Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

NARC-2019; A High Yielding Medium Duration Groundnut Variety Suitable for Commercial Cultivation in Pakistan

PJAR_35_1_172-180

Research Article

NARC-2019; A High Yielding Medium Duration Groundnut Variety Suitable for Commercial Cultivation in Pakistan

Nazakat Nawaz1, Nasir Mahmood Cheema2*, Malik Muhammad Yousaf3, Muhammad Jahanzaib1, Mubashir Ahmad Khan1 and Muhammad Munir4

1Oilseeds Research Program, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan; 2Crop Sciences Division, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan; 3Arid Zone Research Institute, Bahawalpur, Pakistan; 4Wheat Research Program, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Abstract | A high yielding medium duration Virginia semi spreading decumbent-2 groundnut line PG-1090 (BARD-479xICGV-87387) was developed at Oilseed Research Program, National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Islamabad. The line was evaluated along with six other promising lines and checked across the country. Selection following pedigree method was continued up to F5 generation. The generations, F2 to F5 were raised for consecutive selection as single plant progeny rows along with parents. PG-1090 being medium duration showed overall higher mean yield (4912 kg ha-1) in preliminary, advance, national uniform yield and on-farms trials compared to other lines and check cultivars BARD-479 and Golden. Its attributes include 70% shelling, 100-kernel weight 66g, 20-pods length 58 cm, oil content 53% and protein content 28%. It was also evaluated under natural field condition to check its potential and tolerance against fungal disease and insects. The subject line is rated as moderately resistant to fungal attack. At the same time, it is 10 to 15 days earlier than check varieties i.e. BARD-479 and Golden. PG-1090 has been approved by concerned authorities as a new variety with the name NARC-2019 for cultivation in rain-fed as well as irrigated areas of Pakistan.


Received | December 09, 2021; Accepted | March 14, 2022; Published | March 30, 2022

*Correspondence | Nasir Mahmood Cheema, Crop Sciences Division, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan; Email: cheemanm_786@yahoo.com

Citation | Nawaz, N., N.M. Cheema, M.M. Yousaf, M. Jahanzaib, M.A. Khan and M. Munir. 2022. NARC-2019; a high yielding medium duration groundnut variety suitable for commercial cultivation in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 35(1): 172-180.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2022/35.1.172.180

Keywords | Groundnut, Hybridization, Medium duration, Variety, Yield

Copyright: 2022 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



Introduction

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is cultivated in over 100 countries with an estimated area of 26 million hectares (mha) with a total of 44 million metric (M) tons world production. Its average yield is approximately 1,655 kgha-1 (FAOSTAT, 2017). Two continents (Asia and Africa) produce almost 58.3% and 31.6%, respectively, comprising about 90% of the world’s total production. China is the highest producer with 16.6 M tons while India and Nigeria produce 6.6 M tons and 3.4 M tons, respectively (FAOSTAT, 2017). In Pakistan, it is grown on an area of 91.1 thousand hectares with annual production of 74.8 thousand tons and average per hectare dry pods yield of 821.1 kg ha-1 (GoP, 2017). It is given great priority all over the world because of its beneficial characters. It is considered as a dense nutritious food in Ghana with high capability to generate income for producers and healthier life for consumers. The crop recorded high scores for nourishment, quality, affordability, acceptability, integrity, along with business/investment interest (Anim-Somuah et al., 2013). Ground nut is given pinnacle as a crop in Malawi and Tanzania for broadening the horizons of the country’s economy and has been incorporated in the national investment plan and national agricultural development strategy (Anonymous, 2014). It is also used directly because of its rich nutritional characteristics and higher percentages of oil content (46.70%), protein (22.0%), carbohydrate (10.0%) and minerals (3.0%) (Patra et al., 2011). The haulms of groundnut are important source of animal feed and high in crude protein as reported by Tolera (2008) and Yami et al. (2008) that crude protein values of 11.4% for groundnut haulm as compared to 5.6% of sorghum stover and can serves as supplements. Positive live weight gains were observed in sheep when supplemented with groundnut haulm (Abdou et al., 2011).

