Effects of Aphid Infestation on Yield and Yield Parameters of Brassica juncea Crop
Research Article
Effects of Aphid Infestation on Yield and Yield Parameters of Brassica juncea Crop
Umair Faheem1*, Madiha Mobeen Khan2, Qurban Ali3, Muhammad Jamil4, Wajiha Anum2, Mashal Rehman2, Imran Akhtar2, Mussurrat Hussain1, Qaisar Abbas1, Ghayour Ahmad5 and Abrar Ahmad6
1Entomological Research Sub Station, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan; 2Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan; 3Entomological Research Institute, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan; 4Cotton Research Station, Vehari, Punjab, Pakistan; 5Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan; 6Vegetable Research Sub Station, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
Abstract | Pakistan had to devour huge money on the import of edible oil. Aphids are the most notorious insect pests of Brassica crops in Pakistan and throughout the world as well. Host plant resistance is one of the most useful tools for the management of aphids in Brassica crop. This trial was executed at the farm of Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Bahawalpur to report the impact of aphid damage on yield and yield parameters on Brassica juncea. Five varieties/strains i.e. BRJ-9070, BRJ-9072, BRJ-1004, BRJ-1104 and KP Raya were grown in two sets with Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and there were three replications. No pesticides used on untreated block and natural populations of aphids were allowed to develop to estimate losses while and aphid population was recorded every 10 days intervals, while the treated blocks were kept free from aphids by the use of carbosulfan @ 400 ml/acre. At crop maturity, crop parameters like plant height (cm), number of silique per plant, yield loss in unsprayed blocks was compared to the yield of pesticide sprayed blocks. The yield components and yield in the insecticide free plots were much lower than that of insecticide sprayed plots which were kept aphid free. Maximum percentage reduction (14%) in plant height was observed on BRJ-9072, the silique per plant loss percentage was maximum on KP-raya (36.97%), whereas maximum percentage loss of yield per hectare (70.77%) was observed on BRJ-1104. Application of insecticide would still be required for the control of aphids as the current varieties lack complete or sufficient resistance against them.
Received | January 17, 2022; Accepted | August 29, 2022; Published | September 08, 2022
*Correspondence | Umair Faheem, Entomological Research Sub Station, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan; Email: [email protected]
Citation |Faheem, U., M.M. Khan, Q. Ali, M. Jamil, W. Anum, M. Rehman, I. Akhtar, M. Hussain, Q. Abbas, G. Ahmad and A. Ahmad. 2022. Effects of aphid infestation on yield and yield parameters of Brassica juncea crop. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 35(3): 547-552.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2022/35.3.547.552
Keywords | Brassica, Aphid, Yield, Yield parameters, Losses
Copyright: 2022 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Brassica spp. family Cruciferae has a prime position as a resource of edible oil for humans (Mandal et al., 2012). In Pakistan, the most abundant species of Brasicae comprise Brassica campestris L., B. juncea L. and B. napus L. (Khan and Begum, 2005). It occupies an area of 2,22,000 hectares with 4,88,000 tons of production (Anonymous, 2021).
The injury done by insect pests is a limiting factor for successful brassica cultivation (Rana, 2005). Aphid is a main insect pest of brassica crop (Razaq et al., 2011). Three species of aphids attack Brassica such as Lipaphiserysimi (Kalt.), Brevicoryne brassica (L.) and Myzus persicae (Sulz.) (Hamid and Ahmad, 1980; Rustamani et al., 1998). In Southern Punjab, Pakistan L.erysimi and B.brassicae are the most vicious insect pests of Brassica crop (Hussain et al., 2015). Both L. erysimi and B. brassicae L. can cause 70-80% damage in oilseed brassicas. In case of heavy damage and sporadic attack, there might be no grains in pod in the produce (Rustamani et al., 1988; Khattak et al., 2002). B. brassicae and L. erysimi are also reported to decrease photosynthetic factors and photosynthetic activity in brassica (Hussain et al., 2014; Razaq et al., 2014). They also affect the yield and yield parameters (Hussain et al., 2015).
Several control techniques are employed to control aphids. Although, biological control technique and host plant resistance is eco-friendly. The existing strains of B. campestris L., B. napus and B. juncea are deficient in plant resistance to withstand injury caused by aphids (Amer et al., 2009; Aslam et al., 2009). The biological control insects are inadequate to manage the population of aphids in Brassica. The growers have to rely on use of selective chemicals (Aslam and Razaq, 2007; Hainan et al., 2007). Insecticides are being used successfully for inhibiting the losses caused by aphids on Brassica (Brown et al., 1999).
Recently, Ahmed et al. (2013), and Razaq et al. (2011) compared the resistance of Brassica crop against aphids at different locations (Peshawar and Multan) of Pakistan. Aphid arrival, maximum and minimum population of aphid on Brassica crop on different strains were also studied (Ahmad et al., 2013; Ali et al., 2019; Razaq et al., 2014). Effect of aphid population on yield and yield components i.e. plant length, pods per plant, pod weight, grains per pod, thousand seed weight and yield per hectare and pod length on different strains were also studied (Ahmad et al., 2013; Razaq et al., 2011). Imidachloprid 20SL @ 80ml/acre also significantly reduce aphid population on Brassica (Hussain et al., 2015; Razaq et al., 2011, 2014).
So far no study is done on the evaluation of yield losses and its parameters due to attack of aphid and the impact of insecticide (carbosulfan) spray to late sown B. juncea at Bahawalpur, Punjab conditions. For late sowing the latest available strains of Brassica, were used. This experiment was performed to report the consequence of aphid infestation on yield and yield parameters on insecticides treated and untreated plots.
Materials and Methods
Location
The research experiment was performed during the cropping season, 2017-2018 at the research farms of Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Varieties/strains
Five varieties/strains namely BRJ-9070, BRJ-9072, BRJ-1004, BRJ-1104 and KP Raya were sown at late planting time of 15 November, 2019. This was done in order to maximize the aphid population build up.
Planting geometry
Randomized complete block design (RCBD) was used and there was three replications and plot size of 15×5 feet for each entry. 1.5 feet was row to row spacing. Two sets of five raya varieties/strains were sown.
Agronomic practices
At the time of sowing 75 kg of nitrogen per ha and 60 kg of phosphorous per ha were applied. After thirty days of emergence of crop thinning was carried out and harvesting was done at crop maturity.
Data collection of aphid population
Aphids were allowed to develop on untreated blocks and aphid population was observed from 10 randomly selected plants after 10 days of interval from the inflorescence of 10 cm length, while the treated blocks were kept free from aphids by using carbosulfan@400 ml/acre at the time of appearance of pest till the maturity of crop. A total of two sprays of carbosulfan@400 ml/acre were applied during the season.
Yield and other parameters
From each plot yield was measured by harvesting 1 meter square from a row of each plot and converted to kg/ha. Yields of unsprayed plots and sprayed plots were compared and percentage loss was evaluated for each variety using the following formulae:
Yield loss = yield in sprayed plots – yield in unsprayed plots … (1)
Loss in yield (%) =loss in yield/yield in sprayed plots ×100 … (2)
(Jarvie and Shanahan, 2009; Razaq et al., 2011).
Similar formula was applied to calculate loss in silique per plant and plant height.
Plant height (cm) and number of silique per plant were observed from 05 plants randomly selected from sprayed and unsprayed rows in each treatment at the end of the season.
Statistical analysis
Number of aphids and yield characteristics were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) through computer software Statistix 8.1. Differences among the treatments were determined by Least Significant Difference (LSD) test.
Results and Discussion
Effect of time on aphid population
The aphid population began to increase at the end of February with gradual increase till the 18th of March. After that a gradual decline in aphid population was observed (Table 1).
Ahmad et al. (2013) found that during 2006-2008 at Peshawar, Khayber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan aphids per plant on twelve brassica varieties/strains were highest during the mid-week of January. Meanwhile, Razaq et al. (2014) studied that maximum aphid infestation was on mid of February at Multan, Punjab, Pakistan on the strains Can Raya and Con-I, while the highest infestation on Con-II and Westar was observed on start of March.
The population of aphid was found started to build up in all strains of Brassica during mid of November, 2013. The maximum infestation of six aphids/ leaf was observed at first week of December and in contrast the lowest infestation of 1.1 aphids/ leaf was noted during 2nd week of November (Ali et al., 2019).
Effect of varieties/strains on aphid population
The population data of aphid showed significant differences on all the varieties/lines. Maximum population of aphid was observed on Khanpur-raya (33.55 aphids/10cm of inflorescence). Followed by BRJ-1104 (31.22 aphids/10cm of inflorescence) and BRJ-1004 (30.75 aphids/10cm of inflorescence). Minimum population was found in the end of February on BRJ-9072 and BRJ-9070 (14.76 and 15.54/10cm of inflorescence, respectively) (Table 1), this was in paralell with the conclusions of Mamun et al. (2010) and Ahmad et al. (2013) that aphid damage showed tendency from flowering, reached at its peak at pod formation, and then tended to decrease in all varieties.
Effect of insecticide application
The yield and yield parameters are found to be statistically non-significant with all the advanced lines/strains. However, the difference between yields attributes of sprayed and unsprayed plots were highly significant. On the insect free plots, Plant height as high as 170cm was obtained on the KP-raya and BRJ-1004, maximum number of silique per plants (348 cm) was obtained on KP-raya, maximum yield per hectare (1203 kg/ha) was also obtained on BRJ-1104 (Table 2). On the unsprayed plots, maximum plant height (150cm) was obtained on BRJ-1004, maximum silique per plant (222) on KP-Raya and maximum yield (360 kg/ha) was obtained on BRJ-1004 (Table 2). The results were in conformity with
Table 1: Mean population of aphid per top 10 cm inflorescence on different varieties of B. juncea at Bahawalpur during, 2018-19.
Var/Lines |
Sampling dates |
||||
28-Feb |
8-Mar |
18-Mar |
28-Mar |
Mean |
|
BRJ-9070 |
15.56+2.62 |
20.67+1.24 |
35.34+2.71 |
30.67+3.81 |
25.56 d |
BRJ-9072 |
14.76+ 2.65 |
23.98+ 1.75 |
38.67+2.14 |
34.34+2.34 |
27.94 c |
BRJ-1004 |
16.67+ 2.96 |
27.34+ 1.71 |
41.65+2.15 |
37.34+2.14 |
30.75 bc |
BRJ-1104 |
20.44+ 2.17 |
27. 34+1.68 |
41.24+2.37 |
35.86+2.73 |
31.22 b |
KP-RAYA |
20.67+1.92 |
28.34+ 2.36 |
44.83+3.13 |
40.34+2.17 |
33.55 a |
Mean |
17.62 d |
25.53 c |
40.35 a |
35.71 b |
|
LSD value |
5.32 |
2.13 |
Table 2: Plant height, Silique per plant and yield per ha. of B. juncea varieties in sprayed and unsprayed plots at Bahawalpur during 2018-19.
|
BRJ-9070 |
BRJ-9072 |
BRJ-1004 |
BRJ-1104 |
KP-RAYA |
LSD value |
|
Plant height (cm) |
Sprayed |
163±2.64 abc |
165±2.89 ab |
170±2.76 a |
170±2.83 a |
170±3.07 a |
4.87 |
Unsprayed |
147±2.86 d |
141±3.08 d |
150±2.32 bcd |
147±3.08 cd |
149±2.74 bcd |
||
Silique/ plant |
Sprayed |
269±8.07 b |
266±6.23 b |
264±7.67b |
330 ± 7.32a |
348±7.56 a |
17.19 |
Unsprayed |
169±8.35 d |
168±7.93 d |
168±7.84d |
208 ± 7.78cd |
222±7.95bc |
||
Yield (Kg/ha)
|
Sprayed |
1272±22.37a |
1190±21.49a |
1201±21.92a |
1203± 23.29a |
1155±22.19a |
47.89 |
Unsprayed |
351±21.74 b |
357±21.92 b |
360±22.19 b |
351±21.49 b |
346±21.49 b |
(Malik and Deen, 1998; Brown et al., 1999; Ali et al., 2003; Tunçtürk and Iftçi, 2007; Shah et al., 2008; Razaq et al., 2011, 2014; Ahmad et al., 2013; Hussain et al., 2015). The yield and yield parameters are found to be statistically non-significant with all the advanced lines/strains. However, the difference between yields attributes of sprayed and unsprayed plots were highly significant.
Percentage reduction in yield and yield parameters
On the insecticide free plots the yield components and yield were much lower than that of insecticide sprayed plots which were kept aphid free. Maximum percentage reduction (14%) in plant height was observed on BRJ-9072, the silique per plant loss percentage was maximum on BRJ-9072 (37.10%), whereas maximum percentage loss of yield per hectare (70.77%) was observed on BRJ-1104 (Table 3). Results are in conformity with (Aslam and Razaq, 2007; Amer et al., 2009; Aslam et al., 2009; Razaq et al., 2011; Hussain et al., 2015). However, findings were different from that of Hussain et al. (2015) in terms of yield loss percentage as he reports 40-50% losses in the yield. The results were also different from Patel et al. (2004) as he reports 80.0 to 97.6% yield loss in B. juncea without insect pest management. This may be due to difference in materials and methods.
Table 3: Percent loss in yield and yield components of B. juncea lines/varieties at Bahawalpur during 2018-19.
S. No. |
Line/variety |
Plant height |
silique per plant |
Yield |
1 |
BRJ-9070 |
10.19 |
37.05 |
69.99 |
2 |
BRJ-9072 |
14.9 |
37.10 |
69.99 |
3 |
BRJ-1004 |
11.92 |
36.37 |
70.00 |
4 |
BRJ-1104 |
12.70 |
36.97 |
70.77 |
5 |
KP-RAYA |
12.70 |
36.21 |
70.00 |
Conclusions and Recommendations
It can be concluded that the application of insecticide is only feasible selection so far to minimize losses caused by aphid on Brassica crop. As the available cultivars lack plant resistance and biocontrol agents appear too late in the season to reduce aphid damage effectively. The lower aphid population caused increase plant height, silique per plants and yield per hectare and vice versa.
Acknowledgments
The first Author is highly thankful to Mr. Zamir Hussain and Mr. Zamir Ahmad, Entomological Research Sub Station, Multan for their kind support during the work.
Novelty Statement
Research work focused on how populations of aphids affect the Brassica crop.
Author’s Contribution
UF: Manuscript writing, data analysis and conducted experiment.
MMK: Written part of manuscript, data analysis and conducted experiment.
QA and MJ: Proof reading and conducted experiment.
WA MR, IA, MH, QA, GA and AA: Conducted experiment.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
References
Ahmad, M., M. Naeem and I.A. Khan. 2013. Relative abundance of aphid population on different brassica genotypes. Sarhad J. Agric., 29(1): 133-138.
Ali, N., F. Javidfar, J.Y. Elmira and M.Y. Mirza, 2003. Relationship among yield components and selection criteria for yield improvement in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Pak. J. Bot., 35: 167-174.
Ali, A., A. Hussain and A.Z. Shah. 2019. Population trend of canola aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on different brassica lines. Balochistan Rev., 10(2): 380-390.
Amer, M., M. Aslam, M. Razaq and M. Afzal. 2009. Lack of plant resistance against aphids, as indicated by their seasonal abundance in canola, Brassica napus (L.) in Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 41: 1043-1051.
Anonymous, 2021. Pakistan statistics year book 2021 Federal Bureau of Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Aslam, M. and M. Razaq. 2007. Arthropod fauna of Brassica napus and Brassica juncea from Southern Punjab (Pakistan). J. Agric. Urban Ent., 24: 49-50. https://doi.org/10.3954/1523-5475-24.2.49
Aslam, M., M. Razaq, M. Amer, F. Ahmad and Y.H. Mirza. 2009. Lack of plant resistance in Raya, Brassica juncea (L.) varieties against two aphid species in Southern Punjab. Pak. J. Zool., 41: 463-468.
Brown, J., J.P. McCaffrey, B.L. Harmon, J.B. Davis, A.P. Brown and D.A. Erickson. 1999. Effect of late season insect infestation on yield, yield components and oil quality of Brassica napus, B. rapa, B. juncea and Sinapis alba in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. J. Agric. Sci., 132: 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859699006413
Hainan, G., G.P. Fitt and G.H. Baker. 2007. Invertebrate pests of canola and their management in Australia: A review. Aust. J. Ent., 46: 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.2007.00594.x
Hamid, S., and S. Ahmad. 1980. Biological assessment of three different insecticides sprayed against Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) on winter oil-seed crops. Pro. Pak. Cong. Zool., pp. 293-290.
