Short Communication · Volume 53, Issue 5, 19 August 2021 · Open Access
Growth Model of Body Weight and Body Size Traits of Alashan Bactrian Camel (Camelus bactrianus)
· · · · · · ·
Affiliations & Notes ⌄
- 1College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China 2Institute of Animal, Alxa of Inner Mongolia, Bayanhaote 750306, China 3School of Life Sciences, Henan Universiry, Kaifeng 475000, China , * Corresponding author: byezi@163.com
Article Info ⌄
- Journal:
- Pakistan Journal of Zoology
- Published:
- 19 August 2021

From the article
- As it is depicted in the Figure 1, the fitting results of body weight, body length, body height, chest circumference and tube circumference were the worst under logistic model.
- The fitting effect of cubic model (R2 = 0.967), and logarithmic model was considerable (R2 = 0.912) whereas the fitting effect of other models is not ideal.
- The cubic model and S model of the body weight of Alashan Bactrian camel had the best fitting effect (R2 = 0.979, 0.974).
- The fitting effect of quadratic model and logarithmic model appeared better (R2 = 0.950, 0.951) among all, and logistic model showed the worst corelation (R2 = 0.682).
Selected from the article's own text.
Abstract
Materials and methods
The data on the male Bacterian camels was mainly acquired from the animal husbandry research of Alxa League from Alxa Left Banner in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. The measurement of traits invovles (i) body weight: The live weight taken with the weighbridge before the camel drunk water; (ii) body height was measured from the base of the front to the rear edge of camel peak to the ground; (iii) body length was attributed to the distance from shoulder to hip (measured with a measuring stick); (iv) chest circumference include a circle around the center of the horny pad at the bottom of the chest from the base of the posterior edge of the front peak (measured with a tape measure) and (v) tube circumference accounted for the upper third part of the tube of the left forelimb, which was formed in a circle (measured with a tape measure). The SPSS software was used to analyze the curve regression of body weight and body size characters to age of Alashan Bactrian camel. The best regression model was selected according to the fitting degree.
Table I. Growth curve fitting results of weight and body size characters of Alashan Bactrian Camel.
| Traits | Model | Equation | b0 | b1 | b2 | b3 | R2 | P | F |
| Body height | Logarithmic | Y=b0+b1 (InX) o+b1×(lnX) | 19.796 | 128.998 | 0.692 | 0.000 | 29.229 | ||
| Quadratic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2 | 114.564 | 13.471 | -0.684 | 0.768 | 0.000 | 19.904 | ||
| Cubic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2+ b3X3 | 88.753 | 30.193 | -3.214 | 0.105 | 0.900 | 0.000 | 32.912 | |
| S | Y=e(b0+b1/X) | 5.219 | -0.520 | 0.937 | 0.000 | 194.159 | |||
| Logistic | Y=1/(1/u+b0(b1X)) | 0.007 | 0.983 | 0.352 | 0.020 | 7.075 | |||
| Body length | Logarithmic | Y=b0+b1 (InX) o+b1×(lnX) | 108.739 | 22.642 | 0.856 | 0.000 | 77.240 | ||
| Quadratic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2 | 95.929 | 13.537 | -0.646 | 0.897 | 0.000 | 52.219 | ||
| Cubic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2+ b3X3 | 80.396 | 23.601 | -2.169 | 0.063 | 0.942 | 0.000 | 59.468 | |
| S | Y=e(b0+b1/X) | 5.140 | -0.601 | 0.982 | 0.000 | 706.711 | |||
| Logistic | Y=1/(1/u+b0(b1X)) | 0.008 | 0.976 | 0.511 | 0.003 | 13.600 | |||
| Chest circumference | Logarithmic | Y=b0+b1 (InX) o+b1×(l nX) | 146.675 | 33.982 | 0.912 | 0.000 | 134.323 | ||
| Quadratic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2 | 134.192 | 17.509 | -0.779 | 0.889 | 0.000 | 47.904 | ||
| Cubic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2+ b3X3 | 104.462 | 36.771 | -3.694 | 0.121 | 0.967 | 0.000 | 106.176 | |
| S | Y=e(b0+b1/X) | 5.473 | -0.615 | 0.972 | 0.000 | 492.503 | |||
| Logistic | Y=1/(1/u+b0(b1X)) | 0.006 | 0.974 | 0.603 | 0.001 | 19.776 | |||
| Body weight | Logarithmic | Y=b0+b1 (InX) o+b1×(l nX) | 237.515 | 152.304 | 0.951 | 0.000 | 251.465 | ||
| Quadratic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2 | 26.204 | 7.536 | 0.458 | 0.950 | 0.000 | 114.660 | ||
| Cubic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2+ b3X3 | 103.083 | 128.340 | -11.138 | 0.325 | 0.979 | 0.000 | 172.543 | |
| S | Y=e(b0+b1/X) | 6.491 | -1.228 | 0.974 | 0.000 | 483.325 | |||
| Logistic | Y=1/(1/u+b0(b1X)) | 0.003 | 0.947 | 0.682 | 0.000 | 21.993 | |||
| Tube circumference | Logarithmic | Y=b0+b1 (InX) o+b1×(l nX) | 12.691 | 2.650 | 0.685 | 0.000 | 28.211 | ||
| Quadratic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2 | 11.027 | 1.691 | -0.084 | 0.718 | 0.001 | 15.281 | ||
| Cubic | Y=b0+b1X+ b2X2+ b3X3 | 7.624 | 3.896 | -0.418 | 0.014 | 0.844 | 0.000 | 19.856 | |
| S | Y=e(b0+b1/X) | 3.006 | -0.674 | 0.914 | 0.000 | 138.536 | |||
| Logistic | Y=1/(1/u+b0(b1X)) | 0.069 | 0.977 | 0.367 | 0.170 | 7.538 |
Results and discussion
Figure 1 show the fitting results of weight and body size characters of Alashan Bactrian camel under five growth models (Logarithmic, Quadratic, Cubic, S, and logistic). As it is depicted in the Figure 1, the fitting results of body weight, body length, body height, chest circumference and tube circumference were the worst under logistic model.
