Research Article

HIV-2 Incidence Decline in West Africa - A Perspective on the Need for Vigilance

Lipigwe Lauya1*, Peace Nkiruka Okeke2, Nanma Tongnan Cosmas1 and Chukwudi Chizorom Ibeh1

1Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Nigeria; 2Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, United States.

Received | March 23, 2024; Accepted | April 29, 2024; Published | May 23, 2024

*Correspondence | Lipigwe Lauya, Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Nigeria; Email: lauyalipigwe@gmail.com

Citation | Lauya, L., P.N. Okeke, N.T. Cosmas and C.C. Ibeh. 2024. HIV-2 incidence decline in West Africa- A perspective on the need for vigilance. Hosts and Viruses, 11: 20-26.

DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.hv/2024/11.20.26

Keywords: HIV-2, Incidence, Decline, West Africa, Epidemiology, Public health

Copyright: 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Introduction

There are two different trends of HIV epidemiology in West Africa: The decline in the incidence of HIV-2 and the persistence of HIV-1. The former appears to offer a sense of victory in the broader campaign against HIV/AIDS but also raises doubts about the true nature of the situation, given the factors protesting the incidence of the disease and the lack of congregated epidemiologic data (Lauya et al., 2023; UNAIDS, 2023). We suspect that the viral strain may be undergoing deceptive reinforcement and could bounce back, especially that there are reported subtypes (Chen et al., 1997; Damond et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2008), and changes in natural phenomena that would make the virus unlikely to be eradicated (Woolhouse et al., 2012; Diamandis, 2022). Previously, we raised further concerns about the decline in HIV-2 cases, questioning “whether the factors responsible are sufficient to keep the virus in its nature and maintain the current pattern of the disease in West Africa” (Lauya et al., 2023). Regardless of the case, there is a need for careful thought to interpret the status and implications of HIV-2 not only for immediate necessity but also for preparedness against impending viral resurgence. This is a strong possibility because of the ever-adapting nature of HIV, which is characterized by a high rate of genetic mutation, suggesting that we cannot afford to uphold complacency. Besides, there are cautious suggestions as that from Diamandis who re-emphasized the importance of implementing lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic to prevent unintended microbial threats. He considered the human-virus relationship “The mother of all battles” (Diamandis, 2022).

If we put the HIV strains side by side, there is a clear indication that HIV-2 has been under the umbrella of HIV-1 both in terms of research and resource allocation. The perceived low pathogenicity of HIV-2 (Gottlieb et al., 2018) and supposedly, health system adaptation hastened this triviality. However, in the new world, plagued with unpredictable microbial evolution and changes in natural phenomena, there should be no justification valid enough to rule out the possibility of potential dangers associated with HIV-2. Misunderstanding the epidemiological status of the disease holds the risk of spreading the virus beyond regional borders, weakening our collective efforts against HIV/AIDS and hindering equitable access to health and well-being.

The declining incidence of HIV-2 seems to create an illusory sense of security, tempting us to overlook latent vulnerabilities, especially for economically broke populations, where the spotlight on HIV-1 might unintentionally ignore HIV-2. Thus, we proclaim a hidden threat and advocate for skepticism toward the declining statistics. We must continue to be vigilant, understanding the complex nature of the virus and acting with far sightedness and resilience before the door to address this embryonic challenge closes.

Challenges and implications of the decline in HIV-2 incidence in West Africa

HIV diagnostic algorithm: The accurate diagnosis of HIV-2 infection is the backbone for achieving broader epidemiological and patient management goals (Berry, 2013). However, there is a large gap between these needs and access to suitable diagnostic systems in West Africa, especially due to deficient diagnostic algorithms, inefficient RDTs, and gaps in resistance testing.