Hussain, A., M. Razaq, S.M. Zaka, W. Shahzad and K. Mahmood. 2015. Effect of aphid infestation on photosynthesis, growth and yield of Brassica carinataA. Braun. Pak. J. Zool., 47(5): 1335-1340.
Hussain, A., M. Razaq, W. Shahzad, K. Mahmood and F.Z.A. Khan. 2014. Influence of aphid herbivory on the photosynthetic parameters of Brassica campestris at Multan, Punjab, Pakistan. J. Biol. Environ. Sci., 5: 410-416.
Jarvie, J.A. and P.E. Shanahan. 2009. Assessing tolerance to soybean rust in selected genotypes. Field Crops Research, 114: 419-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.015
Khan, S.M. and H.A. Begum. 2005. Chemical control of canola aphid Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. (Aphididae; Homoptera). Pak. Entomol., 27(2): 29-35.
Khattak, S.U., M. Hameed, A.U. Khan, A. Zeb and A. Farid. 2002. Pesticidal control of rapeseed aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae L. Pak. J. Zool., 34: 222-228.
Malik, Y.P. and B. Deen. 1998. Impact of aphid (Lipahis eyrsimi) intensity on plant growth and seed characters of Indian mustard. Indian J. Ent., 24: 286-287.
Mamun, M.S.A., M.H. Ali, M.M. Ferdous, M.A. Rahman and M.A. Hossain. 2010. Assessment of several mustard varieties resistance to mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). J. Soil Nat., 4(1): 34-38.
Mandal, D., P. Bhowmik and M.L. Chatterjee. 2012. Evaluation of new and conventional insecticides for the management of mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. (Homoptera: Aphididae) on rapeseed (Brassica juncea L.). J. Plant Prot. Sci., 4(2): 37-42.
Nazeer, A., S. Ahmad, S. Ahmad, M. Junaid and N. Mehmood. 2013. Population trend of aphid (Lipaphis erysimi Kalt) on canola (Brassica spp.) cultivar in Peshawar. Pak. Entomol., 35(2): 135-138.
Patel, S.R., Awasthi, A.K., and R.K.S. Tomar. 2004. Assessment of yield losses in mustard due to mustard aphid. App. Ecol. Environ. Res., 2(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/02001015
Rana, J.S., 2005. Performance of Lipaphis erysimi (Homoptera: Aphididae) on different Brassica species in a tropical environment. J. Pest Sci., 78: 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-005-0088-3
Razaq, M., A. Mehmood, M. Aslam, M. Ismail, M. Afzal and S.A. Shad. 2011. Losses in yield and yield components caused by aphids to late sown Brassica napus L., Brassica Juncea L. and Brassica carrinata A. Braun at Multan, Punjab (Pakistan). Pak. J. Bot., 43(1): 319-324.
Razaq, M., G. Abbas, M. Farooq, M. Aslam and H.R. Athar. 2014. Effect of insecticidal application on aphid population, photosynthetic parameters and yield components of late sown varieties of canola, Brassica napus L. Pak. J. Zool., 46: 661-668.
Rustamani M.A., U.F. Qaimkahni, G.H. Munshi and A.B. Chutto. 1998. Efficacy of different insecticides against Mustard aphid. Sarhad J. Agric., 4: 659-664.
Rustamani, M.A., U.F. Qamikhani, G.H. Munshi and A.B. Chutto. 1988. Efficacy of different insecticides against mustard aphid, Brevicorynebrassicae L. Sarhad J. Agric., 4: 659-664.
Shah, M.M.R., A.K.M. Maula, M.N.A. Siddquie, M.A.A. Mamun and M.S. Islam. 2008. Effect of insecticides on the growth parameters, yield and oil content of mustard. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod., 3: 11-15.
Tunçtürk, M. and V. Çiftçi. 2007. Relationships between yield and some yield components in rapeseed (Brassica napusssp. oleifera L.) cultivars by using correlation and path analysis. Pak. J. Bot., 39: 81-84.
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?