Response of Sucking Insect Pest Fauna Towards Bt and Non Bt Cotton Genotypes under Varying Climatic Condition
Tamoor Ali1*, Muhammad Hamid Bashir1, Bilal Saeed Khan1, Abdul Ghaffar2, Danish Riaz3, Muhammad Zia ul Haq1, Shoaib Nawaz1, Aneeb Ali1, Iftikhar ul Hassan1, Ikram Ul Haq4, Muhammad Khuram Shahzad1, Usama Saleem5 and Tamsila Nazir2
1Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan; 2Ayub Agriculture Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan; 3Department of Zoology, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan; 4Department of Pest Warning and Quality Control of Pesticides, Punjab, Pakistan; 5Department of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
*Correspondence | Tamoor Ali, Department of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan; Email:
[email protected]
Figure 1:
Relationship between different population of whitefly and cotton germplasm.
Figure 2:
Fluctuation of population of whitefly in different date of observation
Figure 4:
Relationship of whitefly population with abiotic factors in different cotton cultivars
Figure 5:
Relationship between population of thrips and cotton germplasm
Figure 6:
Fluctuation of population of thrips in different date of observations
Figure 7:
Relationship of thrips population with abiotic factors in different cotton cultivars
Figure 8:
Comparison of population dynamics of thrips among varieties of cotton crop
Figure 9:
Relationship between population of jassid and cotton germplasm
Figure 10:
Comparison of population dynamics of jassid among varieties of cotton
Figure 11:
Fluctuation of population of jassid in different date of observation
Figure 12:
Relationship of jassid population with abiotic factors in CEMB-33
Figure 13:
PCA Figure for environmental variation
Figure 14:
Yield data of different cotton varities with responce of sucking insct pests.
Figure 3:
Comparison of population dynamics of whitefly among varieties of cotton crop.