Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Effects of Sand and Clay Compositions on Growth and Biochemical Aspects of Hordeum vulgare (L.) and Soil Physico-Chemical Properties

SJA_38_5_181-192

Research Article

Effects of Sand and Clay Compositions on Growth and Biochemical Aspects of Hordeum vulgare (L.) and Soil Physico-Chemical Properties

Humaira Gul1*,Muhammad Junaid Yousaf1*, Fawad Ali2, Mamoona Rauf1, Farhad Ali2 and Iqthedar Ali3

1Department of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan; 2Institue of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Bacha Khan University Charsadda, Pakistan; 3Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-E-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.

Abstract | Crop productivity mainly depends on soil type, soil composition and texture particularly, the ratio of sand and clay. The current research was carried out to investigate the effect of different ratios of sand and clay composition on growth and biochemical aspects of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and variations in soil physical and chemical properties were tested. During the experiment, plants were grown in eleven sets of soil combinations texture wise with varying ratio of sand and clay along their chemical properties. Different growth parameters based on physiological functioning and biochemical aspects were observed for various physical and chemical properties of soil provided to plants for growth optimization.. Barley flourished only well in sandy soil. The number of leaves, branches, fruits, plant height, proteins, and chlorophylls were significantly (P<0.05) increased in sandy soil proportion whereas in soil analysis moisture, hygroscopic water, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), chlorides, organic matter were significantly (P<0.05) increased for the soily soil in same proportion that is of sandy soil. This reveals that Barley should be grown in sandy soil for its better growth and productivity. The least growth parameters were noted on soil with more clay retaining most of moisture and inhibiting growth due to soil pH.


Received | January 23, 2022; Accepted | May 16, 2022; Published | November 29, 2022

*Correspondence | Humaira Gul and Muhammad Junaid Yousaf, Department of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan; Email: gulhumaira@awkum.edu.pk, muhammadjunaid@awkum.edu.pk

Citation | Gul, H., M.J. Yousaf, F. Ali, M. Rauf, F. Ali and I. Ali. 2022. effects of sand and clay compositions on growth and biochemical aspects of Hordeum vulgare (L.) and soil physico-chemical properties. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 38(5): 181-192.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2022/38.5.181.192

Keywords | Soil physical properties, Soil texture, Clay soil, Sandy soil, Growth, H. vulgare

Copyright: 2022 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

Soil is the fundamental unit and supportive medium for plant roots anchorage, proliferation and source of moisture and nutrients. Soil texture and composition are vital for plant growth. Environmental changes and management practices can modify soiltexture and chemical propeerrties. Effective soil management can enhance crop productivity by maintaining good soil texture, oxygen taking quality, water holding capacity and balanced pH. Soil degradation is generally associated with multiple factors i.e., soil erosion, nutrient leeching, and imbalance combinations of various soil particles and proportions. All these contribute to soil imbalance pH associated with water mineral absorption and affecting growth and productivity of the crops (Chai et al., 2016). Similarly, the plants are also affected by the saline stress specially sodium chloride (Yousaf, 2022) produce imbalance in the pH.

The pores of soil inside the rhizosphere hold dampness that adheres to soil particles by surface pressure or may top off the pores in part or completely soaking with it and help to the supplements to dissolve the minerals in the water, essentially required for plant growth and development. The roots of most plants additionally require oxygen for respiration. Thus, porosity plays a key role in soil aeration and root respiration. Carminati et al. (2010) revealed the influence of mucilage on the water holding capacity of the soil immediately around the root, and its implications for hydraulic continuity around the root system was demonstrated by (Moradi et al., 2011). In compacted soils, the influence of plant-derived exudates has been highlighted to improve mechanical conditions for root penetration (Oleghe et al., 2017). A part of the soil is an aggregate of solid material, comprised of minerals and organic matter, and open spaces, called pores. By volume, most soils are approximately 50 percent solids and with 50 percentporocity . The mineral matter composes about 45 to 47 % of the total soil volume (Tóth et al., 2016).

The major components of soil are sand, silt, and clay, this distinction is built on particle size and their chemistry (Taiz and Zeiger, 2006). Clay is crystalline with a repeating unit of planes of oxygen with silicon and aluminum atoms holding oxygen atoms together by ionic bonds (Uddin, 2017). The USDA system has devised twelve major classes relative to different ratios of sand, silt, and clay with loam having equal ratios of all three components (Willaredt and Nehls, 2020). In Pakistan Western highlands have bare rocks without any soil cover, while in Indus plains the higher areas are the subject with sands and the lower basins with loam and intermediate might have silt and loam (Khan, 2000). The topographic variations affect the cultivation practices, therefore, it is necessary to optimize the soil management practices to enhance crop productivity cost-effectively.

Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) belongs to the genus Hordeum in the tribe Triticeae of the grass family, Poaceae. The Triticeae tribe is a temperate plant group containing several economically important bowls of cereal and forages (Riehl, 2019). The stems are erect and made up of hollow, cylindrical internodes, separated by the nodes, which bear the leaves (Cakmak, 2008). The ligule and auricles distinguish Hordeum vulgare from other cereals as they are smooth, enveloped the stem, and can be pigmented with anthocyanins. Barley Plants contains varying amounts of tocopherols and tocotrienols (49.9-67.6mg/kg) and vitamin E content (vitamin E equivalent; 15.7-20.1mg/kg) (Granda et al., 2018). The beta-glucan component of Hordeum vulgare is believed to slow gastric emptying time, prolong the feeling of fullness, and stabilize blood sugars. The cultivation of Barley in different geographic planes and soil structures is greatly affected by soil structure and compositions. As it has been studied from the literature that favorable soil structure, particularly sand and clay ratio and aggregate stability are major contributing factors for soil fertility, porosity, decreased erodibility, and higher crop productivity. Therefore, a study was carried out to evaluate the suitable soil composition, in terms of sand and clay ratio for the growth, biochemical aspects, and cultivation of Barley.

Materials and Methods

Growth experiment

This experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of different ratios of two types of soil present in District Mardan. The composition of two selected types of soil was: Type 1 (Sandy Soil) Contain, 77.4% Sand, 10.1% Silt, and 12.5% Clay component in it. Type 2 (Clay Soil) contain, 17.7% Sand, 14.1% Silt and 68.2% Clay component in it. The experiment was comprised of 44 pots which were divided into 11 sets each set had different ratio of sand and clay, such as i) 0% sand +100% Clay, ii) 10% sand +90% Clay, iii) 20% sand +80% Clay, iv) 30% sand +70% Clay, v) 40% sand +60% Clay, vi) 50% sand +50% Clay, vii) 60% sand +40%Clay, viii) 70% sand +30% Clay, ix) 80% sand +20% Clay, x) 90% sand +10% Clay, xi) 100% sand +0% Clay. Each pot was saturated with water and a seedling with three leaves stage was transplanted in each pot. The size of the pot was 10 cm in height and 13 cm in diameter from the top and 10 cm in diameter from the base. Plants were grown for four months in the netted greenhouse with temperature ranging from 8 °C to 22 °C with 65-70% humidity. During whole duration, the plants received six times rainfall on average 5.4 mm rainfall per hour. The plants were daily watered in the morning time in amount of 40-45 mL. The plants were growth in the month of November, 2020 and harvested in the month of Feburary, 2021 and short after the harvest, the measurements were taken. Plants were harvested and their growth parameters in terms of plant height, fresh and dry biomass were measured. The root length was measured in the average centimeters of twelve plants of the same treatment condition using scale. Similarly, the number of fruits/ plant, leaves/plant and branches/plants was determined by taking twelve plants of the same treatment condition and taken in average. The biochemical attributes were calculated by standard methods: chlorophyll and carotenoids (Maclachlan and Zalik, 1963), reducing sugar (Nelson, 1944), total carbohydrates (Fales, 1951), phenols (Malick and Singh, 1980), total soluble proteins electrolyte leakage (Lutts et al., 2004), relative water content (Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2001) and leaf water loss (Clarke and McCaig, 1982).

Soil analysis

Soil analysis was made according to the standard methods, soil moisture by the method of (Smith, 2000), water movement in soil by the method of (Amoozegar, 1986), Gravitational water loss was measured using gravimetric method with oven drying. The moist soil was taken weighted and then dried in oven at 100°C for 48 h and then reweighed. The hygroscopic water content was measured by taking 10 % soil from the pot, weighted it and then provided 60 to 80 % relative humidity in the plant growth chamber at 25 °C for 24 hours and measured the weight. The capillary water rise was measured using the formula 2T/rpg wherein T is the surface tension of the water raised in the column, r is the radius of the column, p is the density of the water and g is the moment of water in the column measured in per second. The pH test by the method of (McLean, 1983), electrical conductivity by the method of (Rhoades, 1983),

 

Table 1: Effects of different ratios of sand and clay in soil on soil moisture, hygroscopic water, gravitational water loss, capillary water, and water movement in the soil.

Treatment

Gravitational

Water Loss (ml)

Hygroscopic

water (ml)

Capillary

water (ml)

Moisture %

Water Movement

in Soil (cm/min)

100% Sand

 

85.593e

0.260a

14.146a

16.220bcd

18.366d

+0.611

+0.075

+0.654

+0.436

+1.625

90%Sand+10%Clay

 

84.023de

0.493a

15.483ab

5.093a

11.366bc

+0.074

+0.102

+0.177

+2.634

+0.883

80%Sand+20%Clay

 

83.183cde

0.406a

16.410ab

10.756abc

10.200b

+0.296

+0.108

+0.259

+2.183

+1.474

70%Sand+30%Clay

 

82.630cde

0.603a

16.770abc

9.880ab

13.866c

+0.706

+0.151

+0.747

+1.092

+0.696

60%Sand+40%Clay

 

82.630cde

0.553a

16.816abc

18.430cde

11.700bc

+0.765

+0.123

+0.69

+3.956

+0.300

50% Sand+50%Clay

 

76.753ab

2.013b

21.233c

17.073bcd

6.966a

+0.915

+0.282

+0.932

+1.313

+1.297

40% Sand+60%Clay

 

82.953cde

1.830b

15.216a

16.650bcd

7.166a

+1.854

+0.399

+1.639

+2.222

+0.284

30% Sand+70%Clay

 

79.606abcd

3.290c

16.903abc

20.180de

5.200a

+2.347

+0.32

+2.613

+3.117

+0.36

20% Sand+80%Clay

 

80.846bcd

1.366ab

17.786abc

25.196e

5.566a

+0.441

+0.15

+0.541

+2.747

+0.176

10% Sand+90%Clay

 

78.66abc

3.356c

17.983abc

22.026de

4.700a

+0.754

+0.777

+0.347

+1.569

+0.435

100% Clay

 

75.586a

4.453d

19.96bc

17.053bcd

4.400a

+2.944

+0.547

+2.772

+2.837

+0.757

LSD0.05

0.052

0.058

0.051

0.056

0.065

Probability Level

P<0.01

P<0.001

P<0.05

P<0.001

P<0.001

Means followed by different letters in the same column differ significantly at the 95% probability level according to New Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

 

Chloride, bicarbonates, soil gypsum by the method of (Richards, 1954) soil organic matter by the method of (Nelson, 1944). The experiment was set up in a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replicates. Collected data were analyzed statistically by using SPSS 14 to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the means compared by Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).

Results and Discussion

Physical Properties of Soil

Results presented in Table 1 showed some physical properties of different proportions of clay and sandy soil. The soil at a concentration of 20% sand showed a significant (P<0.001) increase in soil moisture. However, the soil moisture was increased further when the ratio of clay increased. The sole reason is that clay bears a net negative charge and thus shows electrostatic attraction for water molecules (Delville, 1993). In some other studies, water retention is affected by the texture of soil (Razzaghi et al., 2020) as some clay minerals like Montmorillonite, iron oxide, vermiculite, and quartz increases the moisture-retaining abilities of clays which further affect the special distribution of forest and grasslands (Riddle and Bateman, 2020). Water held in pore spaces is called hygroscopic water (Martin and Gonzales, 2017). More pores spaces occur in clay soils. The highest values of hygroscopic water were measured in 100% clay which is also statistically significant (P<0.001). The gravitational water loss is more prominent in 100% sand which is significant (P<0.01) as well with a general increase in sand proportion the gravitational water loss is prominent this is in agreement with work done by (Pardo et al., 2019). Soil with 50% sand exhibited significant (P<0.05) in capillary water as the pore space determines water movement in soil (Gharedaghloo et al., 2020). Clay has higher total pore space, but smaller-sized pores than sand (Pardo et al., 2019). The highest capillary water was recorded for soils when both clay and sand were coupled in equal proportion. Soil with 100% sand showed a significant (P<0.001) increase in water movement in the soil these values showed a decline when soils are added with clay and the least values were observed with 100% clays as they have negative charge smallest size of 0.002mm, while the size for sand is 0.05mm This smaller size of clay increases aggregate surface area and the negative charge holds attraction towards the water and both these factors decline water movement. (Pardo et al., 2019).

Chemical Properties of Soil

Results in Table 2 showed some chemical properties of different proportions of clay and sandy soil. There is approximately a linear increase in pH values for the increase in clay contents in the soil while significantly (P<0.001) higher values were observed for soils with 100% clay which agrees with the results of other researchers (Evenson et al., 1998). With the increase in clay contents, the cation exchange capacity of soil also increases, the significant (P<0.001) highest values were observed in 100% clays which agree with (Arthur et al., 2020). Lower values of chlorides were seen from soils with high ratios of sand. These results agree with (Domeignoz-Horta et al., 2020). In some studies, soil chloride profile is used to estimate moisture (Huang et al., 2017) this water might be present physically but physiologically absent as chloride lowers soil water potential (Wang et al., 2020). The soil sample each with a different percentage of sand and clay was checked for bicarbonate ions, the soil with 70% sand exhibited a significant (P<0.001) increase in its values. Three soil samples (from 100% sand to 70% sand) exhibited relatively increased values for bicarbonate ions than all other samples. Also, all samples were analyzed for carbonates but all readings were recorded negative. The soil with 40% sand exhibited significant (P<0.001) highest values of gypsum, with the addition of clay the values of gypsum increase which agree with (Latifi et al., 2018). Soil containing 20% of sand exhibited a significant increase (P<0.001) values of soil organic matter and percentage organic carbon. In general terms, more enhanced values were found in soils with comparatively high ratios of clay to sand. These results are in line with (Follett et al., 2020; Babaoglu and Simms, 2020). Organic matter stays for a longer time in clayey soils (Koegel-Knabner and Rumpel, 2018).

Growth Attributes

Figures 1 and 2 showed different growth parameters of the Hordeum vulgare plant grown in different proportions of clay and sandy soil. The plants that were grown in soil with 100% sand exhibited a significant (P<0.001) increase in plant height, and with the increase in clay content in the soil, decreased plant height was observed. Plants that were grown in soil with 40% sand showed a significantly (P<0.001) increase in root length, it is more enhanced in sandy soils and those soils with 50-70% clays, on the other side more clays inhibits root growth due to compaction (Abbas et al., 2018), reduced infiltration and accumulation of toxic

 

Table 2: Effects of different ratios of sand and clay in soil on pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil chlorides, bicarbonates, gypsum, percentage of organic matter, and percentage of organic carbon.

Treatment

CEC

pH

Bicarbonates

Chlorides

Gypsum

Organic matter

Organic Carbon

 

dS/cm

meq/l

meq/l

meq/l

(%)

(%)

100% Sand

 

0.966a

8.630ab

6.833fg

4.700d

8.889ab

5.673a

3.290a

+0.033

+0.11

+0.166

+0.399

+0.203

+0.117

+0.068

90%Sand+10%Clay

 

1.666b

8.660ab

4.933de

1.823bc

7.648a

15.613c

9.056c

+0.033

+0.034

+0.24

+0.136

+0.183

+0.626

+0.363

80%Sand+20%Clay

 

2.200c

8.790bcd

5.866ef

1.300ab

10.412bc

14.804c

8.587c

+0.057

+0.005

+0.371

+0.45

+0.146

+0.443

+0.256

70%Sand+30%Clay

 

2.266c

8.636ab

7.066g

1.000a

10.887bc

8.427ab

4.888ab

+0.033

+0.023

+0.176

+0.152

+0.338

+1.16

+0.673

60%Sand+40%Clay

 

2.733d

8.733bc

3.800abc

1.166ab

13.299cd

12.366bc

7.173bc

+0.033

+0.012

+0.503

+0.145

+0.626

+2.397

+1.390

50%Sand+50%Clay

 

3.200e

8.913cde

4.800cd

1.566abc

14.889de

10.584abc

6.139abc

+0.0031

+0.008

+0.2

+0.176

+0.639

+0.162

+0.094

40%Sand+60%Clay

 

3.266e

8.493a

3.800abc

1.400ab

51.215g

12.753bc

7.397bc

+0.066

+0.166

+0.305

+0.152

+2.834

+2.457

+1.425

30%Sand+70%Clay

 

3.566f

8.953de

3.666ab

1.866bc

15.918e

29.106d

16.883d

+0.033

+0.02

+0.466

+0.12

+0.599

+3.938

+2.284

20%Sand+80%Clay

 

3.866g

9.076e

2.733a

1.933bc

46.706h

52.013e

30.170d

+0.033

+0.012

+0.569

+0.088

+1.097

+1.32

+0.765

10%Sand+90%Clay

 

4.133h

9.076e

4.133bcd

2.200c

11.202bc

14.886c

8.634c

+0.033

+0.012

+0.133

+0.173

+1.305

+1.353

+0.784

100% Clay

 

4.533i

9.300f

3.333ab

1.433ab

20.301f

6.176a

3.582a

+0.066

+0.011

+0.333

+0.24

+0.684

+0.260

+0.151

LSD0.05

0.281

0.065

0.061

0.053

0.104

0.078

0.077

Probability Level

P<0.001

P<0.001

P<0.001

P<0.001

P<0.001

P<0.001

P<0.001

Means followed by different letters in the same column differ significantly at the 95% probability level according to New Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

 

concentration of carbon dioxide (Mohsin et al., 2019). Whereas the soils with high sand contents have high gypsum contents too, in other plants it may reduce root length but not in the case of Hordeum vulgare Reduced root length exhibits reduced shoots to clearing the feed-forward theory . A significant (P<0.001) increase in the number of leaves was found for plants grown in soil with 100% sand. The number of leaves per plant bears an inverse relationship with clay contents in soil. Such clayey soils were attributed to high ratios of chloride contents (Table 2) which makes the water unavailable to plants (leading to consequences like low altering carbon dioxide conductance, abnormal leaf anatomy lower photosynthetic rate, programmed stomatal closure and reduced photosynthetic enzyme activity (Jin et al., 2020) which results in a reduced number of leaves and their activity. The plants were harvested in soil containing 100% sand exhibited a significant (P<0.001) increase in the number of branches per plant. With increasing clay contents in the soil, the number of branches was declined. This adaptation of Hordeum vulgare is dependent on extreme edaphic conditions of soil that select biota for the region with characteristically endemism (Begum, 2017). In our results, the plants that were grown in soil containing 100% sand showed a significant (P<0.001) increase in the number of ears (fruit) per plant, this yield was more enhanced in soils with high ratios of sand only while clay soils had been stressed. Hordeum vulgare being susceptible to waterlogged conditions expressed reduced yields when grown in clayey soils. In some studies, it showed about 80% reduction. In our results, the plants that were cultured in soil containing 100% sand showed a significant (P<0.001) increase in fresh and dry biomass. This result meets with the findings of

 

(Mohsin et al., 2019) where they got increased fresh and dry biomass for plants grown in sandy soil.

Biochemical Analysis

The plants harvested in soil with 70% sand exhibited a significant (P<0.05) increase in total chlorophylls, chlorophyll-a, and chlorophyll-b (Table 3). The soil in which the ratio of sand and clay (7: 3) or any ratio that is in between these reveals higher contents of chlorophylls. These results are in agreement with Jolly and Kumar (2012), while the ratio of chlorophyll a and b was more enhanced in plants harvested in soils with 20% sand (Jolly et al., 2012). Carotenoids acts as a defense line against oxidative damage developed by drought stress these conclude that higher contents of carotenoids show plant resistance to these stresses. In our results, those plants that were harvested in soils with 40% sand showed a significant (P<0.001)

 

increase in the number of carotenoids (Table 3), these plants exhibiting higher contents of carotenoids are met with poor growth and the soils are found with higher gypsum contents lowering the growth in all other plants except Hordeum vulgare. It is tolerant to drought stresses or oxidative damages caused by drought stresses as Hordeum vulgare bears the ability to develop such higher contents of carotenoids. A test for total soluble proteins was conducted, the significant (P<0.001) highest protein contents were recorded for plants harvested in soil containing 70% sand. In general higher values were recorded for all those plants which were harvested in soil with more than 60% of sand (Table 4). This sorted out that there are some stresses in clayey soils (more than 50% clay) that inhibit the synthesis of globular proteins. The plants were tested for phenolic compounds, significant (P<0.001) increase values were recorded for plants harvested in soils with 60% sand (Table 3). In general terms, the greater values were observed for plants in

 

Table 3: Effects of different ratios of sand and clay in soil on Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, a/b, proteins, and phenol concentration of Hordeum vulgare.

Treatment

Chlorophyll-a

Chlorophyll-b

Total Chlorophyll

a/b Ratio

Carotenoids

Total Protein

Total Phenols

 

(mg/gm fr.wt)

(mg/gm fr.wt)

(mg/gm fr.wt)

(mg/gm fr.wt)

(mg/gm dry.wt)

(mg/gm dry.wt)

100% Sand

 

0.739abc

0.178ab

0.918abcd

4.409a

0.337b

0.413d

183.333a

+0.183

+0.061

+0.243

+0.479

+0.087

+0.014

+60.092

90%Sand+10% Clay

 

0.468a

0.126ab

0.595ab

4.848a

0.265ab

0.410d

766.666bc

+0.156

+0.068

+0.219

+1.088

+0.035

+0.023

+296.273

80%Sand+20% Clay

 

0.448a

0.096a

0.545a

4.688a

0.189a

0.393d

433.333ab

+0.088

+0.014

+0.099

+0.607

+0.052

+0.006

+88.191

70%Sand+30%

1.015c

0.212b

1.228d

4.804a

0.526cd

0.426d

700.000bc

+0.044

+0.013

+0.049

+0.346

+0.018

+0.013

+152.752

60%Sand+40% Clay

 

0.862bc

0.164ab

1.026bcd

5.332a

0.407bcd

0.213b

1033.333c

+0.047

+0.016

+0.056

+0.504

+0.02

+0.003

+120.185

50% Sand+50%Clay

 

0.697abc

0.117ab

0.814abcd

5.941a

0.352b

0.193ab

733.333bc

+0.084

+0.015

+0.099

+0.158

+0.05

+0.006

+185.592

40% Sand+60%Clay

 

0.969bc

0.177ab

1.146cd

5.474a

0.537d

0.203b

633.333bc

+0.085

+0.014

+0.099

+0.157

+0.007

+0.023

+33.333

30% Sand+70%Clay

 

0.675abc

0.095a

0.771abc

7.183a

0.406bcd

0.256c

566.666ab

+0.106

+0.019

+0.126

+0.371

+0.062

+0.006

+88.191

20% Sand+80%Clay

 

0.781abc

0.091a

0.873abcd

60.609a

0.383bc

0.220bc

500.000ab

+0.085

+0.045

+0.123

+54.486

+0.031

+0.01

+57.735

10% Sand+90%Clay

 

0.749abc

0.173ab

0.922abcd

4.318a

0.373b

0.230bc

533.333ab

+0.101

+0.006

+0.105

+0.507

+0.044

+0.005

+33.333

100% Clay

 

0.629ab

0.113ab

0.742abc

5.817a

0.342b

0.156a

433.333ab

+0.048

+0.02

+0.069

+0.767

+0.0338

+0.006

+88.191

LSD0.05

0.058

0.131

0.09

1

0.076

0.054

0.066

Probability Level

P<0.05

P<0.05

P<0.05

NS

P<0.001

P<0.001

P<0.05

Means followed by different letters in the same column differ significantly at the 95% probability level according to New Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

 

soil with 70% sand to 40% sand. There are reports for the concentration of soil phenols (produced by plants) dependent on plant species and greater in sandy than loamy soils, (Pereira, 2021)this refers that phenol is synthesized by plants depending on soil type. The concentration of total carbohydrates and non-reducing sugar is greater in plants that were harvested in clayey soils and significant (P<0.001) increase values were recorded (total and non-reducing sugars) for plants harvested in 30% sand (Table 4). This group of plants exhibit lower growth in all other aspects and so the reason could be carbohydrate accumulation with no immediate use (Jolly et al., 2012). The values for reducing sugars are no more different than other classes of sugars, the significant (P<0.05) increase values were recorded for 20% sand, another factor that comes here in regard is the higher contents of chlorides in clayey soils (Table 4) results in accumulation of reducing sugars both in roots and leaves. The salinity interferes with K+ homeostasis triggering accelerated cell death and reducing growth, but such high contents of reducing sugars are a symptom that Hordeum vulgare is a salinity tolerant plant and could produce such high amounts of reducing sugars. Severe drought stresses decrease leaf Relative Water Content (Gupta and Huang, 2014) this meets our results where the lowest values were observed in plants grown on saline soils (with high clay ratios). On the other side, sandy soils offer less drought stress, and significant (P<0.05) increase values of RWC were observed for plants harvested in soils with 100% sand (Table 4). The increased values of leaf water loss were recorded for Hordeum vulgare plants harvested in soils with 80% sand and next higher for soil with 90% sand

 

Table 4: Effect of different ratios of sand and clay in soil on reducing, non-reducing sugars, total carbohydrates, relative water content (RWC), Leaf water loss (LWL), and electrolyte leakage (EL) of Hordeum vulgare (L).

Treatment

Reducing Sugars

Non Reducing Sugars

Total Carbohydrates

RWC

LWL

EL

(mg/gm fr.wt)

(mg/gm fr.wt)

(mg/gm dry.wt)

%

%

%

100% Sand

0.336abc

0.650ab

0.986ab

94.960b

14.194a

64.305a

 

+0.012

+0.03

+0.035

+1.099

+5.149

+45.146

90%Sand+10%Clay

0.303a

1.083c

1.386cd

84.080b

20.868a

80.476a

 

+0.013

+0.066

+0.074

+2.658

+9.836

+23.933

80%Sand+20%Clay

0.370abcd

0.943c

1.313cd

86.236b

22.655a

61.586a

 

+0.03

+0.083

+0.053

+3.244

+3.431

+40.646

70%Sand+30%Clay

0.310ab

0.863bc

1.173bc

94.866b

12.422a

59.137a

 

+0.01

+0.171

+0.177

+0.373

+1.558

+49.648

60%Sand+40%Clay

0.383bcd

0.896bc

1.280cd

93.076b

13.042a

87.245a

 

+0.031

+0.016

+0.02

+3.685

+5.982

+19.599

50%Sand+50%Clay

0.356abcd

0.850bc

1.206bc

89.436b

11.748a

40.838a

 

+0.029

+0.112

+0.103

+3.932

+4.569

+22.21

40%Sand+60%Clay

0.400cd

0.846bc

1.246c

83.306b

10.833a

51.242a

 

+0.023

+0.024

+0.006

+1.709

+1.782

+8.704

30%Sand+70%Clay

0.390bcd

1.383d

1.773e

91.293b

10.583a

79.386a

 

+0.005

+0.08

+0.076

+1.206

+4.605

+36.095

20%Sand+80%Clay

0.426d

1.060c

1.486d

43.606a

12.521a

51.253a

 

+0.044

+0.037

+0.006

+22.32

+0.967

+33.126

10%Sand+90%Clay

0.333abc

0.880bc

1.213bc

90.633b

10.321a

26.790a

 

+0.023

+0.009

+0.013

+1.743

+2.312

+9.241

100% Clay

0.386bcd

0.433a

0.820a

72.040b

15.627a

25.656a

 

+0.006

+0.006

0.000

+10.501

+5.319

+0.003

LSD0.05

0.101

0.053

0.054

0.086

0.132

0.23

Probability Level

P<0.05

P<0.001

P<0.001

P<0.05

NS

NS

Means followed by different letters in the same column differ significantly at the 95% probability level according to New Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

 

(Table 4) rest of the values stayed in a range that no difference in their population means was observed (Naveed et al., 2014). Electrolyte leakage refers to membrane permeability increased by severe drought stress in this regard in our results the lower values were recorded for plants harvested in soils with high ratios of clayey soils.

Conclusions and Recommendations

The present research was conducted to investigate soil proportions and composition of different growth attributes of the Hordeum vulgarecrop . It was observed that soil physical and chemical properties led to changes in different growth parameters of Barley and maximum growth was observed in terms of number of leaves, branches, fruits, plant height, proteins, because chlorophylls contents were significantly (P<0.05) increased in proportion towards sandy soils. However, the soil analysis moisture, hygroscopic water, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), chlorides, organic matter were found significantly (P<0.05) increased in other soil combinations. Therefore, the present study recommends that Hordeum vulgare should be grown in sandy soil proportion for its better growth and productivity as compared to other proportions which are less favorable for its growth.

Novelty Statement

The current research was conducted out to analyze the effect of different ratios of sand and clay composition on the biochemical, physiological and morphological aspects of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in relation with the variations in soil physical and chemical properties.

Author’s Contribution

Humaira Gul and Rabia Khan: Conducted the research and drafted the initial manuscript.

Mamoona Rauf: Conducted Statistical analyses

Muhammad Junaid Yousaf and Fawad Ali: Conducted the conceptualization, validation of the study and construction of figures.

Alia Gul and Farhad Ali: Critically reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Abbas, T., M. Rizwan, S. Ali, M. Adrees, A. Mahmood, M. Zia-Ur-Rehman, M. Ibrahim, M. Arshad and M.F. Qayyum. 2018. Biochar application increased the growth and yield and reduced cadmium in drought stressed wheat grown in an aged contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 148: 825-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.063

Aiken, R. and A. Smucker. 1996. Root system regulation of whole plant growth. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 34(1): 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.325

Amoozegar, A. and Warrick, A.W. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils: field methods. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods5, pp.735-770. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c29

Anderson, A.B. 1981. White-sand vegetation of Brazilian Amazonia. Biotropica, 199-210. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388125

Arthur, E., M. Tuller, P. Moldrup and L.W. De Jonge. 2020. Clay content and mineralogy, organic carbon and cation exchange capacity affect water vapour sorption hysteresis of soil. Eu. J. Soil Sci., 71(2): 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12853

Babaoglu, Y. and P. Simms. 2020. Improving Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation for Soft Clayey Soils, Sediments, or Tailings Using Predictors Measured at High-Void Ratio. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 146(10): 06020016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002344

Begum, F. 2017. Biology and molecular characterisation of the root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus curvicauda. Murdoch University.

Bernasconi, S.M., I.A. Müller, K.D. Bergmann, S.F. Breitenbach, A. Fernandez, D.A. Hodell, M. Jaggi, A.N. Meckler, I. Millan and M. Ziegler. 2018. Reducing uncertainties in carbonate clumped isotope analysis through consistent carbonate-based standardization. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 19(9): 2895-2914. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GC007385

Cakmak, I. 2008. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: agronomic or genetic biofortification?. Plant Soil, 302(1):1-17.

Carminati, A., Moradi, A.B., Vetterlein, D., Vontobel, P., Lehmann, E., Weller, U. and Oswald, S.E. 2010. Dynamics of soil water content in the rhizospherePlant Soil332: 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0283-8

Clarke, J.M. and T.N. Mccaig. 1982. Evaluation of Techniques for Screening for Drought Resistance in Wheat 1. Crop Sci., 22(3): 503-506. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200030015x

Chai, Q., Gan, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, H.L., Waskom, R.M., Niu, Y. and Siddique, K.H. 2016. Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review. Agron. Sustain. Develop., 36(1): 1-21.

Delville, A. 1993. Structure and properties of confined liquids: a molecular model of the clay-water interface. J. Phy. Chem., 97(38): 9703-9712. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100140a029

Domeignoz-Horta, L.A., G. Pold, X.J.A. Liu, S.D. Frey, J.M. Melillo and K.M. Deangelis. 2020. Microbial diversity drives carbon use efficiency in a model soil. Nat. Commun., 11(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17502-z

Evenson, R.E., C. Pray and M.W. Rosegrant 1998. Agricultural research and productivity growth in India, Intl Food Policy Res Inst.

Fales, F.W. 1951. The assimilation and degradation of carbohydrates by yeast cells. J. Biol. Chem., 193(1): 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52433-4

Follett, R., C. Stewart, J. Bradford, E. Pruessner, P.L. Sims and M. Vigil. 2020. Long-term pasture management impacts on eolian sand soils in the southern mixed-grass prairie. Quaternary International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.07.019

Garcia-Mata, C. and L. Lamattina. 2001. Nitric oxide induces stomatal closure and enhances the adaptive plant responses against drought stress. Plant Physiol., 126(3): 1196-1204. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.3.1196

Gharedaghloo, B., S.J. Berg and E.A. Sudicky. 2020. Water freezing characteristics in granular soils: Insights from pore-scale simulations. Adv. Water Resour., 143: 103681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103681

Granda, L., A. Rosero, K. Benešová, H. Pluháčková, J. Neuwirthová and R. Cerkal. 2018. Content of selected vitamins and antioxidants in colored and nonpigmented varieties of Quinoa, Barley, and Wheat Grains. J. Food Sci., 83(10): 2439-2447. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14334

Gupta, B. and B. Huang. 2014. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int. J. Genom., https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/701596

Huang, T., Z. Pang, J. Liu, L. Yin and W.M. Edmunds. 2017. Groundwater recharge in an arid grassland as indicated by soil chloride profile and multiple tracers. Hydrol. Process., 31(5): 1047-1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11089

Hussain, F. 1989. Field and laboratory manual of plant ecology, National Academy of Higher Education, University Grants Commission.

Jin, D., X. Wang, Y. Xu, H. Gui, H. Zhang, Q. Dong, R. K. Sikder, G. Yang and M. Song. 2020. Chemical Defoliant Promotes Leaf Abscission by Altering ROS Metabolism and Photosynthetic Efficiency in Gossypium hirsutum. Int. J. Mole. Sci., 21(8): 2738. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082738

Jolly, M., A.S. Pickard, J.A. Block, R.B. Kumar, R.A. Mikolaitis, C.T. Wilke, R.A. Rodby, L. Fogg, W. Sequeira and T.O. Utset. 2012. Disease-specific patient reported outcome tools for systemic lupus erythematosus. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. Elsevier, 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.12.005

Kaya, C., N.A. Akram and M. Ashraf. 2019. Influence of exogenously applied nitric oxide on strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa) plants grown under iron deficiency and/or saline stress. Physiol. Plant., 165(2): 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12818

Khadem, S.A., Galavi, M., Ramrodi, M., Mousavi, S.R., Rousta, M.J. and Rezvani-Moghadam, P. 2010. Effect of animal manure and superabsorbent polymer on corn leaf relative water content, cell membrane stability and leaf chlorophyll content under dry condition. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 4(8): 642-647.

Khan, M. 2000. The arid zone of west Pakistan: Geographical aspects of aridity in WEST Pakistan. Doctoral thesis. Durham University, UK.

Koegel-Knabner, I. and C. Rumpel 2018. Advances in molecular approaches for understanding soil organic matter composition, origin, and turnover: a historical overview. Adv. Agron., Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2018.01.003

Latifi, N., F. Vahedifard, S. Siddiqua and S. Horpibulsuk. 2018. Solidification–stabilization of heavy metal–contaminated clays using gypsum: Multiscale assessment. Int. J. Geomech., 18(11): 04018150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001283

Lutts, S., M. Almansouri and J.M. Kinet. 2004. Salinity and water stress have contrasting effects on the relationship between growth and cell viability during and after stress exposure in durum wheat callus. Plant Sci., 167(1): 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.02.014

Maclachlan, S. and S. Zalik. 1963. Plastid structure, chlorophyll concentration, and free amino acid composition of a chlorophyll mutant of Barley. Canadian J. Bot., 41(7): 1053-1062. https://doi.org/10.1139/b63-088

Malick, C. and M. Singh. 1980. Plant Enzymology and Histo Enzymology Kalyari. Publishers New Delhi. 286.

Martin, E.C. and J. Gonzales 2017. Arizona Master Gardener Manual, University of Arizona.

Mclean, E. 1983. Soil pH and lime requirement. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties. 9: 199-224. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c12

Mohsin, M., S. Kuittinen, M.M.A. Salam, S. Peräniemi, S. Laine, P. Pulkkinen, E. Kaipiainen, J. Vepsäläinen and A. Pappinen. 2019. Chelate-assisted phytoextraction: Growth and ecophysiological responses by Salix schwerinii EL Wolf grown in artificially polluted soils. J. Geochem. Exp., 205: 106335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.106335

Moradi, A.B., Carminati, A., Vetterlein, D., Vontobel, P., Lehmann, E., Weller, U. and Oswald, S.E. 2011. Three-dimensional visualization and quantification of water content in the rhizosphereNew Phytol.192: 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03826.x

Naveed, M., B. Mitter, T.G. Reichenauer, K. Wieczorek and A. Sessitsch. 2014. Increased drought stress resilience of maize through endophytic colonization by Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN and Enterobacter sp. FD17. Environ. Exp. Bot., 97: 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.014

Nelson, N. 1944. A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem., 153(2): 375-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71980-7

Oleghe, E., Naveed, M., Baggs, E.M., and Hallett, P.D. 2017. Plant exudates improve the mechanical conditions for root penetration through compacted soilsPlant and Soil421: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3424-5

Pardo, G., A. Sarmah and R. Orense. 2019. Mechanism of improvement of biochar on shear strength and liquefaction resistance of sand. Géotechnique, 69(6): 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.040

Razzaghi, F., P.B. Obour and E. Arthur. 2020. Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geoderma. 361: 114055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114055

Pereira, I. 2021. Preclinical developments of natural-occurring halloysite clay nanotubes in cancer therapeutics. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 291: 102406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102406

Rhoades, J. 1983. Soluble salts. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 9: 167-179. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c10

Richards, L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils, LWW. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195408000-00012

Riddle, S.B. and H.L. Bateman. 2020. Habitat and soil associations of a fossorial toad in a Sonoran Desert riparian forest. J. Arid Environ., 181: 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104239

Riehl, S. 2019. Barley in Archaeology and Early History. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.219

Smith, K.A. 2000. Soil and environmental analysis: physical methods, revised, and expanded, CRC Press.

Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 2006. Stress physiology. Plant physiology. 4.

Tóth, G., Hermann, T., Da Silva, M.R. and Montanarella, L.J.E.I. 2016. Heavy metals in agricultural soils of the European Union with implications for food safety. Environ. Int., 88: 299-309.

Uddin, M.K. 2017. A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade. Chem. Eng. J., 308: 438-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.029

Wang, H., Z. Yu, Y. Shi and Y. Zhang. 2020. Effects of tillage practices on grain yield formation of wheat and the physiological mechanism in rainfed areas. Soil Till. Res., 202: 104675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104675

Willaredt, M. and T. Nehls. 2020. Investigation of water retention functions of artificial soil-like substrates for a range of mixing ratios of two components. J. Soils Sediments, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02727-8

Yousaf, M.J., Ali, F. and Ali, F. 2022. Effect of Sodium Chloride Stress on the Adaptation of Zea mays Seedlings at the Expense of Growth. Sarhad J. Agric., 38(1): 249-259. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2022/38.1.249.259

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Sarhad Journal of Agriculture

September

Vol.40, Iss. 3, Pages 680-1101

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe