Research Article

The Effect of Pomegranate Peel on Soybean Meal Protein Degradation and Milk Production in Dairy Cows

Soliman Mohammed Soliman1*, Mohsen Mahmoud Shoukry2, Ahmed Mohammed El-Okazy1, Ahmed Mahmoud El-Morsy1, Mahmoud Mohammed Soliman1

1Regional Centre for Food and Feed, Agriculture Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Egypt; 2Animal Production Dept. ,National Research Centre,Dokki ,Cairo,Egypt.

Received | January 09, 2022; Accepted | April 14, 2022; Published | June 15, 2022

*Correspondence | Soilman M.S., Regional Centre for Food and Feed, Agriculture Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Egypt; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Soilman MS, Shoukry MM, El-Okazy AM, El-Morsy AM, Soliman MM (2022). The effect of pomegranate peel on soybean meal protein degradation and milk production in dairy cows. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 10(6):1350-1361.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2022/10.6.1350.1361

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316

Copyright: 2022 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

INTRODUCTION

In ruminants, the amount of protein that beneficial utilization takes place from dietary protein and microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. The quality of dietary protein is determined by the extent to which it contains balanced amino acids and the quantity of protein escapes from rumen degradation without decreasing digestibility in the small intestine. Improvement in milk production requires more intakes of crude protein in the diet, and an increase of amino acids (AAs) delivered to the intestine in order to meet the animal’s needs for milk and milk protein synthesis, Katongole and Yan (2020). According to Savari et al. (2017), increased rumen un-degradable protein (RUP) dairy cow diets result in increased absorption of AA profiles and consistently improved lactation performance. Soybean meal (SBM) is the main source of protein used to feed farm animals. It’s about two-thirds of the total protein feed in the world. The nutritive value is incomparable to any other plant protein source, and it is the standard to which other protein sources are compared due to its containing good amino acid balance (Tangendjaja, 2020). SBM is an important part of the diets of ruminants due to its high amount of protein 43-53%, while its high amount of protein is rumen-degradable (more than 60%), which may not supply enough un-degraded intake protein and AA to meet the demands of highly productive animals. Therefore, many methods have been tested to develop techniques that focus on increasing the rumen by-pass of soybean meal protein (Brown and Bradford, 2020; Prasetiyono et al., 2018; Bilal et al., 2020). Thermal processes such as heating or chemical treatments like formaldehyde, NaOH, xylose, tannins, alkalis, and encapsulation with zein or fat (Castro et al., 2008; Colmenero et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2002) Pomegranate peel (Punica granatum) is considered as an agro-industrial waste from pomegranate fruit. Pomegranate peels contain a high concentration of phytochemicals with promising bioactive properties, including tannins, gallic acid, and others. These compounds have potent antioxidant, inflammatory, antimicrobial, and other biological effects, Shokoh et al. (2020). According to the Egyptian Agriculture Ministry (2017), the productivity of pomegranate fruit is approximately 91 thousand tons. The peel accounts for 40–60% of the fruit. Tannins are phenolic that have been shown to reduce ruminal degradation of protein because of their ability to form complexes with protein (Andrej and Alenka, 2021). They can form bonds with proteins at ruminal pH 6-7, preventing bacterial proteolysis, but the bonds dissociate at abomasum pH 3-4 and allow the amino acid release, resulting in increased protein utilization with lower rumen ammonia concentrations. Also, absorption of essential AA from the small intestine increased (Barry and McNabb, 1999). The possible effects of tannins have the ability to modify rumen fermentation and inhibit some of the rumen microorganisms Juan et al. (2020), to decrease emissions of enteric methane. Tannins are able to reduce methane production in the rumen directly or indirectly by either inhibiting methanogens or protozoal activity, respectively (Naumann et al., 2017). The natural origin of tannins as natural alternatives to improve animal performance is better accepted as feed additives than synthetic compounds. However, the balance between optimum levels of effective and potentially anti-nutritional doses is delicate. Therefore, the aim of this study was conducted in two trials. In the first trial, the effect of different levels of pomegranate peel on ruminal in situ degradability of SBM protein, and identified the optimum level for reducing degradability was investigated. The second trial selects the best two levels to determine their effect on the in vitro total gas production and in vitro methane production, as well as the determined parameters for rumen liquor fermentation in vivo, microbial protein synthesis and milk production in dairy cows.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment took place from October 2020 to May 2021 at the Noubaria station farm in El-Beheira governorate.

In situ trials

This experiment was designed in two trials. The first trial was conducted to determine the effects of different levels of PP on soybean meal degradability. The second trial selected the optimal levels of PP that have affected on decreased SBM ruminal degradability to determine their effect on in vitro total gas production and methane production, as well as determined in vivo parameters of rumen liquor fermentation, microbial protein synthesis, and milk production in dairy cows. Pomegranate peel was prepared by drying in an incubator at room temperature and milling through a 2 mm mesh. Also, SBM was milled through a 2 mm mesh. Pomegranate peel powder was added to SBM at levels of 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 gm /1000 gm SBM. Table 1 showed chemical composition of SBM and PP.

First trial, three female sheep fitted with permanent rumen fistula (with an average of 52 kg ± 1.50 live body weight) were used to determine the rumen degradability SBM of DM and CP. Sheep were fed 60% of Egyptian clover hay and 40% of a commercial concentrate diet containing 14% CP.

Total phenolic content (TPC) was determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method as described by Singleton et al. (1999) total flavonoid content was determined using a colorimetric assay, as described by Dewi and Riska (2019), and tannins were determined according to Makkar (2003).

Two polyester bags (100 % Dacron polyester 7 X 15 cm) with a mean pore size of 45 µm were used at each incubation time. Dry the ground samples in an oven at 60–65°C overnight to determine the DM, approximately 3 g of DM of sample in each nylon bag. Bags were then incubated in the rumen of each sheep and removed after 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hrs. After the removal of the bags from the rumen, they were washed under a gently flowing tap water until the fluid was clear. Bags were drained, and dried at 60°C for 48 hrs. DM and CP content were estimated according to the method of AOAC (2005). Two bags were washed in running water for 15 min. to determine the initial soluble fraction at 0 time. The kinetics of DM and CP disappearances was studied by fitting the individual values to the following model of equation proposed by Orskov and McDonald (1979).

 

Table 1: Chemical composition (%DM) of pomegranate peel (PP) and soybean meal (SBM) treated with PP.

Item	PP	PP-0	PP-50	PP-100	PP-150	PP-200	PP-250
OM %	91.58	94.60	94.65	94.55	94.55	94.60	49.55
CP %	8.51	46.50	45.7٠	44.3٠	43.4٠	42.1٠	40.٢٠
CF %	16.94	3.80	4.40	4.83	5.31	5.70	6.30
NDF %	35.43	12.50	13.62	14.9	١٦.١4	17.20	17.90
ADF %	22.10	6.42	7.51	8.24	8.7	9.43	10.20
Fat %	2.33	3.10	3.01	3.00	3.00	3.10	3.20
Total phenolic contents*	185.4	--	9.33	17. 72	24.31	30.76	37.13
Flavonoids **	2928	---	147.50	273.30	381.32	467.78	587.21
Total tannins ***	141.4	---	7.23	13.16	18.52	22.46	28.41

 

OM= organic matter; CP= crude protein; CF= crude fibre; NDF= neutral detergent fibre and ADF= acid detergent fibre. * Total phenolic contents mg gallic acid equivalents /g of dry weight PP. **Flavonoids mg quercetin equivalent /kg of dry weight PP. *** Total tannin mg/g dry weight.

 

Y = a + b (1–e–ct)

Y= degradability at time (t); a= water-soluble and rapidly degradable fraction; b= potentially degradable fraction; c= rate of degradation of b.

The effective rumen degradability (ED) was estimated according to Orskov and McDonald (1979). Rumen out flow rate (k) was assumed to be 0.05 per hour for concentrate (McDonald, 1981a).

ED = a + bc/c+k

Feed intake, milk sampling and milk composition

Second trial, eighteen multiparous lactating crossbred Friesian cows were assigned randomly into three groups (6cows/each treatment) stratified by live body weight (535 ± 7.5 kg). Each group was fed one from three total mixed rations (TMR) designed to containing 55%:45% concentrate: roughage to meet their nutrient requirements according to NRC (2001) recommendations. Table 2 illustrated the ingredients and chemicals composition of three rations. Each concentrate diet containing 15% soybean meal treated with 0, 200, 250 gm PP/kg SBM.

Feed intake was recorded daily by weighing the offered rations and refusals from the previous day. Diets were offered twice a day at 07:00 and 19:00 pm. Samples of TMR were taken daily, dried at 60°C in a forced-air oven for 48 h (AOAC, 2005) and proximate analysis of the samples for ash, crude protein, fiber, fat and nitrogen free extract contents were determined as described by AOAC (2005). While, fiber fraction (NDF and ADF) were determined according to Van Soest et al. (1991).

The milk production experiment started after 6 weeks of calving, and the cows lasted for 4 weeks as a preliminary period followed by milk collection. Milk samples were

 

Table 2: Ingredients and chemical composition of the total mixed ration.

Item	Control	PP-200	PP-250
Ingredients (g kg-1 DM)
Corn silage	400	400	400
Rice straw	50	50	50
Sunflower meal	90	90	90
Corn	127	127	127
Sugar beet pulp	45	15	7.5
Wheat bran	120	120	120
Soybean meal ground (46.5% CP)	150	150	150
Calcium carbonate	12	12	12
*Vitamin-mineral premix and salt	6	6	6
**Pomegranate peel	---	30	37.5
Chemical composition (% DM)
Dry matter	67.10	67.10	67.10
Crude protein	16.17	16.17	16.17
Ether extract	2.8	2.8	2.8
Nitrogen free extract (NFE)	54.6	54.6	54.6
Neutral detergent fibre	32.44	32.38	32.30
Acid detergent fibre	19.31	19.28	19.25
Tannin mg/g DM	0.0140	0.468	0.585

 

* Supplied per kilogram of premix (Kav): Vitamin A 12 000 000 IU, Vitamin D3 3 000 000 IU, Vitamin E 30 mg, Mn 50 mg, Fe 50 mg, Zn 50 mg, Cu 10 mg, I 0.8 mg, Se 0.15 mg, antioxidant 10 mg. **The added of pomegranate peel to soybean meal has been taken from the sugar beet pulp content due to their closeness in terms of protein (8.5- 8.9) and metabolizable energy(301-298)for pomegranate peel and sugar beet pulp respectively.

 

collected from the eleventh week to the twentieth week. Cows were machine milked twice daily at 06:00 and 18:00 pm, and samples were collected at each milking (1% from total milk of each period). A mixed sample of milk was taken daily. Milk composition (fat, total protein, lactose, and total solids) and somatic cell count (SCC) of milk samples were determined using MilkoScan FT 6000. Average yields of each milk component were calculated for individual cows by multiplying milk yield by the component content (g/kg) of milk. Fat corrected milk (4 %) was calculated according to Gaines and Davidson, (1923) using the following equation:

FCM4% = M (0.4+0.15 F %)

Where M= milk yield, F = fat percentage. Milk energy value (E) was calculated according to Kleiber et al. (1961):

E (kcal/kg) = (% fat × 92) + (% protein × 58.6) + (% lactose × 39.5).

Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) was determined using enzymatic methods described by İnal et al (2015), and sample absorbance at 625 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer.

Rumen parameters, and microbial nitrogen (MN) synthesized

Ruminal fluid contents were sampled at 0 time before feeding and at 3 and 6 h after the morning feeding using stomach tubing from cows that fed experimental diets after 20 d as adaptation period the samples collected for 3 days. Approximately 100 mL of rumen fluid were collected from each treatment (the same cows used in the lactation trials) and strained through 4 layers of cheesecloth. The supernatant was used for determination pH immediately using Orian 2 stars digital. Approximately 10 ml of the sample was preserved with 2-3 drops of formalin to prevent fermentation. Ammonia-N (NH3-N) was determined according to method AOAC (2005). The concentration of total volatile fatty acids (TVFA) was determined according Anderson and Yang (1992). Concentration and molar proportions of individual VFA were measured by gas-liquid chromatography.

