Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Effect of Oleander Aphid (Aphis nerii Boyer de Fonscolombe) on the Mortality and Biological Parameters of Green Lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea Stephen)

PJZ_52_1_231-237

 

 

Effect of Oleander Aphid (Aphis nerii Boyer de Fonscolombe) on the Mortality and Biological Parameters of Green Lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea Stephen)

Mubasshir Sohail1,2,*, Raza Muhammad1 and Qadeer Ahmed Soomro1

1Plant Protection Division, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tando Jam

2Department of Entomology, University College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha

ABSTRACT

The generalist predator, green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) has a key role in integrated pest management (IPM) strategies for many crop pests. The influence of different prey types has been studied to strengthen the C. carnea. Current in-vitro study was made to figure out the effects of different prey on mortality and certain biological characteristics of C. carnea. The highest mortality rate (66.43±2.13%) was for larvae, which fed upon Oleander aphid, Aphis nerii. Less larval mortality (7.86±2.37%), larval period (164.57±8.16 h), maximum pupal weight (9.86±0.41 mg) and emergence (95.13±2.03%) was observed when C. carnea was provided with eggs of Sitotroga cerealella. Bervicornye brassicae was performed well than A. nerii but was found least successful as compared to eggs of S. cerealella. Both aphid species were significantly good in performance when fed to C. carnea larvae with S. cerealella eggs than their solo effect. Results depicted that mortality factor and life parameters of C. carnea larvae are influenced by its prey type which they fed on. These results of the study could be used to improve the rearing and conservation strategies to increase C. carnea population and their predatory activities.


Article Information

Received 10 October 2017

Revised 22 July 2018

Accepted 16 January 2019

Available online 28 October 2019

Authors’ Contribution

MS developed basic ideas and was also responsible for experiment and theoretical setting, data collection and analysi and writing of manuscript. RMM conducted experiment and provided guidance during writing of manuscript. QAS helped in developing basic ideas, layout, experiment and theoretical setting and provided guidance for writing of manuscript.

Key words

Oleander aphid, Aphis nerii, Chrysoperla carnea, Life parameters, Survival analysis.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2020.52.1.231.237

* Corresponding author: mubasshirsohailroy@gmail.com

0030-9923/2020/0001-0231 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2020 Zoological Society of Pakistan



Introduction

There has been a considerable change in adaptation of protocols in insect pest management (IPM) with the advent of concept of organic farming. Natural enemies play a vital role in ecosystem, posing a valid substitute to, or integration with, other control strategies (McEwen et al., 2007; Javed et al., 2019). So, the development of IPM seeks to upsurge natural control by conservation and preservation of entomophagous fauna (Rogers et al., 2007; Rumpf et al., 1997). Thus, the impact of different management practices on biocontrol agents; needs to be restudied and improved.

The C. carnea is a widespread natural predator of the agroecosystem. It has great potential in IPM of many different crops and non-crop habitats (Duelli, 2001). Generalist predator has played a vital role especially in managing different crop pest (Bompard et al., 2013). Due to quick adoptability against adverse climatic factors, high searching capacity and capability of managing a wide range of insect pests make this insect as a successful predator in agroecosystem (Mansoor et al., 2013). It is widely spread in whole Holarctic, and preferentially feed on aphid but can also consume soft bodied arthropods like whiteflies, mealy bugs, thrips, scales, leafhoppers and few caterpillars (Khan et al., 2010; Syed et al., 2005). This predator has been mass-reared and augmented against several insect pests of European and American countries (Balouch et al., 2016).

Effective mass rearing protocols need to be established, to produce excessive numbers of predatory lacewings. Quantity and quality of prey species are found influential for biology and behavior of C. carnea (Strohmeyer et al., 1998; Thompson and Hagen, 1999). Important considerations while evaluating the potential of a predator, are suitability and fitness of prey for the development of predator for deciding its success rate in ecosystem (Hodek, 1993). Although, C. carnea is found to be a highly aphidophagous predator, but its biology can be overwhelmed by some aphid species. It is documented that Aphis fabae Scopoli was an unsuitable prey for C. carnea, as it caused high larval mortality, the formation of smaller cocoons and lower fecundity (Osman and Selman, 1993). However, Nakamura et al. (2000) reported that Chrysopa pallens cannot develop into an adult on Tetranychus urticae as feed.

Oleander aphid, Aphis nerii Boyer de Fonscolombe (Homoptera: Aphididae) has access to high contents of oleandrin and nerrin in the phloem of plants of Asclepiadaceae and Apocynaceae. These toxic compounds are digested by aphids, sequestered and excreted in honeydew (Malcolm, 1990). Certain prey when consumed by predators, arrest their growth and development, or cause their mortality at an early stage; other are rejected (Panizzi and Parra, 2012). For example, various coccinellids cannot continue their life cycle after consuming A. nerii fed oleander plant, since it possesses the toxic active ingredient oleandrin (Iperti, 1966). This allelochemical makes the prey unpalatable and might be the reason for rejection by some predators (Hodek, 1993).

The current study was planned to analyse the influence of two prey species (A. nerii and B. brassicae) along with Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) eggs on the biology of C. carnea.

 

Materials and methods

The experiments were carried out under controlled laboratory conditions (25±1°C and 60±5% RH) at biological control laboratory, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture (NIA), Tando Jam, during the year of 2017.

S. cerealella culture

S. cerealella culture was maintained on wheat grains. For the purpose, wheat grains were pre-treated and disinfected by Phostoxin® tablets (aluminum phosphide) and then poured into jute sack and were sterilized with boiling water for 2 min. The treated grains were then exposed to sun light to eliminate stored grain mites and other potential pests. After solar exposure, half kilogram of grains were then transferred to each 4 liters (20.5 cm L x 55.8 cm D) glass jars. Freshly laid eggs of S. cerealella (5ml eggs/jar) were properly mixed with grains to each glass jar. After mixing them properly and were kept in controlled laboratory conditions at (25±1°C and 60±5% RH and 15:7 (L:D) hrs). After hatching, young larvae of S. cerealella started feeding on wheat grains till adult emergence. Newly emerge adults were allowed to fed on grains and collected by motorized aspirator and shifted to eggs collecting jars (1L plastic jar with a fine mesh (mesh size = 50) at the bottom). Eggs collecting jars were placed over starch and fresh eggs were collected and further used in experiments.

Rearing of C. carnea

C. carnea eggs were collected from biocontrol lab of Plant Protection Division of Nuclear Institute of Agriculture (NIA), Tando Jam. and placed under cloth cover for hatching. To avoid the cannibalism, individual larvae were shifted in 2 inches polypropylene transparent aerated straw with food (S. cerealella eggs) and placed them in controlled biocontrol laboratory at 25±1°C and 60±5% RH and 15:7 (L:D) hrs till pupation. These tubes were cut out from both sides and shifted on glass Petri plates (9 cm diameter and 1.5 cm height) for adult emergence. On emergence, adults were transferred to insect rearing cage (24.5 x 24.5 x 24.5 cm) with black cloth fitted at the top for egg laying substrate. Adults were provided with an artificial diet (honey, sugar, yeast and distilled water (1:2:1:2)) throughout reproductive phase C. carnea.

Collection of aphid species

During the studies, B. brassicae and A. nerii were regularly collected on daily basis from brassica and oleander plants grown at farm area and the residential colony of NIA, Tando Jam, respectively. The collected species were used as prey for C. carnea.

Effect of prey on larval mortality of C. carnea

Thirty, 2nd instar larvae of C. carnea were collected with fine camel hair brush and individual larvae were shifted into 2 inches polypropylene transparent straw tubes for each treatment. There were five treatments with 30 replication (total 150 larvae were used in the experiment). Five treatments (A. nerii (n=20), B. brassicae (n=20), eggs of S. cerealella (150 mg), A. nerii + eggs of S. cerealella (n=10+75 mg) and B. brassicae + eggs of S. cerealella (n=10+75 mg)) were evaluated for C. carnea larval mortality. Individual C. carnea larvae were fed regularly to avoid starvation. These tubes were placed in an incubator under optimum conditions mentioned above. Mortality was recorded after 12 h interval till pupation.

Effect of prey on life parameters of C. carnea

The above mentioned procedure was recurred to evaluate the effect of different prey on life parameters. Ten, 2nd instar C. carnea were used for each treatment (as mentioned above). 4th instar aphids were removed from population to avoid parthenogenesis. Each C. carnea larva was monitored daily. The remaining aphids and eggs were removed from tubes and were supplied with fresh aphid and eggs till pupation. Each treatment was evaluated in 5 replicates to determine larval duration, percent larval mortality, pupal duration, pupal weight, percent emergence and sex ratio.

