Research Article

 

First Pilot Study on the Prevalence of Tick Infestation in Livestock of Tehsil Hajira, Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir

 

Nizhat Sultana1, Asim Shamim2*, Muhammad Siddique Awan1, Usman Ali3, Murtaz Ul Hassan4, Rao Muhammad Siddique5

1Department of Zoology, University of Azad Kashmir; 2Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal sciences, University of Poonch, Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir; 3Department of Zoology, Mirpur University of Science and Technology Azad Kashmir; 4Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, UAAR; 5Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Editor | Kuldeep Dhama, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Received | May 13, 2015; Revised | June 21, 2015; Accepted | June 23, 2015; Published | June 27, 2015

*Correspondence | Asim Shamim, University of Poonch, Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan; Email: asimshamimuajk@gmail.com

Citation | Sultana N, Shamim A, Awan MS, Ali U, Hassan M, Siddique RM (2015). First pilot study on the prevalence of tick infestation in livestock of Tehsil Hajira, Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 3(8): 430-434.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2015/3.8.430.434

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331

Copyright © 2015 Sultana et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Ticks (Acari: Ixodid) are active vector, next to mosquitoes (Le Bars, 2009), in disease transmission found in tropical and subtropical (Jongejan and Uilenberg, 1994), region of the world. Tick causes detrimental effect to animals via blood loss/ drain, stress, irritation and despair of immune function (Ghosh et al., 2007). In addition to these effects, ticks are also reason of financial losses in term of reducing hide and skin value up to 20-30% (Biswas, 2003), and economical losses associated with the diseases they transmit directly to the hosts (Garcia, 2003). Due to climatic changes and global warming, ticks have a vectorial potential. The rate of tick infestation are expected to be change which further limit sustainable livestock production globally in general and in tropical area particular (Kabir et al., 2011). A sufficient numbers of published data is available on tick prevalence from bordering region of the study area of Azad Kashmir (Irshad et al., 2010; Atif et al., 2012) but not a single study was intended formerly to this study on tick prevalence which may represent tick infestation in the area. The prevalence of tick infestation in livestock is much higher in developing countries (Minjauw and McLeod, 2003). Therefore, present study was designed with the objective to be acquainted with point prevalence of ticks in the livestock population of the Azad Kashmir and moreover interest behind study upon tick was also provide more information about the environmental settings i.e. temperature and humidity to which ticks are prone to be exposed.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Study Area

The study was piloted from 1st June 2011 to 31st December, 2011 in the six villages naming Nundinaar, Kamorh, Kalah, Draykutti, Numbal and Naka of Tehsil Hajira of district Poonch/Rawalakot of Azad Kashmir lies between longitude 33º 51’ 28 North and latitude 73º 45’ 39 East. The study area is bounded by Bagh from North, Sudnuti by South, and East by occupied Kashmir (India) and west by Kahuta (Pakistan). Its population according to census 2006 was 0.490 million and its area is 855 km. Average maximum temperature of the year was 21.64˚C while minimum 7.20˚C. Maximum temperature was recorded in months of June and July while minimum temperature was recorded during December and January (Anonymous, 2011).

 

Sampling Technique

For the collection of data a random sampling technique (Thrushfield, 2007) was applied to gathered the data on tick prevalence from six village of the Tehsil Hajira. All the information required like age, sex, breed, managmental conditions, routine medication, and customs were collected on the predesigned proforma.

 

Specimen Collection

Before collection of ticks animals were restrain properly and their whole body was thoroughly inspected visually for the presence of tick. Tick specimens were collected following the procedure of Ica et al. (2007). After detachment of ticks through forcep from the animal body, they were preserved in 70% ethanol. The bottles were properly labelled and shipped to the Microbiology and Parasitological laboratory, Department of Zoology, Azad Kashmir University, Muzaffarabad, for identification and record of ticks.

 

Mounting and Identification of Ticks

Following the methods of (Soulsby, 1982), the tick specimens were mounted and identified using standard morphological tick identification keys (Walker et al., 2003) under stereomicroscope.

 

Statistical Analysis

All the data collected was analysed statistically by using software package SAS (Version 2010).

 

RESULTS

 

During the present survey six villages were visited and a total of 1350 animals viz. 600 goats, 300 sheep, 220 cows and 230 buffaloes were randomly inspected for tick collection. Out of 1350 animals 692/1350 (51.25%) animals were found positive/infested with ticks. From the sampled animals 288/600(48.00%) goats, 164/300(54.66%) sheep, 122/220(55.45%) cattle and 118/230(51.03%) buffaloes were found positive for ticks respectively. off the tick belong to genus Hylomma was identified i.e. Hylomma a. anatolicum commonly. The seasonal tick infestation during the study was observed in summer season than autumn season (Figure 1). Monthly highest prevalence of tick was during June and July and lowest during November. Sex-wise male animal were frequently infested than female animals. Association of various host and environment related determinants with the prevalence of ticks in livestock population of study area have been shown in Table 1. The overall prevalence in Livestock species, there was non-significant (P.>0.05) association in the present study.

 

 

Table 1: Prevalence and host associated features of ticks infesting livestock species of Tehsil, Hajira, Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir

Variables	Levels	Animals Screened	Ticks Positive	Prevalence (%)	Confidence interval 95%			Odds Ratio	P-value
					Lower limit		Upper limit
Animal Specie	Cattle	220	122	55.45	48.84		61.93	1.16	0.266
	Sheep	300	164	54.66	49.00		60.24	1.14	0.289
	Buffalo	230	118	51.30	44.85		57.73	1.07	0.614
	Goat	600	288	48.00	44.02		52.00	-	-
Cattle
Age	Young	74	56	75.68	37.21	54.79		1.67	0.024
	Adults	146	66	45.21	45.21	62.79		-	-
Sex	Male	82	60	73.17	40.38	58.02		1.63	0.034
	Female	138	62	44.93	41.98	59.62		-	-
Season	Summer	110	76	69.09	53.45	70.56		1.65	0.027
	Autumn	110	46	41.82	29.44	46.55		-	-
Buffalo
Age	Young	86	60	69.77	41.86	59.79		1.73	0.019
	Adults	144	58	40.28	40.21	58.14		-	-
Sex	Male	86	58	67.44	40.21	58.14		1.62	0.034
	Female	144	60	41.67	41.86	59.79		-	-
Season	Summer	115	74	64.35	53.73	71.08		1.68	0.027
	Autumn	115	44	38.26	28.92	46.27		-	-
Sheep
Age	Young	86	68	79.07	34.10	49.12		1.76	0.006
	Adults	214	96	44.86	50.88	65.90		-	-
Sex	Male	102	74	72.55	37.62	52.79		1.60	0.019
	Female	198	90	45.45	47.21	62.38		-	-
Season	Summer	150	100	66.67	53.35	68.22		1.56	0.022
	Autumn	150	64	42.67	31.78	46.65		-	-
Goat
Age	Young	176	118	67.05	35.40	46.73		1.67	0.001
	Adults	424	170	40.09	53.27	64.60		-	-
Sex	Male	204	128	62.75	38.78	50.22		1.55	0.003
	Female	396	160	40.40	49.78	61.22		-	-
Season	Summer	300	178	59.33	56.09	67.22		1.62	0.021
	Autumn	300	110	36.67	32.71	43.91		-	-

 

DISCUSSION

 