MN synthesized was determined according to Chen and Gomes (1992). Equations used to calculate microbial nitrogen (MN) as follows:

MN = (70 × AP) / (0.83 × 0.116 × 1000)

Where, 70 represent the amount of N in the purines (mg N/mmol), 0.83 is the digestibility of the microbial purines, and 0.116 is the purine N: total N ratio in ruminal microorganisms. The absorbed microbial purines (AP, mmol/day) are calculated from the total excretion of purine derivatives (PD, mmol/day), using the equation:

AP = {PD – (0.385 × BW0.75)} / 0.85

where 0.85 is the recovery of absorbed purines as urinary purine derivatives and 0.385 * BW0.75 is the endogenous contribution in the urinary excretion of PD (Verbic et al., 1990).

In vitro measurement of gas and methane production

In vitro gas production was determined as described by (Menke and Steingass, 1988). Rumen fluid was collected before feeding in the morning using stomach tubing from cows fed a TMR. Samples of diets (200±10 mg) of the oven-dry feedstuffs and the respective mixtures were accurately weighed into 100-ml glass syringes fitted with plungers. In-vitro incubation was conducted in three run involving quintuplicate samples. Syringes were filled with 30 ml of medium consisting of 10 ml of rumen fluid and 20 ml of buffer solution. Cumulative gas production was recorded at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. Total gas values were corrected for the blank incubation, and reported gas values are expressed in ml per 200 mg of DM. Gas production was fitted to the non-linear equation model of exponential (EXP0) by Schofield et al. (1994).

EXP V = VF (1−exp (−kt))

Where: V: is the cumulative gas production (in ml) at different incubation times, VF: final asymptotic gas volume.

VF= V final - V0 - GP0

Where; V final = the final volume of gas recorded at the end of incubation time; V0 = the initial volume of gas recorded before incubation starts; GP0= the mean blank value. K= fractional rate of gas production, t= incubation time (h). The fractional rate (μ, h-1). Where, μ= the point of inflection of the gas curve at time t.

Methane was measured by taking 1 ml from headspace gas from each syringe after incubation time at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours by evacuated vials and injecting it into gas chromatography (GC) with flame ionisation detection. To collect gas samples from each syringe, the syringe (100 ml) used in trial gas production must be equipped with three-way taps (Luer-Lock) and pre-evacuated exetainers.

In-vitro dry matter and organic matter digestibility were calculated by a modified Tilley and Terry (1963) technique.

Statistical analysis

Data were subjected to analysis as a completely randomized design with repeated measures using the MIXED procedure of SAS 2002 (Version 9.2) Statistical processes were carried out using the General Linear. The model describing each trait was assumed to be:

Yijkl = µ + Ti + a (T) IJ+ WK+ Eijkl

Where; Yijkl= Parameter under analysis; µ = Overall mean; Ti = The fixed effect of treatment; a (T) IJ = The random effect of animal (j) nested within treatment (i); WK = The fixed effect of week when K = 1, 2,…., 8; Eijkl = random error. Significant differences among means were separated using the least significance difference (LSD) Duncan’s multiple range tests.

RESULTS and Discussion

Rumen degradation kinetics

Data in Table 3 showed the effects of adding pomegranate peel on the in-situ DM and CP soybean meal degradability. The results indicated that there was a linear inverse relationship between increasing levels of PP and decreased CP and DM degradation. The lowest (P<0.05) values of CP or DM degradability were recorded with treatment PP-250, followed by PP-200. The reduction of crude protein degradation was 26.30–29.50% for PP-200 and PP-250, respectively. At levels PP-200 and PP-250, the reduction in DM degradation was 20.40–24.60%, respectively. There is a significant correlation between increasing the addition of level PP and decreasing the degradability parameters. The water-soluble fraction (rapidly degradable fraction) ’a’, potentially degradable fraction ’b’, and the rate of degradation fraction ’c’ showed a reduction effect by adding pomegranate peel to soybean meal. Moreover, the results showed that increasing levels of supplementation of pomegranate peel led to an increase in the escape CP and DM of SBM from degradation. The lowest (P<0.05) values of fractions “a”, “b,” and “c” were shown with SBM treated with pomegranate peel at levels of PP-250 and PP-200. In accordance with these degradation parameters, the reduction of degradation of the SBM was significantly (P<0.05) affected by the PP treatment, especially at levels PP-250 and PP-200.

Ruminal fermentation parameters

The results of ruminal fermentation parameters are shown in Table 4. Treatment of SBM with PP at levels of PP-200 and PP-250 led to a numerical increase in pH without significant differences (P<0.05). The results of total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration showed a significant (P<0.05) reduction with diets that included pomegranate peel. The addition of PP at levels of 200 or 250 to SBM contributed to reduced (P<0.05) TVFA concentration and molar proportions of acetate, propionate, and butyrate. The lowest value of VFA was shown with diet PP-250. However, the treatment of SBM with PP had no effect on the acetate to propionate ratio. Ammonia production was reduced (P<0.05) by increasing the level of PP (from PP-200 to PP-250) compared to the control. The diets containing SBM treatment with PP had a significant (P<0.05) decrease in microbial nitrogen production by 5.40 and 6.00% for diets including PP at levels 200 and 250, respectively. In although, the actual lower ammonia-N concentration was still sufficient for microbial nitrogen synthesis.

The effect of the addition of pomegranate peel to SBM on in-vitro gas production and methane production has been shown in Table 4. Significant differences between diets containing SBM treated with PP and untreated, but no differences between two levels of PP addition. Gas production was decreased by 20.9 and 22.8% by the addition of PP at levels of 200 and 250, respectively. Also, the addition of PP at level 250 or 200 significantly decreased (P<0.05) CH4 production by 30.3% and 26.5%, respectively.

The results of in-vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and in-vitro organic matter (IVOMD) digestibility are shown in Table 4. The results illustrated a slight increase without significant differences (P<0.05) with diets containing PP compared to control diets.

Dry matter intake, mike yield and milk composition

The effect of treating SBM with pomegranate peel on dry matter intake (DMI) is presented in Table 5. The addition of pomegranate peel at levels of 200 or 250 to the diets had no influence on dry matter intake (DMI). Cows fed a diet containing SBM treated with PP or those fed a control diet showed no significant differences (P<0.05).

The milk yield was increased in dairy cows fed diets containing SBM treated with PP at levels of 200 or 250, by 2.70% and 3.50%, respectively, but the differences were not significant (P<0.05). In the same trend, milk protein concentration was enhanced by 0.94% and by 1.25%, respectively. While milk fat content decreased by about 1.92%, with no statistically significant differences (P< 0.05). However, the milk lactose content was the same between cows fed diets containing PP or those fed a control diet.

Milk urea nitrogen reflects the amount of urea found in milk. Milk urea nitrogen is used as a management tool to optimize dairy herd nutrition and monitor the nutritional condition of lactation dairy cows. The addition of PP to dairy cow diets had a negative significant (P < 0.05) effect on milk urea nitrogen (MUN). It decreased by 9.85% and 10.40% in the diets PP-200 and PP-250, respectively. Also, cows fed a diet containing SBM treated with PP showed a significantly decreased SCC compared to those fed a control diet. Generally, despite the significant decrease in MUN and SCC, treating SBM with PP did not affect a significant increase in milk yield, milk fat, or milk protein concentration.

 

Table 3: In situ degradation for soybean meal treated with pomegranate peel.

Item	PP-0	PP-50	PP-100	PP-150	PP-200	PP-250	SEM	P-value
Dry matter degradability
a	31.35a	30.84a	29.35ab	28.96b	27.24c	26.47c	0.77	0.009
b	67.08a	65.17a	62.60ab	56.41b	52.20c	50.06c	1.43	0.022
c	0.065a	0.064a	0.062a	0.059b	0.057b	0.053c	0.08	0.004
EDDM	69.26a	67.43a	63.95ab	59.49b	55.15c	52.23c	0.172	0.006
Crude protein degradability
a	27.09a	26.34a	24.22ab	22.47b	20.86b	20.44b	0.61	0.006
b	75.05a	70. 49a	67.73ab	62.80b	57.41c	55.03c	4.83	0.022
c	0.060a	0.059a	0.057a	0.055ab	0.052b	0.05b	0.06	0.007
EDCP	68.02a	64.50a	60.30b	55.37b	50.13c	47.96c	2.25	0.038

 

EDDM: The effective rumen degradability of dry matter. EDCP: The effective rumen degradability of crude protein. SEM: standard error of the means; significant (P < 0.05) a, b and c: means in the same row with different superscripts are differ significantly. a: the water-soluble fraction; b: the potentially degradable fraction and c: the rate of degradation.

 

Table 4: Rumen fermentation, microbial nitrogen of lactating crossbred Friesian cows feed rations.

Item	Control	PP-200	PP-250	SEM	P-value
In vivo ruminal Mean pH	6.48	6.63	6.65	0.57	0.076
In vivo ruminal Mean NH3-N (mg L−1)	13.66 a	11.38 b	10.41b	1.32	0.025
In vivo TVFA* (mmol L−1)	106.22a	102.71b	99.96b	4.73	0.027
Acetic, C2 (ml/100ml)	65.33a	60.11b	59.87b	3.57	0.014
Propionic,C3 (ml/100ml)	26.13a	24.83b	24.65b	0.69	0.017
Butyric, C4 (ml/100mll)	13.53a	11.46b	11.28b	0.44	0.043
C2:C3 ratio	2.50	2.42	2.43	0.06	0.088
PD (mmol/day) **	136.17a	131.13b	130.60b	7.57	0.039
microbial nitrogen g/day	79.84a	75.53b	75.07b	0.57	0.023
IVDMD***	65.01	65.79	66.41	1.38	0.058
IVOMD****	62.01	62.35	62.88	2.66	0.078
Rates of gas production	0.0727a	0.0613b	0.0587b	0.054	0.0032
Total gas production (ml/200mg DM)	60.02a	47.46b	46.35b	5.54	0.021
Methane production at 24 h (ml/200mg DM)	10.16a	7.47b	7.08b	2.93	0.006

 

SEM, Standard error of the mean. a and b: means in the same row with different superscripts are differ significantly (P< 0.05). *TVFA= Total volatile fatty acid; ** PD= Purine derivatives (allantoin and uric acid in urine); ***IVDMD= In vitro dry matter digestibility and ****IVOMD = In vitro organic matter digestibility.

 

Table 5: Dry matter intake, milk yield and milk composition of lactating crossbred Friesian cows feed rations (mean ± SE).

Item	Control	PP-200	PP-250	SEM	P-value
DMI, kg/d	19.15	18.92	18.87	3.39	0.058
Milk yield, kg/d	18.80	19.32	19.46	2.73	0.072
4 % FCM	17.67	18.10	18.23	0.19	0.117
Fat, kg/d	0.690	0.690	0.696	0.27	0.195
Milk composition (%)
Total solids	11.79	11.73	11.76	0.45	0.720
Fat	3.65	3.58	3.58	0.78	0.068
Protein	3.20	3.23	3.24	0.26	0.082
Lactose	4.25	4.24	4.24	0.73	0.077
Ash	0.69	0.68	0.70	0.04	0.081
MUN mg/dl*	14.01b	12.63a	12.56a	1.38	0.034
SCC × 103/mL**	83.60a	75.70b	75.10b	5.31	0.041
Milk energy content (kcal/kg)	691.20	687.94	689.70	0.07	0.068

 

SEM, standard error of the mean. a and b: means in the same row with different superscripts are differ significantly (P< 0.05). *DMI= dry matter intake, ** 4%FCM= fat correct milk 4%, *** MUN=milk urea nitrogen and ****SCC= somatic cell count.

 

Rumen degradation kinetics

The effective degradability (ED) of DM and CP was calculated at k = 5% h-1 according to (NRC, 1985). The reduction of CP degradability was greater than the reduction of DM degradability at the same level of PP, due to the presence of tannins in PP that may have the ability to complex primarily with proteins, and to a lesser extent with polysaccharides and other organic compounds. (Makkar, 2003). The processes of tannin-protein binding are influenced by the relative concentration of both tannins and protein (Hagerman and Butler, 1981) and are dependent upon the pH value. Many studies (Andrej and Alenka, 2021; Makkar, 2003; Arisya et al., 2019) found that tannin-protein binding is more stable in the rumen and resistant to rumen microorganism degradation at pH (5.0 to 7.0). However, it dissociates in gastric juice (abomasum pH 2-3), Oh and Hoff (1987); and Priolo et al. (2000). Therefore, an increase in the inclusion of pomegranate peel into SBM leads to decreased CP and DM rumen degradability. Our results support those of Basria et al. (2021), Heendeniya et al. (2012), and Alipour and Rouzbahan (2010), who observed that tannin-treated SBM decreased CP and DM degradability, whereas the escape degradation of CP was greater than DM. According to Hvelplund and Weisbjerg (2000), small particle loss, especially formed during sample preparation, affects fraction “a”. The pomegranate peel was finely ground. Therefore, an increase in the pomegranate peel levels may be led to an increase in the loss of small particles, which caused a decrease in fraction “a”, which agreed with previous studies by McDonnell et al. (2017) who suggested that the small particles might easily escape from a nylon bag. According to the findings, tannins in PP decreased the rate of degradation and fraction “b.” That was probably due to the ability of phenolic groups of tannins establish hydrogen bonds with the NH groups of peptides or proteins, which are not broken by rumen microorganism, Basria et al. (2021), Alipour and Rouzbehan (2010), Furthermore, tannins can interfere with the action of extracellular microbial enzymes, inhibiting their activity, Panel et al. (2018).

Ruminal fermentation parameters, microbial nitrogen syntheses, in-vitro gas production and methane and in-vitro digestibility

The ruminal pH values were within the normal range of 6.48–6.65 for physiological rumen activity reported by Van Soest (1994). The addition of PP to SBM showed a slight increase in pH. That may be due to tannins, which have been shown to have an insignificant increase, Bhatta et al. (2015) in ruminal pH. This is consistent with findings in the decrease of total VFA concentrates in rumen but the increase in pH was limited, probably due to the buffering capacity of saliva reported by Bechir et al. (2021). The TVFA and ammonia concentrations were reduced due to the treated SBM with PP, Tan et al. (2011) reported that adding tannins to ruminant diets had a negative impact on rumen fermentation, decreasing NH3-N and TVFA concentrations. The reduction of TVFA may be attributed to tannins having the potential to decrease the rumen digestion of carbohydrates and hemicellulose. Although this was countered by increased post-ruminal digestion, Hariadi et al. (2010) suggest that tannins form unfermentable complexes with substrates (carbohydrates, hemicelluloses) Kelln et al. (2020). Tannins also have the ability to decrease the activity of some species of rumen microorganisms Panel et al. (2018). This decreases the activity of rumen microorganisms, which may have an effect on organic matter fermentation. Therefore, a decrease in VFA concentrations may be linked to reduced organic matter fermentation. Also, the tannin-protein complex had a negative effect on proteolysis that may be responsible for the decrease in ammonia concentration, Dschaak et al. (2011). In terms of the acetate: propionate, it’s indeed unaffected by adding pomegranate peel. Similarly, Hassanat and Chaouki (2012) observed that adding chestnut containing tannins at levels of 100, 150, and 200 g kg1 SBM had no effect on the acetate to propionate ratio when compared to the control. In addition, McSweeneye et al. (2001) found that avalonea, sumach, grape seed, and myrobalan enhanced acetate production when included in ruminant diets. This could be attributed to Ng et al. (2015) hypothesis that homoacetogens could use H2 in combination with CO2 to produce acetate. Thus, if less H2 is converted to CH4 by inhalation of methanogense, then more H2 is available for producing acetate. Previous in-vitro studies have indicated that supplemented tannins may reduce organic matter, and protein degradability in the rumen, consequently decreasing TVFA production, Bueno et al. (2020).

Since the PP treatment reduces the efficacy of microbial protein synthesis, these results are consistent with those of Gerlach et al. (2018) and Dickhoefer et al. (2016) who found a reduction in microbial protein synthesis when the cows fed diets containing tannin at 1.5% of DM. However, the decline was 16%, higher than found in our results. This could be due to higher levels of tannins in diets than those used in our studies. Our finding is considered compatible with the decrease in ammonia-N concentration but suggests that the reduction of rumen ammonia-N concentration was still sufficient for microbial protein synthesis.

The results of in-vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and in-vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) are supported by the results shown by Gerlach et al. (2018) and Andrej and Alenka (2021), who found that there was no effect of tannins on the in-vitro digestibility. Tannin consistently promoted the duodenal flow of OM and non-ammonia non-microbial N (NANMN) while reducing rumen OM and feed protein degradability. According to Fitriastuti et al. (2019), this may enhance the digestibility of OM post-rumen, implying that OM digestion has been compensated for and extended throughout the abomasum and intestines. This result contradicts results found by Ramos et al. (2020), who showed a significant decrease in the total digestibility and bioavailability of nutrients, while Basri et al. (2021) found a significant increase in total apparent digestibility.

A negative correlation exists between adding pomegranate peel to ruminat diets and CH4 production. Tannins have the ability to reduce gas production due to their potential biological impact on rumen fermentation and effect on rumen microbiota, Bueno et al. (2008). According to Naumann et al. (2017), tannins have the ability to reduce methane production in the rumen either directly by inhibiting rumen methanogenic bacteria by adhesin of the microbial cell wall and inhibition their enzymes, or indirectly by reducing the availability of nutrients (i.e., carbohydrates, protein, and fiber) to rumen microorganisms, which may impair the rumen microbial population. Addition of pomegranate peel (PP) had a significant effect on modification in the rumen ecosystem via tannins, which have the potential to inhibit methanogens (Gunun et al., 2018) and then reduce methane emissions and total gas production. All previous studies have confirmed that tannin plants were effective in reducing in vitro CH4 production. The tannins have been proposed to directly inhibit some ruminal specialized bacteria, and methanogen population inhibition (up to 36%) has been reported by Costa et al. (2018). However, Bhatta et al. (2015) suggested that tannins directly reduce methanogen activity and, therefore, they might affect the abundance of methanogens through their effect on the decreased availability of hydrogen for rumen microorganisms. This may be achieved without significantly affecting the other rumen fermentation parameters.

Dry matter intake, mike yield and milk composition

Dry matter intake (DMI) was unaffected by the addition of pomegranate peel to the diet. Our results were confirmed by other studies that reported a non-detrimental effect of tannin on ruminant intake. According to Benchaar et al. (2008), adding tannins to the diet at a concentration of 0.5 percent DM had no effect on feed consumption. Morover, Ramos et al. (2020) found tannins had no effect when added at 0.75%. On the contrary, when Ramos et al. (2020) added tannins at 2.2% to Nellore cows’ diets, the DMI was reduced because it is known that tannins influence ruminant palatability. Also, Beauchemin et al. (2007) observed that adding 2% DM tannins to cow diets resulted in a decrease in dry matter consumption.

Dairy cow feeding regimes must provide adequate protein quality and quantity to produce dairy cows to meet the request for milk yield. Dairy cows need both high quality protein and high quantities of protein to produce milk, since the SBM treated with PP provides an adequate amount of high quality RUP (rumen un-degradable protein) and proteolysis to amino acids that meet the requirements of dairy cow production (Schwab and Broderick, 2017). About 25% of nitrogen intake is converted into milk by dairy cows (Calsamiglia et al., 2010). The increase flow of un-degrdable feed protein to the intestine could then potentially improve nitrogen use efficiency and milk yield.

In terms of milk yield, the results observed that dairy cows fed diets including soybean meal treated with PP enhancement milk yield and FCM4% without any negative significant effect, which might be due to the effect of tannin inclusion in diets providing cows with the requirements of amino acids. These results are in agreement with previous studies, Benchaar et al. (2008) and Aguerre et al. (2010) reported that reducing tannin concentrations to less than 2% DM when incorporated into dairy cow diets had no effect on milk output and composition. On the other hand, milk yield (kg/d), was consistently lowered due to increasing levels of tannin more than 3% by Yanza et al. (2020). Adding pomegranate peel to dairy cow diets led to an in-significant decrease in fat milk concentration. These results are consistent with Panel et al. (2011) observed no effects of tannins when supplemented with up to 0.8% of DM on milk fat and milk lactose composition. In contrast, Wanapat et al. (2000) reported improved milk production, milk fat content, and 4% fat corrected milk yield in cows fed ration supplemented with tannin up to 1% DM. milk protein was increasing by adding PP to the dairy cow while, had a negative effect on milk urea nitrogen which, has potentially positive for the environment. The positive effect of protein milk may be attributed to a metabolic supply sufficient amount of energy and dietary un-degradable protein will increase milk protein concentrations according to Kaufman and Pierre (2001). Our results agree with previous studies done by Aguerre et al. (2010) found that milk protein concentration increased when tannins were supplemented at level of 0.45% of DM, whereas Panel et al. (2011) reported that supplementing tannins at a level of 1.8% of DM decreased milk protein concentration. There is a high positive correlation between milk urea nitrogen, and the concentration of ammonia in the rumen. As discussed previously, forming tannins-protein complexes decreased protein degradation and NH3-N production in the rumen. That may have reflected in decreased MUN concentration according to Herremans et al. (2019) and Dschaak et al. (2011).

Conclusions and Recommendations

This study investigated the inclusion of pomegranate peel in dairy cows’ diets. The potential effect could be beneficial for decreasing rumen degradation of SBM and contributing to overcoming methane emissions from ruminants. Also, it promoted an decrease in milk urea content without having an effect on quality and quantity of milk production. Future work will be necessary to investigate further the role of pomegranate peel in its effect on animal performances.

Novelty Statement

A number of goals were achieved, namely, the utilization of natural tannins found in pomegranate peel, and the peel considered an agricultural residue that may cause pollution to the environment. Natural tannins in dairy cow diets helped to reduce rumen degradation of SBM protein, and reduce ruminant methane emissions.

Author’s Contribution

Soliman Mohammed Soliman: Experimental design, performed experiment and wrote the manuscript.

Mohsen Mahmoud Shoukry: Revision to experimental design, scientific content, and grammar.

Ahmed Mohammed El-Okazy: Provided access research component (field-equipment and apparatus for analysis).

Ahmed Mahmoud El-Morsy: Animal processing on the farm - collected samples of the first trail.

Mahmoud Mohammed Soliman: Data collection and data analysis- collected samples of the second trail.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

AOAC (2005). Official method of Analysis. 18th Edition, Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, method 973.49. http://www.eoma.aoac.org/

Aguerre MJ, Wattiaux MA, Capozzolo MC, Lencioni P, Cabral C (2010). Effect of quebracho-chestnut tannin extracts at two dietary crude protein levels on performance and rumen fermentation of dairy cows J. Dairy Sci., 93(Suppl. 1): 445.

Alipour D, Rouzbehan Y (2010). Effects of several levels of extracted tannin from grape pomace on intestinal digestibility of soybean meal. Livest. Sci., 128: 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.003

Anderson, Yang G (1992). Determination of bicarbonate and total volatile acid concentration in anaerobic digesters using a simple titration. Water Environ. Res., 64: 53-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable /25044114. https://doi.org/10.2175/WER.64.1.8

Andrej L, Alenka L (2021). In vitro dry matter and crude protein rumen degradation and abomasal digestibility of soybean meal treated with chestnut and quebracho wood extracts. Food Sci. Nutr., 9(2): 1034–1039. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2072

Arisya W, Ridwan R, Ridla M, and, Jayanegara A (2019). Tannin treatment for protecting feed protein degradation in the rumen in vitro. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1360: 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1360/1/012022

Barry T, McNabb WC (1999). The implications of condensed tannins on the nutritive value of temperate forages fed to ruminants. Br. J. Nutr., 81: 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114599000501

Basria AC, Yustanto PW, Kurniawati A, Hanim C, Anas M, Yusiati ML (2021). Dietary Swietenia mahagoni as tannin source to increase in-vitro nutrients digestibility. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 9(12): 2184-2193. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.12.2184.2193

Beauchemin KA., McGinn SM, Martinez TF, McAllister McAllister TA (2007). Use of condensed tannin extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 85: 1990-1996. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-686

Bechir F, Mariana P, Adrian T, Simona BM (2021). Comparative study of salivary pH, buffer capacity, and flow in patients with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Hlth., 19(1): 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010201

Benchaar C, McAllister TA, Chouinard PY (2008) Digestion, ruminal fermentation, ciliate protozoal populations, and milk production from dairy cows fed cinnamaldehyde, quebracho condensed tannin, or Yucca schidigera saponin extract. J. Dairy Sci., 91: 4765-4777. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1338

Bhatta R, Saravanan M, Baruah L, Prasad CS (2015). Effects of graded levels of tannin-containing tropical tree leaves on in vitro rumen fermentation, total protozoa and methane production. J. Appl. Microbiol., 118: 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12723

Bilal C, Grewal RS, Lamba JS, Jasmine K, Neeraj K (2020). Effect of varying levels of tannins treatment on in vitro degradability of soybean meal. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 9(7): 3991-4000. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.469

Brown WE, Bradford BJ (2020). Compared with soy and canola protein sources on nutrient digestibility and production responses in mid-lactation dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 103(7): 6233-6243. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17939

Bueno CSI, Roberta A, Brandi, Gisele M, Fagundes, Gabriela B, James PM (2020). The role of condensed tannins in the in vitro rumen fermentation kinetics in ruminant species: feeding type involved. Animals, 10: 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040635

Bueno ICS, Vitti DM, Louvandini H, Abdalla AL (2008). A new approach for in vitro bioassay to measure tannin biological effects based on a gas production technique. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 141: 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.011

Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Reynolds CK, Kristensen NB, van Vuuren AM (2010). Strategies for optimizing nitrogen use by ruminants. Animal, 4(7): 1184–1196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110000911

Castro SIB, Phillip LE, Lapierre H, Jardon PW, Berthiaume R (2008). The relative merit of ruminal undegradable protein from soybean meal or soluble fiber from beet pulp to improve nitrogen utilization in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 91(10): 3947-3957. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0638

Chen, KJ, Jan, DF, Chiou WS, Yang DW (2002). Effects of dietary heat extruded soybean meal and protected fat supplement on the production, blood and ruminal characteristics of Holstein cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 15(6): 821-827. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.821

Chen XB, Gomes MJ (1992). Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives. An overview of the technical details. Rowett. Res. Inst. Univ. Aberdeen UK. (Occasional publication). pp. 21.

Colmenero JJO, Broderick GA (2006). Effect of amount and ruminal degradability of soybean meal protein on performance of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 89(5): 1635-1643. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72230-5

Costa M, Alves SP, Cabo Â, Stilwell G, Dentinho MT, Bessa RJ (2018). Modulation of in vitro rumen biohydrogenation by Cistus ladanifer tannins compared with other tannin sources J. Sci. Food Agric., 97(2): 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7777

Dewi T, and Riska A (2019). Quercetin concentration and total flavonoid content of anti-atherosclerotic herbs using aluminum chloride colorimetric assay. AIP Conf. Proc., 2193: 030012. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139349

Dickhoefer U, Ahnert S, Susenbeth A (2016). Effects of quebracho tannin extract on rumen fermentation and yield and composition of microbial mass in heifers. J. Anim. Sci., 94(4): 1561–1575. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0061

Dschaak CM, Williams CM, Holt MS, Eun JS, Young AJ, Min BR (2011). Effects of supplementing condensed tannin extract on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 94: 2508–2519. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3818

Dubey M, Dutta N, Kusumakar S, Pattanai KA, Banerjee PS, Singh M (2011). Effect of condensed tannins supplementation from tanniferous tree leaves on in vitro nitrogen and substrate degradation. Anim. Nutr., Feed Technol., 11: 115–122.

Duncan DB (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

Egyptian AgricultureMinistry. Egypt Agricultural Production: Volume: Fruits: Pomegranate. (2017). The data is categorized under Global Database’s Egypt – Table EG. B007: Agricultural Production.

Fitriastuti R, Yusiati LM, Widyobroto BP, Bachruddin Z, Hanim C (2019). Effect of cashew nutshell oil supplementation as phenol source for protein protection on in vitro nutrient digestibility. Bul. Peternak., 43: 225–230. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v43i4.35591

Fujihara T, Ørskov ER, Reeds PJ (1987). The effect of protein infusion on urinary excretion of purine derivatives in ruminants nourished by intragastric nutrition. J. Agric. Sci., Cambridge, 109: 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600080916

Gaines WL, Davidson FA (1923). Relation between percentage fat content and yield of milk Ill. Agric. Expt. Sta. Bull., 245.

Gerlach K, Pries M, Sudekum K (2018). Effect of condensed tannin supplementation on in vivo nutrient digestibilities and energy values of concentrates in sheep. Small Ruminant Res., 161: 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.01.017

Gonzalo C, Baro JA, Carriedo JA, San Primitivo F (1993). Use of the Fossomatic method to determine somatic cell counts in sheep milk. J. Dairy Sci., 76: 115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030293773300

Gunun P, Gunun N, Cherdthong A, Wanapat M, Polyorach S, Sirilaophai-San S, Wachirapakorn C, Kang S (2018). In vitro rumen fermentation and methane production as affected by rambutan peel powder. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 46: 626–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1371608

Hagerman AVE, Butler LG (1981). Specificity of proanthocyanidin protein interactions. J. Biol. Chem., 256: 4494–4497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)69462-7

Hariadi BT, Santoso B (2010). Evaluation of tropical plants containing tannin on in vitro methanogenesis and fermentation parameters using rumen fluid. J. Sci. Food Agric., 90: 456–461. [PubMed]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3839

Hassanat F, Chaouki B (2012). Assessment of the effect of condensed (acacia and quebracho) and hydrolysable (chestnut and valonea) tannins on rumen fermentation and methane production in vitro. J. Sci. Food Agric., https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5763

Heendeniya RG, Christensen DA, Maenz DD, McKinnon JJ, Yu P (2012). Protein fractionation byproduct from canola meal for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 4488–4500. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5029

Herremans S, Decruyenaere V, Cantalapiedra-Hijar G, Beckers Y, Froidmont E (2019). Effects of hydrolysable tannin-treated grass silage on milk yield and composition, nitrogen partitioning and nitrogen isotopic discrimination in lactating dairy cows. Animal, pp. 1– 9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111900226X

Hvelplund T, Weisbjerg MR (2000). In situ techniques for the estimation of protein degradability and postrumen availability. In forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition, CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp. 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993447.0233

İnal F, Emel G, Behiç C, Mustafa SA (2015). A comparison of different analysis methods for milk urea nitrogen. Kafkas Üniv. Vet. Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(5): 767-772.

Ishler VA (2016). Interpretation of milk urea nitrogen (MUN) Values. https://extension.psu.edu/

Jayanegara A, Goel G, Makkar HPS, Becker K (2015). Divergence between purified hydrolysable and condensed tannin effects on methane emission, rumen fermentation and microbial population in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 209: 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.08.002

Johnson, R.G. Young AJ (2003). The association between milk urea nitrogen and DHI production variables in western commercial dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 3008–3015. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73899-5

Juan C, Rafael J, Sara S, María DM, Isabel CB, Jacobo A, Carlos Fernando A, and, Sánchez F (2020). Role of secondary plant metabolites on enteric methane mitigation in ruminants. Front Vet. Sci., 7: 584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00584

Katongole B, Yan T (2020). Effect of varying dietary crude protein level on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, milk production, and nitrogen use efficiency by lactating Holstein-Friesian cows. Animals, 10(12): 2439-2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122439

Kelln BM, Penner GB, Acharya SN, McAlliste TA, Lardner HA (2020). Impact of condensed tannin-containing legumes on ruminal fermentation, nutrition, and performance in ruminants: A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 2(101): 628–633. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2020-0096

Kleiber M, Ogieńżycia Z, Kizwie R (1961). Outline of the bioenergetics of animals PWRiL Warszawa. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.23.030161.000311

Kauffman AJ, St-Pierre NR (2001). The relationship of milk urea nitrogen to urine nitrogen excretion in Holstein and Jersey cows J. Dairy Sci., 84: 2284-2294. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74675-9

Ling ER (1963). Text book of dairy chemistry. Practical Champan and Hall, L.T.D. London, 4th ed. Vol. 11. p. 140.

Makkar HPS (2003). Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Rumin. Res., 49: 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00142-1

McDonald I (1981a). A revised model for estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. J. Agric. Sci., 96: 251-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600032081

McDonnell RP, Douglas ML, Auldist MJ, Jacobs JL, Wales WJ (2017). Rumen degradability characteristics of five starch-based concentrate supplements used on Australian dairy farms. Anim. Prod. Sci., 57: 1512–1519. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16466

McSweeney CS, Palmer B, McNeill DM, Krause DO (2001). Microbial interactions with tannins: Nutritional consequences for ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 91: 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00232-2

Menke KH, Steingass H (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev., 28: 7-55.

Naumann HD, Tedeschi LO, Zeller WE, Huntley NF (2017). The role of condensed tannins in ruminant animal production: advances, limitations and future directions. Rev. Brasil. Zoot., 46: 929–949. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-92902017001200009

Ng F, Kittelmann S, Patchett ML, Attwood GT, Janssen PH, Rakonjac J, and Gagic D (2016). An adhesin from hydrogen-utilizing rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M 1 binds a broad range of hydrogen-producing microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol., 18: 3010–3021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13155

NRC (1985). Nutrient requirements of sheep. 6th Edition, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. USA. https://doi.org/10.17226/2033

NRC (2001). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA. https://doi.org/10.17226/10017

Oh HI, Hoff JE (1987). pH dependence of complex formation between condensed tannins and proteins. J. Food Sci., 52: 1267– 1269, 1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14059.x

Orskov ER, McDonald I (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge, 92: 499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048

Panel QH, Xiuli L, Guoqi Z, Tianming H, Yuxi W (2018). Potential and challenges of tannins as an alternative to in-feed antibiotics for farm animal production. Anim. Nutr., 4(2): 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.09.004

Panel CM, Dschaak CM, Williams MS, Holt JS, Young AJ, Min BR (2011). Effects of supplementing condensed tannin extract on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 94: 2508-2519. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3818

Patra AK (2010). Meta-analyses of effects of phytochemicals on digestibility and rumen fermentation characteristics associated with methanogenesis. J. Sci. Food Agric., 90: 2700–2708. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4143

Prasetiyono BW, Subrata A, Tampoebolon BI, Surono, Widiyanto (2018). In Vitro ruminal degradability of soybean meal protein protected with natural tannin. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 119: 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/119/1/012016

Priolo A, Anele1G, Waghorn C, Lanza M, Biondi L, Pennisipulp P, (2000). effects on lamb growth performance and meat quality Polyethylene glycol as a means for reducing the impact of condensed tannins in carob. J. Anim. SCI., 78: 810-816. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.784810x

Ramos JT, Flavio PJ, Roberta FC, Guilherme A, Cristiane BT, Alice HP, Paulo HR (2020). Effect of tannins and monensin on feeding behaviour, feed intake, digestive parameters and microbial efficiency of nellore cows. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 19(1): 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1729667

Savari M, Khorvash M, Amanlou H, Ghorbani G (2017). Effects of rumen-degradable protein:rumen-undegradable protein ratio and corn processing on production performance, nitrogen efficiency, and feeding behavior of Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 101(2). https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12776

Schofield P, Pitt RE, Pell AN (1994). Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J. Anim. Sci., 72: 2980-2991. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72112980x

Schwab CG, Broderick AA (2017). 100-year review: protein and amino acid nutrition in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 100: 10094–10112. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13320

Shokoh P, Anousheh ZK, Hamid RB, Hadi N, Ahmad F, Safian S, Seeram R, Filippo B (2020). Antioxidant, antimicrobial and antiviral properties of herbal materials. Antioxidants, 9: 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9121309

Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM (1999). Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol., 299: 152-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1

Statistical Analysis System Institute (2002). SAS/ STAT user’s Guide: Statistics. North Caroline: SAS Institute.

Tan Y, Chin S, Abdullah N, Liang JB (2011). Effects of condensed tannins from Leucaena on methane production, rumen fermentation and populations of methanogens and protozoa in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 169: 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.07.004

Tangendjaja B (2020). Nutrient content of soybean meal from different origins based on near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Indones. J. Agric. Sci., 21(1): 39. https://doi.org/10.21082/ijas.v21n1.2020.p39-47

Tilley JMA, Terry RA (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld. Soc., 18: 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x

Van Soest PJ (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. USA. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501732355

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Verbic J, Chen XB, MacLeod NA, Ørskov ER (1990). Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants. Effect of microbial nucleic acid infusion on purine derivatives excretion by steers. J. Agric. Sci., 114: 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600072610

Wanapat M, Puramongkon T, Siphuak W (2000). Feeding of cassava hay for lactating dairy cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 478–482. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.478

Yanza YR, Fitri A, Suwignyo B, Hidayatik N, Kumalasari NR, Agung Irawan A, Jayanegara A (2021). The utilisation of tannin extract as a dietary additive in ruminant nutrition: A meta analysis. Animals, 11: 3317- 3342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113317