The current diagnostic algorithm designed for HIV-1 falls short in classifying HIV-2 due to inherent genetic and antigenic differences (Shah et al., 2022). Likewise, the ability of the serologic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to accurately classify HIV types is suboptimal (Yuksel et al., 2018). Moreover, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for HIV diagnosis have serious limitations; RDTs exhibit inaccuracies, low sensitivity and specificity, high rates of false HIV diagnoses, and cross-reactivity issues (Ceccarelli et al., 2021). The management of HIV-2 in West Africa is further limited by the difficulty of quantifying the HIV-2 RNA load in the laboratory, as well as scarcity of commercial laboratories equipped for this task (Berry, 2013; Shah et al., 2022; Damond et al., 2008; Vallefuoco et al., 2016). Consequently, our ability to monitor HIV-2 at the species level is lacking. Additionally, the unavailability of HIV-2 phenotypic and genotypic resistance testing, along with a lack of clear guidance in interpreting mutations, complicates diagnostic insufficiencies (Shah et al., 2022). Meanwhile, it is possible to use the Cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative assay to discriminate between HIV types (Duncan et al., 2021), but the method is rarely available.

This multifaceted situation has contributed to the decline in the incidence of HIV-2 in West Africa. This means that most patients go unnoticed, leading to increased morbidity and mortality and underestimation of cases. The absence of a clear HIV-2 testing algorithm allows the virus to not only remain undiagnosed and undetected within marginalized populations but also opens the door for the resurgence of super-pathogenic and treatment-resistant strains. These gaps in diagnostics challenge our ability to obtain trustworthy data, and will delay our efforts to quickly identify and control potentially dangerous HIV-2 evolution. See the HIV testing algorithm here (Shah et al., 2022).

Chance of genetic mutation and recombination

The dynamic genetic recombination and rapid mutation rates of retroviruses are fertile ground for the evolution of novel HIV strains, which are ever-present and evolving threats (Vignuzzi et al., 2006; Pond et al., 2012; Pérez-Losada et al., 2015). Nearly every known genome of HIV viruses globally has developed mechanisms that outrun our defences, and various variants have become resistant to all available antiviral drugs (WHO, 2021). The diversity and re-emergence of HIV genes suggest that it is reasonable to expect the classification of potential variants of HIV-2 (Woolhouse et al., 2012). Furthermore, consistent with the typical characteristics of RNA viruses, HIV-2 has higher mutation rates than its host cells, sometimes reaching a million times greater (Duffy, 2018). Generally, viral mutations are catastrophic and fuel the virus’s adaptation and resistance. However, as Duffy noted, such mutations can also rarely backfire, during which the virus mutants generate self-damaging errors (Duffy, 2018). Moreover, the current state of fragile health infrastructure in West African settings introduces the possibility of delays in identifying a more pathogenic form of the HIV-2 strain (Azevedo, 2017; Adebisi et al., 2021). If more dangerous subtypes of HIV-2 emerge, there is a risk that significant harm may occur before identifying and controlling them. Woolhouse and colleagues strongly advised adopting an effective global surveillance system for novel viruses (Woolhouse et al., 2012).

HIV cross-reactivity

Patients infected with HIV-1 often generate an immune response that similarly cross-reacts to HIV-2 during coinfection due to antigenic similarities (Karlsson et al., 2019). This phenomenon is not limited to natural immune responses but extends to diagnostic testing procedures. The commonly used diagnostic methods available in West Africa, such as enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), are limited by these concepts, thus impacting diagnostic accuracy and patient management (Gottlieb et al., 2018; Hønge et al., 2018). Cross-reactivity between HIV strains poses a risk of diagnostic confusion, hindering the accurate determination of the true incidence of each strain in the population. Consequently, the reported decrease in HIV-2 incidence may not reflect the actual situation, potentially masking the ongoing presence and spread of HIV-2. This raises concerns about the effectiveness of current diagnostic algorithms in accurately monitoring the decline of the disease in the region. Undetected, misclassified, or overlooked HIV-2 cases present a latent threat to public health.

Although advanced polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, such as the Cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative assay are available for differentiating between HIV and other pathogens (Vallefuoco et al., 2016; Duncan et al., 2021; Tchounga et al., 2023), these tools face the reality of limited accessibility and affordability in West Africa. As a result, the use of serologic tests such as RDTs persists. This reliance on serologic tests with potential cross-reactivity offers the disadvantage of misdiagnosis and false classification of HIV, consequentially leading to poor patient management and lack of accurate data.

