Molecular Mechanisms of Photoinhibition in Plants: A Review
Review Article
Molecular Mechanisms of Photoinhibition in Plants: A Review
Muhammad Asim Bhutta1,2*, Amna Bibi2, Nadia Hussain Ahmad2, Sadia Kanwal2, Zarmeena Amjad1, Hafeez ur Rehman3, Umar Farooq3, Muhammad Nouman Khalid4 and Syeda Fiza Nayab5
1Institute of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Muhammad Nawaz Sharif University of Agriculture Multan, Pakistan; 2Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan; 3Cotton Research Station, Sahiwal, Pakistan; 4Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan; 5Sorghum Research Sub-Station, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.
Abstract | Through the process of electron transport along a series of redox processes, sunlight energy is transformed into chemical energy that is then stored during photosynthesis. Photoinhibition is a significant and extremely complex phenomenon, which is basically light-induced damage to the photosynthetic machinery that principally affects the Photosystem II complex and leads to less photosynthetic productivity. A light-independent photosynthetic activity restricts the consumption of electrons produced in the early photoreactions, which appears to be the principal cause of photoinhibition by visible light. There is a chance that excessive photosynthetic electron transport could lead to an overabundance of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Reactive oxygen species such as H2O2 and O2, that develops in photosystem II as a result of exposure to intense light, start to damage electron transfer system components and protein structure. Plants have adapted several protective mechanisms like production of antioxidants, enzymes and carotenoids to face reactive oxygen species and avoid photoinhibition. This article provides overview of molecular mechanisms involved in photoinhibition and its protective elements.
Received | October 05, 2022; Accepted | February 08, 2023; Published | April 17, 2023
*Correspondence | Muhammad Asim Bhutta, Institute of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Muhammad Nawaz Sharif University of Agriculture Multan, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Bhutta, M.A., A. Bibi, N.H. Ahmad, S. Kanwal, Z. Amjad, H. Rehman, U. Farooq, M.N. Khalid and S.F. Nayab. 2023. Molecular mechanisms of photoinhibition in plants: A review. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 39(2): 340-345.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2023/39.2.340.345
Keywords | Molecular mechanisms, Photoinhibition, Plants, Protective elements
Copyright: 2023 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Photoinhibition is the term used to describe the decrease in photosynthetic activity brought on by light. The thylakoid membrane-encased PSII complex catalyses, generating one O2 molecule and four protons for every two H2O molecules oxidized. There are around 20 unique protein subunits, approximately 36 molecules of chlorophyll, and plastoquinone that is bounded to protein, and light-driven electron transfer make up PSII. The reaction center of PSII comprises of D1 and D2 proteins. These proteins contain redox cofactors that are used in electron transport chain. The charge separation that occurs between the pheophytin (Phe) electron acceptor molecule and the excited reaction centre chlorophyll assembly (P680•) is the fundamental factor that drives the light-driven PSII electron shift. The fundamental separated charge radical state (P680+•Phe•) is created by this light-induced event and is subsequently stabilized on both the donor and acceptor sides of PSII. In photosystem II (PSII), charge separation happens in picoseconds, whereas the gradual process is catalyzed by Rubisco in 101 s. Photosynthesis is a complicated mechanism with stages catalyzed in lifetimes spanning picosecond (1012 s) to second time spans. Plastoquinol (PQH2) undergoing oxidation by cytochrome b6f (Cytb6f) between these two points and takes place over a period of milliseconds (103 s) (Tjisu et al., 1998). Photoinhibition decreases photosynthetic efficiency by reduction in scavenging mechanism in response to excess temperature and light (Tjisu et al., 1998).
Recent studies have provided new insights into the molecular mechanisms of photoinhibition in plants (Levin et al., 2021). The role of the thylakoid electron transport chain (ETC) in regulating the redox state of the chloroplast and preventing oxidative stress has been understood (González et al., 2021). The photoprotective pigment zeaxanthin has been found to play a crucial role in dissipating excess light energy and preventing oxidative damage to chlorophyll and other photosynthetic pigments (Bassi and Dall’Osto, 2021; Simkin et al., 2022). Key regulatory pathways involved in the dynamic adjustment of the antenna size of chlorophyll molecules and in the regulation of energy transfer between chlorophyll and other pigments have been identified (Kolodny et al., 2021). The role of chlorophyllases in regulating the levels of chlorophyll and other pigments involved in light harvesting and in the response to oxidative stress has been elucidated (Jahan et al., 2022). New approaches, such as fluorescence imaging, mass spectrometry, and transcriptomics, have allowed for a more complete understanding of the complex molecular processes involved in photoinhibition. These insights have important implications for improving photosynthetic efficiency in crops and mitigating the effects of light stress in plants grown under challenging conditions (Priyadarshan and Priyadarshan, 2019).
