Research Article

Yield and Fiber Quality Traits Study in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Using Line × Tester Analysis

Khunsa Khakwani1*, Muhammad Asif1, Zaheer Ahmed2, Ghulam Sarwar1, Yasmeen Abbassi2 and Ghulam Murtaza2

1Cotton Research Station, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan; 2The Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics,University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Received | January 27, 2022; Accepted | August 29, 2022; Published | September 08, 2022

*Correspondence | Khunsa Khakwani, Cotton Research Station, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Khakwani, K., M. Asif, Z. Ahmed, G. Sarwar, Y. Abbassi and G. Murtaza. 2022. Yield and fiber quality traits study in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using line × tester analysis. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 35(3): 541-546.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2022/35.3.541.546

Keywords | Fiber quality, Cotton varieties, Gene action, Heritability

Copyright: 2022 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Introduction

Dealing with the cotton needs of Pakistan’s textile industry the demand for good quality fiber has increased (Felker et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2009). According to an estimate by 2020, 20 million bales of cotton would be needed only for the textile industry in Pakistan. There is a need to focus on different fiber quality traits like length, strength, uniformity,and fiber fineness. It is very difficult to improve the fiber quality trait, as it is controlled by multiple genes (Lacape et al., 2005; Meredith Jr, 2005; Zhang et al., 2013).

A major portion of cotton is grown by these four countries: India, China, USA, and Pakistan. 2/3 part of the world’s cotton land is utilized by these countries (Dahab et al., 2013). Pakistan is the third major consumer of cotton while fourth-largest producer and the 7th largest cloth manufacturer in the World. 15% of Pakistan’s agricultural area is under cotton cultivation. Mostly, it is grown in the Punjab and Sindh provinces of Pakistan having 79% and 20% share, respectively (Ali et al., 2019). Tremendous efforts and progress have been made to increase cotton production, currently estimating around 685 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2019-20). This is better than the world average yield which is 581 kg/ha, but it is much lower than its potential (Mansoor et al., 2020).

Accomplishment of breeding program is majorly dependent on selection of parents (Liu et al., 2020; Solongi et al., 2019; Vavdiya et al., 2019; Isong et al., 2019). Choice of competent parents leads to a successful breeding program and, thereafter, To improve the fiber quality, it is necessary to focus on different characters such as: staple length, fineness, FS uniformity and maturity also (Ali et al., 2008). (Bowman et al., 1996), decrease in the yield and other parameters like fiber quality is due to less genetic variations. Introduction of new cultivars with modified genetic base is very important step in plant breeding. The lower genetic base creates problem for researchers (Qin et al., 2008). Therefore, it is very important for a breeder to have knowledge about variations and inheritance of different traits. Different methods are used to create variation, out of which, one is line × tester analysis. Line × tester analysis provides a way to investigate different characters by detecting suitable parents and crosses (Kempthorne, 1957). Line × Tester analysis is also helpful to provide knowledge about GCA and SCA for the parents and crosses. The main objective of this research work is to asses the GCA and SCA effects of fiber quality and yield related traits among eightcotton genotypes of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).

Materials and Methods

The experiment was conducted at the Cotton Research Station AARI, Faisalabad during 2020-21 in the field condtions. Sowing was done on the 2nd week of May. This material had diverse genetic back ground. The eight parents were crossed following the Line × Tester crssoing scheme for the estimation of heterosisand combining abilities for yield related and fiber quality traits. Five parents were used as female lines and other three parents were used as male testers. All the genotypes belonged to Gossypium hirsutum L. These eight genotypes were sown at optimum temperature 28°C in green house for suitable cotton germination. All genotypes were sown in pots, each containing 4 kg soil. 5 lines were crossed with three testers at the time of flowering. Eight parents along with fifteen crosses were field planted following three replications by using the randomized complete block design. Bed planting method was used in such a way that Plant × Plant and Row × Row distance followed 45 and 75cm, respectively. In each hole three seeds were sown and later on thinned after emergence.

Data recording

Data was recorded for different traits (PH, MB, SB, BP, BW, GOT, FF, FL, FS, SCY) by randomly selecting ten different cotton plants in a row for each trait and the average was estimated for statistical analysis. Plant height was recorded from first node to ceased apical bud in cm at the stage of ceased Plant growth. At every picking no. of bolls/plant were counted. After final picking no. of bolls at each picking were summed up and the average of no. of bolls/plant were estimated for each cultivar in one replication. Ten bolls were selected at random and weighed them separately. After that average weight of boll was estimated for each plant in a row in each replication. Clean sample of lint were collected from randomly selected bolls and fiber related traits were estimation with the help of high volume instrument (HVI) at Cotton Research Station AARI, Faisalabad.