Statistical analysis

Experimental data was statically analysed using SAS JMP® Pro 12.2.0 software to evaluate the significant difference between treatments. Survival analysis was performed to analyse the survivability of C. carnea larvae. Log-Rank and Wilcoxon test were used to calculate the difference in the C. carnea larvae survival, between different larval preys.

Furthermore, ANOVA was used to determine the effect of different preys on life parameters like larval duration, percent larval mortality, pupal duration, pupal weight, percent emergence and sex ratio. Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used to compare the means of different response parameters.

 

Results

Survival analysis was used to estimate the expected failure time of C. carnea larvae on providing with different larval preys. Each prey showed a significant difference in overlaying steps of estimated survival function. The highest mortality was recorded on providing C. carnea provided with A. nerii, while minimum mortality was found on S. cerealella eggs. When both (A. nerii and S. cerealella eggs) were provided at the same time, survivability increase and was more than B. brassicae (resulting in 2nd highest mortality). In the case of A. nerii, C. carnea was started dying just after 36 h, while in the case of S. cerealella, first death occured after 60 h of starting up time (Fig. 1).

Accrual time for all treatments was 192 h. It also caution us about their survival even after end of trail time. The corresponding p-value is <0.0001 and thus significant difference was observed in overall survivorship when between larvae provided will different preys (Table II). No significant mortalities were found, when provided with S. cerealella eggs alone or with other aphid species. Summary of the survival plots for C. carnea larvae when provided different prey type in Table I. Table II gives the Chi-square values and p-values for the prey types when subjected to C. carnea larvae.

Significant differences were found in larval duration (F = 5.28, df = 4, P = 0.0024) of C. carnea when provided with five different larval preys (Fig. 2). In the case of A. nerii, maximum hours (197±3.51) were recorded as a larval period. Minimum larval duration (164.57±8.16 h) was observed in the case of S. cerealella eggs. No significant difference was observed in larval period when eggs were provided alone or mix with aphid species.


 

 

Table I.- Summary statistics of survival plot for C. carnea larvae reared in vitro provided with different food sources.

Group

No. failed

No. censored

Mean

Survival (%)

Std. Error

A. nerri

22

8

139.2

26.7

9.50

B. brassicae

10

20

161.2

66.7

6.61

A. nerri + S. cerealella eggs

7

23

156

76.3

5.22

B. brassicae + S. cerealella eggs

6

24

158

80

4.84

S. cerealella eggs

4

26

139.2

86.6

3.49

 

Table II.- Chi-Square approximations for Log-Rank test and Wilcoxon test.

Test

Chi-Square

df

Prob.>Chi-Sq.

Log-Rank

35.682

4

<0.0001*

Wilcoxon

32.566

4

<0.0001*


 

Mortality of C. carnea was recorded at each prey type subject to them. Significant differences were observed among larval prey types when compared for larval mortality (F = 46.67, df = 4, P < 0.0001). Mortality concern was greater (66.43±2.13%) in C. carnea when fed on A. nerii, while lesser fatalities (7.86±2.37%) were observed when provided with S. cerealella eggs (Fig. 3). Except for A. nerri, no significant differences were found in C. carnea mortality at all other prey types.

No impact of prey type was found on the pupal duration of C. carnea (Fig. 4). The pupal period of C. carnea did not differ when fed on different prey types (F = 2.19, df = 4, P = 0.094).

The significant effect was found on the pupal weight when fed five different larval prey types (F = 11.74, df = 4, P < 0.0001). Maximum pupal weight (9.86±0.41 mg) was attained when C. carnea was reared on eggs of S. cerealella. The combination of eggs of S. cerealella with both A. nerri and B. brassicae produced more healthy pupae and attained weight 7.01±1.02 mg and 8.43±0.53 mg, respectively. Minimum pupal weight (4.42±0.43 mg) were recorded, when C. carnea reared on A. nerri solely (Fig. 5).


 

 

Percent adult emergence of C. carnea feeding on the five prey types is shown in Figure 6. Significant differences were found in percent adult emergence (F = 63.98, df = 4, P < 0.0001). the mean comparison showed that C. carnea larvae fed by S. cerealella eggs alone (95.13±2.03%) and combined with aphid species (A. nerii = 73.57±2.67 %; B.brassicae = 84.4±2.50%) had significant more adult emergence than fed alone on aphid species. Minimum adult percentage (33.77±2.9) was recorded when C. carnea fed by A. nerri alone.


