4.77±0.02 c A 4.69±0.01 b A 4.70±0.02 b A 4.63±0.01 a A |
0.20±0.01 a B 0.22±0.01 a A 0.32±0.01 b B 0.37±0.02 c B 0.33±0.01 b B 0.36±0.02 bc B |
4.80±0.00 b A 5.00±0.00 b A 5.00±0.00 b A 5.17±0.29 b A 5.00±0.00 b A 4.33±0.29 a AB |
PPTJ |
0 6 12 18 24 30 |
6.07±0.02 c A 6.20±0.01 d D 6.04±0.01 b D 6.01±0.01 b D 6.02±0.01 b D 5.98±0.01 a C |
0.40±0.01 b C 0.36±0.01 a C 0.42±0.02 b C 0.47±0.01 c C 0.45±0.02 c C 0.48±0.01 c D |
4.93±0.01 a A 5.00±0.00 a A 5.00±0.00 a A 5.00±0.00 a A 4.97±0.01 a A 4.67±0.29 a AB |
PCTJ |
0 6 12 18 24 30 |
6.06±0.01 c A 6.20±0.02 d D 6.03±0.00 b D 6.02±0.01 b D 6.01±0.01 ab D 5.99±0.00 a C |
0.42±0.01 ab C 0.41±0.02 a D 0.41±0.01 ab C 0.42±0.01 ab C 0.43±0.01 b C 0.44±0.01 b C |
4.93±0.01 a A 5.00±0.00 b A 5.00±0.00 b A 5.00±0.00 b A 5.00±0.00 b A 5.00±0.00 b B |
PPCTJ |
0 6 12 18 24 30 |
6.06±0.00 d A 6.14±0.01 e C 5.97±0.00 c C 5.95±0.01 ab C 5.96±0.00 bc C 5.94±0.01 a C |
0.41±0.10 b C 0.33±0.15 a B 0.42±0.20 b C 0.44±0.40 b C 0.43±0.01 b C 0.45±0.01 b C |
4.83±0.01 a A 5.00±0.00 a A 5.00±0.00 a A 5.00±0.00 a A 4.97±0.01 a A 4.83±0.29 a AB |
Different superscript lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant (p <0.05) difference for each beetroot juice sample in proportion to storage time (0-30 days). Different superscript upper-case letters in the same column indicate significant (p <0.05) difference between beetroot juices at the same storage day. 1Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). 2Control 1: Fresh juice, non-enzyme treated nor pasteurised; Control 2: Pectinase extracted but not pasteurised nor clarified juice; PPTJ: Pasteurised pectinase clarified juice; PCTJ: Pasteurised cellulase clarified juice; PPCTJ: pasteurised pectinase + cellulase clarified juice
For the total titratable acidity, the result shows an increasing trend. The rise in total titratable acidity during storage might be due to the decline in pH, as acidity and pH are inversely proportional to one another (Islam et al., 2014). Shamsudin et al. (2020) also reported higher total titratable acidity in pineapple + mango juice during 25 days of storage refrigerated at 4 °C, they recorded that the changes in total titratable acidity during storage might be due to the release of acids from the juice particles. Begum et al. (2018) revealed that the increase in the total titratable acidity for 30 days storage of pasteurized pineapple + mango juice blend at -20 °C might also be due to microbial activity, especially the acid producing microorganisms (Seema, 2015). Furthermore, Desrosier and Singh (2018) explained that yeast promote fermentation in fruits by breaking down of sugars into carbon dioxide and alcohol. Moreover, moulds cause lots of vegetable rots by changing their texture, colour and acidic products. Moulds grow at range of pH 3-8 in which some of them are able to grow in refrigerators due to different species having different optimal growth temperatures (Seema, 2015).
In comparing the total soluble solids of storage days for each sample (Table 1), The differences in all the beetroot juice samples that had undergone pasteurisation process, during the 30 days storage period were not significant, except sample PCTJ. This is in support of a research by Leneveu-Jenvrin et al. (2020a) on the storage studies of pasteurised and unpasteurised pineapple juice, whereby the difference in the total soluble solids of the juice samples (pasteurised and unpasteurised) were not significant. Moreover, control 1 and control 2 did not have significant difference from day 0 until day 24, thereafter, a significant decreased on day 30 was observed. This is due to the utilization of the sugar by yeast and mould as a result of massive growth of microbes on day 30 (Shamsudin et al., 2014).