Ticks are potential vector of viral bacterial, protozoal and helminths diseases with zoonotic significance in animals and human (Dantas-Torres, 2008). So in this regard evidence about tick prevalence in any specific area in essential for the planning of control measure towards ticks and tick borne diseases. Due to continuous change in environmental setting, tick borne emerging and re-emerging infections of different causes have been reporting globally. In the present developmental scenario, it is very much necessary to attain information about the ever changing trends of diseases particularly of vector linked which infect livestock and Humans both. Widespread research studies have been piloted on the prevalence of the tick fauna and associated risk factors in numerous part of the world but the study area is not explored regarding this aspect. This is the first effort to conduct study in the area. Only single species of tick Hylomma anatolicum was identified from the examined livestock of the area. The identified species of tick was also reported by (Sajid et al., 2009; 2011; Atif et al., 2012; Biu et al., 2012; Monfared et al., 2013; Mustafa et al., 2014) from other areas. Results of the present study are somewhat similar or different to the studies carried out earlier in other part of the globe (Irshad et al., 2010; Sajid et al., 2011; Ahmed et al., 2012; Monfared et al., 2013; Iqbal et al., 2013; Tasawar et al., 2014; Hassan and Al-Zubaidi, 2014; Mustafa et al., 2014). Several environment related factors which support tick survival in the specific area including; temperature, humidity, rainfall (Greenfield et al., 2011), vegetation (Gray, 2002), host availability, season (Teel et al., 1996), altitude (Cadenas et al., 2007), breed, age, sex, stage of lactation, gestation period and nutritional status of the animal (Alonso et al., 2007; Yacob et al., 2008), body condition (Rony et al., 2010), method of application of acaricides (Bianchi et al., 2003) and husbandry practices (Sajid et al., 2011), and animal movement (Hassan and Osman, 2003). The reason of higher prevalence of tick in livestock species of the study area could be due to the climate and geography of the study area as the climate variables significantly affect ticks distribution in particular region (Estrada-Pena, 2003). Season plays key role in tick propagation and distribution and it is an established that peak tick prevalence has been reported in summer (Rony et al., 2010). From the surrounding part of the study area reports have shown that higher tick prevalence in summer (Durrani and Shakoori, 2009). Present study was carriedout in summer and autumn season depicted higher prevalence in summer when weather conditions were hot and humid that support ticks survival and expanding (Ghosh et al., 2007). Husbandry practices are also correlated with tick richness and distribution. In this situation, mixed grazing of different animal species at same pasture and / or mixed housing provides maximum opportunity for tick to infest large population at a time. In study area, sheds for animals are made of bricks and stones with mud which provides cracks and cervices that suits for nidiculoous questing behaviour of ticks (Soulsby, 1982). Result of the current study found that male and young crop of livestock species were more exposed to tick infestation. This could be due to the less attention has been paid by owner towards male in the investigated area and on the other hand hormonal effect mainly, androgen and oestrogen which had inhibitory and stimulatory effect on immune response due to which male animals are more prone to ticks then females (Bilbo and Nelson, 2001). Soft and pliable skin of young animal facilitates tick and prolongs duration of attachment (Sajid et al., 2009; Kabir et al., 2011). In male animals higher prevalence was also reported by (Tasawar et al., 2014). Awareness about the treatment of infested animals and lack of veterinary facilities are the noteworthy reasons for high tick infestation in the area.

 

CONCLUSION

 

So it has been concluded that ticks are prevalent in the livestock population of study area and different determinants including age, sex, and season are the risk factors for tick distribution.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

 

On the basis of results of the present study some recommendations are advised for farmers and researchers (a) prophylactic therapy, to their livestock population must be administered at the start of warm season (April-May), (b) young and male animals should especially be attended (c) livestock and dairy development organizations must launch an awareness campaign to the areas for possible threats of tick and ticks borne diseases to the livestock (d) screening of ticks for the detection of pathogen of zoonotic significance using modern biotechnology tools. (e) arrange such kind of study in other areas of Azad Kashmir.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

The authors are thankful to the farmer community of the study area and field staff of Livestock Department of Tehsil Hajira, Poonch District, of Azad Kashmir for their support during tick collection.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

 

There exist no conflict of interest.

 

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION

 

All the authors have equal contribution for this manuscript.

 

REFERENCES

 

Ahmed S, Muhammad N, Abdual W, Mansoor, firdusia AA (2012). Investigations into Ixodidae ticks in cattle in Lahore Pakistan. Vet. Italainia. 48 (2):185-191.

Alonso DMA, López SBJ, Leme DLAC, Rodríguez VRI (2007). Infestación natural de hembras de Boophilus microplus Canestrini, 1887 (Acari: Ixodidae) en dos genotipos de bovinos en el trópico húmedo de Veracruz, México. Vet. México. 38: 503-509.

Bianchi MW, Barre N, Messad S (2003). Factors related to cattle infes-tation level and resistance to acaricides in Boophilus microplus tickpopulations in New Caledonia. Vet. Parasitol. 112: 75–89.

Anonymous (2011). Pakistan Metrological Department, Lahore, Pakistan.

Atif F A, Khan MS, Iqbal HJ, Ali Z, Ullah S (2012). Prevalence of cattle tick infestation in three districts of the Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. J. Sci. 64(1): 49-53.

Bilbo SD, Nelson R J (2001). Sex steroid hormones enhance immune function in male and female Hamsters. Am. J. Phys. Reg. Int. Comp. Phy. 280(2): 207-213.

Biswas S (2003). Role of veterinarians in the care and management during harvest of skin in livestock species. In: Proc. National Seminar on Lather Industry in Today’s Perspective, Kolkata, India. 62-64.

Biu AA, Rabo JS, Dawurung JS, Abubakr S IG (2012). Survey study on the tick fauna of small ruminants on the University of Maiduguri Research Farm (UMRF), Nigeria. Academia. Arena. 4(3):1-3.

Cadenas FM, Rais O, Jouda F, Douet V, Humair PF, Moret J, Gern L (2007). Phenology of Ixodes ricinus and infection with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato along and north- and south-altitudinal gradient on Chaumont Mountain, Switzerland. J. Med. Entomol. 44: 683-693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/44.4.683

Dantas-Torres F (2012). Canine vector-borne diseases in Brazil. Parasite Vectors. 1: 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-1-25

Durrani AZ, Shakoori AR (2009). Study on ecological growth conditions of cattle Hyalomma ticks in Punjab, Pakistan. Iranian. J. Parasitol. 4(1): 19-25.

Estrada-Peña A, Bouattour A, Camicas JL, Guglielmone A, Horak I, Jongejan F, Latif A, Pegram R, Walker AR (2006). The known distribution and ecological preferences of the tick subgenus Boophilus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Africa and Latin America. Exp. Appl. Acarol. (38): 219–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-006-0003-5

Garcia Z (2003). Integrated control of Boophilus microplus in cattle. In: Proc. 11th Int. Congr. Int. Society for Animal Hygiene, Mexico City, Mexico.

Ghosh S, Bansel GC, Gupta SC, Ray D, Khan MQ, Irshad H, Shahaiduzzaman M, Seitzer, Ahmed JS (2007). Status of ticks distribution in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. Parasit. Res. 101: 207-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0684-7

Gray JS (2002). Biology of Ixodes species ticks in relation to tick-borne zoonoses. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 114: 473–478.

Greenfield BPJ (2011). Environmental parameters affecting tick (Ixodes ricinus) distribution during the summer season in Richmond Park, London. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biohorizons/hzr016

Hassan RH, Al-Zubaidi HH (2014). Cattle and buffaloes tick’s infestation in Wasit province districts, Iraq. Kufa. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 5(1): 31-40.

Hassan SM, Osman AM (2003). Ecological and biological factors determining population dynamics of ixodid ticks: A review. Sudan. J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 42(1-2): 16–44.

Ica A, Inci A, Vatansaver Z, Kraer Z (2007). Status of ticks infestation of cattle in the Keyseri region of Turkey. Parasitol. Res. 101(2): 167-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0695-4

Iqbal A, Sajid MS, Khan MN, Khan MK (2013). Frequency distribution of hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting bubaline population of district Toba Tek Singh, Punjab, Pakistan. Parasitol. Res. 112(4): 535-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-3164-7

Iqbal A, Sajid MS, Khan MN, Muhammad G (2014). Epizootiology of ectoparasitic fauna infesting selected domestic cattle population of Punjab, Pakistan. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 16:443-446.

Irshad N, Qayyum M, Hussain M, Khan MQ (2010). Prevalence of tick infestation and theileriosis in sheep and goats. Pak. Vet. J. 30(3): 178-180.

Jongejan F, Uilenberg G (1994). Ticks and control methods. In: Blancou J, editor. Ectoparasites of animals and control methods. Sci Tech Rev, 13 (4). Paris, France: Office. Int. des. Epi (OIE). Pp. 1201-1226.

Jongejan F, Uilenberg G (2004). The Global importance of ticks. Parasitology. 29: 13–14.

Kabir MHB, Mondal MMH, Eliyas M, Mannan MA, Hashem MA, Debnath NC, Miazi OF, Mohiuddin C, Kashem MR, Islam, Elahi MF (2011). An epidemiological survey on investigation of tick infestation in cattle at Chittagong district, Bangladesh. Afr. J. Micro. Res. 5(4): 346–352.

Kadir MA, Zangana IK, Mustafa BHS (2012). A study on epidemiology of hard tick (Ixodidae) in sheep in Sulaimani governorate Iraq. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci. 26(3): 95-103.

Le Bars C (2009). Tick-borne disease management. Vet. Times. http://www.vetsonline.com/publications/veterinary-times/archives/n-39-33/tick-borne-disease-treatment.html

Minjauw B, McLeod A (2003). Tick-borne diseases and poverty. The impact of ticks and tick-borne diseases on the livelihood of small scale and marginal livestock owners in India and eastern and southern Africa. Research report, DFID Animal Health Programme, Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK. 59-60.

Monfared AL, Mohammad M, Roohollah F (2015). Prevalence of ixodid ticks on cattle, sheep and goats in Ilam County, Ilam Province, Iran. J. Para. Dis. 39(1): 37-40.

Mustafa I, Rana MKS, Marghoob S, Iftikhar A, Aleem R, Sadaf J, Hira M, Shabbier RG , Ghani A, Mahmood T, Aslam M, Khan MR, Asif S, Malik IU, Muhammad AB, Aqeel MA, Qayyum M, Waqas A, Ahmed H (2014). Seasonal activity of tick infestation in goats and buffalo of Punjab province (district Sargodha), Pakistan. Kafkas. Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 20 (5): 655-662.

Rony SA, Mondal MMH, Begum N, Islam MA, Affroze S (2010). Epidemiology of ectoparasitic infestations in cattle at Bhawal forest area, Gazipur. Bang. J. Vet. Med. 8: 27-33.

Sajid MS, Iqbal Z, Khan MN, Muhammad G (2009). In vitro and in vivo efficacies of ivermectin and cypermethrin against the cattle tick Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasitol. Re.s 105(5): 1133–1138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1538-2

Sajid MS, Iqbal Z, Khan MN, Muhammad G, Needham G, Khan MK (2011). Prevalence, associated determinants, and in vivo chemotherapeutic control of hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting domestic goats (Capra hircus) of lower Punjab, Pakistan. Parasitol. Res. 3(1): 601–609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2103-8

SAS 2010. SAS/STAT User Guides version 6.12. SAS Inst Inc, Cary, NC, USA.

Soulsbly EJL (1982). Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesiticated animals. 7th ed. Bailliere Tindal, London UK. pp. 809.

Tasawar Z, Nasim S, Lashari MH (2014). The prevalence of ixodid ticks on buffaloes at private animal farm Bibipur, Multan. Global. Vet. 12 (2): 154-157.

Teel PD, Marin SL, Grant WE (1996). Simulation of host parasite landscape interactions: influence of season and habitat on cattle fever tick (Boophilus sp.) population dynamics. Ecol. Model. 84:19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(94)00142-1

Thrusfield M (2007).Veterinary Epidemology. 2nd edition. UK: Black Wellscience Ltd. 182-98.

Walker AR, Bouattour JL, Camicas AE, Pena IG, Horak AA, Latif RG, Pegram P (2003). Ticks of domestic animals in Africa. A guide to identification of species. Biosciences report. Atal. Hout. Netherland. 74: 218-221.

Yacob HT, Ataklty H, Kumsa B (2008). Major ectoparasites of cattle in and around Mekelle, northern Ethiopia. Entomol. Res. 38: 126-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5967.2008.00148.x