 


 

Percent female emergence out of the total adult emergence of C. carnea feeding on the five prey types is shown in Figure 7. There was no significant different (F = 55.94, df = 4, P = 0.2361) found after analysis of variance.

 

Discussion

Although C. carnea is most voracious predator of many species of aphids and is well known as the “aphid lion”, but quality and quantity of larval food is considered important and plays a vital role in successful completion of their growth and development and subsequent adult performance (Nandan et al., 2014). To assess the impact of different larval prey types on mortality and life parameters of C. carnea, a laboratory experiment was conducted. A significant difference was observed in mortality of C. carnea larvae when fed to the various prey types. The difference in the C. carnea larvae survival, between different larval preys was detected using both Log-Rank and Wilcoxon test. Because Log-Rank test gives more weightage to large survival times and is more effective when the ratio of different function in groups being compared is almost constant. It is also called as a force of mortality or mortality rate. While, Wilcoxon test gives more weightage to early survival times and is only the suitable rank test when the error distribution is logistic (Kalbfleisch and Prentice, 1980).

During the studies it was observed that most of the C. carnea larvae were unable to complete their lifecycle when fed on A. nerri alone. Whereas some of them when reached at pupal stage were unable to convert into healthy adults due to lack of appropriate size and weight.

Prior to research, it was supposed that A. nerii, possibly would not accomplish the nutritional requirement, and thus growth and development of C. carnea larvae will be hampered (Gupta et al., 2006). Canard et al. (1984) found that its biology and behavior is highly dependent on the food quality which they fed on. Several studies have been reported that A. nerii to be an unsuitable food for its predator and parasitoid (Snyder et al., 2000; Srivastava, 2003). The finding of our studies depicted that by feeding on eggs of S. cerealella, individuals passed through the larval and pupal stage and emerged into adults successfully. While A. nerii was recorded to be a poor food for C. carnea.

C. carnea growth on A. nerii was poor, regardless of chemical or physical variation among host plant species. When fed eggs of S. cerealella with either of aphid species, virtually all larvae performed better. Successfully developed pupae that had fed only S. cerealella eggs as larvae were approximately double the size that has been fed by A. nerii. Even, larval period was recorded significantly prolonged when provided with A. nerii than other prey types. These findings coincide with the results that some aphid species used as food not only affect the size of their natural enemies but resulted in slower developmental times as compared to larvae fed on near-ideal diet (Snyder et al., 2000).

The ineptness of A. nerii as a prey item was previously reported to affect the performance of predators that feed on them as host plant cardenolides sequestered by A. nerii (Hodek, 1993). Confiscation of host plant toxins in aphids is well explained in research articles, but less is known regarding the way in which herbivores and natural enemies process these toxins (Pasteels, 2007). Some aphid species can be toxic due to the high concentration of nerrin and oleandrin, which digested and then sequestered by aphid and excreted in honeydew (Malcolm, 1990).

 

Conclusion

The high amount of cardenolides, cardiac glycosides, particularly nerrin and oleandrin, were identified to be responsible for the toxicity of A. nerii attained form host plant, Nerium oleander (Rothschild, 1961).Certain prey consumed by a predator doesn’t allow healthy development and perform well. Furthermore, poor nutritive value or toxicity of prey leads in, for example, slow development, decreased fecundity or fertility, low weight or ultimately high total mortality (Hodek, 1993).

More research in the field of diet specificity of aphidophagous predator is necessary. Such studies are needed not only for enhancing our information but mainly for rational integrated pest management, specifically about introduction and augmentation. It is also essential for establishing the rearing protocols of C. carnea regards their artificial food as well. Prey unsuitability may be a cause why some released predators fail to establish or reared in-vitro.

 

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

 

References

Balouch, S., Bukero, A., Nizamani, I.A., Kumbhar, M.I., Rajput, L.B. and Nahiyoon, S.A., 2016. Rearing of adult green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) on different artificial diets in the laboratory. J. Basic appl. Sci., 12: 289-292. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2016.12.44

Bompard, A., Jaworski, C.C., Bearez, P. and Desneux, N., 2013. Sharing a predator: Can an invasive alien pest affect the predation on a local pest? Popul. Ecol., 55: 433-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-013-0371-8

Canard, M., Séméria, Y. and New, T.R., 1984. Biology of chrysopidae, Vol. 27. Springer, The Netherlands.