In comparing the pH value among the samples (control 1, control 2, PPTJ, PCTJ, and PPCTJ) at storage days. Pasteurized enzyme clarified beetroot juice (PPTJ, PCTJ, PPCTJ) had significant (p <0.05) higher pH value than the unpasteurised beetroot juice samples (control 1 and control 2) except for the first day of storage, whereby the unpasteurized juices had higher pH value than the pasteurized and clarified juices. Also, control 2 (enzyme extracted juice but not pasteurised) had significant (p <0.05) higher pH value than control 1 (fresh untreated nor pasteurised juice) through storage period. The decline in the pH of the pasteurised juices and control 2 as compared to control 1 on the day 0 of storage might be as a result of the release of carboxyl groups and galacturonic acid from polysaccharides and pectin after enzyme treatment of the juices (Reddy et al., 2018). The significant lower pH of the unpasteurised beetroot juice as compared to the pasteurised juice was due to the spoilage of the unpasteurised juice. Yeasts and mould have the ability to grow at low pH and high sugar concentration (Kamal et al., 2014). Pasteurization at temperature of 90-95 °C for 4-10 seconds has been able to achieve Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendation of 5log10 reduction of infection pathogens in a fruit juice (ICMSF, 2005; Mosqueda-Melgar et al., 2012). Temperature at 95 °C is very effective against Salmonella and Escherichia coli (Danyluk et al., 2011). However, it was as well noted that PPTJ and PCTJ had significant (p <0.05) higher pH value as compared with PPCTJ from day 6 until day 24. This shows that PPTJ and PCTJ are significantly quality as compared with PPCTJ.
For total titratable acidity, all the pasteurised samples (PPTJ, PCTJ, and PPCTJ) had a significant (p <0.05) higher total titratable acidity value than the unpasteurised (control 1 and control 2) juice samples, likewise, Control 2 had significant (p <0.05) higher total titratable acidity value as compared to Control 1 except at day 6 of storage, whereby both showed insignificant difference in total titratable acidity (0.19% and 0.22% for control 1 and control 2, respectively). This might be due to the release of carboxylic acids and galacturonic acids as a result of the enzymatic treatment of the juice in, as pectinase facilitates pectin hydrolysis through de-esterification and the breakdown of polysaccharides (Joshi et al., 2011; Akesowan and Choonhahirun, 2013). Hence, the rising of oxalic acid released during enzyme activity. Moreover, Seow et al. (2015) reported that high titratable acidity means high organic acid contents. Furthermore, these organic acids contribute to palatability and flavour of fruit juices (Maria Rita et al., 2017). Juice with greater acidity is more resistant to spoilage by microorganisms and thereby having higher shelf life (Pimentel et al., 2015). This might explain to the results obtained for pasteurised beetroot juice that had higher titratable acidity than unpasteurised beetroot juice throughout the storage days. On the other hand, for the total soluble solids, all the samples had no significant difference. Similar result was observed by Leneveu-Jenvrin et al. (2020a), they recorded an insignificant difference in the total soluble solids of mild heat treatment of pineapple juice during 14 days of storage period.
Vitamin C content of beetroot juices
Vitamin C provides protection against free radicals. It is an important element that possesses antioxidant ability (Esteve et al., 2005). The results of the vitamin C (mg/ 100 mL) content of the beetroot juices over 30 days’ storage period are presented in Figure 1. The results revealed that all the samples had a decreasing trend in vitamin C content during 30 days of storage period. This was due to the oxidation of the juice as ascorbic acid is sensitive to heat, oxygen, and light. Degradation of ascorbic acid during storage might be due to several reasons such as formation of dehydro-ascorbic acid, type of processing of the juice, packing materials and/ or storage temperature (Ayhan et al., 2001; Byanna and Gowda, 2012). This result is in correlation with the report by Shamsudin et al. (2020), a decreasing trend was observed for the vitamin C content of pineapple + mango juice blend along the storage days. Similarly, Islam et al. (2014) reported a decrease in vitamin C content of juice prepared from orange + pineapple during the 35 storage days. Furthermore, vitamin C is considered as a point reference for the nutritional quality of juices (Bull et al., 2004) and as one of the criteria to determine a product shelf life. The shelf life of juice is being considered for juices with as 50% retention of their initial vitamin C content (Shaw, 1992; Torregrosa et al., 2005). All the beetroot juice samples had below 50% retention of their initial vitamin C upon 12th day of storage. However, at day 6, PPTJ had 86.29% of its initial vitamin C value; PCTJ, 82.26%; PPCTJ, 71.79%; control 2, 55.38%; and control 1, 52.04%. The vitamin C content of all the samples significantly remained constant from day 12 until day 30 of storage.
