Novel EST-SNPs Polymorphisms and their Association with Growth Traits in Schizothorax prenanti
Novel EST-SNPs Polymorphisms and their Association with Growth Traits in Schizothorax prenanti
Yuejing Yang1,2, Mengbin Xiang1,2, Zhengshi Zhang3, Minrui Zhou1, Bingjie Hu1, Tingsen Jing1, Zhe Li1, Fenglin Liu1, Hui Luo1, Qinglu Li1* and Hua Ye1*
1Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development (Ministry of Education), Southwest University, College of Fisheries,, Chongqing 400715, China
2Fisheries Research Institute in Wanzhou Chongqing, Chongqing, 404000, China
3State Key Laboratory of Marine Resources Utilization, South China Sea (Ministry of Education), Hainan University, College of Ocean , Haikou 570100, China
ABSTRACT
Schizothorax prenanti (S. prenanti), an economic fish in China, has rich nutritional value and high economical value. In order to acquire some reliable molecular genetic markers for growth traits, correlation analysis between 31 SNP markers and growth traits in S. prenanti was analyzed using 164 samples with the same growth conditions. Principal component analysis showed that the body weight accounted for 94.50% of the variance, the eigenvalue was greater than 1, and the accumulative variance was more than 85%. So, the body weight was the first principal component of the growth traits for S. prenanti. Association analysis indicated that ug25066-1502 had significantly associated with total length and body weight; and ug22539-1605 and total length, body length, body height, and body weight were significantly associated. In conclusion, ug25066-1502 and ug22539-1605 were significantly associated with the growth traits, which could be used as important candidate molecular markers for selective breeding of S. prenanti.
Article Information
Received 05 June 2019
Revised 20 June 2019
Accepted 10 November 2020
Available online 15 June 2022
(early access)
Published 19 January 2023
Authors’ Contribution
HY, QL and HL conceived the idea and designed the experiments. TJ, ZL and FL fed the fishes. ZSZ and MZ performed the experiment. YY, MX and BH analysed the data. YY, HY and QL wrote the manuscript and drafted the article.
Key words
Schizothorax prenanti, EST-SNP, Growth traits, Correlation analysis, Marker-assisted breeding
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20190605130648
* Corresponding authors: [email protected]; [email protected]
0030-9923/2023/0002-927 $ 9.00/0
Copyright 2023 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
With the development of genomics technology, it is likely that productivity and commercial value could be improved when genomic methods are applied to select superior parents. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is a powerful method to improve and develop high-quality strains. Compared with traditional methods used in animals, MAS accelerates genetic improvement and the achievement of breeding goals (De-Santis, 2007). It is not affected by the external environment and age stages, which can also use genetic markers for early selection to shorten generational intervals and increase selection intensity (Lu and Wu, 2002).
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) describes polymorphisms caused by point mutations that give rise to different alleles containing alternative bases at a given nucleotide position within a locus (Liu and Cordes, 2004). SNPs have been widely exploited in molecular marker development and genome mapping due to their high abundance, genotyping efficiency, data quality, and genome-wide coverage (Emahazion et al., 1999; Liu and Cordes, 2004; Wang et al., 1998). Moreover, SNPs developed from ESTs are type I markers, which have the advantages of good versatility, clear bands, and analytical simplicity. SNPs from candidate genes are becoming important and efficient molecular markers for MAS (Spelman et al., 1999). In recent years, SNP markers associated with important traits have been reported in animal and plant, especially growth trait. In aquatic animals, SNP markers associated with growth traits have been reported in Chlamys farreri (Guo et al., 2012), Pelteobagrus fulvidraco (Li et al., 2016), Crassostrea gigas (Cong et al., 2013; Cong et al., 2014), Micrpterus salmoides (Li et al., 2012), Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Thanh et al., 2010), Siniperca chuatsiand (Dong et al., 2019) and so on.
