Review on Potential of Poplar (Populus deltoides) Based Agroforestry for Economic Benefits and Climate Change Mitigation
Review Article
Review on Potential of Poplar (Populus deltoides) Based Agroforestry for Economic Benefits and Climate Change Mitigation
Ali Nawaz, Qazi Bilal, Anwar Ali*, Nowsherwan Zarif, Faizan Ahmad, Asim Karim and Atif Majeed
Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar-25130, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Abstract | The world is experiencing increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, increasing temperatures, precipitation fluctuation patterns, and other climate change impacts due to increased fossil fuel consumption which affects community activities. Poplar (Populus deltoides) is a fast-growing tree species that grows extensively on farmlands in order to fulfill socioeconomic needs as well as climate mitigation and adaptation. The current study reviewed the social, economic and environmental significance of Eastern Cottonwood based agroforestry system. The current economic review of Populus deltoides shows that average net return and average net present value are 11121USD ha-1, INR. 793,579 ha-1 with benefit cost ratio of 2.45. The land expectation value and internal rate of return were found 9570USD ha-1 and 11121USD ha-1, with an internal rate of return 52 % ha-1. The review concluded that the potential of poplar (Populus deltoides) based agroforestry system can be utilized by overcoming financial, technical, and institutional barriers for planned adaptation.
Received | October 12, 2022; Accepted | November 19, 2022; Published | December 26, 2022
*Correspondence | Anwar Ali, Director, Forestry Research Division, Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar-25130, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Nawaz, A., Bilal, Q., Ali, A., Zarif, N., Ahmad, F., Karim, A. and Majeed, A., 2022. Review on potential of poplar (Populus deltoides) based agroforestry for economic benefits and climate change mitigation. Pakistan Journal of Forestry, 72(2): 84-93.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.PJF/2022/72.2.84.93
Keywords | Poplar (Populus deltoides), Productivity, Net Return Value (NRV), Climate change mitigation
Copyright: 2022 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Poplar (Populus deltoides), commonly referred to as eastern cottonwood or eastern poplar, is famed for its production of fluffy seeds that bear a resemblance to snow when they descend to the ground. In Azad Jammu and Kashmir, this tree species is also known by various names, including Eastern Cottonwood, Plains Cottonwood, Rio Grande Cottonwood, and Plains Poplar Rousee Poplar (AJK) according to (Krishnakumar et al., 2011). The term poplar (Populus deltoides) originates from the Greek word delta, which pertains to three-sided figures like triangles or deltas (www.nzpcn.org.nz).
The poplar (Populus deltoides) tree is medium to large in size, reaching heights of 20-30 meters (maximum 50 m), with a diameter at breast height of 100 cm. Its bark has a grayish-green color and smooth texture, transitioning to a blackish hue with furrows as it matures. The trunk appears short and sturdy in open spaces, frequently splitting into several broad, widely spreading limbs close to the ground. This gives rise to a broad, unevenly shaped open crown, as described previously according to (Orwa et al., 2009).
Poplar (Populus deltoides) is a renowned agroforestry species originating in North America. It has significant economic value in the agroforestry sector according to (Singh, 2016). Recognized as eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.), this rapidly growing tree is a prime contender for short-rotation cultivation for biofuel production. Its cultivation spans Asia, Europe, and North America according to (Dipesh et al., 2017). In various developing nations, it has been introduced and nurtured as an agroforestry resource, coexisting with agricultural crops and adapting to local climate conditions over time (Sheikh, 1993).
Materials and Methods
A comprehensive literature search was initiated with help of electronic databases, including Science Direct (https://www.sciencedirect.com), Scopus (https://www.scopus.com/home.uri) and Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/), Research Gate (https://www.researchgate.net/) and Sci hub and Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet (https://www.diva-portal.org/) Additionally, we collected further records from review articles and research articles that met our initial eligibility criteria. The search was performed using a combination of keywords i.e., Populus deltoides, productivity, net return value, benefit: cost ratio, biomass and carbon sequestration. The search was limited to articles published between 1993 and 2023. The review paper comprises of (1) Introduction, (2) Review Methodology, (3) Economic returns, (4) Climate change mitigation and (5) Challenges in Poplar based agroforestry system.
The methodological quality assessment was done by economic benefit factors such as net return value, benefit cost ration, land expectation value, plantation spacing. While the climate mitigation parameters were biomass per hectare, carbon stock per hectare.
Productivity of poplar (Populus deltoides)
Poplar (Populus deltoides) was found at altitudes of up to 1000 m, where the typical yearly temperature varies from 8 to 14°C, and the average annual precipitation ranges from 600 to 1500 mm. While P. deltoids can survive on unproductive sandy soils, sandy loams, and somewhat compact clays, it thrives in damp, adequately drained, fine, sandy loams, or silts located close to streams, with a pH level spanning from 4.5 to 8 according to (Orwa et al., 2009).
Poplar (Populus deltoides) has the potential to reproduce naturally and artificially through regeneration. However, natural regeneration is infrequent from seeds, except in specific conditions such as landslides, recently thawed soil, and waterways. Cottonwood plantations cultivate in tropical and subtropical regions, which are also considered favorable for cultivating various other agricultural products such as sugarcane, wheat, potatoes, mustard, corn, legumes, vegetables, forage crops, and medicinal plants according to (Kumar and Yadav, 2022a).
The primary determinant of productivity in any vegetation system is the ability of its various components to generate biomass and store carbon influenced by factors such as the type and age of plants, as well as environmental elements like climate, soil properties, terrain, and other living organisms according to (Chaturvedi et al., 2016). Depending on a company’s scale, gains ranging from 38.8% to 100.90% of initial investments have been documented within a year through the cultivation of nursery plants according to (Anita and Anubha, 2020). Poplar (Populus deltoides) exhibits rapid growth, with Mean Annual Increment (MAI) of 20-25 m3/ha/yr in block and boundary plantations in farmers’ fields. The reported yield is 1.125 million m3/yr, with a range of 20-40 m3/ha/yr in Pakistan according to (Sheikh, 1993).
In Pakistan, at a rotation age of 8-12 years, the trees produce an average annual yield of 10-30 m3/ha, while in India, a study according to (Krishnakumar et al., 2010) records an annual yield of 46.92 m3/ha. Poplars are characterized by their rapid growth, achieving a height of around 25 m and a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 30 cm within 6 to 8 years. The average MAI for poplar plantations varies from 20 to 25 m3/ha/year according to (Anita and Anubha, 2020).
Economic returns- poplar (Populus deltoides) based agroforestry system
Poplar based agroforestry practices encompass an approximate land area of 1 billion hectares and engage over 1.2 billion individuals globally according to (Ghale et al., 2022). Agroforestry involving poplar trees and flowering annuals presents significant prospects for enhancing agricultural variety and achieving greater yields in comparison to conventional crops grown in open fields or beneath poplar tree cover, as indicated by the findings according to (Rani et al., 2011). Poplar (Populus deltoides) is renowned for its rapid growth, vegetative reproduction, and soil enhancement capabilities. This tree variety not only provides an extra income source for farmers but also yields valuable raw materials used in the production of diverse items such as plywood, paper pulp, furniture, fiberboard, veneer, spors equipment, newsprint, high-quality paper, packaging material, and match splints, as according to (Singh and Lodhiyal, 2009). Apart from supplying ecosystem services and mitigating human impacts on natural forests, agroforestry generates benefits and revenue through carbon capture, wood-based energy, increased soil fertility, and the amelioration of local climatic conditions, as outlined in the study by (Mbow et al., 2014). The sorghum-berseem based poplar planation of 10 × 2 m spacing at rotation of 12 years shows the highest net returns of INR. 1,191,241 ha-1, NPV at rate of 12% discounting 409,673 ha–1), Benefit cost ratio was found 1: 2.22, IRR (70%), while highest land equivalent ratio (2.28) and land expectation value (INR 2, 242, 372 ha–1 according to (Chavan and Dhillon, 2019).
The optimal rotation ages were 10 and 8 years for 3m × 3m and 3m × 4m density, respectively in case economic value of timber. Optimal rotation ages in case of carbon sequestration along with timber value was increased to 14 and 11 years for the same two densities, respectively (Abedi et al., 2022).
Table 1 shows the cost and income analysis from intercrop as well as poplar plantation indicated that B-C ratio was 2.87, internal rate of return was 57.50 % and net present worth was USD 14772 Ha-1 (Harinder and Murthy, 2016). For one year old entire transplants (ETPs) of poplar, the costs incurred were US$ 4.82 per tree for 8 years including labour, irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides and fungicides, technical advice, insurance premium etc. (Jain and Singh, 2000).
The average net return is 1,026,055 at rotation age of 7 years for one hectare of planation. The net present value (NPV) of poplar plantation for an area of one hectare is 353,688 at rotation of 7 year and 9 per cent discount rate and the net discounted return. The calculated benefit-cost ratio of 1:2.44 was found at this discount rate of interest The overall internal rate of return was found 39.06 % ha-1 of poplar planation which proved that Poplar plantation is economically viable (Pankaj et al., 2016). The undiscounted returns depend upon the age of poplar while using net discounting criteria, the returns are highest at the age of 4th year if cost of capital is 15 % and above in case of agro-forestry systems AFS-I (wheat + kharif fodder for the 1st four years) and AFS-II (sugarcane for first two years and wheat during 3–4 years) of poplar plantation according to (Singh and Kaur, 2020).
Agroforestry is economically viable at the discount rate of 10% over 8 years rotation using Net present worth and benefit: cost ratio. The internal rate of return is more than 36 % at 8 years of rotation age according to (Sharma et al., 2020). While considering its economic value of carbon sequestration, 27 years are its optimal rotation age according to (Abedi et al., 2023) as shown in Table 1.
Agroforestry practices involving Poplar (Populus deltoides) trees offer valuable mitigation and adaptation strategies for enhancing food security, particularly for small-scale farmers. This underscores the critical importance of prioritizing Agroforestry on a global scale due to its manifold socio-environmental
Table 1: Economic benefits of poplar based agroforestry system.
S. No |
NR/ha |
NPV (INR /ha) |
B:C |
IRR (%/ha) |
LER |
LEV |
Age |
Spacing (m) |
Agroforestry system |
Source |
1 |
549,367 |
222951 |
1: 1.65 |
85 |
1220337 |
8 |
15 × 9 |
Sorghum-wheat |
(Chavan et al., 2022) |
|
2 |
1,191,241 |
409,673 |
1: 2.22 |
70 |
2.28 |
2,242,372 |
12 |
10 × 2 |
Sorghum-berseem |
(Chavan and Dhillon, 2019) |
1,026,055 |
353,688 |
1; 2.44 |
39.06 |
- |
7 |
- |
Sole land |
(Pankaj et al., 2016) |
||
4 |
- |
1,228,162 |
1: 2.87 |
57.5 |
- |
- |
8 |
6 × 1.5 |
Raprian wetland |
(Harider and Mavi, 2016) |
5 |
- |
1,284,000 |
1: 2.94 |
40.55 |
- |
- |
10 |
3 × 4 |
Sorghum berseem trifolium |
(Himshikha et al., 2018) |
6 |
- |
1,263,000 |
1:2.62 |
22.43 |
- |
- |
9 |
- |
Sorghum-trifolium |
NR= Net Returns, NPV= Net Present Value, B:C= Benefit Coat ratio, IRR= Internal Rate of Return, LER= Land Expectation Return, LEV= Land Expectation Value, USD= US Dollars
advantages. The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) values demonstrated that agroforestry systems outperformed monocultures by 36–100%, with LER ranging from 1.36 to 2.00. A comparison between Denmark and the United Kingdom revealed that the agroforestry gross margin was higher in the UK (€5083 ha/year) compared to Denmark (€112 ha/year). Moreover, the agricultural component generated greater profits than the tree component, leading to an adverse impact according to (Lehmann et al., 2020).
Table 2: Biomass and carbon table of Popoulus deltoides (Poplar) growing on farmlands.
DBH (cm) |
Height (m) |
Dry biomass (t) |
Carbon (t) |
DBH (cm) |
Height (m) |
Dry Biomass (t) |
Carbon (t) |
6 |
8.13 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
54 |
26.59 |
1.019 |
0.479 |
8 |
10.55 |
0.010 |
0.005 |
56 |
26.89 |
1.105 |
0.519 |
10 |
12.42 |
0.019 |
0.009 |
58 |
27.19 |
1.195 |
0.562 |
12 |
13.95 |
0.030 |
0.014 |
60 |
27.47 |
1.289 |
0.606 |
14 |
15.25 |
0.044 |
0.021 |
62 |
27.75 |
1.386 |
0.652 |
16 |
16.37 |
0.061 |
0.029 |
64 |
28.02 |
1.488 |
0.699 |
18 |
17.36 |
0.081 |
0.038 |
66 |
28.27 |
1.593 |
0.748 |
20 |
18.25 |
0.104 |
0.049 |
68 |
28.53 |
1.702 |
0.800 |
22 |
19.05 |
0.130 |
0.061 |
70 |
28.77 |
1.815 |
0.853 |
24 |
19.78 |
0.160 |
0.075 |
72 |
29.01 |
1.931 |
0.908 |
26 |
20.45 |
0.193 |
0.091 |
74 |
29.24 |
2.052 |
0.964 |
28 |
21.07 |
0.229 |
0.108 |
76 |
29.46 |
2.176 |
1.023 |
30 |
21.67 |
0.269 |
0.126 |
78 |
29.68 |
2.304 |
1.083 |
32 |
22.19 |
0.312 |
0.146 |
80 |
29.89 |
2.436 |
1.145 |
34 |
22.7 |
0.358 |
0.168 |
82 |
30.1 |
2.573 |
1.209 |
36 |
23.18 |
0.408 |
0.192 |
84 |
30.3 |
2.713 |
1.275 |
38 |
23.64 |
0.461 |
0.217 |
86 |
30.5 |
2.857 |
1.343 |
40 |
24.07 |
0.518 |
0.244 |
88 |
30.69 |
3.004 |
1.412 |
42 |
24.48 |
0.579 |
0.272 |
90 |
30.88 |
3.156 |
1.483 |
44 |
24.87 |
0.643 |
0.302 |
92 |
31.07 |
3.313 |
1.557 |
46 |
25.24 |
0.711 |
0.334 |
94 |
31.25 |
3.473 |
1.632 |
48 |
25.6 |
0.782 |
0.368 |
96 |
31.42 |
3.636 |
1.709 |
50 |
25.94 |
0.857 |
0.403 |
98 |
31.6 |
3.804 |
1.788 |
52 |
26.27 |
0.936 |
0.440 |
100 |
31.77 |
3.976 |
1.869 |
Source: (Ali, 2020). Derived from developed biomass model M= 0.0194 (D2H)0.9654. H= -6.9198+8.4004lnD. Where M is the dry biomass in Kg, D is DBH in cm, H is the height in m and ln is the natural log.
In order to protect the extensive cottonwood forests that exist on the natural floodplain of unaltered sections of the Missouri River in the United States, either to counteract potential future losses due to natural aging and ecological progression, it is essential for such tree planting efforts to be conducted consistently and on a large scale according to (Dixon et al., 2012). Economic analysis of Poplar (Populus deltoides) revealed that a poplar plantation established along an east-west boundary exhibited the highest net profits at $6,639 per hectare, the lowest net present value at $2,694 per hectare, and the highest LEV at $14,748 per hectare according to (Chavan et al., 2022) Poplar (Populus deltoides) wood obtained from a farm was typically sold for $44.0 USD, while subsistence, economically-oriented, and above-economic farms generated revenues of $20.5, $20.5, and $95 per unit, respectively. The significant correlation between globalization and agroforestry lies in the fact that 65% of non-agroforestry farmers were categorized as medium cosmopolites according to (Singh and Lodhiyal, 2009).
The predominant sales in Pakistan involve the trade of a single Populus deltoides tree, characterized by a 10-inch diameter and 20-foot height, fetching prices exceeding PKR. 850/- according to (Usman et al., 2022). The net present value was ranged from 1105.54 € ha−1 (Baseline) to 9620.30 € ha−1 (Optimum) after 12 years with 4 rotations of 3 years as result of coppice silvicultural system. Land rent (31.88 %), irrigation (16.61 %), and cut-and-chip harvesting (11.87 %) are most critical cost factors according to (Fuertes et al., 2021).
The current economic review of the Populus deltoides showed that average net return and average net present value are INR. 922,221 ha-1, INR. 793,579 ha-1 with B:C of 2.45, respectively. The land expectation value, and land internal rate of return were found INR. 922,221 ha-1 and INR. 793,579 ha-with internal rate of return 52 % ha-1.
Climate change mitigative significance
In pursuit of net-zero emissions targets, nations and corporations are contemplating strategies to counterbalance remaining greenhouse gas emissions according to (COP 26, 2021). Employing carbon capture techniques, agroforestry plays a crucial role in diminishing greenhouse gas emissions compared to atmospheric carbon dioxide levels according to (Rizvi et al., 2019). The practice of agroforestry has gained increased prominence as a means of carbon storage (C) and addressing global climate change, especially since the Kyoto Protocol according to (Murthy, 2013). Agroforestry systems offer substantial opportunities to integrate both adaptation and mitigation measures, enhancing the system’s resilience against the adverse effects of climate change according to (Jose and Bardhan, 2012).
Agroforestry, a well-known sustainable land use approach according to (Dhakal and Rai, 2020), involves incorporating Poplar (Populus deltoides) plantings into various agroforestry systems. Poplar based Agroforestry system offers an alternate avenue for addressing climate change impacts and its mitigation due to contribute to increased biomass production and carbon storage which is the technological options for enhancing carbon capture, sequestration, and safeguarding carbon reservoirs according to (Kumar and Yadav, 2022; Nnko, 2022).
Populus deltoides W. Bartram ex Marshall is one of the most fast-growing species which has potential economically for wood production and environmentally for biomass production and carbon sequestration (Abedi et al., 2023). Globally 4000 million area of Land under agroforestry which has potential to sequester 26 Tg Carbon by 2010 and 45 Tg Carbon by 2040 with mean carbon sequestration of 0.72 Mg ha-1yr-1 (Yadava, 2010).
The calculated net present value of carbon and its sensitivity analysis for price and carbon interest rate were found 180.2 m3/ha (57.6 t/ha) with carbon content of 32.2 t/ha at the age 36 years the plantation stock which proved that the net present value depend upon the price and interest rate according to (Abedi et al., 2022).
The Figure 4 shows contribution percent of various component of 8-year-old Poplar (Populus deltoides) agroforestry plantation Poplar tree to carbon sequestration growing on farmlands are bole wood, bole bark, branch, twig, leaf, stump root, lateral root and fine root are 49.73% (47.85 t ha-1), 7 % (6.74 t ha-1), 10.61 % (10.21 t ha-1), 4.53% (4.35 t ha-1), 6.81% (12.43 t ha-1), 12.92% (6.55 t ha-1), 7.27% (6.99 t ha-1) and 1.13% (1.08 t ha-1) with total carbon stock of 96.23 t ha-1 according to (Singh and Lodhiyal, 2009).
The predicted total carbon storage from existing alley cropping (211,938 hectares), riparian buffers (640,732 hectares), silvo-pasture (34 million hectares), and windbreak (2.37 million hectares) techniques amounts to 219 Tg yr-1. The cumulative carbon storage could reach 240 teragrams per year through the adoption of additional practices, namely converting 5% of US cropland to alley cropping (yielding 3.7 Tg yr-1), implementing 15-meter-wide riparian buffers on both sides of 5% of total stream length (resulting in 4.75 Tg yr-1), transitioning 34 million hectares to silvopasture (contributing 207 Tg yr-1), and establishing windbreaks on 5% of cropland (7.45 million hectares, producing 25 Tg yr-1). The utilization of agroforestry based on poplar trees has demonstrated the augmentation of soil organic carbon and nitrogen stores in the soil according to (Sharma et al., 2015). Soil carbon sequestration represents a significant method for carbon removal, and there is an increasing interest in policy and corporate circles to explore methods to incentivize farmers to enhance carbon sequestration efforts according to (Buck et al., 2022).
The global stock of SOC in the top 1-meter layer of soil is approximately 1500 × 109 metric tons (t) which is a significant amount of carbon stored in the Earth’s soil according to (FAO, 2017). Considered to be twice the amount found in the atmosphere indicating that soils are a crucial carbon reservoir, potentially helping mitigate the impacts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere according to (Ali, 2020). About 40% of the world’s SOC is present in forest ecosystems which underscores the significant role that forests play in sequestering carbon and highlights their importance in global carbon cycling and climate change mitigation efforts according to (Hudson et al., 1994).
Gaps and challenges
An important deficiency in economic assessments is the omission of ecological and societal advantages and external impacts. Instances like offering compensation for ecosystem contributions or employing incentives to encourage farmers and land users to shift towards more socially beneficial land utilization exemplify this gap according to (Kay et al., 2019).
Factors that have been recognized as impacting the adoption of agroforestry practices include how farmers view agroforestry, the socioeconomic circumstances they come from, and challenges such as unfavorable crop conditions, absence of viable markets, insufficient availability of nurseries, harm caused by human and animal activities, and a shortage of motivating incentives according to (Irshad et al., 2011).
The main socio-economic factors influencing farmers’ choices to encourage and embrace agroforestry techniques encompass household stability, availability of funds and rewards, workforce, gender roles, land ownership, farm dimensions, and managerial proficiency. While factors like landscape features, soil varieties, and climate play a role in plant growth, studies demonstrate that these socio-economic elements play a pivotal role in deciding whether agroforestry is implemented in practice according to (Glover et al., 2013).
To effectively cultivate trees on their agricultural plots, there is a need for guidance and technical support, which currently lacks due to insufficient cooperation with the forest department. Farmers who do manage to incorporate trees into their farmland encounter challenges related to the marketing and transportation of their products according to (Nouman et al., 2008).
Conclusions and Recommendations
Poplar based agroforestry system plays in mitigation of climate change by long term carbon storage and sequestration which considered cost effective sink for the reduction of greenhouse gas emission. The current economic review of the Populus deltoides concluded that average net return and average net present value are INR. 922,221 ha-1, INR. 793,579 ha-1 with B:C of 2.45, respectively. The land expectation value, and land internal rate of return were found INR. 922,221 ha-1 and INR. 793,579 ha-with internal rate of return 52 % ha-1.
It can be concluded that sustainable land use system can be achieved by Poplar based agroforestry systems which help in enhancing the biological yield (biomass), soil carbon and fertility as well as other ecosystem services from same piece of land. The socioeconomic factors are challenging for adaptation of Poplar based agroforestry system.
Acknowledgement
The authors appreciate the members of the Forestry Research Division at the Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar (PFI) for their valuable suggestions. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
Novelty Statement
In contrast to existing literature that predominantly focuses economic and mitigative aspects on the Populus deltoides.
Author’s Contribution
Anwar Ali, Conceptualization, Ali Nawaz: Writing–original draft, Nowsherwan Zarif, Investigation, Asim Karim, Visualization, Qazi Bilal Ahmed: Writing–review Faizan Ahmad: editing and correction.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
Abedi, T., Abedi, R., Modaberi, H. and Pourbabaei, H., 2023. Investigation of carbon sequestration model according to independent variables of DBH and height in Populus deltoides plantation, case study: West, Center and East of Gilan Province, Iran. Pp. 14–14. https://doi.org/10.61326/icelis.2023.7
Abedi, T., Limaei, S.M., Bonyad, A.E. and Torkaman, J., 2022. Determination of net present value of carbon sequestration in Populus deltoides plantation. Environ. Res., 12(24): 269-279.
Abedi, T., Abedi, R., Modaberi, H. and Pourbabaei, H., 2023. Investigation of carbon sequestration model according to independent variables of DBH and height in Populus deltoides plantation, case study: West, Center and East of Gilan Province, Iran. Pp. 14–14. https://doi.org/10.61326/icelis.2023.7
Ali, A., 2020. Biomass and carbon tables for major tree species of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar.
Ali, A., Ashraf, M.I., Gulzar, S. and Ahmad, B., 2019. Estimation of soil carbon pools in the forests of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Province, Pakistan. J. For. Res. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-01059-9
Anita, T. and Anubha, S., 2020. Early growth performance of Populus deltoides clones in Prayagraj. Indian J. Plant Sci., 9: 31-35. http://www.cibtech.org/jps.htm.
Arora, G., Chaturvedi, S., Kaushal, R., Nain, A., Tewari, S., Alam, N.M. and Chaturvedi, O.P., 2014. Growth, biomass, carbon stocks, and sequestration in an age series of Populus deltoides plantations in Tarai region of central Himalaya. Turk. J. Agric. For., 38(4): 550–560. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1307-94
Buck, H.J. and Palumbo-Compton, A., 2022. Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: What do farmers think? Biogeochemistry, 161: 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00948-2
Chaturvedi, O.P., Handa, A.K., Kaushal, R., Uthappa, A.R., Sarvade, S. and Panwar, P., 2016. Biomass production and carbon sequestration through agroforestry. Range Mgmt. Agrofor., 37(2): 116–127.
Chavan, S.B. and Dhillon, R.S., 2019. Doubling farmers income through Populus deltoides-based agroforestry systems in northwestern India: An economic analysis. Curr. Sci., 2: 117. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v117/i2/219-226
Chavan, S.B., Dhillon, R.S., Sirohi, C., Keerthika, A., Kumari, S., Bharadwaj, K.K., Jinger, D., Kakade, V., Chichaghare, A.R., Zin El-Abedin, T.K., Mahmoud, E.A., Casini, R., Sharma, H., Elansary, H.O. and Yessoufou, K., 2022. Enhancing farm income through boundary plantation of poplar (Populus deltoides): An economic analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148663
COP. 2016. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/net-zero-coalition
Dhakal, A. and Rai, R.K., 2020. Who adopts agroforestry in a subsistence economy? Lessons from the Terai of Nepal. Forests, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050565
Dipesh, K.C., Blazier, M.A., Pelkki, M.H. and Liechty, H.O., 2017. Genotype influences survival and growth of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides L.) managed as a bioenergy feedstock on retired agricultural sites of the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. New For., 48(1): 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-016-9558-0
Dixon, M.D., Johnson, W.C., Scott, M.L., Bowen, D.E. and Rabbe, L.A., 2012. Dynamics of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides) forests and historical landscape change along unchanneled segments of the Missouri River, USA. Environ. Manage., 49(5): 990–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9842-5
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization), 2017. Soil organic carbon: The hidden potential. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. pp. 90.
Fuertes, A.N., Cañellas, I., Sixto H. and Rodríguez-Soalleiro, R., 2021. An economic overview of Populus spp. in short rotation coppice systems under Mediterranean conditions: An assessment tool for decision-making. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev., 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111577
Ghale, B., Mitra, E. and Sodhi, H.S., 2022. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems and its potential in climate change mitigation. Water Air Soil Pollut., 1: 228-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05689-4
Glover, E.K., Hassan, B.A., Ahmed, H.B. and Glover, M.K., 2013. Analysis of socio-economic conditions influencing adoption of agroforestry practices academy of Finland view project analysis of socio-economic conditions influencing adoption of agroforestry practices. Int. J. Agric. For., 4: 178–184.
Harinder, S. and Murthy, H.K., 2016. Economic analysis of poplar based agroforestry system under riparian wet land conditions of Punjab. Indian J. Econ. Dev., 12(1): 191-196. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2016.00023.8
Hendri, Rahmadaniarti, A. and Mahatmandira, G.A., 2023. Optimization agroforestry to address green economy and climate change in Manokwari Regency, West Papua. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 1: 112-118. https://www.nzpcn.org.nz/flora/species/populus-deltoides. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1192/1/012038
Himshikha and Charan, S., 2018. Comparison of economics of poplar-fodder crop-based agroforestry under boundary and block plantation in Haridwar, North India. Indian J. Econ. Dev., 14(1): 422-426. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2018.00091.4
Hudson, J.M., Ghereni, S.A. and Goldstein, R.A., 1994. Modelling the global carbon cycle: Nitrogen fertilization of the terrestrial biosphere and the missing CO2 sink. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles, 8: 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GB01044
Intergrovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2000. Land use, landus change and Forestry. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, p. 375.
Irshad, M., Khan, A., Inoue, M., Ashraf, M. and Sher, H., 2011. Identifying factors affecting agroforestry system in Swat, Pakistan. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 6(11): 2586–2593.
Jain, S.K. and Singh, P., 2000. Economic analysis of industrial agroforestry: Poplar (Populus deltoides) in Uttar Pradesh (India). Agrofor. Syst., 49(3): 255 273.
Jose, S. and Bardhan, S., 2012. Agroforestry for biomass production and carbon sequestration: An overview. Agrofor. Syst., 86(2): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9573-x
Kanwal, S., Baig, S. and Hashmi, I., 2019. Carbon storage and allocation pattern in plant biomass under drought stress and nitrogen supply in Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Populus deltoids. Pak. J. Bot., 51(5). https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2019-5(14)
Kay, S., Graves, A., Palma, J.H.N., Moreno, G., Roces-Diaz, J.V., Aviron, S., Chouvardas, D., Crous-Duran, J., Ferreiro-Dominguez, N., Garcia de Jalon, S., Macicasan, V., Mosquera-Losada, M.R., Pantera, A., Santiago-Freijanes, J.J., Szerencsits, E., Torralba, M., Burgess, P.J. and Herzog, F., 2019. Agroforestry is paying off – Economic evaluation of ecosystem services in European landscapes with and without agroforestry systems. Ecosyst. Ser., 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100896
Krishnakurnar, N., Palanisamy, K., Maheshwar, H.K., Warrier, C.S. and Krishnanoorthy, M., 2011. Manual of economically important forestry species in South India. Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education), Tamil Nadu.
Kumar, J., and Yadav, R., 2022. Climate change mitigation through agroforestry: Socioeconomic and environmental consequences. Plant stress mitigators: Action and application. pp. 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7759-5_26
Lehmann, L.M., Smith, J., Westaway, S., Pisanelli, A., Russo, G., Borek, R., Sandor, M., Gliga, A., Smith, L. and Ghaley, B.B., 2020. Productivity and economic evaluation of agroforestry systems for sustainable production of food and non-food products. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135429
Mbow, C., Smith, P., Skole, D., Duguma, L. and Bustamante, M., 2014. Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 6(1): 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.002
Murthy, I.K., 2013. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in India. J. Earth Sci. Clim. Change, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000131
Nnko, L.E., 2022. Carbon sequestration in agroforestry technologies as a strategy for climate change mitigation. www.intechopen.com.
Nouman, W., Khan, G.S., Siddiqui, M.T., and Riaz, A. 2008. Farmers’ attitude towards agroforestry in district Faisalabad. Pak. J. Agri. Sci, 45(1), 60-64.
Orwa, C., Mutua, A., Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R. and Anthony, S., 2009. Agroforestry tree database: A tree reference and selection guide. Version 4.0 (http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sites/treedbs/treedatabases.asp).
Pandey, A., Sinha, P.R. and Dhawan, V., 2020. Socio-economic study of poplar (Populus deltoides) based agroforestry model in Vaishali district of Bihar. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 9(1): 1739-1741. http://www.phytojournal.com.
Pankaj, N., Kumar, P.B.D. and Rajender, S., 2016. An economic analysis of poplar plantation in Haryana. Indian J. Econ. Dev., 12(4): 769-774. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2016.00203.1
Pingale, B.N., 2009. Studies on carbon sequestration in poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr. Ex. Marsh) based agroforestry system with varying tree density. M.Sc. Ag (Agroforestry) thesis. GB Pant Univ. Agric. Technol. Pantnagar, 263: 145.
Rani, S., Chauhan, S.K., Kumar, R. and Dhatt, K.K., 2011. Bioeconomic appraisal of flowering annuals for seed production under poplar (Populus deltoides) based agroforestry system. Trop. Agric. Res., 22(2). https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v22i2.2821
Rizvi, R.H., Newaj, R., Chaturvedi, O.P., Prasad, R.A., Handa, K. and Alam,, 2019. Carbon sequestration and CO2 absorption by agroforestry systems: An assessment for Central Plateau and Hill region of India. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 128(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1071-3
Sharma, S., Singh, B. and Sikka, R., 2015. Soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools in a chronosequence of poplar (Populus deltoides) plantations in alluvial soils of Punjab, India. Agrofor. Syst., 89: 1049-1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9834-6
Sharma, R., Sharma, S., and Pathania, A. 2020. Financial analysis of poplar based agroforestry system in low hill zone of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Agrofores., 22(2): 26-30.
Sheikh, M.I., 1993. Trees of Pakistan. First Edition. Pakistan Forest Institute, Peshawar.
Singh, I., 2016. Tree crop interaction in agroforestry system.
Singh, P., and Lodhiyal, L.S., 2009. Biomass and carbon allocation in 8-years old poplar (Populus deltoides Marsh) plantation in Tarai agroforestry systems of central Himalaya, India. N. Y. Sci. J., 2(6). http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork.
Singh, M., and Kaur, M. 2020. An economic analysis of poplar cultivation in Punjab. Economic Affairs, 65(4), 535-542.
Usman, N., Hussain, M., Akram, S., Majeed, M., Rehman, S., Yousaf, F., Shaukat, A., Shah, S., Mishr, S.W.A., Shrestha, R.S., Saddiqa, S., Room, A.S.A. and Ali, A., 2024. Yield, carbon stock, and price dynamics of agroforestry tree species in district Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Braz. J. Biol., 84. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.262662
Yadava, A.K., 2010. Biomass production and carbon sequestration in different agroforestry systems in Tarai region of Central Himalaya. Indian For., 136(2): 234-244.
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?