Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Light and Scanning Electron Microscopic Studies on Eustrongylides exciscus Larvae (Nematoda: Dioctophmida) from Channa punctatus Bloch from India




Light and Scanning Electron Microscopic Studies on Eustrongylides exciscus Larvae (Nematoda: Dioctophmida) from Channa punctatus Bloch from India

Neelima Gupta

Centre of Excellence Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, MJP Rohilkhand University, Bareilly 243 006, India


Fourth stage larvae of Eustrongylides exciscus were recovered from the abdominal cavity, musculature and ovaries of Channa punctatus (prevalence 24%, intensity 2 to 18 per fish). Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) were conducted to demonstrate the surface anatomy of the worm. The worm is slender, elongated and cylindrical. The mouth is slit-like, surrounded by two lateral rows of somatic papillae, cephalic end was conical with 12 labial papillae arranged in two circles of 6 papillae each. Scanning electron microscopy on attachment structures revealed that the inner papillae had narrow bases and spine-like apices, the outer ones had wide bases and nipple like apices encircled by a conspicuous ring and embedded in the body wall. The body of the worm was striated and grooved assisting flexibility to the worm during movement. Attempts to develop the larvae in ducks Anas platyrynchas by feeding were unsuccessful up to 17 days post infection suggesting that ducks were not the final hosts of the worm. Channa punctatus serves as a paratenic host for Eustrongylides.

Article Information

Received 23 August 2015

Revised 21 January 2018

Accepted 22 March 2018

Available online 27 November 2018

Key words

Eustrongylides, Channa, Anas, Scanning electron microscopy, Papillae.


* Corresponding author:

0030-9923/2019/0001-0159 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2019 Zoological Society of Pakistan


Eustrongylides is a nematode causing Eustrongylidosis. Due to its large size, it is commonly known as the Big Red Worm. Eustrongylides infection has been reported from various regions of the world including North and South America, Europe, Eastern Africa, China and Turkey (Paperna, 1974; Moravec et al., 2003; Salgado-Maldonado et al., 2004; Saraiva et al., 2006; Saffari et al., 2007). These nematodes have attracted attention because they are widely distributed in various geographical regions and exhibit a great potential for transmission and pathogenicity. However, most of the previous research on various species of the genus has been limited to faunal investigation in different geographical sites and host species, as well as the pathology in their host (Measures, 1988a, b; Asakawa et al., 1997; Junker et al., 2006; Mihalca et al., 2007). Information on the life cycle of Eustrongylides is limited. It is very complicated and is completed in different stages. In fishes, the parasites are conspicuous as long, red, coiled larvae located in the body cavity or embedded in the muscles (Mitchum, 1995; Overstreet, 2003). In humans who have consumed raw or uncooked fish, Eustrongylides produces gastritis and intestinal perforations (Deordorff and Overstreet, 1991; Cole, 2009).

There are a few reports of Eustrongylides from India. Ali (1971) reported a new species, E. indicus from an Indian bird. However, Kalyankar (1974) for the first time described the larval stage of the worm in the body cavity of Macrones seenghala from Nanded. The pathological effects caused by Eustrongylides larvae on serum LH level and histology of gonads of Clarias gariepinus were reported by Mir et al. (2012) recording a significant decrease (50%) in the gonadotropin hormone (LH) in the blood. Histopathological studies of testes revealed disorganized testicular structure, germinal epithilium was disrupted and reduction in spermatozoa was reported by the authors. Histology of infected ovaries showed the appearance of interfollicular spaces, degeneration of follicular wall tissues and their egg envelops were ruptured. Jaiswal et al. (2013) reported the ecological dynamics of E. tubifex in silver whiting, Sillago sihama from the central west coast of India, Goa.

