ResearchersLinks

Review · Volume 58, Issue 1, 2 January 2026 · Open Access

An Overview of Insect Mite Association

· · · · · · · ·

Affiliations & Notes ⌄
  1. 1Agricultural College and Research Station, Killikulam-628252, India 2Institute of Agriculture, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kumulur-621712, Trichy, India 3Department of Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641003, India 4Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Sandhiyur-636203, India 5ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Thiruvarur-614404, India 6Nammazhvar Organic Farming Research Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
Article Info ⌄
Journal:
Pakistan Journal of Zoology
Published:
2 January 2026

From the article

  • Since, the attachment of mite in different insect host was predatory, phoresy and parasitic in nature, it can be utilized in all the ways and means.
  • Insect associated potential predatory mite will be exploited for the pest management studies and if possible, the mites will be multiplied on the same insect host.
  • On the other hand, to minimize the insect pest incidence, the ecto and endoparasitic mite studies have to be strengthened and it will pave way to enlighten the pest management aspects.

Selected from the article's own text.

Abstract

Mite comprises the largest group within the arthropodan of Class Arachnida, with over 45,000 described species in subclass Acari. The Arachnida is also represented by the spiders (Order: Araneae), harvestmen (Order: Opiliones) and pseudoscorpions (Order: Pseudoscorpionida). They exhibit greater diversity in their morphological, physiological, behavioral and ecological adaptations. These adaptations ensure their association with other arthropods and vertebrates. Acari-Insect association ranges from opportunistic, possible accidental to parasitic and predatory, in which one or more life stages of the mite occur and feed on the host. Special structures present in legs as well as gnathosoma leads to make the attachments easily.

Introduction

Insect-mite association is quite a long relationship, of which, it leads to phoretic, parasitic and predatory in nature. The placement of attachment may vary from insects to insects along with the associations. The overloading of mites in the insect body reduces the day today activity of host insects. These mites belong to orders Mesostigmata, Astigmata and Prostigmata. The detailed review on Acari- Insect association is summarized hereunder.

Order: Mesostigmata

More than 8,280 species have been described under Mesostigmata order in the world under 887 genera; 2 genera and 2 species in the fossil as reported by Lindquist (2005a). These groups are characterized by a single pair of breathing pores or stigmata, located laterally in the middle of the idiosoma between the second and third or third and fourth pair of legs. It also possesses two to three tined palpal claws and a tritosternum, for most mesostigmatid mites. It ranges from less than 0.2 mm to more than 4 mm in length and distributed globally. Mesostigmatid mites associated with economically important pests as well as biocontrol agents. It also found in quarantine inspections.

The principal host insect orders for the mesostigmatid mites are Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera and Lepidoptera. Almost 93 percent of the insect mites are associated with this particular mite order. Treat (1975) has narrated, comprehensive summary of mite-Lepidoptera association with 41 lepidopteran families. Even the association was also recorded from termite nests. Some of the mites are also having the characteristic features of predacious or parasitic in nature. The Phytoseiidae family are beneficial to humans as predators of the destructive spider mites.

Order: Astigmata

Lindquist (2005b) reported around 3,419 species of Astigmata in the world under 1096 genea; 2 genera and 3 species in the fossil. The mite super family Canestrinioidea attached as external commensals or parasites of most of the beetle families viz., Scarabaeidae, Chrysomelidae, Carabidae, Passalidae, Tenebrionidae and Lucanidae. Olynyk and Freitag (1979) stated that the mites are not site-specific on numerous insects especially carabids. The soil-dwelling bees and wasps are also attached with astigmatid mites which also establishing symbiotic relationships with both vertebrates and invertebrates.

Order: Prostigmata

More than 47 per cent are parasites or parasitoids of other arthropods and 7 percent of the species are free- living predators. The mite families viz., Pygmephoridae and Scutacaridaeare associated with social insects, whereas mite family Podapolipidae invade as parasites on beetles, grasshoppers and honey bees. A single mite genus i.e., Leptus spp. associated with extensive range of insect orders and it act as a parasitoid.

PHORESY

Phoresy means one animal (phorent) attaches another animal (carrier or host) for a limited time and period. At that time of migration, the phorent enters in to the quiescent stage and becomes active after its detachment. Soroker et al. (2003) narrated the steps of phoresy i.e., Initiation of phoretic behaviour, active host seeking, recognition of attractant behaviour and attachment to the host surface. The winged insects possess higher dispersal ability than the mites . Scutacarids are encountered as phoretic in behaviour . Parasitellus species prefers as better host on Bombus sp. for its phoretic purpose and Uroobovella species attached on the thoracic region of grasshopper as phoretic relationship (Radhakrishnan et al., 2024a).

The mesostigmatid mites and ectoparasitic larvae of the prostigmatid were attached with adult Culicoides impunctatus Goetghebuer . Whiteflies have strong phoretic potential with Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) and the mites reduces the mobility and its biology to some extend . The phoretic relationships will be highly complex, but often are manipulative of the carrier’s resources or progeny . Dung beetles are possessing mesostigmatid mites on the ventral region of the head and it is purely phoretic in nature (Radhakrishnan et al., 2024b). Phoretic association with bumble bees were recorded no risk for their host . Some of the phoretic mites associated with Diptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Hemiptera and Orthoptera have been summarized in Table I.

