Research Article

 

PCR Amplification Protocol for GC Rich Protamine Gene from Chicken Testis cDNA

 

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma1, Chathathayil Muhammedali Shafeeque2, Jag Mohan1, Parappurath Abdul Azeez2, Ram Pratap Singh2

1Physiology and Reproduction Division, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar 243122, Bareilly, India; 2Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History Anaikatty 641108, Coimbatore, India.

Editor | Kuldeep Dhama, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Received | October 20, 2014; Revised | November 15, 2014; Accepted | November 18, 2014; Published | November 20, 2014

*Correspondence | Ram Pratap Singh, Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History Anaikatty, India; Email: rampratapsingh81@gmail.com

Citation | Sharma SK, Shafeeque CM, Mohan J, Azeez PA, Singh RP (2014). PCR amplification protocol for GC rich Protamine Gene from chicken testis cDNA. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2 (11): 599-605.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.11.599.605

ISSN (Online | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331

Copyright © 2014 Sharma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique enables researchers to produce millions of copies of a specific DNA or RNA sequence within a very short time period, and thereby has become one of the widely used techniques in the diagnostics and molecular biology laboratories. However, amplification of GC rich templates using PCR is usually difficult compared to non-GC-rich targets (McDowell et al., 1998). GC rich regions produce complex inter and intra strand folding (hairpins and loops) due to increased hydrogen bonding with neighbouring cytosine and guanine (Musso et al., 2006). These secondary structures in DNA are resistant to melting and cause Taq DNA polymerases to stall and they also hampers primer annealing, resulting in incomplete or non-specific amplification (Shore and Paul, 2010; Hubé et al., 2005). As a result of this, several approaches have been tried to amplify GC rich templates by adding dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol, polyethylene glycol, formamide, betaine, 7-deaza-dGTP, and dUTP in the reaction mixture (Baskaran et al., 1996; Chakrabarti and Schutt, 2001; Henke et al., 1997; Kang et al., 2005; Musso et al., 2006; Mutter and Boynton, 1995; Pomp and Medrano, 1991; Sidhu et al., 1996; Sun et al., 1993; Turner and Jenkins, 1995; Weissensteiner and Lanchbury, 1996). These additives either alone or in combination with others resolve the complex secondary structure formation at GC-rich regions (Henke et al., 1997; Musso et al., 2006; Ralser et al., 2006), or they enhanced the amplification possibilities of GC-rich templates. It was also shown that template denaturation with NaOH, hot start PCR, step-down PCR, and primer modification can improve PCR amplification of highly GC-rich regions of DNA (Agarwal and Perl, 1993; Sahdev et al., 2007). These efforts to amplify GC-rich regions are found useful in some but not in all the cases (Mamedov et al., 2008) and highlight the need to standardize GC-rich gene specific protocol to overcome the problem.

 

Protamine (PRM) is one of the genes having very high GC content (88% in the coding region) in chicken (Oliva and Dixon, 1989). The chicken PRM gene is intron less (Oliva and Dixon, 1989), strikingly similar to mammalian protamines (Nakano et al., 1976). Most recently, PRM transcripts in sperm has emerged as fertility/infertility biomarkers (Miller, 2011; Shafeeque et al., 2014a). However, their role in avian sperm is not studied in detail (Shafeeque et al., 2014b), most probably because of difficulties in amplifying avian protamine gene due to its high GC content. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an easy PCR protocol to amplify the GC rich PRM.

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

The protocols involving the care and use of animals for these experiments were in accordance with the rules of the ‘Animal Ethics Monitoring Committee of the Central Avian Research Institute’.

 

Experimental Birds

In the current study, adult male (35 weeks old) broiler breeders (IC 3) from the same hatch were used. The birds were housed in individual cages and were maintained under uniform standard management conditions with 14 h light: 10 h dark.

 

Sample Collection

Four birds were sacrificed and a small piece (approx 1cm long) of testes from each bird was collected aseptically and washed in chilled RNase free PBS. Special care was taken to remove blood from the samples. Each collected sample was divided into 2 parts: the first part was used immediately for RNA isolation while the second part was immersed in RNAlater and stored at –4°C.

 

RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription

Total RNA from individual sample was extracted by RNAzol® RT (Molecular Research Centre, Inc., Cincinnati, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 25mg tissue samples were used for RNA isolation. An optional phase separation step by using 4-bromoanisole was performed during total RNA isolation to eliminate gDNA contamination. The concentrations and purities of isolated RNA samples were determined spectrophotometrically at A260 and A280nm. For all samples, the RNA 260/280nm absorbance ratio was ≥2.0, and concentration was approx 4500ng/µl. Further, all the RNA samples were used for PCR with β-actin primer to check DNA contamination. DNA free total RNA samples (1µg) were reverse transcribed using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (MBI Fermentas, Hanover, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resultant cDNA was stored frozen at –20°C until used.

 

Protamine Amplification by PCR

Exonic region of PRM gene (187 bp) was amplified using a pair of gene specific primer (F: 5′-CGCAGCAGGACCCGCAGCCG-3′ and R: 5′-CGGCGGCGGCGGCTCAGTAG-3′) with available three different Taq DNA Polymerases (Go Taq from Promega, USA; Taq DNA polymerase from Geneaid, Taiwan; and hot start Taq DNA polymerase from Fermentas, Canada). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in a total volume of 25 μl containing 4μl of 10 times diluted first strand of cDNA, 1X PCR buffer (Geneaid, Taiwan), 1.5mM MgCl2 (2.0 mM for Geneaid Taq), 2.5 mM of dNTPs, 5 pM of each primer and 0.625 unit of Taq DNA polymerase for Go Taq and Hot Start Taq (one unit for Geneaid Taq) in presence and absence of 8% DMSO. Gradient PCR methodology was used to ascertain the optimum annealing temperature of protamine primer pair for successful amplification of PRM gene. After the initial denaturation at 96oC for 5 min, the PCR profile consisted of a denaturation step at 97oC for 20sec, an annealing step from 60.6 to 67.5oC for 30sec with and an elongation step at 74oC for 20sec in total for of 34 cycles, followed by a final extension of 5min at 74oC. The PCR product was run on 1.5 % agarose gel including EtBr in 1X TAE buffer. The gel was visualized under UV light and was photographed using automated gel documentation system. The concentration of buffer, MgCl2, DMSO, template and hot / normal start were optimised for the Go Taq DNA Polymerase.

 

 

RESULTS

 

We have amplified PRM amplicon successfully at all the given temperatures (60.6-67.5) using 1.5mM MgCl2 and Go Taq DNA polymerase only in presence of 8% DMSO (Figure 1.1). However, it could not be amplified productively at any given temperature by using hot-start Taq DNA Polymerase from Fermentas (Figure 1.2) or Taq from Geneaid (Figure 1.3) in presence /absence of DMSO. To find out optimal buffer concentration, separate PCR reactions were setup with addition of 1X, 0.8X, 0.6X, 0.4X, 0.2X buffer and without buffer. Results indicated that 0.8X buffer (Figure 2) concentration was optimum for good amplification. Further, concentration of MgCl2 was optimized in separate PCR reactions with addition of 1.0mM, 1.4mM, 1.8mM, 2.2mM, 2.6mM and 3.0mM MgCl2. Good amplification was achieved at 1.4mM MgCl2 (Figure 3). Additionally DMSO concentration was optimized at optimum buffer and MgCl2 concentration in a separate PCR reaction with addition of 4.0%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 12% and 14% DMSO. Final concentration of 10% DMSO was the only one to provide the desired amplicon yield without nonspecific amplification (Figure 4). Furthermore, concentration of template (1-6µl of 10 time’s diluted cDNA) was also optimized in a new PCR reaction with optimum concentrations of buffer, MgCl2 and DMSO. The optimum template concentration was 5µl (Figure 5) to obtain best PCR efficiency. Finally, effect of hot start and normal start PCR was observed by two separate reactions, one kept at cold PCR block while running the PCR and another kept directly at Hot (96°C) block while running the PCR. Results indicated that product amplified using Hotplate has very less primer dimer (Figure 6).

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

Determining the most suitable direct PCR DNA polymerase for detecting a high GC rich target is time-consuming and costly. However, our data highlight the importance of comparing the performance of three DNA polymerases prior to establishing PCR conditions. The results indicated that among the commercially available polymerases we tested; only Go Taq DNA polymerase has the potential for the amplification of more than 80 percentage GC rich region. We optimised different PCR conditions for Go Taq DNA polymerase, which are as follows.

 

To optimize the PCR thermal cycling conditions, one has to determine the optimal temperature and length of each of the program segments, as well as the number of cycles. Of those, the most important parameter seems to be the temperature of primer annealing, as even the smallest deviation of 1°C or 2°C could make a significant difference between specific and nonspecific amplification (Roux, 2009; Lo and Chan, 2006). The optimal primer annealing temperature for a particular PCR amplification depends on the base composition, nucleotide sequence, length and concentration of the primers (Saiki, 1989). A typical primer annealing temperature is 5°C below the calculated Tm of the primers. Increasing the annealing temperature enhances discrimination against incorrectly annealed primers and reduces mis-extension of incorrect nucleotides at the 3′ end of primers. Therefore, a higher annealing temperature increases amplification specificity. In general, the annealing temperatures usually range between 55°C and 72°C. However, since the G–C pair is bound by three hydrogen bonds, while A–T pairs is bound by only two, high GC content corresponds to higher melting temperature and requires higher temperature for primer annealing (Kramer and Coen 2001; Mamedov et al., 2008). In the present study, the annealing temperature was determined to 67.5°C in presence of DMSO. Gradient PCR reaction showed that the optimal annealing temperature for our PCR reaction was between 60.6°C to 67.5°C.

 

We optimised the strength of the PCR buffer supplied with the Taq DNA polymerase and found that 0.8 buffer strength was good for best amplification of PRM amplicon instead of the recommended buffer strength. Reason behind this may be that the melting temperature of DNA increases with higher ionic strength.

 

In the present study, the MgCl2 concentration tested was within the range of 1.0 to 3.0mM, and the optimum observed was 1.4mM. Yet, up to 2.2mM MgCl2 also resulted in satisfactory amplification, which gave best results when performed on PCR products obtained with 1.4mM MgCl2 concentration. The observed range of acceptable molarities was broad most probably due to the presence of enhancer DMSO, known to improve the success of PCR reaction even at different MgCl2 concentrations (Kramer and Coen, 2001).

 

Addition of DMSO to the reaction mixture turned out to be essential for successful amplification, and none of the previously described optimization strategies could have been implemented without its presence. Optimal concentration of 10% was determined after testing three different options, which was within the recommended range of 1–10% (Grunenwald, 2003; Kolmodin and Birch, 2002).

 

The quality and concentration of DNA templates can directly affect the outcome of PCR amplifications. To achieve satisfactory amplification, certain baseline conditions may be used as a starting point for optimizing PCR amplification. For a typical PCR, 104 to 107 molecules/100 to 500ng of template DNA is recommended. There are several methods for purifying DNA for PCR amplification, including commercially available kits, as well as standard methods (Sambrook et al., 1989). Analysis by pulsed-field agarose gel electrophoresis is typically recommended for template DNA used in long PCR to assure its purity and integrity.

 

In the present study, all PCR components was mixed at a lower temperature on ice and then PCR block was heated to 96°C; PCR reaction tubes transferred directly to hot block from ice. Adopting this procedure we observed a significant decline in primer dimer formation in comparison to PCR run as usual.

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

PRM amplicon successfully amplified only with Go Taq DNA polymerase in presence of DMSO. The optimization of the PCR conditions included determination of optimal MgCl2 concentration, buffer strength and annealing temperature, in presence of 10% DMSO and the DNA template of acceptable concentration, resulted in successful amplification. In addition, PCR started directly at hot plate is also important to get rid of primer-dimer formation.

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for supporting this research program (SERB/FT/LS–147/2011).

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Agarwal RK, Perl A (1993). PCR amplification of highly GC-rich DNA template after denaturation by NaOH. Nucleic Acids Res. 21(22): 5283–5284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.22.5283

 

Baskaran N, Kandpal RP, Bhargava AK, Glynn MW, Bale A, Weissman SM (1996). Uniform amplification of a mixture of deoxyribonucleic acids with varying GC content”. Genome Res. 6(7): 633–638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.6.7.633

 

Chakrabarti R, Schutt C E (2001). The enhancement of PCR amplification by low molecular weight sulfones. Gene. 274(1-2): 293–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00621-7

 

McDowell DG, Burns N A, Parkes H C (1998). Localized sequence regions possessing high melting temperature prevent the amplification of a DNA mimic in competitive PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 26(14):3340–3347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.14.3340

 

Grunenwald H (2003). Optimization of polymerase chain reactions”. In: Bartlett JMS, Stirling D, editors. Methods in Molecular Biology. PCR Protocols, second edition, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0055-0_20

 

Henke W, Herdel K, Jung K, Schnorr D, Loening SA (1997). Betaine improves the PCR amplification of GC-rich DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(29): 3957–3958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.19.3957

 

Hubé F, Reverdiau P, Iochmann S, Gruel Y (2005). Improved PCR method for amplification of GC-rich DNA sequences. Mol. Biotechnol. 31(1): 81–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/MB:31:1:081

 

Kang J, Lee MS, Gorenstein DG (2005). The enhancement of PCR amplification of a random sequence DNA library by DMSO and betaine: application to in vitro combinatorial selection of aptamers. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods. 64(2):147–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.06.003

 

Kolmodin LA, Birch DE (2002). “Polymerase chain reaction. Basic principles and routine practice. Methods Mol. Biol. 192(1): 3–18.

 

Kramer MF, Coen DM (001). Enzymatic amplification of DNA by PCR: Standard procedures and optimization. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Chapter 15: Unit 11.

 

Lo YMD, Chan KCA (2006). Introduction to the polymerase chain re-action. In: Lo YMD, Chiu RWK, Chan KCA, editors. Clinical Applications of PCR, second edition, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-074-X:1

 

Mamedov TG, Pienaar E, Whitney SE, TerMaat JR, Carvill G, Goliath R, Subramanian A, Viljoen HJ (2008). A fundamental study of the PCR amplification of GC-rich DNA templates. Comput. Biol. Chem. 32: 452–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2008.07.021

 

Miller D (2011). Sperm RNA: Reading the Hidden Message. Chapter in, “Epigenetics and Human Reproduction” . Pp.329-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14773-9_15

 

Musso M, Bocciardi R, Parodi S, Ravazzolo R, Ceccherini I (2006). Betaine, dimethyl sulfoxide, and 7-deaza-dGTP, a powerful mixture for amplification of GC-rich DNA sequences. J. Mol. Diagn. 8(5): 544–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060058

 

Mutter GL, Boynton KA (1995). PCR bias in amplification of androgen receptor alleles a trinucleotide repeat marker used in clonality studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 23(8): 1411–1418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.8.1411

 

Nakano M, Tobita T, Ando T (1976). Studies on a protamine (Galline) from fowl sperm. Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res.  8(6): 565–578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3011.1976.tb02537.x

 

Oliva RR, Dixon GH (1989). Chicken protamine genes are intronless. J. Biol. Chem. 264(21): 12472–12481.

 

Pomp D, Medrano JF (1991). Organic solvents as facilitators of polymerase chain reaction. Biotechniques 10(1): 58–59.

 

Ralser M, Querfurth R, Warnatz HJ, Lehrach H, Yaspo ML, Krobitsch S (2006). An efficient and economic enhancer mix for PCR,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 347(3): 747–751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.151

 

Roux KH (2009). Optimization and troubleshooting in PCR. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. (4)pdb.ip66. doi: 10.1101/pdb.ip66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/pdb.ip66

 

Sahdev S, Saini S, Tiwari P, Saxena S, Singh SK (2007). Amplification of GC-rich genes by following a combination strategy of primer design, enhancers and modified PCR cycle conditions. Mol. Cell. Probes. 21(4): 303–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2007.03.004

 

Saiki RK (1989). The design and optimization of the PCR,” in PCR Technology (Erlich, H. A., ed.), Stockton Press, New York. Pp. 7–16.

 

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989). Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual,” Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

 

Shafeeque CM, Singh RP, Sharma SK, Mohan J, Sastry KVH, Kolluri G, Saxena VK, Tyagi JS, Kataria JM, Azeez PA (2014a). Development of a new method for sperm RNA purification in the chicken. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 149(3-4): 259-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.06.032

 

Shafeeque CM, Sharma SK, Sastry KVH, Mohan J, Singh RP (2014b). Sperm RNA: a new class of fertility biomarkers for birds. Adv. Anim.Vet. Sci. 2 (3): 155–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.3.155.158

 

Shore R, Paul N (2010). Robust PCR amplification of GC-rich targets with hot start 7-deaza-dGTP. Biotechniques 49(5): 841–843. http://dx.doi.org/10.2144/000113552

 

Sidhu M K, Liao M J, Rashidbaigi A (1996). Dimethyl sulfoxide improves RNA amplification. Biotechniques. 21(1): 44–47.

 

Sun Y, Hegamyer G, Colburn NH (1993). PCR-direct sequencing of a GC-rich region by inclusion of 10% DMSO: application to c-jun. Biotechniques. 15(3): 372–374.

 

Turner SL, Jenkins FJ (1995). Use of deoxyinosine in PCR to improve amplification of GC-rich DNA. Biotechniques. 19(4): 48–52.

 

Weissensteiner T, Lanchbury JS (1996). Strategy for controlling preferential amplification and avoiding false negatives in PCR typing. Biotechniques. 21(6): 1102–1108.