Biochemical and Histopathological Changes in Immune and Non Immune Broilers after Inoculation of Field Infectious Bursal Disease Virus

Beenish Zahid1,*, Asim Aslam2, Zafar Iqbal Chaudhry2 and Raheela Akhtar2

1Department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

2Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted to compare the biochemical and histopathological changes in response to pathogenic field infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). The Bursa of fabricius was collected from poultry flocks of Punjab Pakistan for isolation of IBD virus by inoculating in embryonated chicken eggs through chorioallantoic membrane. The two hundred birds were divided into 4 groups A, B, C and D). The birds in group A were commercial broiler chicks having maternal derived antibodies and were challenged with IBDV field isolate at the rate of 0.1ml of EID50 (virus titer 105.50/100μl) on 2nd week of age through eye drops. Group B specific antibody negative (SAN) chicks were challenged with same dose at 2nd week of age. While the group C and D was unchallenged control containing commercial and SAN chicks. The Blood samples were collected from group A, B, C and D on 3rd, 5th and 7th day of post infection for biochemical analysis. The Albumin and total protein values were significantly low (P<0.05) in infected groups A and B as compared to control groups C and D on 5th and 7th day. The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were significantly (P<0.05) high in infected groups A and B. On 3rd, 5th and 9th day five birds from each group were slaughtered and histopathological lesions observed in bursa, spleen and thymus and compared with control. Mild to severe hemorrhages and lymphocytic depletion, follicle necrosis, leukocytic infiltration, cyst formation and fibrous tissue proliferation at medullar region of thymus and bursa were observed. These results indicated that pathogenic field IBDV caused the serum biochemical changes by damaging the liver and kidney tissues with histopathological effect on lymphoid organs of chicken.

Article Information

Received 24 August 2016

Revised 31 October 2016

Accepted 26 January 2017

Available online 30 June 2017

Authors’ Contribution

AA and BZ conceived and designed the study and executed serum biochemical tests. ZIC and BZ performed histopathological studies. RA analyzed the data. BZ wrote the article.

Key words

IBDV, Alanine aminotransferase, Aspartate aminotransferase, Albumin, Total protein.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.4.1279.1283

* Corresponding author: bz-leo@hotmail.com

0030-9923/2017/0004-1279 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2017 Zoological Society of Pakistan

INTRODUCTION

 

Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV) also known as Gumboro disease, is highly contagious and immuno-suppressive disease (Okwor et al., 2012). IBD is an acute, highly spreading disease may lead to high mortality rates. Due to the mortality and immunosuppressive effects, the disease has marked economic significance to the poultry sector throughout the world (Rauf, 2011). The IBD etiological agent is double stranded RNA virus having two segments which belongs to the Birnaviridae family and consisted of two serotypes, designated as serotypes 1 and serotype 2 (Carballeda et al., 2011).

Only type 1 serotype is pathogenic for the domesticated chicken. Numerous serotype 1 strains, differing in antigenicity have been identified and classified as classic and variant. Classical virulent strains in chicken, causes severe inflammation of bursa resulted in lymphocytic depletion and bursal atrophy in IBD challenged birds, ultimately causing immunosuppression (Atif et al., 2014). The very virulent strain of IBD virus had 80 % sequence homology with classical IBDV strains (Jackwood et al., 2009).

The damaging effect of virus can be evaluated at organ level, and at the level of cellular alterations. The clinical infection of IBDV based on few factors like type of viral strain, the dose of virus, route of virus entry, presence or absence of maternal antibodies, type of birds and age factors (Muller et al., 2003). The bursa of Fabricius becomes enlarged and shows pale yellow discoloration. Intra-follicular hemorrhages may be found and pin point hemorrhages on the skeletal muscles are usually prominent (Ingrao et al., 2013).

The acute phase of the disease lasts for 6-10 days and is characterized by atrophy of bursa along with depletion of B-cells (Uddin et al., 2012) in bursal follicles, the other lymphoid organs such as spleen and cecal tonsils are also affected. Immunosuppression occurs in clinical and subclinical form where both humoral and cellular immune responses are compromised and thus making birds more vulnerable to other secondary infections and reduced response to vaccination (Musa et al., 2010).

Besides, it exhibits several pathological changes as part of the pathogenesis of the disease which could essentially be explained in biochemical changes in relation to the effect of the virus in several organ among others, liver and kidney (Abidin et al., 2014). The elevation in serum concentration of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at day 3 pi and/or days 5 and 7 pi in the IBD group suggested pathological involvement of liver and kidney which are common sequels in IBDV infection especially following secondary viremia (Tesfaheywet et al., 2012). The objective of present study is to evaluate the pathogenesis of virulent strain of field IBDV by estimating biochemical and histopathological changes produced in commercial broilers (immuned birds) and specific antibody negative chicks (Non immuned birds).

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental design

Two hundred day old broiler chicks were procured and reared under standard housing conditions in University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, the birds were fed with commercially prepared feed. The humoral antibody titer against IBD of reared birds were checked through enzyme linked immunosorbent assay in order to check the status of maternally derived antibodies both in commercial broilers and specific antibody negative (SAN) chicken at 0day. The SAN chicks were serologically negative for IBD. The birds were divided into 4 groups (A, B, C and D), fifty birds in each group. The birds in group A were commercial broiler chicks having maternal derived antibodies and were challenged with IBDV field isolate at the rate of 0.1ml of EID50 (virus titer 105.50/100μl) on 2nd week of age through eye drops (Abdel-Alim and Saif, 2001). Group B SAN chicks were challenged with same dose at 2nd week of age. While the group C and D were unchallenged control containing commercial and specific antibody negative chicks.

Virus isolates

The collected bursa of fabricus field tissue samples were inoculated in 10 day-old embryonated chicken eggs through chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) route for IBDV at 0.2 ml (0.1 ml virus suspension + 0.1 ml antibiotic mixture) of inoculums. For IBDV samples of CAM were collected with PBS (phosphate buffered saline) to prepare 50% suspension and stored at -80°C for further use (Majed et al., 2013). Embryo infectious dose 50 (EID 50) of isolated field infectious bursal disease virus was estimated (Camilotti et al., 2016).

Histopathological examination

On day 3rd, 5th and 9th of post infection, from each group five birds were slaughtered, gross and histopathological lesions on lymphoid organs bursa, thymus and spleen in different groups were observed and tissue samples were preserved in 10% formalin for histopathological study (Subtain et al., 2011).

Collection of sera for biochemical analysis

From each group five birds were selected for blood collection. Blood samples were collected from group A, B, C and D on 3rd, 5th and 7th day of post infection, three mL of blood was collected from birds of each group via jugular vein or intra-cardiac route using a 23 G needle and 3.0 ml syringe. At room temperature collected blood was allowed to clot and serum was separated. The collected serum samples were stored at -20Co till further use (Emadi et al., 2011).

Liver function tests (LFT)

Among LFTs hepatic serum enzyme levels of ALP, AST, ALT, total protein and albumin were analyzed by chemical analyzer (URIT-800) using “Human kit” to determine the changes in their levels as a result of IBD virus (Tesfaheywet et al., 2012).

Statistical analysis

The serum enzyme level data was analyzed statistically through analysis of variance and enzyme values in different treatment groups were compared through duncan’s multiple range test by using SAS (Statistical Analysis Software).

 

RESULTS

 

In the present study bursal histological changes observed in group A were minimal, in group B mild changes observed in lymphoid organs whereas in group C and D no pathological changes observed. Mild lymphocytic depletion and epithelial cells hyperplasia observed in thymus (Fig. 1A). Congestion and hemorrhages observed in spleen. On 5th day of post infection Moderate histological changes observed in different organs in group A, severe changes observed in group B. Typical histological changes associated with IBDV infection, including lymphoid depletion, necrosis and hemorrhages in bursa (Fig. 1B), infiltration of leukocytic cells and cell debris of necrosed tissues observed in infected organs of IBDV inoculated birds of group B (SAN) chicks.