ACARI-SOCIAL INSECTS ASSOCIATION

Eickwort (1994) stated that mites are significant associate with the beneficial insects i.e., honeybees. Out of these association, a tracheal mite, Acarapis woodi is an obligate parasite of the honey bees Apis mellifera (L.) occurs many countries in the world . The host insect termite had associated with Histiostoma, parasitic on the subfamilies viz., Otopheidominae, Treatiinae and Katydiseiinae (Zhang, 1995). Noel et al. (2020) stated that, the integrated pest management decreases the acaricide usages to control the Varroa mite in bees. The lists of very few mites associated with social insects are summarized in Table II.

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS

PARASITIC MITES

Podapolipidae (Acari: Tarsonemina) family were parasitized on various insect orders and the mite species was parasitic on the metanotum, metathoracic wing region, abdominal dorsal surface in carabid beetles and four species from Australian carabid beetles .

The parasitic mites are divided into two groups based on their feeding sites.

Parasitic mites of insects (Ectoparasites)

The mite species Pyemotes tritici (Newp.) (Prostigmata: Pyemotidae), Blattisicius tarsalis (Berlese) (Mesostigmata: Ascidae), Acarophenax mahundai Steinkraus and Cross (Prostigmata: Acarophenacidae) are devoured as natural enemies of stored product insect pests . Certain mite species are also act as egg parasites of various insects and their biology was not known . Tenebrioniid beetles act as a parasitic host of canestriniid mite, Bircericola bertrami Haitlinger (Acari: Astigmata: Canestriniidae) (Haitlinger, 2000a). European butterfly adults are parasitized by bright red mite larvae of the family Trombidiidae .

Endoparasitic mites of insects

Alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica Gyllenhall was parasitized by the larvae of Trombidium newelli Welbourn and Flessel (Acari: Trombidiidae) . The insect order Orthoptera and Coleoptera were occupied the tracheae of Podapolipus and Locus tacarus. Sharma et al. (1983) stated that the mites pierce the cavity walls of the ear and destroy the ultrasonic sound.

Table I. Phoretic mites associated with different orders of insects.

Insect order and mite family

Mite name

Host insect name

Habit and habitat

References

Order: Diptera

Arctoseiidae

Iphidozercon sp.

Psychodid flies

Mites are phoretic on the abdomen of the flies

Whitsel and Schoepphenr, 1973

Rhizoglyphidae

Rhizoglyphus echinopus (F.andR.)

Narcissus fly

Phoretic

Hussey et al., 1969

Uropodidae

Fuscuropoda vegetans De Geer

Musca domestica

Phoretic

Greenberg, 1961

Order: Coleoptera

Canestriniidae

Grandiella batocerae (Vis.and Moh.)

Hylastes sp.

Mites found beneath the elytra

Vishnupriya and Mohanasundaram, 1988

Diplogyniidae

Diplogynium oryctae (Vis.and Moh.)

Batocera rufomaculata De Geer

Phoretic

Vishnupriya and Mohanasundaram, 1988

Eviphididae

Alliphis serrochaetae (Ram. and Moh.)

Helicopris sp.

Phoretic

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 1996a

Macrochelidae

Macrocheles scarabae (Vis. and Moh.)

Catharsius molossus (L.)

Phoretic

Vishnupriya and Mohanasundaram, 1988

Macrochelidae

Macrocheles sukabumiensis Hartini and Takaku

Cantharsius pithpcius (F.)

Phoretic

Hartini and Takaku, 2003

Parasitidae

Poecilochirus coimbatorensis (Vis. and Moh.)

Onthophagus sp.

Phoretic

Vishnupriya and Mohanasundaram, 1988

Pachylaelapidae

Pachylaelaps catharsiae (Vis.and Moh.)

Onitis philemon (F.)

Phoretic

Vishnupriya and Mohanasundaram, 1988

Uropodidae

Urobovella texana (Wis and Hirsch.)

Pholeomyia sp.

Phoretic

Moser, 1976

Winterschmidtiidae

Calvolia longireticulatae (Ram. and Moh.)

Meloid beetle

Phoretic

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 1999a

Uroactiniidae

Centrouropoda almerodai

Rhynchophorus phoenicis

Phoretic

Monzenga et al., 2021

Neopygmephoridae

Allopygmephorus coelostomus

Australian hydrophilid beetles

Phoretic

Hamid et al., 2022

Order: Hymenoptera

Cheyletidae

Cheletophyes xylocopae (Ram. and Moh.)

Xylocopa sp.

Phoretic

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 1999b

Chaetodactylidae

Samsinakia carabae (Ram. and Moh.)

Carabid beetle

Phoretic

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 1999b

Chaetodactylidae

Sennertia carpenteri (Ram. and Moh.)