Duelli, P., 2001. Lacewings in field crops. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511666117.010

Gupta, A.K., Srivastava, S., Mishra, G. and Singh, K., 2006. Survival, development and life tables of two congeneric ladybirds in aphidophagous guilds. Insect Sci., 13: 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2006.00074.x

Hodek, I., 1993. Habitat and food specificity in aphidophagous predators. Biocontr. Sci. Technol., 3: 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583159309355264

Iperti, G., 1966. The choice of oviposition sites in aphidophagous Coccinellidae. In: Ecology of aphidophagous insects (ed. I. Hodek). Academia, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 121-122. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789061936312

Javed, M., Majeed, M.Z., Sufyan, M., Ali, S. and Afzal, M., 2018. Field efficacy of selected synthetic and botanical insecticides against lepidopterous borers, Earias vittella and Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Pakistan J. Zool., 50: 1999-2398.

Kalbfleisch, J. and Prentice, R., 1980. The statistical analysis of failure time data. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.

Khan, P.A., Sayyed, A.H., Aslam, M., Liu, T.X., Razzaq, M. and Ahmed Gillani, W., 2010. Resistance to pyrethroids and organophosphates increased fitness and predation potential of Chrysoperla carnae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J. econ. Ent., 103: 823-834.

Malcolm, S.B., 1990. Chemical defence in chewing and sucking insect herbivores: Plant-derived cardenolides in the monarch butterfly and oleander aphid. Chemoecology, 1: 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240581

Mansoor, M.M., Abbas, N., Shad, S.A., Pathan, A.K. and Razaq, M., 2013. Increased fitness and realized heritability in emamectin benzoate-resistant Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ecotoxicology, 22: 1232-1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-013-1111-8

McEwen, P.K., New, T.R. and Whittington, A.E., 2007. Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press.

Nakamura, M., Nemoto, H. and Amano, H., 2000. Ovipositional characteristics of Lacewings, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephans) and Chrysopa pallens (Rambur) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in the field. Jpn. J. appl. Ent. Zool., 44: 17-26.

Nandan, N., Korat, D. and Dabhi, M., 2014. Influence of different host insect (prey) on biological parameter of Chrysoperla zastrowisillemi (Esben-Peterson). Insect Environ., 20: 40-44.

Osman, M. and Selman, B., 1993. Suitability of different aphid species to the predator Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Univ. J. Zool., 12: 101-105.

Panizzi, A.R. and Parra, J.R., 2012. Insect bioecology and nutrition for integrated pest management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11713-31

Pasteels, J.M., 2007. Chemical defence, offence and alliance in ants–aphids–ladybirds relationships. Popul. Ecol., 49: 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-006-0023-3

Rogers, M.A., Krischik, V.A. and Martin, L.A., 2007. Effect of soil application of imidacloprid on survival of adult green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), used for biological control in greenhouse. Biol. Contr., 42: 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.05.006

Rothschild, M., 1961. Defensive odours and Mullerian mimicry among insects. Ecol. Ent., 113: 101-123.

Rumpf, S., Hetzel, F. and Frampton, C., 1997. Lacewings (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae and Chrysopidae) and integrated pest management: enzyme activity as biomarker of sublethal insecticide exposure. J. econ. Ent., 90: 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/90.1.102

Snyder, W.E., Joseph, S.B., Preziosi, R. and Moore, A.J., 2000. Nutritional benefits of cannibalism for the lady beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) when prey quality is poor. Environ. Ent., 29: 1173-1179. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-29.6.1173

Srivastava, S., 2003. Influence of six aphid prey species on development and reproduction of a ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata. Biocontrol, 48: 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024762822955

Strohmeyer, H.H., Stamp, N.E., Jarzomski, C.M. and Bowers, D.M., 1998. Prey species and prey diet affect growth of invertebrate predators. Ecol. Ent., 23: 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00101.x

Syed, A.N., Ashfaq, M. and Khan, S., 2005. Comparison of development and predation of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on different densities of two hosts (Bemisia tabaci, and Amrasca devastans). Pak. Entomol., 27: 231-234.

Thompson, S. and Hagen, K., 1999. Nutrition of entomophagous insects and other arthropods. Acadamic Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012257305-7/50069-2

To share on other social networks, click on P-share. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

December

Vol. 51, Iss. 6, Pages 1999-2399

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe