Review Article

 

A Review on the Potential Effects of Mannheimia haemolytica and its Immunogens on the Female Reproductive Physiology and Performance of Small Ruminants

 

Faez Firdaus Abdullah Jesse1,2*, Mohamed Abdirahman Boorei2, Eric Lim Teik Chung1,3, Fitri Wan-Nor2, Mohd Azmi Mohd Lila4, Mohd Jefri Norsidin2, Kamarulrizal Mat Isa2, Nur Azhar Amira1, Arsalan Maqbool1, Mohammed Naji Odhah5, Yusuf Abba6, Asinamai Athliamai Bitrus7, Idris Umar Hambali6, Innocent Damudu Peter6, Bura Thlama Paul2,6

1Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; 2Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; 3Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; 4Department of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; 5Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Pengakalan Chepa 16100, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia; 6Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maiduguri, PMB 1069 Maiduguri, Borno Nigeria; 7Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Jos, P.M.B 2084 Jos, Plateau Nigeria.

 

Received | March 19, 2020; Accepted | May 27, 2020; Published | June 04, 2020

*Correspondence | Faez Firdaus Abdullah Jesse, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Jesse FAA, Boorei MA, Chung ELT, Wan-Nor F, Lila MAM, Norsidin MJ, Isa KM, Amira NA, Maqbool A, Odhah MN, Abba Y, Bitrus AA, Hambali IU, Peter ID, Paul BT (2020). A review on the potential effects of Mannheimia haemolytica and its immunogens on the female reproductive physiology and performance of small ruminants. J. Anim. Health Prod. 8(3): 101-112.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2020/8.3.101.112

ISSN | 2308-2801

Copyright © 2020 Jesse et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Mannheimia (formerly known as Pasteurella) haemolytica is the causative agent of cattle and sheep pneumonic pasteurellosis (mannheimiosis), which is an infection that causes significant financial losses to the cattle, sheep and goat sectors with climatic and animal management factors participating in their pathogenesis (Zamri-Saad et al., 1994; Chung et al., 2015; Jesse et al., 2019). Pasteurella and Mannheimia species are nonmotile, non-spore-forming, facultatively anaerobic, oxidase-positive and fermentative small gram-negative rods or coccobacilli. Most of them are commensals on the upper respiratory mucous membrane and the digestive tract of both domestic and wild animals (Wilson and Ho, 2013). In its typical clinical form, the disease is enormously infectious, often fatal and has a very severe financial effect on the animal industry (Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008). The economic loss due to pneumonia in ruminants is estimated to be 8% of the total cost of production, that includes expenses in medical procedure, reduced food conversion, enhanced cost of production and reduced food supply for the people (Rico et al., 2017).

 

Infections from Mannheimia pathogens are correlated with poor management policies and develop as a secondary infection or as a result of acute stress. Transportation stress, viral infections, congested pens, inadequate housing conditions, abrupt improvements to the environment and other adverse situations improve the susceptibility of animals to M. haemolytica pneumonia (Abdullah et al., 2015; Jesse et al., 2017a). Moreover, M. haemolytica has many potential immunogens, including capsular polysaccharides, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), outer membrane proteins (OMPs), fimbriae, iron-regulated proteins and secreted leukotoxin (Confer, 1993).

 

Animals infected with pneumonia develop clinical signs including high fever, extreme respiratory involvements established by nasal discharges, frothy mouth, cough and dyspnoea (Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008). The diagnosis of pneumonic pasteurellosis is based on history of the clinical manifestation, clinical signs, post-mortem and histopathological results, associated with the isolation of the bacteria and confirmation with the use of PCR (Ahmed et al., 2017). Treatment can be achieved with a combination of antimicrobials such as penicillin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone and enrofloxacin and suitable anti-inflammatory agents like flunixin meglumine, meloxicam (Rahal et al., 2014; Thiry et al., 2014; Achard et al., 2018; Politis et al., 2019). However, prevention plans remain more efficient, which includes improving housing situations, sanitation and biosecurity procedures. It is best to avoid stressors, such as assembling animals of different backgrounds without adequate quarantine (Taunde et al., 2019).

 

The pathophysiology of the respiratory system due to M. haemolytica was focused in previous studies (Abdullah et al., 2015). However, it is unknown whether M. haemolytica have insidious effects on the reproductive system as it was often overlooked by the farmers and veterinarians. As far as we know, there is less information available on the reproductive physiology and pathological changes in small ruminants after infection of M. haemolytica and its immunogens. Therefore, the goal of this review is to highlight the importance of M. haemolytica infection of female reproductive system in small ruminants to concentrate the researchers for further work on this neglected area.

 

Biology of Mannheimia haemolytica

History and taxonomy of Mannheimia haemolytica

Mannheimia haemolytica is the most prevalent etiological agent of pneumonia in sheep, goats and other species of ruminants which cause economic losses worldwide due to high mortality, cost of treatment, poor weight gain and condition (Highlander, 2001). M. haemolytica formerly was known as Pasteurella haemolytica, which is involved in the aetiology of ovine pneumonia or enzootic pneumonia (Kumar et al., 2015) and bovine respiratory disease (BRD) (Confer, 2009), and it is in the family of Pasteurellaceae, genus Mannheimia (Rice et al., 2007).

 

There has been an extensive reclassification of the bacterium in the past; Theodore kit named it bacterium bipolare multocidum first in 1885, and ten years later Flugge renamed it bacillus boviseptica in 1896 and subdivided it further into various types triggering bovine fibrinous pneumonia (Pasteurella boviseptica) or hemorrhagic septicaemia (now known as Pasteurella multocida) (Highlander, 2001). Jones (1921) has reported three groups of bovine Pasteurella and stated that group I is different from other groups in its ability to hemolyze and its failure to produce indole. Further characterisation of strains was carried on by Newson and Cross (1932), and for group I of Bacillus bovisepticus they suggested the term Pasteurella haemolytica, as this group caused pneumonia in calves (Angen et al., 1999). Based on phenotypic epidemiological and pathological characters, Smith (1959) identified two biotypes of P. haemolytica. These biotypes were identified as A and T, corresponding to either L-arabinose or trehalose fermentation ability. Seventeen serotypes of P. haemolytica have been described, 13 identified as serotype A and four serotype T (Younan and Fodor, 1995). Serotype T strains were subsequently reclassified as Pasteurella trehalosi and eventually Bibersteinia trehalose (Blackall et al., 2007). Serotype A strains of the old P. haemolytica with five species namely Mannheimia haemolytica, Mannheimia glucosida, Mannheimia granulomatous, Mannheimia ruminalis and Mannheimia varigena formed new genus called Mannheimia (Blackall et al., 2001; Angen et al., 2002; Ponnusamy et al., 2017).

 

M. haemolytica serotypes A1 and A2 are the common serotypes usually distributed all over the world. Serotype A1 is considered to be the most prevalent cause of bovine pasteurellosis, although certain serotypes, such as A6 and A9, are commonly correlated with bovine diseases (Quirie et al., 1986). While serotype A2 is the most common serotype related to the disease in sheep and goats; in healthy calves, it is also a prevalent member of flora in the upper respiratory tract. Furthermore, M. haemolytica serotypes A1 and A2 that inhabit both cattle and sheep upper respiratory tracts are typically species-specific in their potential to induce lower respiratory disease (Highlander, 2001).