Carpenter bees

Phoretic

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 2001

Laelapidae

Blattisocius trigonae

Trigona iridipennis

Phoretic

Radhakrishnan and Ramaraju, 2017a

Order: Hemiptera

Tarsonemidae

Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks)

Whiteflies

Phoretic

Palevsky et al., 2001

Erythraeidae

Erythraeus ankaraicus (Saboori et al.,)

Hyalopterus pruni Geoffroy

Ectoparasite

Saboori et al., 2004

Order: Orthoptera

Erythraeidae

Leptus laviniacus Haitlinger

Catantops innotabilis (Walk.)

Phoretic

Haitlinger, 2002

Erythraeidae

Leptus astrubali Haitlinger

C. innotabilis

Phoretic

Haitlinger, 2002

Scutacaridae

Imparipes bengalensis

Labidura bengalensis

Phoretic

Radhakrishnan and Ramaraju, 2017b

Table II. Mites associated with social insects.

Insect order and mite family

Mite name

Host insect name

Habit and habitat

References

I. Ants

Acaridae

Tyrophagus formicetorum (F and C)

Ant’s nest

Phoretic

Fain and Chmielewski, 1987

Uropodidae

Trichocylliba gibbata (E.)

Army ants

Phoretic

Elzinga, 1995

Scutacaridae

Scutacarus unicosimilis Metwali

Cataglyphus bicolor

(Lighton et al.,)

Large ant nest

Metwali, 1984

Macrodinychidae

Macrodinychus multispinosus

Ants

Ectoparasite

Lachaud et al., 2016

II. Honeybees

Acaridae

Acarus immobilis (G.)

Apis mellifera (L.)

Facultative scavenger

DeJong et al., 1982

Acaridae

Horstiella snellingi (Och. and OCon.)

Neotropical Epicharis bees

Phoretic

Ochoa and OConnor, 2000

Laelapidae

Androlaelaps bayoumi (Bas. and Yous.)

Trigona albipennis Almedia

Found inside the nest

Basha and Yousef, 2001

Laelapidae

Suracarus inusitatus (Flech.)

T. albipennis

Found inside the nest

Flechtmann, 2005

Laelapidae

Blattisocius trigonae

Trigona iridipennis

Phoretic

Radhakrishnan and Ramaraju, 2017a

Tarsonemidae

Acarapis woodi (Re.)

Euglossa sp.

Parasite

Pettis and Wilson, 1996

Tydeidae

Tydeus sp.

Pronematus sp.

A. mellifera

Found in bee hive

Malabanan and Corpuz Raros, 1998

Varroidae

Varroa jacobsoni (Oud.)

A. cerana

A. mellifera

Found in bee hive

Malabanan and Corpuz Raros, 1998

III. Other bees

Parasitidae

Parasitus fimetorum Berlese

Nest of Ciconia ciconia (L.)

Phoretic

Bloszyk et al., 2005

IV. Wasp

Glycyphagidae

Acaroglyphus robustus (Del.)

Eumenine wasp

Mites isolated from the body

Baker and Baker,1976

V. Termite

Otopheidomenidae

Eickwortius termes Zhang

Macrotermesmichaelseni Sjostedt

Phoretic

Zhang, 1995

Ascidae

Proctolaelaps hypadari (Oud.)

Termite

Parasitic on termite

Myles, 2002

Table III. Parasitic mites associated with different orders of insects.

Orders of insects and families of mites

Name of the mite

Host insect name

Habitat and nature of attack

References

Ectoparasitic mites

Order: Orthoptera

Erythraeidae

Leptus oxyae (Vis. and Moh.)

Oxya nitidula (Wal.)

Ectoparasite

Vishnupriya and Mohanasundaram, 1998

Erythraeidae

Ramsayellar angitata Zhang

Grasshopper

Ectoparasite

Zhang, 2000

Erythraeidae

Charletonia keralicus (Ram. and Moh.)

Oxya sp.

Parasite

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 1998b

Table continued on next page...............

Orders of insects and families of mites

Name of the mite

Host insect name

Habitat and nature of attack

References

Podapolipidae

Podapolipoides mohanasundarami (R. and S.)

Oxya sp.

Ectoparasite

Ramaraju and Suresh, 1999

Podapolipidae

Podapolipoides cohni (Hus. and Ma.)

Grasshopper

Ectoparasite

Husband and Martin, 2005

Podapolipidae

Podapolipus sundarababui (Ram. and Moh.)

Attractomorphasp

Ectoparasite

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 1996c

Eutrombidiidae

Eutrombidium laosanum Haitlinger

Undetermined Gryllidae

Ectoparasite

Haitlinger, 2006b

Order: Dictyoptera

Podapolipidae

Blaberpolipus cavernicola (Hus. and OCon.)

Blaberusparabolicus (Wal.)

Ectoparasite

Husband and OConnor, 2003

Order: Hemiptera

Trombidiidae

Podothrombium gossypium Zhang

Aphids

Ectoparasite

Zhang, 2001

Order: Diptera

Trombidiidae

Trombidium poriceps (Oud.)

Ochlerotatus notoscriptus Skuse

Ectoparasite

Pugh et al., 1991

Order: Lepidoptera

Pyemotidae

Pyemotes sp.