Besides, groundnut being a leguminous crop, fixes atmospheric nitrogen and maintains soil fertility as it adds significant amounts of symbiotic nitrogen to fields and cropping-system (Mokgehle et al., 2014). Groundnut is considered as cash crop and is regularly traded locally, and globally which funds significantly to rural communities cash income and national economy as well. It is a drought tolerant crop and appropriate for crop rotation in semi-arid areas. The average yield of ground nut is far away from its potential yield and more than 70% of potential yield has not been achieved yet (Hatam and Abbasi, 1994). Development of new varieties in field crops has significant role to enhance their yields (Khan et al., 2016). Improved varieties play a vital role and yield of groundnut crop can be increased from 30% to 89% with high yielding varieties (Reddy et al., 1993). There is, always a need to develop and promote improved varieties producing high yield with good quality characteristics (Naeem-ud-Din et al., 2012; Raut et al., 2010). The groundnut crop is self-pollinated crop in general but a bit out crossing occurs in it. The natural out crossing measured in groundnut is 0.27% and 0.99% reported during 1969 and 1970 respectively (Sneath et al., 1973). Though hybridization is main procedure in plant breeding to create genetic variability but in case of groundnut, things are not so simple. The major purpose of the study was to develop a high yielding, early maturing variety with good food nutrients for ground growing farmers of Pakistan.

In the present study, the results of evaluation trials of medium duration groundnut entries over years has been presented leading to the identification of high yielding Virginia decumbent-2 growth habit groundnut variety NARC-2019 (PG-1090) suitable for commercial cultivation in Pakistan.

Materials and Methods

Advance line PG-1090 was developed from the cross of groundnut varieties BARD-479 and ICGV-87387. The cross(x) was attempted during the year 2000 at Oilseed Research Program, National Agricultural Research Center (NARC), Islamabad. Entry BARD-479 (Barani Agricultural Research and Development) is a high yielding, long duration, semi-spreading, large seeded Virginia type variety, while entry ICGV-87387 is a high yielding, medium duration, bunch type, medium seeded with compact pods. These entries were received from ICRISAT, India. Crossing of these two lines was made following hybridization pedigree method for developing a new line PG-1090. The F1 generation was raised and consecutive selections were made up to F5 as single plant progeny rows along with parents from 2002 to 2005. Selections were made on the basis of semi spreading, spreading and bunch type plant, leaf size, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and disease reaction under natural rain-fed conditions. In F5 generation uniform promising lines were selected and their traits were confirmed on the basis of desired agronomic characters. Entry PG-1090 having semi-spreading nature was then evaluated in preliminary and advance yield trials during 2006 and 2007 and 2009 and 2010 respectively with row to row and plant to plant spacing of 45 cm and 10 cm. Then it was tested in National Uniform Yield Trials at six locations across the country viz., National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad, Barani Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Chakwal, Groundnut Research Station (GRS), Attock, Oilseed Research Institute (ORI), Faisalabad, Agricultural Research Station (ARS), Karak, Agricultural Research Institute (ARI), Mingora Swat, and Agricultural Research Institute (ARI), Quetta during the years 2011 and 2012. It is important to mention that during 2011 one location ORI, Faisalabad was included in National Uniform Yield Trials on their request but was dropped during 2012 because of non-conducive environment for ground nut production. During 2012, ARI, Swat was included in trials because of conducive environment and also a growing area for groundnut in Pakistan. Majority of locations’ soils were sandy to loam with more sand ingredients. The soil types are given in Table 14. While the weather data of all the locations during 2011 & 2012 is given in Table 12 and Table 13. For NUYT, seven entries including PG-1090 were planted in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Four rows of 4 meter length of each entry were planted keeping row-to-row and plant-to-plant spacing of 45 cm and 10 cm, respectively. A basal dose of NPK fertilizer @ 20, 80 and 50 kg ha-1 was applied at the time of planting. Gypsum @ 500 kg ha-1 was applied at flowering to get better pods development. Then PG-1090 was tested on larger plot size of 90 meters squares during the years 2013 to 2016 at different locations of Chakwal and Attock districts i.e. the promising groundnut growing areas. Agronomic studies were also conducted on sowing dates i.e., 1st and 15th April; 1st May, 15 May ;1st June, 15 June and 1st July,15 July, row and plant spacing (30cm x 10cm; 30cm x 15cm; 30cm x 20cm and 45cm x10cm; 45cm x 15cm; 45cm x 20cm and 60cm x 10cm; 60cm x 15cm; 60cm x 20cm) and NPK fertilizer trials with different doses of (0-0-0 kg ha-1, 20-40-0 kg ha-1, 30-60-0 kg ha-1, 20-80-20 kg ha-1, 20-80-50 kg ha-1 and 30-80-100 kg ha-1) during the years 2011 and 2012. Oil content (%) was appraised at maturity by the method Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectro-photometer (Anonymous, 1995). For determining the protein, Bunchi Auto Kjeldahl model K-370 was used. The disease aspect data was also recorded as Tikka disease is major disease of groundnut in Pakistan. The yield data collected at harvest were analyzed statistically by using Least Significant Difference (L.S.D) test at 5% level of probability (Steel and Torrie, 1980).

