Management of Callosobruchus chinensis L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Stored Chickpea Grains by using Entomopathogenic Fungi
Mohsin Iqbal1, Farid Asif Shaheen1*, Farah Naz2, Muhammad Usman Raja2, Muhammad Fiaz3 and Muhammad Nadeem1
1Department of Entomology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 46300; 2Department of Plant Pathology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 46300; 3Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, PMAS, Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 46300.
[email protected]
Figure 1
Modeling trend for mean number of eggs laid by pulse beetle in response to different concentrations of B. bassiana.
Figure 2
Modeling trend for mean number of eggs laid by pulse beetle in response to different concentrations of M. anisopliae.
Figure 3
Modeling trend for mean number of holes made by C. chinensis in response to different concentrations of B. bassiana.
Figure 4
Modeling trend for mean number of holes made by C. chinensis in response to different concentrations of M. anisopliae.
Figure 5
Modeling trend for emergence of F1 adults of pulse beetle in response to different concentrations of B. bassiana.
Figure 6
Modeling trend for emergence of F1 adults of pulse beetle in response to different concentrations of M. anisopliae.
Figure 7
Percent inhibition rate (Mean ± SE) of pulse beetle in stored chickpea treated with different concentrations of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae.
Figure 8
Modeling trend of percent inhibition rate (Mean ± SE) of pulse beetle in stored chickpea treated with different concentrations of B. bassiana.
Figure 9
Modeling trend of percent inhibition rate (Mean ± SE) of pulse beetle in stored chickpea treated with different concentrations of M. anisopliae.
Figure 10
Modeling trend of days to 100% mortality of F1 adults (Mean ± SE) of pulse beetle in stored chickpeas treated with different concentrations of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae.
Figure 11
Modeling trend of days to 100% mortality of F1 adults (Mean ± SE) of pulse beetle in stored chickpeas treated with different concentrations of B. bassiana.
Figure 12
Modeling trend of days to 100% mortality of F1 adults (Mean ± SE) of pulse beetle in stored chickpeas treated with different concentrations of M. anisopliae.
Figure 13
Percent weight loss (Mean ± SE) caused by pulse beetle in stored chickpeas treated with different concentrations of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae.
Figure 14
Modeling trend of percent weight loss (Mean ± SE) caused by pulse beetle in stored chickpeas treated with different concentrations of B. bassiana.
Figure 15
Modeling trend of percent weight loss (Mean ± SE) caused by pulse beetle in stored chickpeas treated with different concentrations of M. anisopliae.
Figure 16
Percent damage (Mean ± SE) caused by pulse beetle in stored chickpeas treated with different concentrations of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae.
Figure 17
Modeling trend of percent damage (Mean ± SE) caused by pulse beetle in stored chickpeas treated with different concentrations of B. bassiana.
Figure 18
Modeling trend of percent damage (Mean ± SE) caused by pulse beetle in stored chickpeas treated with different concentrations of M. anisopliae.