Status of Wheat Production and Associated Nematode Pests in Pakistan
Status of Wheat Production and Associated Nematode Pests in Pakistan
Erum Iqbal*, Firoza Kazi and Saboohi Raza
National Nematological Research Centre (NNRC), University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan.
Abstract | Plant-parasitic nematodes are potential pests of agricultural crops including wheat and cause quantitative and qualitative loss to crop production worldwide. They cause serious damage to many important agricultural crops and add to the problem of food security worldwide. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the most important economic cereal crop in the world and Pakistan stands in eighth position in global wheat production. The wheat crop is susceptible to several diseases and nematode pests. The most important nematode parasites are cereal cyst nematodes, root-knot nematodes, lesion nematodes, seed-gall nematodes and stem nematodes. In this review article status of global wheat production is presented and its associated parasitic nematodes have been discussed with reference to chronological research data related to Pakistan.
Received | April 11, 2022; Accepted | May 13, 2022; Published | June 10, 2022
*Correspondence | Erum Iqbal, National Nematological Research Centre (NNRC), University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Iqbal, E., Kazi, F., and Raza, S., 2022. Status of wheat production and associated nematode pests in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Nematology, 40(1): 49-61.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjn/2022/40.1.49.61
Keywords | Wheat, Production, Nematodes, Parasitic, Pakistan
Copyright: 2022 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Wheat is the third-largest cereal staple food of the world in terms in global production after maize and rice. Globally its production was over 765 million metric tons in 2019/2020 with an increase of over 30 million tons as compared to the previous marketing year. It is the main food grain source for the majority of the people of the world and an important component of the human diet, particularly in developing countries (https://www.statista.com). It is grown on 20% of the global cultivated land area and is the main food resource for 40% of the world’s population (Braun et al., 2010).
Worldwide, wheat provides nearly 55% of the carbohydrates and 20% of the food calories consumed globally (Pathak and Shrivastav, 2015; Ajmal-uddin et al., 2020). Wheat also contributes a number of components which that are beneficial for human health viz., essential amino acids, minerals, and vitamins, beneficial phytochemicals, and dietary fibre (Shewry and Hey, 2015). In Pakistan, wheat is the most important food crop and plays a vital role in the country’s food security and economy.
Wheat belongs to the family Triticeae (Hordeae) in the grass family Poaceae (Gramineae). About 95% of the wheat produced is common wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emThell.), also known as bread wheat. Wheat is the first important and strategic cereal crop for the majority of the world’s population.
Global wheat production
Data on global wheat production during ten years showed that there was a sharp decrease in the production of wheat in the year 2012/13 as compared to the preceding production year. However, there was a gradual increase in production in the next five years, (2013/14-2017/18). Again in the year 2018/19 sharp decrease in production was observed but it increased many folds subsequently in the year 2019/20 (Figure 1) (www.statista.com).
Leading ten wheat producers worldwide in 2019/2020 (In 1,000 Metric Tons)
Among the 10 global leading wheat-producing countries in 2019/2020 (Figure 2), China is the topmost country by wheat production in the world with 136.0 million metric tons, followed by the European Union which produced about 135.8 million metric tons of wheat. The other top countries in descending order are India, the Russian Federation, the United States of America, Canada, Australia, Pakistan, Ukraine, and Turkey. Pakistan ranked at 8th position in 2020 with 25,700 wheat production in the world (https://www.statista.com/).
Status of wheat production in Pakistan
Agricultural cropping has two seasons in Pakistan: Kharif, the first sowing season starts from April to June and is harvested from October to December. Rice, sugarcane, cotton, maize, moong, mash, bajra and jowar are “Kharif” crops. Rabi, the second sowing season, begins from October to December, and is harvested from April to May. Wheat, gram, lentil (masoor), tobacco, rapeseed, barley, and mustard are “Rabi” crops.
The important crops (wheat, rice, sugarcane, maize and cotton) account for 21.73 % of the value addition of the agriculture sector and 4.20 % of GDP. The other crops account for 11.53 percent of the value addition of the agriculture sector and 2.23 % of GDP. The production of the wheat crop is given in Table 1 (Source: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics; Pakistan Economic Survey, 2019-20).
Table 1: Production of wheat crop during 2013-14 to 2019-20.
Year |
Production (000 Tonnes) |
2013-14 |
25,979 (7.3) |
2014-15 |
25,086 (-3.4) |
2015-16 |
25,633 (2.2) |
2016-17 |
26,674 (4.1) |
2017-18 |
25,076 (-6.0) |
2018-19 |
24,349 (-2.9) |
2019-20 (P) |
24,946 (2.5) |
P: Provisional (July-March), Figures in parentheses are growth/decline rates |
Source: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics.
Wheat production, area, and yield in Pakistan
Wheat accounts for 8.7 percent of value addition in agriculture and 1.7 % of gross domestic product (GDP). Wheat crop production increased by 2.5% to 24.946 million tonnes over last year’s (2018-19) production of 24.349 million tonnes. The area under cultivation increased by 1.7 % to 8,825 thousand hectares over last year’s (2018-19) area (8,678 thousand hectares). The production increased due to increase in cultivated area, healthy grain formation and better crop yield. The position over the last five years is given in Table 2 and Figure 3 (Pakistan Economic Survey, 2019-20; www.finance.gov.pk).
Table 2: Wheat production, area, and yield.
Year |
Area |
Production |
Yield |
|||
(000 Hec.) |
% Change |
(000 Tonnes) |
% Change |
kgs/ hec. |
% Change |
|
2015-16 |
9,224 |
- |
25,633 |
- |
2,779 |
- |
2016-17 |
8,972 |
-2.7 |
26,674 |
4.12 |
2,973 |
7.0 |
2017-18 |
8,797 |
-1.9 |
25,076 |
-6.0 |
2,851 |
-4.1 |
2018-19 |
8,678 |
-1.4 |
24,349 |
-2.9 |
2,806 |
-1.6 |
2019-20 (P) |
8,825 |
1.7 |
24,946 |
2.5 |
2,827 |
0.7 |
P: Provisional (July-March) |
Source: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics.
Province wise production % of wheat
Wheat is grown in all four provinces of Pakistan on a small to large scale. Province wise wheat production is as follows: Punjab produced 76%, Sindh 16%, KP 5% and only 3% wheat was in Balochistan Province (Figure 4) (Sehgal and Robotka, 2020).