Schizothorax prenanti, one of the indigenous economic fish species in China, mainly distributed in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and its tributaries with rich nutritional value is of high economic value (Chen and Cao, 2000; Wu and Wu, 1992). With the increase in artificial breeding intensification, the germplasm resources of S. prenanti have been degraded, which is revealed in individual miniaturization, slow growth, and decreased disease resistance (Luo et al., 2016; Ye et al., 2018). Therefore, there is an obvious need for more molecular markers associated with growth traits for intensive study on the molecular marker-assisted breeding. Although the SNP of S. prenanti have been developed in recent years (Luo et al., 2016), the genetic molecular markers associated with growth traits remain scarce.
In this study, 31 novel EST-SNP markers were analyzed their polymorphism using Mass ARRAY® MALDI-TOF System. To provide valuable information in molecular assisted breeding and genetic improvement for S. prenanti, we explored associations between SNP markers and growth traits in the cultured populations of S. prenanti.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection, genomic DNA preparation and commercial traits measurement
The experimental protocols were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of Southwest University. A total of 164 individuals were randomly selected from a cultured population in E Meishan, (Sichuan Province, China) in July 2017. The samples were bred in the same batch and pond. Fishes were anesthetized using tricaine meth-anesulfonate (MS222). Then Total length (TL), body length (BL) and body height (BH) were measured by Vernier Caliper (0.1 mm accuracy). Body weight (BW) was weighed using an electronic balance (0.1 g accuracy). After obtaining the measurement data, fins were cut and preserved in 95% alcohol, and genomic DNAs were extracted using Animal genomic DNA extraction kit (Sangon biotech, Shang Hai, China). DNA was examined by performing 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and concentrations were determined using photometry (Eppendorf, German). The working DNA concentration was 30 ng/uL.
Polymorphism SNP loci screening and SNP genotyping
EST-SNP sequences were obtained from transcriptome of Spleen in S. prenanti in our previous research (Luo et al., 2016). Based on EST-SNP sequence information, primers were designed (Table I). PCR was performed in a 10 uL reaction volume, containing 1.25 uL 10×PCR Buffer with 15 mM MgCl2, 0.65 uL 25 mM MgCl2, 2 uL dNTP (2.5 mM), 2 uL forward primer (0.5 uM), 2 uL reverse primer (0.5 uM), 0.2 uL ExTaq DNA polymerase (5 U/ uL) (TaKaRa), using 2 uL genome DNA as template, adding 1.9 uL ddH2O. PCR profiles included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 15 min, 94°C denaturation for 20 s, annealing temperature 56 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 60 s for 45 cycles and a final extension at 72 °C for 3 min. SNP sequence-specific extension primers were added to the PCR-amplified product and a base was extended at the SNP site. The extended product was purified and co-crystallized with a MassARRAY® SpectroCHIP chip with a surface-covered substrate, and the crystals were placed in a vacuum tube of a mass spectrometer to automatically analyze the SNPs site information.
Data analysis
Observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He) and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for SNP loci were calculated using POPGENE version 32 software (Yeh and Boyle, 2000). Polymorphic information content (PIC) was calculated by PIC-CALC software.
Morphological analysis was performed with SPSS 19.0. Multivariate analysis of variance and independent-samples T test in the general linear model (GLM) were used to analyze the association between SNP locus and growth traits. Significant differences were tested using Duncan’s multiple range test. Differences were considered to be statistically significant when p < 0.05 or p<0.01.
RESULTS
Morphological analysis
The descriptive statistics including mean, skewness, kurtosis, minimum and maximum for the growth traits were summarized in Table II. Skewness and kurtosis are parameters to test normal distribution. Skewness test and kurtosis test both indicated the four traits (BW, TL, BL and BH) obeyed normal distribution (p>0.05) (West et al., 1995).
Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between the traits (p<0.01) (Table III). Maximum correlation coefficient was 0.982 between BL and TL. Minimum correlation coefficient was 0.887 between TL and BH.
Principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that body weight accounting for 94.50% of the variance, the eigenvalue more than 1, the accumulative variance more than 85%, it was the first principal component of the growth traits of S. prenanti (Table IV).
Point mutations of SNP included transitions and transversions. Among the 31 SNP markers, the number of transitions and transversions was respectively 18 and 13, and the ratio between them was approximately 1.38. 23 loci were polymorphic and the proportion was 74.2%. Genetic parameters of 23 SNPs are shown in Table V. The observed heterozygosity (Ho) ranged from 0.0854 to 0.3476, while the expected heterozygosity (He) ranged from 0.0820 to 0.3471, with the average values of 0.2094 and 0.2019, respectively. PIC value ranged from 0.0121 to0.3750 with an average of 0.2270. In addition, 13 loci had moderate polymorphism (0.25≤PIC<0.5) (Botstein et al., 1980). While the remained 10 loci had low polymorphism (PIC<0.25). 13 of the 23 SNPs were in accordance with HWE (p>0.05).
Table I. The primer information of 31 EST- SNPs in S. prenanti.
Locus |
Mutation |
Sequence (5' to 3') |
ug25066-1464 |
C-T |
F:CCTCAGCTTTCAGGGTAAAC |
R:TCCCATCCTAACCAGTACTC |
||
ug23056-2291 |
C-T |
F:TCTGTAACACCCCAAATGCC |
R:AAGGTGTCATATCCTTGCAG |
||
ug25066-2545 |
T-C |
F:AACCCTTTGTGTGGTGTCTG |
R:TGTGCCAGACTGAAGGTTTC |
||
ug22539-1613 |
A-G |
F:TCATCGTCTTAAAGAACTG |
R:ATGGGCATGTTGTTCCTCAC |
||
ug23056-1182 |
T-C |
F:ATCCCTGGAGCATAACTCAC |
R:GCAGGTTAAGCTGTCTAAGG |
||
ug23056-1969 |
G-A |
F:GATTACCACGGAGACTTAGC |
R:CTGGATCTGGATTACAATGG |
||
ug22539-1718 |
C-T |
F:TTTCTGACTCTGAAATGCAC |
R:GAAATGGAATATATCCCATGC |
||
ug25066-1003 |
G-T |
F:TTTGATGCAATCACCGGCAC |
R:ACCAAAAGAACTGCCCATGC |
||
ug22539-1428 |
T-G |
F:CCCTATCTCTGAGTTTCGAC |
R:TTTGAAGGACTGCTGTTCCC |
||
ug23056-2461 |
T-A |
F:TGTCTTCAGTACTGTGGATG |
R:ATGGTAAACCGTATGCTGGG |
||
ug22539-1359 |
G-A |
F:CTATAGGACCATTTGATGGAC |
R:GTATCCCATACCTACAACCC |
||
ug23056-1317 |
C-A |
F:AATCCAGTGTCTTCAGGTGC |
R:GAGCATCTATGCATGGCAAA |
||
ug23056-2066 |
T-G |
F:TGTGACACGTTGGACAGATG |
R:GCTGCATGCCTCTGTTTTTG |
||
ug23056-2976 |
T-C |
F:CTTCTACCAACAGGGTCAAC |
R:CGGACATACCAAATAAGGAC |
||
ug25066-703 |
G-A |
F:GGTGTCTCTAGAGATGCTTG |
R:GATCCAGCACATGGAATCTC |
||
ug25066-1502 |
G-C |
F:CGGACATGTTCTTAAATGGG |
R:TTTCACGCTTCTGACCCTTG |
||
Locus |
Mutation |
Sequence (5' to 3') |
ug23056-2381 |
T-C |
F:TGACACCTTTTAAGGCACTG |
R:GGATTCTCCATCCTTGGAAG |
||
ug23056-1955 |
A-G |
F:ATGTAACTCAGAGAAGCCGC |
R:CCTCAAGGATGCCACAAAAC |
||
ug25066-2515 |
T-A |
F:CCAACCATCCTTCAGGAAAC |
R:GACCATCTTACCAACATGCG |
||
ug25066-779 |
C-T |
F:AGGGTCAGAAGCGTGAAATG |
R:TTCCATGTGCTGGATCTCTC |
||
ug22539-1605 |
C-A |
F:GAACTGTATTTAGGCCCCAC |
R:ATGGGCATGTTGTTCCTCAC |
||
ug23056-1165 |
A-T |
F:ATCCCTGGAGCATAACTCAC |
R:GCAGGTTAAGCTGTCTAAGG |
||
ug25066-2587 |
A-C |
F:GTATGTTCCCTACAACCAGC |
R:AGAAACCTTCAGTCTGGCAC |
||
ug225391-831 |
C-T |
F:ATCAGAGCTTGGTGAGAAGG |
R:TTGCTCTTGCTCCCAGACAG |
||
ug22539-400 |
T-C |
F:CAAACTCAAAGCGACACCAG |
R:GAAGGAATAATGGGCAGTCG |
||
ug23056-2938 |
G-T |
F:CGGACATACCAAATAAGGAC |
R:CTTCTACCAACAGGGTCAAC |
||
ug22539-817 |
C-T |
F:TTGCTCTTGCTCCCAGACAG |
R:ATCAGAGCTTGGTGAGAAGG |
||
ug22539-387 |
T-G |
F:GAAGGAATAATGGGCAGTCG |
R:CAAACTCAAAGCGACACCAG |
||
ug22539-551 |
C-A |
F:CGTTCTCCAGATTCTCCATC |
R:CTGGTCGACAAGAATGTTCC |
||
ug25066-2659 |
G-A |
F:TATAAGTCCTGGCTGTCGTC |
R:CATACCGCAGTACAGGTTAC |
||
ug25066-1540 |
C-T |
F:AGTACTGGTTAGGATGGGAC |
R:AGCTGTTTCCAGATAGGTCC |
Table II. Descriptive statistics for the growth traits.
Growth traits |
Mean ±standard deviation |
Skewness |
Kurtosis |
Minimum |
Maximum |
P |
Body weight /g |
72.74±30.43 |
0.62 |
-0.17 |
18 |
158 |
0.168 |
Total length/cm |
19.76±2.72 |
-0.05 |
-0.47 |
12.4 |
26 |
0.697 |
Body length/cm |
16.40±2.4 |
0.1 |
-0.27 |
10.1 |
23.1 |
0.615 |
Body height/cm |
3.53±0.55 |
0.42 |
0.06 |
2.1 |
5.2 |
0.054 |
Table III. Correlation coefficients of body weight, total length, body length, body heigh.
Growth traits |
Body weight |
Total length |
Body length |
Body height |
Body weight |
1 |
0.939** |
0.951** |
0.910** |
Total length |
1 |
0.982** |
0.887** |
|
Body length |
1 |
0.889** |
||
Body height |
1 |
Table IV. Principle component analysis on growth traits of S.prenanti.
Component |
Initial of component |
Sum of squares of extracted component |
||||
Total |
Variance ratio |
Accumulation variance ratio |
Total |
Variance ratio |
Accumulation variance ratio |
|
Body weight |
3.78 |
94.50 |
94.50 |
3.78 |
94.50 |
94.50 |
Total length |
0.14 |
4.67 |
98.06 |
|||
Body length |
0.06 |
1.51 |
99.57 |
|||
Body height |
0.02 |
0.43 |
100.00 |
Table V. Genetic parameters of 23 SNP loci in S. Prenanti.
Locus |
Mutation |
Ho |
He |
PHWE |
PIC |
ug22539-1613 |
A-G |
0.2744 |
0.3188 |
0.0727 |
0.2673 |
ug22539-1718 |
C-T |
0.0183 |
0.0182 |
0.9232 |
0.0179 |
ug23056-1182 |
T-C |
0.1646 |
0.1912 |
0.0712 |
0.1725 |
ug23056-1317 |
C-A |
0.1768 |
0.1617 |
0.2229 |
0.1482 |
ug23056-2066 |
T-G |
0.3963 |
0.5015 |
0.0071 |
0.3750 |
ug23056-2976 |
T-C |
0.1951 |
0.1766 |
0.1736 |
0.1606 |
ug25066-2545 |
T-C |
0.2805 |
0.3151 |
0.1572 |
0.2648 |
ug22539-1359 |
G-A |
0.3049 |
0.4102 |
0.001 |
0.3253 |
ug22539-1428 |
T-G |
0.6951 |
0.4997 |
0.0000 |
0.3741 |
ug23056-1969 |
G-A |
0.6103 |
0.4256 |
0.0000 |
0.3341 |
ug23056-2291 |
C-T |
0.4146 |
0.3297 |
0.0009 |
0.2746 |
ug23056-2461 |
T-A |
0.6829 |
0.4511 |
0.0000 |
0.3486 |
ug25066-1003 |
G-T |
0.5915 |
0.4178 |
0.0000 |
0.3298 |
ug25066-1464 |
C-T |
0.9207 |
0.4984 |
0.0000 |
0.3734 |
ug22539-1605 |
C-A |
0.0854 |
0.0820 |
0.5827 |
0.0784 |
ug23056-1165 |
A-T |
0.1951 |
0.2240 |
0.0953 |
0.1983 |
ug23056-1955 |
A-G |
0.1890 |
0.2285 |
0.0253 |
0.2019 |
ug23056-2381 |
T-C |
0.3476 |
0.3471 |
0.9868 |
0.2862 |
ug25066-2515 |
T-A |
0.0122 |
0.0122 |
0.9558 |
0.0121 |
ug25066-2587 |
A-C |
0.0305 |
0.0301 |
0.8595 |
0.029 |
ug25066-703 |
G-A |
0.2317 |
0.3700 |
0.0000 |
0.3008 |
ug25066-779 |
C-T |
0.0675 |
0.0654 |
0.6712 |
0.063 |
ug25066-1502 |
G-C |
0.3476 |
0.3471 |
0.9868 |
0.2862 |
Mean |
0.3145 |
0.2792 |
0.2270 |
observed heterozygosity= (Ho), expected heterozygosity= (He), polymorphic information content = (PIC), Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium= (HWE).
Associations between EST-SNPs and growth traits
The results of multivariate analysis of variance in the general linear model indicated that CC genotype at ug25066-1502 had significantly higher values for BW and TL than did individuals with the GG genotype (p<0.05), and CC genotype had significantly greater values for BW than CG genotype (p<0.05). For ug23056-2976, TT genotype was significantly lower than CT genotype for BH (P<0.05). Moreover, compared with CC genotype, individuals with the AC genotype at ug22539-1605 had significantly higher value in TL, BL, BH, and BW (p<0.05) (Table VI). Further analysed, the allele C was significantly higher than allele A in TL, BL and BH (Table VII) (p<0.05).
Principal component analysis is a dimension reduction technique that used to describe the relations between several response variables and explain the total variation in the data (Abbas and Wasin., 2019). To date, PCA has been widely used in aquatic area, such as aquatic ecosystem (Uddameri et al., 2014), aquatic nutrition (Casu et al., 2017; Gammanpila et al., 2017), morphological analysis (Jiang et al., 2012; Li et al., 2015). It is useful when the variables under study are highly correlated. In our study, the correlation analysis showed that four traits (BW, TL, BL and BH) have an extremely significant relationship. What is more, the result of PCA showed that BW is the first principal component of the growth traits of S. prenanti. Therefore, body weight is a main indicator in selective breeding of S. prenanti. Furthermore, TL, BH and BL could be indirect indicators to reflect the growth.
Table VI. Correlation analysis between genotypes of SNPs and growth traits in S. prenanti.
Locus |
Genotype |
Number |
Body weight (g) |
Body height (cm) |
Total length (cm) |
Body length (cm) |
ug25066-1502 |
GG |
99 |
75.26±30.37a |
3.59±0.54a |
20.00±2.69a |
16.62±2.39a |
CG |
57 |
67.07±30.12a |
3.40±0.56a |
19.16±2.73ab |
15.87±2.35a |
|
CC |
8 |
81.94±30.85b |
3.64±0.57a |
20.99±2.37b |
17.39±2.23a |
|
ug23056-2976 |
TT |
132 |
70.73±29.22a |
3.48±0.53a |
19.59±2.66a |
16.24±2.34a |
CT |
32 |
81.00±34.26a |
3.71±0.62b |
20.45±2.87a |
17.03±2.56a |
|
ug22539-1605 |
CC |
150 |
74.13±30.97aA |
3.54±0.57a |
19.88±2.77aA |
16.52±2.44aA |
AC |
14 |
57.8±18.86bB |
3.32±0.31b |
18.43±1.50bB |
15.08±1.34bB |
Note: The different superscript lowercase letters within the same column mean significantly difference at 0.05 level, and the different capital letters mean significantly difference at 0.01 level.
Table VII. Correlation analysis between alleles of SNP and growth traits.
Locus |
Allele |
Number |
Body weight (g) |
Body height (cm) |
Total length (cm) |
Body length (cm) |
ug22539-1605 |
C |
164 |
72.74±30.43 |
3.53±0.55a |
19.76±2.72Aa |
16.40±2.40Aa |
A |
14 |
57.8±18.86 |
3.32±0.31b |
18.43±1.50Bb |
15.08±1.34Bb |
Note: The different superscript lowercase letters within the same column mean significantly difference at 0.05 level, and the different capital letters mean significantly difference at 0.01 level.
Abundant SNPs discovered by the next generation sequencing technologies have allowed us to better understand the association between genomic variation and production traits in aquatic species (Yáñez et al., 2014). In this study, we identified 31 genomic SNP loci from the unigene data of the transcriptome. The ratio between conversion and transversion was 1.38, similar to turbot (1.35) (Vera et al., 2013), lower than lake sturgeon (1.65) (Hale et al., 2009), which is related to the differences of the species’ own genome and living environment. The ratio between conversion and transversion in point mutations has a great influence on the degree of gene selection pressure and reflected deviation of mutation. Besides, the data of genotyping of SNP in 164 S. prenanti showed 23 loci were polymorphic accounting for 74.2%, which was lower than previous research in S. prenanti (Luo et al., 2016) and higher than Mauremys mutica (Zhao et al., 2016) and large yellow croaker (Jiang et al., 2015).
Heterozygosity could measure the genetic variability; He>5 indicated that the population experiences low selection and maintains higher genetic diversity (Jiang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2019). Our data suggested that the mean value of observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity were respectively 0.2094 and 0.2019, which indicated the population has low genetic diversity. After calculating the PIC in the population, 13 loci were found to have moderate polymorphism (0.25≤PIC<0.5), whereas others were low polymorphism (PIC<0.25). PIC demonstrates the degree of DNA variation, the value of which is dependent on the number of alleles and their frequency distribution. If the number of alleles was greater and the allelic frequencies of all alleles were more balanced, the PIC will be greater (nearly 1) (Li et al., 2012). Low genetic parameters could be attributed to the fact that the SNP only has two alleles, allelic imbalance, and the samples from cultured population and the population’s genetic diversity were low.
If there is a significant association between markers and specific trait in a population, correlation analysis can figure out that which marker is associated with that trait (Doerge, 2002; Lynch and Walsh, 1997). This association has already reached the significant level, which may suggest the relationships between the marker and the trait. Consequently, the selective breeding inferred from phenotype can operate to genotype-assisted selection. In this study, we found that CC genotype at ug25066-1502 was significantly superior than GC genotype and GG genotype with higher BH, which demonstrates that ug25066-1502 was correlated with BH. However, only BL in the CC genotype was significantly superior than the GG genotype, while no significant difference was observed between GG and GC genotype. Therefore, these data imply that ug23056-2976 may have some effects on TL, but the effects are not major. Apart from these, at ug23056-2976 and ug22539-1605, we only detected two genotypes. The results imply that the CC at ug23056-2976 and AA at ug22539-1605 are rare genotypes. Or we need additional work to utilize larger samples for further confirmation. For ug22539-1605, the CC genotype was significantly correlated with the four traits. In our analysis, we found that the allelic genotype C was significantly higher than allele A in TL, BL and BH. So, the allelic genotype C may be had a major impact on growth traits.
CONCLUSIONS
In our study, principal component analysis indicated that body weight was the first principal component of the growth traits of S. prenanti. And we found that ug25066-1502 was correlated with BH and ug22539-1605 was significantly correlated with the four traits. The two loci could be used as important candidate molecular markers for selective breeding of S. prenanti.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the central Universities (XDJK2017B008, XDJK2015C034), scientific research initiation project aided by special fund, Southwest university Rongchang campus (20700208), and the Youth Foundation of Southwest University Rongchang Campus (20700937, 20700938), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31402302).
Conflict of interest declaration
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
Abbas, F.M.A. and Wasin, A.A.A.A., 2019. Chapter 8 - principal components analysis. Easy Statistics for Food Science with R. Academic Press. pp. 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814262-2.00008-X
Botstein, D., White, R.L., Skolnick, M. and Davis, R.W., 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 32: 314-331.
Casu, F., Watson, A.M., Yost, J., Leffler, J.W., Gaylord, T.G., Barrows, F.T., Sandifer, P.A., Denson, M.R. and Bearden, D.W., 2017. Metabolomics analysis of effects of commercial soy-based protein products in red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus). J. Proteome. Res., 16: 2481-2494. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00074
Chen, Y.F. and Cao, W.X., 2000. Schizothoracinae. Science press. Beijing, China. pp. 273-390.
Cong, R., Li, Q. and Kong, L., 2013. Polymorphism in the insulin-related peptide gene and its association with growth traits in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 46: 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2012.09.008
Cong, R., Kong, L., Yu, H. and Li, Q., 2014. Association between polymorphism in the insulin receptor-related receptor gene and growth traits in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 54: 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2014.02.003
De-Santis, C. and Jerry, D.R., 2007. Candidate growth genes in finfish. Where should we be looking? Aquaculture, 272: 0-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.08.036
Doerge, R.W., 2002. Multifactorial geneticsmapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations. Nat. Rev. Genet., 3: 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg703
Dong J.J., Chen Z.H., Cheng F.S, Tian, Y.Y., Hu, J., Lu, M. and Ye, X., 2019. Cloning, SNP detection, and growth correlation analysis of the 5′ flanking regions of two myosin heavy chain-7 genes in Mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. mol. Biol., 228: 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2018.10.006
Emahazion T., Jobs, M., Howell, W.M., Siegfried, M., Wyöni, P., Prince J.A. and Brookes, A.J., 1999. Identifcation of 167 polymorphisms in 88 genes from candidate neurodegeneration pathways. Gene, 238: 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00330-3
Gammanpila, M., Amarasinghe, U.S. and Wijeyaratne, M.J.S., 2017. Morphological correlates with diet of fish assemblages in brush park fisheries of tropical estuaries. Environ. Biol. Fish., 1: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-017-0642-x
Hale, M.C., Mccormick, C.R., Jackson, J.R. and Dewoody, J.A., 2009. Next-generation pyrosequencing of gonad transcriptomes in the polyploid lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens): The relative merits of normalization and rarefaction in gene discovery. BMC Genomics, 10: 203. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-203
Guo, H.H., Bao Z.M., Li, J., Wang, S.S., He, Y., Fu, X., Zhang, L. and Hu, X., 2012. Molecular characterization of tgf-β type i receptor gene (tgfbr1) in Chlamys farreri, and the association of allelic variants with growth traits. PLoS One, 7: e51005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051005
Jiang, L., Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Zhu, A., Wu, C., Liu, L., Lin, Z. and Dong, Y., 2015. Population structure of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) revealed by single nucleotide polymorphisms. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 63: 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2015.09.025
Jiang, W., Heok Hee, N.G., Yang, J. and Chen, X., 2012. A taxonomic review of the catfish identified as Glyptothorax zanaensis (Teleostei: Siluriformes: Sisoridae), with the descriptions of two new species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. Lond., 165: 363-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00811.x
Li, M.J., Liu, W.S., Luo, W., Zhang, X.Q., Zhu, W.L., Wang, J., Liao, L.Y. and Li, G.H., 2016. Polymorphisms and their association with growth traits in the growth hormone gene of yellow catfish, Pelteobagrus fulvidraco. Aquaculture, 469: S0044848616310109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.11.028
Li, X., Bai, J., Hu, Y., Ye, X., Li, S. and Yu, L., 2012. Genotypes, haplotypes and diplotypes of - SNPs and their association with growth traits in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Mol. Biol. Rep., 39: 4359-4365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1223-2
Li, Z., Liang, H.W., Luo, X.Z., Pan, G.B. and Zou, G.W., 2015. A consecutive self-proliferate silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) variety created through artificial meiotic gynogenesis. Aquaculture, 437: 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.11.007
Liu, Z.J. and Cordes, J.F., 2004. DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquaculture, 238: 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.05.027
Lu, S.X. and Wu, C.X., 2002. Research and application of animal genetic marker assisted selection. Hereditas (Beijing), 24: 359-362.
Luo, H., Ye, H., Xiao, S., He, W., Zheng, S. and Wang, X., 2016. Development of snp markers associated with immune-related genes of Schizothorax prenanti. Conserv. Genet. Resour., 8: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-016-0539-6
Luo, H., Xiao, S., Ye, H., Zhang, Z., Lv, C., Zheng, S., Wang, Z.Y. and Wang, X.Q., 2016. Identification of immune-related genes and development of SSR/SNP markers from the spleen transcriptome of Schizothorax prenanti. PLoS One, 11: e0152572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152572
Lynch, M. and Walsh, B., 1997. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 980.
Spelman, R.J., Garrick, D.J. and Van Arendonk, J.A.M., 1999. Utilisation of genetic variation by marker assisted selection in commercial dairy cattle populations. Livest. Prod. Sci., 59: 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00003-2
Thanh, N.M., Barnes, A.C., Mather, P.B., Li, Y. and Lyons, R.E., 2010. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the actin and crustacean hyperglycemic hormone genes and their correlation with individual growth performance in the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquaculture, 301: 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.02.001
Uddameri, V., Honnungar, V. and Hernandez, E.A., 2014. Assessment of groundwater water quality in central and southern Gulf Coast aquifer, TX using principal component analysis. Environ. Earth Sci., 71: 2653-2671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2896-8
Vera, M., Jose-Antonio, A., Fernandez, C., Bouza, C., Vilas, R. and Martinez, P., 2013. Development and validation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) markers from two transcriptome 454-runs of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) using high-throughput genotyping. Int. J. mol. Sci., 14: 5694-5711. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14035694
Wang, D.G., Fan, J.B., Siao, C., Berno, A., Young, P., Sapolsky, R., Ghandour, G., Perkins, N., Winchester, E. and Spencer, J., 1998. Large-scale identifcation, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. Science, 280: 1077-1082. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5366.1077
West, S.G., Finch, J.F. and Curran, P.J., 1995. Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In: Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (ed. R.H. Hoyle). pp. 56-75.
Wu, Y.F. and Wu, C.Z., 1992. The qinghai-tibet plateau fish. sichuan publishing house of science and technology. Chengdu, Sichuan, China, pp. 361-365.
Yáñez, J.M., Houston, R.D. and Newman, S., 2014. Genetics and genomics of disease resistance in salmonid species. Front. Genet., 5: 415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00415
Yeh, F., Yang, R. and Boyle, T., 2000. POPGENE 32, Microsoft windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Center. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ye, H., Xiao, S.J., Wang, X.Q., Wang, Z.Y., Zhang, Z.S., Zhu, C.K., Hu, B.J., Lv, C.H., Zheng, S.M. and Luo, H., 2018. Characterization of spleen transcriptome of Schizothorax prenanti during Aeromonas hydrophila infection. Mar. Biotechnol., 20: 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-018-9801-0
Zhang, S.Y., Li, X., Chen, X.H., Pan, J.L., Wang, M.H., Zhong, L.Q., Qin, Q. and Bian, W.J., 2019. Significant associations between prolactin gene polymorphisms and growth traits in the channel catfish (Lctalurus punctatus Rafinesque, 1818) core breeding population. Meta Gene, 19: 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2018.10.006
Zhao, J., Zhang, X.C., Li, W., Chen, K., Zhang, D. and Zhu, X., 2016. SNP discovery and Characterization from transcriptomes of Asian yellow pond turtle, Mauremys mutica. Conserv. Genet. Resour., 8: 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-015-0514-7
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?