Results and Discussion

Among the twenty entries evaluated in preliminary yield trials PG-1090 showed the highest mean dry pods yield of 4912 kg ha-1 as compared to check variety BARD-479 with mean dry pods yield of 3510 kg ha-1. Table 1 depicts that per hectare yield is 40%

 

Table 1: Preliminary Yield Trials conducted at NARC, Islamabad.

S. No

Entries

2006 (yield kg ha-1)

2007 (yield kg ha-1)

Mean (kg ha-1)

Increase/decrease over check (%)

1

PG-1090

5230

4593

4912

+40

2

BARD-479

4031

2989

3510

---

3

PG-1091

4068

3507

3788

+08

4

PG-1092

5294

4528

4911

+40

5

PG-1093

4223

2396

3310

-06

6

PG-1094

3617

2440

3029

-14

7

PG-1095

3608

2507

3058

-13

8

PG-1096

4384

2721

3553

+01

9

PG-1097

4935

3158

4047

+15

10

PG-1098

5005

4709

4857

+38

11

PG-1099

5325

4878

5102

+45

12

PG-1100

5581

4100

4841

+38

13

PG-1101

4028

3579

3804

+08

14

PG-1102

4089

2854

3472

-01

15

PG-1103

3713

1333

2523

-28

16

PG-1104

6037

5254

5646

+61

17

PG-1105

1455

3601

2528

-28

18

PG-1106

3663

3363

3513

-01

19

ICGV-93095

3136

4938

4037

+35

20

ICGV-93104

2846

2330

2580

-26

L.S.D (0.05)

808

466

C.V (%)

11.33

8.08

 

Table 2: Advance Yield Trials conducted at NARC, Islamabad.

S. No

Entries

2009 (yield kg/ha)

2010 (yield kg/ha)

Mean (kg/ha)

Increase/decrease over check (%)

1

PG-1090

4422

3495

4000

+12

2

BARD-479

3852

3298

3575

---

3

PG-1102

3657

3812

3735

+04

4

PG-1100

3789

3268

3529

-01

5

PG-1041

3129

3487

3308

-07

6

PG-1136

4046

3608

3827

+07

7

PG-1137

3215

4155

3685

+03

8

PG-1141

2797

3874

3336

-07

9

PG-1143

3435

3869

3652

+02

10

PG-1144

2871

3873

3372

-06

L.S.D (0.05)

714

288

C.V (%)

11.82

4.58

 

Table 3: Dry pods yield (kg ha-1) of national uniform groundnut yield trials, 2011.

Entries

NARC, Islamabad

ORI

Faisalabad

BARI, Chakwal

GRS, Attock

ARI,

Quetta

ARS, Karak

Mean (kg ha-1)

Increase over checks (%)

Golden

2198

1446

3151

3036

1892

1527

2208

PG-1090 gave 24 and 21% higher yields over check varieties Golden and BARD-479, respectively

PG-1166

3522

1444

3762

2972

2092

1388

2530

04CGO02

2795

1099

4951

3671

2017

1850

2731

PG-1144

3680

1364

3215

2382

2124

2266

2505

BARD-479

2431

1874

3055

2936

2092

1203

2265

PG-1090

3776

1469

4340

2931

2017

1850

2731

PG-1137

2346

1110

3440

1993

2106

740

1956

L.S.D (0.05)

513

N.S

416

444

N.S

545

C.V (%)

7.02

20.67

8.78

8.89

48.64

19.81

 

Table 4: Dry pods yield (kg ha-1) of national uniform groundnut yield trials, 2012.

Entries

NARC Islamabad

Mingora Swat

BARI Chakwal

GRS, Attock

Sariab Quetta

ARS Karak

Mean (kg ha-1)

Increase over checks (%)

PG-1090

3875

1619

809

1279

1506

3416

2084

PG-1090 gave 7 and20% higher yields over check varieties BARD-479and Golden, respectively

PG-1137

3127

1896

1296

1308

1558

2616

1967

BARD-479

3071

1575

1458

1184

1623

2766

1946

PG-1144

3273

1666

1111

1283

1555

2500

1898

04CGO02

2995

1896

1444

1327

1530

2366

1926

PG-1166

3370

1619

1142

1394

1587

2300

1902

Golden

3016

1709

1296

1438

1530

1466

1743

L.S.D (0.05)

315

N.S

251

N.S

72

N.S

C.V (%)

5.37

34.72

11.55

11.11

2.60

30.29

 

Table 5: Performance of PG-1090 at different locations under rain-fed conditions.

Year

Locations

PG-1090 (yield kg ha-1)

BARD-479 (yield kg ha-1)

Golden (yield kg ha-1)

Increase over check BARD-479 (%)

Increase over check Golden (%)

2013

Mari (Attock)

2335

2003

2066

17

13

2014

Nila (Chakwal)

2550

2051

2093

24

22

2015

Bhegal (Chakwal)

2400

1879

1961

28

22

2016

Hazro (Attock)

1886

1565

1690

21

12

Average

2293

1875

1953

22

17

 

higher as compared to check BARD-479 which is popular variety of Pothwar region of Pakistan. The new variety PG-1090 was tested in advance yield trials as a pre-requisite for variety approval purpose.

It is important to mention that the variety again produced the maximum mean dry pod yield of 4000 kg ha-1 which is 12% higher over check variety BARD-479 (Table 2). After testing in preliminary and advance yield trials, its testing was started country wide under National Uniform Yield Trials at six locations i.e. Islamabad, Swat, Chakwal, Attock, Quetta and Karak. On an average of all six locations, PG-1090 performed out rightly better than other varieties and dry pod yield was the highest mean dry pods yield of 2731 and 2084 kg ha-1 during the years 2011 and 2012, respectively. The yield was 21% and 20% higher than the Check. However, maximum production was obtained at Chakwal with 4355 kg ha-1 followed by PG-116 and PG-1137. Minimum production was obtained at Faisalabad location showing that its environment is not suitable for groundnut production, however, at Faisalabad its production was higher than the other varieties. As regards the production, Entry PG-1090 was found to have a clear edge over check varieties and showed 21 to 24 and 7 to 20% higher yield over best check varieties BARD-479 and Golden (Tables 3, 4 and Figures 3, 4). As a last check measure, the variety under discussion was tested at farmer’s field at four locations on large plots for connective four years in traditional groundnut growing areas i.e. Mari (Attock), Hazro (Attock), Nila

 

 

 

 