Wheat production, yield, and area by province from 2010-11 to 2017-18
Punjab takes first place in wheat production. The maximum wheat production was 20466.30 million tonnes in Punjab and the minimum production was 729.10 million tonnes in Balochistan. Moreover, the Punjab and Balochistan provinces are identified as the highest and lowest wheat producers on average during 2010 to 2018.
Punjab province is the highest producer of wheat. Maximum production (20466.30 million tonnes) was achieved in the year 2016-17 during the period of eight years i.e., 2010-2018 from Punjab; from Sindh 4287.90 was the maximum production in the year 2010-11; KP showed 4287.90 mt productions during the 2015-16 financial years while Balochistan province produced 935.40 mt in 2017-18. However, the overall highest production (26673.60 mt) during 2010-2018 was attained in the 2016-17financial year (Table 3). The same trend was observed in the province-wise average yield of wheat during the eight financial years (2010-2018) as seen in the province-wise production (Table 4). Provincial cultivated area of wheat during the eight financial years (2010-2018) was as follows: The largest area was in Punjab in the year 2014-15, in Sindh during the year 2016-17, in KP in the year 2017-2018 and in Balochistan during the year 2013-14. Overall the largest cultivated area of wheat in Pakistan was during the 2015-2016 financial years (Table 5).
Table 3: Wheat production by province from 2010-11 to 2017-18.
Year |
Punjab |
Sindh |
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa |
Balochistan |
Pakistan |
2010-11 |
19041.00 |
4287.90 |
1155.80 |
729.10 |
25213.80 |
2011-12 |
17738.90 |
3761.50 |
1130.30 |
842.70 |
23473.40 |
2012-13 |
18587.00 |
3598.70 |
1257.60 |
768.10 |
24211.40 |
2013-14 |
19738.90 |
4002.10 |
1363.10 |
875.30 |
25979.40 |
2014-15 |
19281.90 |
3672.20 |
1259.90 |
872.10 |
25086.10 |
2015-16 |
19526.70 |
3834.60 |
4287.90 |
871.30 |
25633.10 |
2016-17 |
20466.30 |
3910.40 |
1365.10 |
931.80 |
26673.60 |
2017-18 |
19178.50 |
3639.50 |
1322.70 |
935.40 |
25076.10 |
Source: Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan (http://www.amis.pk).
Table 4: Wheat average yields by province from 2010-11 to 2017-18 (Average yield 40 kg per Acre).
Year |
Punjab |
Sindh |
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa |
Balochistan |
Pakistan |
2010-11 |
28.79 |
37.91 |
16.14 |
21.64 |
28.66 |
2011-12 |
27.68 |
36.27 |
15.68 |
21.95 |
27.45 |
2012-13 |
28.88 |
34.40 |
17.49 |
21.40 |
28.28 |
2013-14 |
28.94 |
36.10 |
17.75 |
22.17 |
28.57 |
2014-15 |
27.94 |
33.56 |
17.40 |
22.92 |
27.57 |
2015-16 |
28.57 |
33.60 |
18.35 |
23.02 |
28.12 |
2016-17 |
31.09 |
33.83 |
18.45 |
23.92 |
30.08 |
2017-18 |
29.58 |
33.79 |
17.76 |
23.99 |
28.84 |
Source: Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan (http://www.amis.pk).
Table 5: Wheat area in the province from 2010-11 to 2017-18 (‘000’ Acres in Area).
Year |
Punjab |
Sindh |
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa |
Balochistan |
Pakistan |
2010-11 |
16534.13 |
2827.93 |
1790.31 |
842.15 |
21994.52 |
2011-12 |
16019.89 |
2592.68 |
1802.17 |
959.78 |
21374.52 |
2012-13 |
16090.07 |
2615.41 |
1797.23 |
897.50 |
21400.22 |
2013-14 |
17054.05 |
2771.59 |
1919.80 |
987.20 |
22732.64 |
2014-15 |
17250.75 |
2735.26 |
1810.33 |
951.37 |
22747.71 |
2015-16 |
17084.94 |
2853.13 |
1908.43 |
946.18 |
22792.69 |
2016-17 |
16458.02 |
2889.95 |
1850.11 |
973.86 |
22171.94 |
2017-18 |
16209.92 |
2692.51 |
1861.73 |
974.60 |
21738.76 |
Source: Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan (http://www.amis.pk).
Important nematode pests of wheat
Pests and parasites cause huge economic losses to agricultural crops and threaten global food security. Plant-parasitic nematodes are known to infest almost all cultivated crops, and caused estimated economic losses of over $130 billion worldwide (Chitwood, 2003). The largest damage to crops can be attributed to sedentary endoparasitic nematodes viz., root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) and cyst nematodes (Globodera and Heterodera spp.) (Blyuss et al., 2019).
In the case of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) the major nematode parasites on a global basis are cereal cyst nematode, primarily Heterodera avenae (Peng et al., 2009; Dababat et al., 2015), besides other economically important nematodes including root-lesion nematodes, Pratylenchus spp., root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp., the ear-cockle nematode or seed gall nematode, Anguina tritici (Steinbuch, 1799; Filipjev, 1936) and the stem nematode, Ditylenchus dipsaci (Kuhn, 1857; Filipjev, 1936; McDonal and Nicol, 2005).
In Pakistan, one of the earlier records of plant-parasitic nematodes disease on wheat was made by Sattar and Hafeez (1952) who reported Anguina tritici from D.G. Khan, Muzaffargarh and Jhung areas of Punjab, Pakistan. Maqbool (1986, 1988b, 1992) gave a comprehensive list of plant-parasitic nematodes with their host association and distribution including wheat crop. Biodiversity of nematode fauna in Pakistan with systematic distribution of nematodes on different crops was given by Maqbool and Shahina (2001) in which more than 74 plant-parasitic nematodes associated with wheat were reported. Later on Shahina and Erum (2007), Erum and Shahina (2010) and Handoo et al. (2010) during the nematological survey of wheat crops reported some new species and new record species from wheat in Pakistan. Zarina and Shahina (2012) provided comprehensive bibliographical records on plant Nematology in Pakistan.
