Research Article

Taxonomic Divergence of Medically Important and Toxigenic Aspergillus minisclerotigenes from Aspergillus flavus

Amna Shoaib*, Zoia Arshad Awan and Naureen Akhtar

Institute of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.

Received | November 15, 2019; Accepted | December 26, 2019; Published | December 29, 2019

*Correspondence | Amna Shoaib, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Shoaib, S., Awan, Z.A. and Akhtar, N., 2019. Taxonomic divergence of medically important and toxigenic Aspergillus minisclerotigenes from Aspergillus flavus. Journal of Innovative Sciences, 5(2): 53-58.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jis/2019/5.2.53.58

Keywords | Mold, Extrolites, Section Flavi, ITS, Toxigenicity

1. Introduction

Various toxigenic strains of Aspergillus section Flavi produce lethal aflatoxins (G1, G2, B1 and B2) in agricultural commodities (Ismaiel and Papenbrock, 2015) and are a frequent cause of infections in humans and animals (Elad and Segal, 2018). The section Flavi included 33 species, and the species relationship within the section is still unclear. The classical means for the identification of these species still primarily depend on cultural and morphological traits. However, it is often tricky to differentiate these species because the phenotypic differences are not divergent and are easily ostentatious by the surroundings and are also mystified by the high degree of intra- and interspecies variations (Lee et al., 2004). Among different species within section Flavi, A. minisclerotigenes exhibited a close phylogenetic relationship with A. flavus.

A. flavus is an extremely competitive cosmopolitan, notorious plant pathogen with wide host range, which has been initially described two centuries ago (Link, 1809). A. flvaus produces only produce B type, but there are also reports indicated the production of G type aflatoxins toxin as well (Frisvad et al., 2019). A. minisclerotigenes has been described 10 years back (Pildain et al., 2008), and is present in Central, East and Southern Africa and Australia (Probst et al., 2014). It can grow on many substrates like maize, almond, groundnut and spices and produce both B and G aflatoxins (Makhlouf et al., 2019).

For food safety purposes, correct species identification is of high importance and by using a polyphasic strategy based on the combination of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics may contribute to the differentiation of toxigenic Aspergillus species within Flavus group. The current study was aimed to employ a polyphasic strategy that included phenotypic as well as genomic criteria (based on ITS and ISSR analysis) to discriminate the A. minisclerotigenes from A. flavus.

 

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Isolation and identification

Soybean (Glycine max) and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) seeds from storage house, Lahore Pakistan during 2014, were found contaminated by morphologically similar molds. These seeds after surface sterilization with Clorox for one minute thoroughly washed with distilled water and incubated on moist blotter paper for 5 days at 27 °C. The grown spores were transferred to Malt Extract Agar (MEA) and Czapek Dox Agar (CZA) media and incubated for 3-4 days at 30 °C. The pure cultures were used for pathogen identification using macroscopic and microscopic features (Pildain et al., 2008).

2.2 Extrolite analysis

Isolated pathogens were preliminary characterized for their aflatoxigenicity based on emission of blue or green fluorescence after UV light excitation at 365 nm after growth on coconut cream agar (CCA) medium (Lin and Dianese, 1976).

A portion of CCA medium (6-7 cm) without fungal mycelium was cut and put into the 250 mL of Erlenmeyer flask filled with 50 mL of chloroform, incubated at 27 °C in shaking incubator at 200 rpm for 3 hours. Chloroform contents were filtered (Whatman No. 1) and separated into separate bottles. Extracts were allowed to dry at 35 °C for 5 days and dissolved into 2 mL of commercial methanol and aflatoxins of different isolates were saved at 4°C for qualitative analysis of aflatoxins by thin–layer chromatography (Guezlane-Tebibel et al., 2013).

Both strains were analyzed by spotting crude extract (55 μL) of aflatoxins along with the standard of AFBs (AFB1 and AFB2). The TLC plates used were coated with silica gel 60 F254 on aluminum sheet, 20 x 20 cm. TLC plates were developed in chloroform and acetone (90:10, v/v) solvent system (Reddy et al., 2004). The mobile phase was allowed to run 3/4 of the TLC plate. The plates were dried in the dark and then observed under UV light at 365 nm and samples spots were compared with standard aflatoxins spotted on the same plate.

2.3 Genetic analysis

Method of Weigand et al. (1993) was used for the isolation of genomic DNA from fungal species. Using genomic DNA as a template, ITS1/ITS4 [ITS1 forward (5΄-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3΄) and ITS4 reverse primer (3΄-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-5΄)] regions of the genome were amplified (White et al., 1990). The amplified fragments were separated in 1% agarose gel by electrophoresis. PCR products were purified by using a PCR purification kit (Enzynomics) and the fragments were sequenced in both orientations from Macrogen, Korea by using ITS forward and reverse primers. Three primers P01, P02 and P03 were used for ISSR amplification (Table 1) and the amplified PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis and analyzed.

 

Table 1: ISSR primers to amplify fungal DNA.

Primer name	Primer sequence
P1	5΄- AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GG -3΄
P2	5΄- GAG AGA GAG AGA GAG AT -3΄
P3	5΄- GAG AGA GAG AGA GAG AC -3΄

 

3. Results and Discussion

Two post-harvest fungal strains of A. flavus group named A. minisclerotigenes and A. flavus were subjected to a polyphasic approach for authentic identification.

3.1 Morphological characterization

The colonies of A. miniseclerotegenious were dull green to greyish green in color and yellow at reverse on MEA (Figure 1a and c Am), 50–65 mm in diameter without zonation and displayed sclerotia production, while colonies on CZA attained a diameter of 30-40 mm and sclerotia were present (Figure 1b and d Am). Uni and biseriate conidial heads bearing long conidiophores (0.9-1.2 mm) and globose vesicles (25-40 µm). The size of metulae and phialides were 5-8 µm with 8-12 µm, respectively, while globose conidia (3.5-5 µm diameter) were pale green or olive green and smooth-walled to echinulate (Figure 1e-f).

A. flavus colonies were 50-60 mm in diameter (without zonation) and exhibited sclerotia production on MEA (Figure 1a and c Af). On CZA medium, fungal colonies were slow-growing, attained diameter of a 30-40 mm (without zonation), having sclerotia, that were heavily produced in the center of each colony (Figure 1b and d Af). Conidial heads were typically radiate, splitting into several poorly defined columns. Subglobose to globose (25-45 µm) vesicles were hyaline, while both metulae and phialides were present. Metulae with 6.5-10 × 3-4.5 µm dimensions completely covered vesicle surface, however, phialides were 8-12 × 3-5 µm in size. Subglobose to globose (3.5-4.5 µm) Conidia were pale green and conspicuously echinulate (Figure 1h-j).

 

A vial of a pure culture of A. miniseclerotegenious (FCBP-1353) and A. flavus (FCBP-0529) were deposited in the First Fungal Culture Bank of Pakistan.

3.2 Aflatoxins production

The culturing of both strains on CCA medium revealed that both Aspergillus species were capable of producing aflatoxins AFBs (Figure 2). Aflatoxins analysis on TLC also confirmed that A. minisclerotigenes (FCBP-1353) and A. flavus (FCBP-0529) were toxinogenic with consistent mycotoxigenic profile. Both were produced AFBs (AFB1 and AFB2) and showed clear bands on the TLC plate under UV light (Sultan and Magan, 2010) (Figure 3).

 

 

 

 

The BLAST results revealed 100% identity of A. minisclerotigenes FCBP1353 to the 8 strains including G5 (KF841549.1), E76 (JX456215.1), E74 (JX456193.1), E44 (JX292091.1), E21 (JX292090.1), CS5 (JF412778.1), NRRL 29002 (JF412775.1), CS2 (JF412776.1) and some other A. minisclerotigenes strains.

3.3 Genetic analysis

The obtained nucleotide sequence of PCR product of both species were sent for DNA sequencing and identified as 551 bp of ITS region of A. minisclerotigenes and 536 bp of A. flavus (Figure 4). The ITS sequence of A. minisclerotigenes and blast results in Figure 5 also showed 100% identity to the 8 strains of A. minisclerotigenes available in GenBank including G5 (KF841549.1), E76 (JX456215.1), E74 (JX456193.1), E44 (JX292091.1), E21 (JX292090.1), CS5 (JF412778.1), NRRL 29002 (JF412775.1), CS2 (JF412776.1) and some other A. minisclerotigenes strains. Likewise, A. flavus (FCBP–0529) blast analysis showed 100% identity with more than 25 strains including KJ473711.1, KJ013417.1, KF753952.1, KF656712.1, KF723010.1, KJ123911.1, GU172440.1, GU076485.1, KF031021.1 and some other A. flavus in GenBank (Figure 6). The nucleotide sequence of A. minisclerotigenes (FCBP-1353) A. flavus (FCBP-0529) were deposited to GenBank under the accession no. KJ564033 and KJ999747, respectively. The uniformity of ITS fragment size in several fungal groups builds nucleotide sequencing of ITS fragments obligatory to expose interspecific, and in some cases, also intraspecific variation (Hinrikson et al., 2005; Inglis and Tigano, 2006). The ITS region was very functional in resolving taxonomic difficulties in many fungal genera as verified by Driver et al. (2000) and Inglis and Tigano (2006). Hinrikson et al. (2005), revealed that the small variation in band size probably made ITS an unreliable parameter for separating Aspergillus species. Unlike ITS, ISSR profile has significant importance as an assisting tool for identification, genetic diversity analysis and differentiation among strains (Batista et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2013). ISSR analysis has also been shown usefulness in population genetics, epidemiological surveys and ecological studies of A. flavus (Batista et al., 2008). Amplification of ISSR with three primers confirmed (Figure 4) genetic differences between A. minisclerotigenes and A. flavus (Hatti et al., 2010).

 

The BLAST results revealed 100% identity of A. flavus (FCBP0529) to the more than 25 strains including S19 (KJ473711.1), BC-212 (KJ013417.1), LPSC 1183 (KF753952.1), PTN13 (KF656712.1), KVCET2 (KF723010.1), G49 (KJ123911.1), UPM A8 (GU172440.1), A2 (GU076485.1), KAR-8 (KF433946.1) and J8M-40 (JN226905.1), PW2961 (KF562204.1), PW2953 (KF562196.1), MDU-5 (KC914096.1), JP44MY8 (KF031021.1) and some other A. flavus strains.

 

4. Conclusions

In the current study, high relatedness between two medically important strains of A. flavus group concluded that the process of differentiating them needs an under-species classification accomplished by a number of different tactics including morphological basis, amplified ITS fragment, ISSR molecular markers, which is actually a supplementary tool for genetic characterization and could be useful in distinguishing between strongly correlated species or strains.

 

Acknowledgment

Authors are thankful to the University of the Punjab for providing funds to accomplish this research work.

 

Author’s Contribution

Amna Shoaib: Supervised research and wrote the manuscript.

Zoia Arshad Awan: Performed experiments and collect the data.

Naureen Akhtar: Supervised research and wrote the manuscript

 

References

Batista, P.P., Santos, J.F., Oliveira, N.T., Pires, A.P.D., Motta, C.M.S. and Luna-Alves Lima E.A., 2008. Genetic characterization of Brazilian strains of Aspergillus flavus using DNA markers. Genetics and Molecular Research, 7: 706–717. https://doi.org/10.4238/vol7-3gmr422

Dhingra, O.D. and Sinclair, J.B., 1995. Basic plant pathology methods, 2nd ed. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.

Driver, F., Milner, R.J. and Trueman, J.W.H., 2000. A taxonomic revision of Metarhizium based on a phylogenetic analysis of rDNA sequence data. Mycological Research, 104: 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756299001756

Elad, D. and Segal, E., 2018. Diagnostic aspects of veterinary and human aspergillosis. Frontier in Microbiology, 9: 1303. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01303

Frisvad, J.C., Hubka, V., Ezekiel, C.N., Hong, S.B., Nováková, A., Chen, A.J., Arzanlou, M., Larsen, T.O., Sklenář, F., Mahakarnchanakul, W. and Samson, R.A., 2019. Taxonomy of Aspergillus section Flavi and their production of aflatoxins, ochratoxins and other mycotoxins. Studies in Mycology. 93: 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2018.06.001

Frisvad, J.C., Skouboen, P. and Samson, R.A., 2005. Taxonomic comparison of three different groups of aflatoxin producers and a new efficient producer of aflatoxin B1, sterigmatocystin and 3-O-methylsterigmatocystin, Aspergillus rambellii sp. Nov. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 28: 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2005.02.012

Guezlane-tebibel, N., Bouras, N., Mokrane, S., Benayad, T. and Mathieu, F. ,2013. Aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus section Flavi isolated from marketed peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) in Algiers (Algeria). Annals of Microbiolog, 63: 295–305. oi: 10.1007/s13213-012-0473

Hatti, A.D., Taware, S.D., Taware, A.S., Pangrikar, P.P., Chavan, A.M. and Mukadam, D.S., 2010. Genetic diversity of toxigenic and non-toxigenic Aspergillus flavus strains using ISSR markers. International Journal of Current Research, 5: 61–66.

Hinrikson, H.P., Hurst, S.F., Lott, T.J., Warnock, D.W. and Morrison, C.J., 2005. Assessment of ribosomal large-subunit D1–D2, internal transcribed spacer 1, and internal transcribed spacer 2 regions as targets for molecular identification of medically important Aspergillus species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 43: 2092–2103. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.5.2092-2103.2005

Inglis, P.W. and Tigano, M.S., 2006. Identification and taxonomy of some entomopathogenic Paecilomyces spp. (Ascomycota) isolates using rDNA–ITS sequences. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 23: 132–136. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572006000100025

Ismaiel. A.A. and Papenbrock J., 2015. Mycotoxins: producing fungi and mechanisms of phytotoxicity. Agriculture, 5: 492–537. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture5030492

Lee, C.Z., Liou, G.Y. and Yuan, G.F. 2004. Comparison of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus oryzae by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Botanical Bulletin- Academia Sinica Taipei, 45: 61–68.

Lin, M.T. and Dianese, J.C. 1976. A coconut-agar medium for rapid detection of aflatoxin production by Aspergillus Spp. Phytopathology, 66: 1466–1499. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-66-1466

Link, H.F., 1809. Observationes in ordines plantarum naturales. Magazin der Gesellschaft Naturforschenden Freunde Berlin, 3: 3–42.

Makhlouf, J., Carvajal-Campos, A., Querin, A., Tadrist, S., Puel, O., Lorber, S., Oswald, I.P., Hamze, M., Bailly, J.D. and Bailly, S., 2019. Morphologic, molecular and metabolic characterization of Aspergillus section Flavi in spices marketed in Lebanon. Scientific Reports, 27: 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41704-1

Pildain, M.B., Frisvad, J.C., Vaamonde, G., Cabral, D., Varga, J. and Samson, R.A., 2008. Two novel aflatoxin–producing Aspergillus species from Argentinean peanuts. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 58: 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65123-0

Probst, C., Bandyopadhyay, R. and Cotty, P.J., 2014. Diversity of aflatoxin-producing fungi and their impact on food safety in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 174: 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.12.010

Reddy, C.S., Reddy, KR.N., Kumar, R.N., Laha, G.S. and Muralidharan, K., 2004. Exploration of aflatoxin contamination and its management in rice. Indian Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 34: 816–820.

Sultan, Y. and Magan, N., 2010. Mycotoxigenic fungi in peanuts from different geographic regions of Egypt. Mycotoxin Research, 26: 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-010-0048-5

Weigand, F., Baum, M. and Udupa, S., 1993. DNA Molecular Marker Techniques. Technical Manual. No.20. International Center For Agricultural Research in the Dry Area. Aleppo, Syria.

White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. and Taylor, J.W., 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, eds. Innis, MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp. 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

Zhang, C.S., Xing, F.G., Selvaraj, J.N., Yang, Q.L., Zhou, L., Zhao, Y.J. and Liu, Y., 2013. The effectiveness of ISSR profiling for studying genetic diversity of Aspergillus flavus from peanut-cropped soils in China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 50: 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2013.03.046