Morphological details of the parasite examined under light microscopy are significant for morphological studies but in fishes, Eustrongylides are present in their larval condition, therefore identification of the reproductive structure of the parasite is not possible. SEM represents an important tool for studying the detailed surface topography of the parasite and its ability to provide three dimensional images with high magnification allow a better understanding of the spatial relationships among surface structures. This technique is therefore acquiring importance for validating species and demonstrating differences between populations or races (Gibbons, 1986; Cynthya et al., 2012). The shape, number, and distribution of papillae on the cephalic end are important characters used in taxonomy and classification. The development of the larvae in the definitive host provides information on the life cycle pattern. Therefore, the present study was designed to study the morphological and topographical characteristics of Eustrongylides larvae collected from Channa punctatus and further attempts to develop the larva in domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domestica L.) in order to test their viability as potential hosts of the worm.


Materials and methods

Collection and maintenance of host

During spring 2012-2013, 250 live samples of the fishes (Channa punctatus Bloch, 1793 Perciformes: Channidae) weighing 25-45 g were collected from local ponds, river Ramganga of Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India (28.35ºN; 79.42º E). The fishes were transported to the Centre of Excellence laboratory of M.J.P. Rohilkhand University in large containers and maintained in aquaria under proper aeration. They were fed on commercial pellets (Toya fish food containing fish and soya bean meal, wheat and rice flour and vitamins A, C, D3 and E till sacrificed. They were treated in accordance with the guidelines of the local ethics committee.

Light microscopic preparation

Prior to sacrifice, fishes were anesthetized and abdominal cavity, digestive tract and other organs were thoroughly examined for the presence of Eustrongylides larvae by examining the tissues under a Magnus Zoom Stereo Trinocular microscope with Magnus Image Projection System, TS100-F (LED type). The parasites collected were fixed in 70% ethanol or 4% formaldehyde. They were instantly examined by clearing in lactic acid, optically examined microscopically by clearing in glycerine or cleared in pure glycerine or lactophenol (Kakar and Bilqees, 2016), optically and examined microscopically. by clearing in glycerin. Drawings were made and photographs taken under Olympus BX 53 microscope with DIC attachment, digital camera and CELLSENS imaging software system.

Scanning electron microscopic preparation

For SEM analysis, the specimens were washed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), fixed in 2% cold glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 15-20 hours at 4°C in a refrigerator, washed 2-3 changes in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, post fixed in 1% osmium tetra oxide for 1 hour, dehydrated through graded series of ethanol (70% to 100%) for 10 minutes each at room temperature and dried to critical point. Specimens were glued to metal specimen stubs with double sided tape, rotary-coated with gold mixed with palladium using a sputter coater (NeoCoater 100-240V) for 30 sec, examined in a scanning electron microscope (Neo JCM-6000) at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. The results were recorded, saved on computer and visualized on LCD screen.

Life cycle

The life cycle is indirect, requiring two intermediate hosts. It commences with the egg stage which are always inside a poop. The first stage larva develops within the eggs that are shed in bird faeces. The eggs fall in water and can live for 2⅓ year before being eaten up by freshwater oligochaetes/aquatic worms serving as the first intermediate host. Eggs hatch within the oligochaetes and convert into the second and third stage larva formed inside the eggs. To continue its life cycle, the worm needs a fish to eat the aquatic worm. The larvae remain inside the fish body serving as the second intermediate host and the third stage larvae become encapsulated on the internal surface areas of the fish and develop into the infective fourth-stage larvae till eaten by predatory birds, the final hosts. The cycle maybe elaborated by predatory fish feeding on the infected fish thereby serving as paratenic/transport hosts and these ultimately being fed upon by birds. Once inside a bird, the worm can complete its life cycle. Herons, egrets and sometimes eagles act as the final hosts. In the bird’s stomach, the larva becomes an adult, attains maturity and is capable of shedding eggs in about 10-17 days post infection.

In fish, unencysted larvae of these parasites migrate under the skin and in the muscles causing extensive inflammation and necrosis. Encystation occurring in the viscera namely the liver, spleen or gonads causing severe pathologic changes in the adjacent tissue (Paperna, 1974).

Attempts to develop Eustrongylides (IV stage larva) in domestic ducks (Anas platyrynchas)

One year old domestic ducks, Anas platyrynchas (n=6) were purchased from Bareilly market, maintained outdoors in large metal cages and were provided fresh water and duck feed daily during experimentation.

Ducks were randomly separated into two groups, 4 in the test group and two in the control group. Ducks in the test group were fed with duck feed and 7 Eustrongylides larvae each collected from the intestinal tract of C. punctatus whereas those of the control group were fed only on duck feed. From day 2 post infection (PI) onwards, the faecal sample of each duck was examined. On day 17 PI, the remaining ducks in both groups were killed and all internal organs and body cavity of the ducks were examined for the presence of Eustrongylides.



The infected fish showed bloody patches on its surface. On autopsy, the gastrointestinal tract of C. punctatus revealed the presence of the highly coiled nematode parasite in the abdominal cavity, musculature and ovaries (Fig. 1). The prevalence was 24% and the number of parasites per fish ranged from a 2 to 18 (Fig. 2). Parasite body tapering with dense transverse striation of cuticle, anterior end pink, remaining part of body red with deepest colouration in mid-anterior part of body. The reproductive organs of the parasite were not developed, based on its morphology, the parasite is identified as IV stage larva of Eustrongylides excisus.


Light microscopy studies on the worm and SEM on attachment structure (papillae) were performed. All measurements are given in micrometers.

Light microscopy

The larvae were studied under Olympus BX 53 microscope with DIC attachment, digital camera and CELLSENS imaging software system. The parasite was bright red in colour, length of body was 38.5-45.8 mm, maximum width 3.06 mm, oesophagus 10.20 mm. Anterior end somewhat narrow. Three cuticle layers were visible at the anterior and posterior extremities of the worm, apparently the second and third stage cuticles were retained (Fig. 3A-D).


Scanning electron microscopy

SEM revealed two lateral rows of somatic papillae extending along the body. The cephalic end was conical and showed 12 labial papillae arranged in two circles of 6 papillae each, including 2 lateral, 2 sub ventral, and 2 sub dorsal (Fig. 4A). The inner papillae had narrow bases and spine-like apices (Fig. 4B, C), whereas the outer ones had wide bases and nipple like apices (Fig. 4D). The latter were encircled by a conspicuous ring and securely embedded in the body wall (Fig. 5A). Just above these papillae, sensilla were apparent which are probably sensory in nature (Fig. 5B). The body of the worm was striated (Fig. 5C) and under high magnification, appeared to be grooved providing flexibility to the worm during movement (Fig. 5D).



Eustrongylides is one of the four genera of adenophorean nematodes belonging to the superfamily Dioctophymatoidea, family Dioctophymatidae Railliet, 1915, family Eustrongylinae Chitwood and Chitwood, 1937 (Anderson et al., 2009). According to Measures (1988b), only two valid species of the genus Eustrongylides Jagerskiold, 1909, E. ignotus Jagerskiold, 1909 and E. tubifex (Nitzsch and Rudolphi, 1819) Jagerskiold, 1909, are known to occur in the New World; the definitive hosts of the former are piscivorous birds belonging to the orders Ciconiiformes and Pelecaniformes and that of the latter are Gaviiformes, Anseriformes, Ciconiiformes and Podicipediformes birds.

Three species of Eustrongylides are accepted as valid taxa: E. tubifex Jagerskiold, 1909, E. ignotus Jagerskiold, 1909 and E. excisus Jagerskiold, 1909 (Xiong et al. 2009). The labial papillae of the inner circle are larger than those of the outer circle in E. ignotus and E. excisus whereas the reverse is true for E. tubifex. In E. ignotus males, the outer perimeter of caudal sucker has a wide cuticular hem and the inner perimeter lacks cuticular projections, a ventral cleft is absent in the caudal sucker whereas in E. excises males, the outer perimeter of the caudal sucker has a reduced cuticular hem, the inner perimeter of caudal sucker has a row of cuticular projections and a deep ventral cleft is present on the caudal sucker (Measures, 1988b). However, as the detected worms were larvae, therefore, these characters could not be ascertained and further transmission experiments are recommended.



Earlier studies on larval Eustrongylides mainly focused on the number and arrangement of papillae which were used as diagnostic characters. However, the present studies on scanning electron microscopy indicated that the inner papillae had narrow bases and spine-like apices, the outer ones had wide bases and nipple like apices encircled by a conspicuous ring and embedded in the body wall. The body of the worm was striated and grooved assisting flexibility to the worm during movement. These observations are an advancement on the earlier reported light microscopic studies.