Tribolium sp.

Cryptolestes sp.

Parasitize the immature stages

Pajni and Virk, 1982

Podapolipidae

Regenpolipus madrasensis

(Hus. and Ram.)

Anthia sexguttata (Fab.)

Parasite

Husband and Ramaraju, 2006

Podapolipidae

Tarsopolipus ramakrishnai

(Ram. and Moh.)

Scarab beetles

Parasite

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 1996b

Podapolipidae

Eutarsopolipus dastychi

(Hus. and Kha. )

Calathus fuscipesGoeze

Parasite

Husband and Khaustov, 2004

Canestriniidae

Haitlingeria longilobata

Baker and Schwarz

Serrognathus platymelus Motschulsky

Parasite

Kim et al., 2006

Order: Odonata

Arrenuridae

Arrenurus sp.

Trithemis pallidinervis

Parasite

Radhakrishnan, Zawal and Ramaraju, 2010

Endoparasitic mites

Order: Lepidoptera

Otopheidonemidae

Dicrocheles phalaenodectes

Treat

Noctuidae

Tympanum

Treat, 1975

Order: Coleoptera

Podapolipidae

Dorsipes auncinus Husband and Weatherby

Tefflus sp.

Endoparasites of orthoptera, hymenoptera especially coleoptera

Husband and Weatherby, 2005

Five mite species were recorded from Laelapidae family as first time in Pakistan in the soil ecosystem . Bountiful species are reported under parasitic mite association. Few examples are mentioned in Table III.

Predatory mites of insects

Ferguson (2001) stated that predaceous mites are generally feeds on springtails whereas, the pyemotid mites devastated scales and flies . The eggs of Lepidoptera were fed by the deutonymph and adults of Callidosoma metzi Sharma, Drooz and Treat . Some of the predatory mites associated with the various orders of insects are given in Tables IV.

Table IV. Predatory mites associated with different orders of insects.

Orders of insects and families of mites

Name of the mite

Host insect

name

Habitat and nature of attack

References

Order: Orthoptera

Trombidiidae

Eutrombium trigonum (Pes.)

Heiroglyphus nigrorepletus (Ph.)

Predator on immature stages

Peswani, 1960

Order: Thysanoptera

Pyemotidae

Adactylidium sp.

Thrips sp.

Predaceous on eggs and thrips

EL Badry and Tawfik, 1966

Order: Hemiptera

Hemisarcoptidae

Hemisarcoptes malus (Sh.)

Aspidiotus nerii (B.)

Predator

Beardsley and Gonzalez, 1975

Trombidiidae

Allothrombium mitchelli Davis

Cryptococcus fagisuga Lindinger

Predator

Wiggins et al., 2001

Order: Diptera

Trombidiidae

Allothrombium dipterae (Ram. and Moh.)

Musca domestica (L.)

Predator

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 1998a

Trombidiidae

Allothrombium dipterae (Ram. and Moh.)

Cicindellid beetle

Predator

Ramaraju and Mohanasundaram, 1998a

Order: Lepidoptera

Ascidae

Blattisocius tarsalis Berlese

Ephestia cautella (Wal.)

Larvae and nymphs of mites feed eggs and host larvae

Graham, 1980

Pyemotidae

Pyemotes ventricosus (Newp.)

Sitotroga cerealella Olivier

Predatory on eggs

Navarro et al., 1987

Order: Coleoptera

Pyemotidae

Pyemotes tritici (Newp.)

Anthonomus grandis Boheman

Attacks immature stages

Cross and Moser, 1975

Order: Hymenoptera

Cheyletidae

Cheyletus eruditus Schrank

Cephalonom iatarsalis Ashmead

Biocontrol agent

Zdarkovaet al., 2003

Conclusion

The studies on Insect-Mite relationship were very scanty. Since, the attachment of mite in different insect host was predatory, phoresy and parasitic in nature, it can be utilized in all the ways and means. Insect associated potential predatory mite will be exploited for the pest management studies and if possible, the mites will be multiplied on the same insect host. On the other hand, to minimize the insect pest incidence, the ecto and endoparasitic mite studies have to be strengthened and it will pave way to enlighten the pest management aspects.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore for providing the lab facility to conduct the experiment.

Funding

No funding was provided /received for this experimental work.

IRB approval

The experimental work was carried out with the approval of Director of Research, TNAU, Coimbatore.