(Chakwal) and Bhegal (Chakwal).Combine results of four years indicated that candidate variety (PG-1090) produced 17 to 22% higher yield over check varieties Golden and BARD-479, respectively (Table 5). After testing and proving that PG-1090 has extra mile production than the prevailing varieties, agronomic trials for different sowing dates, row and plant spacing and fertilizer application were conducted for two years during 2013 and 2014. Sowing date trials were started from 1st April to 15th July to assess the best sowing date for its cultivation while harvesting was made in the month of September. Data indicated that 15th April is the best sowing date with maximum production of 2196 kg ha-1 and 2542 kg ha-1 during 2013 and 2014, respectively. However, sowing can be carried out up to 1st June with slight yield reduction (Table 6). As regards the row spacing, 45 x 15cm is the best for maximum production, however, 45 x 10cm and 45 x 20cm are also appropriate with slight yield loss (Table 7 and Figure 2). In agronomic trials nutrient application is much important, hence, fertilizer trials with six different doses were conducted having NPK @ 20-40-0 to 20-80-50 and 30-80-100kg ha-1, respectively. The results showed that best fertilizer dose is 20-80-50 NPK with maximum yields using appropriate inputs (Table 8 and Figure 1). Pod and Kernel characters like shelling percentage, 100g Kernel weight and 20cm pod length was also better than both check varieties BARD-479 and Golden (Table 10). Over and under fertilization can affect the net economic results. Earliness of any crop depends on the early flower initiation. Flowers are the basic reproductive unit which plays. Pivotal role for enhancing yields of all seed crops Kaba et al. (2014). Information regarding flowering is very important in selection for improvement Lim and Gumpil (1984). Early onset of flowering is a basic component of early maturity and the first 25 flowers developed mature pods Baily and Bear (1973). Statistical analysis of the data showed that days to 50% flowering were significantly affected by varieties (Table 9). Lowest days to flowering were recorded for PG-1090, PG-1102, PG-1136 and PG-1143 while maximum days were reported for PG-1137 and PG-1141. Craufurd et al. (2000) reported that some genotypes of groundnut commenced flowering from 26-34 days after planting. Variances in days to flowering may be due to its genetic makeup as confirmed by Ishag (2000).

 

Table 6: Effect of different sowing dates on the yield of Line PG-1090.

Sowing dates

Dry pods yield

(kg ha-1) 2013

Dry pods yield

(kg ha-1) 2014

First April

1875

2240

15th April

2196

2542

First May

1865

2259

15th May

1841

2135

First June

1808

2059

15th June

1814

1964

First July

1665

1722

15th July

1740

1813

L.S.D (0.05)

88

211

C.V (%)

2.71

5.77

 

Table 7: Effects of row and plant spacing on the yield of Line PG-1090.

Row and plant spacing (cm)

Dry pods yield (kg ha-1) 2013

Dry pods yield (kg ha-1) 2014

30x10

1811

1963

30x15

1938

1883

30x20

2207

1778

45x10

2463

2187

45x15

2478

2448

45x20

2304

2333

60x10

1965

2045

60x15

1421

2098

60x20

2129

1943

L.S.D (0.05)

396

215

C.V (%)

11.00

6.00

 

Oil percentage and protein content are the most important features of oilseed crops especially groundnut. Results showed that PG-1090 has 3% higher oil content than both the check varieties while it has even 2% higher protein content as compared to checks showing its superiority in qualitative characters also (Table 10). Disease susceptibility is another important feature for the sustainability of variety in field. Hence, PG-1090 was screened under field conditions for important fungal disease of groundnut (Cercospora personata) along with the check varieties.

 

Table 8: Effects of NPK fertilizers on the yield of Line PG-1090.

Treatments N-P-K (kg ha-1)

Dry pods yield (kg ha-1) 2013

Dry pods yield (kg ha-1) 2014

0-0-0

1915

1899

20-40-0

2084

2068

30-60-0

2285

2233

20-80-20

2514

2400

20-80-50

3160

2585

30-80-100

3152

2316

L.S.D (0.05)

70

366

C.V (%)

4.89

8.94

 

Table 9: Days to flower and 50% flowering data.