Statistical analysis

Data from experiment were analyzed forn ANOVA given by (Steel et al., 1997). Traits that showed significant differences were further analyzed through for estimation of combining ability effects by Kempthorne (1957) and heterosis by Mather and Jinks (1982).

Results and Discussion

For hybrid development combining ability studies is a useful tool for parent lines selection. Eight parents evaluated for their general combining abilities for different characters in cotton. The results indicated that parent line FH-414 was thebest general combiner for PH, BW and FL. FH-415 showed good general combining ability for MB and FL. FH-490 found to be a good combiner for BP, GOT, and FF. The parental line FH-492 found to be good combiner for PH, SB, BP, BW and SCY. FH-ANMOL proved to be a very good general combiner for PH, SB, and SCY. These results indicated that these five lines FH-414, FH-415, FH-490, FH-492 and FH-ANMOL have desired traits for a breeder to exploit variability in the traits which are investigated here.

Among testers the NIAB-SANAM proved a good general combiner for PH and BP. CIM-602 found to be good combiner for SB, BP, BW, GOT, FS and SCY. EYE-111 found to be a good combiner for PH, GOT, BP, and FF.

Parents which have good GCA for a specific trait are expected to be give good yield in cross combinations (Khan et al., 1991; Ayub et al., 1991) and this trend is found in present studies for example FH-414 and CIM-602 indicated good general combining ability for PH and produced desired hybrids i.e. FH-414 × CIM-602 etc.

For PH FH-414 from lines and CIM-602 from testers was good general combiner for PH so these parents are supposed to be used in future breeding programs. The crosses FH-492 × CIM-602, FH-414 × CIM-602 (-15.956), FH-490 × EYE-111, FH-ANMOL × EYE-111 and FH-415 × NIAB-SANAM proved to be very good hybrids for PH. Both type of gene actions i.e. additive and non-additive found to be important for plant height (Khan, 2013; Neelima et al., 2004; Iqbal et al., 2003).

For MB the non-additive gene action is more important than additive type. These findings were reported by (Iqbal et al., 2003; Neelima et al., 2004; Kansik and Kapoor, 2006). These branches give bushy look to the plants which result in slow boll formation.

For SB, thenon-additive gene action is important than additive. Ahmad et al. (2000) and Subhan et al. (2000), described that the gene action of non-additive type is more imperative for SB. Greater the SB, the greater will be the fruiting, because plant enters into the fruiting stage earlier.

The testers EYE-111 and CIM-602 indicated positive GCA values which shown that these testers are the best general combiner for BP. For this trait non-additive genes are more important than additive genes. The findings of present study relate to the previous findings of (Neelima et al., 2004; Khan et al., 1991; Iqbal et al., 2005; Hassan et al., 1999; Murtaza et al., 1995; Rauf et al., 2005).

For FF the gene action of non-additive types were more important which relate to the findings of Khan et al. (1991). FL was also controlled by non-additive gene actions which confirm the findings of Sarwar et al. (2011). FS is mostly reported to be controlled by gene action of non-additive type which was also confirmed in the previous studies, Karademir and Gencer (2010) and Ilyas et al. (2007). Fiber properties are very important in outcome of spinning process.

Parental lines were good general combiners for a specific trait expected to produce good cross combinations (Khan et al., 1991). In the present study critical comparison of cross combinations give some interesting information. Some crosses with one parent have good GCA value and other parent have low GCA value for a particular trait showed best combinations for that trait. For example, FH-492 and CIM-602 showed poor combining ability for PH but they produced best combination with high PH. FH-415 and NIAB-SANAM cross combination was very good combination but this cross produced from parents with poor combining ability. FH-490 showed good general combining ability for GOT and NIAB-SANAM showed poor combining ability for this trait but their cross combination proved good for GOT. So it is cleared from these results that parents with poor combining abilities can produce desired hybrids for a specific trait which confirms the findings of Azhar and Rana (1993).

Parental lines play an important role towards variation in MB, number of sympodial branches, number of bolls/plant, boll weight, GOT, FL, FF and SCY which revealed maternal effects for these characters. Testers play an important role towards variation in PH, and FS. The contribution of both parents was found to be greater for variation in PH, MB, number of bolls/plant, boll weight, GOT, FF, FL and FS which relate to the results of Kannababu and Kavrkaratharaju (2000).

Conclusions and Recommendations

The dominant gene action is prevailing in all the genetypes and non-additive gene action is dominant over additive gene action therefore, heterosis breeding will be more fruitful than varietal development. Moreover, delayed selection must be favourable in breeding populations because non-additive genes have low heritability. The parents which have good general combining ability for specific traits and the cross combinations with good specific combining ability are supposed to be utilized in future breeding programs for the improvement of these traits in cotton.

Acknowledgement

The authors Acknowledge the research facilities provided by Cotton Research Station, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad.

Novelty Statement

The parents with good GCA for specific traits and the cross combinations with good SCA are important source to be utilized in future Cotton breeding programs for the improvement of yield and quality traits in cotton. These parents are yet not been reported for this kind of study before.

Author’s Contribution

YA and GM: Performed the experiment and collected data under the supervison of KK and GS.

MA: Managed overall crop and gave technical input.

KK and ZAZ: Helped in paper write up.

GM: performed the statistical analysis.

YA: Collected the literature.

GS and ZAZ: Supervised the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Ahmad, S., T.M. Khan and A.M. Khan. 2000. Genetic studies of some important quantitative characters in Gossypium hirsutum L. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 2: 121-124.

Ali, M.A., I.A. Khan, S.I. Awan, A. Shiraz and N. Shahid. 2008. Genetics of fiber qualitytraits in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Aust. J. Crop Sci., 2(1): 10-17.

Ali, M.A., J. Farooq, A. Batool, A. Zahoor, F. Azeem, A. Mahmood and K. Jabran. 2019. Cotton production in Pakistan. In: Cotton Production. Wiley. pp. 249-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119385523.ch12

Anonymous, 2019-2020. Economic survey of Pakistan. Government of Pakistan, Finance Division. Economic Advisor’s Wing. Islamabad.

Kumar, A.K. and R. Ravikesavan. 2008. Genetic studies of combining ability estimates for seed oil, seed protein and fibre quality traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Res. J. Agric. Biol., 4(6): 798-802.

Ashraf, S., A.H. Sangi, Z.Y. Hassan and M. Luqman. 2018. Future of cotton sector in Pakistan: A 2025 Outlook. Pak. J. Agric. Res., 31: 120-128. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2018/31.2.145.150

Ayub, M., S. Rahman and M. Amin, 1991.Combining ability analysis ofsomequality. Characters in various crosses of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Sarhad J. Agric., 7: 707-716.

Azhar, F.M. and A.H. Rana. 1993. Genetic analysis of three developmental plant characteristicsin upland cotton. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 30(4): 507-515.

Bowman, D.T., O.L. May and D.S. Calhoun. 1996. Genetic base of upland cotton cultivars released between 1970 and 1990. Crop Sci., 36(3): 577-581. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600030008x

Chen, X.S., X.J. Ma and Y.H. Liu. 2009. Analysis on linkage inheritance of sub-red plantmutant from upland cotton. Hereditas, 31(8): 855-858. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1005.2009.00855

Dahab, A.A., M. Saeed, B.B. Mohamed, M.A. Ashraf, A.N. Puspito, A. Shahid and S. Husnain. 2013. Genetic diversity assessment of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes from Pakistan using simple sequence repeat markers. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 7(2): 261-267.

Felker, G.S., C. Dugger and D. Richter. 2001. Fiber quality and new spinning technologies. 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York. pp. 9-13.

Hassan, G., G. Mahmood, N.U. Khan and A. Razzaq. 1999. Combining ability and heterobeltioticestimates in a diallel cross of cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Sarhad J. Agric., 15: 563-568.

Ilyas, M., M. Naveed, T.M. Khan and I.A. Khan. 2007. Combining ability studies in some quantitative and qualitative traits of Gossypium hirsutum L. J. Agric. Sci., 3(2): 39-42.

Iqbal, M., Chang, M.A., and M.Z. Iqbal. 2003. Breeding behavior effects for yield, its components and fiber quality in intraspecific crosses of cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Online J. Biol. Sci., 4: 451-459. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2003.451.459

Iqbal, M., R.S.A. Khan, K. Hayat and N.L. Khan. 2005. Genetic variation and combining ability foryield and fiber traits among cotton F1 hybrid population. J. Biol. Sci., 5: 713-716. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2005.713.716

lsong, A., A. Balu, C. Isong and E. Bamishaiye. 2019. Estimation of heterosis and combining ability in interspecific cotton hybrids. Electron. J. Plant Breed., 10: 82-837.

Kannababu, N. and T.V. Karivaratharaju. 2000. Maternal influence of cytoplasmic genic male sterile lines on seed quality in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Ind. J. Pl. Physiol., 5(2): 159-162.