Ethical statement

All the applicable international, national or institutional guidelines for the care were followed.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baker, M.D. and Baker, E.W., 1976. Notes on hypopi (Acarina) associated with bees and wasps (Hymenoptera). J. N. Y. entomol. Soc., 84: 76-90.
  2. Basha, A.A. and Yousef, A.T.A., 2001. New species of Laelapidae and Ascidae from Egypt: genera Androlaelaps and Blasttisocius (Acari: Gamasida). Acaralogia, 41: 395-402.
  3. Baumann, J., 2024. An update on the knowledge about scutacarid mites as phoronts and inquilines. Acarologia, 64: 3-17. https://doi.org/10.24349/sy16-8iqn[CrossRef]
  4. Beardsley, J.W. and Gonzalez, R.H., 1975. The biology and ecology of armored scales. Annu. Rev. Ent., 20: 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.20.010175.000403[CrossRef]
  5. Bloszyk, J., Dariusz, J., Gwiazdowi, C.Z., Bajerlein, D. and Halliday, R.B., 2005. Nests of the white stork Ciconia ciconia (L.) as a habitat for mesostigmatic mites (Acari: Mesostigmata). Acta Parasitol., 50: 171-175.
  6. Bregetova, N.G. and Koroleva, E.V., 1960. The Macrochelid mites (Gamasoidae: Macrochelidae) in the USSR. Dept. separatae, parasitological collection. Parasitology, 18: 132-154.
  7. Cross, E.A. and Moser, J.C., 1975. A new dimorphic species of Pyemotes and a key to previously-described forms (Acarina: Tarsonemoidea). Annls entomol. Soc. Am., 68: 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/68.4.723[CrossRef]
  8. DeJong, D., Roger, A. and Eickwort, G.C., 1982. Mite pests of Honeybees. Annu. Rev. Ent., 27: 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.001305[CrossRef]
  9. Eickwort, G.C., 1994. Evolution and life-history patterns of mites associated with bees. In: Mites. Ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns (eds. M.A. Houck). Chapman and Hall, New York. pp. 218-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2389-5_9[CrossRef]
  10. El-Badry, E.A. and Tawfik, M.S.F., 1966. Life cycle of the mite Adactylidium sp., Acarina: Pyemotidae), a predator of thrips eggs in the United Arab Republic. Annls entomol. Soc. Am., 59: 458-461. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/59.3.458[CrossRef]
  11. Elzinga, R.J., 1995. Six new species of Trichocylliba (Acari: Uropodina) associated with Army ants. Acarologia, 36: 107-115.
  12. Fain, A. and Chmielewski, W., 1987. The phoretichypopi of two acarid mites described from ants nest; Tyrophagus formicetorum Volgin (1948) and Lasioacarus nidicolus Kadzhaja and Sevastianor (1967). Acarologia, 28: 58.
  13. Faroni, L.R.D’A., Guedes, R.N.C. and Matioli, A.L., 2001. Effect of temperature on development and population growth of Acarophenax lacunatus (Cross and Krantz) (Prostigmata: Acarophenacidae) on Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Biocontr. Sci. Technol., 11: 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150020029682[CrossRef]
  14. Ferguson, S.H., 2001. Changes in trophic abundance of soil arthropods along a grass-shrub-forest gradient. Can. J. Zool., 79: 457-464. https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-002[CrossRef]
  15. Flechtmann, C.H.W., 2005. Suracarus inusitatus (Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) from the nest of a stingless bee from Brazil. Int. J. Acarol., 31: 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950508684414[CrossRef]
  16. Goldarazena, A., Ochoa, R., Jordana, R. and Oconnor, B.M., 2001. Revision of the genus Adactylium Cross (Acari: Heterostigmata: Acarophenacidae), mites associated with thrips (Thysanoptera). Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash., 103: 473-516.
  17. Graham, W.M., 1980. Warehouse ecology studies of bagged maize in Kenya. II. Ecological observations of an infestation by Ephestia (Cadracautella) (Walk.) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 6: 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-474X(70)90004-4[CrossRef]
  18. Greenberg, B., 1961. Mite orientation and survival on flies. Nature, 190: 107-107. https://doi.org/10.1038/190107a0[CrossRef]
  19. Haitlinger, R., 2000a. A new species of larval Dasitrombium Zhang, 1994 (Acari: Prostigmata: Neothrombiidae) parasitic on grass hoppers from Nicaragua. Syst. Parasitol., 47: 65-67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006469919082[CrossRef]
  20. Haitlinger, R., 2002. Two new species of Leptus Latrellie. 1796 and the first record of Leptus astrubali Haitlinger (Acari: Erythraeidae) from India and Sri Lanka. Syst. appl. Acarol., 7: 177-184. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.7.1.20[CrossRef]
  21. Haitlinger, R., 2006b. Two new species of Eutrombidium Verdun, 1909 (Acari: Prostigmata: Eutrombidiidae) from Asia and a new host record for this genus. Syst. Parasitol., 67: 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-005-9025-3[CrossRef]
  22. Hartini, S. and Takaku, G., 2003. Japanese species of the mite genus Macrocheles (Arachnida: Acari: Gamasina: Macrochelidae). Zool. Sci., 20: 1261-1272. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.20.1261[CrossRef]