S. No.

Variety

Days to flower initiation (Mean)

Days to 50% flowering (Mean)

1

PG-1041

31

33

2

PG-1141

33

35

3

BARD-479 (check)

35

37

4

PG-1136

29

31

5

PG-1100

29

31

6

PG-1090 (NARC-2019)

28

30

7

PG-1143

29

31

8

PG-1102

27

29

9

PG-1137

33

35

10

PG-1144

29

31

 

Table 10: Pods and kernel characters of groundnut entry PG-1090 as compared to checks.

Characters

PG-1090

Golden (check)

BARD-479 (check)

Shelling (%)

70

68

66

100-kernel weight (g)

66

61

61

20-pods length (cm)

58

58

57

Protein (%)

28

26.

26

Oil content (%)

53

50

50

 

Table 11: Disease data of the Line PG-1090 under Natural Field Conditions at NARC, Islamabad.

Lines

Disease reaction (0-9 scale)

PG-1090

3 MR*

BARD-479 (check)

4 S**

Golden (check)

4 S

*MR (Moderately Resistant); **S (Susceptible).

 

The data showed that under 0-9 disease scale, its rating was 3MR as compared to check varieties having 4MR, so the variety under discussion is found to be moderately resistant to Tikka disease (Table 11). So, the candidate line was proved a high yielding with high nutritional value and tolerant to major disease through its good performance in all agronomic trials as given in (Tables 6, 8 and 9).

 

Table 12: Temperature and rainfall of different locations year 2011 (Degree Celsius).

Months

Location

Jan-uary

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

Sep-tember

Octo-ber

No-vember

De-cember

Islamabad high

20

20

31

36

42

41

38

38

35

33

29

23

Low

2

5

10

12

20

24

24

22

20

12

8

2

Rainfall

21.9

281.56

121.26

154.91

111.14

89.24

205.42

229.89

121.2

88.8

15.6

1.3

Attock high

22

23

32

38

45

44

39

38

38

37

29

40

Low

1

6

9

12

19

24

23

24

20

12

9

0

Rainfall

23

285.91

121.76

143.32

95.39

71.65

190.17

213.01

146

83.4

27.3

2

Chakwal high

20

20

31

36

42

41

38

38

35

33

29

23

Low

2

5

10

12

20

24

24

22

20

12

8

2

Rainfall

17.8

245.78

99.75

125.02

86.11

75.33

180.09

249.62

133.8

75.6

13.8

1.4

Karak high

3

6

16

19

38

38

36

36

32

31

22

18

Low

0

4

16

17

16

16

17

20

16

9

0

1

Rainfall

27.2

238.15

57.49

67.79

14.30

0.0

9.3

27.84

18.70

3.1

27.6

1.5

Mingora high

3

6

16

20

38

38

36

36

32

30

22

18

Low

0

4

16

18

16

16

17

20

16

10

0

1

Rainfall

17.99

53.69

63.54

81.81

41.4

72.04

122.7

42.91

240.6

39.7

53.3

14.2

Faisalabad high

20

22

31

40

43

42

38

38

34

34

28

24

Low

7

10

15

18

23

20

23

23

23

18

15

6

Rainfall

0.2

97.6

10.04

43.24

47.38

35.36

83.7

93.57

155

5.7

1.2

0

Quetta high

16

17

27

32

37

38

38

39

32

31

24

18

Low

-2

-3

2

7

13

16

20

19

12

6

3

-5

Rainfall 26.3, 220.15, 52.99, 65.32, 16.3, 0.03, 12.3, 36.11, 17.6, 3, 8.9, 0.8

 

Table 13: Temperature and rainfall of different locations year 2012 (Degree Celsius).

Months

Locations

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

Sep-tember

Oct-ober

Novem-ber

De-cember

Islamabad high

20

20

31

36

42

41

38

38

35

33

29

23

Low

2

5

10

12

20

24

24

22

20

12

8

2

Rainfall

55.02

108.7

65.4

179.7

89.63

17.93

95.37

157.24

95.55

34.6

9.1

96.5

Attock high

22

23

32

38

45

44

39

38

38

37

29

40

Low

1

6

9

12

19

24

23

24

20

12

9

0

Rainfall

54.53

111.5

71.6

214.6

90.81

18.2

61.59

126.19

87.69

37.6

7.6

101

Chakwal high

20

20

31

36

42

41

38

38

35

33

29

23

Low

2

5

10

12

20

24

24

22

20

12

8

2

Rainfall

37.41

72.2

55.6

133.9

71.52

16.52

85.07

137.47

85.69

29.1

8.3

72.1

Karak high

3

6

16

19

38

38

36

36

32

31

22

18

Low

0

4

16

17

16

16

17

20

16

9

0

1

Rainfall

46.35

71.1

21.8

86.3

14.6

0.2

3.25

5.1

20.76

0

10.1

42.3

Mingora high

3

6

16

20

38

38

36

36

32

30

22

18

Low

0

4

16

18

16

16

17

20

16

10

0

1

Rainfall

16.82

39.8

81.1

85.4

134

73.4

145.7

102.17

194.06

37.3

28

132.7

Faisalabad high

20

22

31

40

43

42

38

38

34

34

28

24

Low

7

10

15

18

23

20

23

23

23

18

15

6

Rainfall

20.65

21.2

17.8

79.2

14.8

7.8

10.77

64.87

102.82

10.8

0.3

16.6

Quetta high

16

17

27

32

37

38

38

39

32

31

24

18

Low

-2

-3

2

7

13

16

20

19

12

6

3

-5

Rainfall 41.62, 69.5, 20.1, 99.6, 15.4, 0.5, 5.1, 4.9, 19.8, 0, 5, 41.

 

Table 14: Soil types of all the locations used for testing of groundnut material in NUYT.

Locations

Soil texture

FAO classification

USDA classification

NARC, Islamabad

Sandy loam 

Haplic yermosols

Typic camborthids

BARI, Chakwal

Sandy loam to loam

Haplic yermosols

Typic camborthids

GRS Attock

Sandy loam to loam

Haplic yermosols

Typic camborthids

ORI, Faisalabad

Sandy clay loam

Haplic yermosols

Typic camborthids

ARS, Karak

Sandy clay

Haplic yermosols

Typic camborthids

Mingora, Swat

Sandy

Haplic yermosols

Xerollic calciorthids

Sariab, Quetta:

Silty clay loam

Haplic yermosols

Typic camborthids

 

Hence, NARC-2019 (PG-1090) is a high yielding groundnut candidate medium duration variety which was approved by variety evaluation committee, PARC and Punjab seed council, Lahore for commercial cultivation in Pakistan.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Medium duration high yielding Virginia decumbat-2 growth type variety NARC-2019 (PG-1090) was developed based on consistently significant superior pod yield across locations, and seasons with 10 - 15 days earlier maturity than existing varieties BARD-479 and Golden. It has yield potential of over 4300 kg ha-1 with an average yield of 2400 kg ha-1. It has more oil content as well as protein content showing its qualitative superiority over other lines. At the same time, it possesses moderate resistance against Tikka Disease (Cercospora personata L.) and less defoliation at harvest. Hence, it is suited for general cultivation in all the groundnut growing areas of Pakistan with higher yield and higher nutrition.

Novelty Statement

The study under this paper is first and novel study to develop and approve a groundnut variety with high production potential with high quality characteristics for commercial cultivation in Pakistan.

Author’s Contribution

All the authors helped in different tasks like designing, data collection, making write up, reference collection and draft reading for finalization of the paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Abdou, N., I.V. Nsahlai and M. Chimonyo. 2011. Effects of groundnut haulms supplementation on millet stover intake, digestibility and growth performance of lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 169(3–4): 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.07.002

Anim-Somuah, H., S. Henson, J. Humphrey and E. Robinson. 2013. Strengthening agri-food value chains for nutrition: Mapping value chains for nutrient-dense foods in Ghana. IDS Evidence Report No 2, reducing hunger and undernutrition.