 

The spleen of group A showed mononuclear cell infiltration and sever congestion on 5th day of postinfection (Fig. 1C). In bursa of group B severe damage included lymphoid follicles atrophy, epithelial cell degradation (Fig. 1D) and leukocytes infiltration on 9th day of postinfection. Severe hemorrhages and lymphoid cell necrosis observed at medullar region of thymus. The bursa of Fabricius of group A on 9th day showed follicular atrophy, cyst formation and fibrous tissue proliferation.

Serum biochemical parameters of ALP, AST, ALT, and total protein and albumin values were evaluated (Table I). On third day of post infection albumin and total protein serum level were significantly (P<0.05) low in group B. Total protein and albumin values were significantly low (P<0.05) in infected groups A and B on 5th and 7th day of post infection as compared to control groups C and D. ALT, AST and ALP values were significantly high in infected groups A and B.

 

DISCUSSION

 

IBD causes the considerable economic losses through high mortality and immunosuppression in poultry. The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the serum biochemical parameters in field Infectious bursal disease virus in broiler chicken including changes in activities of ALT, AST, ALP and concentrations of albumin and total protein, and histopathological changes in immune organ were investigated.

Histopathological lesions were observed in lymphoid organs of infected birds, changes were compared with the control groups. Pathological lesions were scored mild in start, followed by moderate and severe. On third day of post infection mild lymphocytic depletion and hyperplasia of epithelial cells observed in bursa, mild hemorrhages and congestion was observed in thymus correspond to the result reported by (Atif et al., 2014).

 

Table I.- Serum concentration of albumin, total protein, ALT, AST and ALP in different treatment groups on day 3, 5 and 7 post infection.

Days	Groups	Day 3	Day 5	Day 7
Albumin (g/dl)	A	1.59±0.01b	1.32±0.03b	1.09±0.02b
	B	1.51±0.01c	1.41±0.06b	1.06±0.01b
	C	1.71±0.02a	1.73±0.05a	1.75±0.02a
	D	1.68±0.01a	1.74±0.04a	1.78±0.04a
Total protein (g/dl)	A	4.10±0.02d	3.98±0.04c	3.11±0.02d
	B	4.43±0.02c	3.57±0.04d	3.28±0.03c
	C	4.98±0.03b	5.44±0.05a	5.65±0.03a
	D	5.13±0.02a	5.27±0.04b	5.42±0.02b
ALT (u/L)	A	4.50±0.01b	7.12±0.02a	10.30±0.01b
	B	5.16±0.01a	6.75±0.02b	12.59±0.02a
	C	3.52±0.03c	3.65±0.01c	3.79±0.05c
	D	3.48±0.02c	3.57±0.03d	3.82±0.04c
ALP (u/L)	A	204±17.2a	210±5.22b	226±8.63ab
	B	215±4.32a	238±4.58a	254±6.39a
	C	186±3.60a	198±5.87b	206±8.63b
	D	195±4.82a	200±7.22b	218±8.47b
AST (u/L)	A	210±6.46b	307±4.33b	368±4.76b
	B	300±10.3a	353±6.64a	396±6.88a
	C	174±6.05c	179±10.1c	188±10.2c
	D	180±6.68c	180±6.33c	185±7.60c

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase. Values with different superscripts within a column differ significantly (P<0.05). Group A, commercial IBDV infected chicks; Group B, specific antibody negative IBDV infected chicks; Group C, commercial chicks control; Group D, SAN control.

 

IBDV has greater affinity to the lymphocytes of the thymus than the spleen (Zubeedy et al., 2013; Al-Jubori, 2009). The virus destroyed the T lymphocytes thus causes severe immune suppression by destroying both B lymphocytes of bursa of Fabricius and T lymphocytes of thymus and finally failure to optimal response of vaccine (Uddin et al., 2012). On 5th day of postinfection moderate histopathological lesions observed depleted and necrosed B lymphocytes observed at medullar area of bursal lymphoid follicle, depleted lymphocytes replaced by heterophils and reticuloendothelial cells. The immature B-cells is believed to be first site of replication for IBD virus where virus causes damage to B cells in lymphoid follicles of bursa (Chen et al., 2009). The typical histological bursal lesions were similarly reported by (Murmu et al., 2014; Sing et al., 2015) that included moderate to severe lymphoid depletion in bursal follicle, cyst formation, follicular necrosis and hemorrhages formation in follicles.

Serum biochemical parameters like ALT, albumin, total protein, AST and ALP were measured on 3rd, 5th and 7th day of post-infection in infected groups. Albumin and total protein values were significantly (P<0.05) reduced in IBDV infected groups as compared to control groups. Total protein level decreased due to impaired liver function and kidney damage also led to protein loss (Zeryehun et al., 2012). Other causes of hypoproteinemia were anorexia, dehydration and diarrhea in IBDV infected birds. This statement is supported by Kudair and Al-Hussary (2010) who demonstrated that abnormal amount of certain enzyme at intercellular level in blood are result of damage to an organ or tissue. The ALT, AST and ALP values were significantly increased (P<0.05) in IBDV challenged birds. IBDV causing hepatocytes necrosis and rupturing of hepatocytes that elevated ALT values (Abidin et al., 2013). In IBDV infection liver and kidney were adversely affected that leads to increase values of serum enzymes. Similar findings were reported by Abidin et al. (2014) and Roosevien (2006).

 

CONCLUSION

 

The finding of present investigation indicated that serum biochemical changes in field infectious bursal disease virus were consistent with the pathogenicity of IBDV infection. These biochemical changes in IBDV infection are mostly related to damage to liver and kidney. Therefore, these parameters (biochemical changes and histological changes) are essential in clinicopathological assessment and also contribute to understand the pathogenesis of IBD field infection.

 

Statement of conflict of interest

Authors have declared no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES

 

Abdel-Alim, G.A. and Saif, Y.M., 2001. Detection and persistence of infectious bursal disease virus in specific-pathogen-free and commercial broiler chickens. Avian Dis., 45: 646-654. https://doi.org/10.2307/1592906

Abidin, Z., Khan, M.Z., Khatoon, A., Saleemi, M.K., Khan, A. and Javed I., 2013. Ameliorative effects of L-carnitine and vitamin E upon OTA induced haematological and serum biochemical alterations in white leghorn cockerels. Br. Poult. Sci., 54: 471-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.796509

Abidin, Z., Khatoon A., Butt, T.M., Hussain, S., Kanwal, A., Ali, S., and Aziz, A., 2014. Isolation and molecular identification of infectious bursal disease (IBD) virus from commercial poultry: Effects of field isolate on cell mediated immune response and serum biochemical parameters in broilers. Int. J. Innov. appl. Res., 2: 8-20.

Al-Jubori, F.M., 2009. The post vaccinal changes of IBDL and D-78 strains against infectious bursal disease in broiler chickens. M.Sc. thesis, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Atif, N.A., Iftikhar, H., Masood, A. and Fehmeeda, B., 2014. Comparative study of commercially available infectious bursal disease vaccine with egg attenuated live vaccine. Pakistan J. Zool., 46: 959-966.

Camilotti, E., Morase, L.B., Furian, T.Q., Borges, K.A., Morase, H.L.S. and Salle, C.T.P., 2016. Infectious bursal disease: pathogenicity and immunogenicity of vaccines. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 18: 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0148

Carballeda, J.M., Zoth, S.C., Gomez, E., Gravisaco, M.J. and Berinstein, A., 2011. Activation of the immune response against infectious bursal disease virus after intramuscular inoculation of an intermediate strain. Instituto de Biotecnología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Chen, L., Ran, M.J., Shan, X.X., Cao, M., Cao, P., Yang, X.M. and Zhang, S.Q., 2009. BAFF enhances B-cell-mediated immune response and vaccine-protection against a very virulent IBDV in chickens. Vaccine, 27: 1393-1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.12.040