Microbiological activities of beetroot juices
Bacteria, yeast and moulds were examined to access the microbiological quality of the beetroot juice samples. The results of Mould and Yeast Count (MYC) and Aerobic Plate Count (APC) of beetroot juices are presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. Mould and yeasts are the most notable group of microbes involved with spoilage of fruit juices. They can lead to alteration in smell, taste and appearance of the juice due to their metabolic by products such as carbon dioxide, acid and tainting compounds. Acid-tolerant bacteria can also cause spoilage of juice, even though most of the spoilage are usually caused by yeasts and mould in products related to fruits (Hocking and Jensen, 2001; Jay and Anderson, 2001). Results on the MYC showed unpasteurised beetroot juice (control 1 and control 2) to contain 5.69 logCFU/ mL and 5.06 logCFU/ mL respectively of colony before storage (Day 0) (Figure 2). Leneveu-Jenvrin et al. (2020a) reported a similar result of MYC (5 logCFU/ mL) for pineapple juice during zero day of storage. They reported the most likely involvement of yeast and mould in the untreated juice spoilage. Similarly, Oranusi et al. (2012) reported incidence of 5 logCFU/ mL in total fungal count (TFC) of selected commercially packed fruit juices, such as: Citrus burst juice was reported to have 1.0×105 CFU/ g, orange juice, 1.4×105 CFU/ g, pineapple juice, 1.8×105 CFU/ g, and guava juice, 2.6×105 CFU/ g of the TFC. Fresh fruits and fruit juices contain a wide variety of microbes that can be environmental pollutants and raw material (Egemen, 2019). Juice contamination usually results from using inferior fruits (Drusch et al., 2003). Fungi can infest fruits during various stages, including cultivation, harvesting, handling, transport, post-harvest storage as well as during marketing. Fruits storage at lower temperature usually significantly slows down fungal growth, hence, extends fruit shelf life. Refrigeration slows down the spoilage of food and therefore extend the product shelf-life (Salwa et al., 2023). However, many microorganisms can grow at low temperature and cause significant damage to fruits, particularly if they are stored for extended periods (Arias et al., 2002) before being processed to juice. Therefore, unpasteurised products are more contaminated to the pasteurised juice.
Mould and yeast count for sample control 1 (fresh juice) had no significant difference for the whole storage period (0 day to 30 days) except at day 6 which had significant increase in mould and yeast growth (optimum growth), thereafter a constant trend (decreasing) was observed. Similarly, control 2 (Pectinase extracted but not pasteurised nor clarified juice) had a significant increase in mould and yeast growth on the day 6 (optimum growth), but a significant decrease on the day 18 and 24. This indicates the spoilage of the beetroot juice began at earlier processing before storage, while a decrease in the growth was attributed to the population dying (the death phase). This obtained results can be supported by the results obtained for pH value during storage (Table 1), whereby, there was a significant change in the pH value of the juice during storage period. This indicates an increase in the growth rate of yeast and mould. Begum et al. (2018) experienced decline in pH of mango+ pineapple +orange juice blend during 30 days of storage and recorded that the juice might be affected by microbial activities as a result of the carbohydrate degradation in the juice blend. The increase of population/colony of microorganisms has cause more acid release as a result of fermentation. However, the MYC was shown to significantly increase from 5.24 log CFU/ mL to 6.31 log CFU/ mL of colony at day 30 of storage. This was attributed to the fact that most of the cells die (population decrease), then there is less competition among the survive microorganisms for food. The survive microbes then continue to reproduce. The significant increase in mould and yeast growth on the 30 day was attested by significantly reduction in the total soluble solids on the day 30 of storage (Table 1). A larger utilization of sugar by the microorganisms was due to the massive growth of yeast and moulds (Shamsudin et al., 2014). Similar result was observed by Justyna et al. (2018), whereby, beetroot treated with high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) and then stored for 28 days in the refrigerator had decrease in the growth of Escherichia coli ATCC7839IP80.11T (5.42 log CFU/mL) and Escherichia coli 61/14 strain (3.10 log CFU/mL), compared to the initial microbial counts. After 21 days of storage, both the Escherichia coli strain population decreased to approximately 1.0 log CFU/ mL, but on prolonging the storage time to four weeks, there was increased growth rate of these bacteria (Justyna et al., 2018).
The pasteurised juices samples had 1.98 log CFU/ mL of MYC for pasteurized juice clarified with pectinase (PPTJ) or cellulase (PCTJ) and no colony was indicated for the pasteurised juice clarified with pectinase + cellulase (PPCTJ) on the zero day of storage. This shows that the pasteurization process was effectively in inhibiting the growth of the mould and yeast. Similar result was reported by Beartriz de cassia et al. (2014), whereby apples at the reception before processing into juice had mould and yeast growth of 1.3 × 105 CFU/g of colony and washed apples had as high as 1.3×107 CFU/g of colony but significantly decrease to 1.5×102 CFU/g of colony after undergoing pasteurization.
Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the MYC for PPTJ and PCTJ throughout the storage days. For the pasteurised juice clarified with pectinase + cellulase (PPCTJ), a significant increase in colony was observed started on the 6th. This is in conjunction with the pH which also had significant decrease during these days. The increase in the acidity might be due to the releasing of metabolic by products (such as carbon dioxide, lactic acid, ethanol and acetic acid) by microorganisms during their growth (Hocking and Jensen, 2001; Jay and Anderson, 2001). All the pasteurised and enzymatic clarified beetroot juice samples (PPTJ, PCTJ, and PPCTJ) had reached their growth peak on the 30th day at 6 logCFU/ mL. Similarly, Tournas et al. (2006) reported that during their studies on the microbiological quality of packaged fruit salads and pasteurised fruit juices, 22% of fruit juice samples were contaminated with fungi, ranging from <1.0 to 6.83 log10 CFU/mL. According to “good manufacturing practices” (GMP), the standard limit for yeasts in unpasteurized fruit juices is ˂ 103 CFU/mL and ˂10 CFU/mL for pasteurised fruit juices but the maximum acceptable level is set to be 106 CFU/mL (Stannard, 1997; Oranusi et al., 2012). Moreover, Juice containing below 106 CFU/ mL or 6 log CFU/mL of microbial load is within acceptable limit for human consumption (ICMSF, 1994; Stannard et al., 1997; Leneveu-Jenvrin et al., 2020a). Therefore, 24 days of storage was the maximum storage day for pasteurised beetroot juice.
For the aerobic plate count, the result in Figure 3 shows that the unpasteurised juice samples (control 1 and control 2) reached 5.35 log CFU/ mL of colony and 5.14 log CFU/ mL of colony, respectively on the zero day of storage. This indicates a significant presence of bacteria in the juice. Similarly, Justyna and Monika (2018) reported a slightly higher result of 6 log CFU/ mL of colony in untreated beetroot juice for survival of L. innocua strains and E. coli strains on the zero day of storage. Juice containing below 106 CFU/ mL or 6 log CFU/mL of microbial load is within acceptable limit for human consumption (ICMSF, 1994; Stannard et al., 1997; Leneveu-Jenvrin et al., 2020a).
Furthermore, from the results depicted in Figure 3, it was noted that the bacteria colony had significant increase from 5.35 log CFU/ mL to 6.16 log CFU/ mL for control 1 and 5.14 log CFU/ mL to 5.94 log CFU/ mL for control 2 during storage day of zero and 6th, respectively. Aerobic bacteria in both control 1 and control 2 samples had reached their optimum growth on day 12 and thereafter, significantly decrease in colony on the day 30th. The significant decrease of colony was due to population dying (the death phase). Justyna and Monika (2018) also experienced bacteria population dying during the storage studies of unpasteurised and high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) treated beetroot and carrot juice. Furthermore, beetroot juice stored at 5 oC had growth of Listeria innocua (CIP8.11T) by 5.37 log CFU/ mL of colony and Listeria innocua Wild strain 23/13 by 5.15 log CFU/ mL of colony on the zero day of storage but declined to zero on the 28th day. On the other hand, growth of Escherichia coli ATTC7839 at 6.53 log CFU/ mL of colony on zero day of storage was observed and decline to zero on the day 28th for beetroot juice stored at 250c (Justyna and Monika, 2018).
All the pasteurised beetroot juice (PPTJ, PCTJ, and PPCTJ) had no bacterial growth on the zero day of storage. These shows that the pasteurization was effective in inhibiting the vegetative cell of bacteria in the juices. For pasteurised beetroot juice clarified with pectinase (PPTJ), no bacterial growth was observed until the 12th day of storage but significantly increased on the day 18 of storage. Erwinia carotovora, several Pseudomonas species and lactic acid bacteria are important bacteria that causes spoilage. During spoilage, starches and sugars are metabolised producing lactic acid and ethanol. Pseudomonas are gram negative bacteria that need a high-water activity for growth (0.95 or higher). During spoilage, starches and sugars are metabolised, producing lactic acid and ethanol and leading to unpleasant odors and flavors. Some of its species are psychophillic which grow at refrigerator temperatures. Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas viridiglava are two pseudomonas species that account for up to 40% of the naturally occurring bacteria on the surfaces of fruits and vegetables (Seema, 2015). Erwinia carotovara is the most common bacterium responsible for spoilage; it has been detected in nearly every type of vegetable and can grow at refrigeration temperatures (Tournas, 2005). This cool condition triggered the growth of psychrophilic on day 18. Furthermore, a significant rise in bacteria growth was noted on the 6th day of storage for pasteurised beetroot juice clarified with cellulase (PCTJ), This was due to the significant increase in the total soluble solids (Table 1) particularly monosaccharides of the juice during this period which might be caused as a result of the degradation of polysaccharides such as starch, pectin, and cellulose, and its conversion into simple sugar like fructose and glucose (Mohd-Hanif et al., 2016) and available for the use of microorganisms.
Nevertheless, pasteurised beetroot juice clarified with pectinase + cellulase (PPCTJ) showed no bacteria growth until the 6th day of storage, thereafter, a significant sharply increase of bacteria colony at day 12th of storage. This might be due to the growth of acidophiles (acid loving bacteria). These current obtained results can be associated to the pH value that was recorded in Table 1, whereby there was significant decline in the pH value of the beetroot juice (from pH value of 6.14 to 5.97) during this period, thereby significantly becoming more acidic, causing growth of acid loving bacteria.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Overall, pasteurization had significantly influenced the stored beetroot juices clarified with or without enzymes. In general, the values of pH and total soluble solids decrease proportionally to the increase of total titratable acidity during 30 days of storage. Both pasteurization and clarification processes are able to increase the shelf life of the beetroot juice up to 24 days under the cold storage in the refrigerator at 4 oC. However, for the better retention of nutrient such as vitamin C, all the juice samples are best consumed before 12 days of storage. Pasteurised pectinase clarified beetroot juice (PPTJ) or pasteurised cellulase clarified beetroot juice (PCTJ) alone was recommended, considering being cost effective and more stable in compared to pasteurised pectinase + cellulase clarified beetroot juice (PPCTJ).
Acknowledgments
All authors appreciate the technical support of Centralised Lab Management Centre (CLMC), Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin in analyses.
Novelty Statement
Beetroot juice was produced using an innovative method that combines enzyme treatment and pasteurization to enhance its quality and shelf life. The study found that while untreated juice lasts less than 6 days, the pasteurized and enzyme-clarified juice remains safe for consumption for up to 24 days, providing valuable insights for improving shelf life in the beverage industry.
Author’s Contribution
Abdussalam Muhyideen Zainab Funmilayo: Conducted analysis, performed data analysis, wrote the original draft, and edited the writing.
Lee-Hoon Ho: Handled conceptualization, project coordinator, supervision, validation data and reviewed and edited the writing.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
AACC, 2000. Approved methods of the American association of cereal chemists (10th ed.). St. Paul, Minnesota: AACC.
Abid, M., S. Jabbar., T. Wu., M.M. Hashim., B. Hu and S. Lei. 2013. Effect of ultrasound on different quality parameters of apple juice. Ultrason. Sonochem., 21: 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.06.002
Akesowan, A. and A. Choonhahirun. 2013. Effect of enzyme treatment on guava juice production using response surface methodology. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 23: 114–120.
Aneja, K.R., R. Dhiman., N.K. Aggarwal., V. Kumar and M. Kaur. 2014. Microbes associated with freshly prepared juices of citrus and carrots. Int. J. Food Sci., 7: 408085. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/408085
Antony, U. and T.S. Chanrda. 1997. Microbial population and biochemical changes in fermenting finger millet (Eleusine coracana). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 13: 533-537.
AOAC, 2005. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists (18th ed.). (eds. W. Horwitz and G.W. Latimer). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Arias, C.R., J.K. Burns, L.M. Friedrich, R.M. Goodrich and M.E. Parish. 2002. Yeast species associated with orange juice: Evaluation of different identification methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68(4): 1955-1961. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.4.1955-1961.2002
Ayhan, Z., H.W. Teom, Q.H. Zhang and D.B. Min. 2001. Flavour, colour and vitamin C retention of pulsed electric fields processed orange juice in different packaging materials. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49(2): 669-674. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000984b
Beartriz de cassia, M.S., M. Shalana., C.A. Hudson and M.F. Glaucia. 2014. Survey of molds, yeast and Alicyclobacillus species from a concentrate apple juice productive process. Braz. J. Microbiol., 45(1): 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822014000100008
Begum, S., P.C. Das and P. Karmoker. 2018. Processing of mixed fruit juice from mango, orange and pineapple. Fundam. Appli. Agric., 3(2): 440-445. https://doi.org/10.5455/faa.289995
Buck, J.W., R.R. Walcott and L.R. Beuchat. 2003. Recent trends in microbiological safety of fruits and vegetables. Plant Hlth. Prog., 4(1): 25. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2003-0121-01-RV
Bull, M.K., K. Zerdin, E. Howe, D. Goicoechea, P. Paramanandhan, R. Stockman, J. Sellahewa, E.A. Szabo, R.L. Johnson and C.M. Stewart. 2004. The effect of high- pressure processing on the microbial, physical and chemical properties of Valencia and Navel orange juice. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 5: 135- 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2003.11.005
Byanna, C.N. and I.N.D. Gowda. 2012. Standardization of sweet orange and pomegranate blended RTS beverage preparation and its storage. Crops Res., 44(1-2): 109-115.
Chang, S.S. and D.H. Kang. 2004. Alicyclobacillus spp. in the fruit juice industry: History, characteristics, and current isolation/ detection procedures. Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 30(2): 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408410490435089
Chen, S., Q. Tang., X. Zhang., G. Zhao., X. Hu., X. Liaod., F. Chend., J. Wud and H. Xiang. 2006. Isolation and characterization of thero-acidophilic endospore forming bacteria from the concentrated apple juice-processing environment. Food Microbiol., 23: 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2005.07.005
Cortes, C., M.J. Esteve and A. Frigola. 2008. Color of orange juice treated by high intensity pulsed electric fields during refrigerated storage and comparison with pasteurized juice. Food Contr., 19: 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.03.001
Czyzowska, A., K. Siemianowska., M. Śniadowska and A. Nowak. 2020. Bioactive compounds and microbial quality of stored fermented red beetroots and red beetroot juice. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 70: 35-44. https://doi.org/10.31883/pjfns/116611
Danyluk, M.D., L.M. Friedrich, C. Jouquand, R. Goodrich-Schneider, M.E. Parish and R. Rouseff. 2011. Prevalence, concentration, spoilage, and mitigation of Alicyclobacillus spp. in tropical and subtropical fruit juice concentrates. Food Microbiol., 28(3): 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.10.008
Desrosier, N.W. and R.P. Singh. 2018. Food preservation. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/food-preservation
Drusch, S and W. Ragab. 2003. Mycotoxins in fruits, fruit juices, and dried fruits. J. Food Prot., 66(8): 1514-1527. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-66.8.1514
Egemen, I., 2019. Mould and yeast flora in fruit juices at different places in Nicosia. Msc thesis, Near East University. Unpublished.
Esteve, M.J., A. Frígola, C. Rodrigo and D. Rodrigo. 2005. Effect of storage period under variable conditions on the chemical and physical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orange juices. Food Chem. Toxicol., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2005.03.016
Fryer, P.J. and C. Versteeg. 2008. Processing technology innovation in the food industry: Innovation. Innovation, 10: 74–90. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.1.74
Hocking, A.D. and N. Jensen. 2001. Soft drinks, cordials, juices, bottled water and related products. Spoilage of processed foods: Causes and diagnosis, pp. 93-94.
Ho, L.H., Y.S.R.R. Irisha and M. Norlia. 2020. Proximate composition, physicochemical characteristics and sensory evaluation of reduced-calorie belimbi fruit (Averrhoa belimbi) jam with maltitol. Food Res., 4(5): 1545–1553. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.4(5).090
ICMSF (International Commission on Microbiology Specification for Food). 2005. Soft drinks, fruit juices, concentrates and food preserves, in microorganisms in foods 6: Microbial Ecology of Food Commodity, Kluwer Academic Publisher.
ICMSF (International Commission on Microbiology Specification for Food). 1994. Sampling for microbiological Analysis. Principles and Specific Application, University of Toronto press, Toronto pp 1-18.
Industry ARC. 2018. Product (Fruit Juices, Fruit & Vegetable Blends, Vegetable Juices), Fruit and Vegetable Juice Market Size Analysis Report. Retrieved from https://www.industryarc.com/Research/Fruit-And-Vegetable-Juice-Market-Research-509565 6 July 2021
Islam, M.A., I. Ahmad., S. Ahmed and A. Sarker. 2014. Biochemical composition and shelf-life study of mixed fruit juice from orange and pineapple. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour., 7(1): 227-232. https://doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v7i1.22175
Jay, S and J. Anderson. 2001. Fruit juice and related products. Spoilage of processed foods: Causes and diagnosis, In: Moir, CJ, Andrew-Kabilafkas, C, Arnold, BM, Cox, AD, Hocking & Jenson, I (eds), Southwood Press, Sydney, Australia. p. 187–198.
Joshi, V.K., M. Parmar, M and N. Rana. 2011. Purification and characterization of pectinase produced from apple pomace and evaluation of its efficacy in fruit juice extraction and clarification. Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour., 2(2):189-197.
Justyna, N.B.S. and F. Monika. 2018. Long-term storage of vegetable juices treated by high hydrostatic pressure: Assurance of the microbial safety. Biomed. Res. Int., 2018: 7389381. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7389381
Kadereit, G., S. Hohmann and J.W. Kadereit. 2006. A snopsis of chenopodiaceae subfam. Betoideae and notes on the taxonomy of beta. Willdenowia, 36: 9-19. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.36.36101
Kamal R.A., D. Romika, K.A. Neeraj and A. Ashish. 2014. Emerging preservation techniques for controlling spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms in fruit juices. Int. J. Microbiol., 2014: 758942. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/758942
Leneveu-Jenvrin, C., F. Charles, F.J. Barba and F. Remize. 2019. Role of biological control agents and physical treatments in maintaining the quality of fresh and minimally-processed fruit and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1664979
Leneveu-Jenvrin, C., B. Quentin, S. Assemat and F. Remize. 2020a. Maintaining physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory quality of pineapple juice (Ananas comosus, Var. ‘Queen Victoria’) through mild heat treatment. Processes, 8(9): 1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091186
Leneveu-Jenvrin, C., B. Quentin, S. Assemat, M. Hoarau, J.C. Meile and F. Remize. 2020b. Changes of quality of minimally-processed pineapple (Ananas comosus, var. ‘Queen Victoria’) during cold storage: Fungi in the leading role. Microorganisms. 8: 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020185
Libudzisz, Z., K. Kowal and Z. Zakowska. 2008. Technical microbiology, Microorganisms in biotechnology, environmental protection and food production (Polish), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, t. II: 235-288.
Madrid-Guijarro, A., D. Garcia and H.V. Auken. 2009. Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. J. Small Bus. Manage., 47: 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x
Maria Rita, A.P., S.O. Vivian., C.P. Tatiana and H.P. Sandra. 2017. Physicochemical stability, antioxidant activity, and acceptance of beet and orange mixed juice during refrigerated storage. Beverages, 3: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages3030036
Mohd-Hanif, H.A., R. Shamsudin and N.M. Adzahan. 2016. Effects of UVC irradiation and thermal treatment on the physico-chemical properties and microbial reduction of clear and turbid tamarind juice. Int. Food Res. J., 23(Suppl): 107-112.
Mosqueda-Melgar, J., R.M. Raybaudi-Massilia and O. Martín-Belloso. 2012. Microbiological shelf life and sensory evaluation of fruit juices treated by high intensity electric fields and antimicrobials. Food Bioprod. Process., 90(2): 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2011.03.004
Nidhi, G.R., R. Singh, S. Siddiqui and M.K. Rana. 2007. Changes in chemical composition of ready-to-serve bael-guava blended beverage during storage. J. Food Sci. Technol. (Mysore), 45(4): 378-380.
Noci, F., J. Riener, M. Walking-Ribeiro, D.A. Cronin, D.J. Morgan and J.G. Lyng. 2008. Ultraviolet irradiation and pulsed electric fields (PEF) in a hurdle strategy for the preservation of fresh apple juice. J. Food Eng., 85: 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.07.011
Oranusi, U.S., W. Braide and H.O. Nezianya. 2012. Microbiological and chemical quality assessment of some commercially packed fruit juices sold in Nigeria. Greener J. Biol. Sci., 2(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJBS.2012.1.07301217
Padma, P.N., P. Sravani, P. Mishra, N. Sneha and K. Anuradha. 2017. Synergistic effect of multiple enzymes on apple juice clarification. Indian J. Sci. Technol., 10(10): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i10/107716
Pimentel, T.C., G.S. Madrona, S. Garcia and S.H. Prudencio. 2015. Probiotic viability, physicochemical characteristics and acceptability during refrigerated storage of clarified apple juice supplemented with Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei and oligofructose in different package type. LWT Food Sci. Technol., 63: 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.009
Reddy, M.S., A.S. Chauhan and S. Maloo. 2018. Impact of enzymatic treatment on physicochemical properties of various vegetable juices. Pharma Innov., 7(11): 318-323.
Romeiras, M.M., A. Vieira and D.N. Silva. 2016. Evolutionary and biogeographic insights on the macaronesian beta-patellifolia species (Amaranthaceae) from a time-scaled molecular phylogeny. PLoS One, 11(3): e0152456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152456
Salwa M.A., J.Y.H. Tang, I. Ishamri, W.M. Fadli, Y. Nurhayati., A. Asmaliza, Z.N. Asyikeen and A. Roslan. 2023. Microbiological and physicochemical analysis of Keropok lekor at three storage temperatures. J. Agrobiotechnol., 14(2): 83-92. https://doi.org/10.37231/jab.2023.14.2.355
Seema, R., 2015. Food spoilage: Microorganisms and their prevention. Asian J. Plant Sci. Res., 5(4): 47-56.
Seow, E.K., A.F.M. Al-Karkhi, M.K.M. Talib, A.M. Easa and C.L. Hoong. 2015. An investigation of potential fraud in commercial orange juice products in Malaysian market by cluster analysis and principal component analysis. Malays. J. Anal. Sci., 19(2): 377-387.
Shamsudin, R., N.M. Adzahan, Y.P. Yee and A. Mansor. 2014. Effect of repetitive ultraviolet irradiation on the physico-chemical properties and microbial stability of pineapple juice. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 23: 114 - 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2014.02.005
Shamsudin, R., A. Zulkifli and A.A.K. Zaman. 2020. Quality attributes of fresh pineapple- mango juice blend during storage. Int. Food Res. J., 27(1): 141-149.
Sharma, H.P., H. Patel and S. Sharma. 2014. Enzymatic extraction and clarification of juice from various fruits. A review. Trends Post-Harvest. Technol., 2(1): 1–14.
Shaw, P.E., 1992. Shelf life and aging of citrus juice, juice drinks and related soft drinks. In: J.B. Redd, P.E. Shaw Ir, C.M. Hendrix and D.L. Hendrix). Quality control manual for citrus processing, Florida, Auburndale: Ag science. pp. 173-199.
Sokolowska, B., M. Chotkiewicz, J. Niezgoda, A. Dekowska and B. Sokołowska. 2011. Evaluation of microbial contamination of commercially available unpasteurized, freshly squeezed fruit and vegetable juices. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych. 569: 219–228.
Stannard, C., 1997. Development and use of microbiological criteria for foods. Food Sci. Technol., 11(3): 156.
Stannard, C., C. Bell, M. Greenwood, J. Hooker, A. Kyriakides and R. Mills. 1997. Development and use of microbiological criteria for foods. Food Sci. Technol., 11: 137–176.
Torregrosa, F., C. Cortes, M.J. Esteve and A. Frigola. 2005. Effect of high-intensity pulsed electric fields processing and conventional heat treatment on orange-carrot juice carotenoids. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53(24): 9519-9525. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf051171w
Torres-Vitela, M.D.R., C.A. G´omez Aldapa, J.F. Cerna-Cortes, A. Villarruel-L´opez, E. Rangel-Varga and J. Castro-Rosas. 2013. Presence of indicator bacteria, diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli pathotypes and Salmonella in fresh carrot juice from Mexican restaurants. Lett Appl Microbiol., 56(3): 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12030
Tournas, V.H. and E. Katsoudas. 2005. Mould and yeast flora in fresh berries, grapes and citrus fruits. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 105(1): 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.05.002
Tournas, V.H., J. Heeres and L. Burgess. 2006. Moulds and yeasts in fruit salads and fruit juices. Food Microbiol., 23(7): 684-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2006.01.003
Tournas, V.H., 2005. Moulds and yeasts in fresh and minimally processed vegetables, and sprouts. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 99(1): 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.08.009
Ubeira-Iglesias, M., D. Wilches-Pérez, M. Cavia, S. Alonso-Torre and C. Carrillo. 2019. High hydrostatic pressure processing of beetroot juice: Effects on nutritional, sensory and microbiological quality. High Pressure Res., 39: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2019.1666842
Yamazaki, K., H. Teduka and H. Shinano. 1996. Isolation and identification of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris from acidic beverages. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 60(3): 543-545. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.60.543
Zierler, B., B. Siegmund and W. Pfannhauser. 2004. Determination of off-flavour compounds in apple juice by microorganisms using head space solid phase micro extraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta, 520: 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.03.084
Zainab, F.A.M. and L.H. Ho. 2021. Effect of Incubation time and temperature on the physical properties of beetroot juice clarification and Its quality as affected by enzyme treatments. Biosci. Res., 18(SI-2): 45-57.
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?