Suboptimal/neglected treatment and care (S/NTC)

Despite the challenges and ambiguity surrounding HIV-2 statistics, 1.2 million people in West Africa are estimated to be infected with the virus, the highest not observed anywhere (Lauya et al., 2023; Gottlieb et al., 2018; Mendoza et al., 2020). Regardless of the lower global profile of HIV-2 patients than HIV-1 patients, these individuals do not deserve reluctance in treatment and care. Unfortunately, the reality in West Africa is no other than this.

Suboptimal/neglected treatment and care (S/NTC) for HIV-2 patients increases the chance of morbidity, which can lead to slower but progressive transmission dynamics within the population. Similarly, S/NTC encourages disease progression, leading to increased mortality rates due to AIDS (Lauya et al., 2023; Ceccarelli et al., 2021). Furthermore, when treatments are suboptimal or neglected, the viability of the virus is enhanced, leading to treatment failure and drug resistance. This is the case because the current treatment for HIV-2 follows the treatment algorithms for HIV-1, which are associated with massive drug resistance problems (Shah et al., 2022; Ceccarelli et al., 2021). Accordingly, the true impact of S/NTC is two edged: Firstly, it is suggestive of a cause of declining incidence of HIV-2 as we previously reported (Lauya et al., 2023). Secondly, it is a key determinant of the progressive and prolonged burden of the disease in West Africa.

Surveillance challenges

The health surveillance systems in West Africa do not match the disease burden in the region. Most revealing is that no West African country surpasses the minimal cut-off of 15% for achieving universal health coverage (Adebisi et al., 2021). The top three are Ghana (8.43%), Cape Verde (8.29%), and Burkina Faso (7.60%) (Adebisi et al., 2021). There are various limitations, including insufficient laboratories and infrastructure, supposed lack of skilled human resources, ethical issues, and potentially overwhelming growth in human population size (Adebisi et al., 2021; Aborode et al., 2021; Bassey and Miteu, 2023). However, unique surveillance challenges exist for HIV-2 patients due to its lower global profile compared to that of HIV-1 patients.

In many countries in West Africa, there is a concerning lack of data on the incidence of HIV-1/HIV-2 (Lauya et al., 2023; Joshi et al., 2021). The limited availability and accessibility of diagnostic tests specifically designed to detect and differentiate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 can be attributed to this lack of data (Damond et al., 2008). These deficiencies increase the possibility of misdiagnosing and underreporting HIV-2 infections. Consequently, our understanding of the true extent of the virus has been limited. Another challenge is the limited awareness and knowledge about HIV among health workers (Umeh et al., 2008), as well as the asymptomatic nature of HIV-2 infection and its slower pathogenic processes. This situation creates the risk of missed opportunities for proper testing and treatment for individuals infected with HIV-2.

Surveillance and testing programs for HIV-2 is deprived. This is justified by the obvious continued focus on HIV-1. Without effective surveillance, it is difficult to gather useful data for implementing effective public health policies. Prioritizing HIV-1 without considering HIV-2 is akin to fighting HIV with only half the information, because the rapid molecular and genetic evolutions of the virus could create unique differences between the two strains. This preference may lead to uninformed policies and strategies that would undermine the overall HIV response. It increases the risk of underestimating the number of HIV-2 cases, ultimately resulting in new cases in other parts of the world, as already observed in Europe, India, and the United States (Campbell-Yesufu and Gandhi, 2011; Saraiya et al., 2018).

Global health inequalities

According to the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), inequalities, including gender-based issues, stigmatization, discrimination, discrepancies in resource allocation, and neglected children’s access to healthcare, are key indicators of progressive HIV/AIDS cases (UNAIDS, 2022). To mitigate these international and local issues, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Health Inequality Data Repository in April 2023. This repository prioritized current health and development issues, including HIV (Kirkby et al., 2023; Hosseinpoor et al., 2023). While this is good news, it is important to consider inequalities in terms of specific viral strains of morbidities. For example, let us recognize the ingenuity of HIV data in West Africa, given that two different strains of the virus (HIV-1 and HIV-2) are implicated in the disease. Preference for one strain over the other not only nurtures potential disasters but also sets aside vulnerable populations, such as sex workers and homosexuals (Djomand et al., 2014; Stannah et al., 2023). This inequality further hinders their access to healthcare services, including HIV testing and treatment. Consequently, neglecting HIV-2 in West Africa will contribute to global health inequalities. Considering the interconnectedness of our world, HIV-2 will continue to spread sporadically until it reaches an alarming threshold, undermining the United Nations (UN) efforts toward global health equity. If we fail to address the partiality of classifying HIV burden based on specific viral strains, the HIV/AIDS we are up against may only be partially threatened.