Among the nematode fauna of wheat eight new species have so far been described from Pakistan viz., Scutylenchus quettensis (Maqbool et al., 1984); Heterodera pakistanensis (Maqbool and Shahina, 1986), Tylenchus bhitai (Maqbool and Shahina, 1987), Tylenchorhynchus tritici (Golden et al., 1987); Helicotylenchus discocephalus (Firoza and Maqbool, 1993), Atetylenchus metaporus (Erum and Shahina, 2008), Paurodontella myceliophaga (Handoo et al., 2010) and P. balochistanica (Handoo et al., 2010).
Besides the new nematode species of wheat other plant-parasitic nematodes were recorded with this crop by several scientists from time to time in Pakistan (Akhtar, 1962; Anwer et al., 1991; Erum, 2011; Gul and Saeed, 1990; Khan et al., 2003; Khan, 2011; Solangi et al., 1982; Maqbool and Shahina, 2001; Zarina and Shahina, 2012; Erum et al., 2021). A comprehensive list of new and known plant-parasitic nematodes associated with wheat in Pakistan is incorporated herein (Table 6).
Major nematode pests of wheat
Cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera spp.: The cereal cyst nematodes (CCNs) are a group of several closely related species which have been documented to cause economic yield loss in rain-fedwheat production systems in several parts of the world where cereals are produced. These nematodes are obligate sedentary endo-parasites and are among the important pests that limit the production of small grain cereals (Subbotin et al., 2010a; Smiley et al., 2017).
CCNs nematodes alone are estimated to reduce the production of crops by 10% globally (Ali et al., 2019). Economic losses in cereals caused by CCNs were documented and reported in several studies around the world (Dababat and Fourie, 2018; İmren et al., 2019). Among the 80 valid species of the genus Heterodera Schmidt, 1871 (Subbotin et al., 2010b; Haque and Khan, 2021), the most common and economically important nematode species found associated with wheat is Heterodera avenae Wollenweber, 1924. This species has a worldwide distribution including Pakistan. Heterodera avenae has been associated with molya diseases of wheat and barley in India (Sharma, 2003), and is known to occur in the major wheat-growing areas (Kanwar and Bajaj, 2010), but this disease has not been reported from Pakistan so far.
Table 6: Plant-parasitic nematodes encountered from wheat in Pakistan.
Tylenchus Bastian, 1865 |
*T. Bhitai Maqbool and Shahina, 1987 |
T. butteus Thorne and Malek, 1968 |
T. skarduensis Maqbool and Shahina, 1987 |
Filenchus Andrássy, 1954 |
F. cylindricus (Thorne and Malek, 1968) Niblack and Bernard, 1985 |
F. filiformis (Butschli, 1873) Meyl, 1961 |
F. vulgaris (Brzeski, 1963) Lownsbery and Lownsbery, 1985 |
Aglenchus Andrássy, 1954 |
A. siddiqii Khan, Khan and Bilqees, 1992 |
Coslenchus Siddiqi, 1978 |
C. tuberosus (Maqbool, 1983) Mizukubo and Minagawa, 1985 |
Boleodorus Thorne, 1941 |
B. neosimilis Geraert, 1971 |
B. pakistanensis Siddiqi, 1963 |
B. rafiqi Husain and Khan, 1965 |
Basiria Siddiqi, 1959 |
B. graminophila Siddiqi, 1959 |
B. incita Szczygiel, 1970 |
Neopsilenchus Thorne and Malek, 1968 |
N. (N.) minor (Geraert, 1968) Shahina and Maqbool, 1990 |
Malenchus Andrássy, 1968 |
M. andrassyi Merny, 1970 |
M. fusiformis (Thorne and Malek, 1968) Siddqi, 1979 |
M. labiatus Maqbool and Shahina, 1985 |
Ottolenchus Husain and Khan, 1967 |
O. facultativus (Szczygiel, 1970) Brzeski, 1982 |
O. longicauda Maqbool and Shahina, 1985 |
Anguina Scopoli, 1777 |
A. tritici (Steinbuch, 1799) Filipjev, 1936 |
Ditylenchus Filipjev, 1936 |
D. dipsaci (Kühn, 1857) Filipjev, 1936 |
D. emus Khan, Chawla and Prasad, 1969 |
D. medicaginis Wasilewska, 1965 |
D. myceliophagus Goodey, 1958 |
Hoplolaimus Von Daday, 1905 |
H. californicus Sher, 1963 |
H. Columbus Sher, 1963 |
H. dimorphicus Mulk and Jairajpuri, 1976 |
H. galeatus (Cobb, 1913) Thorne, 1935 |
H. indicus Sher, 1963 |
H. seinhorsti Luc, 1958 |
H. seshadrii Mulk and Jairajpuri, 19762 |
Rotylenchus Filipjev, 1936 |
R. robustus (de Man, 1876) Filipjev, 1936 |
Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945 |
H. digonicus Perry in Perry, Darling and Thorne, 1959 |
H. dihystera (Cobb, 1893) Sher, 1961 |
*H. discocephalus Firoza and Maqbool, 1993 |
H. egyptiensis Tarjan, 1964 |
H. indicus Siddiqi, 1963 |
H. macronatus Malik and Jairajpuri, 1975 |
H. microdorus Prasad, Khan and Chawla, 1965 |
H. multicinctus (Cobb, 1893) Golden, 1956 |
H. platyurus Perry in Perry, Darling and Thorne, 1959 |
Rotylenchulus Linford and Oliveira, 1940 |
R. reniformis Linford and Oliveira, 1940 |
Heterodera Schmidt, 1871 |
H. avenae Wollenweber, 1924 |
H. mani Mathews, 1971 |
H. mothi Khan and Husain, 1965 |
*H. pakistanensis Maqbool and Shahina, 1986 |
H. schachtii Schmidt, 1871 |
H. zeae Koshy, Swarup and Sethi, 1971 |
Meloidogyne Goeldi, 1892 |
M. incognita (Kofoid and White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949 |
M. javanica (Treub, 1885) Chitwood, 1949 |
Tylenchorhynchus Cobb, 1913 |
T. annulatus (Cassidy, 1930) Golden, 1971 |
T. brassicae Siddiqi, 1961 |
T. clarus Allen, 1955 |
T. cylindricus Cobb, 1913 |
T. elegans Siddiqi, 1961 |
T. mashhoodi Siddiqi and Basir, 1959 |
T. nudus Allen, 1955 |
T. straitus Allen, 1955 |
*T. tritici Golden, Maqbool and Handoo, 1987 |
T. tuberosus Zarina and Maqbool, 1994 |
Bitylenchus (Filipjev, 1934) Siddiqi, 1986 |
B. maximus (Allen, 1955) Siddiqi, 1986 |
B. vulgaris (Upadhyay, Swarup and Sethi, 1972) Siddiqi, 1986 |
Dolichorhynchus Mulk and Jairajpuri, 1974 |
D. phaseoli (Sethi and Swarup, 1968) Mulk and Jairajpuri, 1974 |
Paratrophurus Arias, 1970 |
P. anomalus Kleynhans and Heyns, 1983 |
Quinisulcius Siddiqi, 1971 |
Table continue on next page............... |
Q. acutoides (Thorne and Malek, 1968) Siddiqi, 1971 |
Q. curvus (Williams, 1960) Siddiqi, 1970 |
Merlinius Siddiqi, 1970 |
M. brevidens (Allen, 1955) Siddiqi, 1970 |
M. microdorus (Geraert, 1966) Siddiqi, 1970 |
M. nanus (Allen, 1955) Siddiqi, 1970 |
Scutylenchus Jairajpuri, 1971 |
S. koreanus (Choi and Geraert, 1971) Siddiqi, 1979 |
*S. Quettensis Maqbool, Ghazala and Fatima, 1984 |
Psilenchus de Man, 1921 |
P. hilarulus de Man, 1921 |
P. hilarus Siddiqi, 1963 |
P. iranicus Kheiri, 1970 |
P. pratensis Doucet, 1996 |
Atetylenchus Khan, 1973 |
*A. metaporus Erum and Shahaina, 2008 |
Pratylenchus Filipjev, 1936 |
P. brachyurus (Godfrey, 1929) Filipjev and SchuurmansStekhoven, 1941 |
P. coffeae (Zimmermann, 1898) Filipjev and SchuurmansStekhoven, 1941 |
P. delatterei Luc, 1958 |
P. hexincisus Taylor and Jenkins, 1957 |
P. penetrans (Cobb, 1917) Filipjev and SchuurmansStekhoven, 1941 |
P. pratensis (de Man, 1880) Filipjev, 1936 |
P. similis Khan and Singh, 1975 |
P. thornei Sher and Allen, 1953 |
P. zeae Graham, 1951 |
Hirschmanniella Luc andGoodey, 1964 |
H. gracilis (de Man, 1880) Luc and Goodey, 1964 |
H. magna Siddiqi, 1966 |
H. mexicana (Chitwood, 1951) Sher, 1968 |
H. mucronata (Das, 1960) Luc and Goodey, 1964 |
H. oryzae (Van Breda de Haan, 1902) Luc and Goodey, 1964 |
Radopholus Thorne, 1949 |
R. similis (Cobb, 1893) Thorne, 1949 |
Criconemoides Taylor, 1936 |
C. curvatus Raski, 1952 |
C. sphaerocephalus Taylor, 1936 |
Hemicriconemoides Chitwood and Birchfield, 1957 |
H. cocophillus (Loos, 1949) Chitwood and Birchfield, 1957 |
H. communis Edward and Misra, 1964 |
H. mangiferae Siddiqi, 1961 |
Aulosphora Siddiqi, 1980 |
A. karachiensis Maqbool, Shahina and Zarina, 1986 |
Paratylenchus Micoletzky, 1922 |
P. projectus Jenkins, 1956 |
Gracilacus Raski, 1962 |
G. musae Shahina and Maqbool, 1993 |
Paurodontella Husain and Khan, 1968 |
*P. balochistanica Handoo, Erum, Nasira and Shahina, 2010 |
*P. myceliophaga Handoo, Erum, Nasira and Shahina, 2010 |
Aphelenchus Bastian, 1865 |
A. avenae Bastian, 1865 |
Aphelenchoides Fischer, 1894 |
A. rutgersi Hooper and Myers, 1971 |
A. asterocaudatus Das, 1960 |
Paraphalenchus Micoletzky, 1922 |
Paraphalenchus spp. |
Xiphinema Cobb, 1913 |
X. americanum Cobb, 1913 |
X. californicum Lamberti and Bleve-Zacheo, 1979 |
X. intermedium Lamberti and Bleve-Zacheo, 1979 |
Longidorus (Micoletzky, 1922) Filipjev, 1934 |
L. elongatus (de Man, 1876) Thorne and Swanger, 1936 |
Paratrichodorus Siddiqi, 1974 |
P. minor (Colbran, 1965) Siddiqi, 1974 |
* New species from wheat.
H. zeae Koshy et al. (1971), corn cyst nematodes are another Heterodera species considered as one of the most economically important nematodes causing severe losses to maize and other cereals reported from Pakistan, India and other parts of the world (Subbotin et al., 2010b).
Maqbool (1980) reported some cyst nematodes for the first time from wheat and other agricultural crops of Pakistan viz., H. avenae, H. zeae, H. mani, H. vigni, H. mothi, H. sacchari and H. schachtii. H. avenae, the major pest of wheat was recorded on wheat and maize from Peshawar and Mardan, respectively from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province (Maqbool, 1980).
H. zeae is the other most economically important species of cyst nematode; this species is the specific pest of maize, but has also been found well distributed in the wheat-growing areas of the country and might possible of the poor wheat growth and production. Other cyst nematode species have been found on wheat viz., H. mani, H. vigni and H. mothi but they have not been shown to be economically important (Maqbool, 1980, 1981). A new cyst nematode species H. pakistanensis was described by Maqbool and Shahina (1986) from wheat fields of Sukkur, Sindh Province of Pakistan.
H. avenae and H. zeae are major pests of wheat and barley in Pakistan. Approximately, 15-20% loss of wheat yield was caused by H. avenae in Pakistan (Maqbool, 1988a). Shahina and Maqbool (1990) reported H. zeae as a widely distributed species of wheat than other cereal cyst nematodes with a higher incidence in Khyber Pahktunkhwa than in Sind and Punjab provinces.
Shahina and Erum (2007) described the status of cyst nematodes of Pakistan and also reported that H. zeae along with H. mothi were detected more from wheat fields of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa than Punjab province while H. avenae was recorded only from Mirpurkhas, Sindh. H. avenae was later on reported from wheat fields of Bahawalpur, Punjab (Erum, 2011).
In another study, H. avenae and H. mani were reported from district Hunza and district Nager of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan from wheat (Sagir, 2019). Several scientists reported this nematode from time to time (Maqbool and Shahina, 2001; Zarina and Shahina, 2012; Erum et al., 2021).
Comparative study of cyst nematodes found from wheat fields of Pakistan
An attempt has been made to include the comparative morphological data of cyst nematode species found in wheat fields of Pakistan along with the key of identification (Erum, 2011). The complementary data will facilitate the correct identification of these cyst nematodes by morphology (Figure 5 and Table 7).
Key to the species of cyst nematode found from wheat fields of Pakistan
- Vulval slit very short (6-12µm). Vulval cone bifenestrate. Vulva denticles present or absent, bullae few to many---Avenae group---2
- Vulval slit very long more than 30µm. Vulval cone ambifenestrate, sometime bifenestrate---3
- Cyst dark brown to black. Vulval slit mean length 9.6µm, second stage larvae stylet knobs shallowly concave anteriorly --- H. avenae
- Bullae strong well developed. Vulval cone ambifenestrate---Schachtii group----4
- Bullae absent or few, scattered.Vulval cone ambifenestrate or bifenestrate --- Goettingiana group---5
- Bullae located at two levels, level one below under bridge four fingesr like bullae, level two randomly located long, heavy bullae---H. zeae
- Bullae located at one level, typically molar shaped---H. schachtii
- Second stage juveniles with three lines in lateral field---6
- Second stage juveniles with four lines in lateral field---7
- Distinct perineal pattern present, cyst elongate, L/W ratio 1.7---H. mothi
- Anus with distinct circular pattern. Second stage larvae stylet length 16-19µm, tail length 68-72 µm ---- H. pakistanensis
Seed gall nematode, Anguina tritici (Steinbuch, 1799) Filipjev, 1936
Seed-gall nematode (Anguina tritici), also known as ear-cockle, is commonly found on small grain cereals. It is the first known plant-parasitic nematode recorded in scientific literature in 1943 from wheat, and is reported from all wheat growing areas of the world. It has also been recorded from barley from many countries. A single gall may contain over 10,000 dormant juveniles (McDonal and Nicol, 2005). The nematode is one of the most serious pests of wheat in India; also causes yellow ear rot or tundu disease in wheat in association with the bacterium Clavibacter tritici (Khan, 2015). In Pakistan ear-cockle is a known pest on wheat and barley and is found in nearly all parts of the country, causing losses of 2-3%. However, in association with the yellow ear rot bacterium, it produces serious yield losses on wheat (Maqbool, 1988a).
Anguina tritici was first recorded from wheat plants from Muzaffarabad, DIG Khan and Jhung, Punjab in Pakistan by Sattar and Hafiz (1952). Shahina et al., (1989) reported that two out of nine wheat varieties showed high resistance against Anguina tritici, one variety was least susceptible while six varieties were moderately susceptible to susceptible. Later on, many researchers reported this nematode from time to time (Maqbool and Shahina, 2001; Zarina and Shahina, 2012; Erum et al., 2021).
Root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp.
Root-knot nematodes (RKN) are one of the most important plant parasitic groups that attack almost every crop including cereals worldwide. Mostly they attack cereals and favor light soils and warm temperatures, some species prefer to attack in cool climates while in tropical and subtropical areas three species of RKN viz., M. incognita, M. javanica and M. arenaria are known to attack cereals. Only cereal root-knot nematode M. nassi and M. artiellia have
Table 7: Comparative taxonomic data of cyst nematodes (Heterodera spp.) encountered from wheat fields of Pakistan (Measurements are in µm).
Characters |
H. avenae |
H. mothi |
H. pakistanensis |
H. schachtii |
H. zeae |
Female |
|||||
Length |
501-752 |
417-506 |
361-554 |
591-774 |
434.5-450 |
Width |
352-524 |
175-321 |
191-336.5 |
342.2-501 |
251-272 |
Stylet |
25-30 |
17-19.6 |
20-22 |
25.2-27.0 |
22-25 |
Cyst |
|||||
Length |
518.2-801.1 |
440.6-607.5 |
484-610 |
608-854 |
550-653 |
Width |
467-693 |
212-350 |
281-442 |
398-585 |
350-410.5 |
Length/width |
1.2-1.4 |
1.5-2.2 |
1.4-2.3 |
1.3-1.5 |
1.4-1.55 |
Fenestral length |
41-45 |
35.3-52 |
25-39 |
30-38 |
40.2-55.5 |
Fenestral width |
20-25 |
24-30 |
15-22 |
26-31.5 |
20.2-41 |
Vulval slit |
8.2-14.5 |
32-41 |
45-51 |
- |
30.5-48 |
Male |
|||||
Length |
1020-1470 |
935-1052.4 |
947-1281 |
805-1243 |
640.8-997 |
a |
32-56.5 |
38.6-46 |
28-37 |
27-35 |
18.9-39.9 |
b |
7-10.2 |
4-5 |
3.20-4.0 |
3.5-4.9 |
3.6-6.6 |
b’ |
4-5.9 |
- |
7.5-9.2 |
8.6-9.9 |
4.3-5.6 |
T |
38-60 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Stylet |
28.5-33 |
19-22 |
21.4-25 |
25-32 |
24-28 |
Spicules |
32.5-38 |
24-28 |
30-36 |
32-36.4 |
24.8-32 |
Gubernaculum |
10.2-13 |
7-10 |
8-10.4 |
9-11 |
8-11.5 |
Second stage larvae |
|||||
Length |
508-587 |
372-432 |
412-450 |
425-502.8 |
365.5-441 |
a |
15.5-20 |
20.5-30.5 |
24-27.9 |
19.5-23 |
20-25.57 |
b |
3.0-4.4 |
2.0-3.5 |
6-8.8 |
2.3-3.5 |
2.51-3.10 |
c |
7.5-10.4 |
6-8.5 |
6.3-9.8 |
9.5-10.6 |
8.30-10.40 |
c’ |
3-4.5 |
6-7.5 |
6.2-6.9 |
4.2-5.5 |
4.5-5.7 |
Stylet |
24-27.5 |
16-17.5 |
16-19 |
24.0-26.5 |
19.2-21 |
Tail length |
52.2-68.5 |
54-72.4 |
68-72 |
42-50.5 |
37.6-48 |
Hyline tail portion |
34-42 |
25.5-32.2 |
32-35.5 |
25-29 |
16.6-20 |
D.G.O. |
4-5.5 |
4-6.4 |
5.6-6.8 |
3-4 |
4-5 |
Lateral lines |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
Cyst body shape |
|||||
Female body shape |
Lemon shaped |
Lemon shaped |
Lemon shaped |
Lemon shaped |
Lemon shaped |
Cyst wall pattern |
|||||
Wall pattern |
Zig-zag lines |
Zig-zag |
Zig-zag, Subcuticularpunctation |
Zig-zag |
Zig-zag |
Cyst cone |
|||||
Fenestrae |
Bifenestrate |
Ambifenestrate |
Ambifenestrate |
Ambifenestrate |
Ambifenestrate |
Under bridge |
Absent |
Well developed |
Weak, conspicuous |
Strongly developed |
Well developed |
Bullae |
Prominen, heavy |
Strongly developed, mostly rounded |
Absent |
Molar shaped, irregularly arranged |
2 types:1-4 long fingerlike at the level of under bridge. 2- Small scattered below the level of under-bridge |
been shown to cause significant damage to wheat and barley in the subtropics (McDonal and Nicol, 2005). Two species of root-knot nematodes viz., M. incognita and M. javanica have been reported from wheat in Pakistan (Erum, 2011); other researchers reported prevalence of RKN species in low to moderately high percentages in wheat (Maqbool and Shahina, 2001; Zarina and Shahina, 2012; Erum et al., 2021).
Stem nematode, Ditylenchus dipsaci (Kuhn, 1857) Filipjev, 1936
Ditylenchus dipsaci is one of the most important species of stem nematodes on cereals including wheat and wide spreads globally. D. dipsaci is economically more important on rye and oat than wheat and barley. It was considered an important factor in low wheat yields when associated with Fusarium spp. (McDonal and Nicol, 2005). D. dipsaci has also been recorded on wheat by researchers in Pakistan (Maqbool and Shahina, 2001; Zarina and Shahina, 2012); however, the economic damage is not so obvious. Erum and Shahina (2010) during the taxonomic studies of plant and soil nematodes associate with wheat reported two new records of stem nematodes viz., D. emus (Khan et al. 1969) and D. medicaginis (Wasilewska, 1965) from Tandojam, Sindh, Pakistan while Ditylenchus geraerti (Paramonov, 1970) Bello and Geraert (1972) was reported as a new record species of wheat from district Hunza, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan (Sagir, 2019).
Root-lesion nematodes, Pratylenchus spp.
Root-lesion nematodes, Pratylenchus spp. have been reported from wheat-growing areas of the world, causing damage to the wheat crop. More than eight species of root-lesion nematodes have been recorded on small grains. Among the four species viz., P. thorei, P. neglectus, P. crenatus and P. penetrans have worldwide distribution in cereals. P. thornei is considered the economically most important species associated with wheat including in Pakistan. Yield loss of 38-85% on what has been reported in Australia, 10-40% in Mexico and 70% in Israel (McDonal and Nicol, 2005; Dababat et al., 2016). High populations of Pratylenchus are frequently associated with poorly growing cereals but data on damage are sparsely (Rivoal and Cook, 1993). The other crops of economic importance attacked by this nematode include wheat, maize, cotton, potato, rice, banana, vegetables, ornamentals and fruits (Khan, 2015). From Pakistan 5-6 species of the lesion nematodes have been recorded from wheat by different researchers (Maqbool and Shahina, 2001). Later on P. delatterei was encountered as a new record species from wheat plants at Hamdard University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan (Erum and Shahina, 2010; Zarina and Shahina, 2012; Erum et al., 2021).
Conclusion and Recommendations
The updated information about the plant parasitic nematodes associated with wheat in Pakistan has been presented. Plant-parasitic nematodes can substantially reduce crop yield. A diverse fauna of plant parasitic nematodes mainly, cyst nematodes have been reported from several prime growing areas of Pakistan.
The use of nematicides has been drastically limited, and farmers have few chemical options. Numerous nematode management tactics have been banned (aldicarb, cadusafos, carbofuran, ethoprofos, chloropicrin, 1,3 dichloropropene, methyl bromide, and others). The use in chemo-irrigation may significantly reduce production costs and do not allow farmers to maintain the profitability of crops and crop quality. It’s vital to note that each nematode genera and species has its own resistance in a crop. One of the most environmentally beneficial techniques of nematode management with zero environmental impact is to use natural products. None of the methods is effective by itself in all situations and control is best when measures are combined.
Novelty Statement
In this review article status of global wheat production is presented and its associated parasitic nematodes have been discussed with reference to chronological research data related to Pakistan.
Author’s Contribution
Erum Iqbal: Collected the data, part of the manuscript is from the PhD thesis, wrote manuscript.
Firoza Kazi: Wrote the manuscript.
Saboohi Raza: Supervised the work.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Ajmal-uddin, Ahmad, M., Watto, F.M., Ahmed, S., Ali, I. and Shah, M.K.N., 2020. Drought tolerance screening in thirty common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Sarhad J. Agric., 36: 168-177.
Akhtar, S.A., 1962. Free-living nematodes inhabiting Lahore soils. Agric. Pak., 13: 64-80.
Ali, M.A., Mahpara, S., Zahoor, A., Dababat, A.A., Toktay, H., Bakhsh, A., Nawaz, M.A. and Li, H., 2019. Resistance to cereal cyst nematodes in wheat and barley: An emphasis on classical and modern approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020432
Anwar, S.A., Gorsi, S., Haq, M.A., Tahir-ur-Rehman and Yousuf, P., 1991. Plant parasitic nematodes of some field, vegetable, fruit and ornamental crops. J. Agric. Res., 29: 233-249.
Bello, A. and Geraert, E. 1972. Redescriptions of eight species belonging to the superfamily Tylenchoidea (Nematoda: Tylenchida). Nematologica, 18, 190-200.
Bhatti, D.S. and Dahiya, R.S., 1992. Nematode pests of wheat and barley-Heterodera avenae. In: Bhatti, D. S. and Walia, R. K. (Eds.) Nematode Pests of Crops. CBS Publ. Distribut., Delhi, India. pp. 27-42.
