Effects of Pinus koraiensis Bark Substrate on the Behavioural Responses of Captive Giant Pandas
Ming-Yue Zhang*, Bo Yuan, Xiao-Hui Zhang, James Ayalaand Rong Hou*
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology for Endangered Wildlife, Chengdu, 610081, China
Fig. 1.
Feeding time distribution of adult and juvenile captive giant pandas in different locations. a, b, c, d: Different superscripts indicate significant differences in the feeding times of adult giant pandas between different locations (p<0.01). X, Y, Z, K: Different superscripts indicate significant differences in the feeding times of juvenile giant pandas between different locations (p<0.01). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Fig. 2.
Effects of laying substrate on the state behaviors of adult and juvenile captive giant pandas. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM; * p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
Fig. 3.
Event behavioral performance distribution of adult and juvenile captive giant pandas in different locations. a, b, c, d: Different superscripts indicate significant differences in expressing event behaviors of adult giant pandas between different locations (p<0.01). X, Y, Z: Different superscripts indicate significant differences in expressing event behaviours of juvenile giant pandas between different locations (p<0.01). α, β, γ, δ, ε: Different superscripts indicate significant differences in expressing event behaviors of juvenile giant pandas between different locations (p<0.01). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM; * p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
Fig. 4.
Effects of laying substrate on the playing behavior of juvenile giant pandas. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM; * p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
Fig. 5.
Effects of laying substrate on the stereotypic behavior of adult and juvenile giant pandas. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM; * p<0.05; ** p<0.01.