Conclusions and Recommendations

The following limits HIV-2 management in West Africa: inadequate diagnostic systems, including ineffective testing algorithms, unreliable rapid diagnostic tests, unavailable resistance tests, and the issue of cross-reactivity between HIV-1 and HIV-2 during testing. There is also inequality in classifying HIV burdens based on HIV type and designing specific policies. Furthermore, healthcare providers often overlook HIV-2 patients, resulting in suboptimal treatment and care. All of these factors raise doubts about the reliability of the reported decline in HIV-2 incidence in the region. We caution that the supposedly declining statistics on HIV-2 could be premature victory against HIV/AIDS. We emphasize the need for improved diagnostic systems and processes, strengthened surveillance systems, optimized treatment and care, and addressed inequality in HIV-2 management. By strengthening these areas, we can ensure more equitable patient management and obtain reliable HIV-2 data, which will in turn sustain progress in the ongoing battle against HIV/AIDS in West Africa. Where the HIV-2 incidence is declining as the case may be, the virus is not disappearing. We suggest that there should be no place for health system adaptation where either strain of HIV is marginalized or prioritized; the fight against HIV/AIDS should remain robust and all inclusive.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Nanma Tongnan Cosmas for her invaluable support and contributions during the writing process. The peer reviewers for this article are also acknowledged for their expert contributions.

Novelty Statement

This article provides novel perspective on the declining incidence of HIV-2 in West Africa. While this trend is celebrated, the authors argue that this perception overlook critical issues. Our opinion can lead to more nuanced understanding of the HIV-2 situation in West Africa and direct better strategies for managing the virus.

Author’s Contribution

LL conceptualized and wrote the manuscript.

PNO, NTC and ICC contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Aborode, A.T., Hasan, M.M., Jain, S., Okereke, M., Adedeji, O. J., Karra-Aly, A., and Fasawe, A. S. 2021. Impact of poor disease surveillance system on COVID-19 response in Africa: Time to rethink and rebuilt. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health, 12: 100841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100841

Adebisi, Y.A., Alaran, A., Badmos, A., Bamisaiye, A. O., Emmanuella, N., Etukakpan, A. U., Oladunjoye, I. O., Oluwaseyifunmi, O., Musa, S. K., Akinmuleya, T., Olaoye, O. C., Olarewaju, O. A., and Lucero-Prisno, D. E.2021. How West African countries prioritize health. Trop Med. Health, 49(1): 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-021-00380-6

Adebisi, Y.A., Rabe, A. and Lucero-Prisno, D.E., 2021. COVID-19 surveillance systems in African countries. Health Promot. Perspect.,11(4): 382-392. https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2021.49

Azevedo, M.J., 2017. The state of health systems in Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Hist.Persp. State Health Health Syst. Afr., 2: 1-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32564-4_1

Bassey, A.E. and Miteu, G.D., 2023. A review of current trends in HIV epidemiology, surveillance, and control in Nigeria. Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond). 85(5): 1790-1795. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000604

Berry, N.J., 2013. HIV-2 diagnosis and viral load measurements. In: Hope, T., Stevenson, M., Richman, D., editors. Encyclopedia of AIDS. New York (NY): Springer; 2013. Chapter 53-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9610-6_53-1

Campbell-Yesufu, O.T. and Gandhi, R.T., 2011. Update on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-2 infection. Clin. Infect. Dis., 52(6): 780-787. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq248

Ceccarelli, A., d’Ettorre, G., Angeletti, S., Borsetti, A., and Ciccozzi, M. 2021. Human immunodeficiency virus type 2: The neglected threat. Pathogens, 10(11): 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111377

Chen, Z., Luckay, A., Sodora, D.L., Telfer, P., Reed, P., Gettie, A., Kanu, J.M., Sadek, R.F., Yee, J., Ho, D.D., Zhang, L., and Marx, P.A., 1997. Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) seroprevalence and characterization of a distinct HIV-2 genetic subtype from the natural range of simian immunodeficiency virus-infected sooty mangabeys. J. Virol., 71(5): 3953–3960. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.71.5.3953-3960.1997

Damond, F., Benard, A., Ruelle, J., Alabi, A., Kupfer, B., Gomes, P., Rodes, B., Albert, J., Böni, J., Garson, J., Ferns, B., Matheron, S., Chene, G., Brun-Vezinet, F., and ACHIE. 2008. Quality control assessment of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) viral load quantification assays: Results from an international collaboration on HIV-2 infection in 2006. J. Clin. Microbiol., 46(6): 2088-2091. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00126-08

Damond, F., Worobey, M., Campa, P., Farfara, I., Colin, G., Matheron, S., Brun-Vézinet, F., Robertson, D.L., and Simon, F., 2004. Identification of a highly divergent HIV type 2 and proposal for a change in HIV type 2 classification. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses, 20(6): 666–672. https://doi.org/10.1089/0889222041217392

Diamandis, E.P., 2022. The mother of all battles: Viruses vs humans. Can humans avoid extinction in 50-100 years? Open Life Sci., 17(1): 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0005

Djomand, G., Quaye, S. and Sullivan, P.S., 2014. HIV epidemic among key populations in West Africa. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS, 9(5): 506-513. https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0000000000000090

Duffy, S., 2018. Why are RNA virus mutation rates so damn high? PLoS Biol., 16(8): e3000003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000003

Duncan, D., Duncan, J., Kramer, B., Nilsson, A. Y., Haile, B., Butcher, A., Chugh, S., Baum, P., Aldrovandi, G. M., Young, S., Avery, A. K., Tashima, K., Valsamakis, A., Yao, J. D., Chang, M., and Coombs, R. W. 2021. An HIV diagnostic testing algorithm using the Cobas HIV-1/HIV-2 qualitative assay for HIV type differentiation and confirmation. J. Clin. Microbiol., 59(7): e0303020. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03030-20

Gottlieb, G.S., Raugi, D.N. and Smith, R.A., 2018. 90-90-90 for HIV-2? Ending the HIV-2 epidemic by enhancing care and clinical management of patients infected with HIV-2. Lancet HIV, 5(7): e390-e399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30094-8

Hønge, B.L., Jespersen, S., Medina, C., Té, D. S., da Silva, Z. J., Christiansen, M., Kjerulff, B., Laursen, A. L., Wejse, C., Krarup, H., Erikstrup, C., and Bissau. 2018. The challenge of discriminating between HIV-1, HIV-2, and HIV-1/2 dual infections. HIV Med., 19(6): 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12606

Hosseinpoor, A.R., Bergen, N., Kirkby, K., Schlotheuber, A., Antiporta, D.A. and Mac Feely, S., 2023. WHO’s health inequality data repository. Bull World Health Organ., 101(5): 298-298A. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.290004

Joshi, K., Lessler, J. and Olawore, O., Loevinsohn, G., Bushey, S., Tobian, A. A. R., and Grabowski, M. K. 2021. Declining HIV incidence in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of empiric data. J. Int. AIDS Soc., 24(10): e25818. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25818

Karlsson, I., Tingstedt, J.L. and Şahin, G.O., Hansen, M., Szojka, Z., Buggert, M., Biague, A., Da Silva, Z., Månsson, F., Esbjörnsson, J., Norrgren, H., Medstrand, P., Fomsgaard, A., Jansson, M., and Sweden-Guinea-Bissau Cohort Research Group. 2019. Cross-reactive antibodies with the capacity to mediate HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein-targeted antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity identified in HIV-2-infected individuals. J. Infect. Dis., 219(11): 1749-1754. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz001

Kirkby, K., Bergen, N., Baptista, A., Schlotheuber, A. and Hosseinpoor, A.R., 2023. Data resource profile: World health organization health inequality data repository. Int. J. Epidemiol., 52(5): e253-e262. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyad078

Lauya, L., Okeke, P.N., Ibeh, C.C., Banimoh, B.O. and Cosmas, N.T., 2023. Factors associated with declining incidence of HIV-2 in West Africa: A systematic literature review. Hosts Viruses, 10: 24-35. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.hv/2023/10.24.35

Mendoza, C., Lozano, A.B., Caballero, E., Cabezas, T., Ramos, J.M. and Soriano, V., 2020. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV-2 infection in non-endemic regions. AIDS Rev., 22(1): 44-56. https://doi.org/10.24875/AIDSRev.M20000029

Pérez-Losada, M., Arenas, M., Galán, J.C., Palero, F. and González-Candelas, F., 2015. Recombination in viruses: Mechanisms, methods of study, and evolutionary consequences. Infect. Genet. Evol., 30: 296-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2014.12.022

Pond, S.L., Murrell, B. and Poon, A.F., 2012. Evolution of viral genomes: Interplay between selection, recombination, and other forces. Methods Mol. Biol., 856: 239-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-585-5_10

Saraiya, N., Kanagala, V. and Corpuz, M., 2018. HIV-2 in the United States: Rare but not forgotten. AIDS. 32(11): 1547-1549. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001856

Shah, S.S, Fine, S.M., Vail, R.M., McGowan, J. P., Merrick, S. T., Radix, A. E., Hoffmann, C. J., and Gonzalez, C. J. 2022. Diagnosis and management of HIV-2 in adults. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University; August 2022.

Smith, S.M., Christian, D., de Lame, V., Shah, U., Austin, L., Gautam, R., Gautam, A., Apetrei, C. and Marx, P.A., 2008. Isolation of a new HIV-2 group in the US. Retrovirology, 5: 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-5-103

Stannah, J., Soni, N., Lam, J.K.S., Giguère, K., Mitchell, K. M., Kronfli, N., Larmarange, J., Moh, R., Nouaman, M., Kouamé, G. M., Boily, M. C., and Maheu-Giroux, M. 2023. Trends in HIV testing, the treatment cascade, and HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV, 10(8): e528-e542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00111-X

Tchounga, B.K., Bertine, M., Damond, F., Ferré, V. M., Inwoley, A., Boni, S. P., Moisan, A., Plantier, J. C., Descamps, D., Ekouevi, D. K., and Charpentier, C. 2023. Molecular confirmation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 coinfections among initially serologically dually reactive samples from patients living in West Africa. PLoS One, 18(3): e0283602. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283602

Umeh, C.N., Essien, E.J., Ezedinachi, E.N. and Ross, M.W., 2008. Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes about HIV/AIDS-related issues, and the sources of knowledge among health care professionals in southern Nigeria. J. R. Soc. Promot. Health, 128(5): 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424008092793

UNAIDS, 2022. Dangerous inequalities: World AIDS Day report 2022. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

UNAIDS, 2023. Fact sheets, 2023. Available at: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf. (accessed 2 Feb 2024).

Vallefuoco, L., Mazzarella, C. and Portella, G., 2016. Fourth generation assays for HIV testing. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn., 16(7): 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2016.1179115

Vignuzzi, M., Stone, J.K., Arnold, J.J., Cameron, C.E. and Andino, R., 2006. Quasis pecies diversity determines pathogenesis through cooperative interactions in a viral population. Nature, 439(7074): 344-348. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04388

WHO, 2021. HIV drug resistance report, 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240038608. (accessed 2 Feb 2024).

Woolhouse, M., Scott, F., Hudson, Z., Howey, R. and Chase-Topping, M., 2012. Human viruses: Discovery and emergence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 367(1604): 2864–2871. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0354

Yuksel, P., Saribas, S., Kuskucu, M., Mutcali, S. I., Kosan, E., Habip, Z., Demirci, M., Kara, E. S., Birinci, I., Caliskan, R., Dinc, H. O., Midilli, K., Ziver, T., and Kocazeybek, B. 2018. Problems encountered in conventional HIV 1/2 Algorithms: lack of necessity for immunoblot assays to confirm repeated ELISA reactive results. Afr. Health Sci., 18(2): 407-416. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i2.26