The present SEM studies on Eustrongylides larvae would be useful in future studies as this is the first such report from India and the details of the larva described herein would assist future related workers.

The present survey shows that larval nematodes frequently parasitize fishes of Rohilkhand, Uttar Pradesh, India. Often it is difficult to identify larvae to species level in fish without feeding them to birds. Moreover, the degree of host specificity of nematode larvae to their fish hosts has been regarded to be lower than that of adult nematodes and have been reported to occur in phylogenetically distant fish orders (Moravec, 1994; Moravec et al., 1995). However, during the present studies, the larvae were specific to Channa punctatus whereas C. striatus, Heteropneustes fossilis and Clarias batrachus collected from the same sites did not show any infection. Numerous larvae present in fish hosts maybe harmful (Moravec et al. 1995).

Larvae are quite large in size and they often infect fishes with high intensity, therefore the hosts abdomen is bloated (Yanong, 2011). Consuming infected fish, predators can be infected and serve as paratenic host when they are fed upon by birds (Cole, 2009). According to Moravec et al. (1995) larvae of the genus Eustrongylides belong to the group of the most pathogenic parasites. By the character of their cephalic papillae the larva of the present material resemble E.excisus, but their possible appurtenance of this species should be confirmed experimentally. Our attempts to infect domestic ducks (Anas platyrynchos) with Eustrongylides from C. punctatus were unsuccessful. suggesting that ducks are not suitable definitive hosts for this species.

Eutrophication and warm water temperatures (20-30°C) are optimum conditions for the survival of the parasite. Water quality is an important factor as infection in fish is highest where external sources of nutrients or thermal pollution alter the natural environment. Therefore, to check infection, water quality should be improved relative to land-use practices and waste water discharges (Cole, 2009).

The occurrence of nematode larvae in fish is not obligatory for completing its life cycle, however, they appear to be important ecologically by acting as paratenic hosts in causing infection in the definitive host.



Thanks are expressed to the Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India for providing funds (sanction orders no 138/70-4-2011-46(32)/2009 and 150/70-4-2012-46(43)/2010) under the “Centre of Excellence” for conducting research on parasite-fauna of fishes of Rohilkhand.


Statement of conflict of interest

Authors have declared no conflict of interest.



Ali, M.M., 1971. A new species of dioctophimid nematode, Eustrongylides indicus n. sp., from an Indian bird. Riv. Parassitol., 32: 47-50.

Anderson, R., Chabaud, A. and Willmont, S., 2009. Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates. Archival Volumen. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom, ISBN 978-1-84593-572-6.

Asakawa, M., Kimoto, Y. and Murata, K., 1997. First record of Eustrongylides tubifex (Dioctophymatidae) from little grebes, Tachybaptus ruficollis, in Japan. J. Vet. med. Sci., 59: 955-956.

Cole, R.A., 2009. Eustrongylidosis. In: Field manual of wildlife diseases: General field procedures and diseases of birds (eds. M. Friend and J.C. Franson). Biological Resources Division, Information and Technology Report 1999-2001. US Geological Survey. Washington DC, pp. 223-228.

Cynthya, E.G., Monika, I.H. and Cristina, S., 2012. Study of helminth parasites of amphibians by scanning electron microscopy (ed. V. Kazmiruk). Available from:

Deardorff, T.L. and Overstreet, R.M., 1991. Sea food transmitted zoonoses in the United States: the fishes, the dishes, and the worms. In: Microbiology of marine food products (eds. D.R. Ward and C.R. Hackney). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 211-265.

Gibbons, L., 1986. SEM guide to the morphology of nematode parasites of vertebrates. CAB International, United Kingdom, ISBN 085198-569-6.

Jaiswal, N., Upadhyay, S.K., Malhotra, A. and Malhotra, S.K., 2013. Multifacorial etiology of infections by larvae of Eustrongylides tubifex (Nematoda: Dioctophymidae) in silver whiting of the central west of India at Goa. Asian J. biol. Sci., 6: 21-39.

Junker, K., Bain, O. and Boomker, J., 2006. Eustrongylides sp. (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidea) from the stomach of a Nile crocodile, Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti, 1768, in Botswana. Onderstepoort J. Vet., 73: 315–317.

Kakar, A. and Bilqees, M., 2016. Rhabdochona spatulatum, new species (Nematoda: Rhabdochonidae) from the freshwater cyprinid fish, Cyprinion microhpthalmum (Day) in Quetta Division, Pakistan. Pak. J. Zool., 48: 713-721.

Kalyankar, S.D., 1974. First report on Eustrongylides larva (Nematoda, Dioctophymidae) from fish in India. Acta Parasitol. Polon., 22: 331-333.

Measures, L.N., 1988a. Epizootiology, pathology and description of Eustrongylides tubifex (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidea) in fish. Can. J. Zool., 66: 2212-2222.

Measures, L.N., 1988b. Revision of the genus Eustrongylides Jagerskiod, 1909 (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidea) of piscivorous birds. Can. J. Zool., 66: 885-895.

Mihalca, A.D., Fictum, P., Skoric, M., Sloboda, M., Karvemo, S., Ghira, I., Carlsson, M. and Modry, D., 2007. Severe granulomatous lesions in several organs from Eustrongylides larvae in a free-ranging dice snake, Natrix tessellata. Vet. Pathol., 44: 103-105.

Mir, T.A., Kaur, P. and Manohar, S., 2012. Pathogenic effects of nematode parasite Eustrongylides sp. larvae on serum LH level and histology of gonads of freshwater fish, Clarias gariepinus. Rec. Res. Sci. Technol., 4: 24-26.

Mitchum, D.L., 1995. Parasites of fishes in Wyoming. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne, WY.

Moravec, F., 1994. Parasitic nematodes of freshwater fishes of Europe. Academia and Lower Acad. Publishers, Prague and Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp. 473.

Moravec, F., Nie, P. and Wang, G.T., 2003. Some nematodes of fishes from central China, with the redescription of Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) fulvidraconis (Camallanidae). Folia Parasitol., 50: 220-230.

Moravec, F., Vivas-Rodrigues, C., Scholz, T., Vargas-Vazquez, J., Mendoza-Franco, E., Schmitter-Soto, J.J. and Gonzales-Solis, D., 1995. Nematodes parasitic in fishes of cenotes (sinkholes) of the Peninsula of Yucatan, Mexico, Part 2, Larvae. Folia Parasitol., 42: 199-210.

Overstreet, R.M., 2003. Presidential address: Flavor buds and other delights. J. Parasitol., 89: 1093-1107.

Paperna, I., 1974. Hosts distribution and pathology of infections with larvae of Eustrongylides (Dioctophymidae, Nematoda) in fish from East African lakes. J. Fish Biol., 6: 67-76.

Salgado-Maldonado, G., Aguilar-Aguilar, R. and Caban-Ascaranza, G., 2004. Helminth parasites of freshwater fishes of the Ayuquila River, Sierra de Manantlan Biosphere Reserve, west central Mexico. Comp. Parasitol., 71: 67-72.

Saraiva, A.D., Rosim, F. and Silva-Souza, A.T., 2006. Nematode parasites of characoid fishes from Brazil. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol., 26: 271-274.

Saffari, M., Mokhayer, B., Khara, H., Nezami, S. and Shafii, S., 2007. Occurrence and intensity of parasites in some bony fish species of Anzali wetland from the southwest of the Caspian Sea. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol., 27: 54-60.

Xiong, F., Wang, G.T., Wu, S.G. and Nie, P., 2009. Development of Eustrongylides ignotus (Nematoda: Dioctophmida) in domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchois domestica (L.). J. Parasiotol., 95: 1035-1039.

Yanong-Roy, P.E., 2011. Nematode (Roundworm) infections in fish. Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Publication Series, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology


Vol. 51, Iss. 6, Pages 1999-2399


Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits

Subscribe Unsubscribe