As outlined in the Table I, the fitting effect of the S growth model of Alashan Bactrian camel body height was the best (R2 = 0.937), and the S growth model was Y=e(5.219-0.520/X), followed by the cubic model with better fitting effect (R2 = 0.900). However, the fitting effect of other models was unsuitable and thus was not considered. The fit effect of S growth model of Alashan Bactrian camel body length was the best (R2 = 0.982), the S growth model was Y=e(5.140-0.601/X), followed by the cubic model with better fitting effect (R2 = 0.942). The fitting effect of additional two models was not ideal.
The fitting effect of S growth model of Alashan Bactrian camel’s chest circumference was the best (R2 = 0.972), the S growth model was Y=e(5.473-0.615/X). The fitting effect of cubic model (R2 = 0.967), and logarithmic model was considerable (R2 = 0.912) whereas the fitting effect of other models is not ideal. In contrast, the fitting effect of S model for the growth of Alashan Bactrian camel tube circumference was the best (R2=0.914), and S model was Y=e(3.006-0.674/X). The fitting effect of additional models was not ideal.
The cubic model and S model of the body weight of Alashan Bactrian camel had the best fitting effect (R2 = 0.979, 0.974). The cubic growth model of the body weight of Alashan Bactrian camel was Y=103.083+128.340X-11.138X2+0.325X3, and the S growth model was Y=e(6.491-1.228/X). The fitting effect of quadratic model and logarithmic model appeared better (R2 = 0.950, 0.951) among all, and logistic model showed the worst corelation (R2 = 0.682).
The results of the current study showed that the S growth model of the body weight of Alashan Bactrian camel was similar to that of Feng et al. (2008) who have shown that the S growth model of the body weight of Bactrian camel was Y=e(6.321-2.754/X). However, they have only studied the body weight growth model of Bactrian camel. In our study, not only the body weight growth model of Alashan Bactrian camel was studied, but the growth models of body height, body length, chest circumference and tube circumference of Alashan Bactrian camel were also invstigated. Therefore, finding of the current study provide a comprehensive data to further fuide the breeding of Alashan Bactrian camel in the country.
Acknowledgements
Sincere gratitude goes to the sponsor of Alxa League Science and Technology Project in Inner Mongolia (2012-12).
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Figures

Growth curve fitting of Alashan Bactrian Camel.
References
- Azha, T., Ha, E.A.L, Ha, D.X. and La, Z.T., 2012. Xinjiang Anim. Husb., 5: 58-60.
- Bai, J.Y., Di, W.R.T., Zhou, J.W., Zhang, W.B., Fan, H.D., Cao, H. and Fu, X.Y., 2020. Indian J. Anim. Res., 54: 936-941.
- Feng, D.Z. and Wu, C.X., 2008. Grass-Feeding Livest., 139: 22-25.
- Wang, H.J., Ma, K.M., Liu, Z.H., Jin, D.Z. and Wei, W.Q., 2016. J. Camel Pract. Res., 23: 241-246. https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-8934.2016.00041.2[CrossRef]
- Ye, W.L., Wang, F.L., Xie, Z.H., Wang, Y.G., Lin, B. and Wang, J.L. 2014a. J. Camel Pract. Res., 21: 191-198. https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-8934.2014.00033.2[CrossRef]
- Ye, W.L., Xie, Z.H., Wang, F.L., Gen, X., Dong, S., Wang, J.L., 2014b. J. Camel Pract. Res., 21: 103-109. https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-8934.2014.00020.4[CrossRef]
Services
Article usage statistics
Loading…
