Evaluation of Conservation Tillage System Performance for Rainfed Wheat Production in upland of Pakistan
Muhammad Sharif1*, Shahzada Sohail Ijaz2, Muhammad Ansar3, Ijaz Ahmad4 and Syed Abdul Sadiq5
1Department of Soil Science,Balochistan Agriculture College, Quetta, Pakistan; 2Institute of Soil Science, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan; 3Department of Agronomy, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan; 4Ecotoxicology Research Institute, National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan; 5Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Balochistan Agriculture College, Quetta, Pakistan.
Figure 1:
Monthly rainfall and mean maximum and minimum temperature during experimental period.
Figure 2:
Seedling emergence under the tillage treatements with and without crop residue for the two years: (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 was low under zero tillage without retention of crop residues.
Figure 3:
Wheat biomass under the tillage treatements with and without crop residue for the two years: (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 was low under zero tillage without retention of cropresidues.
Figure 4:
Wheat grain yield under the tillage treatements with and without crop residue for the two years: (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 was low under zero tillage without retention of crop residues.
Figure 5:
Wheat crop harvest index under the tillage treatements with and without crop residue for the two years: (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 was not effected by different tillage systems and residues management.
Figure 6:
Gross marginal return under the tillage treatements with and without crop residue for the two years: (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 was low under zero tillage with and without crop residues.
Figure 7:
Efficiency coefficient under the tillage treatements with and without crop residue for the two years: (a) 2012-13, (b) 2013-14 was higher under reduced tillage and zero tillage withand without crop residues.