Anonymous, 1995. Official methods of analysis (12th Ed). William Storwertzled, A.O.A.C. Publications, Washington, D.C. pp. 506-508.

Anonymous, 2017. Government of Pakistan, Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan Ministry of Food, Security and Research, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

Anonymous, 2014. Investment Projects. Ministry of Trade and Industry, Government of Malawi. (Google Scholar).

Baily, W.K. and J.E. Bear. 1973. Components of earliness of maturity in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L). J. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Assoc., 78(1- 2): 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021398

Craufurd, P.Q., T.R. Wheeler, R.H. Ellis, R.J. Summerfield and P.V.V. Prasad. 2000. Escape and tolerance to high temperature at flowering in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge, 135(4): 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859699008394

FAOSTAT, 2017. FAOSATAT, statistical data base. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organizations of the United Nations. Visited on 29/05/2017.

Hatam, M., and G.Q. Abbasi. 1994. Oilseeds crops in crop production book. National Book Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 357.

Holden, J.H.W. and J.T. Williams. 1984. Crop genetic resources, conservation and evaluation. George Alien and Unwin, London.

Ishag, H.M., 2000. Phenotypic and yield response of irrigated groundnut cultivar in a hot environment. Exp. Agric., 36: 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700003021

Kaba, J.S., F.K. Kumaga and K. Ofori. 2014. Effect of flower production and time of flowering on pod yield for peanut (Arachis hypogaea L) genotypes. J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 7(4): 2319-2372. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-07434449

Khan, M.A., M.H. Ammar, E.H. Magdadi, S.A. Alfaifi, M. Farooq and S.S. Alghamdi. 2016. Field performance and genetic diversity of chickpea genotypes. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 18(4): 683-688. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0151

Lim, E.S., and J.S. Gumpil. 1984. The flowering, pollination and hybridization of groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L). Pertanika, 7(2): 61-66.

Mokgehle, S.N., F.D. Dakora and C. Mathews. 2014. Variation in N2 Fixation and N contribution by 25 groundnut Arachis hypogaea varieties grown in different agro-ecologies, measured using N natural abundance. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 195: 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.05.014

Naeem-ud-Din, M. Tariq, M.K. Naeem, M.F. Hassan, G. Rabbani, A. Mahmood and M.S. Iqbal. 2012. Development of BARI-2011, a high yielding, drought tolerant variety of groundnut Arachis hypogaea with 3-4 seeded pods. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 22(1): 120-125.

Patra, P.S., A.C. Sinha and S.S. Mahesh. 2011. Yield, nutrient uptake and quality of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea) kernels as affected by organic sources of nutrient. Ind. J. Agron., 56: 237-241.

Raut, R.D., L.K. Dhaduk and J.H. Vachhani. 2010. Studies on genetic variability and direct selections for important traits in segregating materials of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Int. J. Agric. Sci., 6(1): 234-237.

Ready, L.J., S.N. Nigam, P. Subrahmanyam and R.G.S. Ready. 1993. Registration of ICGV-86590 peanut cultivar. Crop Sci., 33: 357-358. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300020043x

Sneath, P.H.A. and R.P. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco W.H. Freeman. pp. 573.

Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. 2nd Ed. McGraw Hill Book. Co. Inc New York, U.S.A.

Tolera, A., 2008. Feed resources and feeding management: A manual for feedlot operators and development workers. Ethiopia SPS-LMM - Texas Agricultural Experiment Station (TAES)/TAMU, Addis Ababa

Yami, A., E. Sheep and R.C. Merkel. 2008. Sheep and goat production handbook for Ethiopia sheep and goat productivity improvement programme, Addis Ababa (Ethiopia), Eng. Merkel.

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research

December

Vol.36, Iss. 4, Pages 297-403

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe