Drought Tolerance Screening in Thirty Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes
Ajmalud Din1*, Munir Ahmad2, Fahad Masoud Watto2, Sheraz Ahmed1, Imtiaz Ali1 and Muhammad Kausar Nawaz Shah2
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, 25130, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; 2Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, 46300, Pakistan.
ajmalpbg@aup.edu.pk
Figure 1
Mean performance of 30 wheat varieties for chlorophyll content.
Figure 2
Mean performance of 30 wheat varieties for canopy temperature.
Figure 3
Mean performance of 30 wheat varieties for proline content.
Figure 4
Mean values of 30 wheat varieties for osmotic potential.
Figure 5
Mean values of 30 wheat varieties for relative water content.
Figure 6
Mean performance of 30 wheat varieties for excised leaf water retention.
Figure 7
Mean performance of 30 wheat varieties for cell membrane stability.
Figure 8
Mean performance of 30 wheat varieties for osmotic adjustment