Blyuss, K.B., Fatehi, F., Tsygankova, V.A., Biliavska, L.O., Iutynska, G.O., Yemets, A.I. and Blume, Y.B., 2019. RNAi-based biocontrol of wheat nematodes using natural poly-component biostimulants. Front. Plant Sci., 10: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00483
Braun, H.J., Atlin, G. and Payne, T., 2010. Multi-location testing as a tool to identify plant response to global climate change. In: Reynolds, C.R.P. (Ed.) Climate change and crop production. CABI, Publishing, Wallingford, London, UK, pp. 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936334.0115
Chen, Z.X., Chen, S.Y. and Dickson, D.W., 2004. Nematology advances and perspective, Vol. II. Nematode management and utilization. Tsinghua University Press, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 1234. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996462.0000
Chitwood, D.J., 2003. Research on plant-parasitic nematode biology conducted by the United States department of agriculture-agricultural research service. Pest Manag. Sci., 59: 748-753. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.684
Dababat, A. and Fourie, H., 2018. Nematode parasites of cereals. In: Sikora, R.A., Coyne, D., Hallmann, J. and Timper, P., (Eds.). Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture. New York, USA, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 163-221. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786391247.0163
Dababat, A.A., Ferney, G.B.H., Erginbaş-Orakci, G., Dreisigacker, S., Imren, M., Toktay, H., Elekcioglu, H.I., Mekete, T., Nicol, J.M., Ansari, O. and Ogbonnaya, F., 2016. Association analysis of resistance to cereal cyst nematodes (Heterodera avenae) and root lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei) in CIMMYT advanced spring wheat lines for semi-arid conditions. Breeding Sci., 66: 692-702. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.15158
Dababat, A., Imren, M., Erginbas, O.G., Ashrafi, S. and Yavuzaslanoglu, E., 2015. The importance and management strategies of cereal cyst nematodes, Heterodera spp., in Turkey. Euphytica, 202: 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1269-z
Erum, Y.I. and Shahina, F., 2008. Description of Atetylenchus metaporus sp. n. (Nematoda: Psilenchidae) from Pakistan. J. Nematode Morphol. Syst., 11: 129-135.
Erum, Y.I. and Shahina, F., 2010. Taxonomic studies on parasitic and soil nematodes found associated with wheat in Pakistan. Pak. J. Nematol., 28: 1-58.
Erum, Y.I., 2011. Investigation of the genetic diversity of wheat germplasm against cyst nematodes. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Botany, National Nematological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan, pp. 363.
Erum, I., Soomro, M.H., Firoza, K. and Saboohi, R., 2021. Global wheat production and its economically important nematode pests. National Nematological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan, pp. 35.
Filipjev, I.N., 1936. On the classification of the Tylenchinae. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Washington, 3: 80-82.
Firoza, K. and Maqbool, M.A., 1993. Three new species of the subfamily Hoplolaiminae (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan J. Nematol., 11: 69-78.
Golden, A.M., Maqboo, M.A. and Handoo, Z.A., 1987. Descriptions of two new species of Tylenchorhynchus Cobb, 1913 (Nematoda: Tylenchida), with details on morphology and variation of T. claytoni. J. Nematol., 19: 58-68.
GOP, 2019-20. Pakistan Economic Survey 2019-20. Finance Division, Government of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 516.
Gul, A. and Saeed, M., 1990. A survey of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) in North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan. Sarhad J. Agric., 6: 495-502.
Handoo, Z.A., Iqbal, E.Y., Nasira, K. and Shahina, F., 2010. Two new species of Paurodontella Husain and Khan, 1968 (Nematoda: Sphaerulariidae) associated with wheat and a diagnostic compendium to the genus. Nematology, 12: 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854109X461730
Haque, Z. and Khan, M.R., 2021. Handbook of invasive plant parasitic nematodes. CAB Intenational, Wallingford, UK, pp. 520.
Imren, M., Yildiz, S., Çiftçi, V. and Dababat, A., 2019. Effect of cereal cyst nematode Heterodera filipjevi on wheat yields in Turkey. Turk. J. Agric. For., 43: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1902-17
Kanwar, R.S. and Bajaj, H.K., 2010. Cereal cyst nematode infestation in wheat. In: Khan, M. R. and Jairajpuri, M. S. (Eds.) nematode infestation, Part-I: Food crops. The National Academy of Sciences, Allahabad, India, pp. 192-217.
Kaushal, K.K., Sharma, G.L. and Paruthi, I.J., 2001. Nematode diseases of wheat and barley and their management. In: national congress on centenary of nematology in India appraisal and future plans, 5-7 December, 2001, Division of Nematology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India, pp. 23-24.
Khan, A., 2011. Nematodes of wheat in Pakistan and their control. VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, pp. 108.
Khan, A.M. and Hussain, S.I., 1965. Heterodera mothi n. sp. (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) parasitizing Cyprus rotundus L. at Aligarh, U.P., India. Nematologica, 2: 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529265X00032
Khan, E., Chawla, M. L. and Prasad, S. K. 1969. Tylenchus (Aglenchus) indicus n. sp. and Ditylenchus emus n. sp. (Nematoda: Tylenchidae) from India. Labdev J. Sci. Tech. 7 (4), 311-314.
Khan, A., Bilqees, F.M. and Islam, S., 2003. Checklist of nematodes associated with cereals in Pakistan. Proc. Parasitol., 35: 63-92.
Khan, M.R., 2015. Nematode diseases of crops in India. In: Awasthi, L.P. (Ed.) recent advances in the diagnosis and management of plant diseases. Springer, India. pp. 183-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2571-3_16
Koshy, P.K., Swarup, G. and Sethi, C.L., 1971. Heterodera zeae n. sp. (Nematoda: Heteroderidae), a cyst-forming nematode on Zea mays. Nematologica, 16: 511-516. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529270X00694
Kuhn, 1857. Uber das Vorkommen von Anguillulen inerkrankten Bluhtenkopfen von Dipsacus fullonum L. Z. Wiss. Zool., 9: 129-137.
Maqbool, M.A., and Shahina, F., 1986. New species of cyst nematode Heterodera pakistanensis (Nematoda: Heteroderidae) attacking wheat in Pakistan. J. Nematol., 18: 541-548.
Maqbool, M.A. and Shahina, F., 1987. Description of two new and data on three known species of the genus Tylenchus Bastian, 1865 (Nematoda: Tylenchidae) from Pakistan with a key to the species of Tylenchus. Pak. J. Nematol., 5: 53-67.
Maqbool, M.A. and Shahina, F., 2001. Systematics and distribution: Biodiversity of nematode fauna in Pakistan. National Nematological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan, pp. 179.
Maqbool, M.A., 1980. Occurrence of eight cyst nematodes on some agricultural crops in Pakistan. J. Sci., 8: 103-108.
Maqbool, M.A., 1981. Occurrence of root-knot and cyst nematodes in Pakistan. Nematol. Mediterr., 9: 211-212.
Maqbool, M.A., 1986. Classification and distribution of plant parasitic nematodes in Pakistan. National Nematological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan, pp. 58.
Maqbool, M.A., 1988a. Present status of research on plant parasitic nematodes in cereals and food and forage legumes in Pakistan. In: Saxena, M.S., Sikora, R.A. and Srivastava, J.P. (Eds.) nematodes parasitic to cereals and legumes in temperate semi-arid regions. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria, pp. 173-180.
Maqbool, M.A., 1988b. An overview of nematode problem and research in Pakistan. In: Maqbool, M.A., Golden, A.M., Ghaffar, A. and Krusberg, L.R. (Eds.). Adv. Plant Nematol. Proc. US-Pak. Int. Works. Plant Nematol., pp. 23-46.
Maqbool, M.A., 1992. Distribution and host association of nematodes in Pakistan. National Nematological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi, pp. 215.
Maqbool, M.A., Ghazala, P. and Fatima, N., 1984. Two new species of the family Dolichodoridae (Nematoda: Tylenchida) from Pakistan. Pak. J. Nematol., 2: 61-67.
McDonald, A.H. and Nicol, J.M., 2005. Nematode parasites of cereals. In: Luc, M., Sikora, R.A. and Bridge, J. (Ed.). Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture. New York, USA: CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 131-191. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851997278.0131
Paramonov, A.A. 1970. Principles of Phytonematology. Vol. III. Taxonomy of nematodes of the superfamily Tylenchoidea. Izdatelstvo “Nauka”, Moscow, 253 pp.
Pathak, V. and Shrivastav, S., 2015. Biochemical studies on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 4: 171-175.
Peng, D.L., Nicol, J.M., Li, H.M., Hou, S.Y., Li, H.X. and Chen, S.L., 2009. Current knowledge of cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) on wheat in China. In: Riley, I.T., Nicol, J.M. and Dababat, A.A. (Eds.) cereal cyst nematodes: status, research and outlook (Ankara: CIMMYT), pp. 29-34.
Rivoal, R. and Cook, R., 1993. Nematode pests of cereals. In. Evans, K., Trudgill, D.L. and Webster, J.M. (Eds.) Plant parasitic nematodes in temperate agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 259-303.
Sagir, H., 2019. Important plant parasitic nematodes of cereals, fruits and vegetables of districts Hunza, Nager, Gilgit and Ghizer of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Ph. D. thesis. National Nematological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan, pp. 245.
Sattar, A. and Hafiz, A., 1952. Researches on plant diseases of the Punjab. Scientific Monograph No. 1. Association for the Advancement of Science, Lahore, pp. 158.
Schmidt, A., 1871. Über den Rübennematoden (Heterodera schachtii A.S.). Zeitschrift der Vereinte Rübenzuckerindustrie Zollverein, 21: 1-19.
Sehgal, I. and Robotka, B., 2020. Pakistan’s cash crops wheat production (Part Ii). Daily Times, 17 April, 2020. https://dailytimes.com.pk
Shahina, F. and Erum, Y.I., 2007. Distribution of cyst nematodes in Pakistan. In: Firoza, K., Shahina, F. and Soomro, M.H. (Eds.). Proceedings of 6th nematological conference and workshop: Integrated disease management (INDM) in some cereals, fruit and vegetables of Pakistan. Pak. J. Nematol., 25: 29-35.
Shahina, F. and Maqbool, M.A., 1990. Distribution of corn cyst and cereal cyst nematodes in Pakistan. Int. Nematol. Netw. Newsl., 7: 38-40.
Shahina, F., Sonum, K., Shaheen, F. and Erum, Y.I., 2019. Preparation of botanical product (NNRC-82) effective against agricultural pests (Patent filed).
Shahina, F., Maqbool, M.A. and Ghaffar, A., 1989. Screening of some wheat varieties for resistance against Anguina tritici. Pak. J. Nematol., 7: 61-65.
Sharma, G.L., 2003. Cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in Rajasthan. In: Trivedi, P.C. (Ed.) Advances in nematology. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India. pp. 73-79.
Shewry, P.R. and Hey, S.J., 2015. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur., 4: 178-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.64
Smiley, R.W., Dababat, A.A., Sadia, I., Jones, M.G.K., Maafi, Z.T., Peng, D., Subbotin, S.A. and Waeyenberge, L., 2017. Cereal cyst nematodes: A complex and destructive group of Heterodera species. Plant Dis., 101: 1692-1720. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-17-0355-FE
Solangi, G.R., Wondiar, M. and Khuhro, I., 1982. Parasitic nematodes associated with wheat fields in Sindh. J. Agric. Res., 11: 50-57.
Steinbuch, J.G., 1799. Das Grasalchen, Vibrio agrostis. Natur-serforscher, Halle, 28: 233-259.
Subbotin, S.A., Mundo-Ocampo, M. and Baldwin, J.G., 2010a. Systematics of cyst nematodes (Nematoda: Heteroderinae); Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, Volume 8A, pp. 351. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004164345.i-512
Subbotin, S.A., Mundo-Ocampo, M. and Baldwin, J.G., 2010b. Systematics of cyst nematodes (Nematoda: Heteroderinae); Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, Volume 8B, pp. 512. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004164345.i-512
Wasilewska, L. 1965. D. medicaginis sp. n. a new parasitic nematode from Poland (Nematoda: Tylenchidae) Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Zool., 13, 167-170.
Wollenweber, H.W., 1924. ZurKenntnis der Kartoffel-Heteroderen. Illustr. Landwirtsch. Ztg., 44: 100-101.
Zarina, B. and Shahina, F., 2012. Annonated bibliography on nematology in Pakistan 2nd Edition. National Nematological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan, pp. 850.
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?