Kansik, S.K. and C.J. Kapoor. 2006. Combining ability analysis in upland cotton. Natl. J. Plant Imp., 8(1): 32-38.

Karademir, E. and O. Gencer. 2010. Combining ability and aeterosis for yield and fiber quality properties in cotton (G. hirsutum L.) obtained by half diallel mating design. Notulae Botanicae Hortic. Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca, 38(1): 222-227.

Kempthorne, O.J., 1957. A biometrics invited paper: Logical, epistemological and statistical aspects of nature-nurture data interpretation. Biometrics, 3(1): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529584

Khan, M.A., K.L. Cheema, A. Masood and H.A. Sadaqat, 1991. Combiningability studies in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Agric. Res., 29: 311-318.

Khan, N.U., 2013. Combining ability analysis in intra specific Fl diallel cross of upland cotton. Sci. Pap. A Agron., 56: 289-295.

Lacape, J.M., T.B. Nguyen, B. Courtois, J.L. Belot, M. Giband, J.P. Gourlot, G. Gawryziak-Roques and B.J.C.S. Hau. 2005. QTL analysis of cotton fiber quality using multiple Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense backcross generations. Crop Sci., 45(1): 123-140. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0123a

Liu, J., M. Li, Q. Zhang, X. Wei and X. Huang. 2020. Exploring the molecular basis of heterosis for plant breeding. J. Integr. Plant Biol., 62: 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12804

Lsong, A, A. Balu, C. Isong and E. Bamishaiye. 2019. Estimation of heterosis and combining ability in interspecific cotton hybrids. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 10: 82-837. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2019.00110.8

Mansoor, S., S. Bashir and M. Zubair. 2020. Is Bt gene cotton adoption paying off farmers in Pakistan Asian Dev. Policy Rev., 8: 30-41. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.107.2020.81.30.41

Mather, K. and J.L. Jinks. 1982. Biometrieal genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.

Meredith, Jr, W.J.C.S., 2005. Registration of md 52ne high fiber quality cotton germplasm and recurrent parent md 90ne. Crop Sci., 45(2): 807-809. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0807

Murtaza, N., A.A. Khan and K.T. Ashrat. 1995. Assessment of gene action in some quantitative characters of upland cotton. J. Anim. Plant. Sci., 5: 33-35.

Neelima, S., V.C. Reddy and A.N. Reedy. 2004. Combining ability studies for yield and yield components in American cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Ann. Agr. Biol. Res., 9: 1-6.

Nimbalkar, R.D., A.C. Jadhav and S.S. Mehetra. 2004. Combining ability studies in desi cotton (G. arboretum and G. herbaceum). J. Maharastra Agric. Univ., 29(2): 166-170.

Qin, H., W. Guo, Y.M. Zhang, T.J. Zhang and A. Genetics. 2008. Qtl mapping of yield and fiber traits based on a four-way cross population in Gossypium arboreum L. Theor. Appl. Genet., 117(6): 883-894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0828-x

Rauf, S., T.M. Khan and S. Nazir. 2005. Combining ability and heterosis in Gossypium hirsutum L. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 7(1): 109-113.

Sarwar, G., M. Baber, N. Hussain, I.A. Khan, M. Naeem, M.A. Ullah and A.A. Khan. 2011. Genetic dissection of yield and its components in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Afr. J. Agric. Res., 6(11): 2527-2531.

Shuli, F., A.H. Jarwar, X. Wang, L.Wang and Q. Ma. 2018. Overview of the cotton in Pakistan and its future prospects. Pakistan J. Agric. Res., 31: 426-435. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2018/31.4.396.407

Solongi, N., W.A. Jatoi, M.J. Baloch, M. Siyal, A.H. Solangi and S. Memon. 2019. Heterosis and combining ability estimates for assessing potential parents to develop Fl hybrids in upland cotton. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 29: 1362-1373.

Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biological approach, McGraw-Hill.

Subhan, M., H.U. Khan and R. Ahmad. 2000. Comparison of the gene action controlling metriccharacters in Upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Pak. J. Biol.Sci., 3: 2087-2090. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2000.2087.2090

Vavdiya, P.A., V.P. Chovatia, R.B. Madariya and H.V. Solanki. 2019. Heterosis studies for seed cotton yield and its components over environments in cotton. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 8: 2049-2053.

Zhang, T., N. Qian, X. Zhu, H. Chen, S. Wang, H. Mei and Y.O. Zhang. 2013. Variations and transmission of QTL alleles for yield and fiber qualities in upland cotton cultivars developed in china. PLoS One, 8(2): e57220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057220