 

M. haemolytica serotype A1 as stated is the main reason of pneumonic pasteurellosis in cattle, and M. haemolytica serotypes A2 is also the leading cause of sheep and goats pneumonic pasteurellosis while serotypes of B. trehalosi cause the disease septicaemic pasteurellosis in sheep and goats, and interspecies serotypes transmission amid domestic ruminants, as well as between domestic and wild ruminants, has been stated (Berhe et al., 2017).

 

Morphology of Mannheimia haemolytica

Species of the genera Pasteurella and Mannheimia of the family Pasteurellaceae are small gram-negative rods or coccobacilli, nonmotile, non-spore-forming, facultatively anaerobic, oxidase-positive, and fermentative, and they naturally inhabit in the domestic and wild animals upper respiratory and digestive tract mucous membrane (Wilson and Ho, 2013). These organisms grow best on blood agar and produce a narrow zone of haemolysis, and they also grow on MacConkey agar (Tabatabaei and Abdollahi, 2018). Blood smears stained by Giemsa methods, pasteurellae species show bipolar staining, which is the characteristic staining pattern for these organisms (Ashraf et al., 2011).

 

Pathogenesis and pathology of Mannheimia haemolytica

Pathogenicity of Mannheimia haemolytica

Mannheimia species are common commensals of the nasopharynx in many domestic and wild animals, including cats, dogs, horses, birds, and ruminants (Adamu, 2007; Roier et al., 2013). These species can cause infection when the animals’ immunity becomes compromised (Guzmán-Brambila et al., 2012; Assefa and Kelkay, 2018). Furthermore, M. haemolytica is the most significant bovine respiratory disease complex bacterial pathogen. It induces in its most serious type, severe fibrinous pleuropneumonia characterised by extensive leukocyte infiltration in alveoli, intraalveolar haemorrhage, deposition of fibrin, and consolidation of the lungs (Aulik et al., 2012).

 

Most species of animals are M. haemolytica and P. trehalosi asymptomatic carriers, and also they carry strains of P. multocida. In cattle, M. haemolytica is associated with diseases including pneumonic pasteurellosis, haemorrhagic septicaemia and abortion, mastitis, pneumonia, and septicaemia in domestic sheep and isolates in domestic goats (Adamu, 2007). A study by Williams et al. (2005) for evaluating the postpartum vaginal mucus clinically in cattle stated that M. haemolytica is linked with fetid vaginal mucus odour. Therefore, the authors have seen that there was an increased risk for fetid vaginal mucus odour and culture growth of M. haemolytica. The involvement of M. haemolytica in vaginal mucus odour was a new observation. However, M. haemolytica effects on the reproductive system in small ruminants remains unclear, and its pathogenesis has to be discovered.

 

Transmission of Pasteurella is likely caused by inhalation of the contaminated droplet, coughed up or exhaled from infected animals which may be the clinical case or recovered carriers where the infection persists in the upper respiratory tract (Kabeta et al., 2015). M. haemolytica is carried in the nasopharynx and tonsils of seemingly healthy animals (Rowe et al., 2001). P. multocida and M. haemolytica are particularly vulnerable to the environmental influence, and the mediated contagion is uncertain to be an essential factor in the disease transmission. Under favourable circumstances, particularly when cattle are confined in inadequately ventilated trains, the disease will spread very rapidly in holding pens and feedlots, and affect a significant percentage of the herd within 48 hours. However, animals at pasture are able to move freely, which decreases the rate of spread (Kabeta et al., 2015).

 

Virulence factors

M. haemolytica has a number of potential immunogens. Capsular polysaccharide, LPS, OMPs, fimbriae, iron-regulated proteins and a secreted leukotoxin (LKT) are the most likely potential ones to stimulate immunity (Confer, 1993). These factors make it possible for M. haemolytica to cytolyse alveolar phagocytic cells and replicate in the lung that further increases proliferation of the bacteria and involvement of the direct or indirect role in lung injury (Jeyaseelan et al., 2002).

 

Capsule

The cell capsule plays a significant role in the pathogenicity of pathogenic bacteria and the growth of the infection. Virulence mechanism of the cell capsule is largely due to its potential to interfere host immune defence against invading organism (Chae et al., 1990). In addition to its antiphagocytic abilities, M. haemolytica cell capsule can serve as an adhesin (Confer, 2009). Each M. haemolytica serotype develops a characteristic polysaccharide capsule to avoid macrophages and polymorphonuclear leukocytes from phagocytosis and to prevent the organism from the complement-mediated destruction of the serum outer membrane (Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008). The capsular polysaccharide of M. haemolytica Serotype A1 is composed repeats of N-acetylmannosaminuronic acid and N-acetylmannosamine that is needed to promote adherence, inhibit neutrophils phagocytosis and assist the pathogen in avoiding immune system (Klima et al., 2017), whereas serotype A2 capsule consists of linear N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) polymer with α (2–8) linkages of polysialic acid (PolySia) that is identical to those found on the host cells (Klima et al., 2017; Lizak et al., 2017). The molecular mimicry of PolySia bacterial capsules is an effective method to prevent the host’s immune detection, as they are not considered foreign (Mazmanian and Kasper, 2006). Capsular polysaccharide deposition in the sheep lungs results in oedema and a mild neutrophilic infiltration with capsular polysaccharide binding to surfactant (Confer and Ayalew, 2018).

 

M. haemolytica capsular material can also interfere with the pulmonary surfactant to facilitate the adherence of the invading organism to the susceptible animals in the epithelium of the respiratory tract (Brogden et al., 1989). The capsular polysaccharide is immunogenic, but responses of antibody to capsular polysaccharide do not associate with resistance to experimental challenges (Confer, 2009).

 

Fimbriae

Bacterial adhesins, such as fimbriae are the first factors interacting with the host in an infection process, suggesting that these factors are likely to have a vital impact on the ability of the bacteria to survive and subsequently colonise the host (Kline et al., 2009). For gram-negative bacteria, the importance of fimbriae virulence is due to their ability to attach host tissue as fimbrial antigens on bacterial surfaces are abundant in general and highly immunogenic (Rajeev et al., 2001). Two types of fimbriae have been found in M. haemolytica serotype 1; one is rigid and large, measures 12 nm in width, and the other one measures only 5 nm that is flexible and smaller in size (Morck et al., 1987; Potter et al., 1988). The two types of M. haemolytica fimbriae can enhance the organism mucosal attachment and colonisation of cattle and sheep lower respiratory tract epithelium (Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008).

 

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)

Basic M. haemolytica LPS composition has been reported to be close to that of other Gram-negative bacteria (Jeyaseelan et al., 2002). It was observed that M. haemolytica serotypes 2 and 8 to possess a rough LPS, whereas the remaining 14 serotypes have a distinctive smooth LPS (Lacroix et al., 1993). The LPS accounts for 10-25% of the dry weight of the bacteria M. haemolytica (Highlander, 2001; Leite et al., 2003). Moreover, LPS is an essential component of the Gram-negative bacterial cell wall outer membrane. LPS of M. haemolytica is made up of a lipid A, core oligosaccharide and polysaccharide side-chain that is called (O antigen) (Jeyaseelan et al., 2002).

 

Most of the effects caused by LPS are regulated by its lipid A component (Ulevitch and Tobias, 1995). The lipid A moiety participates in the anchoring of the LPS into the outer membrane, and it consists of phospholipids and lipids, meaning the lipid A unit known as endotoxin, with the toxic and pyrogenic effects of LPS (Mamat et al., 2015). Besides, the immunogenicity of LPS O antigen and the cross-reactivity of antibodies between different serotypes, there is, unfortunately, no correlation between pneumonia development and high antibody response to LPS in terms of host protection (Confer et al., 1990). Therefore, LPS can lead to pulmonary pathology in a number of complex mechanisms, that includes direct pulmonary endothelium toxicity effects, activation of complement and subsequent recruitment of neutrophils (Gonzalez and Maheswaran, 1993; Leite et al., 2003).

 

LPS can also lead to the extent of lung lesions by bovine leukocytes stimulation to produce and release inflammatory mediators such as histamine, LTB4, TNF-a, IL-1b and prostaglandin E2 (Leite et al., 2003). For instance, early work with purified LPS injected at sublethal concentrations in sheep either intravenously or intraarterially resulted in pulmonary arterial pressure to increase and cardiac output to decrease and also caused decreased pulmonary, venous and systemic blood pressure (Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008). Further studies in calves have also demonstrated a variety of related physiological effects of the purified LPS to those produced by chemical mediators including prostaglandins, serotonin, thromboxane A2, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) (Emau et al., 1987; Rice et al., 2007; Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008) All of these above-listed mediators were considered to be responsible for clinical symptoms correlated with endotoxic shocks (Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008).

 

LPS not only effects the pulmonary system but it also affects the reproductive system of female animals, as several studies have shown bacterial infections in ruminant animals have a negative impact on the physiology of female reproductive system. Therefore, presence of gram-negative bacteria or their endotoxin (LPS) in the uterus causes endometritis in cattle which has negative consequences on the reproduction (Dohmen et al., 2000; Chanrot et al., 2017; Wan et al., 2019). Besides, LPS also causes endometrial reactions, resulting in acute or chronic inflammation that impairs reproductive function and inhibits hypothalamic production of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), secretion of luteinising hormone (LH) in the pituitary, and the sensitivity of the pituitary to GnRH in small ruminants, and these changes will cause animals to be less likely ovulating (Sheldon et al., 2009). Most of these reactions involve the secretion of cytokines (interleukins 1, 6, 8 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha) (Beutler et al., 2003; Chanrot et al., 2017) that stimulates and attracts innate immune system cells like monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils and natural killer cells into the stroma. LPS also causes dysregulation of prostaglandin secretion and activates endometrial cells to produce PGE rather than PGF (Herath et al., 2009), PGE2 acts as an inflammatory mediator in pathological conditions that activates the inflammatory response by inducing the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and various chemokines which cause damage to the endometrial tissue (Herath et al., 2009; Sheldon et al., 2014; Deng et al., 2019).

 

P. multocida and its immunogens LPS have been demonstrated to have pathological effects in the female reproductive system and function which is closely related to M. haemolytica. A study by Jesse et al. (2014) stated P. multocida type B:2 and its LPS to cause significant changes in the pituitary gland, as well as the reproductive organs and the related levels of hormones in orally inoculated female mice. The pathological findings in the pituitary gland and ovaries were degeneration, necrosis, haemorrhage and oedema. These damages to the cells producing hormones in the pituitary gland and ovaries caused changes in the production of hormones; increased production of progesterone levels and decreased production of oestrogen levels which leads to uncertainty of reproductive status. Therefore, fertility potentials may be low, and animals will not be pregnant due to disruptions in hormone level production. In addition, a study by Ibrahim et al. (2016) revealed the involvement of hemorrhagic septicaemia pathogenesis in the female reproductive system by successfully isolating the bacteria from multiple areas of reproductive system namely ovaries, oviduct, uterine horn, uterine body and vagina as well as the mammary gland and supramammary lymph nodes of infected buffaloes with P. multocida type B: 2 subcutaneously. This study suggests P. multocida type B: 2 pathogenesis involvement in the female reproductive system in ruminants infected with HS infection.

 

In another study conducted by Othman et al. (2014) in non-pregnant goats using Gram-positive bacteria Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis revealed that C. pseudotuberculosis infection could be implicated in imbalances in the hormonal levels, primarily oestrogen and progesterone, that can lead to infertility. In addition to the hormonal imbalances, cellular changes such as congestion, necrosis, oedema and inflammatory cell infiltration, which in the extent of the infected female goats was varied particularly in the iliac lymph nodes, ovaries and uterus have been observed. C. pseudotuberculosis also resulted in elevations of oestrogen and progesterone levels in the goats’ blood plasma (Jesse et al., 2015).

 

Similarly, Khuder et al. (2012) carried on a study to determine the reproductive pathophysiology response related to C. pseudotuberculosis and its exotoxin (PLD) in a mouse model. Cellular changes of severe haemorrhage, formation of thrombus, degeneration, vacuolisation and necrosis has reported this study as well as hormonal imbalances. The ovaries and the uterus showed congestion with infiltration of macrophages and neutrophils, oedema, necrosis and degeneration in the animals inoculated with the life bacteria. In contrast, ovaries and uterus of exotoxin (PLD) inoculated animals had severe congestion, profound thrombus formation and necrosis. The results of this study, therefore, revealed significant variations in sex hormones and changes in the cells of the reproductive organs related to C. pseudotuberculosis and its exotoxin phospholipase D (PLD) infection.

 

These studies suggested that bacterial infections predispose to infertility in affected small ruminant animals. Therefore, pattern recognition receptors are activated by the bacteria and their immunogens that respond to pathogens associated with molecular patterns. These receptors contain toll-like receptors (TLR) and others, and their activation terminates in upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines like IL- 1β, IL-18, and tumour necrosis factor-α. These may have direct effects on the uterus and conceptus (Gilbert, 2019).

 

No studies were performed to investigate M. haemolytica effects on the female reproductive system and performance during mannheimiosis in female farm animals. Therefore, further research is needed in this area to investigate reproductive disorders in small ruminants due to M. haemolytica and its LPS endotoxin infection.

 

Outer membrane protein (OMP)

The pathogenic Gram-negative bacterial outer membrane is at the interface in both the pathogen and the host that contains more than 100 proteins those have essential roles to play in pathogenesis, and the exact roles of different OMPs in pneumonic pasteurellosis pathogenesis remains to be understood (Davies, 2016). M. haemolytica lipoproteins and outer membrane proteins may be associated with serum sensitivity, as they are considered to be significant antigens for protection (Highlander, 2001; Adamu, 2007). M. haemolytica has several outer membrane proteins (OMP) which are recognised as surface immunogens that are essential for bacterial adherence and colonisation of the respiratory tract (Pandher et al., 1999). M. haemolytica, however, contains an essential outer membrane protein A (OmpA) (Mahasreshti et al., 1997; Kisiela and Czuprynski, 2009). This protein in M. haemolytica is also recognised as the heat modifiable outer membrane protein (OMP) or PomA (Mahasreshti et al., 1997; Zeng et al., 1999).

 

OmpA is involved in cell receptors binding and facilitates many of the pathogenic bacteria to attach to host cells (Kisiela and Czuprynski, 2009). It was suggested based on homology of the sequence that M. haemolytica OmpA could play a crucial role in the colonisation of respiratory tracts of cattle and sheep (Davies and Lee, 2004; Kisiela and Czuprynski, 2009). Further investigation has revealed variations in alleles among OmpA isolated from bovine and ovine M. haemolytica strains stating that the OmpA role specificity in these species (Davies and Lee, 2004). The OmpA gene with regard to the variations in the alleles are categorised into four different allelic classes I to IV. Alleles of class I (OmpA1) are almost entirely associated with isolates from bovine M. haemolytica, nevertheless classes II to IV (OmpA2 to OmpA4) alleles of M. haemolytica only occur in isolates from ovine strains (Davies and Lee, 2004; Hounsome et al., 2011).

 

M. haemolytica also produces a variety of proteins that are iron-regulated outer membrane proteins, including Tbp 1 and Tbp 2 which are pathologically and physiologically important in terms of the acquisition of iron (Ogunnariwo et al., 1997). Since siderophores are not produced in M. haemolytica, the primary mechanism for acquisition of iron is the expression of these iron-regulated outer membrane proteins (Ogunnariwo et al., 1997; Kirby et al., 1998; Singh et al., 2011).

 

M. haemolytica and its immunogen OMP involvement in the reproductive performance has to be fully explored, as there is scarce of literatures stating M. haemolytica involvement in the reproductive system. However, the closely related bacteria P. multocida and its endotoxin LPS involvement in terms of the function and performance of the reproductive system has been discussed in this review. A study by Ibrahim et al. (2018) for assessing clinically and histopathologically, the lesions in the reproductive system in buffalo heifers due to P. multocida type B2 immunogens has stated following OMP inoculation; there was congestion and haemorrhage which was significantly higher in the ovaries, cervix, vagina, mammary and supra-mammary glands of buffaloes inoculated subcutaneously, in addition to a significant increase in necrosis severity and degeneration in the ovaries, uterine horn, uterine body, mammary and supramammary glands of the buffaloes. Another study by Jesse et al. (2017b) reported severe histopathological changes in the anterior pituitary gland following challenge with P. multocida type B2 subcutaneously and its OMPs both in oral and subcutaneous routes, as well as decrease in GnRH, LH, FSH, estrogen and progesterone hormone concentrations. This study reported the correlation between the lesions of the adenohypophysis, decreased production of hypothalamic GnRH and decreased levels of the hormones LH, FSH, estrogen and progesterone in buffalo heifers inoculated experimentally with P. multocida type B:2 and its LPS endotoxin and OMPs. On the basis of these results, P. multocida and its immunogens can lead to infertility in buffalo heifers.

 

There is a gap in research related to the effects of M. haemolytica and its immunogens on the reproductive performance and physiology, as vast of studies concentrated on effects in the respiratory system. From this literature review, we have seen some studies conducted on P. multocida and its immunogens OMP and LPS has its involvements in the reproductive system physiology and performance. As it is known, Pasteurella and Mannheimia species are closely related together, as both causing pneumonic pasteurellosis in ruminants. By that perspective, we can conclude M. haemolytica and its immunogens may have a negative impact on the reproductive performance in both female and male animals. To support, Van der Burgt et al. (2007) reported infertility and endometritis outbreaks in a small dairy herd in the UK which may Histophilus somni (previously Haemophilus somnus) have involved. The cases were not responsive to treatment with some cows having granular vaginitis and the conception rate in the herd was poor. Therefore, they have concluded that H. somni directed to issues of infertility such as granular vaginitis, endometritis and low rates of pregnancy (Van der Burgt et al., 2007). P. multocida, M. haemolytica and H. somni belonging to the family Pasteurellaceae are part of the upper respiratory tract commensals (Gaeta et al., 2017). They are involved in long term effects with negative impacts on production, reproductive performance and fertility (Cernicchiaro et al., 2013; Gaeta et al., 2017).

 

Therefore, in this field, more research is needed to clarify one of the reproductive disorders in small ruminants that may be caused by M. haemolytica and its immunogens and to understand its pathogenesis in the reproductive system of the female animals.

 

Pathology of Mannheimia haemolytica

Clinical signs

Pneumonic pasteurellosis is a wide range of disease covering around all continents. This disease has an acute febrile course of occurrence with extreme fibrinous or fibrinopurulent bronchopneumonia, fibrinous pleurisy, and septicaemia (Abdullah et al., 2015). Young animals are susceptible to the disease more than the adults, and they develop more serious infection where sudden death can happen with or without any prior clinical signs (Chung et al., 2015). Clinically, cattle with M. haemolytica respiratory infections may experience or suffer from fever, cough, nasal discharge and respiratory distress combined with inappetence and loss of weight (Rice et al., 2007). In the early stages of the disease, the respiratory rate rises accompanied by dyspnoea that in some cases, causes oral breathing and expiratory grunting (Yates, 1982). Moreover, animals with the disease soon develop high fever (40-41°c), anorexia and rapid shallow respiration accompanied by mucopurulent nasal discharge and subsequently productive cough that normally occurs in most affected animals emphasised by movement or physical effort (Kabeta et al., 2015). In severe cases, however, infected animals will die as a consequence of toxaemia that occurs even before major pulmonary lesions development. Sudden death, in this case, is considered to have been the first indication of acute outbreaks in this situation, primarily young calves (Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008).

 

An acute outbreak of pneumonic pasteurellosis in sheep and goats flock normally begins with one or more death cases, specifically when lambs and kids are at risk, and sheep and goats were having obvious respiratory disease symptoms. These latter suffer tremendously from high temperatures (> 40°C) and dyspnoea, and observing the rest of the flock will demonstrate a mild respiratory disease such as coughing and oculo-nasal discharges. Animals recovering from the disease, development of chronic lung lesions may be observed, and they may remain unthrifty afterwards (Gilmour, 1980). The possible effects on the reproductive system after infection with M. haemolytica in animals are to be discovered, as studies mainly concentrated on the effects of the pulmonary. We hypothesise that after recovery from pneumonia due to Mannheimia will affect negatively on the reproductive performance of the animal.

 

Pneumonic pasteurellosis can affect severely in lambs and kids, clinical signs of fever, lethargy, dyspnoea, reduced appetite can be observed, and sudden death is more common in young animals. Those animals who survive from the acute phase of the disease may recover, or they may become chronically infected with the disease have reduced lung capacity and impaired weight gain, and the occurrence of sporadic deaths tend to be a serious issue (Chung et al., 2015).

 

Post mortem changes and histopathological lesions

Among infected small ruminants with pneumonic pasteurellosis, the most noticeable gross lesions that can be found are the marbling of the lung, presence of excess straw-coloured fluid in the thoracic cavity, as well as the appearance of frothy exudates in the trachea, bronchi and damaged lungs surface (Jesse et al., 2019). Pulmonary lesions are always bilateral with the distribution of cranioventral, while the most affected portions are below the horizontal line generally by the trachea bifurcation, apical and the cardiac lobes. Infections affecting large parts of the diaphragmatic lobe may be more common in severe cases (Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008). Furthermore, fibrin and oedema fluid accumulation areas in interlobular septa and alveoli are the most evident lesions. The lesions consisted of congestion, consolidation, hardness, raised red to bronze areas up to 1 cm in diameter and fibrinous pleuritis (Ames et al., 1985; Chung et al., 2017). Acute fibrinous haemorrhagic pneumonia with pleurisy adhesions, however, are the basic post mortem lesions (Daoust, 1989). Besides, numerous areas of coagulative necrosis are commonly found within the portions of the pneumonic lung parenchyma appearing in irregular shape and clearly demarcated with white borders that are thick and have deep red central zone (Mohamed and Abdelsalam, 2008).

 

In calves, the pulmonary lesions in the affected lobules of typical bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis are reddish-black, hard and elevated above the normal surface of the lung. There is generally distended septa and a dull fibrinous exudate on the visceral pleura, and there are two to three litres of straw-coloured thoracic fluid in some affected lungs, and there is emphysema with bullae formation (Stockdale et al., 1979).

 

In adult cattle, Pathological changes due to mannheimiosis have been studied extensively. M. haemolytica causes fibrinous bronchopneumonia characterised by exudate mainly consisting of fibrin inside the lumen of bronchi, bronchioles and alveoli with coagulative necrosis and interlobular-septal oedema (Zhang et al., 2020). Lung lesions consisting of purple-red or grey consolidation with small haemorrhagic foci in the ventrocranial and accessory lobes with gelatinous interlobular septal expansion has been reported (Yaman et al., 2018). Fibrinous pleuritis and coagulative necrosis areas can be seen as well as pleural thickening and adherence of the lungs to the chest wall with Mucopurulent exudate in the small bronchi and bronchioles (Yaman et al., 2018; Blakebrough-Hall et al., 2020). Histopathological findings consisting of proliferative changes in the lung parenchyma characterised by type-II epithelial cell proliferation in the alveoli with dense infiltration in the alveoli and bronchioles, neutrophils and mononuclear cells mixed with fibrin has been reported, in addition to the observation of fibrin plugs in the lymphatic vessels and venules (Yaman et al., 2018). Furthermore, congestion, haemorrhage, oedema, and atelectasis with alveolar spaces filled by cellular infiltrate and proliferation of type II pneumocytes (Yaman et al., 2018; Ola et al., 2020)

 

The presence of P. multocida and its immunogens in other structures of the body apart from the respiratory system has been confirmed (Annas et al., 2014, 2015). Marza et al. (2017) stated that P. multocida B2 LPS is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and inducing pathological lesions in multiple areas of the nervous system of the buffalo calves challenged with LPS. The authors have reported mild congestion in the cerebrum in this study as well as in the brainstem, the rest of the nervous system was observed to be normal in these animals inoculated with 10 ml of LPS broth extract from P. multocida B2 orally. In contrast, animals challenged with 10 ml of LPS broth extract from P. multocida B2 intravenously has revealed encephalitis with severe brain congestion, especially in the cerebrum and brainstem, whilst the cerebellum was less affected, and there was slight congestion in the meninges.

 

Also, Ibrahim et al. (2018) has stated histopathological alterations in the reproductive organs of buffalo calves, including oedema, congestion and haemorrhage, necrosis and degeneration and inflammatory cell infiltration. Histopathological changes were observed primarily in the ovary, uterine body, uterine horn, oviduct and supramammary lymph node, while there is affection in the cervix, vagina and mammary glands.

 

We can conclude that there is an association between P. multocida and the performance of the reproductive system in female animals with reference to the literature stated above. Similarly, M. haemolytica, which is closely associated with P. multocida, its involvement in the reproductive system of female animals has to be discovered, and the possible effects on the reproduction.

 

CONCLUSION

 

M. haemolytica is normal commensal on the respiratory tract of animals, with the interaction of many variables, including mostly environmental stress with viral or bacterial agents, trigger the bacteria from its commensal state into a pathogen causing pneumonic pasteurellosis. Previous studies were concentrated on M. haemolytica involvement in the respiratory system, and it effects on the respiratory tract, but its involvement in the reproductive system is not studied well, and there is lack of information related the bacterial involvement and its immunogens (LPS and OMP) on the reproductive system. As the above-mentioned studies highly suggest that Gram negative bacteria and their immunogens may have adverse effects on infected animals, which may impair their reproductive functions as well. Therefore, future studies have to be conducted on the M. haemolytica bacterium and its immunogens effect on the various parts of the reproductive system and its physiological changes.

 

Authors Contribution

 

All authors contributed equally and approved the final manuscript.

 

Conflict of interest

 

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

 

References

 

• Abdullah FF, Tijjani A, Adamu L, Chung ELT, Abba Y, Mohammed K, Saharee A, Haron A, Sadiq M, Mohd A (2015). Pneumonic pasteurellosis in a goat. Iran. J. Vet. Med. 8(4): 293-296.

• Achard D, Caruso-Vares A, Collin J, McKelvie J, Reddick D, Ramage C (2018). Treatment of experimentally induced bovine respiratory disease in young calves with a single administration of a combination of florfenicol and meloxicam Vet. Rec. 183: 535. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.104795

• Adamu J (2007). Mannheimia haemolytica: phylogeny and genetic analysis of its major virulence factors. Isr. J. Vet. Med. 62(1): 6.

• Ahmed WA, Mohammed RJ, Khalaf IA (2017). Molecular and Phenotypical Characterization of Mannheimia haemolytica Isolated from Goats in Baghdad Province. Adv. Microbiol. 7(04): 304-314. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2017.74025

• Ames TR, Markham R, Opuda-Asibo J, Leininger J, Maheswaran S (1985). Pulmonary response to intratracheal challenge with Pasteurella haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida. Can. J. Comp. Med. 49(4): 395-400.

• Angen Ø, Ahrens P, Bisgaard M (2002). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica-like strains isolated from diseased animals in Denmark. Vet. Microbiol. 84(1-2): 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00439-4

• Angen Ø, Mutters R, Caugant DA, Olsen JE, Bisgaard M (1999). Taxonomic relationships of the [Pasteurella] haemolytica complex as evaluated by DNA-DNA hybridizations and 16S rRNA sequencing with proposal of Mannheimia haemolytica gen. nov., comb, nov., Mannheimia granulomatis comb. nov., Mannheimia glucosida sp. nov., Mannheimia ruminalis sp. nov. and Mannheimia varigena sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49(1): 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-1-67

• Annas S, Abubakar M, Zamri-Saad M, Jesse F, Zunita Z (2015). Pathological changes in the respiratory, gastrointestinal and urinary tracts of buffalo calves following experimental hemorrhagic septicemia. Pak. Vet. J. 35(4): 430-435.

• Annas S, Zamri-Saad M, Jesse FFA, Zunita Z (2014). New sites of localisation of Pasteurella multocida B: 2 in buffalo surviving experimental haemorrhagic septicaemia. BMC Vet. Res. 10(1): 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-88

• Ashraf A, Tariq H, Shah S, Nadeem S, Manzoor I, Ali S, Ijaz A, Gailani S, Mehboob S (2011). Characterization of Pasteurella multocida strains isolated from cattle and buffaloes in Karachi,Pakistan. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5(26): 4673-4677. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.068

• Assefa GA, Kelkay MZ (2018). Goat pasteurellosis: serological analysis of circulating Pasteurella serotypes in Tanqua Aberegelle and Kola Tembien Districts, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Res. Notes. 11(1): 485. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3606-0

• Aulik NA, Hellenbrand KM, Czuprynski CJ (2012). Mannheimia haemolytica and its leukotoxin cause macrophage extracellular trap formation by bovine macrophages. Infect. Immun. 80(5): 1923-1933. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.06120-11

• Berhe K, Weldeselassie G, Bettridge J, Christley R, Abdi R (2017). Small ruminant pasteurellosis in Tigray region, Ethiopia: marked serotype diversity may affect vaccine efficacy. Epidemiol. Infect. 145(7): 1326-1338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881600337X

• Beutler B, Hoebe K, Du X, Ulevitch R (2003). How we detect microbes and respond to them: the Toll‐like receptors and their transducers. J. Leukoc. Biol. 74(4): 479-485. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0203082

• Blackall P, Angen Ø, Fegan N, Blackall L, Mutters R, Bisgaard M (2001). Characterisation of a novel Mannheimia sp from Australian feedlot cattle. Aust. Vet. J. 79(9): 634-639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10787.x

• Blackall PJ, Bojesen AM, Christensen H, Bisgaard M (2007). Reclassification of [Pasteurella] trehalosi as Bibersteinia trehalosi gen. nov., comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57(4): 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64521-0

• Blakebrough-Hall C, Mcmeniman JP, González LA (2020). An evaluation of the economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on animal performance, carcass traits, and economic outcomes in feedlot cattle defined using four BRD diagnosis methods. J. Anim. Sci. 98: skaa005. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa005

• Brogden K, Adlam C, Lehmkuhl H, Cutlip R, Knights J, Engen R (1989). Effect of Pasteurella haemolytica (A1) capsular polysaccharide on sheep lung in vivo and on pulmonary surfactant in vitro. Am. J. Vet. Res. 50(4): 555-559.

• Cernicchiaro N, White BJ, Renter DG, Babcock AH (2013). Evaluation of economic and performance outcomes associated with the number of treatments after an initial diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in commercial feeder cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 74(2): 300-309. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.74.2.300

• Chae CH, Gentry M, Confer A, Anderson G (1990). Resistance to host immune defense mechanisms afforded by capsular material of Pasteurella haemolytica, serotype 1. Vet. Microbiol. 25(2-3): 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(90)90081-6

• Chanrot M, Guo Y, Dalin A, Persson E, Båge R., Svensson A, Gustafsson H, Humblot P (2017). Dose related effects of LPS on endometrial epithelial cell populations from dioestrus cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 177: 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.12.002

• Chung ELT, Abdullah FFJ, Abba Y, Tijjani A, Sadiq MA, Mohammed K, Osman AY, Adamu L, Lila MAM, Haron AW (2015). Clinical management of pneumonic pasteurellosis in Boer kids: A case report. Int. J. Livest. Res. 5(4): 100-104. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20150417014307

• Chung ELT, Abdullah FFJ, Marza AD, Saleh WMM, Ibrahim HH, Abba Y, Zamri-Saad M, Haron AW, Saharee AA, Lila MAM (2017). Clinico-pathology and hemato-biochemistry responses in buffaloes infected with Pasteurella multocida type B: 2 immunogen outer membrane protein. Microb. Pathog. 102: 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2016.11.015

• Confer AW, Panciera RJ, Clinkenbeard KD, Mosier DA (1990). Molecular aspects of virulence of Pasteurella haemolytica. Can. J. Vet. Res. 54 (Suppl): S48-S52.

• Confer AW (1993). Immunogens of pasteurella. Vet. Microbiol. 37(3-4): 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(93)90034-5

• Confer AW (2009). Update on bacterial pathogenesis in BRD. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 10(2): 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252309990193

• Confer AW, Ayalew S (2018). Mannheimia haemolytica in bovine respiratory disease: immunogens, potential immunogens, and vaccines. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 19(2): 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252318000142

• Daoust PY (1989). Morphological study of bacterial pneumonia of feedlot cattle: Determination of age of lesions. Can. Vet. J. 30(2): 155.

• Davies RL (2016). Outer Membrane Proteins as Potential Anti‐infective Drug Targets in Mannheimia haemolytica. In: G. Unden, E. Thines, and A. Schüffler (Eds.), Host-Pathogen Interaction: Microbial Metabolism, Pathogenicity and Antiinfectives. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, pp. 109-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527682386.ch7

• Davies RL, Lee I (2004). Sequence diversity and molecular evolution of the heat-modifiable outer membrane protein gene (ompA) of Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica, Mannheimia glucosida, and Pasteurella trehalosi. J. Bacteriol. 186(17): 5741-5752. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.17.5741-5752.2004

• Deng Y, Liu B, Mao W, Shen Y, Fu C, Gao L, Zhang S, Wu J, Li Q, Li T (2019). Regulatory roles of PGE2 in LPS-induced tissue damage in bovine endometrial explants. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 852: 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.03.044

• Dohmen M, Joop K, Sturk A, Bols P, Lohuis J (2000). Relationship between intra-uterine bacterial contamination, endotoxin levels and the development of endometritis in postpartum cows with dystocia or retained placenta. Theriogenology, 54(7): 1019-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00410-6

• Emau P, Giri SN, Bruss ML (1987). Effects of smooth and rough Pasteurella haemolytica lipopolysaccharides on plasma cyclic-nucleotides and free fatty acids in calves. Vet. Microbiol. 15(4): 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(87)90016-2

• Gaeta NC, Lima SF, Teixeira AG, Ganda EK, Oikonomou G, Gregory L, Bicalho RC (2017). Deciphering upper respiratory tract microbiota complexity in healthy calves and calves that develop respiratory disease using shotgun metagenomics. J. Dairy Sci. 100(2): 1445-1458. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11522

• Gilbert RO (2019). Symposium review: Mechanisms of disruption of fertility by infectious diseases of the reproductive tract. J. Dairy Sci. 102(4): 3754-3765. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15602

• Gilmour N (1980). Pasteurella haemolytica infections in sheep. Vet. Quart. 2(4): 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.1980.9693780

• Gonzalez C, Maheswaran S (1993). The role of induced virulence factors produced by Pasteurella haemolytica in the pathogenesis of bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis: review and hypotheses. Br. Vet. J. 149(2): 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1935(05)80088-0

• Guzmán-Brambila C, Quintero-Fabián S, González-Castillo C, Del Valle ÁDO-F, Flores-Samaniego B, De La Mora G, Rojas-Mayorquin AE, Ortuño-Sahagún D (2012). LKTA and PlpE small fragments fusion protein protect against Mannheimia haemolytica challenge. Res. Vet. Sci. 93(3): 1293-1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.07.004

• Herath S, Lilly ST, Fischer DP, Williams EJ, Dobson H, Bryant CE, Sheldon IM (2009). Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide Induces an Endocrine Switch from Prostaglandin F2α to Prostaglandin E2 in Bovine Endometrium. Endocrinology 150(4): 1912-1920. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2008-1379

• Highlander SK (2001). Molecular genetic analysis of virulence in Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica. Front. Biosci. 6(Sep): D1128-D1150. https://doi.org/10.2741/A574

• Hounsome JD, Baillie S, Noofeli M, Riboldi-Tunnicliffe A, Burchmore RJ, Isaacs NW, Davies RL (2011). Outer membrane protein A of bovine and ovine isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica is surface exposed and contains host species-specific epitopes. Infect. Immun. 79(11): 4332-4341. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.05469-11

• Ibrahim HH, Abba Y, Ahmed IM, Jesse FFA, Chung ELT, Marza AD, Zamri-Saad M, Omar AR, Bakar MZA, Saharee AA (2016). Molecular detection and pathology of Pasteurella multocida B: 2 in the reproductive system of pre-pubertal buffalo calves (Bubalus bubalis). Comp. Clin. Path. 25(2): 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-015-2184-y

• Ibrahim HH, Jesse FFA, Abba Y, Chung ELT, Marza AD, Haron AW, Zamri-Saad M, Omar A, Saharee AA (2018). Clinical and histopathological study on reproductive lesions caused by Pasteurella multocida type B2 immunogens in buffalo heifers. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. 21(2): 232–241. https://doi.org/10.15547/bjvm.969

• Jesse FFA, Adamu L, Tijjani A, Mohammed K, Abba Y, Sadiq MA, Zainal R, Sabu MJB, Saharee AA, Haron AW (2014). Hormonal and histopathological alterations in pituitary glands and reproductive organs of male and female mice orally inoculated with Pasteurella multocida type B: 2 and its lipopolysaccharides. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 9: 200-212.

• Jesse FFA, Latif NAA, Chung ELT, Sarah SA, Zamri-Saad M, Haron AW, Lila MAM, Zunita Z, Norsidin MJ (2015). Changes in the Reproductive Hormones of Non-Pregnant Does Infected Intradermally with Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in Chronic Form. Int. J. Livest. Res. 2015; 5(7): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20150622125157

• Jesse FFA, Chung ELT, Abba Y, Bitrus AA, Hambali IU, Lila MAM, Haron AW (2017a). Clinical management of stage I pinkeye with concurrent pneumonic pasteurellosis in a goat: A case report. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 4(4): 390-393. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2017.d228

• Jesse FFA, Ibrahim HH, Abba Y, Chung ELT, Marza AD, Mazlan M, Zamri-Saad M, Omar AR, Zakaria MZAB Saharee AA (2017b). Reproductive hormonal variations and adenohypophyseal lesions in pre-pubertal buffalo heifers inoculated with Pasteurella multocida type B: 2 and its immunogens. BMC Vet. Res. 13(1): 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1010-y

• Jesse FFA, Chung ELT, Abba Y, Muniandy KV, Tan AHAR, Maslamany D, Bitrus AA, Lila MAM, Norsidin MJ (2019). Establishment of lung auscultation scoring method and responses of acute phase proteins and heat shock proteins in vaccinated and non-vaccinated goats. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 51(2): 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1683-7

• Jeyaseelan S, Sreevatsan S, Maheswaran SK (2002). Role of Mannheimia haemolytica leukotoxin in the pathogenesis of bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 3(2): 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1079/AHRR200242

• Jones F (1921). A study of Bacillus bovisepticus. J. Exp. Med. 34(6): 561-577. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.34.6.561

• Kabeta T, Fikadu T, Zenebe T, Kebede G (2015). Review on the pneumonic pasteurellosis of cattle. Acad. J. Anim. Dis. 4(3): 177-184.

• Khuder Z, Osman AY, Jesse FFA, Haron AW, Saharee AA, Sabri J, Yousoff R, Abdullah R (2012). Sex hormone profiles and cellular changes of reproductive organs of mice experimentally infected with C. pseudotuberculosis and its exotoxin phospholipase D (PLD). IOSR J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 1(3): 24-29. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-0132429

• Kirby S, Lainson F, Donachie W, Okabe A, Tokuda M, Hatase O, Schryvers A (1998). The Pasteurella haemolytica 35 kDa iron-regulated protein is an FbpA homologue. Microbiology, 144(12): 3425-3436. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-144-12-3425

• Kisiela DI, Czuprynski CJ (2009). Identification of Mannheimia haemolytica adhesins involved in binding to bovine bronchial epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 77(1): 446-455. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00312-08

• Klima CL, Zaheer R, Briggs RE, McAllister TA (2017). A multiplex PCR assay for molecular capsular serotyping of Mannheimia haemolytica serotypes 1, 2, and 6. J. Microbiol. Methods. 139: 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2017.05.010

• Kline KA, Fälker S, Dahlberg S, Normark S, Henriques-Normark B (2009). Bacterial adhesins in host-microbe interactions. Cell Host Microbe. 5(6): 580-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2009.05.011

• Kumar J, Dixit SK, Kumar R (2015). Rapid detection of Mannheimia haemolytica in lung tissues of sheep and from bacterial culture. Vet. World 8(9): 1073 –1077. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.1073-1077

• Lacroix R, Duncan J, Jenkins R, Leitch R, Perry J, Richards J (1993). Structural and serological specificities of Pasteurella haemolytica lipopolysaccharides. Infect. Immun. 61(1): 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.61.1.170-181.1993

• Leite F, Gyles S, Atapattu D, Maheswaran S, Czuprynski C (2003). Prior exposure to Mannheimia haemolytica leukotoxin or LPS enhances β2-integrin expression by bovine neutrophils and augments LKT cytotoxicity. Microb. Pathog. 34(6): 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-4010(03)00060-3

• Lizak C, Worrall LJ, Baumann L, Pfleiderer MM, Volkers G, Sun T, Sim L, Wakarchuk W, Withers SG, Strynadka NC (2017). X-ray crystallographic structure of a bacterial polysialyltransferase provides insight into the biosynthesis of capsular polysialic acid. Sci. Rep. 7(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05627-z

• Mahasreshti PJ, Murphy GL, Wyckoff J, Farmer S, Hancock R, Confer AW (1997). Purification and partial characterization of the OmpA family of proteins of Pasteurella haemolytica. Infect. Immun. 65(1): 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.65.1.211-218.1997

• Mamat U, Wilke K, Bramhill D, Schromm AB, Lindner B, Kohl TA, Corchero JL, Villaverde A, Schaffer L, Head SR (2015). Detoxifying Escherichia coli for endotoxin-free production of recombinant proteins. Microb. Cell Fact. 14(1): 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0265-x

• Marza AD, Abdullah FFJ, Ahmed IM, Chung ELT, Ibrahim HH, Zamri-Saad M, Omar AR, Bakar MZA, Sahaaree AA, Haron AW (2017). The ability of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Pasteurella multocida B: 2 to induce clinical and pathological lesions in the nervous system of buffalo calves following experimental inoculation. Microb. Pathog. 104: 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.01.031

• Mazmanian SK, Kasper DL (2006). The love–hate relationship between bacterial polysaccharides and the host immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6(11): 849-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1956

• Mohamed R, Abdelsalam E (2008). A review on pneumonic pasteurellosis (respiratory mannheimiosis) with emphasis on pathogenesis, virulence mechanisms and predisposing factors. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. 11(3): 139-160.

• Morck D, Raybould T, Acres S, Babiuk L, Nelligan J, Costerton J (1987). Electron microscopic description of glycocalyx and fimbriae on the surface of Pasteurella haemolytica-A1. Can. J. Vet. Res. 51(1): 83-88.

• Newsom I, Cross F (1932). Some bipolar organisms found in pneumonia in sheep. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 80: 711-719.

• Ogunnariwo JA, Woo TK, Lo RY, Gonzalez GC, Schryvers AB (1997). Characterization of the Pasteurella haemolyticatransferrin receptor genes and the recombinant receptor proteins. Microb. Pathog. 23(5): 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpat.1997.0156

• Ola OO, Adeniran GA, Opoku-Agyemang T, Bediako E, Ishola O, Jarikre TA, Emikpe BO (2020). Pathology and immunohistochemical evaluation of lungs of cattle slaughtered at metropolitan abattoirs in Nigeria and Ghana. J. Immunoassay Immunochem. 41(3): 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/15321819.2020.1730889

• Othman AM, Jesse FFA, Adamu L, Abba Y, Adza Rina MN, Saharee AA, Wahid AH, Zamri-Saad M (2014). Changes in serum progesterone and estrogen concentrations in non-pregnant boer does following experimental infection with Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. J. Vet. Adv. 4(5): 524-528.

• Pandher K, Murphy GL, Confer AW (1999). Identification of immunogenic, surface-exposed outer membrane proteins of Pasteurella haemolytica serotype 1. Vet. Microbiol. 65(3): 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(98)00293-4

• Politis A, Vasileiou N, Ioannidi K, Mavrogianni V (2019). Treatment of bacterial respiratory infections in lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 176: 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.05.005

• Ponnusamy P, Ronald BSM, Kumar MR, Manickam R (2017). Isolation, identification and antibiogram of Mannheimia haemolytica associated with caprine pneumonia in the Cauvery Delta Region of Tamil Nadu. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(9): 3118-3122. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.385

• Potter AA, Ready K, Gilchrist J (1988). Purification of fimbriae from Pasteurella haemolytica A-1. Microb. Pathog. 4(4): 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0882-4010(88)90092-7

• Quirie M, Donachie W, Gilmour N (1986). Serotypes of Pasteurella haemolytica from cattle. Vet. Rec. 119(4): 93-94. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.119.4.93

• Rahal A, Ahmad AH, Prakash A, Mandil R, Kumar AT (2014). Environmental attributes to respiratory diseases of small ruminants. Vet. Med. Int. 2014: 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/853627

• Rajeev S, Kania SA, Nair RV, McPherson JT, Moore RN, Bemis DA (2001). Bordetella bronchiseptica fimbrial protein-enhanced immunogenicity of a Mannheimia haemolytica leukotoxin fragment. Vaccine, 19(32): 4842-4850. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00226-2

• Rice J, Carrasco-Medina L, Hodgins D, Shewen P (2007). Mannheimia haemolytica and bovine respiratory disease. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 8(2): 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252307001375

• Rico GR, Martínez-Castillo M, González-Ruíz C, Luna-Castro S, de la Garza M (2017). Mannheimia haemolytica A2 secretes different proteases into the culture medium and in outer membrane vesicles. Microb. Pathog. 113: 276-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.10.027

• Roier S, Fenninger JC, Leitner DR, Rechberger GN, Reidl J, Schild S (2013). Immunogenicity of Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica outer membrane vesicles. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 303(5): 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.05.001

• Rowe H, Poxton I, Donachie W (2001). Survival of Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica in tracheobronchial washings of sheep and cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 81(4): 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00361-3

• Sheldon IM, Cronin J, Goetze L, Donofrio G, Schuberth HJ (2009). Defining postpartum uterine disease and the mechanisms of infection and immunity in the female reproductive tract in cattle. Biol. Reprod. 81(6): 1025-1032. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.077370

• Sheldon IM, Cronin JG, Healey GD, Gabler C, Heuwieser W, Streyl D, Bromfield JJ, Miyamoto A, Fergani C, Dobson H (2014). Innate immunity and inflammation of the bovine female reproductive tract in health and disease. Reproduction, 148(3): R41-R51. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-14-0163

• Singh K, Ritchey J, Confer A (2011). Mannheimia haemolytica: Bacterial–host interactions in bovine pneumonia. Vet. Pathol. 48(2): 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985810377182

• Smith GR (1959). Isolation of two types of Pasteurella haemolytica from sheep. Nature, 183(4668): 1132. https://doi.org/10.1038/1831132a0

• Stockdale P, Jericho K, Yates W, Darcel ClQ, Langford E (1979). Experimental bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis II. Genesis and prevention. Can. J. Comp. Med. 43(3): 272.

• Tabatabaei M, Abdollahi F (2018). Isolation and identification of Mannheimia haemolytica by culture and polymerase chain reaction from sheep’s pulmonary samples in Shiraz, Iran. Vet. World, 11: 636-641.

• Taunde PA, Argenta FF, Bianchi RM, Cecco BS, Vielmo A, Lopes BC, Siqueira FM, Andrade CP, Snel GGM, Barros CSL, Sonne L, Pavarini SP, Driemeier D (2019). Mannheimia haemolytica pleuropneumonia in goats associated with shipping stress. Cienc. Rural, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20180621

• Thiry J, González-Martín JV, Elvira L, Pagot E, Voisin F, Lequeux G, Weingarten A, de Haas V (2014). Treatment of naturally occurring bovine respiratory disease in juvenile calves with a single administration of a florfenicol plus flunixin meglumine formulation Vet. Rec. 174: 430. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102017

• Ulevitch R, Tobias P (1995). Receptor-dependent mechanisms of cell stimulation by bacterial endotoxin. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13(1): 437-457. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.iy.13.040195.002253

• van der Burgt G, Clark W, Knight R (2007). Cattle fertility problems and Histophilus somni. Vet. Rec. 160(17): 600-600. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.160.17.600

• Wan FC, Zhang C, Jin Q, Wei C, Zhao HB, Zhang XL, You W, Liu XM, Liu GF, Liu YF, Tan XW (2019). Protective effects of astaxanthin on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in bovine endometrial epithelial cells. Biol. Reprod. 102: 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioz187

• Williams EJ, Fischer DP, Pfeiffer DU, England GC, Noakes DE, Dobson H, Sheldon IM (2005). Clinical evaluation of postpartum vaginal mucus reflects uterine bacterial infection and the immune response in cattle. Theriogenology, 63(1): 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.03.017

• Wilson BA, Ho M (2013). Pasteurella multocida: from zoonosis to cellular microbiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26(3): 631-655. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00024-13

• Yaman T, Büyükbayram H, Özyildiz Z, Terzi F, Uyar A, Keles ÖF, Özsoy ŞY, Yener Z (2018). Detection of bovine respiratory syncytial virus, Pasteurella multocida, and Mannheimia haemolytica by immunohistochemical method in naturally-infected cattle. J. Vet. Res. 62: 439-445. https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2018-0070

• Yates W (1982). A review of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, shipping fever pneumonia and viral-bacterial synergism in respiratory disease of cattle. Can. J. Comp. Med. 46(3): 225-263.

• Younan M, Fodor L (1995). Characterisation of a new Pasteurella haemolytica serotype (A17). Res. Vet. Sci. 58(1): 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5288(95)90097-7

• Zamri-Saad M, Azri A, Nurida A, Sheikh-Omar A (1994). Experimental respiratory infection of goats with Mycoplasma arginini and Pasteurella haemolytica A2. PERTANIKA, 17: 239-239.

• Zeng H, Pandher K, Murphy GL (1999). Molecular cloning of the Pasteurella haemolytica pomA gene and identification of bovine antibodies against PomA surface domains. Infect. Immun. 67(9): 4968. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.67.9.4968-4973.1999

• Zhang M, Hill JE, Godson DL, Ngeleka M, Fernando C, Huang Y (2020). The pulmonary virome, bacteriological and histopathological findings in bovine respiratory disease from western Canada. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 67: 924–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13419