The objectives of this review are to provide a comprehensive and current understanding of the topic. The paper will summarize previous findings and conclusions, evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of existing research, synthesize the current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved, discuss the implications for improving photosynthetic efficiency and mitigating light stress, identify areas for future research, and provide a useful resource for researchers and practitioners in the field of plant biology and agriculture.
Photoinhibition caused by UV light
Ultra violet light mainly damages the nucleic acid molecules, enzymes and PSII complex of the photosynthetic organisms as presented in Figure 1 (Shomali et al., 2023). Potential UV-induced damage targets in PSII include tyrosine electron donors, catalytic Mn4Ca clusters for water oxidation, and quinone electron acceptors (Soitamo et al., 2017). High ROS formation occurs mainly under UV-B light spectrum. The most harmful UV range among the three is UV-C, which has a shorter wavelength (200–280 nm). However, solar radiation with a wavelength light with wavelengths below 280 nm is prevented from penetrating the atmosphere and reaching the surface of the earth. UV-C radiation has no physiological significance. When compared to UV-A light, UV-B radiation has a roughly 50% higher harmful efficiency (Zhang et al., 2016).
Visible spectrum of light a causal factor of photodamage
Contrary to the generally held mainstream view, in the context of visible light, the situation is far more complicated, where the Mn4Ca cluster plays a primary role in sensitizing UV-induced photodamage of PSII (400–700 nm). The intricate interaction of photodamage, photoprotection, and healing of injured PSII centers, its equilibrium ensures that the net loss of PSII activity, further complicates the situation (Zavafer et al., 2017).
Receptor side events in photoinhibition
The catalytic Mn4Ca apparatus involved in water oxidation is destructed by photodamage, which do not require the presence of excess excitation and solely depends solely on the visible light (Zavafer et al., 2017). Anaerobiosis decreases the activity on the PSII acceptor site, allowing for the study of light-induced alterations at the acceptor side. The double reduced form of QA can also take place under substantially reducing conditions. This is accompanied by the dissociation of QAH2 from its binding location. Under the availability of oxygen, the synthesis of stable QA• is a crucial stage in the photo inhibitory process, although under physiological circumstances, twofold decrease of QA has presumably low harvest. The inhibition of electron transfers forwardly, a temporary phenomenon in the case of stabilized QA• and a permanent phenomenon in the case of QAH2 creation and release, is the most significant effect of the alterations that arise at the QA and QB position. Through restricted forward electron transit enables the production of the triplet state of excited P680. When 3P680 interacts with molecular oxygen, extremely combative singlet form of oxygen is created, which harms the protein environment and actually inhibits PSII electron transport (Krause, 2019). This inhibition can only be restored by the synthesis of the D1 protein dependent PSII repair (Li et al., 2021).
Triple chl formation in photoinhibition
Carotenoids, which also serve as 1O2 quenchers and protect the Chls in light harvesting systems from 3Chl creation, have been shown to produce 1O2 in isolated LCHII complexes. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that weakly linked Chl pigments play a role in photoinhibition PSII (Orekhova et al., 2021). Additionally, damage of photosystem of PSII with temporarily compromised donor side has been shown to result in the elimination of one Chl in PSII other than P680. In comparison to 3Chl generation, which is not directly regulated by electron transfer reactions, 3P680 formation is affected by transmission of electron events via excitation back pressure. As a result, 3P680 participates in the photoinhibitory process in a dynamic, electron transport-regulated manner. The state of P680+•Pheo• is created after the excitation reaches the PSII reaction centre. Even if 1[P680+•Pheo•] is rapidly stabilized by acceptor and donor side electron transfer mechanisms, may take place during the entire life of the primary radical pair, which can change 1[P680+•Pheo•] to its triplet state (Lingvay et al., 2020).
Donor side events in photoinhibition
When the rate of electron extraction by P680+• exceeds the rate of donation of an electron from the Mn4Ca cluster, which is involved for oxidation of water, tempted PSII inactivation can occur due to illumination circumstances. As a result, there is an increase in long-lasting oxidizing radicals on the PSII donor side quickly inactivate electron transport, resulting in protein damage. The oxidizing complex of water and PSII can be also visible in its sequestered reaction centre particles that do not comprise the Mn4Ca cluster when Mn is artificially inhibited by washing with Tris, NH2OH treatment, or by removing Cl. PSII light sensitivity is caused by single amino acid alterations in the C-terminal region of the D1 protein that partially or totally block the activity of oxygen generation (Nawrocki et al., 2021). Previous research has indicated that PSII electron shift is inhibited by non-interacting processes when subjected to both detectable and short-wavelength UV-B radiation at the same time, both of which have been proven to negatively affect the Mn4Ca cluster. Dissimilar target sites are impacted by the UV-B and visible spectral regions differently in terms of the functionality of PSII reaction centres and oxygen generating activity (Nawrocki et al., 2021).
Mechanisms ensuring protection against photoinhibition
Protective role of carotenoids: An essential component of chloroplast protection is provided by two different forms of Carotenoids are found in thylakoids: (i) a free fraction of Cars that serves as an antioxidant to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) created by LHCs and RC complexes. This free fraction can make up to 15% of the overall Car pool. and (ii) cars that are attached to the apparatus of photosynthesis, where they are in close proximity to chlorophyll molecules. The xanthophyll content of terrestrial plants is very well maintained in terms of both the general composition and location in chloroplast structures, despite the enormous variation produced by evolution. Cars are largely attached to photosynthetic multiplexes and have a consistent distribution among their many parts: The RCs bind -carotene, whereas the LHCs are responsible for the binding of the xanthophylls lutein, violaxanthin, and neoxanthin, as well as zeaxanthin, which accumulates as a result of exposure to high levels of light. A distinctive function for each molecular species is suggested by the maintenance of Car structure and site of binding throughout a diverse collection of plant genus and species (Izuhara et al., 2020).
ROS scavenging
The (3O2) and 3Car ground triplet states are created as a result of the energy transfer from ROS to Car. Although the energy of triplet excitation is effectively transformed into heat and into the ground state (Zavafer et al.,, 2017; Krause, 2019). Neo, which makes up around 15% of all cars, is specifically designed to quench 1O2; in contrast, Viola’s purpose in photoprotection is to scavenge 1O2. Zea, whose scavenging activity is increased and also possesses a 3Chl* quenching activity, is created when Viola is de-epoxidized in EL (de Souza et al., 2017).
Prenylquinols function as 1O2 scavengers. Prenylquinols, including tocopherol and plastoquinols, mediate chemical scavenging by electron transport, as opposed to Cars, which additionally makes scavenging easier by facilitating the transfer of excitation energy (quenching). Within the thylakoid lipid matrix, tocopherols are found in a free state, whereas pigment-protein complexes are mostly responsible for binding to cars. Tocopherol and ascorbate work together in plants; mutants with lower ascorbate content exhibit a corresponding rise in tocopherol (Pinnola and Bassi, 2018). Young leaves that have been exposed to intense light in the Arabidopsis thaliana npq1 mutant have been shown to develop larger levels of -tocopherol. This demonstrates that high quantities of tocopherol can compensate for lower levels of 1O2 detoxification by Zea. Tocopherol and Cars have complementary protective roles in vivo. Instead, compared to WT, the tocopherol-deficient A. thaliana vte1 mutant accumulates more Zea in EL.
Ascorbate (vitamin C), can build up to exceptionally high amount (20-300 mM) during EL adaptation. Violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) requires ascorbate to function properly as a cofactor, a direct quencher of 1O2, O2.-, and OH, and a scavenger of OH through ascorbate peroxidase (Stahl-Rommel et al., 2022). It also serves as an electron donor to PSII (APX). It also functions to regenerate -tocopherol from -tocopheryl radicals. The phenotype of ascorbate-deficient mutants of A. thaliana, also known as vtc, which are extremely sensitive to several different oxidative stresses like ozone, UV light, and others, is one source of in vivo supportive data.
Enzymatic antioxidants
The enzymes glutathione peroxidase, peroxiredoxin, APX, SOD, and CAT (catalase) are examples of enzymatic antioxidants. Every compartment of the subcellular structure contains these enzymes. Typically, an organelle has many enzymes working to neutralize distinct ROS. O2.-, the primary oxidant produced by PSI, is quickly converted to H2O2 by SOD. APX is a major enzyme in the ascorbate-glutathione cycle which operates the H2O2detoxification system in chloroplasts. Ascorbate used by APX as a particular electron donor to convert H2O2 to H2O.In this situation the water-water cycle is crucial to prevent photodamage in PSI. O2.- is the major result of photoreduction of O2.- in PSI in EL, that can then be transformed into H2O2 by SOD, which is an enzymatic process (Guidi et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2018).
Conclusions and Recommendations
The process of photoinhibition in plants, which results in damage to photosystem II (PSII) under high light conditions, has been the subject of extensive research over the past three decades. This research has uncovered several key mechanisms that contribute to photoinhibition, including a lack of electron sinks, photoinactivation of PSII and other cell components, inactivation of the Mn4Ca cluster, and the overall regulation of photoinhibitory damage by the PSII repair cycle. While these processes can occur simultaneously, the spectral dispersion of light can influence their effectiveness. The photodamage caused by Mn in the visible (blue) range has been well-studied, but there are also compelling arguments against the notion that photoinhibition is only caused by the inactivation of the Mn4Ca cluster. Other photodamage mechanisms, such as those mediated by singlet oxygen and reactive oxygen species, also exist and may contribute to photoinhibition in different ways. Despite a lack of direct comparisons of these pathways, it is possible that both the Mn-based mechanism and other mechanisms may occur simultaneously and contribute to photodamage. Overall, the study of the molecular mechanisms of photoinhibition in plants has advanced our understanding of this complex process and highlights the need for continued research in this area.
Novelty Statement
This review article provides an thorough and updated insight towards understanding the molecular mechanism of photoinhibition in plants. It will help the scientific community and students to thoroughly develop their concepts towards photoinhibition and conduct their experiments.
Author’s Contribution
Muhammad Asim Bhutta: Provided technical guidence during research work
Amna Bibi and Zarmeena Amjad: Helped in data analysis
Nadia Hussain Ahmad: Proofread the manuscript.
Sadia Kanwal: Helped in data analysis.
Hafeez UR Rehman, Muhammad Nouman Khalid, Syeda Fiza Nayab and Umar Farooq: Helped in manuscript write-up
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Bassi, R. and L. Dall’Osto. 2021. Dissipation of light energy absorbed in excess: The molecular mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 72: 47-76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-071720-015522
de Souza, A., J.-Z. Wang and K. Dehesh. 2017. Retrograde signals: Integrators of interorganellar communication and orchestrators of plant development. Annu.Rev. Plant Biol. 68: 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041007
González, M.C., F.J. Cejudo, M. Sahrawy and A.J. Serrato. 2021. Current knowledge on mechanisms preventing photosynthesis redox imbalance in plants. Antioxidants (Basel). 10(11): 1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111789
Guidi, L., M. Tattini and M. Landi. 2017. How does chloroplast protect chlorophyll against excessive light. In: Lopes, E.J., L.Q. Zepka and M.I. Queiroz (eds). Chlorophyll, pp. 21-36. https://doi.org/10.5772/67887
Guo, Y., S. Tian, S. Liu, W. Wang and N. Sui. 2018. Energy dissipation and antioxidant enzyme system protect photosystem II of sweet sorghum under drought stress. Photosynthetica, 56(3): 861-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-017-0741-0
Hakala-Yatkin, M., M. Mäntysaari, H. Mattila and E. Tyystjärvi. 2010. Contributions of visible and ultraviolet parts of sunlight to photoinhibition. Plant Cell physiol., 51(10): 1745-1753. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcq133
Izuhara, T., I. Kaihatsu, H. Jimbo, S. Takaichi and Y. Nishiyama. 2020. Elevated levels of specific carotenoids during acclimation to strong light protect the repair of photosystem II in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Front. Plant Sci., 11: 1030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01030
Jahan, M.S., M.M. Hasan, F.S. Alotaibi, N.M. Alabdallah, B.M. Alharbi, K.M. Ramadan, E.S. Bendary, D. Alshehri, D. Jabborova and D.A. Al-Balawi. 2022. Exogenous putrescine increases heat tolerance in tomato seedlings by regulating chlorophyll metabolism and enhancing antioxidant defense efficiency. Plants, 11(8): 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081038
Kolodny, Y., H. Zer, M. Propper, S. Yochelis, Y. Paltiel and N. Keren. 2021. Marine cyanobacteria tune energy transfer efficiency in their light-harvesting antennae by modifying pigment coupling. FEBS Lett., 288(3): 980-994. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15371
Krause, G.H., 2019. The role of oxygen in photoinhibition of photosynthesis. In: Causes of photooxidative stress and amelioration of defense systems in plants. CRC press, pp. 43-76. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351070454-2
Levin, G., S. Kulikovsky, V. Liveanu, B. Eichenbaum, A. Meir, T. Isaacson, Y. Tadmor, N. Adir and G. Schuster. 2021. The desert green algae Chlorella ohadii thrives at excessively high light intensities by exceptionally enhancing the mechanisms that protect photosynthesis from photoinhibition. Plant J., 106(5): 1260-1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15232
Li, D., M. Wang, T. Zhang, X. Chen, C. Li, Y. Liu, M. Brestic, T.H. Chen and X. Yang. 2021. Glycinebetaine mitigated the photoinhibition of photosystem II at high temperature in transgenic tomato plants. Photosynth. Res., 147: 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-020-00810-2
Lingvay, M., P. Akhtar, K. Sebők-Nagy, T. Páli and P.H. Lambrev. 2020. Photobleaching of chlorophyll in light-harvesting complex II increases in lipid environment. Front. Plant Sci., 11: 849. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00849
Nawrocki, W.J., X. Liu, B. Raber, C. Hu, C. De Vitry, D.I. Bennett and R. Croce. 2021. Molecular origins of induction and loss of photoinhibition-related energy dissipation qI. Sci. Adv., 7(52): eabj0055. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj0055
Nawrocki, W.J., X. Liu, B. Raber, C. Hu, C. de Vitry, D.I. Bennett and R. Croce. 2021. The rise and fall of the photoinhibition-related energy dissipation qI. bioRxiv, pp. 434-501. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.10.434601
Orekhova, A., M. Barták, A. Casanova-Katny and J. Hájek. 2021. Resistance of Antarctic moss Sanionia uncinata to photoinhibition: Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis of samples from the western and eastern coasts of the Antarctic Peninsula. Plant Biol., 23(4): 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13270
Pinnola, A. and R. Bassi. 2018. Molecular mechanisms involved in plant photoprotection. Biochem. Soc. Trans.m 46(2): 467-482. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20170307
Priyadarshan, P. and P. Priyadarshan. 2019. Breeding for abiotic stress Adaptation. Plant Breed, 10: 413-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7095-3_19
Shomali, A., S. Aliniaeifard, M. Mohammadian, A. Rastogi, O.V. Lastochkina, T. Li and M. Bosacchi. 2023. Photoinhibition in horticultural crops: An overview of the effect of light quality and signaling in the underlying photoprotection mechanisms. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol., 10: 39-50.
Simkin, A.J., L. Kapoor, C.G.P. Doss, T.A. Hofmann, T. Lawson and S. Ramamoorthy. 2022. The role of photosynthesis related pigments in light harvesting, photoprotection and enhancement of photosynthetic yield in planta. Photosynth. Res., 152(1): 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00892-6
Soitamo, A., V. Havurinne and E. Tyystjärvi. 2017. Photoinhibition in marine picocyanobacteria. Physiol. Plant, 161(1): 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12571
Stahl-Rommel, S., I. Kalra, S. D’Silva, M.M. Hahn, D. Popson, M. Cvetkovska and R.M. Morgan-Kiss. 2022. Cyclic electron flow (CEF) and ascorbate pathway activity provide constitutive photoprotection for the photopsychrophile, Chlamydomonas sp. UWO 241 (renamed Chlamydomonas priscuii). Photosynth. Res., pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00877-5
Tjus, S.E., B.L. Møller and H.V. Scheller. 1998. Photosystem I is an early target of photoinhibition in barley illuminated at chilling temperatures. Plant Physiol., 116: 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.2.755
Zavafer, A., W. Koinuma, W.S. Chow, M.H. Cheah and H. Mino. 2017. Mechanism of photodamage of the oxygen evolving Mn cluster of photosystem II by excessive light energy. Sci. Rep., 7(1): 7604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07671-1
Zhang, Z.S., L.Q. Jin, Y.T. Li, M. Tikkanen, Q.M. Li, X.Z. Ai and H.Y. Gao. 2016. Ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B) relieves chilling light induced PSI photoinhibition and accelerates the recovery of CO2 assimilation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) leaves. Sci. Rep., 6(1): 34455. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34455
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?