  23. Holte, A.E., Houck, M.A. and Collie, N.C., 2001. Potential role of parasitism in the evolution of mutualism in astigmatid mites: Hemisarcoptes cooremani as a model. Exp. appl. Acarol., 25: 97-107.
  24. Husband, R.W. and Kurosa, K., 2013. Eutarsopolipus asiaticus sp. nov., (Acari: Podapolipidae), subelytral parasite of Chlaeniuscostiger chaudoir (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from Japan. Syst. appl. Acarol., 18: 61–70. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.1.7[CrossRef]
  25. Husband, R.W. and Khaustov, A.A., 2004. A new species of Eutarsopolipus (Acari: Podapolipidae) from Calathus fuscipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from Ukraine. Int. J. Acarol., 30: 329-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950408684401[CrossRef]
  26. Husband, R.W. and OConnor, B.M., 2003. A new genus and species of mite (Acari: Tarsonemina: Podapolipidae) ectoparasite of the Peruvian cockroach, Blaberus parabolicus (Walker) and Eublaberus distanti (Kirby) (Blattoidea: Blaberidae). Int. J. Acarol., 29: 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950308684349[CrossRef]
  27. Husband, R.W. and Weatherby, C.A., 2005. Description of the male Auncinius (Acari: Podapolipidae) from Tefflus sp., Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Kenya and comparision of adult and larval females of Dorsipes auncinius from democratic republic of the Congo and South East Kenya. Int. J. Acarol., 31: 245-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950508684427[CrossRef]
  28. Husband, R.W. and Martin, J.M., 2005. A new species of Podapolipidae (Acari: Heterostigmata), parasite of Aidemona azteca (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Honduras and redescription of the genus Podapolipoides. Int. J. Acarol., 31: 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950508684426[CrossRef]
  29. Husband, R.W. and Ramaraju, K., 2006. A new species of Regenpolipus (Acari: Podapolipidae) from Anthia sexguttata (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from Southern India and a pictorial key to genera of world podapolipidae from Carabidae. Int. J. Acarol., 32: 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950608684454[CrossRef]
  30. Hussey, N.W., Read, W.H. and Hesling, J.J., 1969. The pests of protected cultivation. Arnold, London. pp. 187.
  31. Khadem-Safdarkhani, H., Hajiqanbar, H., Riegler, M., Seeman, O. and Katlav, A., 2022. Two new phoretic species of heterostigmatic mites (Acari: Prostigmata: Neopygmephoridae and Scutacaridae on Australian Hydrophilid beetles (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Insects, 13: 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13050483[CrossRef]
  32. Khan, A.K., Bruce, H.R. and Muhammad, H.B., 2024. New records of soil mites from Pakistan with description of a new species (Acari: Laelapidae). Persian J. Acarol., 13: 51.
  33. Kim, W., Lee, S., Choi, J., Sim, H., Kim, J., Choi, J. and Kim, K., 2006. A new canestriniid mite, Haitlingeria longilobata (Acari: Astigmata: Canestriniidae) parasitising Serrognathus platymelus castauicolor Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) from South Korea. Syst. Parasitol., 65: 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-006-9035-9[CrossRef]
  34. Kolster, J.M., Franziska, K., Heller, K., Mercado-Salas, N.F. and Husemann, M., 2024. Host range of the phoretic mite genus Parasitellus (Acariformes: Parasitidae) on wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes), with specific notes on its morphological and genetic diversity in Northern Germany. Integ. Syst. Stuttgart Contrib. Natl. Hist., 7: 31-42. https://doi.org/10.18476/2024.396542[CrossRef]
  35. Lachaud, J.P., Hans, K. and Gabriela, P.L., 2016. Macrodinychus mites as parasitoids of invasive ants: An overlooked parasitic association. Sci. Rep., 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29995[CrossRef]
  36. Lindquist, E.E., 2005a. Synopsis of the described Mesostigmata of the world. http://insects.tamu.edu.research/collection/hallan/acari/mesostigmata1.htm.
  37. Lindquist, E.E., 2005b. Synopsis of the described Astigmata of the world. http://insects.tamu.edu.research/collection/hallan/acari/astigmata1.htm.
  38. Malabanan, J.M. and Corpus-Raros, L.A., 1998. Mites associated with Apis mellifera Linnaeus and Apis cerana Fabricius in the southern Tagolog region, Phillippines. Philipp. Ent., 12: 123-135.
  39. Matheson, A., 1993. World bee health report. Bee World, 74: 176-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1993.11099183[CrossRef]
  40. Metwali, S.H., 1984. Survey on the family Scutacaridae (Acari) in Egypt. II. Acarologia, 25: 241-248.
  41. Mohamed, A.M.A. and Hogg, D.B., 1997. New ectoparasitic mite of alfalfa weevil in Wisconsin. Midwest Biol. Contr. News, 7: 5.
  42. Monzenga, L., Jean, C., Le, G., Guillaume, J., Keyisu, K. and Hannce, T., 2021. Phoretic mites associated with Rhynchophorus phoenicis Fabricius (1880) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Kisangani region, D.R. Congo. Acarologia, 61: 291-296. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20214431[CrossRef]
  43. Moser, J.C., 1976. Surveying mites (Acarina) phoretic on the Southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) with sticky traps. Can. Entomol., 108: 809-813. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent108809-8[CrossRef]
  44. Myles, T.G., 2002. Observations on mite (Acari) associated with the Eastern Subterranean termite, Reticulitermes flavipes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology, 39: 277-280.
  45. Navarro, R., Luna, C. and Juarej, R., 1987. Tests of different substrates for the mass multiplication of Sitotroga cerealella. Agron. Trop., 33: 111-121.
  46. Noël, A., Yves, L.C. and Fanny, M., 2020. Varroa destructor: How does it harm Apis mellifera honey bees and what can be done about it? Emerg. Top. Life Sci., 4: 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20190125[CrossRef]
  47. Ochoa, R. and OConnor, B.M., 2000. Revision of the genus Horstiella (Acari: Acaridae) mites associated with neotropical Epicharis bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annls entomol. Soc. Am., 93: 713-737. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0713:ROTGHA]2.0.CO;2[CrossRef]
  48. Olynyk, J.E. and Freitag, R., 1979. Some phoretic association of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and mites (Acarina). Can. Entomol., 3: 333-335. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent111333-3[CrossRef]
  49. Pajni, H.R. and Virk, N., 1982. Observations on some aspects of the biology of Tribolium castaneum Herbst., Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Res. Bull. Punjab Univ. Sci., 33: 155-158.
  50. Palevsky, E., Soroker, V., Weintraub, P., Mansour, F., Abo-Moch, F. and Gerson, U., 2001. How species-specific is the phoretic relationship between the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Acari: Tarsonemidae) and its insect hosts. Exp. appl. Acarol., 25: 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010645315630[CrossRef]
  51. Peswani, K.M., 1960. Eutrombidium trigonum Herman., Trombidiidae: Acarina) a predatory red mite of Heiroglyphus nigrorepletus Bolivar., Phadka. Indian J. Ent., 28: 411-412.
  52. Pettis, J.S. and Wilson, W.T., 1996. Life history of the honey bee tracheal mite (Acari: Tarsonemidae). Annls Ent. Soc. Am., 89: 368-374. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/89.3.368[CrossRef]
  53. Pugh, P.J.A., King, P.E. and Fordy, M.R., 1991. Larvae of Trombidium (Trombidium) poriceps (Oudemans) (Trombidiidae: Prostigmata: Acarina) parasitic on Chersodromia speculifera Walker (Empididae: Diptera: Hexapoda). Acarologia, 32: 23-27.
  54. Radhakrishnan, V. and Ramaraju, K., 2017a. New honeybee mite, Blattisocius trigonae sp. nov., Acari: Laelapidae), phoretic on Trigona iridipennis (Apidae: Hymenoptera) from Tamil Nadu, India. J. Ent. Zool. Stud., 5: 841-844.
  55. Radhakrishnan, V. and Ramaraju, K., 2017b. First record on Imparipes bengalensis sp. nov., Acari: Scutacaridae) on Labidura bengalensis Dohrn (Forficulidae: Dermaptera) from Tamil Nadu, India. J. Ent. Zool. Stud., 5: 1606-1611.
  56. Radhakrishnan, V., Vijay, S., Baskaran, V., Allwin, L., Ravi, M., Indiragandhi, P., Periyar Ramasamy, D., Ramaraju, K. and Sivakumar, S.D., 2024a. Description of Uroobovella tripophinae sp. Nov., Acarina: Uropodidae) phoretic association with grasshopper Trilophidia turpis Walker (Acrididae: Orthoptera) from Tamil Nadu, India. Pakistan J. Zool., pp. 1-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20240307080135[Full text][CrossRef]
  57. Radhakrishnan, V., Zawal, A. and Ramaraju, K., 2010. First record of parasitized Trithemis pallidinervis (kirby) from Tamil Nadu, India by Arrenurus larvae, with a description of larval morphology (Anisoptera: Libellulidae; Acari: Hydrachnidia). Odonatologica, 39: 243-252.
  58. Radhakrishnan, V., Allwin, L., Vijay, S., Baskaran, V., Ravi, M., Sivakumar, S.D., Indiragandhi, P. and Ramaraju, K., 2024b. Description of Gamasellus onitiae sp. nov., Ologamasidae: Mesostigmata) from dung beetle, Onitis philemon (Scarabaeidae: Coleoptera) in India. J. Ent. Sci., 60. https://doi.org/10.18474/JES24-21[CrossRef]
  59. Ramaraju, K. and Mohanasundaram, M., 1996a. A new species of Alliphis and Eviphis (Acari: Eviphididae) from Tamil Nadu, India. Turk. Ent. Derg., 20: 163-173.
  60. Ramaraju, K. and Mohanasundaram, M., 1996b. New species of Podapolipus, Podapolipoides and Tarsopolipus (Acari: Podapolipidae) from South India. Int. J. Acarol., 22(10): 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959608684079[CrossRef]
  61. Ramaraju, K. and Mohanasundaram, M., 1996c. A new Podapolipus species (Acari: Podapolipidae) from Tamil Nadu, India. Int. J. Acarol., 25: 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959908684152[CrossRef]
  62. Ramaraju, K. and Mohanasundaramm M., 1998a. Two new predacious mite species of Allothrombium (Trombidiidae: Prostigmata) from Tamil Nadu. J. Insect. Sci., 11: 110-113.
  63. Ramaraju, K. and Mohanasundaram, M., 1998b. Two new species of Charletonia Oudemans (Acari: Erythraeidae) from Tamil Nadu, India. J. Ent. Res., 22: 207-212.
  64. Ramaraju, K. and Mohanasundaram, M., 1999a. A new hypopus of Calvolia longireticulatae (Acari: Winterschmidtiidae) from Tamil Nadu, India. J. Ent. Res., 23: 47-49.
  65. Ramaraju, K. and Mohanasundaram, M., 1999b. Two new cheyletid mites (Acari: Cheyletidae) from Tamil Nadu, India. Int. J. Acarol., 25: 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959908683623[CrossRef]
  66. Ramaraju, K. and Mohanasundaram, M., 2001. New phoretic mites (Acari: Chaetodactylidae) on carpenter bees from Tamil Nadu, India. Int. J. Acarol., 27: 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950108684237[CrossRef]
  67. Ramaraju, K. and Suresh, S., 1999. A new species of Podapolipoides (Acari: Podapolipidae) from Tamil Nadu, India. Int. J. Acarol., 25: 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959908684153[CrossRef]
  68. Revainera, P.D., Silvina, Q., Gregorio, F.L., Facundo, M.A., Mariano, L., Alberto, H.A., Santiago, P., Martín, J.E. and Matías, D.M., 2020. Phoretic mites on South American bumblebees (Bombus spp.) as parasite carriers: A historical input. Apidologie, 51: 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-020-00733-w[CrossRef]
  69. Saboori, A., Cakmak, I. and Gonbalani, G.N., 2004. A new species of larval Erythraeus (Zaracarus) (Acari: Erythraeidae) from Turkey. Int. J. Acarol., 30: 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950408684381[CrossRef]
  70. Seeman, O.D. and Katlav, A., 2024. Podapolipid mites (Acari: Heterostigmata): Key to genera, biogeographical history and description of four new Australian species of Eutarsopolipus. Zootaxa, 5448: 301-347. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.1[CrossRef]
  71. Seeman, O.D. and Walter, D.E., 2023. Phoresy and mites: More than just a free ride. Annu. Rev. Ent., 68: 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120220-013329[CrossRef]
  72. Sharma, G.D., Drooz, A.T. and Treat, A.E., 1983. A new species of Callidosoma(Acari: Prostigmata: Erythraeidae) parasite on adults of Anacamptodes vellivolata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) as a larva, and predator of eggs of Lepidoptera as deutonymph and adult. Annls Ent. Soc. Am., 76: 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/76.1.120[CrossRef]
  73. Soroker, V., Nelson, D.R., Bahav, O., Reneh, S., Yablonski, S. and Palevsky, E., 2003. Whitefly wax as a cue for phoresy in the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Acari: Tarsonemidae), Chemoecology, 13: 163-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-003-0243-3[CrossRef]
  74. Southcott, R.V., 1986. Studies on the taxonomy and biology of the subfamily Trombidinae (Acarina: Trombidiidae) with a critical revision of the genera. Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser., 123: 1-116. https://doi.org/10.1071/AJZS123[CrossRef]
  75. Treat, A.E., 1975. Mites of moths and butterflies. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca. pp. 362.
  76. Vishnupriya, R. and Mohanasundaram, M., 1988. Mites associated with insects in Tamil Nadu, India. Entomology, 13: 247-257.
  77. Whitsel, R.H. and Schoepphenr, R.F., 1973. Mites associated with aquatic and semi-aquatic Diptera from sanmateo county, California. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash., 75: 71-77.
  78. Wiggins, G.J., Grant, J.F. and Welbourn, W.C., 2001. Allothrombium mitchelli (Acari: Trombidiidae) in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park: Incidence, seasonality and predation on Beech scale (Homoptera: Eriococcidae). Annls Ent. Soc. Am., 94: 896-901. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0896:AMATIT]2.0.CO;2[CrossRef]
  79. Wohltmann, A. and Wendt, F.E., 1996. Observations on the biology of two hygrobiotictrombidioid mites (Acari: Prostigmata: Parasitengonae), with special regard to host recognition and parasitism tactics. Acarologia, 37: 31-44.
  80. Zdarkova, E., Lukes, J. and Horak, P., 2003. Compatibility of Cheyletus eruditus (Schrank) (Acari: Cheyletidae) and Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) in biological control of stored grain pests. Pl. Prot. Sci., 39: 29-34. https://doi.org/10.17221/3824-PPS[CrossRef]
  81. Zhang Z.Q., 1995. The genus Neophanolophus (Acari: Smarididae) and description of a new species parasitic on an Erythroneura leaf hopper (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in India. Orient. Insects, 29: 371-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.1995.10433746[CrossRef]
  82. Zhang Z.Q., 2000. Ramsayella, new genus of Erythraeinae (Acari: Erythraeidae) parasitic on grasshoppers in New Zealand. Int. J. Acarol., 26: 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950008683633[CrossRef]
  83. Zhang Z.Q., 2001. Description of Podothrombium gossypium from cotton in Jiangxi, China, (Acari: Trombidiidae). Acta Zoot. Sin., 26: 172-178.

Services

Article usage statistics

Loading…