Emadi, M., Jahanshiri, F., Kaveh, K., Hair-Bejo, M., Ideris, A. and Alimon, A.R., 2011. Nutrition and immunity: the effects of the combination of arginine and tryptophan on growth performance, serum parameters and immune response in broiler chickens challenged with infectious bursal disease vaccine. Avian Pathol., 40: 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2010.539590

Ingrao, F., Rauw, F., Lambrecht, B. and van Den BERG, T., 2013. Infectious bursal disease: A complex host pathogen interaction. Dev. Comp. Immunol., 41: 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2013.03.017

Jackwood, D.J., Sommer-Wanger, S.E., Stoute, A.S., Woolcock, P.R., Crossley, B.M., Hietala, S.K. and Charlton, B.R., 2009. Characteristics of a very virulent infectious bursal disease virus from California. Avian Dis., 53: 592-600. https://doi.org/10.1637/8957-061109-Reg.1

Kudair, M. and Al-Hussary, N.A.J., 2010. Effect of vaccination on some biochemical parameters in broiler chickens. Iraqi .J. Vet. Sci., 24: 59-64.

Majed, H.M., Zahid, A.A.H., Kadhim, L.I. and Hasoon M.F., 2013. Conventional and molecular detection of newcastle disease and infectious bursal disease in chickens. J. World’s Poult. Res., 3: 5-12.

Muller, H., Islam, M.R. and Raue, R., 2003. Research on infectious bursal disease: the past, the present and the future. Vet. Microbiol., 97: 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.08.005

Murmu, R., Islam, N., Juli, S.N. and Khan, A.S., 2014. Pathogenicity and immunosuppressive properties of GM-97 strain of infectious bursal disease virus in commercial broiler chickens. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 1: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.v1i1p1-7

Musa, I.W., Saidu, L., Adamu, J., Mbuko, I.J., Kaltungo, B.Y. and Abdu, P.A., 2010. Outbreaks of gumboro in growers in Zaria, Nigeria. Niger. Vet. J., 31: 306–310.

Okwor, E.C., Eze, D.C. and Okonkwo, K., 2012. Serum antibody levels against infectious bursal disease virus in Nigerian village chickens using indirect hemagglutination test. Pak. Vet. J., 32: 286-287.

Rauf, A., 2011. Persistence, distribution and immunopathogenesis of infectious bursal disease virus in chickens. The Ohio State University.

Roosevien, F.N.R., 2006. Molecular characteristics and pathogenecity of infectious bursal disease virus isolated in Malaysia. MVSc thesis. Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Uni Putra Malaysia, pp. 99-132.

Sing, J., Banga, R.S., Sing, N.D., Sing, S. and Leishangthem, G.D., 2015. Histopathological and immunohistochemical diagnosis of infectious bursal disease in poultry birds. Vet. World, 8: 1331-1339. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.1331-1339

Subtain, S.M., Chaudhry, Z.I., Anjum, A.A., Maqbool, A. and Sadique, U., 2011. Study on pathogenesis of low pathogenic avian influenza virus H9 in broiler chickens, Pakistan J. Zool., 43: 999-1008.

Uddin, M.M., Islam, M.S., Basu, J. and Khan, M.Z.I., 2012. Distribution and quantification of lymphocytes in the major lymphoid organs of naturally gumboro infected broilers. Int. J. Morphol., 30: 1585–1589. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022012000400050

Zeryehun, T., Hair-Bejo, M. and Rasedee, A., 2012. Biochemical changes in specific-pathogen-free chicks infected with infectious bursal disease virus of malaysian isolate. Global Vet., 8: 8-14.

Zubeedy, A.L., Shamaun, A.A. and Al-Aalim, A.M., 2013. Histopathological and immune response against infectious bursal disease in chickens vaccinated against newcastle disease. Al-Qad. J. vet. Med. Sci., 12: 66-70.