Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN
Latest Blogs: https://researcherslinks.com/en/kahoot-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/blooket-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/comcast-login/ https://researcherslinks.com/en/gimkit-login/

Current Understanding and Future Perspective of Bats Antiviral Innate Immunity

Current Understanding and Future Perspective of Bats Antiviral Innate Immunity

King Hei Ip

Division of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, United Kingdom

 
*Correspondence | King Hei Ip, Division of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, United Kingdom; Email: kingston_ip@yahoo.com

Figure 1:

Structure of a virus. From: Taylor, 2010. CC0 1.0 Universal.

Figure 2:

Canonical IFN signalling cascade.

Figure 3:

Antiviral effector ISGs in bats. Adapted from: Zhang and Irving, 2023.

Figure 4:
The comparison of human and bat STING and inflammasome activities within a cell. The lost PYHIN gene family DNA sensor in bats leads to a dampened NLRP3-mediated inflammasome response, which also impacts the action of STING, which in bats lacks a serine residue, reducing its functionality (Clayton and Munir, 2020). 

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

October

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56, Iss. 5, pp. 2001-2500

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe